Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Debates within the Constituent Assembly After Jinnahs death, the crucial issue to be decided was whether the Governor-General should be the constitutional head of state with the Prime Minster and his Cabinet exercising real executive power or otherwise. At that time, Liaquat wielded real power. He chose to remain prime minister which meant that the Cabinet form of government was to become effective. Khawaja Nazimuddin, who became the second Governor-General, appeared to be willing to assume the customary privileges of the office without Jinnahs real power. This harmony continued until the death of Liaquat on 16 October, 1951. Immediately following Jinnahs death, there developed a fierce competition for influence, wealth, power and prestige between the various political interests and personalities.
Basic Principles Committee and its Interm Report-1950 After the passing of the Objectives Resolution in 1949, the Constituent Assembly set up a number of committees and sub-committees to work out the details of the Constitution on the principles as laid down in the Objectives Resolution. Sub-committee on federal and provincial constitutions and distribution of powers. Sub-Committee on franchise; and Sub-Committee for judiciary.
Download from http://saqibtanveer.blogspot.com
Basic Principles Committee and its Interm Report-1950 After the passing of the Objective Resolution in 1949, the Constituent Assembly set up a number of committees and sub-committees to work out the details of the Constitution on the principles as laid down in the Objectives Resolution.
1. Sub-committee on federal and provincial constitutions and distribution of powers. Sub-Committee on franchise; Sub-Committee for judiciary.
2. 3.
Evaluation of Report-1950
The reaction to the first draft Constitution was most unfavourable in East Pakistan. The Quantum of representation in the proposed central legislature was the main point of criticism. All the units were given an the same number of seats in the upper houses.
East Pakistanis also did not favour the idea of Urdu being the only state language.
Download from http://saqibtanveer.blogspot.com
Report of the Committee -1950 on Fundamental Rights and Matters Relating to Minorities. The committee on the fundamental rights of citizens submitted its report before the Constituent Assembly which was accepted in 1950.
Constitution-makers guaranteed certain fundamental rights to the citizens- Both Muslims and non-Muslims in Pakistan. The fundamental rights included the following important provisions: equality of all citizens before the law; equal protection of law to all citizens; no discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth with regard to access to replaces of public entertainment, recreation, welfare, or utility. Every qualified citizen would be eligible for induction in the services of the state irrespective of religion, race, caste, sex, descent or place of birth.
Download from http://saqibtanveer.blogspot.com
1.The Objectives Resolution was adopted as a Preamble to the proposed Constitution. 2.The head of the state was required to be a Muslim and to be elected for a term of five years at a joint sitting of both the houses of the federal legislature. The head of state could not hold office consecutively for more than two full terms. 3.The Prime Minister was to be appointed by the head of the state. The Council of Muslims was to be collectively responsible to the House of the People only. 4.The House of Units was to consist of 120 members. The house of the people was to consist of 400 members, of whom 200 were to be directly elected from East Bengal, and 200 from West Pakistan.
10.The authority to dissolve the House of the People was vested in the head of the state, normally to be exercised on the advice of the council of ministers.
The reaction in the Punjab was extremely unfavourable. Critics saw no logic in treating a single unit, East Bengal, of equal importance with all other units put together and regarded it as a violation of the federal principle under which all the units, large or small, should get equal representation in the Upper House, as is the case in the United States and some other federations.
The critics seemed to overlook the fact that East Pakistan had a larger population than the total of nine units of West Pakistan put together. The composition and lesser powers of the Upper House were also attacked. The Punjab leaders demanded representation in the Lower House to be on the basis of population and in the Upper House to be on the basis of equality of the units, and for the two houses to have equal powers. The opposition to the second report in the Punjab forced the Constituent Assembly to postpone its deliberations for an indefinite period.
The lack of a constitutional provision in case the two Houses were unable to resolve a conflict in Joint session.
Download from http://saqibtanveer.blogspot.com
Anti-Ahmediya Movement
, Martial Law, and Dismissal of Nazimuddins Government The Punjab soon faced serious food shortages, partly created by landlords who had turned hostile due to the modest reforms made by the Daultana government in favour of agricultural tenants. The Ahmedis (whom their opponents also refer to as Mirzais or Qadianis) were a close-knit community. The anti-Ahmediya agitation and food shortages caused serious difficulties for Nazimuddin government. In early March, 1953. Nazimuddin considered appealing to the British Government to recall the Governor-General. He could allege with justification that Ghulam Muhammad was physically incapacitated. Nazimuddin still enjoyed the confidence of the Constituent Assembly and could defeat his opposition in the Assembly. On 17 April 1953 he was summoned by Ghulam Muhammad. He tried appealing to Buckingham Palace only to discover that overseas telegraphic service had been deliberately put out of operation.
The leading party had been treated as a pure question of law and order, without any political considerations and District Magistrate and one Superintendent of Police could have dealt with them.
On the dismissal of Nazimuddins government, Muhammad Ali Bogra was appointed Prime Minister who regarded it as one of his principal tasks to overcome the constitutional deadlock.
October 7 1953 and adopted by it on 6 October 1954. The Muhammad Ali Formula was as follows: The federal legislature should be composed of two Houses-the House of Units and the House of the People. The total strength of the House of Units would be fifty, to be equally divided among the five units. The House of Units would be elected indirectly by the legislatures of the units, and where there was no legislature, the system of election was to be determined by an act of the federal legislature. Equal powers were to be extended to both Houses. Houses for the election of the head of the state and for disposal of votes of confidence. In case of a difference of opinion between the two Houses, a joint session of the two Houses would be called and the measure might then be passed by a majority vote. If the difference could not be solved, the formula originally provided that the head of the state could dissolve the legislature but this clause was amended when the formula was adopted by the Constituent Assembly.
The distribution of seats in the Upper House was made in accordance with the geographical facts of the country. As West Pakistan had the major part of the countrys territory, it was given a clear majority in the House of Units.
The distribution of seats in the two Houses was made in such a way as to ensure parity between East and West Pakistan. An analysis of the problem of representation which was faced by constitution makers in Pakistan reveals the feelings of mutual distrust, fear and suspicion between the people of East and West Pakistan. The Muslims of undivided Pakistan were united in a unique way under the leadership of Muhammad Ali Jinnah and fought for Pakistan without any sense of distinction as Bengalis, Punjabis, Sindhis, and so on. But soon after the establishment of Pakistan, provincial and regional feelings began to manifest themselves. East Pakistan felt that they did not have a fair and adequate share in the central government and administration. They felt that they had been neglected and were dominated by the West wing. This gave birth to the feelings of regionalism in East Pakistan. As a consequence, political issues often came to be judged on the basis of provincial interests. National unity and national feelings were considerably damaged and therein lay the root cause of the difficulty in finding a basis for representation in the legislature under the future Constitution. Each unit feared the domination of the other and consequently, the framers of the Constitution had to evolve the formula of a government based on regional parity. The difficulties involved in such an arrangement were regarded as a painful necessity.
Demand for maximum autonomy came first from the largest unit, namely East Pakistan.
They feared an increase in the power of the centre would mean a corresponding decrease in their power and influence. Demand that only three subjects namely, defence, foreign affairs, and currency, should be given to the centre and then rest should be vested in the provinces.
Download from http://saqibtanveer.blogspot.com
Neither of these two methods was acceptable in Pakistan. A third course was adopted, devised by the British experts when they distributed powers in the federal constitution for undivided Pakistan under the Government of Pakistan Act 1935.
In the final draft of 1954, they followed the method of preparing three lists of subjects, federal provincial and concurrent. The central government was given wide powers to manage defence, foreign affairs, currency and banking, communications.
Residuary power, following the model of the 1935 Act, was vested in the head of the state who, in consultation with the provincial governments, might direct any specified subjects not mentioned in any of the lists to be classified as being a part of either.
The third issue in the controversy between East and West Pakistan was that of language. Pakistan is a multilingual state.
The controversy was whether Pakistan should have a single state language. Urdu or two state languages, Urdu and Bengali. Presented the following formula which was accepted by the Constituent Assembly:
The offjicial language of Pakistan should be Urdu and Bengali and such other language as might be declared by the Head of the state on the recommendation of the provincial legislatures concerned; Members of Parliament should have the right to speak in Urdu and Bengali in addition to English;
Notwithstanding anything in the above Article, for a period of twenty years from the commencement of the Constitution, the English language should continue to be used for all official purposes of the Republic for which it was being used immediately before such commencement;
For examination of the central services, all provincial languages should be placed on an equal footing;
The state should take all measures for the development and growth of a common national language. Provision be made to teach Arabic Urdu and Bengali.
From the theoretical point of view, a multi-lingual state is not desirable as it raises many problems. No doubt, the adoption of one state language, if it were possible, would have been preferable from the standpoint of national unity, but it would have been unrealistic and unwise to ignore the demand of the people of East Bengal. The East Pakistanis insisted on Bengali as one of the state languages and to impose uniformity of language detrimental to the national unity for which Jinnah had wanted on state language. The adoption of Bengali would have lead to stronger ties and better understanding between the peoples of the two wings. The multi-lingual solution, it would seem, was a pragmatic approach in the existing circumstances.
With the constitutional issues at last settled and the drafting entrusted to experts working under a deadline of 1 January 1955, the Constituent Assembly was adjourned sine die. The GovernorGeneral (Ghulam Muhammad), stung by the Assemblys action in curtailing his powers, struck back. On 24 October 1954, he dissolved the Constituent Assembly and announced an end to what he described as parliamentary bickering. He issued the following proclamation: The Governor-General having considered the political crisis with which the country is faced, has with deep regret come to the conclusion that the constitutional machinery has broken down. He therefore has decided to declare a state of emergency throughout Pakistan. The Constituent Assembly as at present constituted has lost the confidence of the people and can no longer function. The ultimate authority vests in the people who will decide all issues including constitutional issues through their representatives to be elected afresh. Elections will be held as early as possible. Until such time as elections are held, the administration of the country will be carried on by a reconstituted Cabinet. He has called upon the Prime Minister to reform the Cabinet with a view to giving the country a vigorous and stable administration. The invitation has been accepted. The security and stability of the country are of paramount importance. All personal, sectional and provincial interests must be subordinated to the supreme national interest.