Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 7

OUTLINE FAMILY CODE TY VS. CA, 346 SCRA 86 (NOV. 27, 2000) I. CONCEPT OF MARRIAGE. ACEBEDO VS.

. ARQUERO, MARCH 11, 2003 II. ELEMENTS OF MARRIAGE. A. ESSENTIAL REQUISITES SEE ARTICLE 2. 1. LEGAL CAPACITY

REPUBLIC VS. CAGANDAHAN[G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008 SILVERIO VS. REPUBLIC, G.R. No. No. 174689, Oct. 22, 2007 GARCIA-RECIO VS. RECIO, G.R. NO. 138322, OCT. 2, 2001 2. CONSENT FREELY GIVEN.

B.) FORMAL REQUISITIES SEE ARTICLE 3. 1. AUTHORITY OF SOLEMNIZING OFFICER NAVARRO VS. JUDGE DOMAGTOY, A.M. NO. MTJ-96-1088, JULY 19, 1996 SEE SECS. 444 & 455, 1991 LOCAL GOVT. CODE. LAXAMANA VS. BALTAZAR, 92 PHIL. 32 2. MARRIAGE LICENSE. COSCA VS. PALAYPAYON, A.M. MTJ-92-721, SEPT. 30, 1994 SEVILLA VS. CARDENAS, G.R. NO. 167684, JULY 31, 2006 ALCANTARA VS. ALCANTARA, G.R. NO. 167746, AUGUST 28, 2007 EXCEPTIONS: MARRIAGES OF EXCEPTIONAL CHARACTER. SORIANO VS. FELIX, L-9005, JUNE 20, 1958 NIAL VS. BAYADOG, 328 SCRA 122 BORJA-MANZANO VS. JUDGE SANCHEZ, A.M. NO. MTJ-00-1329-MARCH 8, 2001 REPUBLIC vs. DAYOT, G.R. No. 175581, March 28, 2008 3.MARRIAGE CEREMONY3.a) MARRIAGE CONTRACT MARRIAGE LICENSE. LORIA VS, FELIX, 5 O.G. 8114 INTESTATE ESTATE OF DELGADO & RUSTIA, JAN. 6, 2006 3.b) MARRIAGE BY PROXY 3.c) ABSENCE OF 2 WITNESSES MARRIAGE, VALID 3.d) COMMON-LAW MARRIAGE = LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP EUGENIO VS.VELEZ, 185 SCRA REPUBLIC VS. ORBECIDO III, G.R. NO. 154380, OCT. 5, 2005 III. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS.

ILUSORIO VS. ILUSORIO-BILDNER, G.R. NOS. 139789 AND 139808, JULY 19, 2001 ARROYO VS. VASQUEZ DE ARROYO, 42 PHIL. 54 GOITIA VS. CAMPOS-RUEDA, 35 PHIL. 252 STUDY MARITAL RAPE, ARTICLE 266-A, RPC, AS AMENDED BY R. A. 8353. PELAYO VS. LAURON, 12 PHIL. 453 RELUCIO VS. MEJIA LOPEZ, G.R. NO. 138497, JAN. 16, 2002 JADER-MANALO VS. SPS. CAMAISA, G.R. NO. 147978, JAN. 23, 2002 AYALA INVESTMENT VS. CA, G.R. NO. 118305, FEB. 12, 1998 TENCHAVEZ VS. ESCANO, 15 SCRA 355. IV. PROPERTY RELATIONS: A. MARRIAGE SETTLEMENT = CONTRACT

READ ART. 127, CIVIL CODE. B. DONATIONS PROPTER NUPTIA.

MATABUENA VS. CERVANTES, 38 SCRA 284 CHING VS. GOYANKO, JR., G.R. NO. 165879, NOV. 10, 2006 C. PATRIMONIAL PROPERTY REGIME: 1.) 2.) ABSOLUTE COMMUNITYCONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP-

