Ic Format 3

OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
PRODUCT QUALITY PLANNING TIMING PLAN CUM PROGRESS REVIEW MEETING
DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-003/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01
Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer S.No. 1.

1.1 1.2 1.3
EVALUATION OF DRAWINGS & ENGG PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION FOR MANUFACTURABILITY Part Number : Vehicle / Model: Yes No Comments / Action Required
DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-004/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01
: :
Check Point
Responsibility
Due Date
Engineering Drawing
Have Dimensions that affect Fit / Function and durability been identified? Are reference dimensions identified to minimize inspection layout time? Are sufficient control points and datum surfaces identified to design functional gauges? Are tolerances compatible with accepted manufacturing standards? Are there any such requirements specified that cannot be evaluated using known inspection techniques?
1.4 1.5
2.
2.1 2.2
Engineering Performance Specification

Have all the Special Characteristics been identified? Have similar parts manufactured at minimum and maximum specification been tested? Will all products be tested in-house? If not, is it done by an approved sub-contractor? Is the specified test sampling size and / or frequency feasible? If required, has customer approval been obtained for test equipment?
2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6
(SIGNATURE)
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer S. No. 1. 2. : :

Check Point
CHECK LIST FOR MATERIAL SPECIFICATION Part Number : Vehicle / Model: Yes No
Comments / Action Required
Responsib ility
Due Date
Are Special Characteristics for materials been identified? Are specified materials, heat treat and surface treatments compatible with the product durability requirements? (For
Design Companies only)
3 4
5.
a) b) c) 6 7 8. a) b) c) d)
Are the intended materials suppliers on the customer approved list? Will materials suppliers be required to provide Test Certificate with each shipment? Have the materials characteristics requiring inspection been identified? If so: Will Characteristics be checked in-house? Is Test Equipment available? Will training be required to assure accurate result? Will Out-side Laboratories be used for the purpose? Are all Laboratories used accredited (if required)? Have the following materials requirements been considered? Handling Storage Environment during storage Identification during storage (SIGNATURE)
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
TEAM FEASIBILITY COMMITMENT
Date : ..// Part Name : Customer : Feasibility Considerations:

S. No. 1 Considerations Yes No CFT Comments * Resp. T. Date Is product adequately defined (Application requirements etc.) to enable feasibility review? 2 Can Engineering Specification be met as written? 3 Can product be manufactured to tolerances specified on drawing? 4 Is there adequate capacity to make the product? 5 Does the design allow the use of efficient materials handling techniques? 6 Can the product be manufactured without incurring any unusual : a) Cost for Capital Equipment? b) Cost for Tooling? C) Alternative Manufacturing Methods?
Part Number Vehicle / Model
: :
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
TEAM FEASIBILITY COMMITMENT
S. No. 7.
Considerations
Yes
No
CFT Comments *
Resp.
T. Date
Is Statistical Process Control required on product? 8 Is Statistical Process Control presently used on similar products? a) Are the processes in control and stable? b) Are Cpks greater than 1.33? 9 Can Product be manufactured with Cpks that meet requirements? Is there any Problem Observed in past during development of the similar Product.
10
CONCLUSION : PL. TICK ( ) Feasible [ ] Not Feasible [ ] CFT COMMENTS
* Note: Every Yes comment should be supported with the evidence and every No comment should be supported with the action plan in case product declared as feasible. HOD Design & Development HOD Marketing HOD Manufacturing HOD Purchase HOD Quality Assurance HOD PPC
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part name: Customer: S. No. Part name
BILL OF MATERIAL
Part No. Stage Preliminary Part No. Qty. Raw material Specifications [ ] Final [ Source Size Rev & date
Vehicle/ Model ] Weight Gross Net Remarks
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
COSTING SHEET
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer S. No. 1 : :
PRODUCT / PROCESS QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW
Part Number : Vehicle / Model: Required Yes / No If Yes, Action Reqd Resp Remarks
Expected Modifications Any Change in Documentation : - Manual - Procedures - Work Instruction - Control Plan - Inspection Std. - Process Control Sheet Changes in the Materials Storage Systems Change in the Inventory Norms Change in the Material Handling Systems Any Training required for new instruments being taken Any Modification in the existing processes Additional SPC tools to be used Mistake Proofing required, if any Change in Plant Layout Any Change in the Purchasing System New Vendors to be developed Modifications in the Internal Audit Schedule Any other not referred above:
2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer

