Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 63

Environmental & Energy DATA

Q2 2011

BOOK

A Collection of Practical Environmental, Sustainability, & Energy Data

Sponsored by:

Environmental & Energy DATA

BOOK

Welcome to Environmental Leaders quarterly Environmental & Energy Data Book, which supplies busy executives and research teams with a collection of charts presenting environmental, sustainability and energy-related data. Our goal is to make the job of gathering essential information and metrics a bit easier for corporate decision-makers.

Our data comes from research, data, government and corporate outlets. You may share, for noncommercial purposes, the whole presentation or any page as long as you preserve credits to our sponsor, the companies that supply the source data and EnvironmentalLeader.com.

Table of Contents
Energy . Facilities .... Sustainability & Strategy .. Management Systems & Reporting .. Carbon Costs & Markets .. Marketing & Public Opinion .... Transportation & Supply Chain ... Emissions .... Waste & Recycling .... About Hara .... About Environmental Leader . About EL PRO .
4

p. 6 p. 14 p. 21 p. 30 p. 34 p. 39 p. 45 p. 52 p. 57 p. 61 p. 62 p. 63

Index of Charts (in slide order)


Whats Holding Up Corporate Energy Efficiency Initiatives? Top 10 On-Site Green Power Generation Top 10 Green Power Purchasers Top 10 100% Green Power Purchasers Top 10 U.S. Utilities by Demand Side Management Investment, 2005-2010 Solar Policy Supported by Industry Executives Primary Energy Use in US Commercial Buildings End-Use CO2 Emissions by U.S. Commercial Building Type LEED Certified Buildings in the US Top Cities for Cost Savings from Energy Star Buildings Whats Holding Up LED Adoption? Evaluation Criteria of Lighting Systems Total Sustainability Spending by Global Firms in Australia, Canada, US & UK Companies Concerns About Climate Change Reason for Corporate Climate Change Strategy Time Until Sustainability Tipping Point is Reached, View of Global CEOs What Global CEOs Say Needs To Happen To Reach Sustainability Tipping Point Most Popular Sustainability Goals Corporate Sustainability Actions Taken Over The Past 12 Months How Old Are Enterprise EHS Systems? Carbon Management Software vs. Services Spending Global Reporting Initiative Growth Trend Voluntary Carbon Markets Value & Volume Environmental Costs for Global Corporate Economy, 2008 and Projections for 2050 Cost of Carbon and Emission Levels in 2030 Public Concern Over Environmental Issues Public Perceptions of Global Warming Consumer Intent to Buy Green Products Top 10 Global Green Brands Who Should Police Green Product Claims? 2011 Vehicle Models, Fuel Economy Leaders Plug-In Electric Vehicles What Influences their Purchase? Shippers Position on Sustainability Investments Ecological Footprint of Food Production Where are Most Sustainable Packaging Efforts Directed? Global Tropical Production Forests World Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Region Federal Governments Total Carbon Footprint Annex I Parties' Emission Reduction Targets from 16th Conference of Parties U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Gas, 2009 Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Recovery, Containers and Packaging, 2009 Plastics Recycling Access by Materials Municipal Solid Waste, Paper and Paperboard, Generated in 2009 Corporate Decision-Makers Views On Energy Management & Efficiency Incentives FSTE 100 Companies Buying Carbon Offsets

1. Energy
Whats Holding Up Corporate Energy Efficiency Initiatives? Corporate Decision-Makers Views On Energy Management & Efficiency Incentives Top 10 On-Site Green Power Generation Top 10 Green Power Purchasers Top 10 100% Green Power Purchasers Top 10 100% Green Power Purchasers Top 10 U.S. Utilities by Demand Side Management Investment, 2005-2010 Solar Policy Supported by Industry Executives

Whats Holding Up Corporate Energy Efficiency Initiatives?


