Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Enteral nutrition (EN) is defined as the delivery of nutrients by tube or by mouth into GI tract. Terms EN & tube feeding are thus used interchangeably. The goal of EN is to provide calories, macronutrients, & micronutrients to those patients who are unable to achieve these requirements from oral diet. EN is the preferred method of specialized nutrition support in many patients who are at risk of malnutrition.
Indications for EN
Suitable candidates: those who cannot or will not eat sufficient amount to meet nutritional requirements, those who exhibit sufficient functioning GI tract to allow absorption of nutrients, those in whom method of enteral access can be safely obtained. Critically ill patients who are endotracheally intubated for mechanical ventilation represent a large percentage of patients requiring EN. Many of these patients may have gastric motility & emptying (sepsis, GI surgery, anesthetic agents, opioid analgesics, diabetic gastroparesis). placing tip of feeding tube into duodenum, or preferably into jejunum.
Contraindications to EN
The only absolute contraindications for EN are mechanical obstruction & necrotizing enterocolitis. Severe diarrhea, protracted vomiting, enteric fistulae, severe GI hemorrhage, & intestinal dysmotility may result in significant challenges to successful use of EN.
EN versus PN
1. Clinical studies comparing EN to PN in critically ill demonstrate in infectious complications Animal studies: EN prevents bacterial entry across gut. EN appears to help maintain intestinal mucosal structure & function, which may prevent translocation of gut bacteria to portal or lymphatic circulation. EN is preferred over PN for feeding of critically ill patients requiring specialized nutrition support. 2. EN is > physiologic than PN in terms of nutrient utilization fewer metabolic complications, such as glucose intolerance & insulin requirements. 3. EN stimulates bile flow risk of developing cholestasis, gallbladder sludge & gallstones. 4. EN avoids potential infectious & technical complications associated with placement & use of central venous access device required for PN. 5. EN is <costly than PN when all factors are considered.
Short-Term Access
Short-term enteral access is generally easier to initiate, < invasive, & < costly than long-term access. The most frequently used routes for short-term enteral access are nasogastric [NG], nasoduodenal, or nasojejunal. These tubes are used in hospitalized patient when anticipated tube feeding duration is < 4-6 weeks. Orogastric route is generally reserved for patients in whom nasopharyngeal area is inaccessible or in young infants who are obligate nasal breathers. These routes do not require surgical intervention are least invasive. Feeding tube can be inadvertently pulled out relatively easily.
Long-Term Access
Feeding tubes used for short-term enteral access are usually not optimal for long-term use because of patient discomfort, long-term complications, & mechanical failures that develop over time. Long-term access should generally be considered when EN is anticipated for > 4-6 weeks. Many techniques can be used to establish long-term access, including laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, and fluoroscopy. Long-term enteral access options include gastrostomy, jejunostomy, esophagostomy, & pharyngostomy.
Administration Methods
continuous, cyclic, bolus methods May be accomplished by: syringe, gravity, infusion pump-controlled techniques
Continuous method
In hospitalized patient, is most commonly used for initiation, & is generally preferred method in critically ill. < likely to result in abdominal distension, vomiting, & diarrhea than intermittent bolus method. Is preferred when EN is delivered into small intestine (better tolerance), may also be preferred in patients who have limited absorptive capacity due to rapid GI transit or severely impaired digestion. Delivery system: feeding reservoir or bag attached to extension set that is connected to infusion pump. nursing time because routine checks of enteral infusion are needed. For adults, EN infusion rates is generally 50-125 mL/h. In children, 1-2 mL/kg per hour can be started with advancements every 4-8 hours until the goal rate is achieved with good GI tolerance. Disadvantage: cost & inconvenience associated with pump & administration sets.
Other methods
Cyclic Patient who is not eating well during the day because of complaints of fullness & lack of appetite may benefit from trial of cyclic EN with enteral feeding held during the day & infused only at night. Patient is free from pump during the day allowing > mobility useful for home patient or patient requiring rehabilitation. May be used in patients with either gastric or small bowel access. Bolus Is most commonly used for patients in long-term care settings who have gastrostomy. Delivery of enteral feeding formulation is usually over 5-10 min. Syringe is used to instill feeding solution into tube. Instillation volume: 240-500 mL x 4-6 TD.
