Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
"When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in
numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it,
when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge is of a meagre
and unsatisfactory kind. It may be the beginning of knowledge, but you
have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced to the stage of science."
Page 1 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page01.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 27 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page27.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
and at the far right, uranium fission in atomic reactors also releases energy:
235
(This is only one of many ways in which the U nucleus can break down.)
The maximum stability of the iron nucleus is the reason why the element-
building process by successive fusion reactions, outlined in Chapter 8, stops at
iron. Beyond iron the fusion process is energy-requiring instead of energy-
yielding. The heavier elements are built up by more indirect processes
involving neutron capture.
Page 26 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page26.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
The mass loss or binding energy per nuclear particle (protons and This curve gives us information that was used in the discussion of
neutrons) rises rapidly to a maximum at iron, then falls. Iron is the stellar synthesis of elements in Chapter 8. Iron is the most stable
most stable nucleus of all. The mass losses or binding energies nucleus of all. For elements with smaller atomic numbers than
per nucleon are plotted above for all nuclei from helium through iron, fusion of nuclei to produce heavier elements releases
uranium. After some initial minor irregularities in the first- and energy, because the products are lighter and more stable on a
second-row elements, the values settle down to a smooth curve, per-nucleon basis than the reactants. In contrast, beyond iron,
which rises to a maximum at iron, then begins a long descending fusion absorbs energy because the products are heavier on a per-
slope through uranium and beyond. nucleon basis than the reactants.
Page 25 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page25.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Solution.
The atom contains 26 protons, 26 electrons, and 30 neutrons, so the
mass calculation is performed as opposite:
Notice that the mass loss per nucleon, and hence the binding energy per
nucleon, is greater for iron than for helium. This means that the iron nucleus is
more stable relative to protons and neutrons than the helium nucleus is. If
some combination of helium nuclei could be induced to produce an iron
nucleus, energy would be given off, which would correspond to the increased
stability of the product nucleus per nuclear particle.
Page 24 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page24.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Every atomic nucleus is lighter than the sum of the masses of the nucleons
from which it is built, and this mass loss corresponds to the binding energy of
the nucleus. The relative stability of two nuclei with different numbers of
nucleons can be assessed by comparing their mass loss per nucleon.
Example:
What is the mass loss per nucleon for the helium atom?
Solution:
The total mass loss is 0.0305 amu, and since the nucleus has four nucleons,
the mass loss per nucleon is 0.00763 amu.
Page 23 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page23.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
(We must include electrons in this calculation because 4.0026 Compared to common chemical reactions, this is an enormous
amu is the mass of the helium-4 atom, not the nucleus.) This quantity of energy. Since 1 electron volt per atom is equivalent to
missing mass corresponds to 0.0305 x 931.4 MeV = 28.4 MeV of 23.06 kcal per mole,
energy. If we could put together a helium atom directly from two
neutrons, two protons, and two electrons, then 28.4 MeV of
energy would be given off for every atom formed:
-1
= 655,000,000 kcal mole
Page 22 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page22.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
What holds a nucleus together? If we attempt to bring two protons and two
neutrons together to form a helium nucleus, we might reasonably expect the
positively charged protons to repel one another violently. Then what keeps
them together in the nucleus? The answer, as we mentioned in Chapter 2,
is that a helium atom is lighter than the sum of two protons, two neutrons, and
two electrons. Some of the mass of the separated particles is converted into
energy and dissipated when the nucleus is formed. Before the helium nucleus
can be torn apart into its component particles, this dissipated energy must be
restored and turned back into mass. Unless this energy is provided, the
nucleus cannot be taken apart. This energy is termed the binding energy of the
helium nucleus.
Page 21 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page21.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 20 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page20.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
The final step is to add these two individually balanced half-reactions and obtain
an overall reaction in which electrons do not appear explicitly. To accomplish
this, we must add one unit of the manganese reaction to five units of the iron
reaction. The result is the same as before:
This overall equation is now balanced with respect to charge and number of
atoms because the half-reactions were balanced, and with respect to oxidation
number because the proper multiples of the half-reactions were chosen to make
the electrons cancel.
Page 19 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page19.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Example.
Balance the iron and permanganate reaction by the half-reaction method.
Solution.
The unbalanced permanganate half-reaction is
This half-reaction is now balanced with respect to both number of atoms and
overall charge, +2 on each side.
Page 18 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page18.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
It is obvious that five iron atoms are required for every manganese
atom, in order that the changes in oxidation numbers cancel:
In choosing a 1-to-5 ratio of Mn-to-Fe, we ensured that oxidation
number was conserved. By adding the hydrogen ions we obtained
an equation that balanced the number of each atom. As a final
Eight hydrogen ions are needed to use up the four oxygen atoms check, the net charge on each side of the equation can be tested,
on the left, leading to four water molecules on the right: and found to be the same: +17. This oxidation-reduction equation
now is balanced with respect to electrons, atoms, and charge.
Page 17 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page17.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Example.
Potassium permanganate, , is a common inorganic oxidizing agent,
which becomes reduced to manganous ion, Mn , in acidic solution. Write a
balanced equation for the reaction in which permanganate oxidizes ferrous iron,
2+ 3+
Fe , to ferric ion, Fe .
Solution.