(% of respondents)

30% 19% 12% 9% 9%

Lack of funding to pay for improvements Insufficient payback/ROI. Uncertainty regarding savings/performance. Lack of awareness about opportunities Lack of technical expertise to evaluate/execute projects

Source: Johnson Controls, "Energy Efficiency Indicators, 2011 Global Results," June 2011

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Corporate Decision-Makers Views On Energy Management & Efficiency Incentives


(% of respondents)
81%

Corporations are moving toward energy efficiency in 2011 with 70 percent of respondents identifying energy management as an "extremely" or "very important" issue, up from 60 percent in 2010. More respondents are concerned about energy prices this year, with 81 percent saying that they think energy prices will be a bigger expense, compared to 60 percent in 2010.
60%

70%

69%

53% 41% 29% 18%

Energy management is Believe that energy "extremely" or "very prices will increase over important" next 12 months 2010

Using or considering grants, rebates or tax credits 2011

Influence of gov't incentives is "extremely" or "very significant"

Johnson Controls, "Energy Efficiency Indicators, 2011 Global Results," June 2011

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Top 10 On-Site Green Power Generation


Annual Green Power Usage of EPA Green Power Partners (kWh millions)

Kimberly-Clark Corp. City of San Diego, CA U.S. Air Force BMW Manufacturing Co. (Greer, SC) Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Calif. & Texas) City of San Jose, CA City of San Francisco, CA Nassau County, NY SC Johnson & Son Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts 37.2 31.9 31.6 29.1 25.5 23.7 69.0 62.0 61.9

176.5

Source: EPA Green Power Partnership, April 2011

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Top 10 Green Power Purchasers


Annual Green Power Usage of EPA Green Power Partners (kWh millions)

Intel Corporation Kohl's Department Stores Whole Foods Market Commonwealth of Pennsylvania City of Houston, TX Starbucks Johnson & Johnson Staples City of Dallas, TX HSBC North America

2,502 1,418 818 500 438 422 417 342 303 300

Source: EPA Green Power Partnership, April 2011

10

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Top 10 100% Green Power Purchasers


Annual Green Power Usage of EPA Green Power Partners (kWh millions)
Kohl's Department Stores Whole Foods Market HSBC North America U.S. EPA

1,418 818 300 262 240 170 157 116 115 97

TD Bank, N.A.

Deutsche Bank

Pearson, Inc. Mohawk Fine Papers Inc. The World Bank Group The Dannon Company, Inc.

Source: EPA Green Power Partnership, April 2011

11

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

(US$ thousands)

Top 10 U.S. Utilities by Demand Side Management Investment, 2005-2010


Pacific Gas & Electric $585,834 $493,897 $200,320 $143,711 $140,001 $132,366 $122,606 $119,571 $117,740 $88,490

Californias two biggest utilities, Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and Southern California Edison (SCE), led in DSM investment by a wide margin. Californias past scrapes in the electricity sector and most recently legislation passed by the California State Assembly to mandate the use of renewable energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, helped spur the

Southern California Edison Florida Power & Light San Diego Gas & Electric New York Power Authority Public Service Electric & Gas Baltimore Gas & Electric Massachusetts Electric PacifiCorp Progress Energy Florida

investment.
Source: Zpryme, March 2011

12

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

(% of respondents who want policy implemented or maintained)


Renewable energy credits / Renewable portfolio standards

Solar Policy Supported by Industry Executives


30%

The most popular solar policy that industry executives would like to see implemented or maintained in key market was that for renewable energy credits (RECs) or renewable portfolio standards, with 30 percent saying that such policy would benefit their interests, followed by feed-in tariffs, with 20 percent of attendees seeing the benefits. 16 percent cited tax incentives, such as the United States'
Other Tax incentives Demand-side supports (e.g., debt guarantees, export assurances) Grants Supply-side supports (e.g., manufacturer tax credits, debt guarantees) Feed-in tariffs

20%

16%

15%

9%

7%

3%

incentive tax credit (ITC).

Source: Bloomberg New Energy Finance, April 2011

13

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

2. Facilities
Primary Energy Use in US Commercial Buildings End-Use CO2 Emissions by U.S. Commercial Building Type LEED Certified Buildings in the US Top Cities for Cost Savings from Energy Star Buildings Whats Holding Up LED Adoption? Evaluation Criteria of Lighting Systems

14

Primary Energy Use in US Commercial Buildings


% of total
5.5%
Lighting Space Heating

13.2% 2.0% 3.2% 4.1% 6.3%

25.5%

Space Cooling Ventilation Water Heating Electronics Refrigeration

14.2% 6.8% 6.0% 13.1%

Computers Cooking Other Statistical adjustment

* This chart includes 1 quad of energy (5.5%) that is a statistical adjustment by the Energy Information Administration to reconcile two divergent data sources.

Source: Urban Land Institute, 2010

15

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

End-Use CO2 Emissions by U.S. Commercial Building Type


% of total
Other Retail 5% Lodging 7% Health Care 8% Food Service 6% Office 19%

Public Assembly 5% Public Safety 2% Shopping Malls 13%

Food Sales 5% Education 12% Other 5%

Houses of Worship 2% Warehouse and Storage 7% Service 4%

* This chart includes 1 quad of energy (5.5%) that is a statistical adjustment by the Energy Information Administration to reconcile two divergent data sources.

Source: Urban Land Institute, 2010

16

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

LEED Certified Buildings in the US


(Square feet, millions)

250

236
200

Certified Silver Gold Platinum


136 169 148

150

100

79

77

Millions

50

30 20
0 2001-2005 2006 2007

51 40 3
2008 2009

25 8
2010

13

11 2

10

14 2

16 17 21 3

Source: USGBC, March 2011

17

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Top Cities for Cost Savings from Energy Star Buildings (Ranked by cost savings in US$ millions)
$93.9 $88.3

$73.9 $69.4 $62.3

$50.2 $40.3 $36.4 $33.7 $29.6 $23.9 $19.7 $15.4 $14.3 $12.3 $11.1 $9.6 $9.1 $8.6 $8.3

Source: U.S. EPA, March 2011

18

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Whats Holding Up LED Adoption?


(% of respondents, ranking as important)

96% 83% 81%


19

Initial investment is the biggest barrier to LED use -96% of respondents considered this a barrier. Concerns about a lack of product standardization and interchangeability are another issue, with 83% seeing this as a barrier. 81% or respondents said that a lack of specific information on the return on investment was an obstacle.

Source: Osram Sylvania, September 2010

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Evaluation Criteria of Lighting Systems


(% of respondents, ranking as important)
Energy consumption Lifetime operating, maintainence costs Suitability of lighting design for the tasks Time before maintenance or replacement Initial costs Design compatibility, aesthetics Easy integration with other building systems Impact of lighting on environment Costs to dispose or recycle 59% 37% 58% 36% 57% 37% 50% 43% 49% 45% 40% 53% 34% 48% 31% 53% 21% 43%

The top three "very important" considerations for lighting decision-makers were energyefficiency (59% of respondents), lifetime operating costs and maintenance (58%), and suitability of the lighting design (57%). Short-term maintenance costs and initial investment round out the top five evaluation criteria, with about half, 50% and 49% respectively, ranking these criteria as important to the decision-making process.
20

Very important

Important/somewhat important

Source: Osram Sylvania, September 2010

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

3. Sustainability & Strategy


Total Sustainability Spending by Global Firms in Australia, Canada, US & UK Companies Concerns About Climate Change Reason for Corporate Climate Change Strategy Time Until Sustainability Tipping Point is Reached, View of Global CEOs What Global CEOs Say Needs To Happen To Reach Sustainability Tipping Point Most Popular Sustainability Goals Corporate Sustainability Actions Taken Over The Past 12 Months

21

Total Sustainability Spending by Global Firms in Australia, Canada, US & UK


(Sustainability spending per US$ billion)
$70

The growth of investment in sustainable business programs will be between 50 and 100 percent higher in 2013 than in 2011.
Sustainability spending per US$ billion

$60

$50

$40

$30

$20

$10

$0 2010 2011 2012 2013

Source: Verdantix, June 2011

22

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Companies Concerns About Climate Change


(% of companies, who said "high" or "very high" risk)
Water scarcity Increasing costs for natural resources, raw materials Energy security Threats to human health Greater exposure to natural disasters, changing weather Transportation risks Deterioration of water quality Risk of flood, drought, impact on coastal resources Decreased agricultural productivity Food security Threats to ecosystem and biodiversity 0% 10% 19% 18% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 34% 26% 26% 38% 43% 49% 47% 55% 55%

Source: World Resource Institute, June 2011

23

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Reason for Corporate Climate Change Strategy


