Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Anthropology
In Search of an Identity:
Appropriating the framework of The Human Community within a Malaysian Context
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Table
of
Contents
Introduction
....................................................................................................................................
1
Understanding
the
society
.............................................................................................................
2
History
and
Ideology
...................................................................................................................
2
Race
............................................................................................................................................
3
Politics
and
Economics
...............................................................................................................
5
Religion
.......................................................................................................................................
7
Sociological
Analysis
.......................................................................................................................
9
Theological
appropriation
............................................................................................................
12
The
Christian
Challenge
............................................................................................................
13
Know
Yourself
.......................................................................................................................
13
Nurturing
the
Faith
within
the
Community
..........................................................................
14
Communion
within
the
Faith
Community
............................................................................
14
Communion
with
the
whole
Society
....................................................................................
15
The
Call
to
be
Prophetic
Agents
of
Hope
and
Change
..........................................................
17
Conclusion
....................................................................................................................................
18
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
.............................................................................................................................
19
Figures
Figure
1.Racial
Distribution
Between
1957
(Independence)
and
2004
(Current)
..........................
4
Figure
2.
The
Religions
in
Malaysia
(2005)
.....................................................................................
7
Tables
Table
1.Mean
monthly
household
income
by
ethnic
group
and
stratum,
Peninsular
Malaysia,
19702002
(Malaysian
Ringgit
(RM))
.............................................................................................
6
i
|
P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
In
Search
of
an
Identity
In
these
past
years
of
nation-building,
we
have
not
become
less
Malay,
less
Indian,
or
less
Chinese
but
we
have
all
become
more
Malaysian.
Ling
Liong
Sik,
Malaysian
Chinese
Association,
Secretary-Generals
Report
1993:9
Introduction
Malaysia
is
probably
the
most
unique
country
in
South-East
Asia
in
terms
of
its
ethnic
diversity
and
cultural
plurality.
Unlike
many
of
its
neighbouring
countries,
which
have
spent
great
effort
to
nationalize
its
citizen
into
a
uniform
lot,
Malaysia
had,
during
its
independence
negotiation
known
as
the
bargain1,
decided
to
let
the
individual
races
(with
strong
majority
of
Malays,
Chinese
and
Indians)
preserve
their
cultural
roots
and
identify
as
a
part
of
a
diverse
whole.
Without
dwelling
into
the
pros
and
cons
of
the
decision,
the
move
had
definitely
created
a
unique
sociological
reality.
For
most
Asian
countries,
citizens
generally
identify
themselves
primarily
with
their
nationality.
However,
Malaysians
tend
to
identify
themselves
with
their
race
prior
to
their
nationality.
It
is
common
to
hear
Malaysians
introducing
themselves
as
Malaysian
Chinese/Indians/Eurasian
rather
than
just
Malaysians.
Aside
from
the
strong
ethnic
identity,
another
unique
feature
of
the
country
is
also
its
general
freedom
for
people
to
practice
their
own
religion2.
Religious
tensions
at
the
micro-level
are
unavoidable,
but
within
the
macro-level
all
religions
still
flourish
and
grow.
With
these
and
other
factors
imbued
within
the
societal
structure
of
Malaysia,
it
is
no
wonder
that
even
up
till
now,
the
search
for
a
national
identity
of
the
country
is
still
on-going
and
evolving.
Some
obvious
manifestation
of
this
is
the
recent
move
to
create
national
greeting
gesture,
something
similar
to
the
internationally
well
know
konichiwa-bow
gesture
of
the
Japanese,
sawadee-wai
gesture
of
the
Thais
or
even
the
mano
po
gesture
of
the
Filipinos.
The
proposed
gesture
of
putting
the
right
hand
across
ones
heart
with
a
slight
bow
have
not
really
took
flight
yet
and
many
debates
are
still
on-going
as
to
how
truly
the
gesture
can
be
internalized
as
the
universal
greeting
style
of
the
country.
1
See ___, Culture of MalaysiaHistory and Ethnic Relations, Urbanism, Architecture and the Use of Space, Everyculture.com, http://www.everyculture.com/Ja-Ma/Malaysia.html 2 Although Islam is the national religion of Malaysia, the constitution of the country ensures freedom to practice any religion and the individual's right to worship, with the exception that public evangelization of other religious group to a Muslim (Article 11(4) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia) is prohibited and conversion away from Islam is highly discouraged (partly due to the fact it is extremely difficult for Muslims to convert, as there are serious implications under Islamic law.
1 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Recently an acclaimed Malaysian artist, Peter Teo, pioneered a 15Malaysia3 project. It gathered some of the best young-filmmakers of the country to produce 15 short films as a form self-reflection of Malaysias identity through a social-political perspective. The results of which was a poignant and powerful visual representation of the complexity of the social dynamics of Malaysia. It garnered tremendous resonance among the huge pool of viewers, who also expressed their unified voice of their continual search of what is truly Malaysia. The current Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak also spearheaded the 1Malaysia4 campaign to promote unity and mutual respect and trust among the different ethnic communities in Malaysia. It stirred up great amount of heated rhetoric on the trickiness and mix-sentiment of such goal. In short, this ideology is a very good start, but is far from blossom fruition. Under such circumstances, how would Catholics situate themselves within the growing identity of the country? How would they best serve and proclaim the faith? How could they best see their role within the society? I would therefore like to explore this search through the paradigm of Catholics, studying through a social and theological anthropological framework. Special attention would be given to the appropriation of anthropological concept of human community. It is my hope that this study could shed some light as to what is the best self-identity a Catholic can assume so as to be true proclaimers of the Kingdom of God in a unique and trying society.
