Freedom Veronica Chapman

Ireedom
Is More 1han
Just A 7-Letter Word
a book by Veronica: o the Chapman amily
!!!"#$%&'"()*
+),-*"#$%&'"()*
as in
IreeMan-On-1he-Land
Ireedom Is More 1han Just A 7-Letter Word
his book is all about reedom. I think it will surprise you how
much you actually do not know about that subject. And how ery
little, in essence, you really need to know in order to attain it. 1
I hope that, by the time you hae read it all the way through, your path
into the uture will be obious to you. \ou should discoer that, een at
the age o years old, you had more power than any Goernment,
Judiciary, Police lorce and Military combined. But you did not realise it.
And thereore, throughout your lie, you hae thrown it away. But take
heart, it is still there. And you can learn how to use it.
Ater haing read the Chapters on 1a/ivg and Move,, you may be
wondering why you paid a price or a copy o this book. 1he answer is
pretty obious. 1he Monetary Belie System is still 'king', howeer much
one would wish it away. Suice to say, the majority o that price was the
production, printing and any postage costs. As the Author, my royalty has
been reduced to the barest minimum, in order to keep down the oerall
cost. Consequently, in that respect, it orms a labour o loe on my part.
\hat is worth more than all the gold in the world is your appreciation
that, haing read this book, you hae become empowered in the way you
always should hae been - had you been educated, rather than
indoctrinated - during your childhood.
I apologise, up ront, or the use o word-stressing in the text o this
book. I'm compelled to do that in order to attempt to oercome the
ingrained indoctrination to which we hae all been subject throughout our
lies. And the lies o our ancestors liing or now deceased. I only hae
'the printed word' ,in its arious orms, at my disposal.
Please also note that, i you wish, you may quote any part o this book
under one restriction only: 1hat you quote exactly as is and within
context ... because I cannot be held responsible i you should misquote
me.
One inal thing. Please don`t worry about the grammar or the style. It`s
written exactly the way the Author wanted it written. I know that, because
I`m that Author.
Veronica: o the Chapman amily,
June 2009, leltham, UK.
!
I dedicate this book to eeryone in the lreedom
Moement, without whom ,and without whose
support, writing it would not hae been possible.
You are heroes. You are heroines.
And you know who you are.
Rea.ov i. tbe tife of tbe tar; va,, tbe covvov tar it.etf
i. votbivg et.e bvt rea.ov. 1be tar rbicb i. erfectiov of
rea.ov
Sir Ldward Coke, Lord Chie Justice o Lngland
1552-1634.
Corrvtiov i. vot tbe robtev. t`. tbe acceptance of
corrvtiov tbat`. robtev
Patrick Rattigan ND.
;v.t .a, rbat .a, becav.e erer,ove i. evtittea to v,
oiviov
Saire: o the Llder amily ,aged ,.
I write this book for Yana, and Saffire, and all
the little ones like them. And I thank Yana's
mother for the cover design.
"
Contents
Ioreword S
Chapter J: 1aking 8
Chapter 2: Money JJ
Chapter 3: Legalese 2J
Chapter 4: Religion 26
Chapter S: Global Llite/Psychopaths 28
Chapter 6: Promises & Contracts 34
Chapter 7: Honour, Dishonour & Noticing 38
Chapter 8: Societies & Statutes 4J
Chapter 9: Common Law, 1he Law-of-the-Land 4S
Chapter J0: Notices, Invitations & Summonses 48
Chapter JJ: Legal Iiction Person S0
Chapter J2: Solicitors, Lawyers & Notaries S3
Chapter J3: Veronica's Very Cunning 2-Step Plan for Ireedom S6
Chapter J4: 1he Principles of the Application of Common Law S8
Chapter JS: Iundamental Lstablished Axioms 60
Chapter J6: Signatures 67
Chapter J7: Courts & Proceedings 68
Chapter J8: Liability & 1he Ultimate Sanctions 7S
Chapter J9: 1he Law-of-Waters 78
Chapter 20: Names 83
Chapter 2J: Orders 8S
Chapter 22: Laws, Regulations, Guidelines & Sovereignty 86
Chapter 23: 1he Hive Mind 90
Chapter 24: Mass Mind Control & Lnslavement 92
Lpilogue J00
Appendix A: 1emplates & Usage Disclaimer J02
Appendix B: Ireedom of Information interactions with HM
1reasury JJS
Appendix C: Magna Carta J2JS J39
Appendix D: Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of
Right JS2
#
Ioreword
Foreword
am not a Solicitor. I am not a Lawyer. I am not an Accountant. I am
not an Lconomist. I am not, in any way 'legally-trained', nor am I
qualiied to pontiicate on 'monetary or economic policy'. It is hoped
that, i you read this book all the way through, you will be ery glad I am
none o those things.
I
So, what are my qualiications \ell, I hae some academic ones ,in
engineering,, but they are not directly releant to the undamental
messages contained in these pages. 1hey do proide me with a
background in 'working things out', but that`s all.
My undamental qualiication or writing this book, my primary one, is
that I am a luman Being. Blessed with a liing soul. Just like you. And
that`s the only qualiication I need or writing this book, and the only
qualiication you need or reading it. And, I hope, or understanding it.
I beliee I hae Common Sense. I beliee you do, as well. I beliee
that`s all that`s actually necessary. I beliee that, by simply tapping into
your Common Sense, we will end up in complete agreement.
I certainly hope so.
Lerything stated in this book is either based on my own personal
experiences, or on the experiences o people I know and trust. And it`s all
based on Common Sense anyway. It really is just the practical application
o Common Sense, as you will see.
So where do we start
\ell, irst o all I`d like to quote Mahatma Gandhi when he said: 1bere
i. vo atb to eace . eace tbe atb.
Is it, thereore, OK i I say: 1bere i. vo atb to freeaov . freeaov tbe
atb I reckon it`s OK to say that. Because it`s true.
\hoa! \hat does that mean \ell it means that to be ree - you hae
to be ree. And nothing else will do.
I hae deised a Very Cunning 2-Step Plan to achiee reedom. I
expand on this in more detail, in a Chapter all o its own. But,
undamentally, the two steps are:
1. \ou are ree because you say you are ree. Because no-one else will
say it or you.
2. 1he second step is to make sure eeryone you encounter recognises
Step One.
$
It sounds easy, but obiously it isn`t. In act een Step One is extremely
hard because it takes a constant eort to hold the line. 1his line has to be
held 24,. lor example, most people in the British Isles, will say: Of
covr.e `v free! tire iv a aevocrac,, aov`t . bare freeaov of .eecb, aov`t .
\ell, the straight answers to that are: ô, ô and: ô.
I`ll add one more quotation, rom 18th,19th century philosopher
Johann \olgang on Goethe: 1bo.e vo.t boete..t, ev.tarea are tbo.e rbo
fat.et, betiere tbe, are free.
And that`s the nub. Or maybe you could say, the rub. Is one`s belie in
one`s reedom alse or true Is one really ree, or hopelessly enslaed
1here`s a pretty simple test. Do you think something. something that
happens ,or has happened, to you, is ,or was, unair And you can`t see
how to put it right It doesn`t matter what it is . but: Dia it baev to
,ov, ra. it vvfair, ava ra. tbere rer, tittte ,ov covta ao abovt it I the answer to
that question is: Ye., then you are hopelessly enslaed.
ley! Don`t worry! Plenty o that has happened to me! loweer, by the
time youè read this book, I hope you will be in the position o knowing
'how to put it right'. ,Not necessarily how you can right wrongs done to
you in the past, but how to preent wrongs happening to you & your
loed ones in the uture,.
Because, generally speaking, we all understand the dierence between
right and wrong. \e are built that way. It`s called Common Sense. \e
just eel it, more oten than not. But, just because we are only eeling it,
doesn`t mean that we can, or should, ignore such eelings.
Because within them lies the truth.
Listen: I`m anxious to get on with what I plan to say. And I`m sure you
eel the same way. All ired up and raring to go! So, haing laid just a little
bit o groundwork, let`s quickly moe on to the irst Chapter.
low does that sound
OK, well just a couple o inal things beore we can do that, because I
just need to say, in order to ully comprehend the purpose behind this
book, the Reader needs to be amiliar with the works o other writers,
such as Daid Icke, Jordan Maxwell, ,the late, great, \illiam Cooper,
Lustace Mullins and G. Ldward Griin etc. I you are not, then I suggest
you make up or it as soon as you possibly can. Neertheless it is assumed
that you know, deep down in your soul, that: ovetbivg i. rrovg ritb tbe .et
v into which you were born.
\riters such as Daid & Jordan & others explain what those
'somethings' are in ery great detail. And, i you know what those
%
Ioreword
'somethings' are, then you`ll ully understand why I`m writing this book.
loweer, i you don`t know what those 'somethings' are, then we will just
hae to soldier on as best we can. Regardless. And simply rely on your
'basic, gut, eelings'. ,I think it will all work out in the end,.
Perhaps the ery irst thing to do is to start at the beginning ,always a
good place, Iè discoered!,. It will probably be a little bit o a surprise,
but the irst thing I do is to analyse the word: 1ake ,including its
deriaties,.
And the reason or that, as you will see, is that it all starts rom there.
Veronica: o the Chapman amily,
June 2009, leltham, UK.
&
Chapter 1: Taking
uh Just 'taking' is wrong, isn`t it 1aking is 'greedy', isn`t it
People are wrong to just take! Scroungers, tax dodgers . the lot
o em! I can`t stand people who think it is OK to just take!
\hat right do they think they hae to do that lair`s air! And just taking
isn`t air! I worked hard or what I hae!
l
Lrrr . 'scuse me. Just a moment. Can I interrupt, just one moment
Please Pretty please
1hanks.
\hat was the irst thing you did when you were born
Most people will say: .creavea v, beaa off, .o v, votber .aia!
\ell, no way, I`m araid. Beore you could scream you must hae
taken a breath. And, what`s more, you continue to take breaths
throughout your entire lie.
Does the atmosphere eer send you a bill Such that you pay it - or all
the breaths you take It would be a bit o a nuisance i it did that,
wouldn`t it
Do you drink water \here does it come rom Do you expect to pay
back the sky, or all the rainall you took - and drank
\here does the light & heat come rom Do you expect the Sun to be
paid back or all the light and heat you took rom it, throughout your lie
Do you expect an inoice, rom the Sun, to land on your doormat one
ine day
\here do you get your minerals rom Oh! 1he Larth! \es, o course!
Does 1he Larth send out inoices, asking or payment or all the minerals
taken rom it ,in your name,
\ell, no. People and Companies send inoices, but the atmosphere,
the Sun & the Larth don`t bother doing such an absurd thing.
We take everything. We have to. 1here is no other way. 1he
alternatie is death.
And we are not alone in this. Lery single lie orm - rom the lowliest
amoeba to the grandest specimen o lomo Sapiens ,i.e. you,, does the
same thing. 1hat includes all animals, ish, reptiles, plants . eerything
organic.
'
1aking
\hat, in point o act, do we ,lie orms, gie back \aste. Sewage.
Pollution. ,I can`t think o anything else, on the physical leel. \ith the
exception o pollution, we do, ater taking, actually contribute to the Lie
Cycle o the planet, in terms o the carbon dioxide we exhale, the organic
waste we excrete, and the waste materials we leae behind when we die.
loweer the point is that we hae to take, in the irst place, in order to
lie,. 1here is no dishonour whatsoever in 'taking', provided you do
not take more than your fair share.
1he dishonour comes - or at least came - when certain amilies
,historically, elbowed their way to the ront o the queue, thrusting all
others out o their way, and said: 1 . M^! rer,ove et.e .oa
off!. 1hat's dishonour.
1aking just what you need, no more, no less, is air, reasonable, right,
just and honourable. Because your only other option is death.
Scroungers, eh \ell scroungers actually ask permission, generally
speaking: `re, vate, gi..acvta qvia, ritt ,a. .. Cor, fav/., vate! Yov`re a
btooa, aiavova!.
Now, sit back and imagine something. Imagine a world in which
eeryone ,that`s eeryone!, just took. Just took what they needed,
wheneer they needed it. Just what they needed, no more, no less.
No, don`t laugh. 1ry to imagine it. It`s really important. It is what is
going to set us ree.
lere`s a quick example. 1he larmer grows wheat. 1he Miller just takes
the wheat, and grinds it into lour. 1he Baker just takes the lour, and
bakes it into bread. 1he larmer and the Miller just take the bread and eat
it. 1he Baker eats his own bread. All three surie.
Now that was a ery simplistic example, just to make the point.
Obiously one has to expand that example to encompass all walks o lie,
but that can be done. loweer, certain 'walks o lie' - those that are not
in any way productie, would disappear. 1hey would become obious
under a 'moneyless' paradigm. ,Basically it would be eeryone who you
currently accept, grudgingly, as: !ett, .vo.e tbe, are ;v.t aoivg tbeir ;ob,
1he undamental point is: 1hat example is precisely what is happening
already. 1he only actor let out o that example was 'money'. Or should I
say 'methods o payment'
So, how would that work without 'money,payments' \ell it would, I
can assure you. Once again, I`m haing to leae the detail until later,
because I don`t want to oerload your Common Sense at this point.
Just keep reading. 1his whole book. All will be explained.
(
All I want to achiee, at this point, is that Common Sense tells you
there is no dishonour, nothing to be ashamed o, in taking whateer you
need, because you hae no alternatie. 1hat nature proides or
eerything you need, and there is no alternatie to nature. And Common
Sense tells you that the larmer, Miller & Baker would surie in that
example.
So I guess the next stage, in order to lesh out the situation in which we
ind ourseles, is to recognise three ery powerul Grand Deceptions,
which hae together suppressed many people`s ability to listen to their
own Common Sense.
So, let`s make a start with . with what \ell, we hae three choices:
'Money', 'Legalese' and 'Religion'.
1hey are all Grand Deceptions, so let`s start with 'Money'.
)*
Money
Chapter 2: Money
he irst Grand Deception is 'money'. It's an illusion. But, my
goodness, a powerul one! 1his is probably the hardest part to
understand. So I am going to hae to explain as careully as I can. 1
\ell, what is 'money' Most people will think o a _10 or _20 note, and
say: 1bat. vove, of covr.e!
And the problem is: 1hat's not money, o course. 1hey are just pieces
o paper, with a design printed on them, and a splash o siler-coloured
ink.
lundamentally people know that, coinage is not 'worth' the 'alue'
stamped on it i.e. coins cost peanuts to make. And banknotes the same.
Surely no-one really beliees it actually costs _5 to create a ier Or _10
to make a tenner And so on
I plead to your Common Sense! I prostrate mysel, and groel, at the
eet o your Common Sense!
So, i 'money' is 'not worth the paper it is printed on', what, exactly, is it
worth
Perhaps one answer to that can be gained by deining it. \hat is the
deinition o money` lere's Chambers Online:
money: noun (plural in sense Jb and 4 monies or moneys) J a
coins or banknotes used as a means of buying things, b any
currency used as legal tender. 2 wealth in general.
\rong! Let's see i a Law Dictionary can be o more help. lere's
Black's 8th edition:
money: J. 1he medium of exchange authorised or adopted by a
government as part of its currency, esp. domestic currency <coins
and currency are money> UCCJ-20J (b) (24) 2. Assets that can be
easily converted into cash <demand deposits are money> 3. Capital
that is invested or traded as a commodity <the money market> 4.
Iunds, sums of money <investment monies>
\rong! And, not only that, I loe the way ,4, deines money as 'sums
o money'. 1hat's known as a Circular Deinition.
1hese are wrong because they deine 'cash', not 'money'. 1hat's the
same thing, is it \ell then, how come there is always talk about: ...
beaaivg for a ca.bte.. .ociet, And the beneits o it I'e neer heard any
))
mention o: ... beaaivg for a vove,te.. .ociet, in the Mainstream Media. As
you will see, i you read on, the 'moneyless society' is the one we need,
and ,I beliee, we are going to get - or the simple reason that we can't go
on or much longer under the absurd and preposterous illusion o money.
And ar too many people are waking up to that. 1here are a number o
ery serious proposals or working 'moneyless societies', such as the
Resource-based Lconomy proposed by the Venus Project.
My deinition o 'money' is, I think you will ind, a lot more accurate.
lere's me:
money: Conveniently transportable tokens of Credit.
Isn't that the same thing, then Absolutely not! Let's examine my
deinition.
\ell, irst o all, 'coneniently' and 'transportable' are adjecties.
1hereore all they do is to limit the scope o the subject o the deinition.
1ake 'red' as an example. I I said: .tt car., then I would mean eery
single car on the planet. I I added the adjectie 'red' as: .tt rea car., I
would not be talking about cars o a dierent colour, I would only be
reerring to the red ones. But I would still be talking about 'cars'.
So, the adjecties do nothing more than limit the scope o the subject,
which, in the case o 'money', is: 'tokens o Credit'.
\es, 'cash' is nothing more than tokens. \e hae already seen, by
Common Sense, that the coins and banknotes - the cash - is
undamentally worthless. It has no more alue, in reality, than tokens or a
lruit Machine. Or Green Shield Stamps ,i you can remember those,.
Perhaps Supermarket Vouchers is a more up-to-date example
\hat is a 'token' A token is something real, something substantial in
this 5-sense reality, something that can be touched, held, elt . that
stands in place o - in other words represents - something that cannot
represent itsel.
A table does not need a token to represent it. A table is real, and can
represent itsel. A chair likewise. And so on.
1he thing that cannot represent itsel is 'credit'. Because 'credit' is
nothing more than an idea. A concept. Imaginary. A belief.
A belie that a Shopkeeper has, such that i he swaps some goods or a
_10 note, then he can use that _10 note at a later date, to make a swap
with someone else.
But this mechanism only works because eeryone concerned beliees
it. ,And only because o that,
)!
Money
I say again: Because they beliee it. And where are belies kept \es, in
your head. In your brain. In your imagination.
And that's the only place belies are kept.
So the idea that 'money' is real . is an illusion. A Monetary System is
nothing more than a Belie System.
1hat's why, throughout the world, Belie Systems can be dierent.
1here was a time, not so long ago, when the Germans belieed in
deutschmarks, and the lrench belieed in rancs, and the British belieed
in pounds sterling.
At the time o writing the British still beliee in pounds sterling, while
the lrench and Germans now beliee in Luros. 1his is only possible
with a Belief System.
1he British, lrench, Germans, Dutch, Italians, etc. all still know that a
table is a table, and a chair is always a chair. And what to do with them.
\e don't need to beliee in tables & chairs or that to be the case.
So, what is a banknote, or a coin \ell British banknotes gie the game
away, because they actually contain a printed promise. It goes like this:
"I PROMISL 1O PAY 1HL BLARLR ON DLMAND 1HL
SUM OI .". and then ollowed by the amount written numerically
,known as the 'denomination' o the note, _5, _10, _20 or example,.
,1here is obiously not enough space or similar inscriptions on
coinage,.
\hat does this mean It's a promise. 1hus a banknote is a Promissory
Note. A piece o paper containing a promise. And bearing the signature o
whomsoeer is making the promise.
Anyone in their right mind would call it an IOU.
So, the British are passing around IOUs, rom the Bank o Lngland,
24,.
Do we eer expect the Bank o Lngland to pay up, to make good, on
their promise
Actually, at least one person I know about, did try. 1he Bank o
Lngland quickly showed her the door ,and called the Police!,. Someone
else I know tried the same thing at Barclay's. Once again she was also
shown the door ,which, by the way, was locked and bolted immediately
ater she let!,
\ell, i you think the Bank o Lngland will make good on their
promise, then eel ree to try. I ery much doubt you will succeed where
)"
others hae ailed, or the simple reason that the Bank o Lngland cannot
ulill on a Belie System.
1he Promissory Notes the British moe around 24, are nothing more
than empty, meaningless, IOUs.
And they call it 'money'. And wars are ought oer it. People die, and
are subjected to atrocities or it. People commit suicide oer it. In point o
act just about eery cide` ,genocide, patricide, homicide, suicide, etc., is
committed in the name o empty, meaningless, promises.
IOUs by any other name.
1his would all stop on the day that what I'e written herein is
recognised as the truth, and Common Sense.
Is it such a large step, by the way, to see how these empty, meaningless,
promises can be conerted to numbers in computer databases, and
implants on plastic cards
lurthermore is it such a large step to imagine that we could run a world
quite well, without the need to sling empty, meaningless, promises all oer
the shop
Ater all, the Luro notes don't een bother to make the promise,
because the whole thing is so utterly worthless and superluous. I'm airly
sure that, i the Bank O Lngland's notes said: PROM 1O P.Y
1 .RR O^ DM.^D : |^COR^, and so on, people
would start to cotton on. By saying: cv.e ve, bvt rbat tbe bett i. tbe gooa of
: v,tbicat creatvre... \ell, o course, the Bank o Lngland's current
promises are actually mythical creatures.
People say: !itbovt vove,, tbere rovta be vo ivcevtire for av,ove to ao
av,tbivg. \hat a terribly myopic thought! 1ry sitting around, doing
nothing, or any period o time. I submit you would be climbing the walls
looking or something to do.
Something constructie to do.
\ell, you need to eat, don't you So, at the ery least you would need
to: Cet v off ,ovr bvv, ava go get .ove fooa. And the same or your
children, etc. 1hat may not be oerly constructie to the good o the
community in general, but it is an incentie. And it is an incentie that
does not need to be triggered by money. ,It's triggered by hunger,
Just about eery example one can think o can be thought through
rationally, in much the same way. It just needs to be thought about
careully, that's all. It is no good hal-thinking. Only whole-thinking will
return the correct conclusions.
)#
Money
Go back to the example o the larmer, Miller & Baker. \hy does that
example need to include the necessity to hand around empty, meaningless,
IOUs rom the Bank o Lngland, or that example to work
\hen all they actually need to do, is to say: oa it. !ett ;v.t ao it!. I
think you`ll ind the reason is pretty obious. 1he larmer, Miller & Baker
are in a real situation. Adding a component called 'method o payments' is
only adding belies to that reality. 1his belie contributes nothing
whatsoeer to the actions taken by the larmer, Miller & Baker. 1hey
could arm, mill & bake without any knowledge . other than arming,
milling & baking. Subtracting the belies rom the reality is subtracting
zero rom the oerall equation. Subtracting zero rom either side o an
equation leaes the resulting balance unchanged.
\hat's the dierence between: /vor it ror/.. cav .ee it ror/.. tbiv/,
betiere it ror/. tbi. ra,, and: /vor it ror/.. cav .ee it ror/. Answer:
ôtbivg. otb .a, eactt, tbe .ave tbivg, in fact. It's just that, in the ormer
case, the added belie may - or may not - be correct. But that doesn`t
matter, because it`s only a belie, anyway . and therefore totally
discardable.
Duh! \ou don't need to barter, baby, you just need to 'do
it' ,honourably contribute,! Sheesh!
\hat right does some private banking cartel ,the Bank o Lngland,
hae to say only its empty, meaningless, promises are the ones to use
\hy are its empty, meaningless, promises so much better than some
empty, meaningless, promise o yours Or better than those real promises
the larmer, Miller and Baker make to each other
I the larmer suddenly ups and says: ô, ,ov cavt bare av, vore rbeat,
then the Miller can say: v tbat ca.e cavt va/e av, ftovr, ava tbe a/er cavt
va/e av, breaa, ava tberefore ,ov rovt bare av, breaa to eat. 1hat would not
happen because it would be so blindingly obious. Common Sense.
Money is an illusion. Based on empty, meaningless, promises rom the
Bank o Lngland in the UK, and the lederal Resere ,yet another private
banking cartel, in the US.
,I you are reading this somewhere else in the world, don't worry . it's
exactly the same where you are located. 1he Grand Deception, the
illusion o 'money', is the same throughout the world,. \ho says so ler
Majesty's 1reasury say so. In reply to a lreedom o Inormation Request I
made. ,See Appendix B or details,.
I`ll be returning to this subject later, when I discuss Mind Control and
Lnslaement. Because the Monetary System is one o the primary
mechanisms or Mass Mind Control and Lnslaement.
)$
loweer, in the meanwhile, here are a ew things to consider in odd
moments, as you may read on in this book.
1hink about this.
Light. \here does it come rom It doesn`t take much imagination to
know that daylight comes rom the Sun.
So, without going into to the deep science o the situation, we can
reely say that: 1be vv i. tbe .ovrce of att ovr aa,tigbt.
leat. \e can say a similar thing or heat that warms our planet. It
comes rom the Sun.
\ater. 1hat comes rom the sky, drops as rain, and eentually
eaporates back into the sky again. In a cycle. But where did the original
water come rom Once again, no real science is inoled in the answer. It
has been there since the planet was ormed.
1he point o this explanation is: 1be.e tbivg. bare av vttivate .ovrce . for
racticat vro.e., av,ra,.
And a little thought says that eerything must come rom somewhere.
Lerything has to hae an ultimate source, or practical purposes.
And so it must be that money has an ultimate source, does it not
I so, what is that ultimate source lae you eer thought about it
Does it grow on trees Does it come rom the Sun Does it drop like
rainall
\ell, no, it doesn`t. Leryone understands that.
So where does it come rom, then
Ask anyone where their money comes rom, and they will generally
reply: ror/, to earv it`. So you can then ask: vt rbo gire. it to ,ov., and
they will say: 1be Covav, ror/ for, of covr.e!.
1hen you can ask: !bere aoe. tbe Covav, ,ov ror/ for get it frov, .o tbat it
ba. .ove to a, orer to ,ov., and they will say: !ett, tbe, .ett gooa. to
Cov.vver., or tbe, roriae .errice. to Cov.vver. . ava tbe, cbarge for it. o tbat`.
bor tbe, get tbeir vove,.
And so you can say: !ett, rbere ao tbe.e Cov.vver. get tbeir vove, frov, .o
a. to a, for tbe.e gooa. c .errice.., and the answer will come back: !ett,
tbe, ror/ for otber Covavie. . rbo a, tbev for tbe ror/ tbe, ao! Cor! .re ,ov
aaft, or .ovetbivg..
So now we are just going round and round, aren`t we \e hae still not
established the ultimate source o where money comes rom, in the irst
place.
)%
Money
Probing a little deeper, an answer might be: M, Covav, get. it frov a
av/, .vo.e. So then it is possible to ask: !ett, rbere aoe. tbe av/ get it
frov, tbev..
And then you`ll possibly get: !ett, .vo.e tbe av/. vv.t va/e it .
aov`t /vor!.
So you can then say: !ett, if tbe av/. va/e it, tbev rb, ao tbe, eect ,ov
- if ,ov ta/e ovt a toav - to a, tbev bac/. veav, if tbe, cav ;v.t va/e it av,ra,.
.va rb, aia tbe, veea a baitovt of it, iv tate 200. .va rb, aia av/. go ovt of
bv.ive.., if tbe, cav ;v.t va/e vove,..
And you are ery likely to end up with the retort: !ett, aov`t /vor!
../ tbev!.
1o which the obious rejoinder is: !ett, ao ,ov vot tbiv/ it rovta bet ,ov
to /vor. ecav.e, if ,ov aia - /vor rbere it cave frov, veav - tbev va,be - ;v.t
va,be - ,ov covta go ava get .ove . to bet ,ov orer av, vove, robtev. ,ov vigbt
bare. are ,ov verer baa av, vove, robtev.. Mo.t eote bare. Do ,ov vot tbiv/
tbat /vorivg rbere vove, actvatt, cove. frov, iv tbe fir.t tace, vigbt bet ,ov..
1he response will probably be: avvvo.
And that`s the point. Who, precisely, knows where money actually
comes from? In the first place?
Who knows how it gets into circulation?
So let`s look around or the possible sources.
My next door neighbour No . he`s in the same trouble as I am.
My employer No . weè already been through that.
1he Banks \ell, no . at least not most o them . but there is the
Bank o Lngland, and that doesn`t go out o business, did not need a
bailout, and its name is printed on eery banknote. So they are a distinct
possibility. Let`s keep them in mind.
\hat about lM Reenue & Customs No . they want money, so
they can`t be the source o it.
1he DVLA No . they also want money, so they can`t be the source.
1he Local Councils No . they also want money.
1he Goernment \ell, yes this is possible. But one o the
Goernment Agencies is called lM Reenue & Customs, and they want
money. So that`s a bit strange, isn`t it
Now there is a Goernment Agency that neer asks or money. I
wonder i there is something in that 1he Agency in question is located in
lorse Guards Road, London. It is called lM 1reasury.
)&
lae you eer receied a demand rom lM 1reasury I haen`t, in my
entire lie.
So how does lM 1reasury operate, without demanding money with
menaces
1hat`s a question, surely
And it can be shown that the Bank o Lngland is also a priate Bank,
just like RBS, lSBC, Barclay's, etc. So they should be in the same
position, needing a bailout.
But, what the priately-owned Bank o Lngland has, in its aour -
which none o the others hae - is the ability to print money.
A privately-owned Bank, with the ability to print money. 1hat's an
interesting situation to be in, o course.
But that`s only printing it. It still doesn`t explain how these printed
notes, and minted coins, actually get into circulation.
\e know that someone does not stand in 1hreadneedle Street, with a
bucketul o it, and hand it out to passers-by. \e also know that they
don`t hire an aircrat and bail it out, letting it loat down to whomsoeer
can catch it.
But we also know that we neer receie demands rom lM 1reasury,
the Bank o Lngland, nor the Royal Mint.
And we also know that we do receie demands rom just about
eeryone else.
So, I think, we hae some clues to suggest that money is created by
lM 1reasury, printed by the Bank o Lngland in accordance with
instructions rom lM 1reasury, and minted by the Royal Mint under
similar instructions rom lM 1reasury. And that it is released into
circulation ia a mechanism we hae not been told about ,as yet,.
Does anyone hae a better idea
Because money must come rom somewhere, and I think I hae
eliminated most o the other possibilities.
So now lets turn to the strangeness` o lM Reenue & Customs. In
conjunction with lM 1reasury. 1hey are both 'lM's, which stands or
'ler Majesty`s', o course.
So, een i lM 1reasury is not the ultimate source o money, some
'lM' must be.
Let`s assume it is lM 1reasury. ,Ater all, what else is their job, then,.
)'
Money
So we would hae lM 1reasury making money, and lM Reenue &
Customs wanting money. So why can't these two 'HM's just get
together . and leave us all alone?
\ell, that`s another question, isn`t it
And then we can add that one o the jobs o the US 1reasury,
embodied in the Act creating it, was to 'issue warrants or monies'. Or, to
put it another way, to proide authority or the creation o US currency.
And then, add to that, the UK Currency Act deines the weights and
measures or coins, and also proides or the Chancellor o the
Lxchequer to apply an upper limit as to how much currency can be
authorised into circulation.
1he biggest problem is that lM 1reasury will not admit to any
substantial role in respect to the 'creation o money'.
loweer, when asked point blank, HM 1reasury will not go on
the record denying it.
So that's interesting as well, isn't it
\hy would they be so coy
By the time you hae read this book all the way through, I think you
will be in possession o a complete set o the most probable answers to all
these questions. Answers that it, what we all know to be true, like the
pieces o a perect jigsaw puzzle. Including the mechanism or releasing
money into circulation in a controlled manner, and why eeryone
concerned would be so coy about the roles they play.
It might be interesting to consider 'what goes away' when 'the Belie
System, the Illusion o Money, goes away'.
\hat does it take with it
Stealing is the irst thing. 1here is nothing to steal. loarding is another
thing. 1here is no point in hoarding, any more than there is any point in
stealing anything. 'Buy', 'sell', 'commerce', 'barter' and 'debt' no longer
hae any meaning. And so on.
