Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The association of the Jewish people with the land of Palestine
presents an historical phenomenon as singular as the survival of
that people itself. It would, indeed, appear that the two phenomena
are closely inter-related, for historical experience has shown that
this attachment to the ancient home has been a potent factor in
maintaining the identity of the Jewish People during their long
exile. It was in Palestine that the Jews went through the unique
experience of the spirit which has for all time shaped their
character and destiny. But that experience has also exercised an
indelible influence on the land of Palestine. It has fixed its place in
the history of mankind.
No other people of the many that possessed it has left so deep a
mark on that ancient land. No other has been so profoundly
affected by it. When the Jewish Commonwealth was destroyed by
the might of
Imperial Rome, the Jews became a homeless and exiled people.
They ceased to be a political force in the life of mankind. Equally
so, the land of Palestine disappeared from the political map of the
world. It became a backward province of successive empires. It
never again
attained indigenous statehood. It was only in the Balfour
Declaration that both the Jewish People and the land of Palestine
reappeared as political entities. It gave international recognition
both to the people and to the land, and it did so by holding out the
promise of their reunion. The wheel of history has turned full
circle.
SUMMARY.
In the light of the above survey, the character of the historical
connection of the Jewish people with Palestine may be briefly
summarised as follows:
(1) The Jews were the first civilising occupants of Palestine. They
took root in it and governed it for a period infinitely longer than
that of any of its numerous subsequent rulers. During that period
they set up in the country a state of their own, the only native state
Palestine has ever had. They developed it politically, economically
and culturally. In the process of that development and under the
influence of the country they grew into a nation of distinctive
character. They found in it a relationship of their own to the
Infinite. To that spiritual experience they gave significant expres-
sion in classic literature, which in its turn has shaped the character
of the Jewish nation and has also deeply affected the religious and
moral history of the human race.
(2) The Jews were driven out of Palestine by the overwhelming
forces of the Assyrian and Roman Empires. They clung to their
native soil with fierce tenacity, as evidenced by the literature and
the historical monuments of their conquerors. They never resigned
themselves to their exile, as did so many other conquered nations
of antiquity. As soon as they were released they returned from the
Babylonian captivity, and it was Jewish noblemen and high
officials in the Persian service who headed the returning exiles.
They fought with unparalleled courage and resource against the
imperial power of Rome. The last phase of the second Jewish state
was an almost uninterrupted series of revolts against the Roman
provincial governors. The final revolt, known as the Judaean War,
was, according to Roman records, one of the fiercest national
struggles which the Roman legions ever had to face. Even after the
conquest of Jerusalem and the destruction of their national sanctu-
ary, they did not give up the struggle for their independence. Fifty
years later they rose again in a great national insurrection and for
many months defied the Roman forces until at last they were
crushed. It was as the result of that devastating defeat that the
Jewish political power in Palestine was finally destroyed. Yet for
centuries after that destruction the Jews continued to cling stub-
bornly to the country, and it was only the policy of extermination
and expropriation pursued by the Romans and Byzantines which in
the end drove the bulk of the Jewish people out of Palestine.
(3) Though the major part of the nation was forced into exile, there
has always remained a Jewish settlement in Palestine. Its fortunes
varied from generation to generation, but its continuity was never
broken. However terrible the oppression, the Jews never
abandoned their native land. Nor did they merge into any of the
numerous racial and religious communities which held sway in
Palestine in subsequent centuries. They remained a distinctive
national-religious entity, temporarily subjugated, but never doubt-
ful of their ultimate restoration.
(4) Throughout the centuries of their exile the Jews con tinued to
regard Palestine as their national and religious centre. The Jewish
liturgy and religious rites, their sacred and secular literature, the
provisions of Rabbinical Law and the folklore of the Jewish
Diaspora — all these bear testimony to the intense attachment of
the dispersed communities to the national home. Had the Jews lost
their attachment to Palestine they would have ceased to exist as a
separate national group and to suffer by reason of such distinc-
tiveness. In a very real sense the Jewish world-tragedy may ulti-
mately be traced to that tenacious attachment.
(5) The many proposals and schemes for a Jewish national
restoration in Palestine which emanated at various periods from
non-Jewish sources, indicate that the Jewish connection with
Palestine was a conception deeply rooted also in the consciousness
of the non-Jewish world. As the instances quoted show, it was
particularly strong in England, not merely in theological and
literary circles, but also among men of affairs and prominent
statesmen. The Balfour Declaration represents but the final
consummation of a development which dates backs to the era of
Puritan political philosophy.