15Malaysia is a project is produced by Pete Teo and sponsored by P1, showcasing 15 short films directed by well known local directors, and featuring socio-political subject matters from corruption, race relations, inflation, Islamic banking, social apathy, ethical commerce, pedophilia, government health warnings and so on. See http://15malaysia.com 4 See http://www.1malaysia.com.my
2 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
(Malaysian Indian Congress) during the formation of post-colonial Malaysia (at that time called Malaya) in 1957. As a result of the bargaining, non-Malay ethnic groups such as the Chinese and Indians were granted citizenship and their legitimate interests (economic rights), their rights of citizenshipand residence as well as theirfreedom to preserve, practice and propagate their religion, culture and language were recognized. 5 Enshrined in the Malaysian constitutions 6 were these ideologies of racial, religious, cultural and economical freedom and harmony. Equality before the law and protection by the law is stated in Article 8 of the constitution: there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent, gender or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment. Religious freedom is ensured in Article 11: Every person has the right to propagate his religion, but state law and, in respect of the Federal Territory, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religion, doctrine or belief among persons professing the Muslim religion. There is, however, freedom to carry on missionary work among non-Muslims. However, these ideologies, wonderful as they may be, do have its exceptions and limitations, along with the challenges in actualization. We would now therefore study the various aspects, looking into the two social reality7 to draw out the issues, challenges and complexities in each area.
Race
The
racial
population
distribution
had
morphed
quite
significantly
since
the
time
of
the
countrys
independence,
as
shown
in
Figure.1.
This
slow
and
steady
change
in
the
racial
distribution
is
caused
mainly
by
government
policies
encouraging
increase
birth
rate
among
Zainah Ibrahim, What Islam, Whose Islam?: Sisters in Islam and the Struggle for Womens Rights in The Politics of Multiculturalism. Ed. R W Hefner. (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2001), 128. 6 Constitution of Malaysia. http://confinder.richmond.edu/admin/docs/malaysia.pdf 7 The two social reality is the sociological approach suggested by A. Samsul to study the Malaysian society. It states that in most social phenomenon, identity formation takes place within a "two social reality" context: first, the "authority-defined" social reality, one which is authoritatively defined by people who are part of the dominant power structure; and, second, the "everyday-defined" social reality, one which is experienced by the people in the course of their everyday life. These two social realities exist side by side at any given time. See Samsul A, Debating about Identity in Malaysia: A Discourse Analysis. Southeast Asian Studies 34, no. 3 (December 1996): 477.
3 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
bumiputras 8 , providing various incentives and loans to families above certain household number. These policies derived their basis in the controversial and often quoted Article 153 in the constitution of Malaysia. 9
Indians 10%
1957
others Indians 8% 7%
2004
Chinese 35%
Malays 55%
Chinese 24%
Malays 61%
On the other hand, family of other races, facing the threat of economical inflation and educational cost, tend to control the size of the family to smaller numbers. The steady reduction of non-Malays population is starting to set off red alerts among both non-Malay politicians and citizens alike. Singapores minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew very recently predicted that Malaysian Chinese would continue to dwindle in numbers, and in 20 years time, the leadership [of Malaysia] would value the Chinese population less and less. He commented further that Very soon, [the Chinese] will be completely engulfed by the powerful waves of aggressive Islamisation.10 The Chinese political parties have been squabbling about the issue without seemingly heading anywhere, and people on the ground are starting to get frustrated about the whole matter. Many commentators and analysts are encouraging all to be more focused, more hopeful, and search for more useful solutions and high-calibre and farsighted leadership.
Bumiputra is a Malay term widely used in Malaysia. It has a wide definition but is generally accepted to refer to indigenous people and muslims with Malay tradition, and it recognizes the "special position" of these people provided in the Federal Constitution of Malaysia. 9 According to this article, those who profess the religion of Islam, habitually speak the Malay language, and conform to Malay customs are entitled for special reservation of quotas in three specific areas: public services, education, and business licenses, without harming the rights of other ethnic groups. Thus it is important to emphasize that Malaysia is founded not on individual rights but on what political theorists have come to refer to as ethnically differentiated citizenship. 10 Tay Tian Yan, The Clear and Present Danger, Sin Chew Daily, October 21, 2009.
4 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Despite this change in racial percentage, the various races besides the bumiputras (Chinese, Indian, and Eurasian) had all the while held strong to their racial identity. This is mainly sustained through the countrys education system which consists of vernacular (jenis) schools, allowing each race to study in their own native language. That aside, each race had also put in tremendous effort to aid in individual racial identification. The Chinese has maintained one of the highest standards in Chinese literacy among other South East Asian countries, and a core Chinese literary elite has ensured the sustenance and promotion of the language and culture through managing Chinese Independent Schools all across the country and running the Mandarin press. 11 The Indians had also maintained their high level of native literacy and culture through the schools and the Indian press.
This
event
catalyzed
the
introduction
of
the
New
Economic
Policy
(NEP),
an
affirmative
action
based
policy
as
a
measure
to
eradicate
poverty
amongst
the
Malays,
and
it
attempts
to
incorporate
Malays
into
the
Malaysian
economy
and
to
produce
more
middle-class
Malays.
This
policy
initially
drew
outrage
from
the
Chinese
community
but
they
were
forced
to
silently
acquiesce
to
the
demands
of
NEP
due
to
their
lack
of
political
power.
As
a
result,
Chinese
businessmen
learned
to
adapt
to
the
policy
by
working
with
the
Malays
to
produce
a
successful
and
healthy
working
relationship.
11
See Wen Cui, [The Spirit of Chinese Education Promotion within Malaysian Chinese Society ], Guang Hua daily , Septemper 13 , 2001. 12 Chirstopher R. Yeoh, "Malaysia, truly Asia? Religious Pluralism in Malaysia." The Pluralism Project.:13.
5 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
The NEP was successful in producing a new generation of middle-class Malays while eradicating poverty at the same time. The level of education among the Malays also improved tremendously. It was reported that between the early 1970s and 1993, middle-class Malays burgeoned from 18 percent to 28 percent of the population. Table 1 shows the income trend of the various races since independence till now.