Preliminary
LISTING OF SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS

Part Number : Vehicle / Model:
: :
Final S. No. Description of Special Characteristics Process Product Specification & Tolerances Reason for Spl Characteristics
(Refer Notes below)
Classification
Note : Reason for Special Characteristics are Given below: Safety Requirements/ Govt. Regulator Fit / Function Other than Above = Critical = Major * = Minor *
* - Appearance will be considered Major for Metal Finished Components Specify/ Use customer defined symbols for special characteristics ( If any) These special characteristics must be taken care while formulating PFMEAs & Control Plans. (Signature)
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
Product : Customer :
IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIORNMENT/SAFETY/HEALTH RELATED ISSUES FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Model :
S.No. Safety Related Check Points 1. Product Safety 1.1 Is product prone to Fire? 1.2 1.3 1.3.1 2. 2.1 2.2 2.3 Are Safe storage from Fire and Pilferage available? Does customer declare Product as Safety Critical? If above is YES, which parameters are Safety Critical? Process Safety As per Process Flow Diagram, which are the stages where there is probability of accidents / fire? Accidents data (Major / Minor) . Which Processes can be un-safe (as per flow diagram), if not controlled? State such Process Parameters which make the process un-safe? Personnel Safety Are there possibilities of eliminating Potential Safety Hazards? If answer at 3.1 is No and the process can be un-safe, what type of PPEs need to be provided? Is there any need to revise the Current Status EMS & OHS Analysis Review. Is there any Applicable Legal Issue regarding Product, Process requiring consideration for action?
Observations Yes / No
Actions Required
Yes / No
2.4 3. 3.1 3.2
Yes / No
4.0 5.0
Yes / No Yes / No
Note: Consider the above while carrying out Employee Safety Risk Assessment
(Signature) CFT Leader
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer SR. No. : :
SPC STUDY PLAN / STUDY RESULTS (Cp & CpK / Pp & PpK)
Part Number : Vehicle / Model: Reason for Identifying Stage & M/C (Operation) Cp & CpK or Pp & PpK Target Specified by Customer Results of SPC Study Action, if any
Product Special Characteristics (In-house or Specified by Customer)
Note : a) Refer FMEA/Control Plan and ensure that for all Special Characteristics, Ppk must be identified. b)Ppk / Cpk is applicable only for such operations which are stable. c)For unstable processes, 100 % inspection is carried out.
(Signature)
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Part Name Customer

SR NO.
PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE OF THE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAM Part Number :
: :
Vehicle / Model:
RESP. T. DATE REMARK
PROBLEM OBSERVED DURING ACTION TAKEN TO PROACTIVE ACTION TO BE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ELIMINATE THE PROBLEM. TAKEN FOR THE PRODUCT TO SIMILAR PRODUCT IN PAST BE DEVELOPED PART NAME :
(HEAD-PE / CFT LEADER )
OMAX AUTOS LTD

(LOCATION)
INITIAL PRODUCTION PART TAG

MRR. NO./DATE ECN NO./DATE QUANTITY DATE

REASON FOR IPP (Please tick)
PART NO. PART NAME VENDOR MODEL DETAIL OF MODIFICATION
DESIG CHANG N E NEW SAMPLE MATERIAL CHANG E MANUFACTURINGMETHOD CHANG E MANUFACTURINGPROCERSS ORDER CHANG E MACHINE CHANGE JIG / TOOL CHANGE DIE / MOULD CHANGE INSPECTION METHOD CHANGE WORKER CHANGE TRANSPORTATION METHOD / TYPE OF PACKING CHANGE DEPTT.
REM ARKS, IF A NY
PREP. & REVIEWED BY CHECK POINTS DURING MANUFACTURING / FITMENT :

