Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Mathematical induction is a method of mathematical proof typically used to establish that a given statement is true of all natural numbers (positive integers). It is done by proving that the first statement in the infinite sequence of statements is true, and then proving that if any one statement in the infinite sequence of statements is true, then so is the next one. The method can be extended to prove statements about more general well-founded structures, such as trees; this generalization, known as structural induction.
E x a m p l es
P r o b l e m 1: Use m a t h e ma t i ca l i n d uc t i o n to p ro ve t h a t 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n = n ( n + 1 ) / 2 fo r a l l posi t i v e i n t ege rs n. Sol u t i o n t o P r o b l e m 1:
Bo t h sides of t h e sta te me n t a re equa l hence p (1) is t r u e . STEP 2: We now assume t h a t p (k) i s t r u e 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k = k ( k + 1) / 2
1
and show t h a t p ( k + 1) is t r u e by add i n g k + 1 to bot h si des of t h e above sta te me n t 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + k + (k + 1) = k ( k + 1) / 2 + (k + 1) = ( k + 1)( k / 2 + 1) = ( k + 1)( k + 2) / 2
P r o b l e m 2: P rove t h a t 1
2
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + n
= n ( n + 1 ) (2 n + 1)/ 6
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + n
= n (n + 1) (2n + 1)/ 2
= 1
R ig h t Si de = 1 (1 + 1) (2 * 1 + 1)/ 6 = 1
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + k
= k ( k + 1) (2 k + 1)/ 6
to bo t h sides of
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + k
+ (k + 1)
= k ( k + 1) (2 k + 1)/ 6 + (k + 1)
E x p a n d k (2 k + 1)+ 6 ( k + 1) = ( k + 1) [ 2 k
2
+ 7 k + 6 ] /6
2
No w fac to r 2 k
+ 7 k + 6.
= ( k + 1) [ ( k + 2) (2 k + 3) ] /6
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + k
+ (k + 1)
= (k + 1) [ (k + 2) (2 k + 3) ] /6
P r o b l e m 3: Use m a t h e ma t i ca l i n d uc t i o n to p ro ve t h a t 1
3
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + n
= n
( n + 1)
/ 4
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + n
= n
(n + 1)
/ 4
= 1
2
R ig h t Si de = 1
(1 + 1)
/ 4 = 1
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + k
= k
(k + 1)
/ 4
add (k + 1) 1
3
to bo t h sides + ... + k
2 3
+ 2
+ 3
+ (k + 1)
= k
(k + 1)
/ 4 + ( k + 1)
fac to r (k + 1) = ( k + 1)
2
on t he r i g h t side / 4 + (k + 1) ]
[ k
[ k
+ 4 k + 4 ] / 4
2
[ ( k + 2)
] / 4
+ 2
+ 3
+ ... + k
+ (k + 1)
= (k + 1)
[ (k + 2)
] / 4
+ 2 n is d i v i s i b l e by 3
+ 2 n is d i v i s i b l e by 3
+ 2(1) = 3
3 is d i v i s i b l e by 3
+ 2 k i s d i v i s i b l e by 3
is equ i va le n t to k
+ 2 k = 3 M , w he re M is a posi t i ve i n t e ge r.
3
+ 2 ( k + 1);
+ 2 ( k + 1) = k
2
+ 3 k
+ 5 k + 3
+ 2 k ] + [3 k
2
+ 3 k + 3]
2
= 3 M + 3 [ k
+ k + 1 ] = 3 [ M + k
+ k + 1 ]
P r o b l e m 5: P rove t h a t 3
n
> n
n
fo r n = 1, n = 2 and use t he ma t h e m a t i ca l i n d uc t i o n
2
to p rove t h a t 3
> n
fo r n a posi t i ve i n t e ge r g rea te r t h a n 2.
Sol u t i o n t o P r o b l e m 5:
> n
= 3 = 1
= 9 = 4
> k
> 3 * k
T he le f t si de is equa l to 3 k
2
k + 1
. Fo r k >, 2, we can w r i t e
> 2 k a nd k
> 1
We now comb i ne t h e above i neq u a l i t i e s by add i n g t he lef t h a n d s ides and t h e r i g h t h a n d si des of t h e t w o i neq u a l i t i e s 2 k
2
> 2 k + 1
> k
+ 2 k + 1
Fac to r t h e r i g h t si de we can w r i t e 3 * k
2
> ( k + 1)
k
If 3 * 3 3 * 3
k
> 3 * k
2
and 3 * k
> ( k + 1)
2 then
> ( k + 1)
Rew r i t e t h e le f t side as 3 3
k + 1
k + 1
> ( k + 1)
W h ic h p ro ves t h a P(k + 1) is t r u e
P r o b l e m 6: P rove t h a t n ! > 2
n
= 16
(k + 1)
to ob ta i n
(k + 1) > 2 * 2
T he above i neq u a l i t y ma y be w r i t t e n 2
k
(k + 1) > 2
k + 1
(k + 1) a nd 2
(k + 1) > 2
k + 1
we