1he Global Llite ,see their own Chapter, are now seen to be as
worthless as they -in point o act - always were. 1heir Swiss Bank
Accounts now count or nothing whatsoeer.
Goodbye to the Stock Markets. Goodbye to the Banks. Goodbye to
the Loan Sharks. Goodbye to the Debt Collectors. And so on.
'Rich' now becomes 'rich in good riends'. 'Rich in honour'. 'Rich in
integrity'. And so on.
)(
Just like it always should hae been.
!*
Legalese
Chapter 3: Legalese
'm going to discuss the Lnglish ersion o Legalese. Lery nation on
the planet will hae its own ersion. ,lor reasons which, I hope, will
become obious,. 1he same discussion and comments will apply.
Because there is no other way.
I
Legalese is the language o Statutes. It is assumed that Statutes are 'the
Law'. 1hey are not, as you will see i you keep reading. Statutes are
discussed within their own Chapter.
lor now, I simply want to conine the discussion to Legalese itsel. 1o
show that it is an illusion. Another arm o the Grand Deception.
1here is an old Roman Law maxim that states: et be rbo ritt be
aeceirea, be aeceirea.
1hat is so, so true.
\hat, exactly, is Legalese \ell, irst o all it is a language. It looks like
Lnglish ,in the British Isles,, but it is no more 'Lnglish' than is any
loreign Language. lrench, or example. Or German. Or Croatian.
It is written by those who draw up Bills or Parliament ,and Congress,.
It is assessed by Committees. It is oted on by Members o Parliament ,or
Congress,. I agreed it becomes an Act o Parliament ,or Congress,. It
becomes so-called 'law' when it receies the Royal ,or Presidential,
Assent. At that point it becomes a Statute. A Statute written in Legalese.
A Statute written in a loreign Language.
Now, you may be orgien or asking: or cav be eectea to obe, a rvte
rrittev iv a oreigv avgvage. or cav erev be eectea to vvaer.tava rbat av
.vo.ea to obe, a. av vrigbt, tarabiaivg, citiev.
I, personally, would orgie you or asking that. 1hose who won't, are
Members o your Goernment, the Judiciary - in terms o Judges, Clerks,
Solicitors, Lawyers, Barristers, and Policemen. And the ast majority o
your ellow Countrymen, quite probably including your own amily &
riends. And also including the Media.
But I would orgie you, because you would be exactly right. And so, I
think, would any other sane, rational, honest, honourable and decent
luman Being. Really anyone still capable o using een just a grain o
Common Sense.
!)
Apart rom being a loreign Language ,I'll explain why,, it also
comprises a number o ictions. As we all know 'iction' is not the truth.
'liction' is not the reality ,I'll explain this, as well,
Legalese is a loreign Language because it re-deines or expands the
meanings o certain words. Lnglish words. It does this or its own
conenience ,not yours, that's or sure!,. One good example ,I'll gie you
a better example in a minute, is the word 'understand'. Legalese expands
this to mean 'stand under' - speciically ,as we will see,: tava vvaer, i.e.
cov.evt to, egate.e. So what does this mean It means that i a Policeman,
or anyone in a Court, asks you: Do ,ov vvaer.tava., and you say: Ye.,
then you are agreeing to consent to the application o Statutes drated in a
loreign Language. ,Legalese is nothing i not thoroughly incestuous!,.
lere's the real dooley: In Legalese the word 'person' is re-deined by
expansion. 1he word 'person' still means what you and I would expect it
to mean iz: a luman Being, But in Legalese it is expanded to mean: '...
any grouping o people, any Partnership, any Company,Corporation'.
,I think those who drated this standard or their own conenience,
were assuming that they could moe a word deining a singular, into a
plural . taking their cue rom the act that some Lnglish words are like
that. 'Sheep' and 'ish' are obious examples. loweer, I'm only guessing,
and why they thought they could get away with it doesn't matter anyway,.
1he idea was, o course, to gie Corporations, Companies & Societies
the same or similar 'rights & duties' as a luman Being. An utterly stupid
idea, as I hope you will appreciate, by the time you hae read and ully-
comprehended this book.
So, let's use some Common Sense to look into the sanity o expanding
the deinition o the word 'person'.
A luman Being has a head within which there is a brain, within which
there is - what we would call - a Mind. And a luman Being is 'aware', is
conscious, and has a soul. A luman Being also has eyes, and ears, and
limbs. And so on.
A group o people, taken as a group, has none o these things. 1he
indiiduals that orm the group do ,o course,, but not the group - of
itself i.e. when taken as a legal entity' in it's own right. It does not
matter how much Legalese would like to grow arms & legs on a group, it
cannot happen. It is physically impossible.
A simple example is 'deciding to do something'. A luman Being can
work out what to do ,using the brain,, and do it, using its limbs. A
Corporation has to irstly, go through the motions o making a collectie
!!
Legalese
decision, and then get,persuade,task a luman Being ,e.g. an Authorised
Company Representatie, to actually do whateer has been decided.
More speciically, signing a document. A luman Being has limbs with
which to grasp a pen, and a brain to control the necessary hand
moements, in order to make his or her unique 'mark'. A Company has to
all back on tasking a representatie to make a 'mark' . on behal o the
Company.
\hen it comes to liability or actions taken, a luman Being can be
airly and squarely placed in the rame. In the case o a Company, buck-
passing is the order o the day. Don't expect any luman Being, who is a
part o any Company, to own up to anything!
Consequently, by no stretch, would any sane indiidual consider a
single luman Being to be equialent to a Group.
And that's where Legalese starts. It starts with insanity and irrationality
. and then steadily gets worse. It layers iction ,calling a Company as
'person', upon iction. It creates what is known as a Legal liction Person
rom each and eery luman Being. It does this in order to be able to
ictionally equate a luman Being to a single-indiidual-partnership-or-
CORPORA1ION` or legal purposes`.
1his is done so that any adjudication in a Court de acto ,what that
means is explained later, is One CORPORA1ION .s. Another
CORPORA1ION. Very simply because it is perectly obious that no
adjudication is possible between the reality o a luman being and the
fiction o a CORPORA1ION.
low can anyone eer adjudicate between a reality & and an illusion
1he reality, the 1ruth, would always win against the iction, the Untruth,
hands down!
A Chapter in this book is deoted to egat ictiov Per.ov..
It is also interesting to note that there is an excellent ideo aailable,
called 1be Cororatiov. 1his ideo not only explains how and why
CORPORA1IONs all came about, but goes urther to compare the
actions o any CORPORA1ION to that o the real luman Being it
purports to impersonate.
1he ideo goes into massie detail in order to explore this concept.
And, or that reason, it is highly recommended iewing. And what does it
conclude It concludes that, if a CORPORA1ION (any
CORPORA1ION) were a real person, it would be a psychopath.
And, urthermore, the deinitions change rom time to time. 1hat's why
Black's Law Dictionary is now in its 8th Ldition ,at the time o writing,.
!"
Its 8th Ldition o pure antasy and absurdity.
\ou want some more I`m reliably inormed that i you look up
luman Being` the 4
th
Ldition o Black`s Law Dictionary, it says: See
monster'. Not so, by the time we get to the 8
th
Ldition, o course. It's
a moving carpet.
O course it is perectly possible to step back and use a bit o Common
Sense. 1he ery act that Law Dictionaries are necessary, gies the biggest
hint. In Lnglish we already hae dictionaries to deine our language, in
terms o normal parlance. 1he Oxord Lnglish is probably the best
known, but there are many others. 1hey do not deine the word 'person'
as a Corporation.
Because Legalese is a loreign Language it needs its own dictionary. I it
were not a loreign Language it would not. Languages always need a
dictionary. I we could always rely on Oxord Lnglish then we would,
would we not \hat would be the point o Oxord Lnglish otherwise
Legalese is an illusion. A ictional world created or the beneit o
mind control and enslaement. It is an Lnglish look-alike, and no more
than that. Because it 'looks like Lnglish', no-one complains.
But we should. \e should all complain. \e should all say: 1bi. i.
btooa, riaicvtov.! or aare ,ov ivo.e rvte. to be obe,ea rbev tbe, are rrittev iv a
oreigv tavgvage. Cet ovtta bere!. As you will see later, in the Chapter
discussing Provi.e. c Covtract., the ast majority o the so-called 'Legal
Proession' hae not the slightest clue about all this. \hich means that i
you understand the illusion o Legalese, then you can run rings around
them.
Iè got an idea! Let`s dump Legalese on the Rubbish 1ip o listory,
and stick to Oxord Lnglish, shall we 1hen we`d all know where we
stood, wouldn`t we
I hae seen many examples o letters rom Solicitors, Lawyers, and so-
called 'Legal Scholars', which are a complete mass o double-think. Under
careul and critical scrutiny just about anything they write can be shown to
be totally contradictory, and thoroughly irrational. 1he reason or this is
because they lie in a ictional world, and are always attempting to replace
Common Sense with iction. 1hey achiee little other than disappearing
up their own hindquarters.
1he beneit to you is that you can write plain commonsense, and they
will not understand! 1hey will not understand because Common Sense
does not compute in their ictional, illusory, world.
!#
Legalese
Because they do not understand they will resort to ignoring what you
said, and reply to the-question-they-wanted-you-to-ask. And they will
reply in their own way. ,low oten do Politicians do that low about
like: .tra,.! It's the same old smoke & mirrors,. \hat this means is
that they hae 'not responded in substance' to the points you made. 1hey
could not 'respond in substance' because that would not compute with
their illusion.
Since they hae 'not responded in substance', they hae dishonoured,
and you hae not. In Law: e rbo ai.bovovr., to.e..
Generally speaking, when it comes down to brass tacks, we hae ound
that - or all their huing & puing - they never actually go to Court.
Primarily ,we think, this is because - at the end o the day - they know,
deep down, that your Common Sense trumps their Legalese. lands
down.
One o the biggest questions to arise is: !bat`. tbe aifferevce betreev
tegat` ava tarfvt`.. \ell here is one big clue. 'Legal' reers to the illusory
world o Legalese.
'Lawul' means truly bound by Law ,long established customs &
traditions,, in the real, Common Sense, world. 1he Law established oer
centuries, by consent ,Cov.ev.v. facit tegev in Latin - Cov.evt va/e. ar in
Lnglish,. 1here is much more about this later.
et be rbo ritt be aeceirea, be aeceirea. Don't be deceied.
!$
Chapter 4: Religion
eligion is the third o the illusory triumirate. People wrongly
equate 'spiritual' with 'religious'. \hereas 'religion' is no such
thing. Religion comprises dogma. lor example to tell you that you
need to be 'saed'. And how to be saed.
R
\hen, in point o act, you need to be saed rom three things only:
'Money', 'Legalese', and 'Religion'.
1he imposition o religious dogma is designed to suppress your ability
to use Common Sense. No \ell it does. In order to ollow a religion -
any religion - you hae to be prepared to double-think, to a greater or
lesser degree.
Double-thinking is the antithesis o Common Sense, and any critical
thought processes based on Common Sense.
'Religion' is the third arm o the mind control and enslaement
paradigm. Be as religious as you want. But don't orget that reedom is
reedom. Len i you become ree, with the help o later material in this
book, is there any point in then surrendering any o your gains to any
religion
Once you know what you are, you don`t need anyone else to tell you.
I religion is so empowering, why has no religious person ,to the best
o my knowledge, eer written this book Or anything like it Are you
suggesting that plain unarnished 1ruths, contained within plain old
Common Sense, aren`t worth preaching loud & clear rom eery pulpit
Gosh, no. Religious dogma is ar more important, isn`t it \ou hae all
the power necessary to sae yoursel & your loed ones.
But no ... don`t do that ... let Jesus do it.
Reading Zecharia Sitchin's book 1be 12
tb
Ptavet explains exactly how we
all came to be here, and what 'God' is. Sitchin is an expert on the Biblical
Old 1estament, is luent in lebrew, and can read the original lebrew
ersions o Ancient 1exts. le explains how 'God' occasionally moes into
the plural - i.e. 'Gods' - by reerring to 'we' and 'our', etc.
1hese are possibly transcription mistakes rom the 1ruth contained in
the Ancient Sumerian 1ablets. Or they could ery well be deliberate
mistakes, let in by the Ancient Scribes ,who were quite probably re-
writing history at sword-point,, and let in by design, in order to gie later
!%
Religion
readers a clue that all was not exactly as transcribed`. One does not know.
One cannot know. But Sitchin has picked them all up, and we all owe him
a debt o gratitude or that.
In the Chapter on Ma.. Miva Covtrot c v.tarevevt I explain the results
o being created by these 'Gods' ,the Biblical Neilim,. And how we
would hae taken their word or the way to lie, and why we would hae
emulated them in all respects.
\es, I know Sitchin has been outed` as one o the Reptilians. ,1he
shape-shiters,. In act the inormation in his books, known collectiely as
1be artb Cbrovicte., could surely hae only come rom that kind o deep
knowledge. 1he inormation, the insights and the critical thinking behind
them, are ar and away too consistent to be purely intuitie. lis ideas are
imparted with mathematical precision.
Sitchin is undoubtedly ,in my mind at least, one o the ew who are on
lumanity`s side.
According to the Ancient Sumerian 1ablets, 'taxation' was rie in
Ancient Sumer. 6,000 years ago.
Jesus ,i he existed,: 1brer tbe vove,tevaer. ovt of tbe 1evte. According
to the Bible he was once asked about taxation. lis reply was: Revaer vvto
Cae.ar tbat rbicb i. Cae.ar., ava to tbe ora tbat rbicb i. tbe ora..
It's a pity none o these people eer used a modicum o Common
Sense, pointing out that 'money' is an illusion.
So it's now time to stand up and see how we hae all been deceied or
some 300,000 years. And claim our lumanity.
!&
Chapter 5: Global Elite/Psychopaths
o we hae three major illusions: 'Money', 'Legalese' and 'Religion'.
All three deliberately designed or mass mind control and mass
enslaement.
S
\ho is running this show \ell, the best answer anyone has yet come
up with is: 1he Global Llite. 1he Banksters. ,But they also own
eerything else, including all the 'big' Corporations, and Goernments, the
media, and legal systems, etc,. Reerring back to what was said earlier,
details o all o this hae been exposed or at least 20 years by researching
writers such as Daid Icke, Jordan Maxwell, \illiam Cooper, and others.
Others include Myron lagan, Benjamin lriedman, and Jack Bernstein,
going back as ar as the 1960s. Len Charlie Chaplin could see something
was ery wrong`.
It is apparent to me that, while there has been much discussion on just
who, exactly, the Global Llite are - naming names such as the
Rothschilds, Rockeellers, Bromans, \ebbs, \indsors, etc. - it seems it
has yet to be explained just, exactly, what the Global Llite are, in terms o
their obious 'lack o humanity'. And what, and why, that is.
Daid Icke has reerred to them as: arivg vo evatb,. \hich is true.
1hey would not hae created these Grand Deceptions i they had been
'nice people to do business with'.
Now, you'll probably resent knowing this, but you exist in a prison-
without-bars. A prison that has been careully constructed, oer centuries,
by those 'not ery nice people to do business with'.
Unlike a real prison - where you see the bars - you'll irmly beliee you
are - basically - ree. But, unortunately, you are not. As each day goes by,
your reedoms - many o which are essential or a decent and reasonable
lie - are being taken away rom you by ery subtle stealth.
And this has been going on or a ery long time.
lopeully, when you hae read to the end o this book, you'll
understand the prison, and will be able to see the bars, and be in the
position o breaking out o them, using the enormous power you possess.
Power you do not realise you actually hae.
In his book 11 George Orwell said: e rbo covtrot. tbe re.evt, covtrot.
tbe a.t. e rbo covtrot. tbe a.t, covtrot. tbe fvtvre.
!'
Global Llite/Psychopaths
1o understand today, one must understand a certain amount o history.
1o understand the possibilities or uture, one must understand today.
George Orwell also said: Ovi..iov i. tbe bigge.t forv of a tie. ,One could,
in point o act, quote Orwell almost constantly. lor the ery simple
reason that, in the 1940s, he actually gae us an amazing number o clues,
through that book and his other masterpiece, .vivat arv,
'1he past' means 'history'. low ar back in history do we need to go
\ell, in point o act you can go back as ar as you wish. lor the ery
simple reason that 'human nature' has always been with us. And the
lessons we must learn derie rom what happens when human nature is
up against a 'less-than-human nature'.
\hat do I mean by that I'll simply quote ONL, eriiable,
medical,genetic statistic: "One in every 2S people are born
psychopathic". 1hat's a quote rom the studious works o Psychologist
Andrew M. Lobaczewski. See his book Potiticat Poverotog,: . cievce ov tbe
âtvre of rit .a;v.tea for Potiticat Pvro.e. ;1).
Since there are 4 x 25s in eery hundred, this means 4 people in eery
hundred, or 4 o the total population are psychopathic. According to
my arithmetic, and taking the population o the United Kingdom as 60
million people, that means there are 2,400,000 psychopaths out there.
Do you think it might be a good idea to know this?
Does that mean 2.4 million 'axe murderers' \ell no, not exactly, as
you will see, but it does mean that there is the potential for 2.4 million
'axe murderers'. Psychopaths-in-society tend to be much more subtle.
,And get a heck o a lot urther than axe murderers, as we will see,.
It all comes down to what a psychopath actually is. Put simply it is a
person who has no conscience. No compassion toward others. No
empathy towards others. Unable to eel guilt, or shame.
low does this occur It occurs because o the lack o a gene in such a
person's DNA. 1he gene that creates 'eelings towards others'.
But a psychopath retains 'eelings towards themseles'. Although they
don't eel guilt or any action they may take, they do eel 'ear'. And they
know what would happen to them i they get caught. So they are araid o
getting caught. 'lear o getting caught' is, in act, the only thing that
actually keeps them in check.
So, i the possibility o 'getting caught' can be eliminated, then the
psycho has ree rein. And that, undamentally, is what has happened.
!(
low has the possibility o getting caught been eliminated Money and
blackmail. I you hae enough money, you can do anything. \ou can buy
people o. \ou can arrange circumstances that create the possibilities or
blackmail. \ou can arrange or 'character assassination' in the media
,because you own the media!,. \ou can arrange or actual assassinations.
\ith suicient money behind you, you can do anything.
Back in the 18
th
century, Amshel Rothschild said: Cire ve covtrot of a
vatiov. vove, .vt,, ava care vot rbo va/e. tbe tar.. \es, the thing about
these psychos is they catch on a lot quicker than most o us. Most people
ind the idea o a psycho hard to grasp at irst sight. So it might be an idea
to think about it in a little depth.
A baby is born. 1he baby looks like all others i.e. \inston Churchill.
1he baby learns to crawl, talk a bit, and to toddle. 1here is ery little to
distinguish this small person rom any other.
It is only when this person becomes what we would call 'a child' that
any symptoms might be detectable. And only then i we knew what we
were looking or, and that is ar rom easy ,in act may not be possible,,
because all children can be naughty.
Picture a school playground. A child alls, or is knocked, oer. Other
children rush up, and say: .re ,ov att rigbt. or: Cav bet ,ov v., and so
on.
1he psychopathic child sees this, and thinks: aovt /vor rb, tbe, ao
tbat. 1be, arevt bvrt. !b, .bovta tbe, care. v vot bvrt. aovt care. But, on
the other hand, not to be seen as the odd one out, the psychopathic child
learns to do the same. Not because they care, but just because they don't
want to be seen as odd.
In short, a psycho learns 'how to emulate a conscience' - by obsering
the reactions o others.
During teenage years, as knowledge accumulates, and as situations
come and go, the psycho could well be tempted to say ,to themseles,:
Yov /vor, vo.t eote are .tvia. 1be, bare a robtev. 1be, are forerer too/ivg ovt
for otber., rbev tbe, .bovta be too/ivg ovt for tbev.etre.. Ye., tbe, bare a robtev.
aovt bare tbat robtev, v gtaa to .a,. tbiv/ tbe, are ivferior. tbiv/ ra. borv
.verior. Perba. v ove of tbat va.ter race tbe, tota ve abovt iv .cboot. 1be ove.
tbe Cervav. betierea to ei.t, ava fovgbt !! orer.
And, gradually, it dawns on them: cav v.e tbi. to v, aaravtage! /vor
bor to reteva, re aove tbat OK .o far. o if carr, ov retevaivg to care, voove
ritt reati.e tbat cav v.e v, aaravtage, v, .veriorit,.
"*
Consequent to all o this, they will generate - within themseles - a
burning ambition to 'get to the top o the tree, by hook or by crook'.
Letting nothing stand in their way. Beore long they will consider it their
'destiny'. And they will justiy this by saying to themseles: e,, ta/ivg
tbe.e eote for a riae i. gooa, becav.e tbe, teare tbev.etre. oev to it. 1be, actvatt,
.K for it! 1be, actvatt, ae.erre it!.
In business, when up or promotion, they will use eery trick in the
book - as long as they don't get caught - to get the job on oer. I other
people's lies are ruined in the process . so what
And so on. Surely I'e said enough to paint the oerall picture
Once in a position o 'power', it is then possible to promote psychos to
sta the hierarchy below. And conjoin them, by arious orms o
blackmail, to proide protection rom 'getting caught'. 1his could be the
simple blackmail o: Yov ret, ov ve for ,ovr ;ob, verer forget tbat. ,1hat's ery
simple, but ery powerul, blackmail . is it not,.
Is it possible that such phrases as: t. aog eat aog ovt tbere or: 1bere. vo
.evtivevt iv bv.ive.. and: f aiavt ao it, .oveove et.e rovta ,and so on,
could come straight out o the mouths o such people Is it possible that
such people could send thousands to ight, kill, maim, bomb innocent
men, women, children and babies - in some oreign country - and they,
themseles, still get a good night's sleep No shame. No guilt. No
responsibility or their actions. 'Justiied' by their 'ability to take the hard
decisions'
Len to be caught endlessly lying, and yet still smile and carry on
regardless No shame. No guilt. ,No resignation,.
Does anyone see a connection here, between what I'e said and British
Prime Ministers And US Presidents And lrench Presidents And
German Chancellors And UN Secretary-Generals And LU
Commissioners Russian Presidents In point o act the 'leaders' o eery
nation on Larth
Or am I just plain old paranoid
lere is a quote rom a Psychologist who ully admits to neer actually
interiewing 1ony B Liar, haing just had the ,unpleasant, experience o
analysing him ia the 1V screen ,this quote dates rom about 2004, when
I receied it in an e-mail,: bare ror/ea ritb a tot of .,cboatb., ava tbe ove
tbivg abovt tbev tbat i. cov.i.tevt i. tbat rbaterer tbe, are aoivg, tbeir e,e. raret,
cbavge. 1bere i. ;v.t a cotave.. tbere. Yov /vor, rbev a beattb, er.ov .vite. tbeir
e,e. tigbt v or covrer.et, btae ritb avger. v att tbe ictvre. ava 11 broaaca.t.
re .eev of 1ov, iar .ic., bi. e,e. are atra,. fiea erev rbev be. .vitivg a. iv
tbe ictvre. of tbe Coa covvevt.
")
!bev a er.ov .tart. .a,ivg tbat be cov.vttea Coa abovt .tartivg a rar tbat tea to
tbe /ittivg of ivvocevt eote a. rett a. ovr orv ,ovvg .erricevev, it. a .vre .igv be i.
.vfferivg frov .,cboatb,. |vfortvvatet, it. vot cov.iaerea treatabte vvaer tbe
Mevtat eattb .ct! tair vv.t be toc/ea v iv a eciat o.itat fortbritb. vt
.ove tribvvat ritt robabt, tet biv ovt to /itt agaiv!
Note what was said by the Psychologist. 'Psychopathy' is the one major
mental state or which the rest o society cannot be protected under the
Mental lealth Act.
\hy did 1ony B Liar make it so easy to collect your DNA at eery
possible opportunity It goes back to the DNA, remember DNA analysis
can detect whether you are a psycho like 1ony, or not.
DNA has nothing whatsoeer to do with catching criminals, and 1ony
knew there are no terrorists to speak o - apart rom himsel and his gang
o psychos. \our DNA is in your hair. Pick a stray hair rom someone's
jacket - in a restaurant - and you hae something that can be let at a
crime scene or the police to ind.
low can that situation possibly work
It can't.
Now let's summarise. Psychopaths hae been around since the dawn o
time. 1heir 'condition' gies themseles a driing ambition, to 'get to the
top by hook or by crook'. But what's the point o getting to the top
1here is only one point: 1o dominate. 1here is no point in haing
'power' oer others unless it is wielded, which proides the uel or
massie ego-massaging.
Quite why one should eel the driing desire to control others is
something I don't, personally, understand. I don't understand the logic
and rationale o their mindset. I don't see the point o their mindset. I
don't see any ultimate point. I don't see how it can eer hae any ultimate
point. But I ully understand that they hae that mindset.
Personally speaking, I think you should do your thing, and I do my
thing, and we just all get along amicably - without me dominating you, or
you dominating me. I can see that idea stretching into ininity without
introducing rancour - rancour that would eentually generate reolution
and bloodshed.
Consequently the psychopathic mindset is utterly myopic, in my
humble opinion. But that has neer stopped them rom being cleer.
liendishly cleer, in point o act. And that did not stop them rom
playing a ery, ery, long term game. A game that the initiating psychos
"!
neer expected to see the results o, but they thought their descendents
would.
1his attitude is the source o the 'Diine Right o Kings'. \hich
translates as: !e are .verior becav.e re are vvivbibitea. !e cav va/e
vvivbibitea, ai.a..iovate, aeci.iov. ritb ,ovr tife ava tivb.
,Back in olden times o course the King also risked his own lie and
limb. But that all goes away as soon as a woman takes the throne i.e.
Queen Llizabeth I, or Queens Anne, Victoria, Llizabeth II. And
nowadays the Monarch only 'risks their children'. But that's only to some
extent. By pulling strings, the 'risks' are minimised to almost nothing,
But, remember, it's all in the DNA. 1he 'compassion gene' could
return, to the bloodline, i marriages are not ery careully arranged. Now
do you understand why these bloodlines are kept 'pure' It is to ensure
that this pesky gene doesn't return so as to interere with the 'Diine
Right o Kings'.
\e know what happens i that pesky gene returns. I someone rom a
psychopathic amily, but in possession o a 'better nature', makes it to 'the
top', then they are assassinated ,JlK,. And so is their brother ,RlK,. And
their son ,JlK Jr.,. And so that pesky gene is eliminated.
1his also happens i a non-psychopathic Pope attains that position.
Ater 33 days, they are poisoned. Got to keep that pesky gene under
control!
So that's what we are dealing with. Does it all make a lot more sense
now Does it explain why demonstrations, letter-writing campaigns,
petitions and so orth - and elections - make not the slightest dierence
Because all o these are appealing to the 'better nature' o creatures that do
not possess a 'better nature'!
As you will see, i you read on, your only deence is to know your
enemy, and put your oot down. Using the immense power you possess.
Power you do not realise you hae. 1he power to make decisions based
on Common Sense, and to put those decisions into eect.
""
Chapter 6: Promises & Contracts
luman A makes a promise to luman B, is luman C bound to
honour that promise \e know this sort o thing happens, certainly
within a amily. Mum promises next-door neighbour that her son will
come round tomorrow and ix the leaking guttering.
I
Meanwhile her son has arranged something or himsel or tomorrow.
Get the picture Ob . Mvv! rovi.ea teffie rovta ta/e ber ovt
tovorror! bit! Yov atra,. ao tbi. to ve!.
It doesn't work, does it No . you can't go around making other
people's promises. \ou can only make your own promises.
Common Sense.
So, what right does any Goernment hae - to make promises on your
behal
\ell . none really.
But there are exceptions. And I'll explain an obious one by example.
,Please do not accuse me o chauinism. I write this example in the
simplest way, so as to make the situation clear. \ou can substitute sexes as
much as you wish. 1he result, the analogy, is precisely the same,
A secretary will run an Appointments Book or her boss. She will know
his business inside and out, and will take calls on his behal. And, when
clients call, she will make appointments or him, and he will ulill those
appointments. Because he trusts her, and she trusts him.
1he essence o this equitable situation is that little word 'trust'.
And, more importantly, this entire arrangement exists because both the
secretary and the boss hae 'consented' to it in the irst place. le oered
her the job, and she consented to accept it.
'Consent' and 'trust' are essential or a situation where one can make
promises on behal o someone else. 'Consent' and 'trust' are essential or
equitable arrangements.
Otherwise it is not possible to make promises on behal o someone
else.
Common Sense
I you don't trust your Goernment, then it has no right to make
promises on your behal.
"#
Promises & Contracts
Common Sense
I the Goernment makes treaties with the Luropean Union, then the
Goernment is making promises with the Luropean Union.
Not you. \ou are making no promises. And you cannot be held
responsible and lawully bound by any promises the Goernment may
make. Only the Goernment is bound by the promises it makes.
Unless you consent to it, no-one has the right to make promises on
your behal. No-one ,unless you consent!,
\ou really need to understand this. It's just plain Common Sense.
Don't moan you neer got a Reerendum. \ou always hae a
Reerendum! It's called Lawul Rebellion, as we will see. ,And you can do
90 o it rom the comort o your armchair,.
But we will come to that. Let's keep on track, and put promises into
context.
A Contract is: . rovi.e tbe ar ritt evforce. 1hat's the basic deinition.
But you may notice that is singular. \hich reers, thereore to a singular
Contract. 1here are such things but, or our purposes, they are not worth
dwelling upon.
lor our purposes, the Contracts that are important are those between
two Parties - generally you and someone, or something, else.
1hereore I will explain the Contract as: . air of ivteraeevaevt vvtvatt,
ecbavgea rovi.e. tbe ar ritt evforce, being the basic deinition to examine.
lor a Contract to be enorceable in Law, it must ulill certain
commonsense criteria. 1here are our o them, and they are designed to
make sure the promises are suiciently explicit, such that neither Party
can later claim: ra.vt tota abovt tbat bit!.
1hese components are:
1. Iull Disclosure: \hich means that each Party writes down exactly
what their promise comprises, and all the releant circumstances, so as to
put it into the context they consider applicable. I one has any sense, any
necessary 'get outs' should be included within the lull Disclosure.
2. Lqual Considerations: A Contractual Consideration is an item o
alue`. It may be money, or it may be an item. Both Parties must consider
the exchange to be equal in alue.
,As we hae already seen, money` is an illusion, and is nothing more
than an empty, meaningless IOU. Consequently most Contracts can be
shown to ail in this respect, i one has the will to do that. 1his is
"$
explained later. One argument, when receiing a demand or money is:
!bat ao ,ov ravt ve to a, ,ov ritb. Meavivgte.., evt,rovi.e, rortbte.. Debt
ôte.. Or ao ,ov ravt .ovetbivg of ratve, iv rbicb ca.e ,ov veea to a./ for it,.
Obiously or Considerations to be equal they cannot change, once
agreed. 1hus any Contract employing ariable Interest Rates is null &
oid in Law. Accepting the alidity o ariable Considerations, and not
standing up against them, is precisely how so many people embroil
themseles in debt.
And, in any case - as we will see when we re-consider 'money' in the
Chapter on Ma.. Miva Covtrot c v.tarevevt, the unds to create 'Interest'
orms no part o our Monetary Belie System. Or, to put this another way,
'Interest' is nowhere created, and consequently it is impossible to pay o
all loans, and impossible or eeryone to stay out o bankruptcy. 1hose
who stay out o bankruptcy are doing so purely on the backs o those who
enter bankruptcy - purely because they were simply the irst to grab
whateer was aailable. ,\hether they realise this or not,.
3. Lawful 1erms and Conditions: \hich, undamentally, means that
there should be no mischie in the proposed agreements.