Protein Composition
Enteral formulations may also contain protein sources that are partially hydrolyzed as peptides or L-amino acids. As molecular form of protein in size, osmotic load within enteral formula is increased. Many EN formulations contain combinations of intact & partially hydrolyzed protein sources. Conditionally essential amino acids: glutamine & arginine are nonessential amino acids but during periods of high physiologic stress, patients may become deficient formulations targeted for critically ill may be supplemented with glutamine &/or arginine. Further research is required to determine potential benefits & harm associated with glutamine-enriched enteral feeding formulations. There is no consensus on whether arginine-supplemented enteral formulations should be used in septic patients (might be harmful).
Carbohydrate Composition
Usually provides the major source of calories. Polymeric or intact enteral formulations contain starches & glucose polymers, which require digestion to monosaccharide moieties prior to intestinal absorption Elemental carbohydrates such as glucose & galactose contribute significantly to osmolality of enteral formulations, which is associated with feeding intolerance polymeric entities are preferred. Glucose polymers provide a useful carbohydrate source that is tolerated by most individuals: large chains that provide minimal osmotic load, yet are absorbed easily. Almost all commercially available enteral feeding formulations used in adults & older children are lactosefree - Why??? Infant formulas are available with or without lactose.
Fiber Content
Fiber, as soy polysaccharides, has been added to several enteral feeding formulations intended for use in both children & adults (5.9-24 g/L of dietary fiber). Infant formulas do not contain fiber, with the exception of one formula intended for use in infants with diarrhea Potential benefits of fiber are: - trophic effects on colonic mucosa + promotion of sodium & water absorption within colon. - may help regulate bowel function in both normal individuals & in those with altered colonic motility. - resulting short-chain fatty acids are excellent energy source. Fiber supplementation may be beneficial when long-term EN is required or in patients who experience diarrhea or constipation while receiving fiber-free enteral formulation.
Osmolality
Iso-osmolar is considered to be ~300 mOsm/kg. Formulations that contain sucrose or glucose, dipeptides & tripeptides, & amino acids are generally hyperosmolar. caloric density also osmolality of enteral formulation. Osmolality of commercially available enteral feeding formulations ranges is 300-900 mOsm/kg. AAP: for infants ~ 450 mOsm/kg or <. Symptoms of gastric retention, diarrhea, abdominal distension, N&V have been attributed to enteral formulations having high osmolality (but: clinical evidence is lacking).
Standard Polymeric
Are ~ isotonic (300 mOsm/L), provide ~ 1 kcal/mL, & are composed of intact nutrients in a well-proportioned mix of carbohydrate, fat, & protein dietary fiber. Can provide nutrient requirements of majority of adults & children > 10 years of age receiving EN Nonprotein calorie-to-nitrogen ratio of these products is ~125:1-150:1. This ratio is a useful parameter for assessing protein density in relation to calories provided. To maintain isotonicity, products within this category are not sweetened, making them not very palatable & generally only suited for tube feeding & not oral supplementation; however, flavored products are available.
High Protein
Nonprotein calorie-to-nitrogen ratio < 125:1 The lower the ratio, the higher protein density in relation to calories provided. Candidates: patients with trauma, burns, pressure sores, surgical wounds, high fistula output, & other critically ill patients (estimated protein requirements >1.5 g/kg per day). May also be beneficial in mechanically ventilated patients who are receiving propofol for sedation (vehicle is a soybean fat emultion that contains 1.1 kcal/mL) allowing provision of protein requirements while minimizing risk of overfeeding.
Elemental/Peptide Based
Contain protein &/or fat components that are hydrolyzed into smaller, predigested forms. Contain portion of the protein as dipeptides & tripeptides & < free amino acids (to optimize protein absorption in patients with impaired digestive or absorptive capacity). Are generally >in fat & use MCTs in varying proportions. Indications are not clearly established. Patients who do not tolerate standard, intact nutrient formulations as a result of malabsorption might be candidates for trial of peptide-based formulation. Products that have higher percentages of MCTs & small amounts of LCT may be beneficial in chronic pancreatitis & cystic fibrosis, untreated celiac disease, biliary atresia or severe cholestasis, or chylothorax.
