Table 1: Milestones to evaluate Sub-project Implementation (Level 1)

Milestones 1. Updated & Modernize programs Reference to Specific Objectives 1 Critical Activities Committee reports; review of national and international experience; use of engineering faculty guidelines Committee reports Terms of reference; administrative process; process monitoring to assure quality Administrative process; terms of reference; procurement of machineries; monitoring to assure standard Terms of reference; procurement Terms of reference; selection of academic staff and foreign institutions based on terms of reference; administrative process; insertion in the program Terms of reference; procurement; web site online Terms of reference; Administrative process; selection of students based on terms of reference; insertion in the program Verification Methods Transcripts and reports, official approval Assumptions Proactive academic participation from all faculty member Proactive academic participation Effective administrative support from R.U. Effective support from R. U. Effective administrative support from R.U Demand exists

2. 3.

Guidebooks created or updated Renovation physical space Setting up IT related Workshop Purchased equipment Academic staff development

1 2

Official approval Official approval Procurement records and non-objections Transcripts and records Official approval procurement records; and nonobjection, transcripts and records Procurement records and non-objections Transcripts and records Non-objection transcript and records, feedback records

4.

2,3,4,5

5.

2,3,5

6.

3,5

7.

Development of existing Eoffice system Development new short program

8.

Procurement records and Non-objection transcripts and records Official approval, onobjection transcript and records, feedback records

Use of up-todate technology Effective support from R. U.

Table 2: Performance Indicators to Evaluate Sub-project Impact (Level 2)

Calculation Base Value

Calculation Method

objectivesReference to specific

1.

Improve and optimize physical laboratory space

2,5

(Number of refurbished labs / number of initial labs ) X 100 Average satisfaction rate after surveys

On-time procurement processes, construction and reception

Official nonobjection records and contracts

2.

Improve academic quality perception of guidebooks and equipment

1,2, 3,5

Updated state-of the-art designs Efficient implementation

Reports, forms

3.

Increase student time dedicated to experimental teaching learning

2,3, 5

4.

Increase overall student satisfaction

1to 5

(Average seating per laboratory (workshop)/ initial average seating per laboratory) 100 Average satisfaction rateafter surveys

Completion of Lab./workshop upgrading and ready for use technical staff available

Transcripts, reports, records, updated inventory verification

Updated stateof-the-art designs, efficient implementation

Reports, forms

5.

Increase Undergraduate student for enhancement laboratory

yearly admission record

Availability of academic records

Paper and database records

Number of refurbished lab=2 Number of initial lab=7 Base value = (2/7) X100 =29% Number of total students surveyed =100 Number of total satisfied students from feedback surveyed form =75 Base value = (75/100)x100=7 5% Average seating per laboratory=20 Initial average seating per laboratory=30 Base value =( 20/30) x100 =67% Number of total students surveyed =100 Number of total satisfied students from feedback surveyed form = 65, Base value = (65/100) x100 =65% Number of total students admitted by admission test yearly=30

0%

100%

75%

90%

67%

100%

65%

90%

30

Desired Standard Year 2015 50

Verification Method

Baseline Value Year 2011

Indicators

Assumptions

facilities

6.

7.

Increase graduate student for enhancement laboratory facilities Increase the quality of existing E-office system

2,5

yearly admission record (Evaluate the number of new design component and measure security issue)/ (Expected system component and security measure ) x 100 (number of student get Passing certificate / Number of student admitted)X 100

Availability of academic records Updated state-of the-art designs & Efficient implementation

Paper and database records Transcripts, reports, records

Number of total eligible students admitted yearly =30 number of new design component and security issue =2 total number of expected system component and security measure= 10 Base value= (2/10)x100= 20%

30

50

3,5

20%

80%

8.

Development of operational ITliterate human resource

Availability of academic records

Transcripts, reports, records

Number of students admitted in the program=50 Number of students get certificate= 40 base value= (40/50)x100= 80%

80%