4. Mutual Intent: \hich means 'some maniestation that each Party
intended to Contract'. 1his could be hand-written signature 'marks', or
can be 'conduct'. In other words i at least one o the Parties starts to do
what was promised. 1his is sometimes expressed as 'perormance' - or, at
least, 'the start o perormance'.
\ou hae, probably without realising it, entered into many Contracts in
your lie. And, as we shall see, most o them are null and oid in Law,
because ,een allowing or the small print, they ail on at least one o the
components 1, 2, 3 or 4.
1he most important thing to realise is that no small print` can oerride
the undamental aspects a Contract must ulill in order to be lawul, and
thereore enorceable. Inalid small print` does not actually nulliy a
Contract, but its proisions are irreleant because they are unenorceable
in Law. 1hereore any Contract that relies upon unenorceable small
print ,or example ariable Interest Rates, is - to all intents and purposes
- null & oid. But you have to say so. A Court will not say it for you.
And this proides the necessary 'get-outs'. Ultimately, at any rate.
loweer, as we shall see, you hae many more get-outs beore resorting
to nulliying Contractual Obligations. Neertheless it is always a good idea
to keep these points in mind, and not to orget them. lor the simple
reason that you will gain conidence by knowing that - at the end o the
day - you can actually win any-which-way.
"%
Promises & Contracts
Preiously I reerred to your immense power. Part o your power is this
knowledge. And the act that those you deal with ,I call them the Organic
Robots, hae absolutely no understanding o this at all. 1hey just operate
'by rote'. And this includes the ast majority o the so-called 'Legal
Proession'. 1his enables you to run rings around them.
1here are a number o other points. One o the main ones being that:
.aaivg .ovetbivg to tbe Covtract ovce it ba. .tartea i. vot attorea. 1here are
many instances where this happens. A prime example o this is 'upping
the Interest Rate'. No! No! No! 1hat's a breach o Contract, matey! \ou
can't adjust the Considerations once they hae been agreed! Once agreed,
they are ixed. And it's no good writing them into the Contract in the irst
place. I you write unlawul Conditions into a Contract, then those
proisions are not enorceable. Only the lawful Conditions are
enforceable in Law.
But you have to say so. Otherwise they will walk all over you.
But there are some ery subtle ones as well. I, when you buy
something, the 1erms & Conditions are inside the box, then they are null
& oid. 1he Contract started when you handed oer the money to
purchase the item. At that point, i the 1erms & Conditions were not
made absolutely clear to you ,beore you handed oer the money,, then
appraising you o them, in a booklet, inside the box, is: 1oo btooa, tate,
vate!.
1his is all absolute Common Sense, i you think about it. Anything else
deines a moing target, a rug that can be pulled away rom under you.
luman Beings cannot interact reasonably, sensibly and peaceully on that
sort o basis, can they No-one would know where they stood, would
they
And, that's the point. 1hat's precisely why you neer know where you
really stand. Because you don't know the basics o how Contracts work.
\ou assume you must do what you are told. And you do. And that results
in not knowing where you stand.
I your Common Sense tells you something is wrong, then it is telling
you the truth. Something is wrong ,very wrong!,. lopeully ,as I keep
saying, by the time you hae read this book, you will know exactly what to
do about it.
"&
Chapter 7: Honour, Dishonour & Noticing
t all comes down to this. In the Chapter on 1a/ivg I explained that
there is no dishonour in doing that in order to surie in reasonable
comort. Dishonour comes rom just being thoroughly greedy. I
On a day-to-day basis there is more than that, i you decide you want to
do something, as most people are doing all the time.
I you eel that what you want to do aects no-one else at all, then you
just do it. I eel like making a cup o tea. So I just do it. I don't ask anyone
else.
But there are many things that could easily aect someone else. And, I
would guess, we would all think it reasonable to be a little bit more
cautious in those circumstances. Ater all, we don't want repercussions, do
we
So how do you go about that low do you do something honourably
1he answer is to gie anyone who may be aected some notice. In
other words you send them a Notice. ,\ou 'Notice' them,.
\ell, that's OK so ar. \ou can write down what you plan to do,
explaining it in a letter. And send it to whomsoeer you eel may be
aected by your plan.
And you tell them, in your letter: Ptea.e tet ve /vor if ,ov ob;ect, girivg ve
,ovr rea.ov.. 1bav/ ,ov rer, vvcb.
And then, i you receie objections, you negotiate amicably, to arrie at
an arrangement that is acceptable to all.
\ell, that's easy enough, isn't it
No It's not that easy \hat happens i - as normal - they ignore you
So you don't receie any objections, and you just go ahead, and then they
object!
Ahh! Problem! \ell, this can be taken care o, with honour.
\hat you do, within the Notice you send, is to explain that you are
going to assume a reasonable time to receie objections. Quite oten this
is 14 days, but it can be longer or shorter depending on how you eel. \ou
can choose the period, o course, but it is only honourable to be
reasonable.
"'
Honour, Dishonour & Noticing
\ou say that, i you don't hear back ater the time period has elapsed,
then you hae the Right to assume they don't object.
As a luman Being you do hae that Natural, Inalienable, Right.
I you do not get any response to your Notice, within the time period
you hae stated, then you hae the right to assume 'acquiescence'. In other
words 'tacit consent' to your plan.
,It is always a good idea to send your Notice by Registered Post,
although the so-called 'Legal Proession', and most Oicious Bodies,
employ a rule that says: . tetter .evt ritb a ir.t Cta.. .tav affiea i. gooa
evovgb for .errice to be a..vvea. Quite how they think they can get away with
that is totally beyond me. But then, as I said in the Chapter discussing
egate.e, the 'legal world' is an illusory world, deoid o any rationality at
all,.
\ou can also send a reminder, giing a time period extension. 1his
would be looked upon more aourably as more honourable, howeer ,in
my experience, a response is still unlikely, i you didn't get one rom the
original Notice.
1his is generally because most people don't understand what 'being
honourable' is all about. 1he assumption is that, i they need to object,
they can do that i you go ahead.
\rong! Once you hae Noticed them lawully, they no longer hae any
power o objection. O course, you need to know that yoursel, and to
stand on it. \ou may receie ery intimidating letters rom someone's
Solicitors. \ou simply need to write the appropriate reply.
1he reply should point out that you hae acted honourably, and
supplied due Notice. ,\ou would send them a copy o your original
Notice,. \ou point out that you allowed or objections, and receied none
in the set timescale. \ou then point out that you hae obtained, by these
honourable actions on your part: Pervavevt ava irrerocabte tarfvt e.toet b,
acqvie.cevce.
1hat shuts them up. ,\ell, it would shut most people up, wouldn't it
\ell, I think it would make anyone blink quite a ew times, and take a ew
sharp intakes o breath, at the ery least,.
Bear in mind a Solicitor will know what 'estoppel' means. le or she
won't know ery much, but they will know that. It is a lawul 'gag'. An
injunction i you will. One that you can create or yoursel. It is designed
to say: oo/! vovgb i. evovgb! 1bi. cavvot go ov forerer. 1bere ba. to be a cvtoff,
ava tbi. i. it! 1be toivg ava froivg .to. bere. 1be bvc/ .to. bere. ô vore! Cea.e!
"(
De.i.t! bare actea bovovrabt,, ava ,ov,,ovr Ctievt bare vot. 1be ar .a,. .o. o
,ov cav .oa off, ava ,ov /vor ,ov cav.
\es, it shuts them up all right. And. 1hey. Do. Not. Like. It. Up 'em!
As a sting in the tail, you can Notice the Solicitor that urther
correspondence with him or her in the matter will be charged at _500 ,or
_500,000 i you like . anything you like . you set the rate, per letter.
1hey do that, and so can you. \ou can do this to anyone. ,Debt
Collecting Agencies are good ones to be on the receiing end o this sort
o thing, as we will see later,
It's all just Common Sense, So don't be surprised i 'the line suddenly
goes dead'.
Long Live Lawful Rebellion!
#*
Societies & Statutes
Chapter 8: Societies & Statutes
reerred to Statutes in the Chapter on egate.e. Now I come to
explain them in more detail. \e are told we lie in a society. I stress:
!e are tota tbat. And no-one argues because they assume they know
what it means.
I
But - just a minute! lold on there! 1here are things called 'societies'
that you don't lie in. 1he Law Society, or example. Do you lie in 1he
Law Society I doubt it. Really 'lie in' should be: .v av accreaitea Mevber
of, because Societies hae Memberships, don't they
\ell, yes they do. Societies are actually deined in a number o ways.
lirstly a Name, secondly a Mission Statement, thirdly a Set o Society
Rules, and lastly a Membership.
lere's Chambers Online ,wrong again!,:
society noun (societies) J humankind as a whole, or a part of it
such as one nation, considered as a single community. 2 a division
of humankind with common characteristics, eg of nationality, race
or religion. 3 an organized group or association, meeting to share a
common interest or activity o I'm a member of the gliding society. 4
a the rich and fashionable section of the upper class, b the social
scene of this class section, c as adj o a society wedding. S formal
company o He prefers the society of women. 6 ecol a small plant
community within a larger group.
,1, & ,2, conlict, logically, with ,3,, ,4,, ,5, and ,6,. 1hat's why it's
wrong.
,3, is basically what 'a Society' is, in act.
1he essential point being the Membership aspect.
Societies need to be joined. Members hae to apply or Membership,
and be accepted as Members.
Get the idea \hen did you apply or Membership o the luman
Species
No, the luman Species is not 'a Society'. It is 'Mankind', or 'the
luman Species' or 'lomo Sapiens' . make your choice . but 'a Society'
it is not!
And don't let them ool you that it is. Len i they manage to do that,
don't orget the other thing about Societies. \ou apply or Membership
#)
because you eel the Mission Statement is something you support. And
you want to help.
But - i the Society starts o down a road you don't agree with - you
can always resign!
I the luman Species is 'a Society' . how can you resign Death is the
only obious resignation, but I think that's just a little drastic, mysel.
Personally I go or: cv.e ve! ra. verer a./ea rbetber or vot ravtea to
;oiv. aovt, tberefore, cov.iaer bare ;oivea . rbaterer av,ove et.e va, tbiv/.
cov.iaer bare beev tborovgbt, aeceirea, tbrovgbovt v, evtire tife. aovt veea to
.vbvit v, re.igvatiov, becav.e ra. ovt, ;oivea a. a Mevber ov .oveove et.e.
a..vvtiov iv tbe fir.t tace. .va tbat aoe.vt covvt, a. far a. v covcervea.
Now, a Statute is deined as 'A legislated rule o a Society'.
So how can a Statute apply to you, i you are not a Member o the
Society
Answer: It can't. \hat is happening here resonates back with the
business o 'someone making promises on someone else's behal'.
No can do. No way, Jose!
\ou might be inding this all a bit tricky, but hold on tight. An
explanation is looming on the horizon. In act it is getting closer as you
read. It might, just might, make you stand up, rush to the door, open it,
run into the middle o the road, and shout ,at the top o your oice,:
atte,btooa,too,ab!.
1his is the missing piece o the jigsaw: 1he United Kingdom is a
Society. So is the united States o America. And so are most o ,what we
call, 'countries' on this planet.
\e call them Countries. Because we neer knew any dierent.
loweer a ery long time ago, the Countries, the Nations, were re-
organised into CORPORA1IONS, or the conenience o the Global
Llite.
1hey are listed on Dun & Bradstreet. On said website you can obtain
Credit Reports on them. Lerything is CORPORA1ONS. 1he Ministry
o Justice is a CORPORA1ION, lM 1reasury is a CORPORA1ION.
1he Police lorce is a CORPORA1ION. ,1he UK Police hae no more
authority than Securicor. Or Group4,.
Len the British Labour Party is the 1rading Name o a
CORPORA1ION called 'ALAS1AIR DARLING, MP' ,at the time o
writing,.
#!
Societies & Statutes
Also note that there is another CORPORA1ION, called 'MLMBLRS
Ol PARLIAMLN1', and yet another called 'lM QULLN LLIZABL1l
II'
Getting the idea
So, what does this mean It means that Statutes passed by a
CORPORA1ION called 'MLMBLRS Ol PARLIAMLN1' are the
'legislated rules' o the CORPORA1ION known as '1lL UNI1LD
KINGDOM CORPORA1ION'.
1hey are the Company Policy o the CORPORA1ION known as
'1lL UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION'.
And, i you don't work or that CORPORA1ION - i you are not a
Member ,i.e. employee, o that CORPORA1ION, then the 'legislated
rules' don't apply to you.
I'll repeat this, in order to drie it home. Statutes do not apply to you,
unless you are a Member o a CORPORA1ION called '1lL UNI1LD
KINGDOM CORPORA1ION'. ,1hese legislated rules being created by
the sub-CORPORA1ION, designed or that purpose, called 'MLMBLRS
Ol PARLIAMLN1'.
Are you a Member o 1lL UNI1LD KINGDOM
CORPORA1ION
\hen did you apply \as your Membership request accepted
1he answer is: \our parents applied when you were born. Because they
Registered your birth. And, in doing so, a Legal liction Person was
automatically created or you as a Member o 1lL UNI1LD
KINGDOM CORPORA1ION. egat ictiov Per.ov. are described in their
own Chapter.
loweer, it is ery doubtul that your parents realised what they were
actually doing at the time, and thought they were under an obligation to
do what they did. In the same way that you may ery well hae done the
same thing in the case o your own children.
No recriminations, thereore.
And no recriminations really necessary - or the simple reason that,
Common Sense must tell you, lull Disclosure neer occurred at the time -
otherwise no Registrations would ,I think it can be reasonably assumed,
eer hae occurred. No-one in their right mind, appraised o all the acts,
would willingly hand oer their newborn to become an employee o a
massie conglomerate CORPORA1ION.
#"
Any assumed Contract, between your parents and that
CORPORA1ION is null & oid ,in Law,, due to lack o lull Disclosure,
lack o Lqual Consideration, and lack o Intent to Contract.
Bingo! You are free, because you say you are free!
All you hae to do is to remember: 1he Organic Robots haen't a clue
about all this, and they hae loads o 'numbers' and loads o 'muscle'.
1hey hae brawn, but no brains.
On the other hand you will tend to be dealing with only one or two at
any gien time. Consequently the best thing to do is to tie them up in
knots ... beore they get the chance to reach or the 'muscle'.
##
Common Law, 1he Law-of-the-Land
Chapter 9: Common Law, The Law-of-the-Land
ow we are cooking on gas! 1his is where it all starts and it all
ends. \hat is Common Law \ell it really doesn't matter what
any dictionary says. loweer let's hae a quick look at what
Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary ,10th Ldition, says:
N
1bat art of tbe tar of vgtava forvvtatea, aeretoea ava aavivi.terea b, tbe ota
covvov tar covrt. ba.ea origivatt, ov tbe covvov cv.tov. of tbe covvtr,, ava
vvrrittev. t i. oo.ea to eqvit, ;tbe boa, of rvte. aavivi.terea b, tbe Covrt of
Cbavcer,); to .tatvte tar ;tbe tar taia aorv iv .ct. of Partiavevt); to .eciat tar ;tbe
tar aavivi.terea iv .eciat covrt. .vcb a. eccte.ia.ticat tar ava tbe tar vercbavt); ava
to tbe cirit tar ;tbe tar of Rove). t i. tbe covvov.ev.e of tbe covvvvit,, cr,.tati.ea
ava forvvtatea b, ovr forefatber.. t i. vot tocat tar, vor tbe re.vtt of tegi.tatiov.
1hat's as good a deinition as any. Because, in short, Common Law 'is'.
It just 'is'.
It is there.
No ducking. No diing. No weaing. No way out. Applicable to all.
lrom the highest to the most lowly. 1hat's what the deinition says.
But then, who wants a way out Common Law ,commonsense, says
the way to lie peaceully is to:
J) Not breach the peace,
2) Cause no-one else any harm,
3) Cause no-one else any loss,
4) Not use mischief in your promises and agreements.
Personally speaking, I hae no problem whatsoeer with that. In point
o act I ully welcome it as, I submit, so would any sane, reasonable, and
responsible luman Being.
Common Law is the Law-of-the-Land. It is the Law that has come
about by means o the customs & traditions o Land-Dwellers.
And, the point is, Parliament has absolutely no say in Common Law. It
is there, and they cannot touch it. In point o act, Parliament ,and
Congress, is actually bound by it. Just like eeryone else. ,Not that they
realise that, o course. One o the biggest upsets` on the horizon will
come when enough people realise this, and bring them to book or their
gross negligence,.
#$
1he only 'law' that Parliament can create ,since the Law-o-the-Land
has already been created, is the Law-o-\aters. lence Statutes are the
Law-o-\aters. And Statutes need your consent, beore they can be
applied to you, i you are located on dry land.
In this case you need to become a Member o the UNI1LD
KINGDOM CORPORA1ION, and or Legalese lictional purposes
actually be prepared to be considered as 'a ship on the ocean'. 1here is
more detail about this in the Chapter on the arof!ater., which has its
own Chapter in this book.
Common Law ~ Common Sense. It has been deeloped oer
centuries, within Case Law, to hae - by now - squeezed just about eery
drop o justice out o just about eery conceiable, undamental, situation
- where luman Beings are inoled and interact.
Adances in technology are irreleant. Common Law rests entirely on
'the luman Condition'. las one indiidual behaed honourably, or not
1hat sort o thing.
It is based air and square on the 'customs & traditions' rom the
ancient past. Customs & traditions that were eoled, in a codiied
manner, so as to create peaceul co-existence all round.
Just look at the principles, aboe. \hat else is necessary Answer:
Nothing. Stick to those principles, and nothing else is necessary.
It has been said: oo/ ivto ,ovr beart. |.e ,ovr Covvov ev.e to /vor rbat
i. rigbt ava rbat i. rrovg. f rbat ,ov ravt to ao i. fair, ava ;v.t, tbev ,ov cav ao
it.
No amount o Common Law deiates rom these principles.
Only legislated Statutes aka Company Policy o 1lL UNI1LD
KINGDOM CORPORA1ION or 1lL UNI1LD S1A1LS Ol
AMLRICA CORPORA1ION ,etc.,, deiate rom these principles.
Any deiation is null and oid.
But you hae to say so. \ou hae to understand what is happening, and
to irmly, and politely, stand your ground. 1he avte., in the
Appendices o this book, indicate ways o doing that.
I wrote about ôtice. ,there is a Chapter on them,. And how you can
'put someone on Notice about your intentions'. And how you can create
an estoppel. \hat you are actually doing is making Common Law.
I you take a Solemn Oath, you are making Common Law. I you
create an Aidait, you are making Common Law. Because, in either case,
#%
Common Law, 1he Law-of-the-Land
you are stating \our 1ruth - as you see it. And you hae the right to state
\our 1ruth, as you see it.
1hat's why Common Law is so ephemeral. It's eerywhere. Proided
you do not deiate rom the principles - proided that you act with
honour - you are making \our Own Common Law!
\ou are saying: 1bi. i. M, Cv.tov. 1bi. i. M, 1raaitiov. .va ritt .tic/ to
tbe.e eacefvt rivcite..
Common Sense . yet again!
Ater all, what is the Law, anyway low does it come about
Cov.ev.v. facit tegev. Consent makes the Law.
1he consent o the oerwhelming majority, whose one primary desire
is to lie their lies in peace. In peaceul co-existence with eeryone else.
lree to do whateer it is they choose to do, proided they do not
adersely aect anyone else. lree to trael at will. lree to express
opinions. lree to exchange. And so on. lreedom rom imposed ictions
& illusions. lreedom rom tyranny. lreedom rom the domination o the
many by the ew.
And those Common Sense desires were codiied in Common Law, as a
protection o it.
And this was done many centuries ago. It ormed the basis o the
Magna Carta, the US Constitution, the lrench Constitution, and so on. It
actually orms the basis o eery Constitution eer written. ,Any
Constitution worth its salt, that is,. 1here is an Appendix dedicated to the
Magva Carta 121:, and it is well worth reading.
So the ideas are not new. In point o act the ideas are so old, we seem
to hae orgotten them. It is my sincere hope that this book seres as an
appropriate reminder.
Do you consent to lie in peace I hope you do, otherwise this book is
not or you.
Do you consent to pay or the use o your own property, once
purchased \our dwelling ,Council 1ax,, your coneyance ,Road 1ax,,
your entertainment ,1V Licence, Bearing in mind, o course, that none
o these impositions on your reedom actually und whateer it is they
purport. 1hat, in point o act, they und just about eerything else
besides. Do you consent to aiding & abetting \ar Crimes
\ou don`t \ell, in that case there is no Law by Consent.
Is there
#&
Chapter 10: Notices, nvitations & Summonses
group these together because they are all, essentially, the same thing.
1hey are 'oers to Contract'. \ou see, a Summons ,or example, is
not something that should make your knees go to jelly. A Summons
is just a Notice that should be read as: .v ivritatiov to go to a tace of
bv.ive.., at a certaiv tive, ava ov a certaiv aate, iv oraer to be vaae av offer for a
.errice.
I
1he serice in question being the one o 'adjudication'. 'Arbitration' i
you want to call it that. And you are perectly entitled to write back: ô
tbav/.. Yovr .errice. are vot reqvirea.
\haaaaat!! \hen you receie a Summons there will be accompanying
paperwork. \ou will be oered the chance to plead guilty or not guilty, to
the charge made against you. Actually, as you will see in the appropriate
Chapter, the charge is not leelled at you - it is leelled at your egat
ictiov Per.ov.
Neertheless, by pleading guilty or not guilty, you are accepting the
serice o arbitration that is on oer, and in doing so you are admitting
responsibility or your Legal liction Person.
loweer i, instead o pleading, you make it quite clear that you are not
the Legal liction Person, but are actually a liing, breathing, luman
Being with a soul, and lie in the real world o Common Law, then you
are perectly entitled to write back : ô tbav/.. Yovr .errice. are vot reqvirea.
Cooa aa,, as I explained, aboe.
\ou do this in the orm o a Notice. 1heir Summons to you was a
Notice. \ou respond with a Notice o your own. And, in the same way
they would hae put a time-limit o the Summons ,it may ery well be the
Court Date,, then you can put a time-limit, or the Court's response, on
your Notice back to them.
\ou would head your Notice something like: NO1ICL OI NON-
ACCLP1ANCL OI OIILRLD SLRVICLS AND RLQULS1
IOR CLARIIICA1ION.
\ou would then write a letter explaining that you are a luman Being,
and would they please clariy the situation, because the Summons was
addressed to a Legal liction Person, which you cannot accept as such, but
you wish to know how you, as a luman Being, hae dishonoured any
lawful obligation on your part.
#'
Notices, Invitations & Summonses
Remember: 1he charge against your Legal liction Person will be based
in the ictional and illusory world o Legalese & Statutes. \ou need them
to show which Common Law Principle your luman Sel has breached.
1hey will not be able to do this. 1he Court will probably ignore your
Notice, which will place itself ,they, themseles, in dishonour. It may be
necessary to actually go to the Court, at the date & time o the learing,
and to point out their own dishonour.
lundamentally by claiming Common Law jurisdiction. All is explained
in the Chapter on Covrt. c Proceeaivg.. It is likely to be a ery short
learing. Probably about a minute or so, beore you walk out with an
enormous smile on your ace. If you do it right. And that means
understanding everything in this book.
#(
Chapter 11: Legal Fiction Person
he Legal liction Person is mentioned requently in this book. It is
one o the basic irrationalities o Legalese. But Legalese exists.
Anything to do with the Courts or the Police, in relation to
Statutes, is bound up in Legalese.
1
On a practical note it is no good just telling a Solicitor, or a Magistrate
or a Judge, or a Policeman that they lie in a ictional world o illusion.
1hey do. But their world is so ingrained they will not beliee you. 1hey
een ind it impossible to recognise their own double-think. O course,
one o the most important things about double-think is that you can only
do it as long as you can't recognise you are doing it. ,In that sense it is
sel-ulilling, aka sel-supporting,
\hat you need to do is to know the score, and know how to duck.
One o the primary components o knowing the score is to know when
something that drops on your doormat is addressing you, or your Legal
liction Person. I it is addressed to you, \our luman Sel, then you'll
need to deal with it, in order to aoid dishonour.
I it is addressed to your Legal liction Person, then there are other
ways o dealing. Primarily to place a Unierse between \our luman Sel
and your Legal liction Person. ,Sometimes called: 1ivtativg ,ovr orv
bac/.iae,.
So, there are three things you need to know:
1. \hat is a Legal liction Person, anyway
2. low do you recognise your Legal liction Person being addressed
3. low do you tin-plate the backside o \our luman Sel
lirst o all, a Legal liction Person is oten reerred to as a
S1RA\MAN. 1he reason or this is that the letter addressed to the
S1RA\MAN is, actually, clutching at a straw. I you respond as people
normally do - because they do not recognise the situation - then the grasp
at the straw will succeed.
I you respond as explained in this book, the clutch at the straw will
come away empty-handed.
1his is possibly one o the hardest concepts to grasp. 1he use o the
word 'person', in Legalese, is ery subtle and ery cleer. Simply because
$*
Legal Iiction Person
most luman Beings will consider themseles to be 'a person'. And, o
course, in Oxord Lnglish, they are.
1he best analogy I hae heard is that the word 'person' comes,
originally, rom the word 'persona'. And you need to consider what a
'persona' actually is.
It is your outward maniestation presented to the 5-sense world. It is
what you present, as yoursel, to the world at any gien time. It is ery
much tied to your personality. ,Ater all, the word 'person' is the stem o
the word 'personality',.
It can be thought o as a mask. Or an oercoat. One or more you can
wear, when circumstances permit.
In wet weather your oercoat would need to be a rainproo.
In cold weather your oercoat would need to be one that keeps you
warm, rather than just rainproo.
Do you get the idea
In the circle o your amily & riends your persona would generally be
riendly and kindly.
In the presence o an enemy your persona would be hateul.
\our persona depends on the circumstances you are in, at any gien
time. loweer you, \our Sel, are exactly the same lesh & blood & soul
irrespectie o the circumstances. \ou are always the same soereign
luman Being, with a liing soul.
\ou are not your persona. \ou are you. \ou take on a persona ,wear a
persona, according to circumstances. \ou could also think o it as wearing
dierent masks. ,By the way, you are not your Name, either. See the
Chapter on âve.,.
1he clutch at the straw is attempting to make \ou, \our Sel, 1he
luman Being, wear the Legal lictional Person 'oercoat' or 'mask'.
It is necessary to get you to wear this oercoat or mask because that
means you accept your role or employment as a Member o 1lL
UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION, to whom the Company Policy
applies. ,1o whom the Statutes apply,.
As a ree luman Being you can choose to wear this mask, or not. I
you understand what is really happening, you would almost certainly not
choose to do so. I you don't wear the Legal liction Person mask then
you are not a Member o 1lL UNI1LD KINGDOM
CORPORA1ION, and its rules don't apply to you. Its Company Policy
has no orce o law upon you. \ou can just walk away.
$)
1hat's why you are perectly entitled to say: ô tbav/.. Yovr .errice. are
vot reqvirea. Cooa aa,, as I explained in the Chapter on ôtice., vritatiov.
c vvvov.e..
So how do you recognise a letter addressed to your Legal liction
Person
\ell, irst o all, there is such a thing as a Legal liction Status. Or
'1itle', such as 'Mr.', 'Mrs.', 'Miss', 'Ms.', and so on. 1hese are ictional
titles! 1hey hae no meaning at all! 1hey might be considered to be a
politeness, but - once you recognise what they actually do - they are a
long, long, way rom being polite.
1hey are a long way rom being polite, because they create a Legal
liction Person. A S1RA\MAN. And when present as the irst line o the
address on a Demand or Summons, etc., they represent an attempt to
raudulently shake you down. 1o extract money rom you, with menaces.
And that's not what I call 'polite'.
1his is the most common way o addressing a Legal liction Person. It
is generally accompanied by writing all or a part o your name in
CAPI1ALS.
Actually a 'Name' is a Legal liction as well. In order to be ree, you do
not hae a Name. Instead 'you respond to what you are commonly called'.
\hat 'you are commonly called' can be written by placing colon ,:`, ater
your Gien Names ,all Gien Names hyphenated together,, and then
writing your lamily Name.
1his book has been written by Veronica: Chapman ,or short, . as
commonly called . or Veronica: o the Chapman amily ,or long,.
In practice, since this Lawul Rebellion is all so new to the world, and
the Organic Robots hae yet to come to terms with it, I do accept
"Veronica Chapman" as addressing My luman Sel.
In other words I do not stamp my oot at the missing colon. loweer
I latly reject 'Ms.' or 'Miss' prepended. 1hat's Legal liction Statusille.
loweer perhaps I should point out that this system o writing 'what
you are commonly called' - has no 'legal basis`. It is just a conention that
has been adopted by those in Lawul Rebellion. Can we do that \es .
o course we can! \hy the hell not 1he act that it has no 'legal basis' is
good, because it separates us rom the illusory world o Legalese.
$!
Solicitors, Lawyers & Notaries
Chapter 12: Solicitors, Lawyers & Notaries
hat is the first duty o your Legal Representatie 1o you, the
Client Gosh, no! \rong! 1he irst duty o a Legal
Representatie is to the Court. 1hen to the public. And then to
you, the Client.
\
So, i the Court barks, your Legal Representatie jumps!
\hat is your relationship to the Court i you are legally represented
\ou are being re-presented to the Court ,represented in Court, as an
'imbecilic child'. It doesn't matter what your actual age is, in years. As ar
as the Court is concerned you are a 'ward o the Court'. \ou are
considered a 'child', and your Legal Representatie is the 'adult' who is
looking ater you.
And you are expected to pay or the priilege o being iewed in this
way.
Actually, it does all make sense. In the illusory world o Legalese. \ou
are - to all intents and purposes - a non-comprehending creature ,a child
in essence,, and you do need an 'adult' looking ater you. An adult who
understands Legalese, and thereore what is going on.
So, here is yet another reason or, irstly, representing \our Sel, and
secondly standing on Common Law - thus aoiding any contact with
Legalese, and the 'legal' world. And remaining within the real world o
Common Sense.
Very ew, i any, Solicitors and,or Lawyers are prepared to deend you
on Common Law principles. 1hey will tell you it is: a.ete... 1hat it has:
ô tegat .tavaivg.
O course it is perectly true that it: a. vo tegat .tavaivg. Absolutely!
But the point is that: It has LAWIUL standing, and that always
trumps 'legal standing', so it is a zillion miles rom 'baseless'.
1he Court system does not like this. It hates what it calls Litigants-in-
Person, because that upsets its apple cart. 1hey. Do. Not. Like. It. Up 'em!
low is this deried \ell consider the sections rom the Corpus Juris
Secundum ,C.J.S., legal encyclopedia, olume , section 4, in ligures 1
through 4.
1o what or whom is an attorney's irst duty See ligure 1.
$"
\hat is the legal relationship between an attorney and his,her client
See ligure 2.
ligure 1: 1he relationship between Legal Representatie & Client
ligure 2: 1he relationship between \ou & the Court.
ligure 3: A \ard o the Court.
$#
Solicitors, Lawyers & Notaries
ligure 4: A Litigant-in-Person.
\hat is a ward o the court See ligure 3.
Do you need to challenge jurisdiction Better see ligure 4, particularly the
part that says: ... becav.e if teaaea b, av attorve, .... It means you accept
the jurisdiction of the Court.
$$
Chapter 13: Veronica's Very Cunning 2-Step Plan
for Freedom
already mentioned this in the loreword, but I need to expand upon
it. 1hese steps are nothing more than Common Sense. And that is
the same as Common Law. And most nations on this planet operate
under Common Law as a undamental basis, particularly those that -
historically - were spawned rom the British Isles ,e.g. the united States o
America and Commonwealth countries, let oer rom the days o the
British Lmpire,.