Disease Specific
Conditions for which specialized enteral feeding formulations exist include renal & hepatic failure, pulmonary disease including ARDS, DM, wound healing, & metabolic stress. Research supporting efficacy of specialized enteral feeding formulations is minimal. Specialized enteral formulations designed to modulate inflammatory response in patients with severe metabolic stress have been referred to as immune-enhancing formulations or immunonutrition: supplemented with glutamine, arginine, branched-chain amino acids, nucleotides, & omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Positive results: patients undergoing elective GI surgery, major cancer surgery of head & neck, & patients with severe trauma. Immune-enhancing formulations are associated with mortality in patients with preexisting severe sepsis.
Disease Specific
In ARDS, improved outcomes from using low carbohydrate formulation supplemented with specific fatty acids (eicosapentaenoic acid & -linolenic acid) & antioxidants have been documented. There are no disease-specific enteral products currently marketed for use in infants or children from 1 to 10 years of age. The use of modular supplements is often necessary in children with special nutrition needs.
Oral Supplements
In general, are not intended for tube feeding, but to enhance oral diet. Are sweetened to improve taste are hypertonic (~450700 mOsm/kg). Osmolality is generally not a problem in patient with functioning GIT. In tube-fed patient, sweetened product is unnecessary & may contribute to GI intolerance, particularly diarrhea. Powder supplements that are mixed with milk should be avoided in lactose-intolerant patients. In addition to liquid supplements, puddings, gelatins, bars, & milkshake-like supplements are available.
Modular Products
Powder or liquid (i.e., protein, carbohydrate, or fat) may be is used to supplement commercially available enteral formulation. May be necessary, especially in children, to achieve nutrient mix not supplied by single product. Formulations available in powder or concentrate can be also mixed with < water than needed for standard dilution to deliver > nutrients in < volume. Infant formulas generally are concentrated beyond their standard concentration in this way. Mixing process potential for contamination & incorrect preparation. Human milk fortifiers add additional calories, protein, & minerals & have been shown to improve nutritional outcomes in human milk-fed premature infants.
Rehydration
Oral rehydration formulations are useful in maintaining hydration or treating dehydration in adult & pediatric patients with high GI output. Are available commercially in powder or liquid form or can be extemporaneously compounded. Can be administered orally or given via feeding tube. Glucose content is important because it stimulates active transport systems passive sodium & water uptake simultaneously with glucose may fecal water loss & generate positive electrolyte balance.
Metabolic Complications
Are similar to those associated with PN, but incidence tends to be < (EN is frequently administered at < rates than PN) Complications related to hydration & electrolyte imbalance & altered glucose control are observed > frequently in critically ill patients, especially those with underlying organ dysfunction. Patients receiving long-term EN at home may only require laboratory monitoring every 2-3 months, depending on their clinical status. In addition to macronutrient content, it is important to evaluate actual content of water & micronutrients provided by enteral formulations, especially in critically ill patients. Supplemental fluid & electrolytes may be required in some. Patients who have fluid retention or serum electrolytes, may need > concentrated formulation or containing < of a particular nutrient.
GI Complications
Include N&V, abdominal distension, cramping, aspiration, diarrhea, & constipation. For patients receiving tube feeding into stomach, gastric residual volumes are widely used as indicator of tolerance (volume of contents in stomach measured by using syringe & aspirating from large-bore NG or gastrostomy tube. Patients with high gastric residual volumes may be at > risk of vomiting &/or aspiration. Frequency of measuring gastric residual volumes is generally 4-8 hours. In adults, definition of high residual volume ranges from > 200 mL to > 500 mL. In children, residual volumes > twice bolus volume or twice hourly infusion rate for continuous gastric feedings are considered excessive.
