Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
the contrary anxious for the good of his country, adding that he was severo
y sencillo en su conducta, y que paliaba su arbitrariedad con el ejercicio de
las virtudes mas relevantes en un mandatario, confesses that on the present
occasion this great man committed a grave error. o*q. Costa R., 103; Costa
R. Dec. de garan. y bases, 24 mo.; Id., Col. Ley., viii. 15-36, 41-2; Salv.,
Diano Ofic., May 25, 1875.
*The former was constituted with as many members as there were de
partments, namely, four. The latter was composed of a president, two rela-
tores nscaies, and four justices.
3
He insulted them, however, by providing that they should be under the
surveillance of the authorities. Costa R., Col. Ley., vii. 42.
216 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA.
4
Bonilla segundo jefe. The enemies of the present
rulerwere numerous, and increasing. They called
Morazan to their aid, through General Bermudez of
Peru.
Morazan from Chiriqui in Panama, and after
sailed
Carrillo was to leave the country with a full pledge of safety to his fam
10
ily and property. The convention was signed by Morazan, Villasefior, gen
erals Saget, Saravia, and Rascon, 5 colonels, and the other assenting officers
of all ranks, including 5 Texiguas.
11
Carrillo left the state from Puntarenas. Bonilla was also guaranteed
security. Montufar, Resena Hist., iii. C15-19; Niks Rey., Ixii., 275. Both
Carrillo and Aguilar died out of Costa R. ; the former was killed, and his
murderer executed. Funeral honors were paid in Costa R. to Aguilar, Aug.
25, 1S4G. Costa R., Col Ley., ix. 289-90. The remains of both ex-chiefs were
brought home by Presid. Castro s decree of Nov. 5, 1848. Id., x. 3G5-8; EL
Salvador Retjenerado, June 4, 1842.
la
Dated April 14, 1842. Id., vii. 250-1.
13
A
general order was given to prevent any interference with the elections
on the part of the troops. Copies of Morazan s decrees to undo the evils of
his predecessor, and to
prepare for the reorganization of the state on liberal
principles, are furnished in Id., 236-342. passim; Montufar, Reseda, Hist. s iii.
621-31.
218 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA.
afterward went to Guatemala to complete his studies, and was well treated
and much aided by Juan. Jose Aycinena and Manuel F. Pavoii; and he be
came their most humble henchman. Returning to Costa Rica as a lawyer, he
was appointed after a while a justice of the supreme court. On many occa
sions he proved himself unprincipled, treacherous, and contemptible.
22
Over 100 killed and 200 wounded.
23
He had wanted to go to Tarcoles, expecting to find Saget there, but
was dissuaded by Villaseiior and others.
2t
The Spaniard Espinach, a reactionist of some standing who acted as a
commissioner of the revolutionists, fearing that Morazan s popularity in Car
tago might bring on a counter-movement, and in order to avert it, asked
Morazan to instruct Cabanas to lay down his arms, and to command Saget to
deliver those lie had in Puiitarenas. He assured Morazan his life was in no
peril. His next step was to meet Cabanas at Chomogo, telling him Morazan
was leaving the state by the Matina road with sufficient money, and advising
him to disband his men. Cabanas was deceived, and went alone to Matina,
where lie was taken prisoner.
BLOODY WORK. 221
dependence !
Marure, Efein., 56. Saravia was a son of Miguel Gonzalez Saravia, the
"
The first two named governments saw that for all they had ma-
i (n-uvred to make of the executive of Salvador a mere submissive a^ ent of the
.-istocracy, he had now emancipated himself from its control. Moulitfar,
r<-s(ma
4-5, 115-33; Molina, Bosq. Costal!., 105-0.
JJi*t., iv.
n., Col. Ley., vii. 404-16.
*>Co*t<i
41
Art. 3 stated that the idea was not yet entertained, which later was
formed, of declaring the state to be a sovereign and independent republic.
Art. 5 resolved the question of boundaries with Colombia and Nicaragua upon
CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY. 225
50
post and went off to his home in Cartago. His suc
cessor was Rafael Moya, then president of the sen
51
ate, who exerted himself to do away with localism, and
to promote harmony between the several sections but ;
His removal from the executive seat resulted from the intrigues of a
5r>
1S47, 1-118; Id., Col. Lei/., x. 1-5G; Astabuniaga, Cent. Am., 46-9.
07
Nov. 22, 1848, and promulgated by the executive on the 30th. A law
regulating the election of the supreme authorities was passed Dec. 20th.
D
ta R., Contstit. Polit. (ed. of 1850, 8 ), 1-38; Costa A\, Col. Ley., x. 347-
<
59
Castro had enemies in San Jose. He was accused of bringing aboiit Ga-
llego s dismissal. This assertion was repeated from mouth to mouth, an 1
came to be believed by many. Moreover, some men that he looked on as his
friends suggested to him unwise measures, with the view of damaging his ad
ministration. Unfortunately, congress began to show aristocratic tendencies,
restoring the abolished compellations without opposition on Castro s part.