VILLANUEVA vs. CHIONG, G.R. No. 159889, June 5, 2008 JOAQUINO VS. REYES, ET AL., G.R. NO. 154645, JULY 13, 2004 FLORA, ET AL. VS. PRADO ET AL., G.R. NO. 156879, JAN. 20, 2004 ENTONINA VS. CA, 266 SCRA 627 FRANCISCO VS. EVANGELISTA, G.R. NO. 102330, NOV. 25, 1998 VILLEGAS VS. LINGAN, G.R. NO. 153839, JUNE 29, 2007 HOMEOWNERS SAVINGS BANK VS. MIGUELA DAILO, G.R. NO. 153802, MARCH 11, 2005 CARLOS VS. ABELARDO, G.R. NO. 146504, APRIL 9, 2002 VDA. DE RAMONES VS. AGBAYANI, SEPT. 30, 2005 PELAYO VS. PELAYO, JUNE 8, 2005 SPS. BAUTISTA VS. SILVA, G.R. NO. 157434, SEPT. 19, 2006 MAQUILAN VS. MAQUILAN, G.R. NO. 155409, JUNE 8, 2007 3.)_ABSOLUTE SEPARATION. 4.) CO-OWNERSHIP UNDER ARTS. 147 AND 148. FRANCISCO VS. MASTER IRON WORKS, G.R. NO. 151967, FEB. 16, 2005 RELUCIO VS. MEJIA-LOPEZ, G.R. NO. 138497, JAN. 16, 2002

AGAPAY VS. CA, G.R. NO. 116668, JULY 28, 1997 MAXEY VS. CA., 129 SCRA 187 GONZALES VS. GONZALES, G.R. NO. 159521, DEC. 16, 2005 ABING VS. WAEYAN, G.R. NO. 146294, JULY 31, 2006. V. FAMILY. A. MEMBERS OF FAMILY- ART. 150.

B. ARTICLE 151. EARNEST EFFORTS TO COMPROMISE. REP. ACT 8369 AN ACT ESTABLISHING FAMILY COURTS. SPS. WEE VS. GALVEZ, G.R. NO. 147394, AUG. 11, 2004 GUERRERO VS. RTC, ILOCOS NORTE, 229 SCRA 274 MARITAL DISQUALIFICATION RULE IN ALVAREZ VS. RAMIREZ (OCT. 14, 2005) HIYAS SAVINGS & LOAN BANK VS. ACUA, G.R. NO. 154132, AUG. 31, 2006 MARTINEZ VS. MARTINEZ, G.R. NO. 162084, JUNE 28, 2005 SANTOS VS. SANTOS-GUERRERO, G.R. NO. 134787, NOV. 15, 2005 VI. FAMILY HOME. SPS. KELLEY VS. PLANTERS PRODUCTS INC., G.R. No. 172263. July 9, 2008 PATRICIO VS. DARIO III, G.R. NO. 170829, NOV. 20, 2006 A. BENEFICIARIES. ARTICLE 154.

MANACOP VS. CA, G.R. NO. 97898, AUG. 11, 1977 B. ARTICLE 155.

SPS. VERSOLA VS. COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. NO. 164740, JULY 31, 2006 C. RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.

MODEQUILLO VS. BREVA, 185 SCRA 766. Also read GOMEZ VS. STA. INES, OCT. 14, 2005 VII. A. B. PATERNITY AND FILIATION. CONCEPT PRESUMPTION OF LEGITIMACY

SSS VS. AGUAS, FEB. 27, 2006 CONCEPCION VS. CA, AUG. 31, 2005 U.S. VS. MATA, 18 PHIL. 490 DE JESUS VS. ESTATE OF DIZON, G.R. NO. 142877, OCT. 2, 2001 (J. VITUG) C. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN. ARTICLE 165. D. ACTION TO IMPUGN LEGITIMACY ACTION TO CLAIM LEGITIMACY. TISON VS. CA., G.R. NO. 12027, JULY 31, 1997 1. GROUNDS: ANDAL & DUEAS VS. MACARAIG, 89 PHIL. 165