(% of respondents)
73% 73% 73%

Employee motivation and brand improvement have about doubled from 2009 to 2010 and product differentiation has also become more important. This means that more members
24% 38% 47% 41% 41% 60% 59% 59%

47% 41%

47%

address the risks of climate change driven by investors, to increasingly leverage opportunities of climate change for top line growth.
2009 2010 Source: Carbon Disclosure Project, 2011
Employee motivation Brand improvement Product differentiation Risk management Compliance Cost reductions Efficiency

24

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Time Until Sustainability Tipping Point is Reached, View of Global CEOs


(% of respondents)

3% 17%

10%

0-5 years 5-10 years 10-15 years More than 15 years

26%

44%

Will never be reached

Source: United Nations "Global Compact Annual Review 2010," June 2011

26

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

What Global CEOs Say Needs To Happen To Reach Sustainability Tipping Point
(% who say initiative is "very important" or "important)

89% 88% 86% 85% 84%


27

Majority of consumers demand products/services that address sustainability challenges. Educational systems to develop skills needed for future leaders to address sustainability. Accurate valuation by investors of sustainability in long-term investments. Greater value placed on a company's sustainability activity by shareholders & investors. Boards of Directors hold management accountable for sustainability objectives.
Source: United Nations "Global Compact Annual Review 2010," June 2011

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Most Popular Sustainability Goals


(% of companies)

We have an internal goal

We have a public goal

While companies readily promote efforts and goals surrounding GHG emissions,

21%

36% 34%

they are hesitant to announce public goals for hazardous materials and packaging.
79% 57% 45% 24% 52%

28%

31%

24%

34%

45%

41%

45% 24%

GHG emissions

Overall energy consumption

Solid waste

Hazardous materials

Water

Recycling

Renewable energy consumption

Packaging

Source: Green Researchs Sustainability Executive Survey, June 2011

28

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Corporate Sustainability Actions Taken Over The Past 12 Months


% of respondents who say their companies have taken these actions

72% 69% 67% 65% 61%

Improving Energy Efficiency.

Reducing products environmental footprint.

Cutting emissions or pollutants Improving environment around facilities

Enhancing impact on local communities

Source: Economist Intelligence Unit survey, October 2010 / KPMG 2011

29

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

4. Management Systems & Reporting


How Old Are Enterprise EHS Systems? Carbon Management Software vs. Services Spending Global Reporting Initiative Growth Trend

30

(% of respondents)

How Old Are Enterprise EHS Systems?

End users EHS MIS Apps are aging. In a survey this year of National Association for Environmental Management
23% 35%

40%

41% 39%

32% 26%

32%

(NAEM) members, as well as attendees at an NAEM conference, over 41 percent of respondents said they have had their systems for five years or more.

19% 14%

19% 17% 14%

18% 16% 10%

1 year old or less

1-2 years

2-5 years

5 years old or more

2005

2007

2009

2011

Source: NAEM, March 2011

31

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Carbon Management Software vs. Services Spending


(% share of spending)
100%

As the young carbon management market matures, revenue from carbon management services will increasingly outweigh that from software purchases.

90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%


2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Services

Software
Source: Pike Research, June 2011

32

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Global Reporting Initiative Growth Trend


(No. of reports using GRI guidelines)

1,852

1510

1117

711 516 373 274 122 12 4 44 8 19


2001

139 25
2002

166 25
2003

37
2004

34
2005

45
2006

68
2007

117

139

183

1999

2000

2008

2009

2010

No. of reports

No. of US reports

Source: GRI, "Year in Review 2010" May 2011

33

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

5. Carbon Costs & Markets


Voluntary Carbon Markets Value & Volume FSTE 100 Companies Buying Carbon Offsets Environmental Costs for Global Corporate Economy, 2008 and Projections for 2050 Cost of Carbon and Emission Levels in 2030

34

Voluntary Carbon Markets Value & Volume


(MtCO2e / US$ millions)

The voluntary carbon market shrugged off policy failures and the closure of the Chicago Climate Exchange in 2010 to post a 34% surge in volume to a record 131 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) worth at least $424 million.
Of which Other Exchanges 2 $6.2 $12 2 $6.0 $10 Of which OTC 55 $6.5 $354 128 $6.0 $414 Voluntary Market Total

