Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
July,2046
Agrobacterium Co-cultivation and GUS Gene Expression in Transformed Tissue of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L')
M. A. Hossain, M. M. Shaikt, N. lslam, R. M. S. Shahnawazl' M. R.
infection times such as 60, 90 and 120 min. lt was found that transformed callus of variety lsd 31 have regenerato ability to produce shoots and roots. lnfection time has no effects n the regeneration reiponses. GUS assay was done among randomly selected calli from 120 min infection time, and showed the highest results and same per cent (100%) of calus was recorded GUS positive. Results indicate possibilities of genetic transformation of foregn genes in sugarcane variety lsd 31 of Bangladesh. Key words: Sugarcane, Agrobacterium, callus, GUS gene expression
INTRODUCTION Sugarcane is cultivated on large scale in tropical and subtropical regions as raw materials for sugar and industrial prducts, such as furfural, dextrans, and alcohol (Martin et al., 1982). Sugarcane represents 65% of the world sugar production (Anon, 1995). Traditional plant breeding techniques, together with chemical, biotechnological approaches, have been extensively used to increase crop yields by selecting improved varieties which are more productive and resistant to diseases and pathogens. Unfortunately some important traits such.as resistant to insect pest and to some herbicide appears to be absent from genetic pool of sugarcane cultlvars- (Arencibia ef al. 1997). Agrobacterium-mediaed genetic transformation may play important role in incorporaiion of foreign gene for the tlatsl The first efficient protcol for sugarcane transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefacens was reported by a team of scientists from the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Havana (Cuba) and th lnstitutl of Bio-Agriculture, Science Academia Sinica, Nan Kang, Taiwan. The new.method.increases possibilites for introducing ueful traits no many sugarcane cultivars of economic importance.(Arencibia ef a/. 1998). This report demonstratis transient gus gene expression n sugarcane tissue after co-cultivaton with A. fumefaciens. Agrobacterum-medated gene transfer is the riost widely used method to introduce foreign genes into plants (liorsch ef a/., 1995; Hooykaas and Schiperoort 1985; Hooykaas 1990), but in genera, monocotyledonous are iecalcifant to jnfecton by ihis bacterium (Hooykaas and Schlperoort, 1992). Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer has advantages over ther transformation methods, as it is simple, inexpensve and easy regeneration systems lntroduced gens are more likely to integrate into the host genome as single copy (thought to reduce co-suppression of gens), rather than multiple transgene integration other associated with direci DNA delvery (Register ef a/.
1994).
Bangladesh J. Sugarcane
July,2AA6
Agrobacterium strain AGLl containing bnary vector pTabT was used in this trial, The plasmid contains neomycin phosphotransferase (nptll) gene.and a l3-glucuronidase (GUS) gene in the T-DNA reglon, and canied rfampicin and tekacycline resistance gene outside T-DNA region. AGLl (pTab7) was grown at 2B0C for 4 d in liquid medium supplemented with rifampicin 20 mg l-t and tetracycline 5 mg l-1. lt was shaken at 150 rpm using a horzontal shaker. After 96 h, optical density (OD) of bacterial suspension culture at 600 nm was taken with the help of spectrophotometer, and when optical density (OD) reading was 1.0 then the culture was ready for infection.
Calli of the variety lsd 31 were infected wi1tj| Agrabacterium strain AGLl (pTab7) using three infection times such as 60, 90 and 120 min. Calli were chosen for transformation because regeneration of plants from callus was well established and reproducble for sugarcane. Hossain ef a/. (2004) conducted Agrobacterium-medial ed genetic transformation experment using sugarcane callus, Both co-cultivation and selection times were maintain;d 14 d, Shoots and roots development were obtained within 28 d of culture, The results are shown in the Table Transformed calus of the variety lsd 31 from infection time 60 min showed no regeneration response, and seven plantlets were produced from 90 min infection time and only 3 obtained from 120 min infection time. Totzl 10 planleis were obtaind using 18 pieces of calli. GUS assay was done among randomly selected callus from 120 mn infecton time. Callus of the variety Isd 3'1 from infection iime 120 min showed the highest resulls and same per cent (100%) of callus was GUS positive, and showed blue colour . The resultrs are given in the Table 2 and Figure 1. Matsoka et al. (2001) reported Agrobaclerlum- mediated genetc transformation in sugarcane variety Ni4, and performed GUS assay successfully. They obtained flants from hygromycin resistant transformed callus. putative transformation was detected in both transformed callus and plant by GLJS assay. Arencbia et al. (1998) assessed transformed callus using histochemical GUS assay and produced frst morphologcally transgenic sugarcane plant through Agrobacterium-mediated genetic kansformation. Contrl callus showed no blue colour after GUS assay, Shoot and roots were successfully produced from transformed callus (Fig 3).