Table 1.Mean monthly household income by ethnic group and stratum, Peninsular Malaysia, 1970 2002 (Malaysian Ringgit (RM))
Despite the win-win situation of the above move, many were questioning if this achievement has led to national unity, understood in terms of improved interethnic relations. There was still residual discontent by minority groups of Malays who think that the NEP only benefitted selected portion of Malays, and also some of the minor racial groups, who felt that they were further marginalized. This lingering disgruntlement sparked some social reaction within the country. For the Malays, it was said that Islamic insurgence was a direct consequence, and it exacerbated the growing hostility between Malays and non-Malays. Very recently in November 2007, more than 10,000 Indians took to the street to protest against unfair treatment against them in many areas including education, business and politics. 13
13
See Robin Brant, Malaysia's Lingering Ethnic Divide, BBC News, 4 March, 2008, and Preston Merchant, Malaysias Indian Community Struggles for Minority Rights, SAJA Forum, 4 February, 2008.
6 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Although most of these reactions were being dealt with in various forms and the harmony of the country was not greatly affected, the enduring sentiment still signals the strong sense of internal social shift towards a desirable equilibrium, and everyone is still constantly in search of their stand, their position and their identity within this constant change.
Religion
Despite
the
Muslim
majority,
Malaysia
is
not
an
Islamic
state.
Instead,
Malaysia
is
considered
to
be
a
Malay
dominated
plural
society
and
the
freedom
of
practicing
other
religions
is
granted
to
everyone. 14
Figure
2
shows
a
breakdown
of
religions
in
term
of
percentage
in
Malaysia.
The
religion
percentage
distribution
in
Malaysia
has
remained
relatively
stable,
although
due
to
increased
population,
the
absolute
amount
has
increased
throughout
the
years.
Currently,
there
is
an
estimate
of
more
than
2
million
Christian
in
the
country.
Buddhist 19%
Muslim 60%
Although the system of religious tolerance has created an environment of relative peace on the surface, religious tension is still a known reality within the country. The call of some Muslim toward stronger fundamentalism to combat moral decadence, and the lament of other religions on the restrictions and difficulties in evangelization and growth had been gradually surfacing and it had caused some notable tensions in the recent past.
14
Chirstopher R. Yeoh, "Malaysia, truly Asia? Religious Pluralism in Malaysia." The Pluralism Project.:2.
7 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Some
of
the
notable
recent
religious
feuds
includes
that
of
Lina
Joy 15
and
Revathi
Massosai16,
both
cases
which
attracted
great
media
coverage
and
garnering
great
debate
on
how
truly
religious
freedom
is
exercised
in
Malaysia.
The
Catholics
have
been
having
their
fare
share
of
religious
tension
in
the
country
recently.
Earlier
in
the
year
Catholics
were
being
accused
of
trying
to
convert
2
Muslims
in
a
local
university,
and
later
on,
9
Christians
were
arrested
on
charges
in
wanting
to
convert
a
Muslim
to
Christianity
in
the
university.17
On
a
larger
scale,
the
relatively
strong
foundation
of
religious
harmony
has
been
significantly
destabilized
through
the
on-going
clash
on
the
use
of
Allah
for
God
in
the
countrys
weekly
Catholic
magazine.
The
Malaysian
authority
that
banned
the
use
of
Allah
for
the
magazine
had
reasoned
out
that
the
use
of
this
word
would
confuse
the
Muslims
(As
Allah
is
used
to
depict
God
in
Islam).18
When
the
recent
court
ruling
came
out
permitting
Allah
to
be
used
by
non-Muslims,
a
series
of
unprecedented
reactions
surfaced.
Within
days
of
the
ruling,
11
churches
across
the
country
were
targeted,
either
vandalized
with
paint
splashed
on
the
perimeter,
or
attacked
with
Molotov
cocktail
bombs.19
Even
more
unrest
was
sparked
when
pig
heads
were
found
outside
two
of
the
mosques. 20
Although
many
has
commented
that
these
acts
were
orchestrated
by
a
minority
group
of
troublemakers,
and
the
events
had
created
some
positive
15
Lina Joy is a Malay convert from Islam to Christianity. She applied to have her conversion legally recognized by the Malaysian courts. Though her change of name was recognized in 1999 and so noted on her identity card, her change of religion was not (since it is without the Mahkamah Syariah confirmation document); for this reason, she filed suit with the High Court in 1999, bypassing the Syariah Court (Islamic court). She later filed suit with the Federal Court in 2006. Joy hopes to live openly as a Christian; she was forced to go into hiding by the publicity surrounding her case. See ___, Lina Joy,, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Joy 16 Revathi Massosai is a Malaysian woman who was raised as a Hindu but her identity card designates her as a Muslim. She has declared her religion to be Hindu and has petitioned unsuccessfully to have the word "Islam" removed from her identity card. Massosai married a Hindu man, but her marriage is not recognized by the Malaysian government because of the religion issue. Massosai was incarcerated for six months in an Islamic re- education camp because of her attempts to renounce Islam in favour of the Hindu religion. Revathi was denied the guardianship of her new born baby and was not allowed to meet her Hindu husband. See ___. Freedom of Religion in Malaysia, Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_religious_freedom_in_Malaysia 17 See ___, MALAYSIA: Christian Youths Accused of Trying to Convert Muslims, Union of Catholic Asian News, 15 July, 2009. 18 See ___, Malaysia: "Allah" Banned in Catholic Newspaper, UNHCR Refworld (Committee to Protect Journalist), 4 August,2008. 19 See Liz Gooch, Under Cloud of Violence, Malaysian Christians Come Together, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/18/world/asia/18iht-church.html, (accessed February 9, 2010). and Robert Spencer, Malaysia: Even More Churches Firebombed over the use of Word Allah, Catholic Online, http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=35163accessed February 9,2010. 20 See ___, Pig Head left at Malaysia Mosque after Allah Row, BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8435975.stm, (accessed February 2010).
8 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
effect in uniting Christians in their stand21, along with supports from level headed Muslim personnel, the tensions have not yet subsided and many are still on a high alert for further problematic outbreaks due the inherent discontent. All this on-going tension has left a bad taste behind the veil of religious tolerance. Many are questioning the authorities in many of their moves and discontentment is rising.
