C O N F I D E N T I A L T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Adequate Yearly Progress Campus Data Table Final 2009 AYP Results Campus Name: SMITH HIGH SCHOOL

(057903002) CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH Status: Recognized, Meets AYP 2009-10 School Improvement Program Requirement: None All Students African American Econ. Disadv. Special Education LEP (Measure) LEP (Students) Page 1 of 4

Hispanic

White

Performance: Reading/English Language Arts (AYP Target: 67%) AYP Proficiency Rate 2008-09 Assessments Met Standard Number Tested % Met Standard Student Group %

410 446 92% 100%

66 71 93% 16%

159 182 87% 41%

146 150 97% 34%

175 202 87% 45%

28 31 90% 7%

24 41 59% n/a

n/a 31 n/a 7%

Performance Improvement/Safe Harbor 2007-08 Assessments Met Standard 417 Number Tested 479 % Met Standard 87% Change in % Met Standard 5

71 82 87% 6

151 189 80% 7

146 155 94% 3

168 209 80% 7

22 32 69% 21

23 42 55% 4

n/a 27 n/a

2008-09 AYP Proficiency Rate including the Texas Projection Measure (TPM) Met Standard or TPM Number Tested % Met Standard or TPM 435 446 98% 69 71 97% 174 182 96% 149 150 99% 195 202 97% 30 31 97% 35 41 85%

The final data tables are not masked to protect individual student confidentiality. Individual student information (including aggregate counts of less than 5) in the tables is confidential under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The agency additionally takes the position that the tables at this stage of the accountability review process constitute "agency audit workpapers" not required to be disclosed under the Texas Public Information Act. n/a indicates that the data are not available or applicable A dash (-) indicates there were no students in that group

C O N F I D E N T I A L T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Adequate Yearly Progress Campus Data Table Final 2009 AYP Results Campus Name: SMITH HIGH SCHOOL (057903002) CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH Status: Recognized, Meets AYP 2009-10 School Improvement Program Requirement: None All Students African American Econ. Disadv. Special Education LEP (Measure) LEP (Students) Page 2 of 4

Hispanic

White

Performance: Mathematics (AYP Target: 58%) AYP Proficiency Rate 2008-09 Assessments Met Standard Number Tested % Met Standard Student Group %

332 441 75% 100%

41 70 59% 16%

116 180 64% 41%

135 149 91% 34%

127 199 64% 45%

15 31 48% 7%

19 41 46% n/a

n/a 31 n/a 7%

Performance Improvement/Safe Harbor 2007-08 Assessments Met Standard 336 Number Tested 471 % Met Standard 71% Change in % Met Standard 4

53 82 65% -6

110 184 60% 4

128 154 83% 8

121 204 59% 5

14 31 45% 3

11 40 28% 18

n/a 26 n/a

2008-09 AYP Proficiency Rate including the Texas Projection Measure (TPM) Met Standard or TPM Number Tested % Met Standard or TPM 387 441 88% 53 70 76% 152 180 84% 140 149 94% 164 199 82% 16 31 52% 28 41 68%

The final data tables are not masked to protect individual student confidentiality. Individual student information (including aggregate counts of less than 5) in the tables is confidential under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The agency additionally takes the position that the tables at this stage of the accountability review process constitute "agency audit workpapers" not required to be disclosed under the Texas Public Information Act. n/a indicates that the data are not available or applicable A dash (-) indicates there were no students in that group

C O N F I D E N T I A L T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Adequate Yearly Progress Campus Data Table Final 2009 AYP Results Campus Name: SMITH HIGH SCHOOL (057903002) CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH Status: Recognized, Meets AYP 2009-10 School Improvement Program Requirement: None All Students African American Econ. Disadv. Special Education LEP (Measure) LEP (Students) Page 3 of 4

Hispanic

White

Participation: Reading/English Language Arts (AYP Target: 95%) 2008-09 Assessments Number Participating Total Students Participation Rate Student Group % 2007-08 Assessments Number Participating Total Students Participation Rate 471 471 100% 100% 78 78 100% 17% 193 193 100% 41% 154 154 100% 33% 212 212 100% 45% 35 35 100% 7% 33 33 100% 7%

517 520 99%

92 93 99%

209 211 99%

162 162 100%

226 228 99%

37 37 100%

29 30 97%

Participation: Mathematics (AYP Target: 95%) 2008-09 Assessments Number Participating Total Students Participation Rate Student Group % 2007-08 Assessments Number Participating Total Students Participation Rate 465 465 100% 100% 79 79 100% 17% 190 190 100% 41% 153 153 100% 33% 209 209 100% 45% 35 35 100% 8% 33 33 100% 7%

506 510 99%

90 90 100%

201 204 99%

162 163 99%

218 220 99%

35 35 100%

27 28 96%

C O N F I D E N T I A L T E X A S E D U C A T I O N A G E N C Y Adequate Yearly Progress Campus Data Table Final 2009 AYP Results Campus Name: SMITH HIGH SCHOOL (057903002) CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH Status: Recognized, Meets AYP 2009-10 School Improvement Program Requirement: None All Students African American Econ. Disadv. Special Education LEP (Measure) LEP (Students) Page 4 of 4

Hispanic

White

Graduation Rate Class of 2008 (AYP Target: 70%) Graduates Number in Class Graduation Rate Student Group % 353 377 93.6% 100% 51 58 87.9% 15% 109 119 91.6% 32% 157 160 98.1% 42% 88 99 88.9% 26% 23 28 82.1% 7% 16 19 84.2% 5%

Graduation Rate Class of 2007 Graduates 390 Number in Class 420 Graduation Rate 92.9% Student Group % 100% Change 2007 to 2008 0.7

56 63 88.9% 15% -1.0

107 122 87.7% 29% 3.9

184 190 96.8% 45% 1.3

107 119 89.9% 28% -1.0

23 30 76.7% 7% 5.4

10 15 66.7% 4% 17.5

Decreases in graduation rates may be due to significant changes in the dropout definition beginning with the 2005-06 school year. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2009 AYP Explanation Table All Students Performance: Reading Performance: Math Participation: Reading Participation: Math Other: Graduation Rate Other: Attendance Rate + % X + + + + + African American + + + + Hispanic + + + + White + + + + Econ. Disadv. + + + + Special Education LEP -

Meets AYP Not Evaluated for AYP due to not meeting minimum size criteria, alternative not used, or the measure is not applicable Missed AYP for this performance measure due to the 2% and/or the 1% federal caps Missed AYP for this measure