The title of Excellency was voted to itself, the president, and the supreme
court.
60
Castro and Mora differed on many points. The president s circle consid
ered Mora a dangerous competitor. Congress treated Mora with marked in
difference, though he had restored peace in Alajuela with only 200 men. He
resigned the vice-presidency. An election being ordered, at the second
attempt Manuel Jose Carazo, a friend of Castro, was chosen. Carazo was an
able and well-informed man. He resigned the office on the 24th of Aug.,
but was reflected Sept. 22d. Id., 190, 30(5-7, 310-12, 327-9.
61
Costa R., Inf. Itelaciones, 10-12, 23-5. In Nov. of the same year all
230 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA.
political offenders were pardoned, and a war tax which had been levied on
Alajuelawas ordered refunded. CottaR., Col Ley., x. 209-90, 374-G, 410; ///.,
Pap. Suettos, iios. 3-5; Molina, Boq. Costa /?., 107-8.
Congress took into consideration a number of petitions from influential
02
and Doc., Dept of St., pt ii.), 430-45; Id., 40th cong. 2;1 sess., For. Aff. (Mess.
and Doc,, Dept of St., pt ii.), 277-80; Id., 42d cong. 2d sess., H. Ex. Doc., 1
For. Rol., p. 7 (249-52); Id., 42d cong. 3d sess., For. Rel., p. xxxv. (158-61);
Pan. Gac., Apr. 16, 1876, and numerous other works in various languages.
^Nic. argued that the constitution of Costa R. of 1825 declared her
boundary to be at El Salto, not at La Flor; to which Costa R. replied that the
instrument alluded to was anterior to the federal decree, and therefore could
not embrace Nicoya in Costa Rican territory; buc after this decree the funda
mental laws of Costa R. did take it iii.
232 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA.
70
Ayon did not pretend to deny that the treaty had been concluded by his
govt, and duly ratified by the legislative authority of the two republics. He
alleged that the fundamental law of Nic. established the limits of the state,
embracing within them the territory of Guanacaste; and that the treaty in.
question ignored the Nicaraguan constitution, which prescribed that an amend
ment of it by one legislature must be submitted to the next for ratification;
and this not having been done, there was a radical nullity. Costa R. replied
that the legislative ratification in Nic. had been, not by an ordinary legisla
ture, but by a constituent assembly fully empowered to amend the constitu
tion or frame a new oue. It had been called to make a new fundamental law,
and therefore had a right to establish new boundaries. Moreover, that even
if that assembly had not possessed constituent authority, but had been a
merely ordinary congress, the fact still remained that a number of Nicaraguan
legislatures had held the treaty to be valid and unobjectionable. Some at
tempts have been made in administration circles of Costa R,, much against
public opinion, to annul the treaty, in order to have for a boundary line the
whole right bank of the San Juan, from Greytown or San Juan del Norte to
San Carlos, and Lake Nicaragua to La Flor. Were this supported, and the
treaty set aside, the questions between Costa R. and Nic. would assume a
serious aspect. Montufar, ReseTia Hist., ii. 231-4; Aijon, Cuestioti de Limitest
1-26; Id., Consid. sobre Limites, 1-26.
71
Details may be found in Nic., Mem. Relationes, 1871, 10-16, 29-39; /</.,
Oaceta, Oct. 3, 1868, May 4, 11, 1872, June 7, 1873; Id., Seman. .Ale., Jiuie
6, 1872; Id., Correspond., 1872, 1-24; Id., Continuation de la Correspond. ,
1872, 1-16; U. S. Govt Doc., H. Ex. Doc., 43d cong. 1st sess., pt 2, 732, 735,
739, 743; 44th cong. 1st sess., pt 1, 157, 168; Costa /?., Infomie 1873,
Rel.<
1-6; Id., Pap. Sueltos, Doc. no. 15; Salv., Gaceta Ofic., May 22, 1876; Peralta,
Kio S. Juan.
72
Antonio Zambrana for Costa R., and Francisco Alvarez for Nic. Pan.
Star and Herald, March 5, 1883; Co*ta P., Gaceta, Feb. 3, 1885; U. S. Govt
Doc., 48th cong. 1st sess., H. Ex. Doc pt 1, 59-61.
>3
234 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA
\ sts-,s%,.V
I
7"|
nW-y ;- ^^"
""6^%"
ft- ,c"
pi
^
COSTA RICA.
73
An is given in Montufar, Resena Hist.
extract of that treaty i. 289-90. ,
74
The royal commission Diego de Artieda Cherino, governor, captain-
of
general of Costa R., issued in 1573, fixed the boundaries of the province from
the embocadura del Desaguadero 6 rio San Juan de Nicaragua hasta la
frontera de Veraguas en el Mar Atlantico, y desde los linderos de Nicoya
liasta los valles de Chiriqui en el Pacifico. Molina, Bosq. Costa R., 14; Id.,
Cos a R. y Niieva Granada, 9-10, 10-35. Felipe Molina being in the service
of Costa R,, and intrusted with the defence of her interests, his assertions
might be by some deemed biassed; but the testimony of Juarros, the historian
of Guatemala, who wrote with the official docs before him, is not open to the
same objection. He says, speaking of Costa R., sus terminos por el mar del
norte, son desde la boca del rio San Juan hasta el Escudo de Veraguas; y por
cl sur, desde el no de Alvarado, raya divisoria de la provincia de Nicaragua,
liasta el rio de Boruca, termino del reino de Tierra Firme. Montufar, Resena
Hist., ii. 230.