Sociological
Analysis
The
understanding
of
the
social
dynamics
through
a
theoretical
framework
would
ideally
help
one
to
disentangle
issues
that
are
dramatizing
on
the
surface
with
its
complexity
and
intermingling,
and
therefore
allows
one
to
see
the
underlying
interactions
more
clearly.
As
has
been
detailed
above,
the
social
situation
of
Malaysia
is
truly
a
complex
one.
The
government
and
political
parties
have,
since
the
time
of
independence,
tried
very
hard
to
achieve
a
conducive
and
harmonious
society
for
the
nation.
However,
due
to
the
inherent
inequality
in
the
independence
bargain,
the
point
of
balance
requires
great
amount
of
understanding,
humility
and
even
compromise
from
all
citizens,
and
is
truly
an
incredible
reality
to
achieve.
There
is
obviously
an
imbalance
that
is
strongly
felt
by
the
people,
as
discontentment
and
unease
is
brewing
among
the
general
masses.
These
inertial
energies
seem
to
be
growing
steadily,
and
are
manifested
in
various
events
that
are
slowly
popping
up
across
the
country,
be
it
as
a
reaction
to
political,
racial
or
economical
issues.
I
would
firstly
like
to
utilize
Habermas
System-Lifeworld22
concept
to
situate
the
social- political
reality
of
Malaysia.
Due
to
the
historical
situation,
since
the
independence
bargain,
there
had
already
been
a
strong
exertion
of
the
system
over
how
the
lifeworld
was
to
operate.
The
various
political
parties
(presenting
primarily
different
races)
came
to
the
agreement
on
how
the
country
would
function,
stating
specific
terms
in
the
constitution
of
the
rights
of
the
citizens.
21
See ___, Malaysia Allah Dispute Under Control Despite Vandalism, Catholic News Agency, http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/malaysian_allah_dispute_under_control_despite_vandalism, (accessed February 9, 2010). 22 This concept stems mainly from Habermas communicative action theory, which touches on how the encroachment of market system and bureaucratic authorities into day to day social relationships resulting in the erosion of human qualities. The lifeworld is broadly defined as the realm of everyday communicative life, and the system is defined as government bureaucracy, legal systems and market economy.
9 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
We
could
therefore
argue
that
there
had
already
been
a
strong
uncoupling
of
the
system
and
the
lifeworld
in
the
very
first
place.
It
is
in
a
way
a
necessity
for
the
country
at
that
time
to
begin
functioning.
However,
as
time
went
by
and
the
systems
colonization
of
the
lifeworld
grew
stronger,
the
lifeworld
would
undoubtedly
sense
this
distortion
in
communication
and
start
to
exert
reactions,
be
it
constructive
or
destructive
ones.
Adding
to
the
plane
of
complexity
is
the
contestation
within
the
ethnicity.
Although
the
racial
differences
within
Malaysia
are
strong,
according
Stuart
Halls
theory
on
ethnicity,
Malaysians
could
truly
see
themselves
as
an
ethnic
group
due
to
their
shared
context,
temporality
and
cultural
affinities
through
the
historical
development.
However,
many
of
the
countrys
issues
of
disgruntlement
stemmed
from
the
insistent
of
one
group
(the
bumiputras)
to
exert
hegemony
over
the
others.
Again,
this
has
its
roots
from
the
countrys
constitution
article
153
and
actualized
in
many
policies
such
as
the
NEP
and
the
educational
Quota
23
system.
While
one
could
argue
that
this
was
the
original
agreement
of
the
bargain,
sociologically,
the
domination
of
one
group
over
the
others
will
never
lead
to
total
balance
of
ethnicity.
The
logical
way
forward
to
achieve
a
new
ethnicity,
one
where
the
site
of
contestation
within
the
ethnicity
could
be
eliminated,
would
require
a
re-balancing
of
all
within
the
ethnic
group.
That
would
entail
an
almost
altruistic
move
of
the
bumiputras
to
relinquish
their
special
privileges
and
for
the
rest
to
understand
and
accept
the
gradual
transition.
A
far
fetch
dream
no
doubt,
but
one
with
rays
of
hope
trickling
down
as
more
and
more
bumiputras
themselves
are
openly
discussing
about
it.
Some
social
theories
are
able
to
provide
insights
in
dealing
with
this
complicated
situation.
A
foundational
understanding
of
these
theories
would
provide
greater
grounding
and
realistic
push
later
on
when
we
study
the
issue
through
the
perspective
of
theological
anthropology.
Two
important
aspects
from
social
theories
would
be
discussed
here:
1)
an
unbiased
understanding
of
the
situation
and
reality
(utilizing
Pierre
Bourdieus
conceptual
triad
of
habitus,
capital
and
field)24
and
2)
act
in
a
manner
that
would
bring
positive
changes
to
the
situation
(utilizing
Habermas
theory
of
communicative
action).
The
political-economical-religious-racial
reality
in
Malaysia
is
the
field
of
each
and
every
Malaysian.
It
is
the
locality
where
the
game
is
being
played.
Unless
one
chooses
to
be
totally
passive
and
shunts
out
the
society,
all
are,
by
the
nature
of
them
being
a
citizen,
actual
players
of
the
game-field.
23
See ___, Malaysia- Education System, BookRags, http://www.bookrags.com/research/malaysiaeducation- system-ema-04 (accessed 8 december, 2008). 24 It would be assumed here that readers have a basic understanding of the Pierre Bourdieus triad concept.
10 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
The
important
point
here
is
that
to
be
the
positive
agent
in
the
field,
one
must
fully
appreciate
its
habitus
or
feel
for
the
game.
Metaphorically,
by
having
the
feel
for
the
game,
we
will
be
able
to
control,
manoeuvre
and
strategize
how
to
best
play
the
game.
