Comparative Table Objective of study of Ethics and its definitions

Authors Definition Features Similarities Differences

Escobar Ethics is the branch of  Its object of study is human The definition presented The author talks about
Gustavo; Ethics philosophy that studies human acts (also referred to as by the author agrees with the things that man does
introduction to acts as good or bad. "morality"). the others in considering is depending on his
its problems and  It is important to mention that ethics as the study of morals whether it is
history; Mc Graw when we speak of human acts human behavior and important or not,
Hill. we are referring to actions in actions. favorable or not. Man
which intelligence and will are obeys reactions of his
involved and which can own nature whether they
therefore be judged as good or are good or bad.
bad, unlike, for example, the
acts of man, which are due to
reactions inherent to our
nature.
Adolfo Sánchez Ethics is the theory or science  Ethics is not morality and Although one of the The author's definition
Vázquez; Ética of the moral behavior of men in therefore cannot be reduced to objects of study of ethics differs by stating that
tratados y society, i.e., it is the science of a a set of rules and is the human being and ethics specifically studies
manuales specific form of human conduct. prescriptions; its mission is to his morality, these two human behavior.
Grijalbo. explain effective morality. terms clarify that they are
 its object of study is one type not the same and do not
of human acts: the conscious depend on each other to
and voluntary acts of exist.
individuals that affect certain
other social groups or society
as a whole.
.

García Alonso The term "Ethics" from its
Luz; Ethics or origins to the present day has
moral been enriched with different
philosophy. nuances, the definition used
here is one of them; "Ethics is a
practical and normative science
that rationally studies the
goodness and badness of
human acts".
 Ethics is a philosophical Ethics assumes The author focuses more
discipline, and let us remember judgments about the on the study of goodness
that philosophy arises thanks good and bad acts that and evil in human acts.
to man's curiosity to seek can be carried out by Besides considering
answers to disturbing human beings justifying ethics as a direct branch
questions about truth, being, their reasons. of philosophy.
authentic existence.
 It is a philosophical discipline
eminently humanistic and
scientific in nature.
 Ethics is about making
judgments about the moral
goodness or badness of
something, but always giving
the cause or reason for that

Adolfo Sánchez Ethics is the theory or science
Vázquez; Objeto of the moral behavior of men in
de la Ética. society. In other words, it is the
science of a specific form of
human behavior.
Adela Cortina; The word ethics, born from the
What is ethics Greek "ethos", refers to the
really good for? character that we forge as we
mature, in order to fulfill the very
purpose of human life.
judgment.
 Ethics encounters a social- Ethics is derived from The author's approach is
historical experience in the philosophy and is a more scientific and takes
field of morality, that is, with a discipline that should be morality as the object of
series of effective morals taken with the same study.
already given, and starting importance as any other
from them it tries to establish science as well as its
the essence of morality, its propositions in a study.
origin.
 Ethics is the science of
morality, that is, of a sphere of
human conduct. The theory
should not be confused here
with its object: the moral world.
 Ethical propositions must have
the same rigor, coherence and
foundation as scientific
propositions.
 ethics serves to forge a good Ethics has been present The author shares a more
character, which cultivates in societies for a long personal definition and
virtues and keeps away vices, time andas people we differs from the others by
allowing us to be happy and must form our own ethics considering ethics as a
just. in a conscious and critical part of our character that
 moral, from the Latin "mos- way. we must develop.
moris", refers to the character,
customs and usages, but also
to the dwelling in which the
individual lives.
 Ethics deals with "the
formation of the character of
individuals, institutions and
peoples".

Conclusion
The author with whom we agreed was Gustavo Escobar since he specifies that man cannot always decide whether to do things right or
wrong since there are factors that come to affect such action as for example: A lawyer has to do everything to defend his client no
matter what he is saying whether it is true or false, we must think of all the people who lie for their own good another example a mother
has a thief son she will not want her daughter to go to jail even when he is guilty of committing a crime depends on his "morals" another
mother may be willing to give her son even though she knows she will never see him again. Ethics is everywhere and although most
people know what is good or bad, most people do good or bad depending on their favor, although this may seem a lie it is true, people
lie in order to get a better job, they do things they should not be allowed to do in order to have a better job or a raise, society is adapting
you to what you should do and what not, people who supposedly are faithful to ethics even fall into temptation to do evil, corruption
today is more common than in the past, life is adapting and the ethical part is gradually being forgotten, little by little it is
adapting.Corruption today is more common than in other times, life is adapting and the ethics part is being forgotten little by little, it is
adapting, changing to people's opinion, we could not say that ethics is the same as it was several years ago, but it is still the same as it
was several years ago, and it is still the same as it was several years ago.We could not say that ethics is the same as it was several
years ago, and the factors will always change over time and will continue to adapt, each person has a way of thinking and each person
thinks and uses the "ethics" that best suits him, no matter if what he is doing is wrong or right, people will always think that what they
are doing is right even if it is not, and that will continue to adapt. It will continue until there is a real change in the world when people see
what is really good and bad, although that is almost impossible because it would totally change our way of living and doing things as we
do, there are few people who do good because they really want to do good and not just to seek fame or to be someone who is not. The
world is a very complex place more than it seems and you cannot force someone to do good or evil the person decides to do good or
evil although most of the time there are always factors that affect the decisions we make to do evil or good. People will continue with
the same as always until there is a real change, we will never know if what we do is right or wrong, it all depends on the type of "ethics"
that we have been taught, there will never be a single definition of ethics, time will go on and in the future we will see what ethics has
become, let's hope it does not get worse.