1.
Results indicate possibilities of genetic ransformation of foreign genes in sugarcane variety lsd 31 of Bangladesh
5en IA
H
'1.
Effects of infection, co-cultivation, selection and sub-culture on shooting and rooting media on prant regeneration from cafius in varietiy rsd 3r with AL1 (pTab7).
60
14
90 120
6 6
14 14
14 14 14
28
zu
7
?
Table 2. GUS assay of callus of the variety lsd 31 transformed wlth AGLI (pTab7).
Variely
lsd 31 xplant Callus nfection time (min) 120 No of callus assaved for GUS
8
. ("\
't
00
Figure
1.
GUS expression in callus of the variety lsd 3'1 at an infection time 120 min. Transformed callus of the variety lsd 31 (left) and control callus (right).
I
I
Figure
2.
Regeneration of shoots from transformed callus of the variety lsd 31 infected with AGLl (pTab7) for 90 minutes. A: deveopment of shoots; B: transferred to rooting medium.
60
Bangladesh J. Sugarcan
July,2006
REFERENCES Anonymous. 1995 Canetaking la rg-e rsha re of world, suga r o utput. S ugar sugar production in 1994/5. Agra-Europe. January 20, p M7 .
ca
n
Alam, R.; lvannan, Sk. A.; Karim, Z. and Amin, M. N. 2003.'Regeneration of sugarcan e (saccharun officinarun) plantlet from callus. Pakistan Sugar Journal. 1Bj(1):15_19, Arencibia, A.; carmona, E. R.; Tellez, p.; chan,, N,4-l: yu., s-M.; Trujillo, L..E. and oramas, p 1998. An efficient pro tocol for sug_arcane (saccharum spp. L.) trans'ormation mediateo by Agrobacterium ti.ituo,i",, Transgenic Research. 7: 213-222.
'
Arenclbia, A.; Vazquez, R.l.; Prieio, Tellez, p; Carmona, E.R.; Coego, A.: Hernandez, L.; de la Riva, c.A. and _D.; Selman-H.ousein, G. 1997. Transgenic ugarcane plants resistnt to stem borer attack. Molculai greeding. Baksha, R-;Alam, R.; Karim, M. z.; paur, s. K; Hossain, M. A.; rr/iah, M. A. s. and Rahman. A. B. M. N4. 2002. ln vitro shoot tp curture of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) varety. Biotechnorogy. l1i-aliari. Hooykaas, P. J, J, 1990. Transformatjon of plants cells via Agrabacterium. plant
[,401.
Biol.
l3:
327-336.
Hooykaas, P J. J. and Shilperoorl, R. A. 1985, The Ti-plasmid of a Agrobaclerium tumefaciens: A naiurat genetic engireer. Trends in biochem. Sci. 10: 307-309. Hooykaas, P, J. J. and shilperood, R. A. 1992. Agrobacterium and plant genetic engineering. plant 19: '15-38.
[,4o1.
Bio.,
Horsch R. B.; Fry J. B.; Hoffmann, N. L-.; warrroth, [,4.; Eichhortz, D.; Rogers, s. G. and Frarey R. T. .1985. A simpre and general method for transferring genes into plants. Science, 227:1229_1221. Hossain, M, A.; Begum, s. \4jah, M. A. s,; uddin, l\.4. J. and Miah, A. J. 1996. Induction of callus and reqeneration of plants in sugarcane, In: Plant rssue culture, tslam, A. s. (ed), oxford & IBH pub, co. p,,t. iio. ttew Delhi, Calcutra. pp: 76-79. Jefferson, R- A 1987. Assaying chimeric genes in plants: the GUS gene fusion system. plant. Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 387-405. Martn, J. R.; Glvez, G.; de Armas, R.; Espinosa, R,; Vigoa, R. and Len, A. 1982. ln: La cana de azcar en Cuba. Pp,212-224. Editorial Cientfico Tcnica, La Habana, Cuba. Matsuoka, T.; Kuribara, H.; Akiyama, H.; Miura,, H.; Goda, Y; Kusakabe, y; lsshiki, K.; Toyoda, M.; Hino, A. 2001. A multlplex PCR method of detecting iecombinant DNAs from five lines of genetically modified maize. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Japan. 42:24-32.
lVlurashige, T. and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid grow,th and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures.
Register lll J. C.; Peterson, D. J.; Bell, P. J.; BJllock, W p.; Evans, l. J.; Frame, B.; Greenland, A. J.t Higgs, N. S.; Jepson, l.; Jiao, s.; Lewnau, c. J.; Silrick, J. 1r,4. and wilson, H. M. 1994. structure and functjoi"ot selec table and non-selectable transgenes in maize after introduction by particle bombardment. pjant lr/ol. Biol. 25: 95'1-961.