I
Step J: \ou are ree because you say you are ree. Because no-one else
will. \ou hae to think ree 24,, be ree 24, and act ree 24,.
I you don't do that, then you are aking it, and playing with ire, and
are likely to get your ingers burned.
Step 2: \ou hae to ensure eeryone else recognises it, and treats you
accordingly. 1his is the tricky bit. \ou hae to be prepared to lead by
example. \ou hae to learn what reedom is - which means taking the ull
responsibility or your words and deeds, such that you peaceully co-exist
with all other lieorms as ar as possible. \ou hae to think - seriously -
about what that means.
\ou hae to learn that breaching the peace is a serious oence against
all Common Sense, and ,thereore, Common Law. 1hat causing harm or
loss to another is also against Common Sense and Common Law. 1hat
employing mischie in your daily business is likewise against Common
Sense and Common Law. Anything that deliberately prookes or causes
rancour is contrary to Common Sense and Common Law - and these,
thereore, are not only basic crimes, but the only crimes.
1hose are the basics and, once you understand them, eerything else
alls naturally into place.
In point o act Common Sense is worldwide ... stemming rom
humanity itsel. 1he exceptions are strongly religious States who suppress
Common Sense with irrational dogma. It is hard to understand how those
poor souls can eer be ree, but one must, I suppose, neer gie up hope
or them.
\\III has been raging since the end o \\II. \e were led to beliee
that \\III would be the ultimate Nuclear \ar. Since we hae been
deceied in all other areas o our lies, it is no surprise to ind that we
$%
Veronica's Very Cunning 2-Step Plan for Ireedom
were deceied in that respect as well. \\III is an Information \ar. A
war or the control o your Mind. And the applied Mind Control has been
tremendously successul in that respect, to the point where it has become
ingrained.
1he lreedom Moement is the antithesis o Mind Control. 1he
lreedom Moement says: te ovt of beivg a MivaCovtrottea Orgavic Robot,
ava .tart tbiv/ivg for ,ovr.etf. oo/ ivto ,ovr beart. i.tev to it. .tt tbe av.rer. are
tbere. And that's all the lreedom Moement says. 1he rest is just let to
your Common Sense.
loweer this does not mean to say you hae to take eerything on
board all at the same time. 1here is plenty o room or edging your way
into Lawul Rebellion. lor example, you do not hae to abandon your
National Insurance Number until you can make it on your own. It would
be stupid to do that. 1here is nothing to stop you using it less and less,
until - one day - you can say: aovt veea tbat av, vore.
\ou can claim the Rights ia a Notice of Understanding and Intent
and Claim of Right, and I hae included mine in an Appendix. 1his does
not mean I hae to immediately execute the Rights I claimed. I can leae
them in abeyance or as long as I like. 1hat's entirely my own choice. Just
because one may possess a bicycle, doesn't mean one can't go to work in
one`s car. ,Lspecially i it is raining,.
\ou might ind it more eectie to simply introduce these ideas to as
many riends as possible ,rather than anything else,, by starting a local
group o like-minded indiiduals. 1hen you may ery well ind that you
can arrange things in a way that is equitable to all. Apart rom spreading
the word, this also helps to keep the whole group more sel-suicient,
remoing reliance on the corrupt State. In this way you'd hae to get all
your ideas straight. 1here's nothing like explaining an idea or
straightening it out in your own mind.
All that is necessary is to hold on to the 2-Steps as your ultimate goals.
But you can implement them bit by bit. Neer take on any more than you
can chew at any one time. Do not try to run beore you can walk.
loweer you must never let yourself become intimidated by
anyone or anything. I you know your Rights ,your heart will tell you what
they are,, you must stand your ground. It does not matter what they
say. 1hey are wrong. \ou must always remain reasonably polite, but
irm, and be prepared to 'say it like it is'. All that is really important is to
understand the techniques o showing them they are wrong. \ou'll ind
those methodologies in the avte 1evtate., included in an Appendix.
$&
Chapter 14: The Principles of the Application of
Common Law
t is imperatie that you understand them. 1hey are really not hard,
because they are based entirely on the Common Sense o peaceul
and equitable co-existence. I
Under Common Law crimes are, o course, possible. 1hese will hae
the ollowing components:
1. A description o the Crime, being the act that was criminal ,e.g.
murder, raud, etc,
2. A party who was injured - suered harm, or loss, or was deceied by
mischie. 1his must be a luman Being.
3. Someone who makes this claim. 1his must be a luman Being.
Because only a luman being has a Mind with which to deise a claim. It
cannot be '1lL COUR1', or '1lL CRO\N PROSLCU1ION
SLRVICL', etc., because these are not luman Beings, and hae no Mind
with which to deise the claim.
In summary, thereore, a crime comprises the AC1 COMMI11LD,
the INJURLD PAR1\, and the CLAIMAN1.
In any circumstance, thereore, someone who is being accused o
anything at all, can reasonably ask: !bat i. tbe CRM, rbo va/e. tbe
C.M, ava rbo i. tbe ^]|RD P.R1Y.
And these questions will be unanswerable i no Common Law
transgression had occurred.
Perhaps it is also essential to point out that a CRIML itsel has two
components, being the act itsel, and that the action was deliberate. 1his
takes into account genuinely accidental damage, which could not hae
been reasonably oreseen. In other words, or a crime to be proen, it has
to be proed that the transgressor was Guilty o Mind ,'mens rea', in Law,
Contracts stem rom Common Law. Contracts between two luman
Beings. And this is the crux o the 'lreeman business'. And this is why
Legalese attempts the subteruge o deining Partnerships as being
equialent to luman Beings ia the Legal liction Person construct.
Because, or a Contract to be lawully-binding ,enorceable,, it must
comprise the our components described in the Chapter on Provi.e. c
Covtract..
$'
1he Principles of the Application of Common Law
1he only positie way to aoid entering into a lawully-binding
Contract is to use the Intent component, by stating, up ront: ao vot
cov.evt ,in ront o witnesses,. Although a better way, which requires no
witnesses, is to state it in a letter.
$(
Chapter 15: Fundamental Established Axioms
hese are as simpliied as I can make them, based on the work o
Robert-Arthur: Menard, Mary-Llizabeth: Crot and ,to some
extent \inston Shrout and Irene-Maus: Graenhorst,. A good
80 o it is their work, tweaked a bit by re-writing, and remoing the
unnecessary 'God' bits - thereby reducing it to absolute undamentals.
1
1, 'Lawul' is what it is all about. 'Lawul' .s. 'unlawul'. Neer get
trapped into discussing 'legal','illegal'. lor example, i you receie back a
response, which does not address the substance o your letter, then
inariably it will be attempting to inorm you o some 'statutory
obligation'. Some 'legal obligation' you are assumed to hae. ,1he
Respondent will be acting by rote, o course. Because that is the only
world inhabited by Organic Robots,. \ou hae no statutory or legal
obligations, unless you consent. 1hereore it is possible to respond along
the ollowing lines:
f ,ovr covv.et ba. beev aari.ivg ,ov ov tbe ba.i. of tbe fictiovat rorta of egate.e
ava tatvte., tbev .vgge.t tbat ,ov .bovta cov.iaer .ac/ivg biv or ber for tbe
eretratiov of a frava. or tbe .ivte rea.ov tbat tbe, are beivg gro..t, vegtigevt b,
igvorivg tbe reat rorta of Covvov ar, a. ,ov ritt ai.corer qvite .bortt,, .bovta ,ov
covtivve to vr.ve tbi. vatter ba.ea iv bi. or ber aarice.
bereb, gire ,ov ôtice tbat fvrtber corre.ovaevce iv tbi. vatter ritt be cbargea
at _:00 er tetter frov ve. f ,ovr covv.et aari.e. ,ov tbat cavvot ao tbat, tbev tbat
rovta .vort v, covtevtiov iv tbe reriov. aragrab.
;../ biv if be aoe. it. .va a./ biv rbat gire. biv tbe rigbt to ao it. 1be
av.rer i.: Covvov ar. 1bev get biv or ber to reaari.e ,ov accoraivgt,. 1o aari.e
,ov, for eavte, tbat ,ov veea to re.ova iv .vb.tavce, iv oraer to aroia ai.bovovr.
.va va/e .vre be or .be aari.e. ,ov tbat tbere i. .vcb a tbivg a. a Covvterctaiv. or
bara..vevt. .va tbat v vot afraia to v.e it)
. is the sort o thing. 1he Solicitor or Lawyer would then respond to
the Client: !ett, .vo.e, tbe, va, bare a oivt. t vigbt, .vo.e, be av iaea
to bvvovr tbev. ]v.t iv ca.e. bare beara a bit abovt Covvov ar, bvt v vot
terribt, av fait ritb tbat .iae of tbivg..
Send them a copy o this book,,
2, In order to empower a representatie, you must hae the power
yoursel. \ou cannot gie to anyone something you, yoursel do not
possess. \ou cannot gie them any more than you, yoursel, possess.
Consequently you can look at anything any representatie does, and say:
%*
Iundamental Lstablished Axioms
vv.t be evtittea to ao tbat v,.etf, ritbovt vece..arit, evorerivg .oveove et.e to
ao it for ve.
A good example o this is Peace Oicers. I you can empower your
representaties ,your Goernment, to create a Peace lorce ,they would
call it a Police lorce,, then you must hae the power to create a Peace
lorce o your own. Ater all, where does a People's Goernment's power
come rom - i not rom the People
3, In a democracy, 'a majority' does not depend on 'large numbers'. A
majority can be as low as one. And that one must, o itsel, ,thereore,
carry suicient empowerment to put any motion into practice. ,1he US
Supreme Court has 9 Members. A 5 - 4 majority carries any ruling. 1hat's
'democracy',
4, Consequent to Axiom 3, aboe, no Goernment has more power
than you do, yoursel. 1he powers are equal. 1he only dierence is that
your power is Inalienable - it can't be taken away rom you - whereas a
Goernment can be replaced by some other set o role players.
Consequently you are 'supreme'.
5, 'Requesting permission' is the act o a child. 'Licencing' is 'begging
or permission' and 'submitting to someone else's will'. Adults do not beg
permission or something they are lawully entitled to do, and prepared to
take ull responsibility or so doing. Anything or which a licence can be
granted must, by deinition, be undamentally lawul ,otherwise it would
be incapable o being licenced,, and there is, thereore, absolutely no need
or an adult to 'ask such permission'. 1he act o 'obtaining a licence' is the
act o throwing away a undamental Right, and substituting a ,reocable,
priilege instead.
6, 'Registration' o anything transers superior ownership to the entity
accepting the registration. Once an item has been registered, you are no
longer the O\NLR ,een though you will still be paying or the item,,
but instead you become the KLLPLR. 1his includes cars, houses,
children ,who become 'wards o the state' by irtue o a birth registration,,
etc. ,'regis ...' ~ handing ownership to 1he Crown ... which, by the way, is
the British Crown in 1emple Bar, and not Llizabeth II,.
Not coninced Perhaps you can think o it this way: \hat is the
beneit o registering anything
Oh! It makes it 'oicial'! But what, precisely, does that mean Does
registering:
1. Alter the size o anything
2. Alter the shape o anything
%)
3. Alter the colour o anything
4. Alter the alue o anything
No \ell . what does 'registration' do then \hat does 'making it
oicial' do lor you, I mean. lor you, the 'registrant' Not sure \ell, it
must do something, because it is - apparently - so important. Surely there
is only one possible answer. 'Registering' transers Ownership. Away rom
you, and to whoeer accepts the registration. \hat else could it possibly
do
I repeat: !bat et.e covta it o..ibt, ao.. ,Please don`t say: aov`t /vor,
because you know as much as anyone else,.
\hat are your beneits rom haing 'registered something' 1he only
one I can think o is 'reedom rom undue & unnecessary harassment'.
But that's hardly a beneit, surely In the case o cars, or example, the
'beneit o registering your car is that you get regular demands or the
payment o Road 1ax - because you are the Keeper ,check your V5, it
calls you the Keeper,, and no longer the Owner'.
But it is still up to you to pay or eerything, including the MO1 and all
sericing costs. 1his is a 'beneit' I this is considered a 'beneit', then it
sounds to me like someone is using the wrong dictionary.
\hat is the beneit o registering a child So that it can be pumped ull
o toxic accinations while it cannot in any way deend itsel At the time
when it must trust you most ,Check the ingredients o accines, they will
make your hair stand on end. Vaccinations do not work. 1hey are nothing
more than toxic,.
Registration so your child can be 'treated' by a General Practitioner
who is blindly ollowing the rules laid down by the British Medical
Association to create nothing more than 'consensus medicine' \here
each one does what all the others do - rightly or wrongly - such that none
o them can be picked out and sued or harmul practices Meanwhile
there are lolistic Practitioners who will oer actual cures ,without side
eects, and as opposed to just 'treatments',. I any o this is news to you,
check out the \ebSite o the Nurses Moement or Responsibility in
Medicine ,www.nmrm.org, or more inormation.
And then, o course, there is the 'beneit' o indoctrination rom the
age o 5 years. Sorry, I meant 'education'. Not indoctrination \ell, how
much o the contents o this book did you learn at school Did you learn
about the Grand Deceptions o Money, Legalese & Religion at school Or
did they just train you to be nothing more than a compliant workhorse, as
they did me
%!
Ater inishing ,let's say, 'schooling', your child will go out to work,
trailing his or her National Insurance Number all oer the place. 1his
allows your child to be taxed to the hilt. \hich is all a complete raud as
the Chapters on Money and Mass Mind Control and Lnslaement ully
explain.
Registration o cars and children hae beneits
Really
Registration o your car means the Goernment owns your car, and
you are the Keeper. And you hae all the expenses. Registration o your
child means the Goernment owns your child, and you are the Guardian.
And you hae all the expenses. ,But yes, you still get all the loe . unless
they decide to take your child away rom you . which they can, and do,
sometimes on the slightest pretext,. Registration o your house means the
Goernment owns your house, and you are the Occupier. And you hae
all the expenses. 1he Goernment can take back your house i you don't
leae it to a next o kin. 1he Goernment doesn't care. It will get it one
day. In the meantime you und all the upkeep.
, \hen parts o the Magna Carta were 'transerred' into Statutes what
was actually happening was that undamental Rights were being
transerred into revocable priileges. 1hus they were being watered
down. Diused. Being rendered powerless. loweer the Magna Carta
Statute did not reoke the Magna Carta Peace 1reaty, signed by John with
the Royal Seal in 1215. A Statute cannot do that. 1hus whateer parts
were let out o the Magna Carta Statute ,notably Article 61, creating the
right & duty o Lawul Rebellion,, and whateer parts o the Magna Carta
Statute hae been repealed, the entire original Magna Carta Peace 1reaty
1215 stands in perpetuity as an irreocable oundation o the Common
Law.
8, In all cases you are always being offered a service - which includes
'beneits' - in the orm o priileges. \ou are always ully entitled to waie
such serices, and o course you will also be waiing the attendant
beneits, as you so choose. \our choice is - ultimately - to either assert
your ,inalienable, Rights, or accept ,reocable, priileges.
9, Law can gie rise to a iction, but a iction cannot gie rise to Law.
Consequently a Legal liction called 1lL GOVLRNMLN1 has no
power to make Law. It is, in point o act, bound by Law ,like eeryone
else, and including all other Legal lictions,. PARLIAMLN1 is another
Legal liction entity. Statutes created by Parliament are not, thereore, the
Law. 1hey are 'legislated rules or a Society' and only applicable to the
Members o that Society. Join a dierent Society, and you would be
bound by a dierent set o rules. ,I this were not the case it would be
%"
impossible to become, or example, a lreemason and be bound by the
rules o lreemasonry,. Statutes are nothing more than the Company
Policy o 1lL UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION, or 1lL
UNI1LD S1A1LS Ol AMLRICA CORPORA1ION, etc. ,See 'Society',
below,
10, Only a soereign lesh and blood luman Being, with a liing soul,
has a Mind. Only something with a Mind is capable o deising a Claim.
Legal lictions are soulless, and do not possess a distinct Mind. 1hey
cannot, thereore, in Law, make a Claim.
11, Consequent to the oregoing, and since the Judiciary in a Court de
acto deries all its power rom colour-o-law,Statutes, then no Court de
acto has any power oer you as a soereign luman Being, in fact
,although, o course, they don't bother to tell you!,. A Court de jure is the
only kind o court to which you are subject under Common Law, and
there are ew o those let ,unless you insist that the Court operates de
jure, by demanding a 1rial by Jury. But they will attempt to resist that with
eery ibre in their 'corporate', soulless, 'bodies',. Courts de jure only tend
to exist as the ligher Courts, where ,or example, murder trials take
place. Neertheless the Magna Carta gies eeryone the Right to 1rial By
Jury - or: ... b, tbe taroftbeava ... which is Common Law, o course.
12, \ou, and your ellow Countrymen, constitute the entire and total
'wealth' o your country. 1he resources may be considered as assets, but
without you & your ellow Countrymen they are worthless. A ield must
be ploughed, and seeded, beore potatoes will grow. Once grown they
must be dug up, bagged, and transported beore they can do the
worthwhile job o sustaining lie. \ithout the eorts o you, and your
Countrymen, nothing can happen, and your Country itsel is a worthless
lump o soil.
13, A Society is, in essence, nothing more than a grouping o like-
minded souls, since it is deined as a number o people joined by mutual
consent to deliberate, determine and act or a common goal. A Society
makes its own rules, and its Members are duty-bound to ollow them.
Dierent Societies can exist, haing their own unique set o rules. One
way o 'choking' the action o a Court de acto is to claim Membership o
a Society that only exists in Common Law jurisdiction. 1he \orld
lreeman Society ,Google it, has been set up precisely or this purpose.
14, Contractual Obligation. lor any Contract to be lawul it must
comprise the ollowing:
A, Iull Disclosure by both Parties. Neither Party can later claim 'you
should hae known' i it was not speciically declared at the time o
making the Contract.
%#
B, Lqual Considerations oered by both Parties, this being the
subject o the exchange. It must be a sum o money, or an item o alue.
Both Parties agree that their Consideration is worth ,to them, the other
Party's Consideration. 1he Considerations, once agreed, must be ixed -
otherwise they cannot remain 'equal'.
C, Lawful 1erms & Conditions or the Contract, to which both
Parties agree. 1hese should rest entirely on Common Law.
D, Manifestations of Intent by both Parties, such as 'wet'
,handwritten, signatures, or some conduct or perormance which shows
'Intent to Contract'.
Len though businesses and oicials act as though there is a lawul
contract in place, 99 times out o 100 these rules hae not been ollowed.
,Maybe it is 999 times out o 1,000 - or een more!,. Standing on these
our rules, requesting Proos, is the simplest way o stalemating just about
eery action that may be taken against you. ,See Axiom 16, below,
15. Agreement to Pay. Consequent to Axiom 14, aboe, all 'payment
demands', that could result in court actions against you, can be stopped by
'conditionally agreeing to pay the sum demanded', subject to Proos that
the our rules were ollowed in the irst place. ,Make sure you send this
letter by registered post, heading it Notice of Conditional Agreement
and including 'Without Prejudice' in a suitable place,. In almost all cases
no Proos are possible ,because the rules were neer ollowed lawully,.
loweer, by 'agreeing to pay' you hae remoed all Controersy. 1hus
a court action, which is only there to adjudicate on Controersy, cannot
take place. I you receie a Summons, you can write back ,registered!,
with a copy o your Conditional Agreement to Pay, subject to the Proos
being presented. 1he Court should consider that any urther action is
'riolous', i.e. a complete waste o its time, since there is no Controersy
on which it can adjudicate. ,1he Court may een consider whoeer
applied to be in contempt,. ,See Axiom 16, below,
16. feet gvitt,, becav.e ore tbe vove,. too/ it ava .evt it. No, you
don't owe a damn thing! \hen taking out the loan, you were 'loaned'
back what was yours in the irst place. \ou created the 'money' when you
signed the Loan or Credit Application. By doing so, you gave them a
Negotiable Instrument called 'the money'. 1hey cashed this in,,, and then
used that to loan you back your own money. \ou don't owe a damn thing!
1hey owe you - an apology at the ery least - or applying this conidence
trick on you - and or chasing you or something you already gae them!
, Actually they just could hae walked away with your cash. But they
didn't, because they are greedy, greedy, greedy, greedy. 1hey knew they
%$
could get you to pay eerything back, and also to pay them Interest on top
o that. 1hus they had already been paid in full once, when they
cashed in on your money, they took a risk by oering it back to you, and
reckoned on being paid twice or even more, ia the Interest. Are you
just beginning to eel slightly less sympathetic I not, I don't know what
else to say, except maybe to Google Move, a. Debt, the superb animation
by Paul Gringnon, which explains the entire process step by step, and
how it all came about, historically,.
1. 'Responsibility' .s. 'Authority'. \ou can delegate Authority, but
you can only share Responsibility. In other words, i you task ,delegate,
someone to do something, you still retain the responsibility or getting it
done, and or anything that may happen as a result. I, or example, a
Police Oicer carries out any order, gien by a superior, then that oicer
is personally responsible or what may occur as a result, and all those up
the chain of command are considered accomplices, in Law.
,1hat's what the Nuremberg 1rials were all about,.
1hereore it is important that, i you delegate Authority, you delegate to
the right indiidual or group o indiiduals. \ou delegate to an indiidual
who will accomplish the task without come-backs. And who you choose
is your choice, and always remains your Responsibility.
18. A Solicitor or Lawyer has his or her first duty to the Court & the
public, not to the Client. In this situation, in Court, they are considered
to be an 'adult', and the Client is considered to be 'a ward o the Court'. A
ward o the Court is considered to be a 'non-comprehending child'. \ith
good reason, i you think about it. Actually the Client's status is, in
essence, that o an 'imbecilic child'. And, urthermore, because the irst
duty is to the Court, and thereore its jurisdiction, the 'imbecilic child' has
immediately tacitly consented to Statute Law jurisdiction in the Legalese
world o illusion. ,Unless you get this totally straight with the Solicitor or
Lawyer at the outset. loweer you will go a long way beore inding a
compliant one,.
%%
Signatures
Chapter 16: Signatures
o not sign anything unless you intend to Contract. 1his sounds
obious but it is not obious. Not signing anything includes
letters o rebuttal. D
1he reason is simple. In this day and age countereiting your Signature
is perectly possible. And it happens. And has happened.
Obiously the countereiting mechanism will not be perect, but a
luman's Signature Mark aries oer time.
It is one thing to say, in Court: 1bat .igvatvre i. a forger,, but it is
another thing to proe it, unless you are prepared to pay the ees o a
landwriting Lxpert.
It may be that you can show, by means o other correspondence, that
you neer had any intention to Contract. A Court may, or may not, accept
this reasoning. 1he best thing to do is to not let anyone get a specimen o
your Signature.
1here are a number o possible tricks. \ou could get a riend to sign
the bottom o a document. 1his would be a sure way o proing a orgery
and consequent perjury.
Another way suggested is to aix a stamp, and sign oer the top o it,
thereby making it ery hard to extract that section o your actual
Signature.
Another possibility is to print a complicated graphic as a Signature Box,
and make your mark inside it.
Another possibility is to use a Rubber Stamp with some miscellaneous
pattern on it.
linally it is possible to simply not sign it.
%&
Chapter 17: Courts & Proceedings
eore going any urther it is necessary to explain the Courts. 1here
are two kinds, known as a 'Court de jure' and a 'Court de acto'.
'De jure' means 'o Justice', thus a Court de jure is a Court o
Justice. 'De acto' means 'o act'. It is. It just 'is' ,established,. But that's
it. It is a priate concern proiding an arbitration serice. ,Supposedly
independent, but with the oerall desire - as do all priate concerns - to
simply make a proit,.
B
A Court o Justice will be operating under Common Law ,i.e. will hae
Common Law jurisdiction,. 1rials will take place. In ront o a Jury,
whose erdict is sacrosanct. 1he Judge is not allowed to sway the erdict
o a Jury. I he or she tries, then you would need to intercede. 1he Jury
may return a erdict o: ôt gvitt, i they consider they would hae done
the same thing in your shoes at the time, irrespectie o what 'the Law'
might demand. 1he Jury would need to be told this by you. 1hese days, it
is unlikely that the Judge will explain this to the Jury ,it is all part o the
Grand Deception, designed to suppress justice in the orm o Jury 1rials,.
A Judge will generally explain the law ,as he or she sees it!, to the Jury,
and not point out that the true job o the Jury is actually to make the
Law, in the specific circumstances of the case in hand. Courts de jure
are ery rare these days. Only the lighest Courts unction 'de jure' and, as
I said, they are rarely directed properly.
Generally speaking you will receie Summonses or Courts de acto.
\ou will get ery little 'justice' in a Court de acto. Its entire grounding is
based on the illusion o money. lence the possibilities or corruption are
in-built and endless. \hat is a Court de acto Nothing more than a
priate Company, publicly trading. \ou will be able to obtain a Credit
Report on it, ia Dun & Bradstreet.
Back in the 11
th
, 12
th
and 13
th
centuries these Courts eoled as priate
businesses, oering the serice o supposed-impartial adjudication. lor a
ee. 1he idea was to reduce Controersies settled at sword-point. It was,
howeer, due to some ery strange adjudications ,presumably based on
backhanders . always the possibility when ees` are inoled, o course!,
that sparked o the ultimate conrontation, in 1215, at Runnymede. 1here
comes a point ,does there not, where enough is enough`. I beliee we
are, yet again, at such a point in the 21
st
century.
%'
Courts & Proceedings
In a Court de acto there will be three ,generally, 'adjudicators' sitting as
a 'panel', or 'bench'. 1hey will either call themseles Magistrates or Judges
,Judges in the ligher Courts,.
A Court de acto does not hae Common Law jurisdiction. It is only
allowed to adjudicate on the basis o Statutes ,which are actually Maritime
Law,. It is, thereore, an Admiralty Court, in act. In such a Court there
will be a learing, not a 1rial.
I, ater haing had correspondence with the Organic Robots, they still
persist in Court action, you hae a number o options. 1he Court will
almost certainly be a Court de acto. \ou will be able to tell by looking at
what you hae been accused o breaching. I it is a Speeding or Parking
oence, then that will come rom a Statute, and not rom Common Law.
I you harmed another luman Being, or caused them a loss, or
breached the peace, or are accused o derauding them, then the charge
will probably be a Common Law charge, and the best thing you could do
would be the ight it normally ,plead guilty or not guilty, and place your
case in ront o a Jury,.
Anything else, including when accused o derauding ,say, the State, or
any o its Agencies, would be a charge under Statute, and you can ight it
by means o the avte 1evtate. gien in the Appendices. And - where
necessary - ultimately claiming Common Law jurisdiction ,as explained
below,.
1he steps to take are irstly to rebut the Summons. 1his is discussed in
the Chapter on ôtice., vritatiov. c vvvov.e. - the methodology being to
initially send your own Notice back to the Court. 1hey are unlikely to
respond in substance, which then places the Court themseles in
dishonour. And this is something you can point out since, in Law: e
rbo ai.bovovr., to.e..
I it looks like they hae ignored your Notice, then you will need to
ight.
1he next step is then to send the Court copies o all correspondence,
pointing out that you hae oered Conditional Agreement, and thus you
see no Controersy. \ou also demand that all your correspondence
should be placed into the Magistrate's or Judge's eidence, i the learing
actually goes ahead.
\ou may get back a reply saying: Ca.e ritbararv. 1his will happen
only i whoeer you are dealing with has a grain o sense, and does not
hae a brain the size o a pea.
%(
Consequently you will not get that reply i they are all being a stupid as
each other. ,Organic Robots can be like that, especially in these Common
Purpose days,.
So it may, ultimately, be necessary to actually attend the learing.
Primarily to ensure that, i the learing goes ahead, and your Common
Law claim ails, then your correspondence is read out.
\ou cannot aord to trust anyone other than yoursel.
loweer, it still may not get to that. I you arrie a hal-hour beore
the time stated, then there will be an Usher or Clerk outside the Court.
Lxplaining that you are only present in order to make a Special
Appearance, in order to establish jurisdiction, because you will not be
crossing the Bar, into their ship(*), and will be: Claiming Common
Law jurisdiction ava will not be accepting any offers of services, and
will be waiving all the benefits is likely to send said person into a tizzy.
Lspecially i you draw attention to the correspondence that you would use
as your eidence.
, It`s an Admiralty Court!,.
\ou are likely to be told that all o this: . ba.ete.., or: a. vo tegat
ba.i. or .tavaivg. 1he response is that: ab.otvtet, agree tbat it i. tegatt,
ba.ete.., borerer it ba. .O|1 .!| .tavaivg and is not,
thereore, in any way 'LA\lULL\ baseless'. And that is the important
aspect. And the only important aspect.
I told the Magistrates & the Court hae statutory obligation` o any
kind, the response is: t va, rer, rett be tbe ca.e tbat ,ovr Covav, ba. .ove
.tatvtor, obtigatiov a. a art of it. bv.ive.. ractice.. orerer, a. a orereigv vvav
eivg, av vvaer vo obtigatiov rbat.oerer to accet av, .errice. av, Covav, va,
bare ov offer, ava tbat ivctvae. tbe .a;vaicatiov errice roriaea b, ,ovr Covav,.
Obiously: !bat ao ,ov veav, re are vot a Covav,!, is countered with:
Ob ,e. ,ov are. . rirate Covav, actiret, traaivg. Do ,ov vot erev /vor rbo, or
rbat, ,ov actvatt, ror/ for..
\ou must always remain reasonably polite, but irm, not be intimidated
by anyone, or anything, and be prepared to say it like it is`. ,You may
have to insist. 1hey. Don't. Like. It. Up 'em!,
1he likelihood o this going any urther is ery small. One likely
possibility is that, ater consultation with 'a Superior', it has been decided
to adjourn the learing. ,Note: 1his is beore you hae stepped into the
Courtroom,. \ou could then ask or 1rael Lxpenses, i that's the case.
\ou are likely to get a letter, within a day or so, saying the case has
been withdrawn ,they won't tell you why,.
&*
I you don't, then you may hae to go through the whole rigmarole
again, on the Adjournment Date. I the amount on the case is not large,
then they hae a large incentie to just gie up on you, as in: !bat tbe
bett. !e cavt riv erer, .ivgte ove! .va tbi. ove i.vt goivg to be rer, rofitabte.
\es, there is a 'wearing down' actor that is on your side.
linally, howeer, you may actually end up in Court. In the actual
learing itsel. \hen you hear your name, you approach the outer reaches
o the Court and say: av bere va/ivg a PC. .PP.R.^C iv
oraer to 1. ]|RDC1O^. ctaiv v, vatievabte vvav Rigbt to
Covvov ar ;vri.aictiov, ava DO Ô1 CO^^1 1O CO^1R.C1 for
av, R1C ,ov va, bare ov OR, ava !.1 . 1
^1.
Do not say anything else. I any question is put to you, repeat the exact
same mantra.
I you are told that you will be in Contempt o Court i you repeat that
mantra once more, then ask: !ovta tbat be C1 CO^1MP1, or
CRM^. CO^1MP1..
1hen do not say any more, except to repeat that second mantra i any
question is put to you.
I they respond: Cirit, ,the most likely, then ask: !bere i. tbe Covtract.
bare vaae vo Covtract ritb ,ov. .ecificatt, .tatea tbat refv.ea att ,ovr
Covtractvat Offer..
1hey might then change it to: Crivivat, in which case the response is:
!bat i. tbe CRM, rbo va/e. tbe C.M, ava rbo i. tbe ^]|RD
P.R1Y..
