20

40
60
80
100
120
More

Frequency
0
5
26
30
7
0
0

Histogram
Frequency

Bin

40
30
20
10
0

Frequency
20

40

60

80
Bin

100

120 More

Frequency

30
37.5
45
52.5
60
67.5
75
82.5
More

Frequency
1
2
9
7
12
10
16
4
7

Histogram
Frequency

Bin

20
15
10
5
0

Frequency

Bin

Frequency

Exhibit 1
t-Test FOR COMPARISION OF MEANS OF VIVEK AND PRASHANT : Paired Two Sample for Means
vivek
Mean
54.94117647
Variance
309.2203687
Observations
68
Pearson Correlation
0.030553483
Hypothesized Mean Difference
0
df
67
t Stat
4.787880263
P(T<=t) one-tail
4.84111E-06
t Critical one-tail
1.667916114
P(T<=t) two-tail
9.68223E-06
t Critical two-tail
1.996008354
null hypothesis
Ho: vivek=prashant

prashant
41.85294118
214.6646181
68

alternate hypothesis
Ha: vivekprashant

as t stats is greater than the t critical one tail value, the null hypothesis can be rejected in favour of alternate hypothesis
conclusion :
population means of Vivek and Prashant are not equal

f alternate hypothesis

vivek
vivek
prashant

1
0.245471

prashant
1

testing of the significance of population correlation coefficient

Ho: =0
Ha: 0
where is the population correlation
To test its significance, we need to calculate t-statistic for
=0.05 (assumed) and compare with t /2, at df= 67 which is equal to 1.996

r (population Corelation coefficient )=0.245471

t=r(sqrt((n-2)/(1-r^2)
2.057153
as t value for population corelation (2.05) is more than the critical t value at (=0.05) the null hypothesis (1.996)
the Ho can be rejected in favour of Ha.
conclusion: there is positive corelation in between the time spend by vivek and prashant on social networking site

ull hypothesis (1.996)

n social networking site

Exhibit 2
Anova: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
vivek
prashant
karan

Count
68
68
68

ANOVA
Source of Variation
Between Groups
Within Groups

SS
15413.69
49474.06

Total

64887.75

H0:vivek=prashant=karan

Sum
3736
2846
4280

df

Average
54.94118
41.85294
62.94118

Variance
309.2203687
214.6646181
214.5338016

MS
2 7706.843
201 246.1396

F
31.31086285

P-value
1.4541E-12

203
Ha: any two or all three means are not equal

as the F value (31.31) is more than the F-cirtical (3.0408) Ho is rjected in favour of null hypothesis
conclusion : all three means or any two meas are not equal.

F crit
3.040828049

hypothesis

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Exhibit 3
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.030553483
R Square
0.000933515
Adjusted R Square -0.014203856
Standard Error
17.70910755
Observations
68
ANOVA
df
Regression
Residual
Total

1
66
67

Coefficients
Intercept
53.40641628
prashant
0.036670307
correlation equation
vivek= 53.40+0.0366prashant

SS
MS
19.34035117 19.34035
20698.42435 313.6125
20717.76471

F
0.06167

Standard Error
t Stat
P-value
6.542725656 8.162717 1.35E-11
0.1476655 0.248334 0.804647

Significance F
0.804647365

Lower 95%
Upper 95%
40.34344303 66.46939
-0.258153376 0.331494

here, we have taken Ho= there is no significant corelation between time spend on social networking
by vivek and prashant. And Ha as there is corelation between the spend time by them
as F model is less than the significance F value, hence we cann't reject the null hypothesis.
conclusion: the correlation equation obtained is not very significant.

Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
40.34344 66.46939
-0.25815 0.331494

SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R
0.037801
R Square
0.001429
Adjusted R Square
-0.0293
Standard Error
17.84039
Observations
68
ANOVA
df
Regression
Residual
Total

Intercept
prashant
karan

SS
MS
F
Significance F
2 29.60394 14.80197 0.046506 0.95459
65 20688.16 318.2794
67 20717.76

Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat
P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
51.95454 10.43132 4.980632 4.95E-06 31.12177 72.78732 31.12177 72.78732
0.029906 0.153455 0.194884 0.846092 -0.27657 0.336377 -0.27657 0.336377
0.027565 0.153502 0.179575 0.858045
-0.279 0.33413
-0.279 0.33413

mutiple regression equation = 51.95+0.0299prashant+0.02756karan

Here,Ho= regression equation is not significant : Ha= the regression model is significant
however, as the F model value is less than the F significance, hence Ho cannot be rejected.
conclusion:the regression equation is not very significant.