This
feel
for
the
game
is
only
achievable
by
those
who
live
within
the
reality
and
therefore
are
being
able
to
have
a
natural
intuition
of
the
reality.
Being
in
the
field
and
imbibing
the
habitus,
we
get
to
control
how
the
game
is
played
by
controlling
the
capital.
The
capital
is
the
stake
which
players
invest
themselves
in.
It
is
our
action
in
the
game
of
which
we
use
to
affect
the
outcome.
According
to
Bourdieu,
there
are
four
main
types
of
capital:
1)
Economic
2)
Cultural
3)Social
and
4)Symbolic.
Through
proper
usage
of
these
four
capital
we
are
able
to
make
our
voices
heard
and
make
changes
that
improve
the
lifeworld-system
balance.
In
the
Malaysian
reality,
there
have
been
good
examples
of
the
utilization
of
the
capital
to
affect
the
outcome
of
the
game.
The
15Malaysia
project
mentioned
in
the
introduction
is
one
good
example.
Another
example
would
the
online
news
website
Malaysiakini.
It
is
an
independent
news
site
that
takes
a
critical
view
on
the
politics
of
Malaysia.
Unlike
most
news
sources
in
Malaysia,
Malaysiakini
remains
free
from
government
regulation
and
thus
widely
considered
to
be
the
country's
only
credible,
independent
voice..25
To
add
to
the
capital
of
the
game,
or
to
be
a
better
and
more
attuned
positive
agent
within
the
society,
we
could
utilize
Habermas
Theory
of
Communicative
Action
in
promoting
both
critical
thought
and
practical
action.26
What
the
theory
emphasizes
is
that
as
a
member
of
the
society,
we
need
to
rationalize
and
critically
assess
the
realm
in
which
we
live
in.
With
such
critical
thought
we
would
be
able
to
gather
consensus,
expectations
and
intentions
which
we
believe
would
better
our
life
situations.
We
are
then
urged
to
apply
practical
action.
The
theory
calls
for:
active
involvement
of
the
actors
in
the
interaction
which
is
governed
by
binding
consensual
norms,
which
in
turn,
are
defined
by
their
mutual
expectations.
One
assumption
is
that
the
people
should
be
able
to
express
their
intentions
to
one
another
in
the
most
truthful
and
sincere
manner.
Such
communication
demands
open
and
uninterrupted
argumentation.
It
is
only
through
argumentation
that
people
can
determine
whether
an
agreement
is
genuine
or
communicatively
achieved,
as
well
as
have
a
basis
for
knowing
if
what
is
expressed
in
words
or
action
is
rational.27
25 26
___, Malaysiakini, Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysiakini (accessed 9December, 2009). Carlito M. Gaspar, Habermas Theory of Communicative Action, Philippines Studies 47 (1999): 409. 27 Ibid. 410.
11 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Theological
appropriation
Bourdieu
and
Habermas
prompted
and
aided
us
to
understand
the
complex
social
situation
in
Malaysia
and
our
position
within
it
in
a
clear
manner.
However,
as
Christians,
we
have
an
added
responsibility
and
duty
in
exercising
a
faith
response
to
the
situation.
Theological
Anthropology
pushes
us
a
step
forward
in
bringing
to
our
attention
that
we
are
very
much
an
integral
part
of
the
society,
that
the
core
idea
of
us
being
human
would
imply
that
we
are
part
of
the
Human
Community.
The
challenge
for
us
would
be
to
truly
own
up
and
bring
about
positiveness
as
a
basic
response
to
this
fundamental
Christian
identity.
The
Vatican
II
document
Gaudium
et
Spes
(GS)
takes
great
effort
to
put
forth
the
message
that
fundamentally
we
are
created
to
be
communitarian.
GS24
states
that:
God,
who
has
a
parents
care
for
all
of
us,
desired
that
all
men
and
women
should
form
one
family
and
deal
with
each
other
as
brothers
and
sisters.
...
Love
of
God
and
of
ones
neighbour,
then,
is
the
first
and
greatest
commandment.
The
International
Theological
Commissions
document
Communion
and
Stewardship
gives
a
similar
message
and
emphasizes
that
we
are
inherently
communitarian
as
we
are
created
in
the
image
of
God:
Human
beings
are
created
in
the
imago
Dei
precisely
as
persons
capable
of
a
knowledge
and
love
that
are
personal
and
interpersonal.
It
is
of
the
essence
of
the
imago
Dei
in
them
that
these
personal
beings
are
relational
and
social
beings,
embraced
in
a
human
family
whose
unity
is
at
once
realized
and
prefigured
in
the
Church.28
It is within this community that one grows in identity and character. It is within the interdependence with the society that we fully actualize our humanity, for through their dealings with others, through mutual service, and through fraternal and sororal dialogues, men and women develop all their talents and become able to rise to their destiny.30 It is also within the community that we exercise our responsibility and role towards the common good and the upholding of human dignity. The communitarian character of human
28 29
12 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
existence
means
that
the
good
of
each
person
is
bound
up
with
the
good
of
the
community.31
We
are
challenged
to
uphold
the
fundamental
rights
given
to
all
humans,
to
ensure
that
everyone
is
afforded
the
opportunity
to
live
in
full
human
dignity,
and
to
bring
order
to
the
society
that
has
the
common
good
of
all
people
as
the
binding
principle.
Within
this
context,
we
are
also
brought
to
light
as
to
how
the
deviation
from
this
call
towards
community
would
lead
one
to
sin.
without
doubt
frequent
upheavals
in
the
social
order
are
in
part
the
results
of
economic,
political
and
social
tensions.
But
at
a
deeper
level
they
come
from
selfishness
and
pride,
two
things
which
contaminate
the
atmosphere
of
society
as
well.
As
it
is,
human
beings
are
prone
to
evil,
but
whenever
they
are
confronted
with
an
environment
where
the
effects
of
sin
are
to
be
found,
they
are
exposed
to
further
inducements
to
sin,
which
can
be
overcome
only
by
unremitting
effort
with
the
help
of
grace.32
Thus, we are challenged constantly to remember our primal role within the community, and in doing so, exercise our respect for the human person, respect and love for enemy, to live in human solidarity with responsibility and participation, and ultimately to uphold the common good.
