BEFORE THE CHAIRMAN BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE &

SECONDARY EDUCATION, MULTAN.

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

M. Sharif S/o Fateh Muhammad, caste Jat, R/o 255 RB Tehsil &
District Faisalabad.
Appellant
Versus

1. Chairman Discipline Committee, B.I.S.E. Multan.

2. Controller of Examination, B.I.S.E. Multan.

3.
Respondents

Appeal U/s against the order passed by

the respondent No. 1 and intimated through
Assistant Controller, Discipline, on behalf of
respondent No. 2 vide letter No.
637/Discipline dated 1.8.2001.

Claim in Appeal: -
To set aside the decision of respondent No. 1,
quash the charges levelled against appellant
and result of appellant may please be restored.
Court Fee: -
Usual fee Rs. 500/- is deposited vide challan
No. dated . Challan is enclosed.
Respectfully Sheweth: -
1. That the appellant was a candidate for Nazim from Union
Council No. 148, District Faisalabad. One Mian Zia-ul-Haq
son of Choudhary Abdul Waheed, caste Arain, resident of
Chak No. 242/RB, Tehsil & District Faisalabad, was an
opposing candidate of the appellant. At the time of scrutiny,
the said Mian Zia-ul-Haq submitted an objection petition
before the Returning Officer that the Secondary School
Certificate of the appellant is a bogus one. This application
was duly entertained by the Returning Officer and Board of
Intermediate & Secondary Education, Multan was directed to
provide relevant information in this regard till 5.5.2001. On
this direction, the B.I.S.E. verified the Secondary School
Certificate of appellant as genuine and objection petition was
rejected on 5.5.2001 by the Returning Officer. The said
Mian Zia-ul-Haq did not assail this matter or order dated
5.5.2001 before any competent court/forum. So, the order
dated 5.5.2001 attained finality.

2. That the appellant was declared a returned candidate as Nazim

from Union Council No. 148, District Faisalabad. It is a usual
practice in the Punjab that the elections are always leaving
sore happenings along-with a revengeful behaviour. The
appellant became the victim of the same deep-rooted enmity
when the said Mian Zia-ul-Haq maneuvered to tamper with
the record of admission form in respect of the appellant, in
association with his some relatives/employees of B.I.S.E.
Multan including one Shahid (Steno-typist) who remained
present with the discipline committee. After hatching this
conspiracy, the said Mian Zia-ul-Haq again filed a complaint
against the appellant in connection with unfair
means/impersonation.

3. That the respondent No. 1 initiated the necessary proceedings

upon this complaint without determining the status of the
complaint and complainant. It will be an astonishing fact that
 letter No. 504 dated 30.6.2001 was delivered on 28.7.2001 to
the appellant posted on 26.7.2001 by the respondents with
malafide intention and ulterior motive. By this practice of
respondents, the conspiracy was disclosed and the appellant
was faced to challenge the same in the civil court Faisalabad.
The learned court was kind enough to grant an interim relief
till 31.7.2001 by restraining the respondent not to act upon the
said letter.

4. That the appellant explored the matter and it came to the

knowledge of the appellant that the said complaint was fixed
for hearing on 30.7.2001. The appellant appeared before the
respondents and submitted the copy of interim relief granted
by the civil court Faisalabad. Resultantly, the appellant was
informed that the proceedings of the complaint would remain
in abeyance till the proceedings in civil court. The
representatives of respondents appeared before the civil court
Faisalabad on 31.7.2001. The interim relief granted to the
appellants could not be extended on 31.7.2001. The
respondents without informing the appellant restarted the
proceedings.

5.