1. 2. Since the name of the party is Prosecutor V Tadic, it probably is a case of the International Criminal Court.

According to Rule 21.5.7, cite cases of the International Crminal Court by case name; case number; type of ruling; paragraph number, if necessary; and date. Hence, the proper citation for the case should be: Prosecutor V. Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-T, Opinion & Judgment, 573 (July 15, 1999). 3. 87 AM J. INTL L indicated this is a American Journal of International Law on Bluebook Page 445. Hence, this is a periodical materials and rule 16 of the bluebook will govern. Cite articles of the periodical materials by authors full name, title of article, journal volume no. abbreviation of journal, page on which article begins, span of specific pages cited, date of publication, and parenthetical describing content of pages cited. In addition, no comma should follow after the See. See should not be italicized. Hence, the proper citation for the article should be: See Judith Gail Gardam, Proportionality and Force in International Law, 87AM J. INTL L. 391, 404-410 (1993). 4. S.C Resolution and S/RES indicated that this is a United Nation Security Council resolutions. Hence, it is govern by the rule 21.7.2(b). According to the rule, cite Security Council resolutions in accordance with either rule 21.7.2(a)(i) or 21.7.2(a)(ii). However, this is more like a citation to electronic version found in the Official Document System (ODS), hence, rule 21.7.2 (a)(ii) governs. In addition, rule 21.7.2(b) provided some examples about how to cite the resolution. It also indicates that resolution symbols are created by inserting S/RES prior to the resolution number. The Resolution should be Res. Instead. The format of the date is incorrect as well. Hence, the proper citation for the resolution should be: S.C. Res. 508, 9, U.N. Doc. S/RES/508 (June. 5, 1982).

5. S.C.R indicates this is a Supreme Court of Canada case. In addition, this is a case decided by year of 1985, hence, Table 2.6 (2) govern because it is in the Supreme Court Reports from 1975 to date. According to the rule, citation format should be: Case name, reporter year, volume number, reporter abbreviation, first page, country abbreviation, province abbreviation, if applicable, court abbreviation, if applicable. The rule further provides some examples about how to properly cite the case. The year of the original citation was not correct. Hence, the proper citation for the case should be: R. v. Big M Drug Mart Ltd., [1993] 1 S.C.R. 295 (Can.).

6. UCLA J. Intl L. & Foreign Aff indicates this is an article from UCLA journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs. Hence, Rule 16 governs. Moreover, it should be UCLA J. INTL L. & FOREIGN AFF. In addition, See, e.g. should follow by a comma. There is no specific rule govern a date of publication is on two years, and it probably should not be. Hence, it should be either 1997 or 1998. However, assuming the date of publication on two years is correct, I can only find under Rule 16.7.1, it provide a example of how to cite multiple years, and it should be 1997-1998 instead of 1997/1998. At last, the span of specific page cited is missing. Hence, the proper citation for the article should be: See, e.g., Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, How To Reform The United Nations: Lessons From the International Economic Law Revolution, 2 UCLA J. INTL L. & FOREIGN AFF. 185, (span of specific page cited) (1997-1998).

7. Compare.,with Both word should be in Italic. (bluebook Rule 1(b)). First case Commonwealth V Kallinger was properly cited. However, the case Zant v. Prevatte, it seems like page 715 was the fist page of case, but specific page referred to was missing. Hence, the proper citation for the article should be: Compare Commonwealth v. Kallinger, 580 A.2d 887, 893 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1990) ( upholds forcible feeding of hunger-striking prisoner, because states interests in prison security and discipline, prevention of suicide, and integrity of medical

profession, outweighed inmates individual freedoms), with Zant V Prevatte, 286 S.E.2d 715, (specific page refer to) (Ga. 1982) (held that an inmate may refuse to allow nutrition intrusions on his person, even though calculated to preserve his life).

8. WASH.U.J.L & POLY indicates this is a article from Washington University Washington University Journal of Law & Policy. Hence, Bluebook Rule 16 governs. Again, the citation missed span of specific pages cited. Hence, the proper citation of the article should be: See, Tracey M. Ohm, What They Can Do About It: Prison Administrations Authority to Force-Feed Hunger-Striking Inmates, 23 WASH. U. J.L. & POLY 151, (Span of specific pages cited) (2007) (discusses the split in decisions by modern state courts on the issue of force-feeding for hunger strikes).

9.

10. This is an Australian case. Hence, T2.2 govern. The abbreviation v for versus is not followed by a period. Citation format, according to the rule: <case name, in italics> (<year of publication, when different from volume number>) <volume number> <reporter abbreviation> <first page>, <page(s) of specific material, if desired> (<country abbreviation if not evident from context>). Reporter should be CLR instead of C.L.R. At last, the country abbreviation should be Austl. instead of Australia. Hence, the proper citation of the case should be: Australian Communist Party v Commonwealth (1951) 83 CLR 1, (pages of specific material,) (Austl.). Passage 1: Footnote #1:

CAL.L.REV indicates this is California Law Review. Hence, rule 16 governs. The Span of specific pages cited is missing. Authors full name should followed by a comma. Hence, the proper citation should be: Jenny S. Lam, Accountability for Private Military Contractors Under the Alien Tort Statute, 97 CAL. L. REV. 1459, (span of specific pages cited), (2009).

Footnote #2: According to the rule, if the work is cited as the immediately preceding authority within the same footnote or as the sole authority within the immediately preceding footnote, use Id. and indicate any difference in page number. Hence, here, the Id. should refer to the previous footnote, which is Footnote #1. Since Footnote #1 is a periodical material, Footnote #2 must come from the same periodical materials. Therefore, Rule 16 governs. Rule 16.9, example 4 provided the correct citation, and the original citation missed an at before the page number. Hence, the proper citation should be: Id. at 1461.

Passage #2: Footnote #3: CARDOZO J. INTl & COMPARATIVE L. indicates this is an article from Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law. Hence, rule 16 governs. However, according to Table 13: it should be cited as CARDOZO J. INTL & COMP. L. Hence, the proper citation should be: Valerie C. Charles, Hired Guns and Higher Law: A Tortured Expansion of the Military Contractor Defense, 14 CARDOZO J. INTL & COMP. L. 593, 595-596 (2006). Footnote #4: First, U.S.C indicates this is an U.S statue. Hence, Rule 12 governs.

First, according to the rule, date of code edition cited should be included. In addition, it should include sign before the specific section number. Hence, the proper citation should be: 28 U.S.C. 1350 (date of the code cited) Footnote #5: There are two citation in the footnote. Statue: this is a short forms for statues because 28 U.S.C 1350 has been cited. According to Rule 12.10, this short citation form is correct. Law Review Article: Since the article has been cited in footnote 1 already, this is periodical material short citation form. Rule 16.9 (b) governs. The Supra should be in italic. There should be a at between the note 1, and page number been cited. Hence, the proper citation for the article should be: Lam, Supra note 1, at 1464.

Footnote #6: This is a case decided by District of Columbia, Hence, Table 1 and Rule 10 governs. The span of specific pages referred to is missing. The deciding court should be D.C. Cir. V must follow by a period. There is no period after Titan Corp First page of case must follow by a comma. Hence, the accurate citation should be Saleh v. Titan Corp, 580 F.3d 1, (span of specific pages referred to) (D.C. Cir. 2009). Footnote 7: This footnote is correctly cited. Footnote 8: According to rule 3.5, the pp. is used to refer to other pages within the same piece. Here, the last sentence of the passage 2 still analysis the case of footnote 6, hence, it is incorrect to use pp. here. Hence, the proper citation should be: Id. at 15-16.