Formula MnO4-
Page 16 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page16.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
For electrons to balance properly, three moles of H must be oxidised for every
mole of NO3- reduced: The planar, delocallised nitrate ion
3 (+1) + (-3) = 0
Formula NO3-
This has accounted for the three hydrogen atoms and the negative charge. The
-
equation is correct for basic solutions where OH ions are present.
Page 15 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page15.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 14 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page14.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
We also could have balanced the equation by seeing to it that the net change in
oxidation number of all substances was zero. If the oxidation number of one
oxygen atom decreases by two, then two hydrogen atoms each must increase
by one. In physical terms, if one oxygen atom pulls two electrons toward itself,
then two hydrogen atoms are required to donate one electron each. In terms of
changes in oxidation number,
2H O
Changes in ON: 2(+1) + (-2) = 0
This was a trivial example, but the following example is not quite so trivial. If
oxygen is in short supply, some bacteria can respire using nitrates as sources of
oxidizing power instead of O . Rather than reducing oxygen to water, these
2
bacteria reduce nitrates to NO , NO, or N .
2 2
Page 13 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page13.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 12 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page12.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Example.
Glucose is a sugar with the chemical formula , and is a common
energy source for living organisms. How many moles of oxygen are required to
burn a mole of glucose, and how many grams of are needed for a kilogram
of glucose?
Page 11 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page11.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
-1
113.4 moles O x 32.00 g mole = 3629 g O
2 2
The entire calculation could have been set up in one step: Formula C3H8
Page 10 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page10.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
since we know that the combustion products are carbon dioxide and water.
The balancing process is given in the illustration opposite:
In brief, if three molecules are formed from the three carbon atoms in one
propane molecule, then six oxygen atoms or three molecules will be
required. In addition, the eight hydrogen atoms in propane will lead to four
water molecules, thereby requiring two more molecules of . The balanced
equation is
From the balanced equation and these molecular weights we can verify that
mass is conserved during the reaction:
Page 9 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page09.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
From the balanced equation, one can obtain information about the relative
amounts of reactants and products involved. The molecular weights of ,
and are 2.02 g, 32.00 g, and 18.02 g, respectively. Hence 2 x 2.02 g of
hydrogen react with 1 x 32.00 g of oxygen to form 2 x 18.02 g of water:
The total weight of reactants before the reaction is the same as the weight of
the products after the reaction; mass has been conserved.
Example.
Propane, , is a low-pollution fuel gas that can be burned in existing
automobile engines with only minor engine adjustments. How many moles of
are required to burn one mole of propane, and how many grams of are
used with a kilogram of propane?
Page 8 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page08.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
The symbols in a properly balanced chemical equation tell much more than just
the identity of reactant and product molecules. The equation
Page 7 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page07.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
We ordinarily do not make the distinction between weight and mass. When we
say that an object "weighs one gram," what we really mean is that it "weighs
what a one-gram mass would weigh on Earth." The gravitational constant, g,
is one sixth as large on the moon, so the same mass will have only one sixth
the weight there that it has on Earth. When we say that a one-gram object
"weighs only one sixth of a gram on the moon," we mean that it is pulled
toward the moon with the same force that the Earth would exert on a one-
sixth-gram mass. As long as we are making only Earth-bound comparisons,
no confusion need arise between weight and mass. We will use the terms
"atomic weights" and "atomic masses" interchangeably.
Page 6 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page06.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
In principle, if a reaction gives off energy, the products formed must have lower
energy and be lighter than the reactants. But a release of 100 kcal by a
typical chemical reaction corresponds (via the Einstein relationship) to a mass
loss of only 5 x 10 amu per molecule, or one hundred thousandth the mass of
an electron. This amounts to only 5 x 10 gram per mole, which is far less than
we can measure. This is why we can say that, for chemical reactions, mass and
energy are conserved independently.
Many properties other than mass are not conserved in chemical reactions:
volume, density, shape, thermal conductivity, hardness, color, and others. It
was Antoine Lavoisier, the brilliant French chemist who revolutionized
chemistry before he went to the guillotine in 1794, who realized that mass was
more fundamental than any of these properties. When you ask "How much?" in
chemistry, you basically are asking "What mass?"
Page 5 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page05.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Carbon and hydrogen atoms are oxidized, because they begin by sharing
electrons equally with neighboring atoms, but end by forming C O and H O
bonds in which oxygen exerts the greater pull on the electrons.
If we look at mass and energy closely enough, the principles that they
individually are conserved turn out to be only approximately true. Mass and
energy actually are interconvertible, and are different manifestations of the
same thing. We can uncouple them in thinking about chemical reactions only
because the quantities of energy involved in chemical processes correspond to
infinitesimal amounts of mass.
Page 4 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page04.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Energy also is conserved in chemical reactions, within the limits of our ability to
measure it. The amount of energy in the universe at the end of the propane
reaction is the same as at the beginning. If a process gives off energy (the
propane reaction does), then the product molecules must have less energy
than the reactants, by the amount given off.
Page 3 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page03.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 2 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page02.htm 2006/12/10
Foundations to Chemistry - adapted from "Chemistry, Matter and the Universe" Page 1 of 1
Page 2 of 37
http://neon.chem.ox.ac.uk/vrchemistry/Conservation/page02.htm 2006/12/10