REPORT ON THE ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF PILE AND PILE CAP FOR

HANGAR & ANNEXE BUILDING - ANDAMAN

Owner:
AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
Client:
ECLAT DESIGNS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD.

Consulting Engineers:
vc Ocean Engineering & Consultancy Private Limited
Submission: 10.05.2011
Final Report

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................3
2. GEOMETRY...............................................................................................................................4
2.1. Steel portion.........................................................................................................................4
2.2. Concrete portion...................................................................................................................4
3. MATERIAL ................................................................................................................................4
3.1. PEB Portion:.........................................................................................................................4
3.2. Concrete portion:..................................................................................................................4
4. LOADINGS ................................................................................................................................5
4.1. Wind Load............................................................................................................................5
5. LOAD COMBINATIONS.............................................................................................................5
6. ANALYSIS..................................................................................................................................6
7. RESULTS...................................................................................................................................6
8. DESIGN OF MEMBERS.............................................................................................................7
8.1. Design of Pile:......................................................................................................................7
8.2. Design of Pile cap:................................................................................................................9
8.3. Design of pedestal:.............................................................................................................10

1.

INTRODUCTION
It has been proposed for the Construction of Hangar and annex building at Andaman,
ECLAT has awarded the Detailed Analysis and Design work of the hanger annex
Building to OECPL, Chennai. This report deals with the analysis and design of pile
and pile cap of the hanger and annexe building at Andaman.

2.
2.1.

GEOMETRY
Steel portion
The length of the building is 30 m (c/c) and breadth of the building is 45 m (inner
dimension). This is a steel Hanger building with reinforced concrete pedestals. The
height up to the eaves level is 7.182 m. The spacing of columns is 7.50 m c/c.

2.2.

Concrete portion
The length of the building is 30 m (c/c) and breadth of the building is 6 m (c/c
dimension). The spacing of columns is 7.50 m c/c. The pedestal rests on pile cap. The
entire system rests on pile foundations.

3.
3.1.

MATERIAL
PEB Portion:
Grade of Steel,

3.2.

For Main Members

Fy- 340

For Secondary Members

Fy-250

Concrete portion:
Grade of Concrete

M30

Grade of steel

Fe-415

4.

LOADINGS
The following loads are taken into account as per IS: 875 part I and part II.

4.1.

Live load on roofing

0.75 kN/m2

Unit weight of steel

78.5 kN/m3

Unit weight of roofing

0.05 kN/m2

Unit weight of concrete

25 kN/m3

Unit weight of brick

20 kN/m3

Wind Load
Wind load corresponding to basis wind speed of 44 m/s is considered as per IS : 875 Part III

Wind load calculation:

Basic wind speed

44 m/s

Risk coefficient (k1)

Topography factor (k3)

Terrain height and structure size factor (k2)

(Category 3, class c)
height
0 - 10
Design wind speed (Vz)

= Vb x k1 x k2 x k3
height
0 - 10

Design wind pressure (Pz)

factor
1.03

Vz
45.53

= 0.6 x Vz2.
height
0 - 10

Pz (kN/m2)
1.24

Wind pressure coefficients corresponding to a roof slope of 3 degrees is considered.

5.

Load Combinations
1.

Dead load + Live load

6.

2.

Dead load + Live load wind load

3.

Dead load Wind load

4.

Dead load + Live load seismic load

5.

Dead load Seismic load

ANALYSIS
A detailed analysis of the building is done using finite element package program SAP
2000. The loads considered in the analysis are dead load, live load as per IS: 875 Part I
and II and wind load as per IS: 875 Part III. Seismic analysis is done as per IS: 19832002. In the analysis, the beams and columns are modelled as frame elements. The
steel columns are assumed to be hinged at the top of the pedestals. The reactions from
the steel columns and pedestal are transferred to the pile cap as corresponding
loadings.

7.

RESULTS
From the analysis the bending moment acting on pile caps, axial force and bending
moment acting on piles are obtained and the members are designed for the appropriate
forces.

8.
8.1.

DESIGN OF MEMBERS
Design of Pile:
Design of a typical Pile P1 is illustrated below:
Combination 1.5(DL-EQX) governs the design.
From the analysis:
Pu

160 kN

Mux

263 kNm.

Muy

27 kNm.

Grade of concrete

M 30

Grade of steel

Fe 415

Size of the pile

600 mm

Equivalent fixity length of pile

8 x diameter of the pile

4.8 m

2 l,

lex

9.6 m

(lex/D)

9600 / 600

16 >12

Assuming leff

Therefore the pile is treated as long column.

Ma

(XX direction)

(PuD/2000) (lex/D) 2

12.30 kNm.

Total Moment =

Mx + Max

263+12.3

275.3 kNm.

Total Moment =

My + May

(YY direction)

27+12.3

39.3 kNm.

L0/500 + D/30 =
Ma1

0.0296

160 x 0.0296

4.74 kNm.
< 27 kNm.

Therefore design for,

Pu = 160 kN,

Mux

275.3 kNm,

Muy

39.3 kNm

(Mux2 + Muy2)

(275.32 + 39.32)

Mu

278.0 kNm

(Pu / fck D2)

0.015

(Mu / fck D3)

0.043

(d / D)

87.5 / 600

0.15

0.04

Asc required

4320 mm2.

Minimum reinforcement

0.8% of cross sectional area of the pile

(0.8 / 100) x x 6002 / 4

2262 mm2

Resultant moment

Referring to Chart 57 SP 16
(pt / fck )

Area provided 10-Y25 (4910 mm2)

8.2.

Design of Pile cap:

A typical design of Pile cap PC2 is illustrated below.
Design for positive moment:
Size of the Pile

600 mm

Grade of concrete

M 30

Grade of steel

Fe-415

Assuming clear cover as 75 mm and also assuming 20 mm diameter bars are used
b
D
d
Mu

600 + 150 + 150

900 mm

1000 mm

1000-75-10

915mm.

580 kNm.

Mu/bd =

0.7

pt

0.2

Ast

1830 mm2.

0.85 x b x d / fy

0.85 x 900 x 915 / 415

1682 mm2.

0.35 % Therefore o.k.

Referring Table-4, SP-16

Since, Ast min

(IS 456:2000, Clause 26.5.1.1)

Provide 10-Y20(3130 mm2)

pt Provided

Design for shear force:

Maximum shear force in the beam

248 kN (factored)

Vu

248 kN.

0.396

V/bd

0.27 < 0.396

Hence no shear reinforcement is required.

8.3.

Design of pedestal:
From the analysis the maximum forces that are transferred to the pedestal are
calculated and the pedestals are designed for the appropriate forces.
A typical design of Pedestal P1 is shown below:
Combination DL - W0 governs the design,
Maximum axial force

256 kN (C)

Maximum lateral force

170 kN

Length of column

0.25 m

Mx

42.5 kNm

256 kN

Therefore the pedestal is designed for factored moments,

Pu

384 kN

Mux

64 kNm

450 750 mm

Grade of concrete

M 30

Grade of steel

Fe-415

0.04

Size of pedestal

Pu / fck b D
Mu / fck b D2

0.01

(Chart-44 SP-16)

10

p / fck

0.01

0.01 30

Minimum p

0.8%

Ast required

2700 mm2

Ast provided

6-Y25+4-Y20+4-Y16 (5002 mm2)

=0.3%

11