Judith A. Dwyer, ed. The New Dictionary of Catholic Social Thought, (Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press, 1994), 192. 32 Ibid.
13 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
community and the society, and it is in exercising our role for the common good within the society that we fulfil our basic responsibility. The basic call here is awareness. We need to be aware that we are part of a whole. Especially in terms of exercising our faith, we need to be reminded constantly that we cannot live the Christian faith in exclusion. Our faith is not a private, out-of-the-world belief, it is in fact a grounded, relational faith that challenges us to a response within the reality we are in. Humans were created by God not for life in isolation but for the formation of social unity.33 Nurturing the Faith within the Community The awareness that our faith is meant to be grounded within the community and the society naturally leads to the conclusion that our spiritual growth needs to happen within the reality of the society. What this implies is that what we believe in and the subsequent growth of our relationship with God needs to be contextualized within the reality we are living in. We are challenged to experience and interpret the Gospel message within our society. We need to look out for the good Samaritan in our surroundings, to find them within the poor and the rich, within the Malays, Chinese, Indian and Eurasians in Malaysia. We need to exercise the beatitudes within the context of our usual lives, to live out the call of Christians within our economical, racial and religious tensions. We also need to understand the chaos of our times as the way Jesus view his Greco-Roman political-religious issues, to experience the Kingdom of God as Jesus has preached it within our daily reality, we need to see the face of Jesus within the fights and arguments of the politicians, religious and ordinary people in Malaysia alike. Our faith has to come alive within the interpersonal-communitarian present actuality of our society. Only through this strong grounding of the faith to the community, can our spirituality or relationship with our God grow steadily with a deeply rooted base and foundation. Communion within the Faith Community It should be clear by now that our Christian faith cannot be nurtured within a void or in total seclusion. Core to the faith is a relationship. This relationship, tending towards God, ultimately has to be actualized in us tending towards others. The first step forward upon this realization would naturally be to come into solidarity with our brothers and sisters sharing the same faith. For this communion with our faith
33
14 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
community
(the
church)
is
seen
as
kind
of
sacrament
or
sign
of
intimate
union
with
God,
and
of
the
unity
of
all
humankind.34
As
we
come
together
and
identify
ourselves
as
an
integral
part
of
a
community
of
communion,
we
are
then
able
to
assume
our
prophetic
role
in
our
living
with
others.
We
come
as
a
unity
as
we
face
the
social
reality.
We
face
the
political
issues
and
racial
issues
not
as
individual
with
varying
concerns,
but
as
a
member
of
the
communion
of
God
striving
for
the
common
good.
This
call,
although
seemingly
obvious,
can
be
a
great
challenge
within
the
Malaysian
context.
For
due
to
the
reality
of
the
strong
racial-identity,
strong
segregation
is
found
even
within
the
faith
community
itself.
We
could
easily
observe
the
separation
between
the
Chinese,
English
and
Tamil
speaking
Catholic
communities
who
tend
to
stick
to
themselves
in
terms
of
worship
and
community
living.
The
language
and
cultural
barrier
increases
the
unease
for
intermingling
and
unified
liturgies
or
activities.
This
then
pose
as
the
first
challenge
for
us
in
exercising
the
call
for
communion.
Awareness
was
called
for
previously
for
us
to
understand
our
situation
with
open
arms,
but
it
is
within
this
aspect
that
we
can
most
tangibly
affect
and
begin
change.
It
is
only
through
such
acceptance,
openness
and
willingness
to
go
beyond
our
discomfort
and
attempt
for
communion
with
our
brothers
and
sisters
within
our
own
faith
community
can
we
move
forward
toward
the
greater
goal
of
human
community.
It
is
not
an
easy
task,
but
it
is
exactly
the
Christian
challenge.
Within
such
mindset
and
orientation,
our
objective
and
vision
would
then
be
a
unified
one.
Our
concerns
stem
from
our
relatedness
to
our
community.
We
move
from
individualism
towards
communal
charity,
and
we
get
to
truly
live
out
the
call
of
God
towards
all
Christian,
the
call
for
all
men
and
women
to
the
freedom
and
divine
fullness
of
life
in
this
Kingdom
by
entering
into
free,
forgiving
and
loving
relationships
in
human
community.35
Communion
with
the
whole
Society
Beyond
the
communion
with
the
members
of
the
church,
we
are
challenged
to
a
greater
realization
that
the
call
towards
Human
Community
goes
past
those
of
our
same
faith.
It
needs
to
be
extended
to
all
members
of
the
society.
We
need
to
look
at
the
bigger
context
of
the
country,
and
ultimately
establish
the
communion
with
all
other
citizens
of
the
country.
It
is
within
this
communion
that
we
are
most
challenged
in
exercising
our
Christian
values.
As
Paul
34 35
Lumen Gentium, 1. Brendan J. Kelly, The Individual in Community (Lectures, SATMI, Davao, 2010), 31.
15 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
puts
it
in
his
letters
to
the
various
communities
in
the
New
Testament,
we
are
encouraged
to
be
responsible
members
of
society,
concerned
both
for
the
well-being
of
our
own
community
and
for
what
was
in
the
wider
public
interest.36
The
acceptance
of
this
reality
of
Human
Community
and
responding
to
it
is
by
far
the
greatest
call
for
us
within
the
Malaysian
context.
We
need
to
be
aware
that
within
the
struggle
of
social
equality,
within
the
racial
disputes
and
most
of
all,
within
our
religious
tensions
and
conflicts,
we
are
ultimately
one.
As
in
the
words
of
Johannes
B.