Market

2009

2010

Volume Ave. Price Value Volume Ave. Price Value (MtCO2e) (US$ million) (US$ million) (MtCO2e) (US$ million) (US$ million)

98

$415

131

$424

Of which CCX

41

$1.2

$50

$0.1

$0

Source: Ecosystem Marketplace, Bloomberg New Energy Finance, June 2011

35

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

FSTE 100 Companies Buying Carbon Offsets


(No. of companies)

Consumer discretionary, 4

Members of the FTSE 100 buy carbon offsets worth 0.1 percent of their carbon emissions. Unilever and Reckitt Benckiser are the carbon offset leaders among the FTSE 100.
Financials, 14 Consumer staples, 3

Not offsetting, 79

Source: FSTE 100, April 2011

36

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Environmental Costs for Global Corporate Economy, 2008 and Projections for 2050
(US$ billions)
20,809

Companies do not normally pay the full costs of environmental damage caused by business activities, so these costs are largely external to financial accounts. Without adequate information about these externalities, markets have failed to accurately account for the dependence of businesses on ecosystem services such as a stable climate and access to water.
External costs, 2008 Projected external costs, 2050

4,530 1,226 GHG emissions

4,702 1,926 546 Pollution 197 635

Water abstraction

General waste

Source: UNEP

37

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Cost of Carbon and Emission Levels in 2030


(US$, cost per tCO2e/ Estimated emissions Gt CO2e)

Carbon price estimates are expected to increase rapidly after 2030. Prices accelerate because of limited technology options and substitution possibilities within the energy sector later, and because cheaper options are exhausted early on. The report looks at four scenario to project carbon prices projection.
63

$110

$110

50

Under the Climate Breakdown scenario, defined as the situation in which climate accords have failed, carbon prices are low, but emissions are high, at 63 gigatons per year. With Stern Action, a scenario in which countries act and enforce emissions limits, the levels are more than halved, at 30 Gt per year, while the costs per tCO2e are nearly ten times higher at $110.
Climate breakdown Stern action $15 30 $15

40

Delayed action

Regional divergence

Cost per tCO2e Emissions, Gt CO2e

Source: Mercer, June 2011

38

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

6. Marketing & Public Opinion


Public Concern Over Environmental Issues Public Perceptions of Global Warming Consumer Intent to Buy Green Products Top 10 Global Green Brands Who Should Police Green Product Claims?

39

Public Concern Over Environmental Issues


(% of US adults)

51% 48% 46% 46% 42% 36% 34% 36% 33% 31% 23% 26% 20% 22% 29% 24% 28% 30% 27% 29% 30% 25% 26% 36% 34% 48%

35%

Pollution of drinking water

Soil/ water contamination

Pollution of rivers, lakes, reservoirs

Supply of fresh water

Air pollution

Extinction of plants, animals

Loss of tropical rain forests

Urban sprawl

Global warming

Great deal

Fair amount

Only a little/not at all

Source: Gallup, March 2011

40

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Public Perceptions of Global Warming


(% of US adults, who evaluated concern)

45
40

41 36 37 35 33 28 29 29 28 26 25 28

40
35 35 30

35
29

34

33

31 34 32 30
28

30 25 20
20 28 27 27 26 22 18
16 12 12 17

29 23
17

30

28 25 26 24 21
19 17 15

29 27 25 20 18
16 17 19

26 24 20

23 15 18
16 12 12

22

23

20

15 10 5 0

19

16

13

1989 May

1990 Apr

1991 Apr

1997 Oct

1999 Mar

1999 Apr

2000 Apr

2001 Mar

2002 Mar

2003 Mar

2004 Mar

2006 Mar

2007 Mar

2008 Mar

2009 Mar

2009 Mar

2010 Mar

2011 Mar

Great deal

Fair amount

Only a little

Not at all

Source: Gallup, March 2011

41

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Consumer Intent to Buy Green Products


(% of US respondents)

53 53 49

Consumers buy the most green products in the grocery, household and personal-care categories. Roughly half of respondents make purchases in these categories, consistent with last years survey. But they are looking more closely at making green purchasing decisions on more expensive items too.