(6) The numerous Messianic and pseudo-Messianic movements
which sprang up generation after generation in one part or another
of the Diaspora prove that the Jewish attachment to Palestine was
not of a mere esoteric or romantic character. Jews were always
ready to leave all they possessed and “ascend” to Palestine. They
frequently fell a prey to visionaries or impostors who knew how to
exploit that ever-present readiness.
(7) From the days of the return from the first captivity to the era of
the Balfour Declaration, the Jews have seized every opportunity
that offered itself to return to Palestine. Century after century has
seen movements of re-immigration. To go back and live in the
Holy Land was regarded as the fulfilment of a sacred
duty, and to the devout Jew the crowning glory of his life and the
realisation of his most cherished dream was to end his days on the
holy soil of the Land of Israel. Whenever political conditions
permitted, attempts were made to effect a re-settlement. The
present wave of imimgration and settlement is only the latest phase
of a movement that has never ceased since the destruction of the
Jewish State.
(8) The supreme vindication of the reality of the Jewish attach-
ment to Palestine is to be found in the extraordinary intensity of the
present effort of reconstruction. It was only because they felt
themselves to be the protagonists of the redemption of the people
and the land of Israel, that pioneers of the new settlement were
able to produce the achievements and endure the sacrifices
recorded in preceding pages. No scheme of Jewish colonisation in
any other country — there have been several such enterprises in
the New World — has elicited that supreme devotion and self-
sacrifice which is depicted so vividly in the last quoted Report of
the first High Commissioner; none has so focussed the creative
energies of the Jewish people as a whole. The Jews have felt exiles
throughout the ages of their dispersion. They have never again
created a polity of their own anywhere else. It was the latent
energy accumulated during that long-drawn exile which found
creative expression in the new effort of community building in
Palestine, which for its part, too, had remained unproductive,
physically as well as spiritually during those many centuries. The
new Jewish Palestine has been re-created virtually out of nothing.
It has been built up under conditions which, according to all
normal standards, could not be regarded as other than utterly
hopeless. None but spiritual forces can explain such phenomena as
the successful establishment of agricultural colonies in a malaria-
ridden country by settlers without any training or experience, or as
the growth within two decades of a city like Tel Aviv literally out
of sand. None but spiritual forces can explain the rejection by the
pogrom-harrassed Russian Jews of the generous offer of a vast
territory in East Africa. These spiritual forces, as revealed by the
events of the last few months, are still at work. In the very midst of
the disturbances, while almost daily people were being shot and
killed, trains derailed and houses and crops destroyed, some 20,000
new immigrants entered Palestine. Among these were hundreds of
young boys and girls sent by parents who themselves could not
come but who felt no hesitation in letting their children go. No
people settled for centuries on the soil of its native land could have
given a more genuine proof of the reality of its attachment to that
land. It is the survival of that spiritual attachment which ensures
the continuance of the achievements and sacrifices of the past also
in the future. It is the very abnormality of the conditions under
which the Jewish effort proceeds which holds the secret of its
success.
(9) It is in the light of these facts that the unparalleled character of
the Jewish historical connection with Palestine will be apparent. It
is a connection sui generis There is no other instance of a people
driven out of its country maintaining an attachment so intense and
unbroken during so many centuries. It is that basic fact which is
ignored when the facile allegation is made that the Jews are “in-
truders in an Arab country”. “If the Arabs”, said Lord Milner in the
course of a memorable speech in the House of Lords (House of
Lords Debates, 1923, Vol. 4, col. 669.), “go to the length of
claiming Palestine as one of their countries in the same sense as
Mesopotamia or Arabia proper is an Arab country, then I think they
are flying in the face of facts, of all history, of all tradition, and of
associations of the most important character — I had almost said
the most sacred character….. The future of Palestine cannot
possibly be left to be determined by the temporary impressions and
feelings of the Arab majority in the country of the present day.” It
is sometimes sought facetiously to belittle the significance of the
Jewish connection with Palestine by comparing it with other
historical instances of former dominion. It is asserted that it might
similarly be pleaded that the Italians had a claim to a national
home in Great Britain because that country had once formed part
of the Roman Empire. The conclusive reply to that specious
argument is that the Italians were never settled in England and that
they have and always have had a home of their own in Italy, whilst
the Jews are not merely the ancient rulers but also the former
settlers of Palestine and never had and to this day do not possess
any other national home. It is ‘because of that homelessness and
because “they have never forgotten” that the Jews have a claim to
the restoration of their national life in Palestine.
E N D