Metz:
As
Christians,
we
must
ever
more
and
more
take
to
ourselves
in
the
re-enactment
of
the
descensus
Christi
those
elements
of
the
world
which
are
not
yet
assimilated
into
our
faith,
for
it
is
from
the
world
and
for
the
world
that
we
live,
this
is
precisely
how
we
set
the
world
free
in
faith,
how
we
leave
to
it
its
own
worldly
character.37
What
this
understanding
calls
for
is
a
shift
in
paradigm.
When
we
see
those
who
are
different
from
us
as
part
of
our
community,
we
will
learn
to
see
things
from
their
lens,
thus
it
allows
us
to
withhold
judgements
and
biases
for
the
time
being
while
reflecting
for
solutions
which
serve
for
the
betterment
of
all.
It
prevents
us
from
looking
at
things
as
we
finding
ways
to
disarm
or
gain
victory
over
the
other.
Rather,
it
is
all
of
us
coming
to
a
solution
that
benefits
all.
In
other
words,
this
understanding
of
solidarity
helps
us
better
in
achieving
the
common
good.
As
our
late
Pope
John
Paul
II
often
emphasized
in
his
social
teachings,
such
solidarity
has
an
important
place
in
the
vision
of
a
just
society
in
Catholic
social
ethics,
and
it
is
a
prerequisite
for
a
democratic
society
characterized
by
human
rights.38
Of
course,
this
understanding
takes
on
a
new
level
of
complexity
as
those
whom
we
see
as
one
of
us
might
not
necessarily
think
the
same.
The
call
towards
the
common
good
might
not
draw
a
unison
response
as
people
with
different
background
and
mindset
tend
to
look
at
things
differently.
What
is
key
here
is
for
us
who
understand
this
framework
to
hold
strong
to
this
conviction
and
understanding.
We
are
called
to
make
the
world
more
worldly,
to
bring
it
into
its
own,
to
preserve
the
barely
suggested,
barely
dreamed-of
heights
and
depths
of
its
own
worldly
nature
which
have
been
made
possible
by
grace,
but
have
been
hidden
and
obstructed
by
sin.39
Amidst
the
difficulty
and
struggle,
we
need
to
stand
out
and
answer
to
this
call
for
the
following
last
challenge,
to
be
prophetic
agents
of
hope
and
change.
36
Victor Furnish, Uncommon Love and the Common Good: Christians as Citizens in the Letters of Paul, in In Search of the Common Good, Patrick Miller and Dennis McCaan ed. (New York: T & T Clark, 2005), 58. 37 Metz refers more to the Christian role within a secularized world, however, the call could be similarly appropriated here. Johannes B. Metz, A Believers Look at the World in The Christian and the World: Readings in Theology, (New York, P.J.Kenedy & Sons, 1965), 88. 38 David Hollenbach, The Global Common Good in a divided World (Presentation, The Australian Catholic University and Uniya Jesuit Social Justice Centre, 2005), 4. 39 Johannes B. Metz, A Believers Look at the World in The Christian and the World: Readings in Theology, (New York, P.J.Kenedy & Sons, 1965), 93.
16 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
The Call to be Prophetic Agents of Hope and Change The understanding of the true meaning of Human Community and the appropriation of it into our society ultimately entails us doing the right thing. It is the call for us to go beyond the currents of social inclination, and most of the time, to execute bold actions and prophetic proclamations. We are tasked to be the level minded ones amidst the chaos, to always work towards the common good. The outcome of this should always be constructive, sensitive to all, and ultimately yield good fruits. We are also called to be agents of hope. Amidst gloom and despair, we should be the voice that brings comfort and solace to all. The words we speak should always strengthen our inter-relatedness, bringing us closer together. Some of the recent happenings in Malaysia, especially on the treatment towards religious tension, have in fact demonstrated that many Catholics indeed embraced the essence of the Human Community understanding, and have acted towards achieving the common good. While the local and foreign media were hyped on the tensions between the Christians and Muslim over the Allah feud, the Catholics remained calm and level-headed throughout. They were non-reactive to the various attacks, understanding the undercurrents of the situation and allowing the reactive energy to die down. What came after were signs of greater solidarity within the faith community and a solid witnessing towards people of other faith, resulting in many more-understanding non-Christians to voice their support and offer their aid. The tragic religious tension Malaysia is facing now can in effect be a moment of grace for Catholics to truly testify to the faith. To show to others the concept of human community in our all embracing love and strive for the good of all. This is the golden opportunity where we can bring hope although things do not seem too bright. This is the time where we could stand out as true prophets, bringing everyone to greater solidarity through our action and witness. If this seed is planted, nurtured and cared for well, it would grow into a great big tree of testimony of our Christian understanding of Human Community, thus, ultimately, it could influence many future tides of the country beyond the religious aspect into the political, racial, social and economical sphere.
17
|
P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Conclusion
The
birth
and
growth
of
the
country
Malaysia
has
been
a
very
unique
one.
Despite
the
diversity,
there
has
always
been
a
strong
effort
in
unifying
the
people.
However,
due
to
the
reality
of
the
racial,
economical,
political
and
religious
differences
and
disparity,
the
unifying
efforts
have
been
extremely
challenging.
Up
to
now,
Malaysians
are
still
trying
to
find
its
identity,
to
try
to
come
to
terms
with
what
it
truly
means
to
call
oneself
a
Malaysian.
Catholics
within
the
country
need
to
also
play
its
role
in
searching
for
their
identity
within
the
country.
Besides
a
sociological
understanding
towards
the
situations,
we
have
an
added
faith
dimension
to
be
utilized
in
analyzing
and
coming
to
awareness
of
the
social
reality.
Appropriating
the
theological
anthropological
framework
of
human
community,
Catholics
should
come
to
understand
that
they
play
an
integral
role
within
the
community
and
need
to
strive
towards
the
full
communion.
We
are
challenged
to
be
fully
aware
of
the
society
,
to
know
that
our
faith
have
to
be
actualized
within
this
society,
that
we
need
to
firstly
be
in
communion
with
our
faith
community,
and
more
importantly,
we
need
to
be
in
communion
with
the
whole
nation.