45 37 31 33 24 27 22 16 14 22 15

2010 2011
35

12

12 6 7 8 5 8

Source: ImagePower Green Brand Survey 2011

42

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Top 10 Global Green Brands


(Ranking by survey respondents)
Australia Brazil Natura Cosmeticos O Boticrio Ip Unilever Nestl Petrobras Bombril Johnson & Johnson Avon China France Germany India U.K. The Body Shop Innocent The Cooperative Mark & Spencer IKEA Dove Sainsbury's Waitrose Fairy U.S. Seventh Generation Whole Foods Market Tom's of Maine Burt's Bees Trader Joe's Walt Disney SC Johnson Dove Apple Microsoft, Starbucks (tie)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Subway Toyota ALDI IKEA Woolworth's Apple Dove IGA Kimberly-Clark

Haier Gree Microsoft Mengniu Volkswagen Shangri-La Tsingtao Yili Lenovo

Yves Rocher L'Occitane en Provence Veolia Environnement Belambra Clubs (VVF) IKEA Decathalon Danone NIVEA Suez Environnement Leclerc

Alnatura LichtBlick Frosch (Erdal Rex) Tegut Edeka NORDSEE REWE Dr. Oetket Volkswagen

Amul Dabur Infosys Taj Hotels & Palaces Britannia Suzlon Hindustan Unilever Wipro Maruti Suzuki Godrej Consumer Products

Coles

Hering

Suning

Henkel

Morrisons

Source: ImagePower Green Brand Survey 2011

43

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Who Should Police Green Product Claims?


(% of respondents)

41% 26% 16% 7% 2% 9%


44

A third-party certification system (i.e. Good Housekeeping Seal) The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) The marketing and advertising industry should police itself Other Nobody Dont know

Source: EnviroMedia Social Networking

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

7. Transportation & Supply Chain


2011 Vehicle Models, Fuel Economy Leaders Plug-In Electric Vehicles What Influences their Purchase? Shippers Position on Sustainability Investments Ecological Footprint of Food Production Where are Most Sustainable Packaging Efforts Directed? Global Tropical Production Forests

45

2011 Vehicle Models, Fuel Economy Leaders


(Ranking /MPG, highway, city)
1. Toyota Prius (hybrid) 2. Ford Fusion Hybrid FWD 2. Mercury Milan Hybrid FWD 2. Lincoln MKZ Hybrid FWD

48 36 36 36 41 41 41 40 40 35 24 31 31 35 34 34 39 43 43

51

The top 5 vehicles cleared 40 mpg for highway, while the most fuel efficient car, the Toyota Prius achieved more than 50 mpg on the highway. The tenth ranked Honda CR-Z (manual, hybrid) has a rather modest 31 mpg on the highway, but an impressive 37 mpg in the city, which is second-best for city mpg among 2011 models.

3. Honda Civic Hybrid 3. Honda Insight (hybrid) 4. Honda CR-Z (automatic, hybrid) 5. Lexus HS 250h (hybrid) 6. Ford Escape Hybrid FWD 6. Mazda Tribute Hybrid 2WD 6. Mercury Mariner Hybrid FWD 7. Smart Fortwo (Cabriolet) 7. Smart Fortwo (Coupe) 8. Nissan Altima Hybrid 9. Lexus RX 450h 2WD (hybrid) 10. Honda CR-Z (manual, hybrid)
Highway MPG City MPG

34 31 33 33 33 33 32 31 37

41 41

28

Source: U.S. EPA, May 2011

46

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Plug-In Electric Vehicles What Influences their Purchase?


(% of respondents who indicated "very important")
Charging point available at home

63%

Convenience and concerns over battery range prove to be the most critical factors when motivating consumers to buy a PEV for their next purchase. Only 43 percent cited government subsidies or tax exemptions to compensate for the extra cost of a PEV over a conventional car.

Battery range equal to a full tank of a conventional car

53%

Total costs of buying/operating lower than conventional cars

51%

Option to fast charge, about 20-30 min.