Upper 95.0%

date
7/1/2011
7/2/2011
7/3/2011
7/4/2011
7/5/2011
7/6/2011
7/7/2011
7/8/2011
7/9/2011
7/10/2011
7/11/2011
7/12/2011
7/13/2011
7/14/2011
7/15/2011
7/16/2011
7/17/2011
7/18/2011
7/19/2011
7/20/2011
7/21/2011
7/22/2011
7/23/2011
7/24/2011
7/25/2011
7/26/2011
7/27/2011
7/28/2011
7/29/2011
7/30/2011
7/31/2011
8/1/2011
8/2/2011
8/3/2011
8/4/2011
8/5/2011
8/6/2011
8/7/2011
8/8/2011
8/9/2011
8/10/2011
8/11/2011
8/12/2011
8/13/2011
8/14/2011

day
vivek
prashant karan
Friday
60
30
Saturday
50
35
Sunday
120
40
Monday
30
65
Tuesday
50
45
Wednesday
34
35
Thursday
80
55
Friday
40
35
Saturday
56
30
Sunday
56
50
Monday
55
40
Tuesday
60
50
Wednesday
50
30
Thursday
45
45
Friday
40
55
Saturday
50
45
Sunday
65
35
Monday
50
75
Tuesday
70
75
Wednesday
45
75
Thursday
30
45
Friday
50
55
Saturday
60
75
Sunday
45
45
Monday
30
35
Tuesday
70
36
Wednesday
50
35
Thursday
70
55
Friday
80
75
Saturday
80
45
Sunday
60
35
Monday
70
30
Tuesday
50
35
Wednesday
55
45
Thursday
60
35
Friday
45
35
Saturday
30
35
Sunday
50
45
Monday
45
25
Tuesday
35
20
Wednesday
50
20
Thursday
60
20
Friday
70
25
Saturday
60
10
Sunday
60
25

70
65
60
65
55
45
35
65
65
50
50
50
45
50
80
65
65
90
75
70
76
70
75
65
50
70
60
70
90
85
65
45
35
45
30
40
55
55
40
90
65
60
50
60
80

8/15/2011
8/16/2011
8/17/2011
8/18/2011
8/19/2011
8/20/2011
8/21/2011
8/22/2011
8/23/2011
8/24/2011
8/25/2011
8/26/2011
8/27/2011
8/28/2011
8/29/2011
8/30/2011
8/31/2011
9/1/2011
9/2/2011
9/3/2011
9/4/2011
9/5/2011
9/6/2011

Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday

50
45
120
90
80
50
55
45
35
45
50
50
55
45
40
50
55
45
25
45
55
65
70

25
35
35
35
45
35
35
45
45
55
5
45
45
50
45
50
55
45
35
60
35
45
55

70
75
60
85
75
60
45
45
60
50
69
70
80
90
85
75
75
55
65
75
70
60
45

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
More

Frequency
0
2
3
8
21
20
8
1
5
0
0
0
0

Histogram
25
20
Frequency

Bin

15
10
5
0

Bin

Frequency

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
More

Frequency
0
0
0
5
6
26
16
8
4
1
0
0
2

Histogram
Frequency

Bin

30
25
20
15
10
5
0

Bin

Frequency

Exhibit 6 - Spearman's test for correlation

vivek
60
50
120
30
50
34
80
40
56
56
55
60
50
45
40
50
65
50
70
45
30
50
60
45
30
70
50
70
80
80
60
70
50
55
60
45
30
50
45
35
50
60
70

prashant
30
35
40
65
45
35
55
35
30
50
40
50
30
45
55
45
35
75
75
75
45
55
75
45
35
36
35
55
75
45
35
30
35
45
35
35
35
45
25
20
20
20
25

Rv
Rp
d=Rv-Rp d^2
rank VIV Rank prashant
diff
16
56
-40
1600
32
38
-6
36
1
35
-34
1156
64
6
58
3364
32
19
13
169
63
38
25
625
4
8
-4
16
58
38
20
400
24
56
-32
1024
24
15
9
81
26
35
-9
81
16
15
1
1
32
56
-24
576
47
19
28
784
58
8
50
2500
32
19
13
169
14
38
-24
576
32
1
31
961
8
1
7
49
47
1
46
2116
64
19
45
2025
32
8
24
576
16
1
15
225
47
19
28
784
64
38
26
676
8
37
-29
841
32
38
-6
36
8
8
0
0
4
1
3
9
4
19
-15
225
16
38
-22
484
8
56
-48
2304
32
38
-6
36
26
19
7
49
16
38
-22
484
47
38
9
81
64
38
26
676
32
19
13
169
47
60
-13
169
61
64
-3
9
32
64
-32
1024
16
64
-48
2304
8
60
-52
2704

60
60
50
45
120
90
80
50
55
45
35
45
50
50
55
45
40
50
55
45
25
45
55
65
70

10
25
25
35
35
35
45
35
35
45
45
55
5
45
45
50
45
50
55
45
35
60
35
45
55

16
16
32
47
1
3
4
32
26
47
61
47
32
32
26
47
58
32
26
47
68
47
26
14
8

67
60
60
38
38
38
19
38
38
19
19
8
68
19
19
15
19
15
8
19
38
7
38
19
8

-51
-44
-28
9
-37
-35
-15
-6
-12
28
42
39
-36
13
7
32
39
17
18
28
30
40
-12
-5
0

sum

2601
1936
784
81
1369
1225
225
36
144
784
1764
1521
1296
169
49
1024
1521
289
324
784
900
1600
144
25
0
52769

Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient formula.

Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient formula.

-0.00716
As the coefficeient is negative ,there is a negative correlation between the two time pattern,
however as the correlation coefficient is close to 0 hence it is not very significant.

Exhibit 7 : Wilcoxian Signed-Rank Test

vivek
60
50
120
30
50
34
80
40
56
56
55
60
50
45
40
50
65
50
70
45
30
50
60
45
30
70
50
70
80
80
60
70
50
55
60
45
30
50
45
35
50
60
70
60
60
50
45
120
90
80
50
55
45
35
45
50

rank with
prashant vivek-prashant value of vivek-prashant
rank
rank with sign
"+ve" sign
30
30
30
14
14
35
15
15
29
29
40
80
80
2
2
65
-35
35
9
-9
45
5
5
50
50
35
-1
1
62
-62
55
25
25
19
19
35
5
5
50
50
30
26
26
18
18
50
6
6
49
49
40
15
15
29
29
50
10
10
41
41
30
20
20
24
24
45
0
0
63
-63
55
-15
15
29
-29
45
5
5
50
50
35
30
30
14
14
75
-25
25
19
-19
75
-5
5
50
-50
75
-30
30
14
-14
45
-15
15
29
-29
55
-5
5
50
-50
75
-15
15
29
-29
45
0
0
63
-63
35
-5
5
50
-50
36
34
34
13
13
35
15
15
29
29
55
15
15
29
29
75
5
5
50
50
45
35
35
9
9
35
25
25
19
19
30
40
40
7
7
35
15
15
29
29
45
10
10
41
41
35
25
25
19
19
35
10
10
41
41
35
-5
5
50
-50
45
5
5
50
50
25
20
20
24
24
20
15
15
29
29
20
30
30
14
14
20
40
40
7
7
25
45
45
5
5
10
50
50
4
4
25
35
35
9
9
25
25
25
19
19
35
10
10
41
41
35
85
85
1
1
35
55
55
3
3
45
35
35
9
9
35
15
15
29
29
35
20
20
24
24
45
0
0
63
-63
45
-10
10
41
-41
55
-10
10
41
-41
5
45
45
5
5

14
29
2
0
50
0
19
50
18
49
29
41
24
0
0
50
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
29
29
50
9
19
7
29
41
19
41
0
50
24
29
14
7
5
4
9
19
41
1
3
9
29
24
0
0
0
5

rank with
"-v" sign
0
0
0
-9
0
-62
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-63
-29
0
0
-19
-50
-14
-29
-50
-29
-63
-50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-63
-41
-41
0

50
55
45
40
50
55
45
25
45
55
65
70

45
45
50
45
50
55
45
35
60
35
45
55

5
10
-5
-5
0
0
0
-10
-15
20
20
15

5
10
5
5
0
0
0
10
15
20
20
15

50
41
50
50
63
63
63
41
29
24
24
29

50
41
-50
-50
-63
-63
-63
-41
-29
24
24
29
95

50
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
24
29
1116

0
0
-50
-50
-63
-63
-63
-41
-29
0
0
0
-1021

so, sum of ranks=w=95

since the sample size is greater than the 30 so distribution of test
statistic can be approximated to normal distribution.
the Mean of the Normal Distribution curve used to estimate the distribution of Test Statistic W (

W) is determined by the Null Hypothesis.

The Null Hypothesis states that there is no difference between the time spend by vivek and prashant.
so the mean for the approximated norml distribution graph=

W = 0
now,variance of normal distribution curve=

= SQRT [ ( n * (n+1) * (2n + 1) ) / 6 ]

w =
Z score=

327.3133056
(W--.5)/
0.288714203

at =0.05 we have Z table =1.96 and as the Z score for w is less than the Z tab so null hypothesis can not be rejected

vivek bin
Bin
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
More

prashant bin
Frequency
0
0
0
5
6
26
16
8
4
1
0
0
2

More

Frequency
0
2
3
8
21
20
8
1
5
0
0
0
0

e(f)

0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110

e(f)
0
5
6
26
16
8
4
1
2
68

chi cal
chi tab

Bin

1
4
7
23.5
18
8
2.5
3
1

0.745285
1

2
3
8
21
20
8
1
5
0
68

1
4
7
23.5
18
8
2.5
3
1

0.745285

2
8
14
47
36
16
5
6
2
136