SEQ. NO. DEPARTM ENT DESCRIPTION
1 2 3 4 5 COMMENTS OF QA DEPTT. :
We affirm that the sample represented are representative of our parts and have been made to the applicable drawings and specifications and are made from specified materials on regular production tooling with no operation other than the regular production process.
TH SE R SU E E LTS M E ALL D AWIN & SP C ATION R QU E E TS. ET R G E IFIC E IR M N
TH SE R SU E E LTS D N O OTM E D AWIN & SP C ATION R QUIR M N ET R G E IFIC E E E TS.
ROUTING :
INITIATOR DEPTT. QA DEPTT. ENGINEERING DISPA TCH (IF REQUIRED)
(DETAILS OVERLEAF)
APPROVED BY :
HOD (QA)
CUSTOM ER
COMMETS / FEEDBACK FROM CUSTOMER
AP R P OVE D
R JE TE E C D
OTH R E S
..
CUST. REP. SIGN & DATE
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Customer Name
PRODUCT HANDOVER REPORT / PRODUCT QUALITY SUMMARY & SIGN OFF
Part Name
Part Number
Date
Sr. No. A. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Requirements To Be Fulfilled
Comment by Development
Comment by PPC& Concerned Mfg. Section
Comment by QA Dept.
Target Date In Case Req. Not Completed.
13 B
Documents Required Process Flow Diagram Layout Plan Process Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Control Plan Bill of Material Operation Standards Final Inspection Standards Incoming Quality Standards BOP & Raw Material Results meeting the Specifications Process Capability Report for Special Characteristics Packaging Standard with Customer Approval Report Customer PAP Approval Report (Conditional/Unconditional), If Conditional what is the Action Plan. Reference Sample (If Required) List of Tooling/Jig & Fixtures & Status
List of Gauges/Instruments & Status
List of Machines & Utilities Required
Any Other Resource Required
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR Customer Name
Part Name
Part Number
Date
Sr. No. A. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Requirements To Be Fulfilled
Comment by Development
Comment by PPC& Concerned Mfg. Section
Comment by QA Dept.
Target Date In Case Req. Not Completed.
13 B
Documents Required Process Flow Diagram Layout Plan Process Failure Mode & Effect Analysis Control Plan Bill of Material Operation Standards Final Inspection Standards Incoming Quality Standards BOP & Raw Material Results meeting the Specifications Process Capability Report for Special Characteristics Packaging Standard with Customer Approval Report Customer PAP Approval Report (Conditional/Unconditional), If Conditional what is the Action Plan. Reference Sample (If Required) List of Tooling/Jig & Fixtures & Status
List of Gauges/Instruments & Status
List of Machines & Utilities Required
Any Other Resource Required
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-016/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 02 of 02
PRODUCTION WORTHINESS STATUS

Operation Sequence Operation Name Cycle Time As per Costing At the Time of Sheet Handover
TOTAL CYCLE TIME PRODUCTION / SHIFT TOTAL NO. OF OPERATIONS PROCESS REJECTION PPM STATUS
FINAL ACCEPTANCE STATUS

HODS Product Engg Q.A PPC MFG.
SIGNATURE
(IF ACCEPTABLE)
COMMENT IN CASE IT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE
CC :
G.M.-Operation
G.M.-Marketing
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
PART SUBMISSION WARRANT
Safety and/or Government Regulation : Yes [ ] No [ ] Part Name: Part No.: Rev: Model : Weight: Customer: Submission Date:/./. Qty:
Submission Level : 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ] 4 [ ] 5 [ ] Supplier Name: Category: Initial Sample [ ] Pilot Lot [ ] Initial Sample Cum Pilot Lot [ ] Submission No: : 1 [ ] 2 [ ] 3 [ ]
Reason For Submission Initial Sample [ ]Design Change [ ]Tooling Change [ ]Raw material Change [ Process Change [ ] Raw Material Source Change [ ] Tooling Location Change [ ] Engineering Change[ ] Tooling Inactive for more than one year [ ] Correction of Discrepancy [ ] Other- Please Specify [ ] Customer Requirements (Put Mark wherever appropriate ) S. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Description Part Submission Warrant Dimensional Report Material Test report Functional Test report Drawings Process Flow Diagram Control Plan Process FMEA Process capability study report for Major/Critical Dimensions ( Cp, Cpk) Gauge Study Appearance / Visual Inspection report One no. sample retention till part is active Pilot Lot identification on Invoice/Boxes as Pilot Lot Requirement With Sample With Pilot Lot Check Sheet By Supplier By Customer ]
Submission Result These Results meet all drawing specification and standard requirements Yes [ ] No [ ] If No Explanation : Checked By Declaration I hereby affirm that the samples represented by this certification are representative of our parts, have been made to the been made to the applicable customer drawings and specification , and are made from the specified material on regular production tooling with no operation other than the regular production process . I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review. For Customer Use Only ( If Applicable) Part Warrant Disposition: Approved [ ] Rejected [ ] Interim Approval [ ] Authorized Signatory Name: Designation: Customer Name: Signature: Date:
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
Part Name:Part No.:Customer:Veh./Model :S. No . Instrument Used
CHECKING AID LIST
Spec. With Tolerance
Description
Status
Resp.
Remarks
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
DOCUMENT ISSUE SLIP
DEPARTMENT: S. No. Document Type Document Description Doc. No. Qty.
DATE:. Reason Signature
REQUESTED BY:
HOD:.
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
CHANGE REQUEST
Originating Department:.
Date: ]
Change Type: Document Amendment [ ] Drawing/ Specification Amendment [ ] Change Impact : Customer Drawing/Specification[ ] In-House [ ] Vendor [
Reference Document Name/ Type: Document/ Drawing/ Specification No.: Revision No.:. Associated Part No.:.. Model:.. Customer: Document/ Drawing / Specification Reference S. No. Present Proposed Reason for Change
Design /Spec. Change Cost Reduction Process Simplification/ Improvement Requirement of Vendor Continual Improvement/ Kaizen
*Please attach supporting document if required
Justification for Change Improvement in Performance/ Quality Standardization Requirement of Customer Corrective/ Preventive Action Other:.
Expected Time taken / Date of Implementation ( After Approval):. Prepared By: H.O.D. : _______________________________For Engineering Cell Use only_______________________________ Remarks:. .. Does it Requires Customer Approval Yes [ ] No [ ] others: Decision: Change Approved [ ] Change Rejected [ ] Review required [ ] If Approved Date of Implementation : Verified By:.
Note: All ECN from customer to be reviewed within 2 working weeks after receipt
Approved By:.
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR ECN No
DOC NO : OAL-IC-IF-021/00 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTE DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01 Date :..
Item Name______________________________________ Proposer Name/ Date:_____________________ Operation Name/No_______________________________ Designation ____________________________ Model:_______________________ Customer:________________________________________________ Drg. Spec/Process Spec.___________________________________________________________________ Existing Drawing No______________________________ Suggested Change: Justification for Change Design /Spec. Change Improvement in Performance/ Quality Cost Reduction Standardization Process Simplification/ Improvement Requirement of Customer Requirement of Vendor Other :..
Doc. No. Change Target Date Actual Date Tooling/ Others Press Tool Receiver Gauge In House Receiver Gauge BOP Jig/ Fixture Material Size Material Specification/Grade Consumables BOPs Instruments/ MMDs Other.. Change
[ [ [ [ [ [ [
] ] ] ] ] ] ]
Expected Change required in following Document/ Tooling (Tick as applicable)

Document Title Master List Receipt Inspection Standard Final Inspection Standard Process Flow diagram PFMEA Control Plan Operation Standard BOM Drawings Receiver gauge drawing Tool/ Jig/ Fixture Drawing Process Qualification Records Others . Resp.
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
[ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [ [
] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]
ACTION TAKEN BY THE DEPTS / SECTIONS Drawing/Specification holder must destroy the old drg/ specification after start of implementation as per ECN Target Date Dept/ Section/ Area Actual Remarks Date Sample Implementation Date Submission on S/Floor Tool Room Target Manufacturing Actual Quality Assurance Purchase & Store Issued to: Dispatch MFG [ ] T.Room [ ] Dev. [ ] Vendor Development QA [ ] S.Room [ ] Purchase[ ] Development Team V.Dev.[ ] .. [ ] .[ ] Prepared by:.. Approved by:..
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-022/00 LIST OF STANDARDS / DATE : 17.11.2007 EXTERNAL ORIGIN DOCUMENTS PAGE NO: 01 OF 01
UPDATED ON: Type of Standard:..

S. No. Standard / Document Document Name Document No.
Page No:
Distribution Record (Date & Dept.) Edition / Rev No.
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
S. No. DRG. NO. PART NO.
LIST OF CUSTOMER/ EXTERNAL ORIGIN DRAWINGS

DESCRIPTION MODEL ORIGINAL DRG. AVAILABLE TRACING AVAILABLE
DOC NO : OAL-IC-IF-023/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

REV & DATE AUTO CAD DRG. REF. NO. REMARKS
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
(MANESAR) Date:.. EXISTING MACHINE [
DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-024/00 MACHINE OUTPUT : 17.11.2007 ASSESSMENT/TRIAL RUN DATE PAGE NO : 01 OF 01 REPORT ] NEW MACHINE [ ]
Machine Name:Model: . Machine No.: Machine Specifications: Speed:. Feed:.. Capacity:... Load:. Motor Rating:.. Dimensions:.. Others:. Manufacturer: Contact Person/ No.:. Problem Associated Installation/ Commissioning Detail : ............................................................................................................................................................. .......................................................................................................................................................................... .....................................................................................................................................................................
TRIAL RESULT:Machine Parameters S. No. Parameter Specified Actual Remarks
Part/ Product Testing S. No. Parameter
Specified
Actual
Cp/Cpk
Remarks
Environment, Health and Safety Issues:.. . Recommendations/ Remarks:.. .. .. .. .. Status: Accepted [ ] Requires Modification/Rectification[ ] Rejected [ ] OEM/Repaired By: Note: Attach Separate Sheets (if required)
Maintenance
Assessed By:
OMAX AUTOS LTD.
MANESAR
M.P SHEET
DOC NO : OAL-IC-IF-025/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01
NAME OF PLANT: APPLICABILITY
EXISTING EQUIPMENT MACHINE NAME: CONTENTS (BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED)
NEW EQUIPMENT MACHINE NUMBER:
KEYWORDS (encircle appropriate detail in each column) - to be filled by screening committee only after acceptance
CLASSIFICATION 1)Reliability 2)Maintainability 3)Jishu hozen ability 4)Operatibility 5)Energy saving 6)Safety 7)Cost saving (recurring/fix) 8)Improvement: productivity/quality SCOPE OF IMPROVEMENT 1)All equipment 2)Specific to plant & Operation 3)Specify 4)Similar equipment 5)(Pl. specify) . IMPLEMENTATION PRIORITY 1)Mandatory 2)Desirable 3)Explore possibility STORAGE WITH (IN FORM OF) 1)Works Engg.(Common specification) 2)R&D 3)Plant(s):.... (Equipment specification) UTILISATION STAGE 1)Investment Proposal 2)Input-Output Specification 3)Negotiation & Ordering 4)Design Approval 5)Manufacturing Stage 6)Inspection & Trials 7)Installation & Commissioning 8)Initial Phase Control
Signature Dates Comments
Originator
Approver (HOD)
Approval 1. Yes 2. No
Yes
4)Projects (Check sheet/Technical data) Screening Committee 1. Accept Accept MP Information registration Regn. No. Regn. Date 2.Reject
Special circulation to plant through CORPORATE TPM CELL (if Horizontal deployment is possible )
Pl. tick
Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrol
OMAX AUTOS LTD. (LOCATION)
FMEA ( PARTS )
DOC NO. : OAL-IC-IF-026/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE : 01 OF 01
Product Na me Parts Name
Item No. Function of parts Defect Mode
Ma nufacturer
Model
Evaluation Point Ree valuation a fte r Measures Take n Cause of Degree of Degree of Degree of Contents of Degree of Degree of Degree of Effects of the Defect the DefectOccurrence Effects Detection Importance Measures Importance Detection Effects occurrence
OMAX AUTOS LTD. (LOCATION)
FMEA ( ASSEMBLY ) FMEA (2/2) FMEA (1/2)
Product Name
Item No.
Manufacturer
Model Evaluation Point (Above the standard of 20 points) Reevaluation after Measures Taken Degree Contents Cause of of Degree of Degree of of Degree of Degree of Degree of the Defect Occurrence Effects Detection Importance Measures Importance Detection Effects occurrence
Functions
Function of parts
Defect Mode
Effects of the Defect
O A A T SL D M X UO T . ( O A IO ) L CT N T M -------------o r ------------.Q d p - - - Dp r e t r s o s lef r o c r e c A e t.- - - > e atmn e p n ib o c ur n e Q D p - - - >R la ds fs A e t. - - - e te taf
T O B EM N G M N S E T R U L A A E E T HE
D CN . : O LI -F0 8 0 O O A -C - 2 /0 I DT A E : 1 .1 .2 0 7 1 07 PG A E :0 O 0 1 F 1
R f r n eN. .. eee c o D te .. a S c n .. e tio
T s e t ( ) f r R c r e c Pe e t n M h e 3 o e ur n e r v nio
To b r u le . I m te .