50%

Ability to charge at work or in public parking lots Government subsidy/tax break to cover additional costs of an EV vs. a conventional car

49%

43%

* The term electric vehicle (EV) is defined as plug-in EVs (PEVs), including full EVs and plug-in hybrid EVs (PHEVs). Source: Accenture, May 2011

47

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Shippers Position on Sustainability Investments


(% of respondents)
71%

Many shipping companies are willing to put time and effort into sustainability, even if there is no ROI, while 11% of retail and 3PL
11% 11% 2%
Sustainability must have considerable ROI Sustainability must have an ROI
Retail

44% 33% 32%

43%

13% 9% 6% 8% 4% 6% 6%

shippers want a considerable ROI.

Cost neutral is OK

We will only pay a little for sustainability


3PL (3rd-party logistics)

We will pay for sustainability

Manufacturing

Source: American Shipper, February 2011

48

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Ecological Footprint of Food Production


(1 kg. equivalents)
Water l. footprint Emissions (kg CO2e) Land Use (m2) Grain, kg. (for feed) Calories (Kcal)

Beef

15,500

16.0

7.9

2,470

Chicken

3,900

4.6

6.4

1,650

Eggs

333

5.5

6.7

1,430

Milk

1,000

10.6

9.8

610

Wheat

1,300

0.8

1.5

3,400

Rice

3,400

1,300

Source: OxFam May 2011

49

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Where are Most Sustainable Packaging Efforts Directed?


(% of respondents)
65%

Designing for recyclability, using recycled content and weight reduction, are the top areas of focus for those working specifically on sustainable packaging.

57%

41%

25%

Design for recyclability or use of recycled content

Weight reduction

Renewable or biomass materials

Compostable materials

Source: DuPont, May 2011

50

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Global Tropical Production Forests


(In thousands of hectares)
The estimated size of the natural tropical permanent forest estate (PFE) is 761 million hectares, with 403 million hectares marked as production forest. Between 2005 and 2010,
403,169 352,566

production forests in International Tropical Timber Organization producer countries have increased the area of natural forest under management plans by 34 million hectares to 131 million hectares. The area of certified forest in ITTO producer countries grew from 10.5 million hectares in 2005 to 17 million hectares in 2010.

151,160

165,332 130,732 96,250

10,543 Natural Forest Area Natural Forest Natural Forest Available for harvesting with management plans

17,019

25,168

30,553

44,779 22,371 14,318 9,126

Natural Forest Certified

Natural Forest Sustainably managed

Planted-forest Area

Planted-forest with management plans

2005

2010

Source: ITTO, June 2011

51

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

8. Emissions
World Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Region Federal Governments Total Carbon Footprint Annex I Parties' Emission Reduction Targets from 16th Conference of Parties U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Gas, 2009

52

World Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Region


(Million metric tons CO2e)

14.9 13.3 12.5 10.5 9.7 7.7 6.5 7.7 7.9

7.4 6.3

6.0

5.9

6.3

5.0

2.3

1990

2007

2025

2035

United States

Rest of OECD

China

Rest of Non-OECD

Source: EIA, March 2011

53

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Federal Governments Total Carbon Footprint


(Metric tons of CO2e)

The feds 2010 reducible emissions totaled 66.4 million metric tons of CO2, which is a reduction of GHG pollution by 2.5 million metric tons of CO2 from its 2008 baseline. An additional off-the-books 54.9 million metric tons CO2 emissions stemming from military operations, law enforcement, and other emissions not subject to reduction targets were also reported for 2010. The total carbon footprint is 121.3 million metric tons of CO2 emissions. This is their first emissions report.
Scope 1 and 2 (direct) 495,546 Scope 3 (indirect) 17,228,745 49,193,107 54,360,566

66,421,852

54,856,112

Totals

Reduction-targeted emissions

Non-reduction emissions

Source: The White House Council on Environmental Quality, April 2011

54

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Annex I Parties' Emission Reduction Targets from 16th Conference of Parties


(% of emissions reductions)
2000 1990 2005 1990

Base Year
1990 1990 1990 1992 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 1990 2005

40%

30% 25% 25% 25% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 5% 5% 15%

30% 30% 20% 20% 20% 25%

30%

20% 17% 20%

17%

15% 10% 10%

15%

Source: UNFCCC, March 2011

55

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Gas, 2009


(% of total, Million Metric tons CO2e)