1hey might just hae a inal go: 1be Covrt ;or Crorv Pro.ecvtiov errice, or
Mivi.tr, of ]v.tice, or rbaterer) va/e. tbe Ctaiv, to which the response is:
Yov /vor tbat ovt, a vvav eivg cav aeri.e a Ctaiv.
At this point the Court has completely run out o possibilities, because
there is no Injured Party, anyway.
I, on the other hand, the proceedings still continue, make sure your
correspondence is read into eidence.
I you eentually lose, then it was a total Kangaroo Court, and they
were 'totally out to get you, by hook or by crook'. \hateer you would
hae done would hae had the same result. In this case you would need to
appeal ia a Judicial Reiew or present a Case Stated, in order to get the
Kangaroo Decision quashed. 1he ery last thing to do is to gie up. A
ligher Court would almost certainly quash it on a technicality.
&)
A lreedom o Inormation Request was made to a Magistrates Court in
the ligh Peaks area. 1he question was posed: .re ,ov a Covrt ae ;vre, or a
Covrt ae facto.. 1he answer receied was: !e ao vot vvaer.tava tbe qve.tiov.
So, in essence we hae the act that the Courts don't een know what
they are, and lie in the Legalese world o illusion.
Based on experience, and what has been said aboe, one possibility
might be a conersation with the Clerk or Usher outside the Courtroom
,please do not dismiss the likelihood o this, it is more than likely and -
anyway - what is there to lose,:
cv.e ve, i. tbi. a Covrt ae ;vre or a Covrt ae facto.
beg ,ovr araov.
a./ea if tbi. ra. a Covrt ae ;vre or a Covrt ae facto.
v, .orr,, aovt /vor rbat ,ov veav
. Covrt of ]v.tice, or a Covrt of .a;vaicatiov
!ett, errr ... .vo.e a Covrt of ]v.tice
o ritt tbere be a ]vr,, tbev.
. ]vr,. ô ... tbere rovt be a ]vr,
or cav it be a Covrt of ]v.tice, tbev.
rrr ... rett .vo.e it vv.t tbe otber /iva ,ov vevtiovea
. Covrt ae facto. !itb earivg. iv.teaa of 1riat..
Ob! Ye. ... tbere ritt be a earivg!
o it. a Covrt ae facto, tbev.
Ye., tbat. tbe ca.e
!ett rb, aia ,ov tett ve it ra. a Covrt of ]v.tice, tbev. Ob, rett, verer viva, iv
tbat ca.e refv.e it. offer of tbe .errice of arbitratiov, ava raire att tbe bevefit.
beg ,ovr araov.
aovt cov.evt to av, .rbitratiov errice. revaiv iv Covvov ar ;vri.aictiov.
v ovt, .vb;ect to Covrt. ae ;vre. i/e re att are if re reati.e it
!bat ao ,ov veav ... ,ov are ovt, .vb;ect to Covrt. ae ;vre.
!bat .aia. o rovta ,ov be .o /iva a. to a, v, eev.e. for covivg, .ivce v
bere vvaer fat.e retevce., _10 ritt .vffice, ava tt be ov v, ra,
Ov ,ovr ... rbat ao ,ov veav fat.e retevce..
!ett, rbat Covvov ar bare bro/ev.
&!
aovt vvaer.tava ... tt bare to .ea/ ritb v, verior ...
Ye., tbat. a gooa iaea. Ma,be be /vor. rbat /iva of a covrt it i.. bare to .a,
tbat fiva it a tittte atarvivg tbat ,ov .it tbere aoivg rbat ,ov ao ava ,ov aiavt
erev /vor rbat /iva of covrt it ra.. certaivt, boe ,ovr verior /vor. ...
,Comes back,
!e aovt veea ,ovr cov.evt to tbi. earivg ...
beg ,ovr araov ... aia bear ,ov .a, ,ov aovt veea v, cov.evt.
Ye., re aovt veea ,ovr cov.evt
or cav tbat be.
!ett, aovt reatt, /vor ... tbat. rbat re beev tota ...
1bev tea.e be .o /iva a. to go bac/ to rboerer tota ,ov tbat ava oivt ovt re are
att eqvat vvaer tbe aroftbeava, ava if ,ov aovt veea v, cov.evt, tbev aovt
veea ,ov to roriae av, .rbitratiov errice
,Goes away to re-coner ... comes back,
1bere .eev. to be a tittte robtev. Yovr earivg ba. beev aa;ovrvea for a vovtb
ôr beg ,ovr araov!
1be,re aa;ovrvea it for a vovtb
1o gire tbev.etre. tive to tvrv tbi. ivto a Covrt ae ;vre. 1be, cav ao tbat iv ;v.t
ove vovtb.
aovt /vor abovt tbat
!ett, ritb att ave re.ect, rovta ,ov tea.e be .o /iva a. to fiva ovt abovt tbat.
.fter att, v bere, tbe covrt i. bere, ,ov are bere, ,ovr verior i. bere, rb, ao re
veea av aa;ovrvvevt.
tt go ava fiva ovt
Ye., tbav/ ,ov
,Goes away to re-coner ... yet again ... comes back,
\ou could ery easily be looking at: Ca.e ritbararv.
1here is nothing to stop you haing this conersation well beore the
date o the learing. Just go down to the Court and ask the same
questions, adjusting what you say accordingly.
Solicitors, Lawyers and Notaries lie entirely in the world o illusory
Legalese, and almost eery sentence they write can, under careul scrutiny,
be shown that they are double-thinking, and attempting to compute
iction with act, totally unsuccessully. An example I heard o was: !bev
&"
,ov rere borv ,ovr arevt. gare ,ov a vave. 1be, regi.terea ,ovr birtb, ava ,ov are,
tberefore, Mr. tab tab.
lirst o all the parents do not register the birth. 1he Goernment
Agency, known as 1he Registrar o Birth & Deaths, registers the birth.
1he parents merely proide the requisite inormation. 1he parents merely
inorm. So strike that one out.
Secondly the Solicitor admits, in the irst sentence, that the subject was
gien` a Name, by the parents. 1hat indicates the llesh & Blood, and the
Name, are obiously two totally dierent things that became attached,
ollowing the birth. So here the Solicitor is using Common Sense, without
realising it, and desperately trying to draw the ictional conclusion in the
second sentence. le is thus completely contradicting himsel. Strike two
out.
lurthermore, wheneer asked to gie or conirm your Name and Date
o Birth you are expressing hearsay in Court. \ou only hae your parent's
and Birth Certiicate's word or those two things. \ou only 'know' these
things by hearsay. And hearsay eidence is not allowed in a Court.
So, in essence we hae the act that Judges, Solicitors, Lawyers and
Notaries, etc., do not know what they doing, and what they are talking
about.
And we hae a orce o Policymen who do not comprehend the
immense dierence between Common Law ,lawul, and Company Policy
,legal,.
Is it really any wonder there is so much trouble all round
&#
Liability & 1he Ultimate Sanctions
Chapter 18: Liability & The Ultimate Sanctions
he ast majority o 'oences' ,they are not actually 'oences', but
Statute iolations`, o course, inole 'money'. Speciically: 1be
vova,vevt of it. 1
1he Chapter on Move, explains how it does not exist in reality, and is
nothing more than a Belie System. lor this reason the most that can eer
be extracted rom you is 'belie in something you alue', in other words
your Credit Rating, or your Liberty.
\hile the Monetary System is king, a Credit Rating can be assumed to
hae alue. loweer, I hae to say that, in my own case, I paid o my
Credit Card in the early 1980s ,ACCLSS Card, i you can remember
them,, and cut it up. I did this because I realised I was on a hiding to
nothing.
And I'e neer used a Credit Card since ,een though I'e been
constantly bombarded with junk mail oering them to me,.
But that's me. loweer, it does explain why I, personally, hae no idea
what my Credit Rating is, and I really don't care. It's not something I
consider to hae any alue. I I want something, I wait until I can aord
it, and buy it. It is as simple as that.
But that did not stop the Inland Reenue rom placing me in ,what
they called, 'Notional Debt', and proceeding against me into bankruptcy
,because I did not consider I owed them anything,. And it did not stop
the Margaret 1hatcher Goernment rom proceeding against me, and
placing me in prison or reusing to pay her Poll 1ax.
So I write all this on the basis o two personal experiences. lirstly,
being made bankrupt and losing any Credit Rating I had. And secondly,
spending time in prison and losing my Liberty or a while.
And, having actually experienced all that, I firmly believe NONL
of it would have happened if I had known then, what I know now:
1he Ireeman Principles. I am absolutely positive I could hae
stopped both actions against me, dead in their tracks. I know what was
said at the time, because I was there. And I now know what I could hae
said, but didn't - entirely due to lack o knowledge.
Len without this knowledge I did - in point o act - hae two
successes`. Guided purely by Common Sense I ought both by simply not
co-operating. 1he result was that the Local Council neer bothered me
&$
again ,because, I presume, they had come to realise it wasn`t worth the
eort . ater all I did tell them that on a number o occasions,, and the
Inland Reenue neer bothered me again, or ,I assume, the same, or
similar, reason. \hich proes, to me at least, that when they operate by
rote they may win the battle, but they don`t win the war.
loweer, any procedure against you is always in two stages:
1. 1o establish Liability, and make a corresponding Court Order against
you or the amount demanded,
2. lailure to pay the amount demanded, within the stated timescale,
inokes a new Summons to demand that you be placed into bankruptcy,
or into prison. \hich o these demands is made, depends on the
circumstances ,the Statutes,.
In the case o Council 1ax, or example, they will demand a prison
sentence or non-payment. 1he sanction being to take away your Liberty.
1his is because it would be pointless making you bankrupt ... because they
would hae no means o making any urther demands on you until the
bankruptcy expires. ,And we can`t hae that, can we!,. Until this
subsequent learing has taken place no prison sentence has been
passed on you, and so there is no way you could actually be carted o to
prison. 1here has to be a sentence passed beore they can do that.
In this case, which is a Ciil Oence, you can extricate yoursel rom
the whole situation at any time by paying up. Len i you get as ar as
prison. 1hey will take the length o the sentence, and diide it into the
amount, and come up with 'an amount per day incarcerated'. As each
incarcerated day passes, that amount is written o. 1he remainder will
always buy you out. On the last day o your sentence it has all been
written o, and you are ree once more. ,1here is no parole or a Ciil
Oence,.
In the case o ailure to pay, or example, Income 1ax, the likelihood is
that they would go or bankruptcy. 1he idea being that they can take your
house, to pay o their 'Notional Debt' ,'notional', because 'money' is an
illusion,. 1hey would tend not to worry about the act that they could not
grab anything rom you or a while ,i.e. until the bankruptcy has been
discharged,, on the basis o creaming as much as possible this one-time.
'Long-sightedness' is not one o their stronger points. ,Otherwise they
wouldn`t be doing their job in the irst place!,. I you co-operate with the
Oicial Deceier ,Receier,, then a bankruptcy is auto-discharged ater 3
years. ,But they won`t bother to tell you, quite probably,. ,It may een be
2 years by now,.
&%
Liability & 1he Ultimate Sanctions
loweer, the oerall point here is the Second Phase. Lither the
Incarceration Petition or the Bankruptcy Petition. Nothing can happen to
you until this Second Phase has been successully accomplished by
whomsoeer is making the demand.
All too oten people do not realise what is actually going on, and what
is happening, and that there are these two, distinct, phases. And that both
can be challenged by Common Law jurisdiction. I the Liability Petition is
dismissed because the Court is 'de acto', and does not hae Common law
jurisdiction, then the Ultimate Sanction Phase cannot occur.
&&
Chapter 19: The Law-of-Waters
n the Chapter on Covvov ar it was explained that Common Law is
the Law-o-the-Land. It is the only Law-o-the-Land. And the only
Law that needs to be obeyed on dry land. It ully deines peaceul co-
existence within its principles. Nothing can go wrong where eeryone
adheres to the Law-o-the-Land.
I
Nothing else is necessary. Adherence to Common Law gies eeryone
total reedom, proided they remain honourable, and is capable o coming
down like a ton o bricks on anyone who deiates rom honourable,
peaceul, co-existence.
So, what the hell has Parliament been doing, then Since it was all
sorted out in the 11
th
, 12
th
and 13
th
centuries
\hat a bloody good question!
1he answer is that, drien by the Banksters, it has been ery slowly, and
in the most subtle manner, ingraining the Grand Deceptions. It has been
doing this by ully-utilising the gullible nature o Mankind in general.
It could be argued that while the Law-o-the-Land sorts out what
happens on dry land, but what happens on water Don't we need a Law-
o-\aters, to take account o the high seas
Common Sense should tell anyone that the answer is possibly: ô.
1hat the Common Law still works perectly well on the high seas, because
it undamentally addresses the luman Condition ,honour, dishonour, etc,
and lumans on the high seas should still remain honourable.
One the other hand there are such things a Pirates, and Salage, and
also dierent Cultures, and so on. And you can't reasonably expect Pirates
to be honourable, and you can't expect to impose your own Law-o-the-
Land on to some other culture's Law-o-their-Land. 1here will be
remarkable similarities, but there may be Religious dierences ,which they
hae to contend with, poor souls, and you do not,.
So it is reasonable to assume that a Law-o-\aters - which needs to be
ully International, contending with the aspirations o all dierent
Cultures - is something that needs to be created and mutually agreed.
Sure, that's all ery ine & dandy. It's ine to create some Law
applicable on waters . but to impose that same Law on dry land Oh,
come on! No-one would all or that one, would they
&'
1he Law-of-Waters
Lrrr . well . yes, by subteruge eeryone ell or that one, and can
be most ocierous in supporting the irrationality! 1ry explaining to a
Policeman that he or she swore, on Oath, to uphold the Law-o-the-Land.
And, by bleating on about Statutes, he or she is imposing the Law-o-
\aters on dry land. 1he act that the Police hae a duty to understand
this, and are grossly negligent i they do not - actually committing serious
crimes i they do not - is something that passes completely under their
radar.
loweer beore you, the Reader, get the impression that I hae an axe
to grind with regard to Policemen, it might be an idea to correct that
assumption.
\hen in the course o their duties, they uphold the Law-o-the-Land,
in accordance with their Oath o Serice, they are acting as Peace
Oicers. In that role I hae as much admiration and respect or them as
anyone else. Someone needs to do that job. Someone, some group, some
orce, needs to impose the Principles o Common Law on those who
choose to act outside its boundaries. 1his is or my protection, as well as
eeryone else.
It is only when they exceed their jurisdiction, and the authority ested
in them ia their Oath o Serice, that I ,and most, by Common Sense, I
think, hae a problem with the way they act. Just the mere act o stopping
and questioning someone, without lawul excuse, is astly exceeding their
Common Law jurisdiction, and that is without considering their
inolement in traic ,or example,.
On the other hand they do things that I would not wish to do. Picking
up torn limbs resulting rom road traic accidents, or example. I salute
them, and all the Lmergency Serices, in that respect.
Acting as Peace Oicers is what they are paid to do. I hae no problem
with that, and welcome it. Acting as Company Policy Lnorcement
Oicers ,Policymen,, enorcing the Law-o-\aters on dry land, and not
realising it, and making absolutely no attempt to realise it, is where they
hae no authority, no jurisdiction, and are behaing in a grossly negligent
manner.
1hat's where the problem arises or me. And urthermore I suggest
that, deep down within their Common Sense, most people eel the same,
without actually being able to put their inger on it. So now you know.
\hen acting as Policymen, they are enorcing the Company Rules o a
Company you did not een realise you were working or. No wonder you
were conused!
&(
Common Law proides the uninhibited Right to 1rael. Actually across
National Boundaries without the need for any kind of Passport, as it
happens.
Common Law says the ollowing are crimes: Injuring someone, or
causing them loss.
I you are traelling at 90 mph on a Motorway, and you get rom A to
B, what injury hae you caused \hat loss hae you caused \hat crime
hae you committed Answer: None.
Ah! Ah! Ah! 1he Policymen will say: vt ,ov covta bare bvrt .oveove! o
tbere! Cavt bare ,ov o..ibt, bvrtivg .oveove! êea to boo/ ,ov. ]v.t aoivg ovr ;ob!
lirstly i you pick up a knie, to cut a sandwich, you could easily hurt
someone, i you dropped it. \ou could hurt yoursel, or someone standing
near you. las no-one eer accidentally dropped something No Neer
happened
lor crying out loud! Gie oer! 1he potential or harm is eer present.
24,! 1he potential. But, because most o us actually know what we are
doing, the potential doesn't normally turn into a reality.
I the potential eer turns into reality, then we hae, indeed, committed
a crime and the Law should, indeed, be brought to bear on us. 1hat's
precisely what the Law-o-the-Land is or! 1o rein in those who cause
harm or loss to others, due to irresponsibility.
But going rom A to B at 90 mph is not irresponsible. I it is, then
going rom A to B at 0 mph is almost as irresponsible. \hat's the
dierence 20 bloody mph! Duh!
Most people understand this by Common Sense. 1hat's why you can be
doing 0 mph on a UK Motorway, and cars whizz by you. No-one is
particularly concerned. I'm certainly not. People are just relying totally on
their own Common Sense, and basically saying: oa tbe .tviait, of
tatvte..
It's a orm o 'oting with your eet'. You always have that vote.
,I this doesn't tell the UK Parliament, and its jobsworth Policymen,
'something', I'm not sure what eer will. Actually I think it does. None o
the cameras seem to work, and on a 4-hour journey recently, I did not see
one Policyman,.
Statutes are the Company Policy o 1lL UNI1LD KINGDOM
CORPORA1ION. 1hey are the Law-o-\aters being applied on dry
land. 1hat's OK i you consent. But not, i you don't! Various other
names are the same thing: Law Merchant, Commerce Law, Lquity Law,
'*
1he Law-of-Waters
lleet Law, Maritime Law . you-name-it Law . just arious speciality
laours o the Law-o-\aters.
In point of fact there are only two jurisdictions: Common Law
and the Uniform Commercial Code. And they co-exist side-by-side.
1he Uniorm Commercial Code applies worldwide, and determines what
happens when transactions in Sales o Goods ,or a Sales o the Leases o
Goods, takes place. 1hat's it. 'Goods' must be movable.
Consequently Real Lstate transactions ,they are not 'goods', because
they are not moable,, and all Services all under Common Law, the
Law-o-the-Land. 1hereore the Serice proided by the Courts and the
Police should be one o Peace Keeping under Common Law principles,
and nothing more.
It`s pretty easy to see why this should come about. 1he Law-o-\aters,
as a Uniorm Commercial Code ,worldwide, proides 1rading Standards
or Goods moed between Nations . oer interening seaways. But how
on earth could Uniorm Commercial Standards be applied to Serices,
taking place on dry lands, but split across a seaway low can diners be
located in Lngland, while the waiters ,proiding the Serice, be located in,
say, lrance 1he only thing applicable to the manner in which those
Serices are proided, is the Law-o-the-Land ,the customs & traditions,
within which the restaurant, the diners, the kitchen sta and the waiters
are all located.
Returning to water`s connotations or a moment, in anticipation o our
acquiescence to be duped, and to remain duped, by the application o the
Law-o-\aters on dry land, many words in common usage hae been
adopted. All hae associations with water.
Banks ~ the two sides o a rier, which contain the low o water, the
current. \hich lends itsel to the word 'currency' to determine the low o
'money'.
1he idea that, when your mother's waters broke, you came down the
Birth Canal, and can thereore be considered to be a small 'ship'. Because
o this you were gien a Berth Certiicate ,although, to hide this, they
write it 'Birth', but the pronunciation is exactly the same,, because you can
be considered to be a small ship 'at berth'. A 'berth' being the place where
a ship is moored.
I you are called into a Court, you will be expected to stand in the
Dock. A Dock is also another name or where a ship is moored. 1he basic
idea is that, i a ship is impounded ,in a Dock,, then the Owner will
appear to sort the situation out. 1his is synonymous with you, as a
luman Being, being the Owner o your Legal liction 'ship'. And when
')
you 'appear to sort the situation out' they can hae your body, and do
what they like with it. lor example, cu you and send you to prison,
should they decide there is a necessity to do that.
More 'water' association comes rom the 'ship-associated' words in our
language: Citizenship, Relationship, Courtship, Ladyship, Lordship,
\orship ,\arship \horeship Actually rom \orthship ... but at all
seems to amount to the same thing, rom what I hae seen,, Ownership,
etc.
1here are just ar too many co-incidences or these water-associations
to be accidental, or random in any way. Indeed, een giing people the
pseudo-title 'Oicer', is indicatie o a ship's personnel.
And that's the way it is.
'!
Names
Chapter 20: Names
only that were true that: tic/. ava .tove. va, brea/ v, bove., bvt
vave. ritt verer bvrt ve!. \ou will, I hope, understand why I write that
by the time you'e read this Chapter. I
lor the simple reason that You are not your Name. \our Name was
'gien' to you . usually by your parents. But, i you think hard about it,
what - precisely - is a Name
It is a word. Or, more speciically, a group o words. It consists o the
word you were 'gien' by your parents ,they may hae 'gien' you more
than one,, and the name o a amily into which you were born i.e. your
lamily Name.
1hese are nothing more than words. 1hey can be written on paper,
and can be sounded by someone speaking. I you hear your name spoken,
or you see it written, you assume you must respond to it. \ou assume
\ou, \our luman Sel, \our llesh & Blood, \our Soereign Soul .
must respond to it. 1his is a mega-deception.
Do you not see an enormous dierence between \our luman Sel,
\our llesh & Blood, \our Soereign Soul . and some marks made on a
piece o paper Or sound pressure waes in the air
No \ell, let's hae another go then. lae you eer heard o a Deed
Poll I would guess you probably hae. \hat does it do It allows you to
change your Name. 1o any collections o words you choose. \ou are
saying: M, vvav etf, M, te.b c tooa, M, orereigv irivg ovt, ritt
bevcefortb ovt, re.ova to tbi. ver cottectiov of rora., rbetber rrittev or .o/ev.
1hat's what a Deed Poll does. And this could only happen i it were
possible to DL1ACl one set o words to respond to ,your original
Name,, and to A11ACl an alternatie set o words to which you
henceorth respond ,your newly-chosen Name,.
'Names' are attached! 1hey are attached to lesh and blood, purely or
conenience.
Imagine a amily with three children. 1he parents decided not to bother
to name them. So, when one child is naughty, the parent shouts: to
aoivg tbat!. All three would turn to look, to see which child the parent was
looking at. le or she would then hae to say: Do ,ov veav ve..
I think you will ind that, a long, long, time ago ,in a ar-o galaxy, it
was decided that - or conenience - leshes and bloods should be told
'"
i.tev: !beverer , or av,ove et.e, .a,. tbi. rora, veav ,ov. OK.. And the
child would - eentually - comprehend. O course, it isn't done like that in
practice. It's done the same way we do with domestic pets. Repetition. So
they get used to the sound. But the practical conenience, behind the
process, is exactly the same.
\hy is this so important \ell, simply because your Goernment
thinks your Name is the same as \ou. ,\ell, it probably doesn't really, but
it always acts as though it does, so you neer igure out the dierence.
And it certainly doesn't inorm you o the dierence. Did they tell you
this at school,.
Lery letter you receie is addressed to \OUR NAML. Get it
Addressed to your Name. Not to \our luman Sel. Because luman
Seles are born 'nameless'. \e are not born with a Name tattooed on our
oreheads, are we
1his is why your name is actually a Legal liction Name. I anyone
writes to you, or calls you, using that Name, then you are perectly entitled
to ignore it, or respond: 'cv.e ve, are ,ov tat/ivg to ve. f ,ov are, tbev v
covvovt, cattea aabaeaab. In my case it's: 'cv.e ve, are ,ov tat/ivg to ve. f
,ov are, tbev v covvovt, cattea 1erovica. And when they continue: Ye.,
M.. Cbavav, ., I interrupt by saying: ;v.t tota ,ov v covvovt, cattea
1erovica. M.. Cbavav i. a egat ictiov. av vvav ava reat. av vot
fictiovat, tegat or otberri.e, a. ,ov vv.t .vret, be abte to .ee..
\ithin their jurisdiction, they can only address your Legal liction
Name. So. 1hey. Do. Not. Like. It. Up 'em!
Maybe you 'get it' now
\hat's in a Name Lerything, baby! LVLR\1lING!
lorced to carry an ID Card, \ou & \our Name are being glued
together. lorced to hae a microchip implanted, \ou and \our Name are
one and the same thing.
'#
Orders
Chapter 21: Orders
you go into a shop that sells curtains, and place an order or some
curtains, do you expect to pay 1he answer is: Ye.. I you place an
order with a Mail Order irm, do you expect to pay commensurate
with receiing the goods 1he answer is: Ye..
I
An Order is chargeable! 1he amount to charge is dependent on the one
who carries out the order. 1he Mail Order irm, and the shop, set their
rates. \ou decide whether or not you are prepared to pay that amount
beore you place any order.
I someone gies you an order ,e.g. a PCSO, Policyman, or a
Magistrate,, you can say: . tbat av oraer.. I the answer is: ô, then
you can say: v tbat ca.e re.ectfvtt, aective to roriae tbat .errice.
I the answer is: Ye., you can say: v tbat ca.e, .ivce av oraer i.
cbargeabte, ritt cbarge ,ov _:0,000 for carr,ivg it ovt. .re ,ov rearea to a,..
I leae you, dear Reader, to guess what the answer will be. I they are
silly enough to agree, in ront o witnesses, then you hae a Lawul
Contract with them ,a Lien,. So, it is possible to remind them: a.ea ov
tbe fact tbat ,ov are agreeivg to a tarfvtt, evforceabte Covtract, rovta ,ov ti/e tbe
cbavce to recov.iaer..
,I think you`ll ind they generally tend to re-consider,.
'$
Chapter 22: Laws, Regulations, Guidelines &
Sovereignty
'm the Legal liction, baby ... now here's the twist ... I ... don't ... exist!
,with apologies to the Bonzo Dogs, eaturing the late Vi Stanshall,.
Beore going anywhere in this morass, we need a ew basics. I
1here are two undamental kinds o Law`: Natural and Man-made.
Let`s characterise them. I think you might agree there are three main
characteristics in each case.
Natural Laws or the Laws of Nature, Science, etc.
1, Mankind does not make them. Mankind obseres them &
their eects, then enumerates and ealuates them, in most cases
being able to deise mathematical ormulae to express them, utilise
them and inter-utilise i.e. apply them. Lxamples: 1he Law o
Graity ,Newton`s Laws,, Boyle`s Law, Maxwell`s Laws, Charles`
Law, Ohm`s Law, etc.
2, 1hey apply uniersally and unilaterally without ear or aour.
3, 1here is no penalty or breaking them because they cannot be
broken.
Man-made Laws, Acts, Statutes, etc.
1, Mankind does make them. Mankind changes them in
accordance with its own desires, wishes, needs, etc. Mankind can
wipe them away ,repeal them, at the stroke o a pen.
2, 1hey are applied by Courts o Law. 1hey are not applied
equally because they always depend on 'judgment'. It is oten said:
1bere i. ove tar for tbe ricb ava ove tar for tbe oor.
3, 1here is always a penalty or breaking them because they can
be broken i one is prepared to accept the consequences.
Stated that way I submit it is possible to see that the two kinds are
exact opposites. Lach characteristic is the exact inverse o the other.
And yet we use the same word - 'Law' - to describe them both!
So what happens 1he latter become psychologically imbued with the
characteristics o the ormer!
So: `re got to a, it .becav.e it`. tbe ar takes on the same
characteristics as: f ;vv off tbi. ctiff ritt fatt aorvrara..
'%
Laws, Regulations, Guidelines & Sovereignty
Actually, in summary, the most important dierence between the two
is a simple word: 'consent'.
I you jump o the cli you will all downwards. 1he alling does not
require your consent. It will happen. \our consent is whether or not you
actually jump - or whether or not you are standing on the edge o the cli
at all.
In the second case ,`re got to a, ., your consent is ery much
required. \ou hae to consent to reach or your chequebook and ill in a
cheque - and post it, etc.
loweer, the essential point being made here is that een i you do not
consent to write that cheque, your consent is still needed in all stages o:
!bat va, baev if tbe bitt i. vot aia.
\our 'consent' is built-in as an essential to the system o Man-made
Laws, Statues, etc. \our consent is irreleant to the Laws o Nature.
1he Law o Graity is set in tablets o stone, and operates whether
someone has written it down or not. \ou will hae been led to beliee,
throughout your entire lie, that Statutes are equally set in tablets o stone.
1hey are not. 1hey are nothing more than Company Policy written down
using ink on paper.
1he trick, the Grand Deception, is to create the Legal liction Person
or you, and to address eerything statutory or oicious` to that iction,
using a Legal liction Name . which is suiciently similar to what you
would naturally respond ,i.e. to !bat ,ov are covvovt, cattea,. 1hereater
you hae become tricked into accepting a role in this: .tt tbe rorta`. a
.tage, ava re are ;v.t ta,er. of bit art..
1o do this they get you to pretend to be what you are not. But they call
this 'thing' something you will naturally assume that you are. And they
know that you will naturally make this assumption. And they utterly rely
on it. Only a system that is utterly eil and thoroughly corrupt - without
any possibility o redemption - could hae dreamed up this dooley, which
is ully described in the Chapters deoted to egate.e and to the egat
ictiov Per.ov.
lrom the point o iew o you, yoursel, the luman Being with the
liing soul, Man-made Laws or Statutes can be treated as guidance and
nothing more. 1hey are not Laws. 1hey are Regulations. As ar as you are
concerned they can be considered to be Guidelines . but that`s only i
you choose to consider them that way. It is perectly possible to reject any
or all o them, as not haing your consent.
And this leads to the idea o soereignty`.
'&
\e oten hear that: .tt are createa eqvat - and, o course, we are. Any
baby arries ,basically, the same way, and has the exact same needs. It
doesn`t matter whether you are born in the Queen`s lospital or in a
1raeller`s Van.
But, what does: .tt are createa eqvat translate to In practice low can
eeryone be created equal
1he only way is by some standardised mechanism. 1his is usually stated
as: v tbe ivage of tbe Creator, which implies that each created indiidual is
a clone rom the same model. Len i you don`t beliee in a Creator ,as I
don`t - I beliee in a Uniersal Lie lorce, Uniersal Consciousness - you
can call it God i you like,, it still amounts to the same thing - just using
dierent rhetoric.
O course: .tt are createa eqvat, thus no-one should be treated
dierently rom anyone else.
But I am not you, and you are not me. ,1hat`s arguable, actually, i we
are all deried rom One Consciousness,
So that`s a big dierence. But there is a big similarity: \e are
indiidually responsible or our indiidual actions. And that`s one o the
basic tenets o lie.
And the only way that I can be responsible or my own actions, and -
at the same time - you be responsible or your own actions is i we are
both sovereign individuals, and equal in all cases ,v tbe .ave ivage,.
I`m sorry i I lost you. 1hink o it this way. \ou say your Country is
soereign`. \hat does that mean It means it is equal to all other
countries. It means it has the right to goern itsel, without external
intererence. \our country considers itsel to be equal to all other
countries.
1he same applies to you. \hy not A country` is only a collection o
indiiduals who, together, make up the population.
\ou must be as soereign as your Country. And so must eeryone else
in your Country. Otherwise how can your Country be soereign \here
does your Country`s soereignty come rom, then
lAC1: \ou are a soereign luman Being by birth, because your spirit
is sovereign. \ou are responsible or your own actions - certainly ater
the 'age o majority'.
\ou hae two choices: \ou can take your soereignty, and wield it. Or
you can, by consent, gie it away. So now we are back to 'consent'. And
we are also back to 'person' because - by consenting to wear the Legal
''
Laws, Regulations, Guidelines & Sovereignty
liction Person oercoat, you tacitly accept the jurisdiction o any Statute
Law,Regulation,Guideline you may be accused o iolating.
'(
Chapter 23: The Hive Mind
e must get out o the habit o alling into the 'lie Mind 1rap'
constantly and consistently. Almost, it seems, with eery breath
we take. Perhaps one o the best ways o expressing the lie
Mind is by example. \hen asked: !b, ao ,ov ao tbat., a lied Mind
response is: t. rbat re ao vor. 1bat. tbe ra, re ao it. Lnd o story. Lnd
o conersation. Lnd o discussion. Lnd o argument.
\
No . it's not the end o the discussion! Nothing like! 1he original
question is not answered by that response. loweer, it is generally the
only answer you'll get rom some Organic Robot who has a lie Mind.
In other words that's a lie Mind answer.
But there are also lie Mind questions. lor example: "low do we do
this oicially", is that kind o question. 1he question should hae been:
What's the best way to do this honourably?.
I mean, what has 'oicially' got to do with anything
1he lie Mind is ingrained into our psyche due to the indoctrination
we suer during childhood. It comes rom our parents and schooling. It
comes rom these sources because they were similarly indoctrinated - as
opposed to being properly educated - during their own childhoods.
!bat rovta tbe veigbbovr. tbiv/. was a perennial aourite o my own
mother. It I used to tell her: aovt gire a .bit rbat tbe, tbiv/. 1bat. tbeir
robtev, vot vive.
,I can only presume I was born a rebel,.
I hated school . due to its lie Mind attitude. Although I couldn't
put my inger on it at the time. I just knew it was all wrong 'somehow'.
A Builder can make a house. A house cannot make a Builder. 1he
Builder is 'aboe' the house.
A luman Being can make a Law. 1he Law cannot make a luman
Being. 1he luman Being is 'aboe' the Law. It has to be that way. And
the Law has already been made. Centuries ago. Although there were
attempts beorehand, a major boost, to codiy it properly, occurred in
1215.
\hen we are in lie Mind mode we are not 'aboe' anything. Our
mentality is 'below' the situation. \e are looking upwards, and wondering:
or to ao tbi. officiatt,.. \e are looking or 'guidance rom aboe'.
(*
1he Hive Mind
1he correct attitude is to use our Common Sense, and to take an
honourable course o action. 1hen our mentality is right where is should
be: Aboe the situation at hand.
I'm oten told that many people want 'to be led'. 1his argument can - to
some extent - be countered by wondering whether or not their childhood
indoctrination has let them in that state And whether or not, i they had
been educated instead o indoctrinated during that period o their lies,
perhaps they would not want to let the Goernment ,and it propaganda
arm, called '1he Media', do all their thinking or them
But I'm obiously out on a limb with that answer. Simply because I'm
unable to proe it, o course. My Common Sense tells me . but that's all.
But my Common Sense also tells me that - een i the ast majority
would not want to be led by the nose had they been properly educated -
then there is still the possibility that some would want it that way.
OK. line. Let them be sheep, and led by the nose - by some nannying
Big Brother-style Goernment.
But don't include me in that, sunshine! Because I don't accept being
treated as a 'lowest common denominator'. And, I beliee, there are
millions o us who object to being treated like that.
And we hae a oice.
And that's what this book is all about.
()
Chapter 24: Mass Mind Control & Enslavement
reious Chapters hae explained the triumirate o the Grand
Deception, namely Move,, egate.e and Retigiov. And it is all
undamentally bound up with the illusion o 'money'. P
lae you eer asked yoursel: !bere aoe. vove, cove frov, iv tbe fir.t
tace..
\ou hae \ell, congratulations! \hat was your answer
I'll tell you what mine was. I decided that eerything must hae an
ultimate source. My Common Sense told me that. I knew you could
obtain money by working or some Company, as a salary or wages, and I
knew you could also obtain money by selling things. I didn't think I was
ery ar out on a limb with these thoughts.
But then I thought: !ett, ,e. to att tbat . bvt rbere aia it cove frov
origivatt,..
Now most people would say: 1be av/ of vgtava. 1be Ro,at Mivt. 1be,
va/e it, aovt tbe,. Daft qve.tiov, 1!.
So I thought: !ett, i. it .vcb a aaft qve.tiov. veav bor ao tbe, vt it ivto
circvtatiov. Do tbe, bire a tave, ava aro it frov tbe ./,. !ett, re verer beara of
tbat. Doe. .oveove .tava ritb a bvc/etfvt of it, iv 1breaaveeate treet, ava tbror it
v iv tbe air, for av,ove to catcb. !ett, vo, re verer beara of tbat eitber.
I decided that there must by a 'system'. A mechanism. A controlling
mechanism.
Am I bonkers ,Don't you dare answer that!,
\ell, I decided that I wasn't quite ready or the Looney-Bin just yet.
,Len though, by the way, I was actually born in one. In Sedgeield, In
County Durham, during \\II. No, my mother wasn't mad. She had
been eacuated to there. lrom out o London,
So I continued thinking. And I looked around. And I saw Banks. And I
saw them going cap-in-hand or bailouts. And I saw some Banks and
Building Societies going tits-up. And I thought: f tbe, go bett, v, tbev tbe,
cavt be tbe .ovrce, becav.e if tbat rere tbe ca.e tbat rovtavt baev.
So I decided I didn't hae the answer to my puzzle.
And I was let with a ew serious ,in my iew, questions, which were:
1. low is "money" created
(!
Mass Mind Control & Lnslavement
2. \ho, or what, authorises it
3. low is "an amount o it" created
4. low does it get into circulation
I thought, or a moment, that I'd bitten o more than I could chew.
But then I remembered what is supposed to be a Goernment Agency
,but actually isn't!, called 'ler Majesty's 1reasury'.
So I did a lreedom o Inormation Request to lM 1reasury, asking
them i they could kindly help me answer these questions.
And, to cut a long story short, they ery kindly replied. And I hae
obtained our responses rom them, which I include in an Appendix. 1he
responses I obtained hae been ery helpul ,in many ways,, but not one
has actually answered any o my our questions.
\ell, you might suggest: 1bat. robabt, becav.e tbe, aovt /vor,
1erovica!.
And, I suppose, that is possible. But, i lM 1reasury don't know, then
who does Does 'money' just appear by magic, then ,1hey say it doesn't
grow on trees, but obiously that's where all the banknotes actually start
their lies,.
But here's another important acet. In one o the letters I sent to lM
1reasury, I explained exactly what I understood the answers to my
questions were. ,Neer ask a question unless you know the answer,
otherwise you neer know whether or not the answer you are gien is
bullshit,. And I asked them to please conirm or deny my understanding.
And, do you know what 1hey did not conirm - BU1 DID NO1 DLN\
- my understanding!
And denial would hae been so easy. All they had to do was to say:
ô, .orr,, bvt ,ov are rrovg. But they didn't!
\ou can check out the entire correspondence in the appropriate
Appendix. \ou will see that lM 1reasury did impart some ery useul
nuggets. Such as the act that 'money' has not been backed by any
precious metal since 1931. ,In other words my lietime, and probably
yours,.
And that currency is iat, i.e. 'it has no intrinsic alue'. And that the best
you can eer do is to swap a tenner or two iers, and so on. And that
the issuance o 'money' ,rom whereer the ultimate source lies, is limited
by Goernment Statute called 1he Currency Act.
\es 'limited' . but on who, which Authority, is this limitation placed
1hat's the question!
("
\hat were the answers I gae to lM 1reasury, that they did not deny
I asked the questions in this way:
1. \hat, precise, mechanism causes the release o 'some
amount' It must require some authority. \hose authority
2. \hat deines 'the amount'
3. low does this created money 'get into circulation'
I self-answered those questions, back to HM 1reasury, in this
way:
Now we know the answer to ,3, aboe is not that it is dropped
rom an airplane. Nor is it just because a Bank may up and demand
it ,otherwise Banks and Building Societies would not go out o
business ... and what gies them a priority right to make such a
demand, anyway,. ,Although, o course, the recent bailouts were,
precisely, 'because the Banks demanded it'. But this is ery unusual,
as I'm sure you will agree. lence all the uror!,
I you want me to suggest answers or your consideration,
answers that get to the heart o the matter, and may thereore
explain to you what I consider to be the heart o the matter, then
my considered understandings would be:
1. 1he precise mechanism or the creation o money is based on
a Promissory Note, an IOU, signed by AN\ indiidual when
applying or a loan, mortgage, or equialent. A 'promise to pay
back'. ,But, as you hae already said, 'money is iat, it has no
alue' ... so the 'pay back' is an empty promise ... just like the empty
promise on a banknote itsel,
2. 1he amount is the amount o the loan.
3. It is moed into circulation by making the amount aailable to
whoeer made the promise as a credit to an account on which s,he
can draw upon.
Obiously, as you hae explained, there are Statutory Limits
placed on this mechanism, such that it doesn't run o into ininity.
lor example by raising Interest Rates such that the Promissory
Notes generated by Loan Applications ,1, become ewer.
lM 1reasury did not deny these answers. 1hey ignored them.
So what the hell does this mean
It means that you apply or a loan o some kind. 1his could be a
straight monetary loan, or a Credit Card, or a mortgage. Anything similar.
(#
\ou make an application, by illing out an Application lorm. \ou
think it is an Application lorm, asking the Loan Shark ,commonly called
a Bank, Bankster, Credit Company, Loan Company, Building Society .
you get the picture, to lend you some o their own money.
\ou think this because eeryone else thinks the same thing. Len most
o the Organic Robots who work or the Loan Sharks, processing
applications, think that's what's happening.
But, it isn't.
\hen you sign the Loan Application, you are - in point o act -
actually signing a cheque (a Bill of Lxchange). A cheque drawn on an
Account you did not realise you had. It is an Account that is automatically
created, in the name o your Legal liction Person, when your birth was
registered by your parents.
It is, undamentally, a 'notional' Account. Really just numbers on a
ledger ,a computer database, these days,.
1he Account Number is somehow tied to your National Insurance
Number and your Birth Certiicate Number, and is named by taking your
name in all capitals. 1hus mine is VLRONICA ClAPMAN, or example.
\ou send this cheque to the Loan Sharks, and they rub their hands in
glee! Because you hae made some 'money' or them! 1hey then send this
cheque to lM 1reasury, or some Goernment Department 'known only
to them'.
,It is this knowledge, that is obiously sort-o secret that enables a
Loan Shark to start up in business. My lreedom o Inormation Request
was designed to extract that secret, but I was just stone-walled, because
I'm not a Loan Shark. But notice . my answers were not denied!,
1he 'source o all money creation' ,I still think it is lM 1reasury,
because o other inormation I hae researched about the US 1reasury.
lor example, insoar as it can issue 'warrants or monies'. And does
anyone think lM 1reasury operates signiicantly dierently rom US
1reasury, will take the cheque and 'cash' it. 'Cashing it' comprises
'Authorising credit to the Bearer o the cheque'.
,"I PROMISL 1O PA\ 1lL BLARLR ON DLMAND .",
remember,
So the Loan Shark is credited with the amount you signed or. I you
applied or _50,000 then he is 'up' by _50,000!
Loely jubbly! Clap hands . walk away with your money ,i he wanted
to!,. le could send you back a letter saying: Ob, .orr,. Yovr oav
.ticatiov faitea, after att!.
($
And you would be none the wiser.
But he knows, i he always did that, people would stop applying or
loans. Because there would be no point.
And he also knows i he moes that _50,000 into a Personal Account
you can drawn on, then you will draw on it. And spend it. And you will
think you hae to pay it back ,because eeryone thinks that!,, and you will
also assume that you hae to pay an additional amount called
'Interest' ,because eeryone thinks that!,
And he knows that, in this latter situation, bearing in mind the way
Compound Interest works, he is likely to end up with being paid 1\ICL
,at the ery least,!
Being paid twice for money you made!
Loely, loely, jubbly!
He steals something from you in the first place, and gets you to
pay it back with Interest.
Oh boy! \hat are the words I'm looking or I hae a big problem
inding the words, because raud, thet, grand larceny just do not do the
situation justice, in my humble opinion.
But that's not een where it ends. Oh yes ... there's lots more to come.
lirst o all, within that mechanism, een i it were not utterly
raudulent, there is only the mechanism or 'creating' the _50,000.
1here is no mechanism at all for creating the Interest!
1here is no mechanism or creating Interest. \hich means that, under
the current raud, all loans could never, ever, be paid off! It is
impossible! And that situation creates the dog-eat-dog so-called
'ciilisation', which we all know only too well. Because we hae to lie in
it, 24,.
Only utter psychopaths, such as I described in the Chapter on the
Ctobat tite, could hae designed this, surely \ou would need to be
inhuman, surely
But there is more.
1hink about it.
\ou hae a Goernment Agency 'creating money'. ,It doesn't matter
which one it is . it ain't you, that's or sure!,. \ou hae another
Goernment Agency 'wanting money'. In the UK these two Agencies are
lM 1reasury and lM Reenue & Customs. In the united States this
would be the US 1reasury and the IRS.
(%
Now, why can't lM Reenue & Customs, i they 'want money', get it
directly rom lM 1reasury, who can 'make money' 'Make as much
money' as lM Reenue & Customs would eer need
\hy bother you & I
I can only think o one possible, plausible, reason: Move, ba. to a..
tbrovgb v. iv oraer to /ee ovr vo.e. to tbe griva.tove. v .bort, to /ee v. ev.tarea. t
at.o ba. to a.. tbrovgb tbe oav bar/. becav.e tbe Ctobat tite orv tbev, ava
tbat`. bor tbe, obtaiv tbeir va..ire reattb. .va tbe, orv tbe Corervvevt., tbv. tbe,
cav ev.vre tbe tegi.tatiov tbat evabte. tbe.e rioff.. Ceveratt, ritbovt tbe /vorteage of
]oe togg..
1o keep us in the prison-without-bars.
Now, perhaps, you can understand why this Chapter was called Ma..
Miva Covtrot ava v.tarevevt
I hope so. I'e done my best to explain.
\hy am I so coninced my answers are correct, and that this system
operates the way I hae explained Because there is no other way.
1here is no other way to apply domination and mass mind-control oer
the entire planet. No other way such that een a dullard could not see
through.
Lery scrap o practical eidence we hae supports this contention.
Lery prearication we encounter uniersally supports this contention.
Lery media article is uniersally designed to hide this contention. Lery
book o Law, Accountancy, or Lconomics likewise. Lery cognitie
dissonance, rom eery Organic Robot, supports this contention. And our
own Common Sense literally screams this contention.
\ell, it does to me, at any rate.
1hink about it. I hae explained how Move, & egate.e ,supported by
Retigiov., are massie illusions. Merely Belie Systems that could be
jettisoned at the snap o inger and thumb. But, i that were the case, then
domination and enslaement would no longer be possible.
On the other hand, the set-up o these Belie Systems was based on
pandering to innate greed. It is ery easy to see how the concept o
'money' could hae been slipped into the uniersal psyche, based on: Yov
ror/ea bara for tbat, ,ov .bovta bare .ove retvrv, and: 1bi. .,.tev i. .o vvcb
ea.ier, vore covrevievt, ava vore fteibte tbav barterivg. .tt re bare to ao i. to .et
.ove .tavaara..
Constantly supported, at eery turn, by psychologies whose design
basis was 'greed' ,Roman Lmpire - greed or domination leudal System -
greed o the Nobility and the Monarchs,
(&
Neer once did anyone ,o importance, ,apparently, say: bare to ta/e,
becav.e v atire. vt att veea i. att veea. aovt veea av, vore, tbav/.. t i.
ai.bovovrabte to ta/e vore tbav veea. aovt veea to be greea,. firvt, betiere re
.bovta att tbiv/ tbat ra,. 1be ovt, rerara ritt erer veea i. .ivt, tbe bovovr of
covtribvtivg .etfte..t, to tbe gooa of ove ava att. .va tbiv/ tbat .bovta be tbe ovt,
rerara av,ove erer veea.. Dovt veea vove,. Dovt veea tegat. Dovt veea retigiov.
Dovt veea ittv.iov.!.
Back in the relatiely unciilised days, when it all started, it is easy to
see how people could be ooled. 1here was a time when they belieed
wholeheartedly in a God who made the Sun, and made it reole around
the ,llat, Larth. And they neer questioned these things. So why should
they question 'the introduction o a Monetary System or their
conenience'
\ou would, and still do, need to take a step back and realise there is no
dishonour in taking, and think about the larmer, Miller, and Baker
example, beore it is possible to see the hoodwinking. \ou also hae to
understand the psychology o sicko psychopaths, who would actually
want to create these illusions. \ou hae to do this beore the audacity o it
eer has the slightest chance o dawning upon you.
And, een then, you would still need to answer why you een asked the
question: !bat va/e. ,ov .o .vre, 1erovica, tbat ,ovr av.rer. are rigbt.. 1he
act that this latter question een crosses your mind shows how ingrained
the whole system o illusions has become.
\ou hae to remember that we were made by sicko psychos, in the irst
place. 1he Annunaki ,the Biblical Neilim,. And their own hal, o their
creation, implanted the sickness o greed within us, so they knew exactly
how to pander to it. \e took our example rom them. \e knew no
better. \e copied their appalling example. \e saw the way they behaed,
and copied it, on the assumption that was the way to behae. \e were
told they were Gods - what chance did we actually hae to know any
better
\e can know better because o one thing. \e are also hal human.
And, whereer 'human' came rom, it came with compassion, conscience,
empathy. It came with Common Sense. \e hae that, and they don't. \e
hae a 'better nature', and they don't. 1hat allows us to unrael their
careully constructed illusions, which I hope I hae done in some small
part.
Neertheless the reality they hae constructed, in order to maintain
their domination, is immense and ery, ery, thorough.
('
But there is a way out. 1he avte. in this book show that. It
comprises what is called Lawul Rebellion. It's a sort o 'lawul Judo',
where you take the momentum o the attacker and use it against them, in
your own deence, by adding dollops o Common Sense.
It is pointless telling me you hae democracy` aailable to sort anything
out, because your democracy` doesn`t work. It doesn`t work because
those who attain the highest positions` all work or the same Masters ,the
Global Llite,. It doesn`t matter to the Global Llite whether the current
Prime Minister is 1ony B Liar, Gordon Brown, Daid Cameron ,or
whoeer - at the time o writing,, anymore than it makes any dierence
whether the US President is a DIMocrat or a RepuliCON.
1he only thing anyone has at their disposal is not a useless democratic
ote`, but Lawul Rebellion - used to its most potent eect. 1he vast
majority of which can be done from your armchair, sitting in front
of your computer, and writing letters in your own defence. 1he
more people that do this, and to stand up for themselves & their
loved ones, the better.
I'm sure you'll get the idea rom these avte.. I not then you can
join in the lorums that hae been setup up at forum.fmotl.com.
1he only reason why they` get away with any o this, is simple: People
just do not know their Rights.
Rights that many o our oreathers gae their lies to protect.
It seems to me ,at least, we need to do three things:
J. Learn or re-discover them,
2. Use them at all times,
3. 1each them to our children, so they never get lost or forgotten
ever again.
Like them, you are a magniicent part o all that is, all that eer was,
and all that eer will be. And it`s long past time you claimed your reedom
to be what you truly are. It`s a lot more than just a seen-letter word.
((
Epilogue
othing I hae written herein incites or induces iolence o any
kind. Nor any orm o racial hatred. In point o act, quite the
contrary. All I'e done is used Common Sense to point out the
obious, and documented methods by which perectly peaceul, and
perectly lawul, rebellion can be achieed - entirely within the Law-o-
the-Land.
N
And nowhere hae I een suggested that anyone should break the Law-
o-the-Land . or een Statutes or that matter. Once again, quite to the
contrary.
And the Magna Carta 1215 says quite clearly, in Article 61, that it is the
Inalienable Natural Right and Duty o each and eery one o us to rebel
with lawul excuse, as eer it may become necessary.
1he content o this book indicates that such necessity is upon us, in my
humble opinion.
I am ully prepared to go toe-to-toe with any Judge, Magistrate, Lawyer,
Solicitor, Policyman, General, Admiral, Politician, King, Queen - indeed
anyone - and stand on the Common Sense I hae documented.
1his is not blu.
I am not bluing.
And I am not araid o you.
\es . you know who I mean. But, o course, you would neer do that,
would you
Go toe-to-toe openly
\ou would use your undoubted 'muscle', supplied by your
meticulously-created Mind-Controlled Organic Robots, to lock me away
without discussion. Or you would make sure I somehow disappeared.
'Character assassination','actual assassination' . you don't care . as
long as the 1ruth remains coered up. 'Suicide' is your aourite one, o
course. 1hat and 'Strange accidents, when the CC1V just didn't happen to
be working'.
\ou are snielling, psychopathic cowards - and that's the way you act.
1hat's the way you hae to act. 1hat's the way you'e always acted, since
the beginning o time. Because your actions could neer withstand any
scrutiny in the light o day. 1he 'hand' has to be kept 'hidden', doesn't it
)**
Lpilogue
\ou disgust me, to the root o my soul. But do I hate you No, not at
all. I just want you locked up, away rom decent people, to hae a ery
long lie - and the opportunity to consider all the eil and corruption you
hae perpetrated upon decent souls. I want to gie you as long as possible
to think about all that. In a real prison. \ith real bars. So there`s no
mistaking the situation: t`. vot corrvtiov tbat`. tbe robtev. t`. tbe
acceptance of corrvtiov tbat`. tbe robtev said Pat Rattigan in 2004.
And anyone who reads this book will know what you are. I anything
happens to me, as it has done to others who hae reealed 1ruths, then
what I hae said becomes 1ruth anyway.
But then let to stand as it is, the blinding obiousness o what Iè
written is, rankly, rather hard to rebut, is it not
Bit o a problem, then.
And you do, ater all, hae an awul lot to lose.
But, or me: reeaov. ;v.t avotber rora for votbivg teft to to.e, as Kris
Kristoerson once wrote.
Sue me. Proe you are not a psychopath. Let`s hae your DNA
examined by a Court . een a de acto one.
You have no clothes! You Lmperors have no clothes! 1he bits of
blue cloth you wear, with metallic trinkets attached, the wigs you
don, the trappings & robes you wear . still leave you as naked as
the day that you were born!
,I I eer say anything dierent, 'it will be the drugs talking'. 1he ones
your Robots will hae used, without my permission or my consent,.
)*)
Appendix A: Templates & Usage Disclaimer
isclaimer: You are playing with fire. And you know what
happens if you do that, without knowing exactly what you
are doing. It is, therefore, absolutely essential that you
have read this book from end to end before attempting to rebut any
legal action taken against you. And, furthermore, you do it in
accordance with the information herein entirely at your own risk.
1he techniques explained herein will not, necessarily work in any
case if you have already been through Court Proceedings because,
at that point, you will have tacitly agreed to be the Legal Iiction
Person.
D
All the information contained in this book is used entirely at your
own discretion. In no way should anything be read herein other
than to encourage you to consider possibilities. And to use your
Common Sense to understand the deceptive world in which you
live. 1here is no encouragement or incitement to take any actions of
any kind.
1he 1emplates can be ound on the Internet, on the links gien below.
1his is the best way to present them, because o their 'dynamic' nature.
1hey can be used or more than one circumstance, or example i more
than one Legal liction Person is inoled i.e. 'Mr. & Mrs.'. lurthermore
certain preixing can be inoked - depending on circumstances
1he responses to them will either be 'standard' - generally to repeat
Statutes in return ,undamentally they hae no idea what you are talking
about, and respond by rote,.
\here necessary the 1emplates include the condition o 'estoppel by
acquiescence', and so this should be pointed out in the reply,
speciically:
,a, No response to the luman Sel has been orthcoming ,response
was still addressed to Legal liction Person,, and this is the last time you
will reply pointing this out,
,b, No response in substance has been orthcoming,
,c, 1hus 'permanent and irrevocable lawful estoppel by
acquiescence' has been gained, due to their dishonour,
,d, \our original Conditional Agreement remoed all Controersy, and
thus remoed the possibility o Court Action on their part,
)*!
1emplates & Usage Disclaimer
,e, Notice that henceorth a charge o _500 will be leied or letters
sent that appertain to the matter in hand ,where a communication is
addressed to your luman Sel,. Correspondence continued to be
addressed to your Legal liction Person will be returned unopened,
marked: No Legal Iictions dwell here. Only Human Beings. 1ry
La-La Land,
1hese things tend to tie them up on knots. I they still persist, let them.
\ouè already won, so why should you care what they do \ou can write
back and tell them that youè already won so, whateer they do - theyè
already lost. Point out that, i they go to Court, their case will be
dismissed, and that you will make a Counterclaim or harassment in the
sum o _50,000 or all the UNLA\lUL stress you hae suered. ,Make
sure you always do this rom what you are commonly called, and not the
Legal liction Name they addressed, \ithout Prejudice`, etc. 1he
1emplates make sure o all this,. 1he best thing is not to open letters
addressed to your Legal liction Person, but to return them unopened, as
explained aboe. Phone calls: Don`t admit to your name, and DO NO1
quote the irst line o your address`. Give them absolutely nothing
(not even the time of day, if possible).
lae I actually done this mysel \es. On a number o occasions.
\hat happened to me Nothing ... as yet. Lxcept the chance to write this
book.
It is elt that the 1emplates should be sel-explanatory.
I hae been asked: !bicb tevtate ao v.e:.. 1he answer to that is: 1be
tevtate. are tbe 2va Pba.e. 1be 1.t Pba.e i. to .to a,ivg. Yov ritt tbev receire a
tetter, rbicb ,ov ritt veea to rebvt. Yov ritt tbev /vor rbicb Rebvttat 1evtate to
v.e.
1he only 1emplates presented herein are those that hae been proen
to work. loweer, while they start the 'rebuttal ball rolling', they do not -
necessarily - stop the process immediately. It is oten necessary to ollow
up, explaining the dierence between 'legal' and 'lawul' ,their response
will always be in the 'legal sense',, and pointing out that the lack o
response in substance` has gained the estoppel, explained aboe.
1ype templates.fmotl.com into your Browser to obtain personalised
rebuttal letters or the ollowing situations:
)*"
Debt Collection Agency Rebuttal.
1his 1emplate is aailable in dynamic orm ia templates.fmotl.com.
Below is a generalised sample, where N are numbers to be replaced by
the ollowing:
1 ~ \our Address Line 1
~ \our PostCode
8 ~ \our Letter Date
9 ~ DCA Reerence Number
10 ~ DCA Reerence Date
11 ~ DCA Address Line 1
1 ~ \our Gien Name
18 ~ \our lamily Name
DO NO1 SIGN I1. 1here is no need. 1hey' often do not sign
anything written to you, so why give them a Signature to forge?
Send it registered'.
)*#
In care o:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Near: ||
8
Re: ?9?, dated ?J0?.
Notice of Request 1o Cease Harrassment.
1o:
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dear Sirs,
Please read the ollowing notice thoroughly and careully beore
responding. It is a notice. It inorms you. It means what it says.
I reer to your letter dated 10.
As you are a third party interener in this matter acting without
authority, I DO NO1 gie you permission to interere in my commercial
aairs as you hae no legal standing. I do not hae a contract with you
and any permission that you beliee you may hae rom me is hereby
withdrawn. I you beliee that you hae power o attorney to act on my
behal you are hereby ired, and any consent that you beliee you may
hae, tacit or otherwise, is hereby withdrawn.
I am amiliar with the terms o Section 40 o the Administration o
Justice Act 190, and the Protection rom larassment Act 199. And I
beliee, should you continue in contacting me ater my request or you to
cease your actiity, that you will be guilty o harassment and blackmail,
and you will be in breach o these acts, and you will be reported to the
releant bodies.
I am well aware o Section 40, sub-section ,3, which you may consider
entitles you to proceed. loweer upon ull commercial liability and
penalty o perjury you will need to supply the ollowing Proos o Claims:
)*$
1. Proo o Claim that your actions are reasonable.
2. Proo o Claim that any obligation on my part is due, or belieed by
you to be due to you, and not to some other party.
3a. Proo o Claim that any obligation on my part is to yoursel by
proiding sight o the appropriate contract, or
3b. Proo o Claim that any obligation on my part to persons or whom
you act by proiding sight o the appropriate contract.
4. Proo o Claim that any obligation on my part protects you rom any
uture loss.
5. Proo o Claim that any obligation on my part is enorcement o a
legal process on a luman Being under Common Law jurisdiction, who
cannot possibly hae such liability under said jurisdiction.
\ou would o course need to proide these Proos, including showing
the ull and audited accounting, i you chose to go to law.
Please also note that i you contact me by telephone, ater a ormal
request not to, you will also be in breach o the \ireless 1elegraphy Act
,1949, and, as such, I will report you to both 1rading Standards and 1he
Oice o lair 1rading. And take urther note that continued telephone
calls ater the receipt o a request not to call may constitute a criminal
oence under Section 12 o the Communications Act 2003.
linally, you do not, nor hae you eer had, my permission to use or
process my personal data in any way, and so pursuant to the Data
Protection Act 1998, I hereby demand that you cease use o any and all
data with regard to me, and that you immediately destroy all o my data
held on your records. lailure to do so will result in a report being
submitted to 1he Inormation Commissioner or Data Protection
breaches.
\ou will be deemed to hae been sered notice o my request and I will
deem it sered three ,3, days rom the date o this letter. 1his has been
sent by recorded deliery. I am adising you that any communications
rom you including but not limited to letters, phone calls and text
messages receied ater this date will be recorded,noted with the
intention o them being used as eidence.
Do not contact me again.
Sincerely and without ill will, exation or riolity,
1: o the 18 amily
)*%
\I1lOU1 PRLJUDICL, i.e. all Natural Inalienable Rights Resered
Ptea.e aaare.. att fvtvre corre.ovaevce iv tbe vatter to a airect vvav etf, vavet, .
1.: of tbe .1. favit,, a. covvovt, cattea.
Lncl: Original paperwork as receied.
)*&
Charge or Demand Rebuttal (incl. Iixed Penalty Notices).
the ollowing:
~ \our PostCode
9 ~ Charge,Demand Reerence Number
10 ~ Charge,Demand Reerence Date
11 ~ Charge,Demand Address Line 1
1 ~ \our Gien Name
19 ~ 1he Legal liction Name, exactly as printed in the Demand.
20 ~ 1he Amount Demanded
1his has been organised or a lixed Penalty Charge. 1his same ,or
similar, wording could be used or any Demand in general.
)*'
In care o:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Near: ||
8
Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Iixed Penalty Charge and
Request for Clarification.
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dear Sirs,
Please read the ollowing notice thoroughly and careully beore
responding. It is a notice. It inorms you. It means what it says.
1he reason why you need to read careully is simple. I am oering
conditional agreement. 1his remoes controersy, and means that you no
longer hae any ultimate recourse to a court o law in this matter, because
there is no controersy upon which it could adjudicate. \ou always hae
the option o dragging these conditions into a court o law only to be told
that they are, indeed, perectly lawul. 1hat is, o course, always your
prerogatie should you decide to waste your time.
lor this reason it is important that you consider and respond to the
oer in substance. 1he 'nearest oicial orm' will not suice, and
consequently is likely to be ignored by mysel without any dishonour on
my part.
On the other hand there is a time-limit on the agreement being oered.
It is reasonable, and i it runs out then you and all associated parties are in
deault, remoing any and all lawul excuse on your part or proceeding in
this matter.
lor these reasons it is recommended that you careully consider this
notice and respond in substance, which means actually addressing the
points raised herein.
)*(
\ou hae apparently made allegations o unacceptable conduct on my
part.
\ou hae apparently made demands upon me.
I do not understand those apparent demands and thereore cannot
lawully ulill them. I seek clariication o your document so that I may
act according to the law and maintain my entire body o inalienable
Natural Rights.
lailure to accept this oer to clariy and to do so completely and in
good aith within ,seen, days will be deemed by all parties to mean you
and your principal or other parties abandon all demands upon me.
I conditionally accept your oer to agree that I am legal iction 'person'
19 and that I owe _20 or serices rendered by your company, upon
proo o claim o all o the ollowing:
1. Upon proo o claim that I am a person, and not a human being.
2. Upon proo o claim that you know what a 'person' actually is, in
legal terms.
3. Upon proo o claim that you know the dierence between a 'human
being' and a 'person', legally speaking.
4. Upon proo o claim that you know the dierence between 'legal'
and a 'lawul'.
5. Upon proo o claim that I am legal iction 'person' 19, being the
entity to which your paperwork was addressed, and not 1: o the 18
amily, as commonly called.
6. Upon proo o claim that the charge was the result o a lawul
inestigation unmarred by prejudice.
. Upon proo o claim that I am a member o the society whose
statutes and subsisting regulations you are enorcing.
8. Upon proo o claim that I showed you some sort o identiication.
9 Upon proo o claim that there is a nameable society that I belong to
and that the laws coered within any alleged transgressions state that they
apply to me within that named society.
1: o the 18 amily
))*
)))
Court de facto Summons Rebuttal.
the ollowing:
~ \our PostCode
9 ~ Summons Reerence Number
10 ~ Summons Reerence Date
11 ~ Court Name,Address Line 1
12 ~ Court Address Line 2
1 ~ \our Gien Name
19 ~ 1he Legal liction Name, exactly as printed in the Summons.
))!
In care o:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Near: ||
8
Notice of Request for Clarification of Paperwork Received.
1o:
1he Clerk o the Court
11
12
13
14
15
16
Dear Sirs,
1he enclosed paperwork was deliered to the address at which I dwell.
It was addressed in the name 19.
I hae been led to beliee this signiies that the paperwork was
addressed to a legal iction known as a PLRSON, which is, in point o
act, the name o some CORPORA1ION.
I would be most grateul i you would kindly conirm or deny my
understanding in this respect.
As a soereign luman Being, with a liing soul, and consequently ,as I
understand it, under Common Law jurisdiction ,i.e. the law-o-the-land,
as opposed to Corporate or Statute Law, namely the law-o-the-sea,, I am
not entirely sure why I hae receied this paperwork, and would be
grateul or any clariication in this matter. I hae no wish to dishonour
any alid and lawul obligation on my part.
Article 45 o the Magna Carta 1215 states quite clearly: "We will
appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only those who
know the law of the realm and who wish to observe it well", and this
cannot be repealed or oided in any way because it pre-dates all
Parliaments, and urthermore the document itsel says so in other Articles.
))"
And said document bears the Royal Seal. In consequence o this I assume
you can clariy, in lay terms, the points raised herein.
According to Dun & Bradstreet there is a registered company known as
11. Since it is possible to obtain a D&B Credit Report on said company,
it seems reasonable to assume that it is in business, actiely trading, and
oering serices. Please conirm that your good seles hae no
connection with said 1rading Company, and that said paperwork was not
an issuance rom it, being merely an oer to proide a serice.
1: o the 18 amily
))#
Ireedom of Information interactions with HM 1reasury
Appendix B: Freedom of nformation interactions
with HM Treasury
here is a \ebsite that proides or UK lreedom o Inormation
Requests, called !batDo1be,Kvor.cov. I made the ollowing
lreedom o Inormation Request to lM 1reasury on 3rd
lebruary, 2009:
1
Dear Sir or Madam,
Under the Ireedom of Information Act I would like an
answer to the following question:
How, precisely, is money created?
Ior your information I have been given to understand that
it is created by means of Promissory Notes. In more detail,
when a human being signs a 'promise to pay' (known
colloquially as an IOU), which can stand until the end of
time. And that the human being's signature on that promise
renders said promise lawful.
Can you please be so kind as to confirm or deny my
understanding and, if necessary, correct my understanding?
1hank you.
Yours faithfully, . etc.
I was told that they did not need to answer such questions under the
lreedom o Inormation Act. 1hat they were only required to pull
numbers rom their databases, in response to requests or such numbers.
loweer, as a kindness to me, they would respond as they were able.
A copy of their response is Iigures BJ & B2.
Paul Morran had not answered my question, but did supply, in
Paragraph , sentence 2, the answer: Yov are correct iv e..evce tbat tbi.
avovvt. to av O|. And there were some nuggets o inormation in
Paragraph 5, or example, sentence 3: `Moaerv cvrrevc,` i. /vorv a. fiat`
vove,; it i. artificiatt, createa, ba. vo ratve iv it.etf ..
))$
ligure B1: lirst response rom lM 1reasury ,1
st
Page,.
))%
ligure B2: lirst response rom lM 1reasury ,2
nd
Page,.
))&
Rather than bog up the lreedom o Inormation website, I decided to
take Paul Morran up on this oer to contact him urther. So I sent the
ollowing e-mail:
Dear Sirs,
I recently submitted a Ireedom of Information request that
can be read via this link: http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/
request/the_creation_of_money
It was responded to very courteously by your colleague Mr.
Paul Morran.
However the fundamental question was only answered by
default. Nevertheless that default answer is now the law-of-
the-land, in other words now becomes a part of established
Common Law.
Based on that situation, and under Common Law courtesy,
I am now writing to you for further - more detailed - answers
in the form of specific clarifications.
Please remain assured that I do not wish to 'pull rank'.
1hat is, by being a Member of the Public. A Human Being
who, by virtue of my supreme and absolute power, colludes
with others of the same rank to provide your ultimate
authorisation for existence as 'HM 1reasury'.
You may consider that your authorisation derives from
empowerment by Government Statute. 1hat is fair enough,
but who empowers the Government? 1he Queen? Wrong
answer, because who empowers the Queen?
1here is only one answer. 1hose with the power to do that.
Which is us, the Human Beings who populate this Country of
ours.
We empower the Queen via the Coronation Oath. We
empower the Government by elections.
You cannot give someone, or even some 'body' (such as a
group of representatives), more than you, yourself, possess.
Consequently no-one can empower either the Monarch, or
the Government (or HM 1reasury) with more power than
they, themselves, possess.
All this is just saying one thing: If I ask a question with due
courtesy, I have the inalienable Right to have it answered
courteously, IN IULL, on pain of perjury and full
))'
commercial liability, and IN 1RU1H (as far as is
practicable).
You have extended Common Law courtesy until now. And
I have responded as courteously as was (I think) possible.
And I sincerely hope that will continue.
So now I ask you ('money' is henceforth in quotes as
defined by Mr. Morran in his original answer):
J) Who authorises the creation of 'money'? Upon whose
signature (or signatures) is it created? 2) Ior what reason is
AN AMOUN1 created? 3) Do you hold a Live Birth 1rust (or
some such) for each individual who is alive? If so, is the
Reference Number the same as a National Insurance
Number, and is any such account 'named' to the legal fiction
PLRSON of that individual? And, furthermore, if this is the
case, is the associated Human Being Prime Creditor on the
account?
1here may be more questions, depending on your truthful
answers, which I trust can be responded to within a matter of
a few days at the very most.
If there is any reason why you cannot give answers, then
please be so kind as to direct me to a source of them.
I thank you in anticipation,
Sincerely, without ill-will, frivolity or vexation,
Veronica: of the Chapman family as commonly called, a
live Human being with a living soul. "Veronica: Chapman",
for short (there is no "Ms.", "Miss" or "Mrs.", because those
are legal fiction PLRSONS and not my Human Self. Only my
Human Self has (a) a Mind with which to devise these
questions and interpret/comprehend the answers and (b)
Lyes with which to read the answers)
And I received back the letter shown in Iigures B3 & B4.
I analysed this response as follows:
My requests seem to ind their way back to Paul: o the Morran
amily. le is turning into being one o my aourite people o all
time.
Notice he addresses me as Veronica: of the Chapman
family! But what does his response mean
))(
ligure B3: Second response or lM 1reasury ,1
st
Page,.
)!*
ligure B4: Second response rom lM 1reasury ,2
nd
Page,.
)!)
+
\ell, irst o all we are being directed to the Currency Act 1983.
At the time o writing I hae not looked at this, but certainly will.
(Now been looked at ... see below)
More importantly, in my iew, we now hae it in writing that:
cvrrevc, i. i..vea iv re.ov.e to aevava.
And: f aevava eceeaea araitabitit,, v.er. rovta be cov.traivea to va/e
greater v.e of cbeqve. ava etectrovic trav.fer.. Very curious way o saying
something Because what, exactly, is it actually saying
linally Paul: Morran goes on to deny the existence o Lie Birth
1rusts, and any connection with one's National Insurance Number.
An interesting response, all told, but it begs so many questions:
1. currency is issued in response to demand \hose
demand Maybe this is coered in the Currency Act
2. If demand exceeded availability, users would be
constrained to make greater use of cheques and electronic
transfers. I demand exceeded aailability \hose demand ... see
aboe. 'Availability' ... whaaaaat Paul has already told us that:
'vove, ba. vo ratve. '1he availability of something without value'
means what 'Money' is nothing more than an idea, a belief. 1he
availability of beliefs is infinite.
3. 'users' Is that us I assume so. But that is not, necessarily the
case. It could easily mean just Banks, Building Societies, etc. 1hose
who directly interace with lM 1reasury. I'm not sure what this
means.
4. And: these users would be constrained to make greater
use of cheques and electronic transfers 1o do what 1o pass
'money' around, but what money \here is it coming rom ,to be
passed around under constraints,
All in all, this seems to be totally circular. \ell, almost. I think
progress is being made, slowly but surely.
I can't see how anything here actually contradicts anything else
I'e said, except that we are haing Lie Birth 1rusts dismissed. I
ind the latter so hard to beliee. Accounting and bookkeeping
practices absolutely scream some kind o mechanism like that, tied
to the National Insurance Number. 1hey could not possibly run a
ree-or-all system. It is against the ingrained robotic nature o any
Accountant. Accounts must add up. Otherwise Accountants hae
no 'proession' to speak o.
)!!
And why, in that case, is our National Insurance Number
demanded let, right, centre, on all 'oicial paperwork', and a
considerable amount o 'priate', or 'non-oicial', paperwork
And, subsequently, after reading most of the Currency Act:
1his just seems to deal with the standards or minting, etc.
,As i it makes any dierence to a Belie System. An Idea. An
Illusion,
Notice ... there it is again: 'bank notes' means notes of the
Bank payable to bearer on demand. 1otally circular. Chasing the
roots o 'money' will hae you running round in circles. \ou might
as well chase rainbows or unicorns, which is the same thing.
Leryone would get the actual idea i the banknote said: rovi.e
to a, tbe earer ov aevava : vvicorv.. \hich would be just as true as
what it actually says.
loweer there was one bit I laughed at: ;2) or tbe vro.e. of
tbi. .ectiov, tbe tivit i. _1,:00 vittiov or .vcb otber avovvt a. va, frov
tive to tive be .ecifiea iv a airectiov girev b, tbe 1rea.vr,.
\ea ... tell that to Gordon Brown.
So. No. \e still don't know the answers to the questions I
asked. 1hese are:
J. How is 'money' created? (How is the belief manifested
in the form of 1okens?) 2. Ior what reason is 'an amount'
created? 3. Who looks at that reason, decides it is valid, and
therefore authorises the creation of 'an amount'? 4. How is
'an amount that has been created passed into circulation'?
Who is it passed to, and why?
And the answers are contained within this book. Because there
is no other way.
\hy am I so concerned about this Is it because I want buckets
o it
Actually no, that's not the reason at all. I would like to see us get
rid o it once and or all.
1he reason I'm so concerned is because I don't like having the
michael taken out of me. 1hat's the reason. And I don't see why
the michael should be taken out o eeryone else, either. 1hat's the
reason.
And I don't see why people o all shapes, sizes and ages should
be bombed, shot, maimed, killed, tortured, put through
)!"
excruciating agonies, enslaed in the most draconian manner ... all
based on a mickey-take. 1hat's the main reason.
So I sent another e-mail. 1his is what I said:
PLLASL IORWARD 1HIS L-MAIL (AS NLCLSSARY)
1O YOUR COLLLAGUL PAUL: MORRAN
Dear Paul: of the Morran family,
I cannot thank you enough for the responses you have
already made. I don't know whether or not you are irritated
by my persistence. I hope not, because the questions I've
asked affect yourself, your family, your friends, and everyone
else.
I fully appreciate that you have strived manfully to answer
the questions I have raised in the past.
But we still have not got to the heart of the matter.
1hank you for the reference to the Currency Act J983, but -
by my reading - that only defines the standards for coinage
and banknotes such as to be acceptable legal tender, and
does not really answer my questions.
May we please start again?
May I please ask you the following question?
"Is HM 1reasury the SOLL authority that regulates the
issuance of 'an amount' IN1O CIRCULA1ION at any point
in time?" (1his does not mean the production of coins
and/or banknotes that represent 'money'. You have already
answered that as the Royal Mint and the Bank of Lngland,
respectively)
What I'm trying to get to is: Who tells the Royal Mint to
issue a certain number of coins? Who tells the Bank of
Lngland to issue a certain number of banknotes? Who ... if
not HM 1reasury?
Best + thanking you in anticipation + apologies if you find
this irritating,
Veronica: of the Chapman family.
1he response I received is Iigures BS & B6.
)!#
ligure B5: 1hird response or lM 1reasury ,1
st
Page,.
)!$
ligure B6: 1hird response rom lM 1reasury ,2
nd
Page,.

)!%
I decided it was time to pull out all the stops, so I sent the
following e-mail:
Dear Paul,
1hank you once again for your kind response.
You say, in (S) you are disappointed at my statement about
not yet having got to the heart of the matter' and that you
have to consider the resources available to answer me. I
understand that, of course. However I do write on behalf of
not just myself. All the information you have provided is
valuable, in my humble opinion. And many others are
watching this correspondence which is - after all - public
information, of course.
I would say that your answers have, actually, moved the
situation a little closer to the heart of the matter each time,
and some progress has been made.
OK. Well, in (S) you say that you do not understand what
the heart of the matter is for me. May I then please try to
explain, as far as I am able?
1he heart of the matter, what I'm trying to get to, was
actually in my very first IoI question.
And I suggested an answer, and requested confirmation or
denial.
I suggested that money was created on the basis of
Promissory Notes. And, in your first response, you said that
this was true "in essence". But you did not say it was true "in
fact". Which is different.
So, the heart of the matter is this:
J. What, precise, mechanism causes the release of 'some
amount'? It must require some authority. Whose authority?
2. What defines 'the amount'?
3. How does this created money 'get into circulation'?
Now we know the answer to (3) above is not that it is
dropped from an airplane. Nor is it just because a bank may
up and demand it (otherwise banks and building societies
would not go out of business ... and what gives them a
priority right to make such a demand, anyway?). (Although,
of course, the recent bailouts were, precisely, 'because the
)!&
banks demanded it'. But this is very unusual, as I'm sure you
will agree. Hence all the furor)
If you want me to suggest answers for your consideration,
answers that get to the heart of the matter, and may therefore
explain to you what I consider to be the heart of the matter,
then my considered understandings would be:
J. 1he precise mechanism for the creation of money is
based on a Promissory Note, an IOU, signed by ANY
individual when applying for a loan, mortgage, or equivalent.
A 'promise to pay back'. (But, as you have already said,
'money is fiat, it has no value' ... so the 'pay back' is an empty
promise ... just like the empty promise on a banknote itself)
2. 1he amount is the amount of the loan.
3. It is moved into circulation by making the amount
available to whoever made the promise as a credit to an
account on which s/he can draw upon. (Obviously, as you
have explained, there are Statutory limits placed on this
mechanism, such that it doesn't run off into infinity. Ior
example by raising Interest Rates such that the Promissory
Notes generated by loan applications (J) become fewer)
Now that is what I consider to be the heart of the matter.
1hat's what I asked. 1hose are my understood answers.
Am I right or am I wrong?
Have I made my standpoint clear?
Kind regards + thanks for your kind attention,
Veronica: of the Chapman family
I received the response shown as Iigure B7.
I decided to partially gie up ,although not completely,, and sent back
on passing shot:
Dear Paul: of the Morran family,
1hank you for your e-mail.
I specifically gave you the answers to the questions I
actually asked, in terms of confirmation or denial. I did not
wish to do that, because I did not wish to be accused of
putting words into your mouth, preferring instead to rely on
your intellectual honesty. But, as our correspondence
progressed, you left me no choice.
)!'
You did not deny my suggested answers. But, of course,
you did not confirm them either. I leave you to consider
whether or not intellectual honesty reined supreme.
Anyway, I will assume you have done your best in very
trying circumstances (i.e. 'someone like me'), and so I will
just say thank you for the information you did provide.
1he link to the Bank of Lngland you supplied, goes to a
page that mainly comprises Sponsorship Adverts and
information about Interest Rates. I know I mentioned
Interest Rates in my previous e-mail, but that was only in the
nature of an example.
I care not one jot about any Rates of Interest, and did not
ask any questions about them. Simply because the
mechanism for creating money does not create sufficient to
cover any Interest at all.
1his leaves the entire economy (in total) in perpetual,
never-ending, 'can-never-be-paid-off' debt - as I'm sure you
can understand.
Or, perhaps you can tell me how the monies to create the
Interest are produced? Well, no, because you refuse to
confirm how the Principal is even created ... so I won't even
bother to ask.
You hoped to 'allay my fears'. Did I give the impression I
was fearful in any way? If so, then I humbly apologise. 1hat
was never my intent. I care not one jot about counterfeiting
either. With respect, I think that is the Bank of Lngland's
problem, not mine. Any perceived value that results from
counterfeiting activities is only the same as the perceived
value of the banknotes themselves. And you have already told
me the banknotes themselves are intrinsically worthless.
Consequently those notes issued by the Bank of Lngland
have as much worth as counterfeit banknotes, do they not? So
why is counterfeiting a problem?
No need to answer that last question because the only
difference is that counterfeit notes are not issued under
'authority'. But whose authority ... that's the question. Which
specific person provides, or specific persons provide, the
authority? Do they work for HM 1reasury? What are their
names & Official 1itles? And how do they decide how much
fiat paper to authorise at any one time? And why? On what
)!(
basis is authority for issuance granted? 1hat's what I asked -
over an over again.
But it's quite plain those questions must remain officially
unanswered.
Lxcept that we know. 1hat's how we knew what questions
to ask, of course. Not confirmed ... but NO1 denied.
I doubt you have heard the last of this because, as you so
rightly say, others are catching on. Ior some reason they (a)
Understand what I'm getting at and (b) Seem to think my
questions are reasonable, and should be fully answered in
detail.
Regards + thanks for your help, anyway,
Veronica: of the Chapman family.
\hat is the result o all this \ell, we hae a lat denial that a 'Live
Birth 1rust Account' exists. But we hae no denial that it is not called by
some other name: 'Lxemption Account', or 'Redemption Account' are
two suggestions. \e hae a lat denial that this is tied to National
Insurance Numbers, but we hae no denial that it may be linked to Birth
Certiicate Numbers.
\e hae no denials because we hae not asked these questions, in the
appropriate way, is my best guess.
\e hae been gien reasonable suspicion that the questions need to be
asked in a speciic way, otherwise denial is obiously possible. I you use
the wrong name, then the act that it does not exist is perectly deniable.
\e hae no explanation or the act that our National Insurance
Numbers are required on just about eery scrap o Oicious Paperwork.
\e are let to wonder why that should be.
And we hae not had a denial that my suggested answers to: or
vove, i. createa were in any way incorrect. And denial would hae been a
piece o cake. All it would hae amounted to was: cav covfirv tbat ,ov are
rrovg.
So, there it sits. At the time o writing. But, as lreemanship opens out,
the answers will, I irmly beliee, hae to be orthcoming. 1he questions I
hae asked strike right into the heart o the illusion. One must expect a
certain amount o resistance.
)"*
ligure B: lourth response rom lM 1reasury
)")
But then, none o this should be a surprise. It appears that a genuinely-
concerned MP, by the name o Stokes, had a go at trying to ind out
something, along similar lines, back in the 1940s. le did not succeed
either. All he receied were smarmy, deious, dismissie, responses.
Here's some Hansard on and around this subject:
UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION.
lC Deb 22 October 1940 ol 365 c942\ 942\
Mr. Craen-Lllis: asked the President o the Board o 1rade whether the
ormation by the Goernment o the United Kingdom Corporation is
only a war-time measure, and will he gie assurance that the corporation
will be wound up immediately ater hostilities cease, so that the export
trade may low through its normal peace-time channels
Mr. Johnstone: 1he corporation was ormed with a iew to meeting
diiculties in oerseas trade which are due to conditions arising out o the
war. It is impossible to oresee the conditions that will obtain when
hostilities cease and, thereore, I cannot say whether at that date it will be
desirable to terminate the actiities o the corporation. 1hese actiities do
not, I think, disturb the normal channels o trade but I can assure my hon.
lriend that lis Majesty's Goernment hae eery desire that trade should
be reed rom war-time restrictions and be conducted in a normal manner
at the earliest possible date.
UNI1LD KINGDOM COMMLRCIAL CORPORA1ION
lC Deb 18 April 1944 ol 399 cc39-42\ 40\
Mr. Parker :asked the Chancellor o the Lxchequer i he will gie a list
o the names o the present directors o the United Kingdom Commercial
Corporation, together with a list o other directorships which they hold.
Sir J. Anderson: 1he list o directors o the United Kingdom
Commercial Corporation and o other directorships held by them is as
ollows:
Please note: Many, if not all, of these people are now dead. 1he
interesting part, for research purposes, is the Companies involved
)"!
Sir lrancis Joseph, Bt., K.B.L., D.L. ,Acting Chairman,
Directorships held:
Settle Speakman and Company Limited.
Mossield Colliery Limited.
Bignall lill Colliery Company Limited.
Stirrup and Pye Limited.
lenton Collieries Limited.
Staord Coal and Iron Company Limited.
1imber and \ood ,Merseyside, Limited.
A. & S. lenry and Company Limited.
Blaw-Knox Limited.
London Midland and Scottish Railway Company Limited.
Birmingham Railway Carriage and \agon Company Limited.
Midland Bank Limited.
Midland Bank Lxecutor and 1rustee Company Limited.
Rio 1into Company Limited.
Birmingham Small Arms Company Limited.
Birmingham Canal Naigations.
Dundalk, Newry and Greenore Railway Company.
Mr. A. Chester Beatty Directorships held:
American Metal Company Limited.
Boart Products, Limited.
Consolidated Arican Selection 1rust Limited.
Consolidated Diamond Mines o South \est Arica Limited.
Muulira Copper Mines Limited.
Northern Rhodesia Power Corporation Limited.
Rhodesian Selection 1rust Limited.
Roan Antelope Copper Mines Limited.
Selection 1rust Limited.
Seltrust Inestments Limited.
Sierra Leone Selection 1rust Limited.
1repea Mines Limited.
Union Corporation Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Portugal, Limited.
Selection Manuacturing Company Limited.
Central Mining and Inestment Corporation Limited.
Karamiat Lstates Limited.
)""
Mr. G. A. McLwen Directorships held:
Co-operatie \holesale Society Limited.
Chinese Purchasing Agency.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Spain, Limited.
Lord Swinton, Minister Resident in \est Arica, still retains the
post o Chairman o the Corporation.
Sir lrank Nixon Directorships held:
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Spain, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Portugal, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lthiopia, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lgypt, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lritrea, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Iran, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Iraq, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Palestine, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Sudan, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Syria and Lebanon, Ltd.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Last Arica, Limited.
Mr. J. l. lambro Directorships held:
lambros Bank, Limited.
lambro 1rust, Limited.
Ashdown Inestment 1rust, Limited.
British and Continental Banking Company, Limited.
John Dickinson and Company, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Spain,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Portugal,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lthiopia,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Last Arica,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lgypt,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Lritrea,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Iran,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Iraq,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Palestine,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Sudan,, Limited.
United Kingdom Commercial Corporation ,Syria and Lebanon,,
Limited.
)"#
Mr. C. P. Lister Directorships held:
R. A. Lister and Company, Limited.
Blackstone and Company, Limited.
S.A. R. A. Lister et Cie.
Mr. L. C. Paton Directorships held:
larrisons and Crosield ,Canada,, Limited.
larrisons and Crosield ,Borneo,, Limited.
larrisons, Barker and Company, Limited.
\ilkinson Rubber Linatex, Limited.
\ilkinson Sales Corporation ,Canada,, Limited.
British Borneo 1imber Company, Limited.
Captain J. A. Leighton Directorships held:
Stelp and Leighton, Limited.
J. l. \ackerbarth and Company, Limited. Southampton Steamship
Company.
Crete Shipping Company.
Sark Motorships, Limited.
Guernsey, Alderney and Sark Steamship Company.
R. C. lardman Sons, Limited.
Lionel Ldwards, Limited, Calcutta, India and any associated or
subsidiary companies registered in India, Burma or Ceylon, and
including the name "Lionel Ldwards" in their title.
Mr. L. J. Shearer Directorships held:
Molyneux et Cie, Limited.
Surey and General Loan Company, Limited.
Mr. A. D. Campbell Directorships held:
lorbes, Campbell and Company, Limited.
George and R. Dewhurst, Limited.
Manchester Ship Canal Company.
\aring and Gillow ,19312,, Limited.
)"$
Martins Bank ,Manchester Branch,.
Manchester Chamber o Commerce.
Mr. L. l. Leer Directorships held:
Richard 1homas and Company, Limited.
Glasbrook Brothers, Limited.
Clayton 1in Plate Company, Limited.
Graesend Steel and 1inplate Company, Limited.
l. l. Spencer and Company, Limited.
Lancaster's Steam Coal Collieries, Limited.
Monks, lall and Company, Limited.
New Sharlston Collieries Company, Limited.
R.1. Metal Productions, Limited.
Richard Neill and Company, Limited.
S. J. Burrell Prior, Limited.
South \ales 1inplate Corporation, Limited.
Swansea Naigation Collieries, Limited.
\. Gilbertson and Company, Limited.
\hitehead 1homas Bar and Strip Company, Limited.
New Money (Creation)
lC Deb 18 April 1944 ol 399 cc30-1 30
58. Mr. Stokes: asked the Chancellor o the Lxchequer whether he will
in uture hae recourse to the creation o new money without interest
instead o adding to the olume o bank adances to the 1reasury as this
would be no more inlationary and would cost the country less.
Sir J. Anderson: No, Sir.
Mr. Stokes: \ill the Chancellor explain why it is preerable in the
national interest to create new money with interest rather than create new
money without
Sir J. Anderson: My hon. lriend knows ery well that I do not accept
his monetary theories. le really cannot expect me to argue the matter
with him at Question time.
New Money
lC Deb 2 April 1944 ol 399 cc924-5 924
)"%
Mr. Stokes: asked the Chancellor o the Lxchequer how he keeps check
o the amount o new money created.
1he Chancellor o the Lxchequer ,Sir John Anderson,: I do not ind it
necessary to attempt any such record as my hon. lriend suggests.
Mr. Stokes: But that is not an answer to my Question. Am I to
understand rom the Chancellor that he keeps no check on the amount o
new money brought into circulation
Sir J. Anderson: I keep no such check as my hon. lriend seems to hae
in mind. I he will study the \hite Paper, published on 1uesday-which
he will ind a eritable mine o inormation-perhaps he will then be
good enough to indicate to me just what practical purpose he thinks such
a record or check as he has in mind would sere.
Mr. Stokes: But is the Chancellor aware that competent authorities are
o the opinion that something in the order o _1,500,000,000 has been
created by the banks since the war began, at little cost to the banks and at
great cost to the community Does he not think it is his responsibility to
see how much new money has been created Surely it b a matter o
business.
Sir J. Anderson: My hon. lriend reerred to "competent authorities," but
I am aware that the question o who is a competent authority is also a
matter o opinion.
Government Stock (Interest Payments)
lC Deb 11 May 1944 ol 399 cc2086- 208
Mr. Graham \hite: asked the linancial Secretary to the 1reasury i
consideration has been gien to the desirability o saing labour and paper
by making arrangements or the payment o interest on 2' per cent.
Consols and other 1rustee Securities by hal-yearly instead o quarterly
payments.
Mr. Assheton: \es, Sir. As regards Goernment stocks on which
diidends are paid quarterly, it has been established that in iew o the
limited amount o debt inoled, no appreciable saing o labour or paper
would be achieed by the suggested alteration. 1he arrangement has
deinite adantages, or certain classes o inestors. A change o practice
would require amendment o the law, and I do not think that a case has
been made or it.
)"&
International Monetary Iund (Joint Statement)
lC Deb 16 May 1944 ol 400 c31 31
Mr. Stokes: asked the Chancellor o the Lxchequer whether the British
experts who collaborated in drawing up the Joint Statement by experts on
the establishment o an International Monetary lund were 1reasury
oicials, and, i not, rom what organisations were they selected.
Sir J. Anderson: \es, Sir. Apart rom Lord Keynes, the United Kingdom
experts who collaborated in drawing up the Joint Statement were
permanent 1reasury oicials and whole-time temporary oicials who
hae been in the serice o the Goernment throughout the war.
Mr. Stokes: Can the Chancellor assure the louse that the whole-time
temporary serants who hae been in the employment o the 1reasury or
the period o the war are not drawn either rom commercial or banking
interests
Sir J. Anderson: No, Sir, I do not think I could gie such an assurance as
that.
)"'
Magna Carta J2JS
Appendix C: Magna Carta 1215
his is the Magna Carta 1215. 1he original one. I contains within it
wording to the eect that it cannot be superseded. It stands
behind all other Law, speciically Statute Law. 1he reason is simply
that there was no such thing as 'Parliament' when this 1reaty was enacted
between the Nobility ,at the time, and the Monarch ,at the time - King
John,.
1
As a consequence any Parliamentary Statute is bound by it. Any Statute
that attempts to supersede it is null & oid in Law. 1his renders all
Parliamentary Statutes either ,a, Null & oid or ,b, Ineectie - since they
can only quote Common Law anyway, and it is pointless to enorce
something that is already in orce as Law.
And this renders each and eery one o the 111,000-plus Statutes,
enacted on the basis o implementing LU Directies, as totally pointless
wastes o time & eort.
All you hae to do is know. And stand up for yourself. You have an
LU Referendum'. 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.
Some o the most important sections o the Great Charter hae been
highlighted in bold italics:
John, by the grace o God, king o Lngland, lord o Ireland,
duke o Normandy and Aquitaine, and count o Anjou, to
the archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls, barons, justiciars,
oresters, sheris, stewards, serants, and to all his bailis
and aithul subjects, greeting. Know that we, out o
reerence or God and or the salation o our soul and
those o all our ancestors and heirs, or the honour o God
and the exaltation o holy church, and or the reorm o our
realm, on the adice o our enerable athers, Stephen,
archbishop o Canterbury, primate o all Lngland and
cardinal o the holy Roman church, lenry archbishop o
Dublin, \illiam o London, Peter o \inchester, Jocelyn o
Bath and Glastonbury, lugh o Lincoln, \alter o
\orcester, \illiam o Coentry and Benedict o Rochester,
bishops, o master Pandul, subdeacon and member o the
household o the lord pope, o brother Aymeric, master o
the order o Knights 1emplar in Lngland, and o the noble
men \illiam Marshal earl o Pembroke, \illiam earl o
Salisbury, \illiam earl o \arenne, \illiam earl o Arundel,
)"(
Alan o Galloway constable o Scotland, \arin itz Gerold,
Peter itz lerbert, lubert de Burgh seneschal o Poitou,
lugh de Neille, Matthew itz lerbert, 1homas Basset,
Alan Basset, Philip de Aubeney, Robert o Ropsley, John
Marshal, John itz lugh, and others, our aithul subjects: |1|
In the irst place hae granted to God, and by this our
present charter conirmed or us and our heirs or eer that
the Lnglish church shall be ree, and shall hae its rights
undiminished and its liberties unimpaired, and it is our will
that it be thus obsered, which is eident rom the act that,
beore the quarrel between us and our barons began, we
willingly and spontaneously granted and by our charter
conirmed the reedom o elections which is reckoned most
important and ery essential to the Lnglish church, and
obtained conirmation o it rom the lord pope Innocent III,
the which we will obsere and we wish our heirs to obsere
it in good aith or eer.