JAO VS. CA, 152 SCRA 359 1.A) PROOFS OF FILIATION: GO KIM HUY VS. GO KIM HUY, G.R. NO. 137674, SEPT. 20, 2001 ROCES VS. LOCAL CIVIL REGISTRAR, 102 PHIL. 1050 REITERATED DURING THE EFFECTIVITY OF THE FAMILY CODE IN PEOPLE VS. DELANTIN. ILANO VS. CA, G.R. NO. 104376, FEB. 23, 1994. LABAGALA VS. SANTIAGO, G.R. NO. 132305, DEC. 4, 2001 DE APARICHO VS. PARAGUYA, G.R. NO. L-29771, MAY 29, 19987 BARRUECO VS. CONSUL GENERAL, 74 PHIL. 151 MENDOZA VS. CA, 201 SCRA 675 CRUZ VS. CRISTOBAL, G.R. NO. 140422, AUG. 7, 2006 . TIJING VS. CA, G.R. NO.125901, MARCH 8, 2001 HERRERA VS. ALBA, JUNE 15, 2005 COLORADO VS. CA, GR 39948, FEB. 28, 1985 2. REAL PARTY IN INTEREST. LIYAO, JR. VS. TANHOTI-LIYAO, G.R. NO. 138961, MARCH 7, 2002 3. WHEN TO FILE? E. RIGHTS OF LEGITIMATE CHILDREN. ARTICLE 174; F. ILLEGITIMATE FILIATION. PE LIM VS. CA, G.R. NO. 11229, MARCH 18, 1997. RIVERO VS. CA, MAY 17, 2005 BERNABE VS. ALEJO, G.R. NO. 140500, JANUARY 21, 2002 REP. ACT NO. 9255- AN ACT ALLOWING ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN TO USE THE SURNAME OF THEIR FATHER, AMENDING ART. 176 OF THE FAMILY CODE. MOSSESGELD VS. CA., G.R. NO. 111455, DEC. 23, 1998 REPUBLIC VS. VIVENCIO, DEC. 14, 1998 G. LEGITIMATED CHILDREN. H. ADOPTION. 1) REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8552 NEW DOMESTIC ADOPTION ACT. 2) REPUBLIC ACT NO. 8043 INTER-COUNTRY ADOPTION ACT. 3) WHO MAY ADOPT? 4) WHO MAY BE ADOPTED ? MEMORIZE ARTICLE 8, R.A. NO. 8552. 5) WRITTEN CONSENT CANG VS. CLAVANO, G.R. NO. 105308, SEPT. 25, 1998. TAMARGO VS. CA, 209 SCRA 518

6.) EFFECTS OF ADOPTION: (a.) PARENTAL AUTHORITY OF BIOLOGICAL PARENTS. (b.) RIGHT THE SAME AS LEGITIMATE (SEC. 17, ART.V) (c.) SURNAME OF THE ADOPTED (d.) SUCCESSION MARIATEGUI VS. CA., 204 SCRA 337. (ALSO SEE SAYSON VS. CA, 205 SCRA 321). (d.) RESCISSION (e.) DISINHERITANCE, AVAILABLE TO ADOPTER. SEE ART. 919 IN RE: ADOPTION OF STEPHANIE ASTORGA GARCIA, G.R. NO. 148311, MARCH 31, 2005 REP. VS. HERNANDEZ, 253 SCRA 522 CHING LENG VS. GALANG, 104 PHIL. 1058 RA 9225 SEC. 4, RE: DERIVATIVE CITIZENSHIP REYES VS. HON. SOTERO, FEB. 16, 2006. I. SUPPORT.

QUISUMBING VS. ICAO, 34 SCRA 132 LACSON VS. LACSON, G.R. NO. 150644, AUG. 28, 2006 PATRICIO VS. DARIO III, G.R. NO. 170829, NOV. 20, 2006 J. PARENTAL AUTHORITY. [ART. 2189(2) a AND (4) a] (ART. 221, FAMILY CODE). PARENTS ARE PRIMARILY LIABLE. REP. ACT 6809 LOWERED LEGAL AGE FROM 21 TO 18 YRS. OLD. 1.) CUSTODY OF CHILD. GAMBOA-HIRSCH VS. CA, G.R. NO. 174485, JULY 11, 2007 TONOG VS. CA, G.R. NO. 122906, FEB. 7, 2002 SAGALA-ESLAO VS. CA, 266 SCRA 317 PEREZ VS. CA, 255 SCRA 661 TENDER AGE PRESUMPTION. TIJING VS. CA, G.R. NO.125901, MARCH 8, 2001 MADRIAN VS. MADRIAN, G.R. NO. 159374, JULY 12, 2007 BONDAGJY VS. BONDAGJY, G.R. NO. 140817, DEC. 7, 2001 LAXAMANA VS. LAXAMANA, G.R. NO. 144763, SEPT. 3, 2002 LUNA VS. IAC, 137 SCRA 7 SANTOS VS. CA, MARCH 19, 1996 2.) SPECIAL PARENTAL AUTHORITY SUBSTITUTE PARENTAL AUTHORITY COMPARE ART. 218, FAMILY CODE. AND ART. 2180, CIVIL CODE. EXCONDE VS. CAPUNO, G.R. l-10134, JUNE 29, 1957 AMADORA VS. CA, GR NO. L-47745, APRIL 15, 1988 SALVOSA VS. IAC, G.R. NO. L-70458, OCT. 5, 1988