3.3%

2.7% Energy-related carbon dioxide, 5359.6

11.1% High-GWP gases, 87.3 1.3% 81.5% Nitrous oxide, 730.9

Methane, 219.6

Other carbon dioxide, 178.2

Source: EIA, March 2011

56

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

9. Waste & Recycling


Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Recovery, Containers and Packaging, 2009 Plastics Recycling Access by Materials Municipal Solid Waste, Paper and Paperboard, Generated in 2009

57

Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Recovery, Containers and Packaging, 2009
(In millions of tons)
34.94

25.07

12.53 10.08 9.66

1.72

2.23

3.00

2.28

1.51

Paper and paperboard

Plastics

Wood

Glass

Steel

Weight generated

Weight recovered Source: U.S. EPA

58

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Plastics Recycling Access by Materials


(% of US Population)
PET bottles/jugs & jars with caps HDPE bottles/jugs & jars with caps LDPE bottles/jugs & jars with caps PP (polypropylene) bottles/jugs & jars with caps PVC bottles/jugs & jars with caps Other bottles/jugs & jars with caps PET non-bottle rigid (trays/clamshells/cups) HDPE non-bottle rigid (cups/bowls/trays) PVC non-bottle rigid (blisters/clamshells) LDPE non-bottle rigid (tubs/lids) PP non-bottle rigid (cups/bowls/trays) PS non-bottle rigid (cups/bowls/trays) Other non-bottle rigid (cups/bowls/trays) EPS food service EPS packaging (blocks/peanuts) Bulky Plastic (toys/buckets/crates/drums)

92.9% 93.6% 65.5% 65.9% 64.8% 62.7% 53.7% 54.3% 45.6% 47.0% 47.9% 42.9% 43.9% 23.8% 8.8% 17.0% Source: American Chemistry Council / Moore Recycling Associates, May 2011

59

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

Municipal Solid Waste, Paper and Paperboard, Generated in 2009


(in thousands of tons)
27,190

7,760 5,380 4,480 3,490 3,490 1,450 1,310 1,170 960 910 650 650 460

Source: US EPA

60

2011 Environmental Leader LLC. To get daily presentation-ready charts and Excel data tables, join EL PRO.

About Hara
Hara helps organizations grow and profit by optimizing energy and natural resource consumption and minimizing environmental impact. Hara empowers an end-to-end energy and environmental business process from transparency to results to help organizations improve operational efficiency, maximize value and manage risk. Hara customers include: Aerojet, Hasbro, Intuit, News Corporation, Safeway, U.S. Bank, and City of Las Vegas and City of Philadelphia. For more information, please visit www.hara.com.

About Environmental Leader


Since 2006, Environmental Leader (www.environmentalleader.com) has been the definitive and objective b2b voice reporting on business-related energy, environmental and sustainability issues. Environmental Leader, with its 10,000- plus news stories, columns, videos, reports, white papers, webinars and industry-leading daily newsletter, has become the go-to source for corporate environmental, sustainability and energy executives, the one site executives must visit every day in order to keep informed and make tough choices on environmental and energy issues.

About EL PRO
EL PRO provides daily, unrivaled insights into environmental, energy, and sustainability issues, inspiring innovation within your company and providing the information needed to take decisive action. The subscription provides daily must-read news, data and research providing unprecedented value for enterprise environmental and sustainability teams. Environmental Leader's PRO service is now available at the introductory price of only $947 per year. Department-wide and enterprise-wide subscriptions are also available. To find out more, receive samples, and discuss the benefits EL PRO can provide your company, please contact us at 970.235.1096 or elpro@environmentalleader.com. Subscribe now and receive instant access to thousands of dollars worth of research, data, and analysis. New research, analysis, and data is added daily. You can subscribe and get more information at www.environmentalleader.com/pro.
Features of EL PRO EL Insights - 2x per month research reports covering emerging energy, environmental and sustainability technologies. EL Data - Daily presentation-ready graphs and spreadsheets on energy, environmental and sustainability data. EL Briefings - Daily policy and regulatory, standards and certifications, and enforcement briefings. EL Trends - Monthly newsletter focusing on the most important news of the previous 30 days - and the implications for your business. Baseline - Latest news on corporate environmental, sustainability and energy initiatives and goals.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi