COMMENT RESOLUTION SHEET

Project Title: Comment Reference: Document Title: COSV AND SF COSV/SF/ CRS -01 Final MDR from L&T Valdel Project No.: Document Date: Revision No.: 23/5/11 00

. Comment No

BGEPIL Comment

Contractor Response

BGEPIL Comment to BGEPIL Comment Contractor response. after review of files as on 13/08/11.

01

There is no Master index provided for the submitted files

All the 4 volumes contains index sheet with description of document available in the folder.
Filing was done discipline wise and index sheet is available for all volumes. It is not clear as what is traceable. Please clarify Please include spacers between various sections within the same volume. Eg: where COSV section ends and SFX starts Please remove this note as it is not relevant anymore.

Master list for the total submission not provided

Verified and Closed

Master list prepared now by BG

02

Contents in each files are not known nor traceable

Volume no 01 Piping Isometrics 03

All Isometrics drawing under these volume has got a common comment under note-2 as Vent and drain required for hydrotesting are not indicated, it shall be decided by construction contractor Revision status on all the isometric drawing indicates X as As- Built, where as a revision triangle with revision no is shown next to the cloud. This revision no does not exist in the revision history. This is a standard note, which will be written in all ISOs, please let us know the action needed to be taken against this comment. Verified and Closed

05

Bubbles and revision triangle need not be a part of final as built drawings.
1. Note-22 on the red line markup was meant to indicate heat tracing and insulation. The symbol used for this has already been indicated in the Legend. This Note was therefore not provided on the P&IDs. Please refer P&ID BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-PR11-COSV-0309-D which had the same comment. Clouds were used to indicate Detail Engineering Scope of Work and not revision. Changes are only indicated by Revision triangles. This is the philosophy that has been followed throughout the

Verified and Closed

06

AS-BUILT P&ID no. BGEP-LTVA-P120PPAX-PR-11-COSV-0305 Rev01 was cross verified with the Mathew provided Red line mark up drawing no. BGEP-LTVA-P120PPAX-PR-11-COSV-0305 Rev00. Following are the observation. 1. Note - 22 mentioned on the red line mark is not included in the AS- Built drawing. 2. AS- built drawing shows revision triangle, but not the cloud on changes. 3. Red line mark up shows Insulation done for line connecting to nozzle

2.

1. Accepted 1. Noted 2. As-built drawings 2. Revised drawing need not to have shows a triangle revision triangles with revision 01, 3. Please effect the whereas the change revision history has got no records of 01 indicated. 3. No updation to show insulation for lines from both nozzles done on the submitted P&ID.

2 Raised with LTV. LTV will be sending the modified pdf file via email. 3 Raised with LTV. LTV will be sending the modified pdf file via email.

Page 1 of 4

COMMENT RESOLUTION SHEET

Project Title: Comment Reference: Document Title: COSV AND SF COSV/SF/ CRS -01 Final MDR from L&T Valdel Project No.: Document Date: Revision No.: 23/5/11 00

. Comment No

BGEPIL Comment

Contractor Response

BGEPIL Comment to BGEPIL Comment Contractor response. after review of files as on 13/08/11.

N7A / 2, but the same is not 3. capture in the As- Built.

project. Red line mark up does not show insulation for nozzle N7A / 2. However it does show insulation for N7B / 2. Therefore the P&ID shall be updated to show insulation for lines from both nozzles.

08

As- built of FIRE & GAS DETECTOR LAYOUT BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-IN-02COSV-1003- Rev X, does not reflects changes done as per the red line mark . No revision triangle and cloud mark is shown.

09

As- built of JUNCTION BOX WIRING DETAILS BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-IN-11COSV-1002-D- Rev X, does not reflects changes done as per the red line mark . No revision triangle and cloud mark is shown.

10

As- built of JUNCTION BOX WIRING DETAILS BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-IN-11COSV-1002-D- Rev X, notes still shows statements such as shall be and to be for activities. As- Built of BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-ST04-COSV-0004-D Rev- X , COSV vessel Access platform details [at EL (+) 34.575], does not reflect additional platform of 940mm x 2400mm done to the access platform as shown and marked on the red line mark up drawing.

Generally the as-built drawing/documents will not carry the cloud/revision triangle. Hence we had removed the earlier revision changes in the as-built drawing/documents. Generally the as-built drawing/documents will not carry the cloud/revision triangle. Hence we had removed the earlier revision changes in the as-built drawing/documents The general notes should be carry forward till as-built stage of drawing/ document Hence the shall be and to be will be retained in the as-built drawing/documents

Accepted

Verified and Closed

Accepted

Verified and Closed

Accepted

Verified and Closed

11

Please modify the drawing to reflect the same

No action taken

The change has not been done under change management system. Engineering contractor wouldnt stamp this red line modification as Page 2 of 4

COMMENT RESOLUTION SHEET

Project Title: Comment Reference: Document Title: COSV AND SF COSV/SF/ CRS -01 Final MDR from L&T Valdel Project No.: Document Date: Revision No.: 23/5/11 00

. Comment No

BGEPIL Comment

Contractor Response

BGEPIL Comment to BGEPIL Comment Contractor response. after review of files as on 13/08/11. endorsed by its Engineeering team. We will raise an Internal CRS for the same and get the changer reviewed internally.

Volume - 2 13 As- Built for Piping GAD Main Deck area. Revision starts with 0 as AFC. No stage for Issued for Review/ Approval is made. Changes done to the drawing are not marked with the revision status i.e. revision triangle. Due to non usage of Hole guards all the drawing in the file is torn off during usage. Volume - 3 18 AS- Built of HAZOP close- out report Doc. No. BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-PR-08-COSV0901 Rev-X is submitted, wherein the column of BG Response and Final status for all the points are empty. There is no clarity whether the comment is open or closed. On Aconex the earlier rev 00 is with status C-2 - Approved, subject to comment. No separator / identification sheet is used for separation/ traceability of documents. Please fill in the relevant sections of HAZOP closeout report, so that no ambiguity remains in this safety critical document. BG balance sign-off The HAZOP report submitted has closed status for all the actionable items. Non actionable items not necessarily required to be written as closed Accepted Accepted by BGPM Accepted by BGPM
Verified and Closed

15

Accepted

16

Please provide the filed drawings with holegaurds

20

24

As- Built P&ID no. BGEP-LTVA-P120-PPAX-PR-11COSV-0304 is Rev- X. But all the changes done within the cloud indicates Rev 01, but as per revision history

Please provide spacers for various sections with the volume. As built drawings need not have any revision triangles.

Verified and Closed

BG balance

sign-off

Raised with LTV. LTV will be sending the Page 3 of 4

COMMENT RESOLUTION SHEET

Project Title: Comment Reference: Document Title: COSV AND SF COSV/SF/ CRS -01 Final MDR from L&T Valdel Project No.: Document Date: Revision No.: 23/5/11 00

. Comment No

BGEPIL Comment

Contractor Response

BGEPIL Comment to BGEPIL Comment Contractor response. after review of files as on 13/08/11. modified pdf file via email.

there is no such status as Rev -01

26

Additional comments Out of 343 documents of L&T Valdel submitted on Aconex following are the status for the same. Issued for Approval / Comment / Review & comment 53 nos. Approved subject to comments - 6 nos. Issued for construction 125 nos. As-built 132 nos. With documents with above status project close out w.r.t Aconex cannot be done. (See appendix 1) Roji Abraham Checked by

Document count includes all the documents uploaded till now in Aconex. Normally deliverables like MTOs, RFQs , process data sheets( will go in to PS) are not issued as As built. There can not be one to one comparison of DCI or uploaded in Aconex Vs As builts issued.

The list finally should have As builts and other documents which are not issued as As builts so those are to be stamped as final.

Still Open

LTV is sending the final documentation DVD; We will get that uploaded in Aconex by stamping final as built. This should close this point.

Comme nted by

Dat e:

Page 4 of 4