As
Victor
Furnish
puts
it
while
summarizing
the
call
of
Paul
on
the
various
communities
towards
their
responsibility
as
members
of
society,
He
called
them
to
recognize
that
this
had
to
involve
their
ongoing
critical
assessment
of
societys
manifold
and
competing
claims
concerning
good
and
evil,
right
and
wrong.
And
he
led
them
to
understand
that
what
they
could
determine
to
be
the
will
of
God
as
normed
by
the
uncommon,
saving
love
disclosed
in
the
cross
ought
to
govern
their
conduct
in
relation
to
society
at
large
no
less
than
their
conduct
within
the
believing
community.40
In thoughts and actions, the Catholics have to play the prophetic role in establishing this communion and be an integral bonding force for all. Ultimately, this identity of the Catholic should influence and permeate into the national identity, making the nation understand that we are all part of a diverse, unique but most importantly, strongly bonded communion.
40
Victor Furnish, Uncommon Love and the Common Good: Christians as Citizens in the Letters of Paul, in In Search of the Common Good, Patrick Miller and Dennis McCaan ed. (New York: T & T Clark, 2005), 87.
18 | P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
BIBLIOGRAPHY:
___.
Culture
of
Malaysia-
History
and
Ethnic
Relations,
Urbanism,
Architechture
and
the
Use
of
Space.
Everyculture.
http://www.everyculture.com/Ja-Ma/Malaysia.html
(accessed
20
December,
2009).
.
Freedom
of
Religion
in
Malaysia.
Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_of_religious_freedom_in_Malaysia
(accessed
10
Jan
,
2010).
.
I
Am
Malaysian.
http://malaysianpolitics.wordpress.com/
(accessed
8
December,
2009).
.
Lina
Joy.
Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lina_Joy
(accessed
10
Jan,
2010).
.
MALAYSIA
Christian
Youths
Accused
of
Trying
to
Convert
Muslims
.
Union
of
Catholic
Asian
News.
15
July,
2009.
.
Malaysia-
Education
System.
BookRags.
http://www.bookrags.com/research/malaysiaeducation-system-ema-04/
(accessed
8
December,
2009).
.
Malaysiakini.
Wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysiakini
(accessed
9
December,
2009).
.
Malaysian
Allah
Dispute'
Under
Control
Despite
Vandalism.
Catholic
News
Agency.
February,
2010.
http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/malaysian_allah_dispute_under_control_d espite_vandalism
(accessed
9
February,
2010).
.
Pig
Heads
Left
at
Malaysia
Mosques
after
Allah
Row.
BBC
News.
27
January,
2010.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8435975.stm
(accessed
9
February,
2010).
15Malaysia.
http://15malaysia.com
(accessed
1
December,
2009).
A,
Samsul.
Debating
about
Identity
in
Malaysia:
A
Discourse
Analysis.
Southeast
Asian
Studies
34,
no.
3
(December
1996):
476-499.
Brant,
Robin.
Malaysia's
Lingering
Ethnic
Divide.
BBC
News,
Malaysia.
4
March,
2008.
Dwyer,
Judith
A,
ed.
The
New
Dictionary
of
Catholic
Social
Thought.
Collegeville,
Minnesota:
The
Liturgical
Press,
1994.
Furnish,
Victor
Paul.
Uncommon
Love
and
the
Common
Good:
Christians
as
Citizens
in
the
Letters
of
Paul.
In
In
Search
of
the
Common
Good,
edited
by
Patrick
D
Miller
and
Dennis
P
McCann.
New
York:
T
&
T
Clark,
2005.
19
|
P a g e
Theological Anthropology
TERENCE WEE
Gaspar, Carlito M. Harbemas' Theory of Communicative Action. Phillipine Studies 47 (1999): 407-425. Gooch, Liz. Under Cloud of Violence, Malaysian Christians Come Together. The New York Times. 10 January, 2010. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/18/world/asia/18iht- church.html (accessed 9 February, 2010). Hollenbach, David. The Global Common Good in a Divided World. 22 August, 2005. Ibrahim, Zainah. What Islam, Whose Islam?: Sisters in Islam and the Struggle for Womens Rights in The Politics of Multiculturalism. Edited by R W Hefner. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2001. Joseph, Ralina. Suart Hall. Lecture notes: Beyond the Binaries. 1 Jan , 2008. Kelly, Brendan J. Individual in Community. SATMI, Davao, 2010. Lee, Su Kim. Exploring the Relationship between Language, Culture and Identity. GEMA online Journal of Language Studies 3, no. 2 (2003): 1-13. Merchant, Preston. Malaysia's Indian Struggle for Minority Rights. Saja Forum. 4 February, 2008. Metz, Johannes B. A Believer's Look at The World. In The Christian and the World: Readings in Theology, 68-100. New York: P.J. Kenedy & Sons, 1965. Pilario, Daniel franklin. Mapping Postcolonial Theory: Appropriations in Contemporary Theology. Hapag 3, no. 1-2 (2006): 9-51. Spencer, Robert. Malaysia: Even more Churches Firebombed over Use of Word 'Allah'. Catholic Online. 10 January, 2010. http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=35163 (accessed 9 February, 2010). Tay, Tian Yan. The Clear and Present Danger. Sin Chew Daily. 21 October, 2009. Wen, Cui. [The Spirit of Chinese Education Promotion within Malaysian Chinese Society ]. Guang Hua Daily. 13 September, 2001. Wong, James Wing-On. Anwar Reiterates Call for Abolition of NEP. Clare Street Blog. 4 July, 2006. http://jameswongwingon-online.blogspot.com/2006/07/anwar-reiterates-call-for- neps.html (accessed 8 December, 2009). Yeoh, Chirstopher Rodney. Malaysia, truly Asia? Religious Pluralism in Malaysia. The Pluralism Project. pluralism.org/research/reports/yeoh/Pluralism_Malaysia.doc (accessed 30 Jan, 2010). 20 | P a g e