ST. MARYS ACADEMY VS. SPS. CARPITANOS, G.R. NO. 143363, FEB. 6, 3) LIABILITY K. EMANCIPATION ART. 236 EMANCIPATION TERMINATES PARENTAL AUTHORITY. RA 6809, TOOK EFFECT DEC. 13, 1989, 18 YRS., AGE OF MAJORITY. ELCANO VS. HILL, 77 SCRA 98 SEE REP. ACT 7610 CHILD ABUSE ACT. VIII. DECLARATION SEPARATION. OF NULLITY ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE LEGAL

READ A.M. NO. 02-11-10-SC (EFFECTIVE MARCH 15, 2003), A. WHO CAN FILE? ENRICO VS. HEIRS OF SPS. MEDINACELI, G.R. NO. 173614, SEPT. 28, 2007 SALMINGO VS. RUBICA, A.C. NO. 6573, JULY 9, 2007 B. WHEN TO FILE PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD: C. GROUNDS: C.1.) NULLITY OF MARRIAGE VALDES VS. RTC, 260 SCRA 221. DOMINGO VS. COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. NO. 104818, SEPT. 17, 1993 MERCADO VS. TAN, G.R. NO. 137110, AUG. 1, 2000 REPUBLIC VS. MOLINA, GR 108763, FEB. 13, 1997 CHI MING TSOI VS. CA, 266 SCRA 325 (JAN. 16, 1997) MARCOS VS. MARCOS, 343 SCRA 755 (OCT. 19, 2000) REPUBLIC VS. MATIAS DAGDAG, 351 SCRA 425 (FEB. 9, 2001) BARCELONA VS. CA, G.R. NO. 130087, SEPT. 24, 2003 DEDEL VS. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL., G.R. NO. 151867, JAN. 29, BUENAVENTURA VS. CA, MARCH 31, 2005 PARAS VS. PARAS, G.R. NO. 147824, AUGUST 2, 2007 NOTE: BIGAMOUS BUT VALID MARRIAGE ART. 41 REPUBLIC VS. NOLASCO, 220 SCRA 20 C.2.) ANNULMENT OF MARRIAGE ARTICLE 45, 46. RUIZ V. ATIENZA, CA, 40 O.G.1903 MACARRUBO VS. ATTY. MACARRUBO, A.C. NO. 6148, FEB. 27, 2004 SARAO VS. GUEVARA, (CA) 40 O.G. (1
ST

SUP.) 263

JIMENEZ VS. REPUBLIC, 109 PHIL. 274.

BUCCAT VS. BUCCAT, 72 PHIL. 19 AQUINO VS. DELIZO, 109 PHIL. 21 ANAYA VS. PALARAON, L-2930, NOV. 26, 1970 VILLANUEVA VS. CA, G.R. NO. 132955, OCT. 27, 2006 C.3.) LEGAL SEPARATION ARTICLE 55. ONG VS. ONG, G.R. NO. 153206, OCT. 23, 2006 D. EFFECTS ONCE PETITION IS GRANTED: 1.) 2.) 3.) 4.) 5.) 6.) 7.) MARRIAGE BOND PROPERTY RELATIONS STATUS OF CHILDREN CUSTODY OF CHILDREN INHERITANCE DONATIONS BY REASON OF MARRIAGE INSURANCE POLICY

YU VS. YU, G.R. NO. 164915, MARCH 10, 2006 VIII. CIVIL REGISTERREPUBLIC ACT 9048 CLERICAL ERROR ACT. TOOK EFFECT ON APRIL 22, 2001. REPUBLIC VS. CAGANDAHAN[G.R. No. 166676, September 12, 2008 SILVERIO VS. REPUBLIC, G.R. No. No. 174689, Oct. 22, 2007 BARCO VS. COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. NO. 120587, JAN. 20, 2004. PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME OF JULIAN LIN CARULASAN WANG, G.R. NO. 159966, MARCH 30, 2005 LEE VS. CA, G.R. NO. 118387, OCTOBER 11, 2001 BABIERA VS. CATOTAL, G.R. NO. 138493, JUNE 15, 2000 RP VS. CAPOTE, G.R. NO. 157043, FEB. 2, 2007 REP. VS. KHO, G.R. NO. 170340, JUNE 29, 2007 SILVERIO VS. REPUBLIC, G.R. NO. 174689, OCT. 22, 2007

-ATTY. LIZA -

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi