1.

Make a dot plot for number of defects per 100 vehicles for
the se randomly
chosen 12 brands

BRAN
D
LEXUS
CADILL
AC
BUICK
HYUND
AI
ACURA
CHRYL
SER
SUBAR
U
FORD
SAAB
LAND R
SUZUKI
VOLKS
W

DEFE
CTS
87
93
100
102
117
120
123
130
133
148
149
164

Descriptive statistics

count
mean
sample variance
sample standard deviation

DEF
ECT
S
12
122.
17
575.
79
24.0

minimum
maximum
range
1st quartile
median
3rd quartile
interquartile range
mode
skewness
kurtosis
coefficient of variation (CV)

0
87
164
77
101.
50
121.
50
136.
75
35.2
5
#N/A

Frequency Distribution - Quantitative

DEFECTS
lower

80
85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160

upper

<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<

85
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
135
140
145
150
155
160
165

midpoi
nt
83
88
93
98
103
108
113
118
123
128
133
138
143
148
153
158
162

widt
h
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

frequen
cy
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
1
12

percent
0.0
8.3
8.3
0.0
16.7
0.0
0.0
8.3
16.7
0.0
16.7
0.0
0.0
16.7
0.0
0.0
8.3

cumulative
frequen percen
cy
t
0
0.0
1
8.3
2
16.7
2
16.7
4
33.3
4
33.3
4
33.3
5
41.7
7
58.3
7
58.3
9
75.0
9
75.0
9
75.0
11
91.7
11
91.7
11
91.7
12
100.0

100.0

Looking at the appearances we can conclude that the data is right skewed i.e
positively skewed. SKEWENESS COEFFICIENT = .19
The outliers do not affect the data set influentially.

2. Info presented is about the years and the margin of victory

on that particular year for the game of ROSEBOWL.Do
analysis about data.

YEAR
1917

MAR
GIN
49

1918

14

1919

14

1920

1921

28

1922

1923

11

1924

1925

17

1926

1927

1928

1929

1930

33

1931

24

1932

1933

35

1934

1935
1936

16
7

1
954
195
5
195
6
195
7
195
8
195
9
196
0
196
1
196
2
196
3
196
4
196
5
196
6
196
7
196
8
196
9
197
0
197
1
197
2
197
3
197

8
1
3
3
1
6
3
2
6
3
6
1
0
1
8
5
1
0
2
7
2
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
0
1
2
5
2

1937

21

1938

13

1939

1940

14

1941

1942

1943

1944

29

1945

25

1946

20

1947

31

1948

49

1949

1950

1951

4
197
5
197
6
197
7
197
8
197
9
198
0
198
1
198
2
198
3
198
4
198
5

1
1
1
3
8
7
7
1
1
7
2
8
1
0
3
6
3

1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003

17
7
3
8
7
12
20
7
5
18
9
3
5
7
8
10
23
20

Descriptive statistics

count
mean
sample variance
sample standard
deviation
minimum
maximum
range
skewness
kurtosis
coefficient of
variation (CV)
1st quartile
median
3rd quartile
interquartile range
mode

MARGI
N
87
13.06
123.61
11.12
0
49
49
1.20
1.16
85.15%
5.00
10.00
19.00
14.00
7.00

low extremes
low outliers
high outliers
high extremes

Frequency Distribution Quantitative

0
0
2
0

MARGIN
lower

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45

upper

<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50

midpoi
nt
3
8
13
18
23
28
33
38
43
47

widt
h
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

frequen
cy
20
23
15
7
7
7
3
3
0
2

percent
23.0
26.4
17.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
3.4
3.4
0.0
2.3

cumulative
frequen percen
cy
t
20
23.0
43
49.4
58
66.7
65
74.7
72
82.8
79
90.8
82
94.3
85
97.7
85
97.7
87
100.0

Looking at the histogram we can infer that the data is RIGHTLY

SKEWED i.e Positively skewed.Also ,the data figures i.e
mean>median>mode(13,10,7) shows that data is positively
skewed.
SKEWENESS COEFFICIENT =1.2

Frequency Distribution Quantitative

MARGIN
lower

upper

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45

<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50

midpoi
nt
3
8
13
18
23
28
33
38
43
47

widt
h
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

frequen
cy
20
23
15
7
7
7
3
3
0
2

midpoi
nt
3
8
13
18
23
28
33
38
43
47

widt
h
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

frequen
cy
20
23
15
7
7
7
3
3
0
2

percent
23.0
26.4
17.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
3.4
3.4
0.0
2.3

cumulative
frequen percen
cy
t
20
23.0
43
49.4
58
66.7
65
74.7
72
82.8
79
90.8
82
94.3
85
97.7
85
97.7
87
100.0

percent
23.0
26.4
17.2
8.0
8.0
8.0
3.4
3.4
0.0
2.3

cumulative
frequen percen
cy
t
20
23.0
43
49.4
58
66.7
65
74.7
72
82.8
79
90.8
82
94.3
85
97.7
85
97.7
87
100.0

Frequency Distribution Quantitative

MARGIN
lower

0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45

upper

<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<

5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50