Dp r e t r s o s le e atmn e p n ib f r o ue c . o c r ne S c nmn g r e tio a a e . I s e tio n p c n .. P r o inc ag es n hr e
Me gDtea dT e: .. Fo to e tin a n im rm me gp r s .. e tin atie mr e . ak t Ta in ..; r in g E is n eo Nn x ta c o D ta( s e ts x te c r o e is n e f a h e ) Cu e as Cu tema ue on r es r s
Dp r e t r s o s lef r Oc r e c e atmn e p n ib o c ur n e E p n e I c re x e s s n ur d I detepne n ir c x e s s Eeu n x c tio Wo? h Wa isd n b w e ? ht oe y hn O w a h sd n b w e ? r ht a oe y hn
De t E p n e ir c x e s s
f ilueL s S mo a r o s y b ls E e u nc nir a n x c tio o f mtio b S c nMn g r y e tio a a e b Q Dp y A e t.
D tr u dd p r e ts is ib te e atmn f r h r o ta d v lo mn o oiz n l ee p e t
P b R la n u lic e tio s S le as
OMAX AUTOS LTD. ( MANESAR ) FROM :.............................. TO :.................................... Feasibility Commitment Attached Contract Review Attached 1.Specific Req. Customer 2.Customer Benchmarking Data 3.Customer Legal Requirement S.N. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.
DEVELOPMENT LOI
DOC NO. : OAL -IC-IF-029/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE : 01 OF 02 REQUEST DATE :........../.........../.................. YES YES NO NO
Component Name : Part No. Drg Rev. no. Unit Price : : :
Annual Projected Volume :
OMAX AUTOS LTD. ( MANESAR )
DEVELOPMENT LOI
DOC NO. : OAL -IC-IF-029/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE : 02 OF 02
6. 7.
Annual Sale Projection : Customer Target Date 1.PPAP : :
2.SOP
8. 9.
: : :
ROC EBIDTA
REMARKS IF ANY :
PREPARED BY :................................................................ APPROVED BY :.....................................................................
OMAX AUTOS LTD. ( MANESAR )
PART CODE REQUEST FORM
DOC NO. : OAL -IC-IF-030/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE : 01 OF 01
OMAX AUTOS LTD. ( LOCATION ) MAKE SPECIFICATIONS SN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 MODEL
COMPARISON SHEET
RECOMMENDA TION :
OMAX AU TOS LTD . (LOC ATION )
SALES PLAN FOR N EXT FOU R YEARD OC N O. :OAL-IC -IF-032/00 D ATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE : 01 OF 01
D E SC R IPTION 2006-07 SALES(net of excise &taxes) RAW MA TERIAL %age STORE AND TOOLS %age JOB W ORK AND FRIEGHT %age C ONTRA C T LABOUR %age SALARY AND W AGES %age REPAIR AND MAINTENANC E %age POW ER AND FUEL %age AD M. EX PENSIVES %age SELLING AND D ISTRIBUTION %age C ORPORA TE EXPENSIVES %age Expenses excluding R M Expenses %age Expenses including R M Expenses %age PROFIT BEFORE ID T Profit % age N on Operating Income
PBIDT
166.17 114.86 69.12 4.57 2.75 2.24 1.35 5.80 3.49 8.81 5.30 0.88 0.53 6.07 3.65 2.24 1.35 2.43 1.46 1.79 1.08 34.83 20.96 149.69 90.08 16.48 9.92% 1.75 18.23 10.97%
Existing 180.05 124.23 69.00 4.95 2.75 2.43 1.35 6.28 3.49 9.54 5.30 0.95 0.53 6.57 3.65 2.43 1.35 2.63 1.46 1.80 1.00 37.59 20.88 161.83 89.88 18.22 10.12% 1.75 19.97 11.09%
PER IOD 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 R ail/D ef Omx-D hr Omx-D hr Omx-D hr Omx-D hr 10.00 190.05 189.68 191.00 192.00 5.00 50.00 0.28 2.75 0.20 2.00 0.30 3.00 0.53 5.30 0.05 0.53 0.37 3.65 0.50 5.00 0.50 5.00 0.10 1.00 2.82 28.23 7.82 78.23 2.18 21.77% 0.00 2.18 21.77% 129.23 68.00% 5.23 2.75% 2.63 1.38% 6.58 3.46% 10.07 5.30% 1.01 0.53% 6.94 3.65% 2.93 1.54% 3.13 1.65% 1.90 1.00% 40.42 21.27% 169.65 89.27% 20.40 10.73% 1.75 22.15 11.65%
14.37%
Profit % age
Growth
130.88 69.00 5.22 2.75 2.56 1.35 6.62 3.49 10.05 5.30 1.01 0.53 6.92 3.65 2.56 1.35 2.77 1.46 1.90 1.00 39.61 20.88 170.48 89.88 19.20 10.12% 1.75 20.95 11.04%
-0.19%
131.79 69.00 5.25 2.75 2.58 1.35 6.67 3.49 10.12 5.30 1.01 0.53 6.97 3.65 2.58 1.35 2.79 1.46 1.91 1.00 39.88 20.88 171.67 89.88 19.33 10.12% 1.75 21.08 11.04%
0.70%
132.48 69.00 5.28 2.75 2.59 1.35 6.70 3.49 10.18 5.30 1.02 0.53 7.01 3.65 2.59 1.35 2.80 1.46 1.92 1.00 40.09 20.88 172.57 89.88 19.43 10.12% 1.75 21.18 11.03%
N ote: C ost savings of 1.75% w ould be net off w ith the Increased C ost. Note:
OMAX AUTOS LTD. MANESAR
INSTALLATION & COMMISSIONING DETAIL OF EQUIPMENT
DOC NO.: OAL-IC-IF-033/00 DATE: 17.11.2007 PAGE: 01 OF 01
MACHINE NAME: SHOP NAME:.. REQUIREMENT DETAIL: SN. REQUIREMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 LAND SPACE POWER AIR COOLANT OIL (PLEASE SPECIFY) ANY OTHER ANY OTHER AVAILABILITY WITH UNITS REQUIRED STATUS REMARK IF ANY
STARTING DATE OF INSTALLATION: FINISHING DATE OF INSTALLATION:. OUTSIDE PARTY IF ANY:. PROBLEM/ OBSERVATION DURING INSTALLATION: 1. 2. 3. 4. RESULT OF TRIAL RUN CYCLE TIME PLANNED PRODUCT QUALITY PARAMETERS CYCLE TIME ACHIEVED
HAND- OVER DETAIL: DEPT. PRODUCTION HEAD SECTION INCHARGE QUALITY MAINTENANCE
SIGN.
REMARK IF ANY