GI Complications (contd)
Symptoms such as abdominal distension, fullness, bloating, & discomfort should also be assessed (> reliable indicators of EN intolerance). Trend in gastric residual volumes is generally > important than isolated high measurement. in tube feeding rate may be warranted. Abruptly stopping tube feeding should be reserved for patients with overt regurgitation or aspiration. Gastric residual volumes should generally be returned to patient unless they are excessive (> 500 mL in adults). It may be beneficial to initiate prokinetic agent e.g. metoclopramide If high gastric residual volumes persist, transpyloric feeding tube may be considered for feeding into small bowel. Trial of PPI or H2RA, use of narcotics, sedatives, or other agents that may delay gastric emptying may help.
Aspiration pneumonia
Is the most serious complication & is potentially lifethreatening. Risk factors: - previous aspiration episode, - LOC, - neuromuscular disease, - structural airway or GI tract abnormalities, - endotracheal intubation, - vomiting, - persistently high gastric residual volumes, - prolonged presence in supine position. Identification of these risk factors, along with close monitoring of gastric residual volumes, is recommended for management of critically ill patients receiving tube feeding.
Diarrhea
The reported incidence in patients receiving EN is 20-70% When monitoring for diarrhea, stool frequency, consistency, & volume should be evaluated & previous bowel habits should be considered. One commonly accepted definition of diarrhea is > 3-5 liquid stools per day or > 250-500 mL/day (10 mL/kg per day in children) stool output for at least 2 consecutive days. Single loose stool does not constitute diarrhea or require intervention. Tube feeding-related factors that may contribute to diarrhea: - too rapid delivery or advancement of formula, - intolerance to formula composition, - administering large volumes of feeding into small bowel, - formula contamination.
Diarrhea (contd)
If diarrhea occurs when using fiber-free formulation, consider switching to fiber-containing formulation. If using high-fat formulation, it may be beneficial to switch to formulation lower in fat or having proportion of fat supplied as MCTs. If protein malabsorption is suspected, switching from intact protein to peptide-based source may be beneficial. Avoid lactose-containing enteral formulations (majority of products are lactose-free). Assess risk of bacterial contamination of formula & take steps to potential risk factors. Infectious etiologies should be excluded, Pharmacologic intervention to control severe diarrhea: use of opiates, diphenoxylate, & loperamide.
Diarrhea (contd)
Common cause of diarrhea unrelated to tube feeding is drugs, particularly broad-spectrum antibiotics & sorbitol contained in many liquid medication formulations. In addition, many drugs available in liquid form are hyperosmolar, which may also contribute to diarrhea. All medications should be evaluated for their potential contribution. Infectious causes, such as antibiotic-induced bacterial overgrowth by Clostridium difficile or other intestinal flora, need to be considered. Diarrhea also may occur as result of malabsorption, secondary to underlying disease state or condition.
Mechanical Complications
Feeding tube occlusion: result of improper administration of medications &/or flushing technique. Kinking of tube also may cause occlusion. Tube should be flushed with at least 30 mL of water before & after administering any medication (children < 30 mL depending on size of tube). Frequency of flushing should be at least Q 8 hrs during continuous feeding & before & after each intermittent feeding. If tube occlusion occurs, attempt to irrigate tube with warm water should be made. Some success has been shown with pancreatic enzymes mixed in sodium bicarbonate. Declogging devices that are specifically designed to unclog feeding tubes are available - either mechanically break through or remove occlusion or provide applicator & syringe prefilled with pancreatic enzymes etc. targeted to restore patency.
DrugNutrient Interactions
One of the most studied interactions: phenytoin & enteral feeding phenytoin bioavailability phenytoin serum concentrations by as much 50-75%, possibly as result of binding of phenytoin to calcium caseinates or protein hydrolysates in enteral formulation. Patients typically require higher than normal phenytoin doses while receiving EN. Patient's clinical response & phenytoin serum concentrations should be monitored closely if phenytoin is given enterally during continuous enteral feeding & after its discontinuation. Some clinicians choose to hold feeding for 1-2 hours before & after phenytoin administration to minimize interaction.
Developing EN regimen