DISPUTED TERRITORY. ?35
Rica s claims.
Several diplomatic efforts were fruitlessly made to
8
fix the
boundary. The last one was made at San
The by him was that made in 1810, at
75
territorial division recognized
which time no New Granadan authority had a footing in Cent. Am. territory.
A representation of the ayuntamiento of Cartago to the Sp. cdrtes in 1813
says: Costa Rica tiene por limites de su territorio el ric de Chiriqui que la
separa de la provincia de Panama. C6rtes, Diario, 1813, xix. 404.
70
Contract of Col Galindo, as agent of the govt. Molina, Bosq. Costa R. t
100-1.
77
Copy of correspond, between the gov. of Veraguas and that of Costa R.
Montiifar, Itesefia Hist., ii. 272-3; Mosq. Correspond., 22-5; Pan. t Docs. OJic. t
in Pan. Col. Doc*., no. 31, pp. 62, 06-70; Id., Star and Herald, Oct. 15. 16,
1880.
78
During the Walker war, a treaty was made at San Jose between P. A.
Herran for Colombia, and Joaquin R Calvo for Costa Rica, which does not
follow the line on Molina s map. Modifications were made to it at Bogota,
and ratifications were never exchanged. Later on Jose M. Castro went to
236 REPUBLIC OF COSTA RICA.
Bogota and negotiated another treaty, which did not stipulate Molina s line.
This treaty was not ratified by either govt. The next attempt was made by
Ji. Correoso, 011 behalf of Colombia. His negotiations were mostly verbal,
disregarding arguments for the straight line between Punta de Buriea and
the E.sciulo de Veraguas; and alleging that on the N., N. E., W., and N. W.
of that line were Colombian settlements, which, under the constitution of
his country could not be coded. A treaty was entered into, however, which
did not obtain the ratification of either government. In. Costa R. it was con
sidered a ruinous one. Correoso was charged in Colombia with having made
a damaging arrangement. Pan., Gactta Ixtmo, Oct. 20, 184i; Id., Cr6n. Ojic.,
Feb. 0, 1853; Id., Boktui Ojic., Dec. 25, 1870; Pan., Gnceta, June 15, 1871,
June 19, 1872, Aug. 22, 29, Oct. 31, 1874, May 21, 1876, July 25, Aug. 4,
22, Sept. 20, Oct. 13, Nov. 10, 21, 1878, July 11, Sept. 12, Oct. 17, 28, 31.
188J; Pan., Mem. Sec. Gob., 1879, 13-14, 35-42; Colombia, Din-h Ojic., Feb.
2o, 1876; Cotta R., Mem. Rd., 1851, 5; Id., Col. Let/., xiv. 54-5, 100-1; Id.,
Infertile Clo .n., 1880, 2-4; U. S. Govt DOM., H. Ex. Doc. 41, p. 64-5, vi. 35th
cong. 2d sess.
Ratified by the executive, and sanctioned bv the gran consejo iiacional,
<u
of Costa R., Dec. 27, 30, 1880. Pan., Gaeefa, Jam 16, 1881.
80
Carazo, the vice-president, had done the same Oct. 26th. Costa R., Col.
Ley., xi. 216.
81
At the same time he was declared a benemerito, and
the founder of the
rep. of Costa R. Id., 157-8, 224-5; El Costaricen*e, Nov. 17, 1849. The op
position, however, made severe comments on his policy as reviewed by him
self. A not. d la renuncia, in Cent. Am. Miseel. Doe., no. 20.
82
Mora was a Costa Rican of rare intellectual powers, quite conversant
with her affairs; a wealthy merchant, who had travelled abroad, and by his
frankness and liberality won a well-deserved popularity. El Coxtaricense, Nov.
JS, Dec. 1, 1849; Coft-t /?., Col. Ley., xi. 225-6, 234-5. Francisco M. Orea-
irumo was elected vice-pres. Jan. 30, 1850. Id., 241-2; Costn R., Gactta, Feb.
2 1850.
f
PRESIDENT MORA. 237
June
1853, the president s salary was raised to $5,000 a year. Costa
6,
If., xii. 236-7, 247-8; Id., Gaceta, July 23, 1853; IfomL, Gac&i
Col Ley.,
OJic., June 20, 1853; Wagner, Coxta R., 171-2, 506-8, 296-7.
87
Min. Calvo s rept to cong. May 10, 1854. The chamber on the 5th of
June sanctioned all the acts of the govt, and passed a vote of thanks and
congratulation to the president, por el acierto y prudencia con qu j la ha re-
gido. Costa R., Mem. Rel, 15.