Ic Format 3

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ic Format 3

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

PRODUCT QUALITY PLANNING TIMING PLAN CUM PROGRESS REVIEW MEETING

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-003/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer S.No. 1.

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-004/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Engineering Performance Specification

2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer S. No. 1. 2. : :

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-005/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Comments / Action Required

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

TEAM FEASIBILITY COMMITMENT

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-006/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 02

Date : ..// Part Name : Customer : Feasibility Considerations:

Part Number Vehicle / Model

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

TEAM FEASIBILITY COMMITMENT

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-006/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 02 OF 02

CONCLUSION : PL. TICK ( ) Feasible [ ] Not Feasible [ ] CFT COMMENTS

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part name: Customer: S. No. Part name

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-007/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Vehicle/ Model ] Weight Gross Net Remarks

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-008/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer S. No. 1 : :

PRODUCT / PROCESS QUALITY SYSTEM REVIEW

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-009/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13.

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer

LISTING OF SPECIAL CHARACTERISTICS

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-010/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIORNMENT/SAFETY/HEALTH RELATED ISSUES FOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Model :

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-011/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

2.4 3. 3.1 3.2

(Signature) CFT Leader

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer SR. No. : :

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-012/00 DATE : 17.11.2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

Product Special Characteristics (In-house or Specified by Customer)

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled

OMAX AUTOS LTD.

MANESAR Part Name Customer

PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE OF THE CROSS FUNCTIONAL TEAM Part Number :

DOC NO :OAL-IC-IF-013/00 DATE : 17.11..2007 PAGE NO: 01 OF 01

(HEAD-PE / CFT LEADER )

Note: This is Electronic Controlled document, Printout/photocopy will be treated as uncontrolled