We have also granted to all free men of our kingdom,
for ourselves and our heirs for ever, all the liberties
written below, to be had and held by them and their
heirs, of us and our heirs for ever:
2 I any o our earls or barons or others holding o us in
chie by knight serice dies, and at his death his heir be o
ull age and owe relie he shall hae his inheritance on
payment o the old relie, namely the heir or heirs o an earl
_ 100 or a whole earl's barony, the heir or heirs o a baron
_100 or a whole barony, the heir or heirs o a knight 100s,
at most, or a whole knight's ee, and he who owes less shall
gie less according to the ancient usage o ies.
3 I, howeer, the heir o any such be under age and a
ward, he shall hae his inheritance when he comes o age
without paying relie and without making ine.
4 1he guardian o the land o such an heir who is under
age shall take rom the land o the heir no more than
reasonable reenues, reasonable customary dues and
reasonable serices and that without destruction and waste
o men or goods, and i we commit the wardship o the land
o any such to a sheri, or to any other who is answerable to
us or its reenues, and he destroys or wastes what he has
wardship o, we will take compensation rom him and the
land shall be committed to two lawul and discreet men o
)#*
Magna Carta J2JS
that ie, who shall be answerable or the reenues to us or
to him to whom we hae assigned them, and i we gie or
sell to anyone the wardship o any such land and he causes
destruction or waste therein, he shall lose that wardship, and
it shall be transerred to two lawul and discreet men o that
ie, who shall similarly be answerable to us as is aoresaid.
S Moreoer, so long as he has the wardship o the land,
the guardian shall keep in repair the houses, parks, preseres,
ponds, mills and other things pertaining to the land out o
the reenues rom it, and he shall restore to the heir when he
comes o age his land ully stocked with ploughs and the
means o husbandry according to what the season o
husbandry requires and the reenues o the land can
reasonably bear.
6 leirs shall be married without disparagement, yet so that
beore the marriage is contracted those nearest in blood to
the heir shall hae notice.
7 A widow shall have her marriage portion and
inheritance forthwith and without difficulty after the
death of her husband, nor shall she pay anything to
have her dower or her marriage portion or the
inheritance which she and her husband held on the day
of her husband's death, and she may remain in her
husband's house for forty days after his death, within
which time her dower shall be assigned to her.
8 No widow shall be orced to marry so long as she wishes
to lie without a husband, proided that she gies security
not to marry without our consent i she holds o us, or
without the consent o her lord o whom she holds, i she
holds o another.
9 Neither we nor our bailis will seize or any debt any
land or rent, so long as the chattels o the debtor are
suicient to repay the debt, nor will those who hae gone
surety or the debtor be distrained so long as the principal
debtor is himsel able to pay the debt, and i the principal
debtor ails to pay the debt, haing nothing wherewith to
pay it, then shall the sureties answer or the debt, and they
shall, i they wish, hae the lands and rents o the debtor
until they are reimbursed or the debt which they hae paid
or him, unless the principal debtor can show that he has
discharged his obligation in the matter to the said sureties.
)#)
J0 I anyone who has borrowed rom the Jews any sum,
great or small, dies beore it is repaid, the debt shall not bear
interest as long as the heir is under age, o whomsoeer he
holds, and i the debt alls into our hands, we will not take
anything except the principal mentioned in the bond.
JJ And i anyone dies indebted to the Jews, his wie shall
hae her dower and pay nothing o that debt, and i the dead
man leaes children who are under age, they shall be
proided with necessaries beitting the holding o the
deceased, and the debt shall be paid out o the residue,
resering, howeer, serice due to lords o the land, debts
owing to others than Jews shall be dealt with in like manner.
J2 No scutage or aid shall be imposed in our kingdom
unless by common counsel o our kingdom, except or
ransoming our person, or making our eldest son a knight,
and or once marrying our eldest daughter, and or these
only a reasonable aid shall be leied. Be it done in like
manner concerning aids rom the city o London.
J3 And the city of London shall have all its ancient
liberties and free customs as well by land as by water.
Iurthermore, we will and grant that all other cities,
boroughs, towns, and ports shall have all their liberties
and free customs.
J4 And to obtain the common counsel o the kingdom
about the assessing o an aid ,except in the three cases
aoresaid, or o a scutage, we will cause to be summoned the
archbishops, bishops, abbots, earls and greater barons,
indiidually by our letters--and, in addition, we will cause to
be summoned generally through our sheris and bailis all
those holding o us in chie--or a ixed date, namely, ater
the expiry o at least orty days, and to a ixed place, and in
all letters o such summons we will speciy the reason or the
summons. And when the summons has thus been made, the
business shall proceed on the day appointed, according to
the counsel o those present, though not all hae come who
were summoned.
JS \e will not in uture grant any one the right to take an
aid rom his ree men, except or ransoming his person, or
making his eldest son a knight and or once marrying his
eldest daughter, and or these only a reasonable aid shall be
leied.
)#!
Magna Carta J2JS
J6 No one shall be compelled to do greater serice or a
knight's ee or or any other ree holding than is due rom it.
J7 Common pleas shall not ollow our court, but shall be
held in some ixed place.
J8 Recognitions o noel disseisin, o mort d'ancester, and
o darrein presentment, shall not be held elsewhere than in
the counties to which they relate, and in this manner--we, or,
i we should be out o the realm, our chie justiciar, will send
two justices through each county our times a year, who,
with our knights o each county chosen by the county, shall
hold the said assizes in the county and on the day and in the
place o meeting o the county court.
J9 And i the said assizes cannot all be held on the day o
the county court, there shall stay behind as many o the
knights and reeholders who were present at the county
court on that day as are necessary or the suicient making
o judgments, according to the amount o business to be
done.
20 A free man shall not be amerced for a trivial
offence except in accordance with the degree of the
offence, and for a grave offence he shall be amerced in
accordance with its gravity, yet saving his way of living,
and a merchant in the same way, saving his stock-in-
trade, and a villein shall be amerced in the same way,
saving his means of livelihood--if they have fallen into
our mercy: and none of the aforesaid amercements
shall be imposed except by the oath of good men of the
neighbourhood.
2J Larls and barons shall not be amerced except by their
peers, and only in accordance with the degree o the oence.
22 No clerk shall be amerced in respect o his lay holding
except ater the manner o the others aoresaid and not
according to the amount o his ecclesiastical beneice.
23 No ill or indiidual shall be compelled to make bridges
at rier banks, except those who rom o old are legally
bound to do so.
24 No sheri, constable, coroners, or others o our
bailis, shall hold pleas o our crown.
)#"
2S All counties, hundreds, wapentakes and trithings shall
be at the old rents without any additional payment, exept our
demesne manors.
26 I anyone holding a lay ie o us dies and our sheri or
baili shows our letters patent o summons or a debt that
the deceased owed us, it shall be lawul or our sheri or
baili to attach and make a list o chattels o the deceased
ound upon the lay ie to the alue o that debt under the
superision o law-worthy men, proided that none o the
chattels shall be remoed until the debt which is maniest
has been paid to us in ull, and the residue shall be let to the
executors or carrying out the will o the deceased. And i
nothing is owing to us rom him, all the chattels shall accrue
to the deceased, saing to his wie and children their
reasonable shares.
27 I any ree man dies without leaing a will, his chattels
shall be distributed by his nearest kinsolk and riends under
the superision o the church, saing to eery one the debts
which the deceased owed him.
28 No constable or other baili o ours shall take anyone's
corn or other chattels unless he pays on the spot in cash or
them or can delay payment by arrangement with the seller.
29 No constable shall compel any knight to gie money
instead o castle-guard i he is willing to do the guard himsel
or through another good man, i or some good reason he
cannot do it himsel, and i we lead or send him on military
serice, he shall be excused guard in proportion to the time
that because o us he has been on serice.
30 No sheriff, or bailiff of ours, or anyone else shall
take the horses or carts of any free man for transport
work save with the agreement of that freeman.
3J Neither we nor our bailis will take, or castles or other
works o ours, timber which is not ours, except with the
agreement o him whose timber it is.
32 \e will not hold or more than a year and a day the
lands o those conicted o elony, and then the lands shall
be handed oer to the lords o the ies.
33 lenceorth all ish-weirs shall be cleared completely
rom the 1hames and the Medway and throughout all
Lngland, except along the sea coast.
)##
Magna Carta J2JS
34 1he writ called Praecipe shall not in uture be issued to
anyone in respect o any holding whereby a ree man may
lose his court.
|35| Let there be one measure or wine throughout our
kingdom, and one measure or ale, and one measure or
corn, namely "the London quarter", and one width or
cloths whether dyed, russet or halberget, namely two ells
within the seledges. Let it be the same with weights as with
measures.
36 Nothing shall be gien or taken in uture or the writ o
inquisition o lie or limbs: instead it shall be granted ree o
charge and not reused.
37 I anyone holds o us by ee-arm, by socage, or by
burgage, and holds land o another by knight serice, we will
not, by reason o that ee-arm, socage, or burgage, hae the
wardship o his heir or o land o his that is o the ie o the
other, nor will we hae custody o the ee-arm, socage, or
burgage, unless such ee-arm owes knight serice. \e will
not hae custody o anyone's heir or land which he holds o
another by knight serice by reason o any petty serjeanty
which he holds o us by the serice o rendering to us knies
or arrows or the like.
38 In future no official shall place a man on trial upon
his own un-supported statement, without producing
credible witnesses to the truth of it.
39 No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or
stripped of his rights and possessions, or outlawed or
exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor
will we proceed with force against him, or send others
to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals
or by the law of the land.
40 1o no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay
right or justice.
4J All merchants shall be able to go out o and come into
Lngland saely and securely and stay and trael throughout
Lngland, as well by land as by water, or buying and selling
by the ancient and right customs ree rom all eil tolls,
except in time o war and i they are o the land that is at war
with us. And i such are ound in our land at the beginning
o a war, they shall be attached, without injury to their
)#$
persons or goods, until we, or our chie justiciar, know how
merchants o our land are treated who were ound in the
land at war with us when war broke out, and i ours are sae
there, the others shall be sae in our land.
42 It shall be lawul in uture or anyone, without
prejudicing the allegiance due to us, to leae our kingdom
and return saely and securely by land and water, sae, in the
public interest, or a short period in time o war--except or
those imprisoned or outlawed in accordance with the law o
the kingdom and naties o a land that is at war with us and
merchants ,who shall be treated as aoresaid,.
43 I anyone who holds o some escheat such as the
honour o \allingord, Nottingham, Boulogne, Lancaster,
or o other escheats which are in our hands and are baronies
dies, his heir shall gie no other relie and do no other
serice to us than he would hae done to the baron i that
barony had been in the baron's hands, and we will hold it in
the same manner in which the baron held it.
44 Men who lie outside the orest need not henceorth
come beore our justices o the orest upon a general
summons, unless they are impleaded or are sureties or any
person or persons who are attached or orest oences.
4S We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or
other officials, only men that know the law of the realm
and are minded to keep it well
46 All barons who hae ounded abbeys or which they
hae charters o the kings o Lngland or ancient tenure shall
hae the custody o them during acancies, as they ought to
hae.
47 All orests that hae been made orest in our time shall
be immediately disaorested, and so be it done with
rierbanks that hae been made preseres by us in our time.
48 All eil customs connected with orests and warrens,
oresters and warreners, sheris and their oicials,
rierbanks and their wardens shall immediately be inquired
into in each county by twele sworn knights o the same
county who are to be chosen by good men o the same
county, and within orty days o the completion o the
inquiry shall be utterly abolished by them so as neer to be
)#%
Magna Carta J2JS
restored, proided that we, or our justiciar i we are not in
Lngland, know o it irst.
49 \e will immediately return all hostages and charters
gien to us by Lnglishmen, as security or peace or aithul
serice.
S0 \e will remoe completely rom oice the relations o
Gerard de Athe so that in uture they shall hae no oice in
Lngland, namely Lngelard de Cigogn, Peter and Guy and
Andrew de Chanceaux, Guy de Cigogn, Georey de
Martigny and his brothers, Philip Marc and his brothers and
his nephew Georey, and all their ollowing.
SJ As soon as peace is restored, we will remoe rom the
kingdom all oreign knights, cross-bowmen, serjeants, and
mercenaries, who hae come with horses and arms to the
detriment o the kingdom.
S2 If anyone has been disseised of or kept out of his
lands, castles, franchises or his right by us without the
legal judgment of his peers, we will immediately restore
them to him: and i a dispute arises oer this, then let it be
decided by the judgment o the twenty-ie barons who are
mentioned below in the clause or securing the peace: or all
the things, howeer, which anyone has been disseised or
kept out o without the lawul judgment o his peers by king
lenry, our ather, or by king Richard, our brother, which we
hae in our hand or are held by others, to whom we are
bound to warrant them, we will hae the usual period o
respite o crusaders, excepting those things about which a
plea was started or an inquest made by our command beore
we took the cross, when howeer we return rom our
pilgrimage, or i by any chance we do not go on it, we will at
once do ull justice therein.
S3 \e will hae the same respite, and in the same manner,
in the doing o justice in the matter o the disaoresting or
retaining o the orests which lenry our ather or Richard
our brother aorested, and in the matter o the wardship o
lands which are o the ie o another, wardships o which
sort we hae hitherto had by reason o a ie which anyone
held o us by knight serice, and in the matter o abbeys
ounded on the ie o another, not on a ie o our own, in
which the lord o the ie claims he has a right, and when we
hae returned, or i we do not set out on our pilgrimage, we
)#&
will at once do ull justice to those who complain o these
things.
S4 No one shall be arrested or imprisoned upon the appeal
o a woman or the death o anyone except her husband.
SS All fines made with us unjustly and against the law
of the land, and all amercements imposed unjustly and
against the law of the land, shall be entirely remitted, or
else let them be settled by the judgment of the twenty-
five barons who are mentioned below in the clause for
securing the peace See Article 6J, or by the judgment o
the majority o the same, along with the aoresaid Stephen,
archbishop o Canterbury, i he can be present, and such
others as he may wish to associate with himsel or this
purpose, and i he cannot be present the business shall
neertheless proceed without him, proided that i any one
or more o the aoresaid twenty-ie barons are in a like suit,
they shall be remoed rom the judgment o the case in
question, and others chosen, sworn and put in their place by
the rest o the same twenty-ie or this case only.
S6 I we hae disseised or kept out \elshmen rom lands
or liberties or other things without the legal judgment o
their peers in Lngland or in \ales, they shall be immediately
restored to them, and i a dispute arises oer this, then let it
be decided in the March by the judgment o their peers--or
holdings in Lngland according to the law o Lngland, or
holdings in \ales according to the law o \ales, and or
holdings in the March according to the law o the March.
\elshmen shall do the same to us and ours.
S7 lor all the things, howeer, which any \elshman was
disseised o or kept out o without the lawul judgment o
his peers by king lenry, our ather, or king Richard, our
brother, which we hae in our hand or which are held by
others, to whom we are bound to warrant them, we will hae
the usual period o respite o crusaders, excepting those
things about which a plea was started or an inquest made by
our command beore we took the cross, when howeer we
return, or i by any chance we do not set out on our
pilgrimage, we will at once do ull justice to them in
accordance with the laws o the \elsh and the oresaid
regions.
)#'
Magna Carta J2JS
S8 \e will gie back at once the son o Llywelyn and all
the hostages rom \ales and the charters that were handed
oer to us as security or peace.
S9 \e will act toward Alexander, king o the Scots,
concerning the return o his sisters and hostages and
concerning his ranchises and his right in the same manner
in which we act towards our other barons o Lngland, unless
it ought to be otherwise by the charters which we hae rom
\illiam his ather, ormerly king o the Scots, and this shall
be determined by the judgment o his peers in our court.
60 All these aoresaid customs and liberties which we hae
granted to be obsered in our kingdom as ar as it pertains
to us towards our men, all o our kingdom, clerks as well as
laymen, shall obsere as ar as it pertains to them towards
their men.
6J Lawful Rebellion Since, moreoer, or God and the
betterment o our kingdom and or the better allaying o the
discord that has arisen between us and our barons we hae
granted all these things aoresaid, wishing them to enjoy the
use o them unimpaired and unshaken or eer, we gie and
grant them the under-written security, namely, that the
barons shall choose any twenty-ie barons o the kingdom
they wish, who must with all their might obsere, hold and
cause to be obsered, the peace and liberties which we hae
granted and conirmed to them by this present charter o
ours, so that i we, or our justiciar, or our bailis or any one
o our serants oend in any way against anyone or
transgress any o the articles o the peace or the security and
the oence be notiied to our o the aoresaid twenty-ie
barons, those our barons shall come to us, or to our
justiciar i we are out o the kingdom, and, laying the
transgression beore us, shall petition us to hae that
transgression corrected without delay. And if we do not
correct the transgression, or if we are out of the
kingdom, if our justiciar does not correct it, within forty
days, reckoning from the time it was brought to our
notice or to that of our justiciar if we were out of the
kingdom, the aforesaid four barons shall refer that case
to the rest of the twenty-five barons and those twenty-
five barons together with the community of the whole
land shall distrain and distress us in every way they
can, namely, by seizing castles, lands, possessions, and
)#(
in such other ways as they can, saving our person and
the persons of our queen and our children, until, in
their opinion, amends have been made, and when
amends have been made, they shall obey us as they did
before. And let anyone in the land who wishes take an oath
to obey the orders o the said twenty-ie barons or the
execution o all the aoresaid matters, and with them to
distress us as much as he can, and we publicly and reely gie
anyone leae to take the oath who wishes to take it and we
will neer prohibit anyone rom taking it. Indeed, all those in
the land who are unwilling o themseles and o their own
accord to take an oath to the twenty-ie barons to help
them to distrain and distress us, we will make them take the
oath as aoresaid at our command. And i any o the twenty-
ie barons dies or leaes the country or is in any other way
preented rom carrying out the things aoresaid, the rest o
the aoresaid twenty-ie barons shall choose as they think
it another one in his place, and he shall take the oath like
the rest. In all matters the execution o which is committed
to these twenty-ie barons, i it should happen that these
twenty-ie are present yet disagree among themseles about
anything, or i some o those summoned will not or cannot
be present, that shall be held as ixed and established which
the majority o those present ordained or commanded,
exactly as i all the twenty-ie had consented to it, and the
said twenty-ie shall swear that they will aithully obsere
all the things aoresaid and will do all they can to get them
obsered. And we will procure nothing from anyone,
either personally or through anyone else, whereby any
of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or
diminished, and if any such thing is procured, let it be
void and null, and we will never use it either personally
or through another.
62 And we hae ully remitted and pardoned to eeryone
all the ill-will, indignation and rancour that hae arisen
between us and our men, clergy and laity, rom the time o
the quarrel. lurthermore, we hae ully remitted to all, clergy
and laity, and as ar as pertains to us hae completely
orgien, all trespasses occasioned by the same quarrel
between Laster in the sixteenth year o our reign and the
restoration o peace. And, besides, we hae caused to be
made or them letters testimonial patent o the lord Stephen
archbishop o Canterbury, o the lord lenry archbishop o
)$*
Magna Carta J2JS
Dublin and o the aorementioned bishops and o master
Pandul about this security and the aorementioned
concessions.
63 \hereore we wish and irmly enjoin that the Lnglish
church shall be ree, and that the men in our kingdom
shall have and hold all the aforesaid liberties, rights and
concessions well and peacefully, freely and quietly,
fully and completely, for themselves and their heirs
from us and our heirs, in all matters and in all places for
ever, as is aforesaid. An oath, moreover, has been
taken, as well on our part as on the part of the barons,
that all these things aforesaid shall be observed in good
faith and without evil disposition. Witness the above-
mentioned and many others. Given by our hand in the
meadow which is called Runnymede between Windsor
and Staines on the fifteenth day of June, in the
seventeenth year of our reign.
)$)
Appendix D: Notice of Understanding and ntent
and Claim of Right
ou can make your own Law. Law that applies only to you. It is
,basically, an Aidait and an Oath combined. A Statement o
1ruth ... as you see it. Proided it is not objected to, in the
manner described in the Chapter on ôticivg, then it becomes \our 1ruth.
Y
Lven though you may be wrong. Remember: I you were wrong
then it should hae receied objections within the stated time period.
Quite obiously you cannot claim Rights that are otherwise unaailable
to you under Common Law. \ou cannot, or example, claim the Right to
breach the peace, murder someone, or deraud someone. loweer what
you can do is to state speciic instances o what you consider the 1ruth to
be ... in your speciic case.
\ou do this by stating what you understand the situation to be. \ou
then state, categorically, your intention to lie in peaceul co-existence
with eeryone else. \ou then make claims based on that.
\ou proide this Notice to whomsoeer you think needs to know. \ou
can use the maxim o: errice to Privciat i. cov.iaerea .errice to .gevt, ava
.errice to .gevt i. cov.iaerea .errice to Privciat. 1his means that, in any
organisation, one hand is responsible or telling the other hand what is
going on.
I now include ,below, my own, which was sent to the UK lome
Oice in March, 2009. I did not get any response, and thus receied no
objections in the time period.
O course, they were just ignoring me ... as i I didn't count. loweer
the test will come should anything untoward happen to me.
Lach clause is numbered. I did this in order to resole any objections
easily. I included a lee Schedule or any transgressions against me. I used
'terms o imprisonment', but could hae set 'monetary amounts'. 1he
terms o imprisonment can be anything I choose, and any monetary
amounts likewise. I did not set monetary amounts or the simple reason
that 'money' is an illusion.
1his was sent with an appropriate coering letter explaining the need to
create any necessary 'serices to Agents'. My NOUICOR ,as it is called or
short, is on the ollowing pages. It should be noted that I do not hae to
exercise all the Claims I hae made. 1hey can be let in abeyance or as
)$!
Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right
long as I determine the need to leae them unused. 1hese are My Claims.
My Rights. I can utilise them in whateer way I choose, and as I see it.
I, Veronica: o the Chapman amily, hereinater known as
Veronica: Chapman, a lesh and blood human being in possession
o a soereign and indiidual spirit, a liing soul, do hereby make
Oath and state the ollowing is My 1ruth and My Law:
|010| \hereas it is my understanding that in terms o earthly
existence there is no species more supreme than a liing, breathing,
imaginatie human being blessed with a liing soul, and
|020| \hereas it is my understanding that it is impossible to
distinguish one soul rom any other, and thereore all souls must at
all times and in all situations be considered equal in all respects in
any air, just and reasonable context, and
|030| \hereas it is my understanding that anything and eerything
must in practice derie rom the aoresaid axioms, and
|040| \hereas it is my understanding that any numerical grouping
o such souls can be reerred to as 'people', and
|050| \hereas it is my understanding that a society is, in essence,
nothing more than a grouping o like-minded souls since it is
deined as a number o people joined by mutual consent to
deliberate, determine and act or a common goal, and
|060| \hereas it is my understanding a statute is deined as a
legislated rule o a society, and
|00| \hereas it is my understanding a legislated rule o a society
can be gien the orce o law to act upon, or lawully bind, all
members o that society, and
|080| \hereas it is my understanding i a liing soul chooses by
ree will not to be a member o any society then statutes created by
said society do not bind that soul to said statute law, and
|090| \hereas it is my understanding a liing soul who chooses by
ree will not to be a member o any society can be reerred to as a
lreeman-on-the-land, and
|100| \hereas it is my understanding a lreeman-on-the-land
remains entirely and solely under Common Law jurisdiction, and
|110| \hereas I Veronica: Chapman am a lreeman-on-the-land,
and
)$"
|120| \hereas it is my understanding that all authority possessed by
elected representaties must inherently derie rom those who elect
said representation, and
|130| \hereas it is my understanding that i I hae the right to
empower representation by casting a ote then I am empowered to
represent mysel, and
|140| \hereas it is my understanding that the right o
empowerment does not derie rom any goernment otherwise it
would be possible or a goernment to reoke it, and
|150| \hereas it is my understanding that i the right to empower
representation were reoked then no representation would
thereater be possible, and
|160| \hereas it is my understanding the only orm o goernment
recognized as lawul in the United Kingdom is a representatie one,
and,
|10| \hereas it is my understanding representation requires
mutual consent, and
|180| \hereas it is my understanding that in the absence o mutual
consent neither representation nor goernance can exist, and
|190| \hereas it is my understanding the United Kingdom is a
Common Law jurisdiction enjoying the protection o Common
Law, and
|200| \hereas it is my understanding equality beore the law is
paramount and mandatory, and
|210| \hereas it is my understanding that or something to exist
legally it must hae a name, and
|220| \hereas it is my understanding that the UNI1LD
KINGDOM is in reality a corporation in Chapter 11 bankruptcy
and thus still allowed to trade, and
|230| \hereas it is my understanding that by irtue o my birth
within the boundaries o my Country Lngland I am a single share
owner in said UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION, and
|240| \hereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted
in scope and applicability by the British Constitution and Common
Law, and
|250| \hereas it is my understanding a statute being deined as a
legislated rule o a society is, within the United Kingdom, in act a
rule o said UNI1LD KINGDOM CORPORA1ION, and
)$#
|260| \hereas it is my understanding rules o a corporation are
limited in applicability to those who are agents o said corporation,
and
|20| \hereas it is my understanding those who hae a National
Insurance Number are in act employees o the goernment and
thus are bound by the statutes created by the said goernment, and
|280| \hereas it is my understanding that it is lawul to abandon
one`s National Insurance Number while at the same time not
aecting the right to any pension claim based on National
Insurance Contributions preiously paid, and
|290| \hereas it is my understanding people in the United
Kingdom hae a right to reoke or deny consent to be represented
and thus goerned, and
|300| \hereas it is my understanding i anyone does reoke or
deny consent they exist ree o goernment control and statutory
restraints, and
|310| \hereas it is my understanding that a claim o right
establishes a lawul excuse, and
|320| \hereas it is my understanding that i one has lawul excuse
one may choose to not obey a court, tribunal, statute, Act or order,
and
|330| \hereas a lreeman-on-the-Land has lawully reoked
consent and does exist ree o statutory restrictions, obligations,
and limitations, and
|340| \hereas it is my understanding that I, Veronica: Chapman as
a lreeman-on-the-Land, acting peaceully within community
standards, would not in that capacity breach the peace, and
|350| \hereas it is my understanding that all existing courts and
goernments are de acto only and not de jure, and
|360| \hereas it is my understanding that a woman acting as
Llizabeth Alexandra Mary \indsor did take the throne o Lngland
on the Second Day o June, Nineteen lundred and lity 1hree,
and
|30| \hereas it is my understanding that during a Coronation
ceremony said woman acting as Llizabeth Alexandra Mary \indsor
was asked by a man acting in the role o the then Archbishop o
Canterbury "\ill you solemnly promise and swear to goern the
Peoples o the United Kingdom o Great Britain and Northern
Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union o South
)$$
Arica, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and o your Possessions and the other
1erritories to any o them belonging or pertaining, according to
their respectie laws and customs" and she responded "I solemnly
promise so to do", and
|380| \hereas it is my understanding that this ceremony did install
said woman as Queen o Lngland and the United Kingdom, and
|390| \hereas it is my understanding that on or ater the
Seenteenth Day o October Nineteen lundred and Seenty 1wo
said woman did sign into statute an Act o Parliament known as the
Luropean Communities Act o Nineteen lundred and Seenty
1wo ,LCA192, which accepted without my consent a treaty
known as the 1reaty o Rome, and
|400| \hereas it is my understanding that the terms o the 1reaty
o Rome are counter in many respects to the respectie laws and
customs` o those nations o which said woman is Queen including
Lngland which is my Country o birth, and
|410| \hereas it is my understanding that anyone who participates
in allowing or by culpable neglect enabling my Country to be
goerned in any way by any oreign power is an act o treason as
deined by the British Constitution, and
|420| \hereas it is my understanding, thereore, that by signing o
the LCA192 as opposed to dissoling by Royal Prerogatie the
Parliament that created the treacherous Act was in itsel by
collusion an attempted act o treason against my Country, and
|430| \hereas it is my understanding that as a lreeman-on-the-
Land in this common law jurisdiction that I hae the duty to stand
in deence o the United Kingdom and its people against oreign
armed troops who attempt to inade, goern or police me or my
Country, and
|440| \hereas it is my understanding that this duty is not aected
by agreements made by treasonous and de acto goernment
agents, and
|450| \hereas it is my understanding that agreements made on
behal o the United Kingdom by traitors to the United Kingdom
do not bind the people o United Kingdom, and
|460| \hereas I do irmly and truly beliee the aorementioned
agreement is an oert act o treason, and
)$%
|40| \hereas I honourably reuse to be bound by agreements
made by traitors such as said Llizabeth Alexandra Mary \indsor in
collusion with the then Prime Minister Ldward leath, and
|480| \hereas it is my understanding that any peace oicer who
co-operates with oreign armed troops to goern or regulate the
population is also committing treason, and
|490| \hereas it is my understanding that historically the purpose
o a national armed orce was to ensure that oreign powers neer
inaded and goerned under a gun, and
|500| \hereas it is my understanding that the existence o armed
oreign troops patrolling and policing our streets would be
eidence o a war ought unsuccessully, and
|510| \hereas it is my understanding that agreeing or conspiring to
agree to allow armed oreign troops to patrol and police our streets
is an act o treason, and
|520| \hereas it is my understanding that any action or which one
can apply or and receie a licence must itsel be a undamentally
lawul action, and
|530| \hereas as I not a child and I am a lreeman-on-the-Land
who operates with ull responsibility and I do not see the need to
ask permission to engage in lawul and peaceul actiities, especially
rom those who claim limited liability, and
|540| \hereas it is my understanding that I hae a right to use my
property without haing to pay or the use or enjoyment o it, and
|550| \hereas it is my understanding that all public transportation'
is in act and actuality public property to which I hae the right o
use and access without haing to pay, and
|560| \hereas it is my understanding peace oicers hae a duty to
distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to
enorce statutes against a lreeman-on-the-Land are in act breaking
the law, and
|50| \hereas it is my understanding that I hae the power to
reuse intercourse or interaction with peace oicers who hae not
obsered me breach the peace, and
|580| \hereas it is my understanding that permanent estoppel by
acquiescence barring any peace oicer or prosecutor rom bringing
charges against a lreeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created i
this claim is not responded to in the stated ashion and time, and
)$&
|590| \hereas it is my understanding that the Common Law right
to trael on the highways without license proided one is not
engaging in commerce thereupon is lawul and still exists although
it does appear to hae been deceptiely hidden, and
|600| \hereas the Road 1raic Acts o the United Kingdom do
make it possible or peace oicers in the role o policy
enorcement oicers to stop an automobile in order to proide
serices and demand something o alue, and
|610| \hereas it is my understanding that i they are not proiding
a serice they hae no reason to stop any one and i proo o
registration, insurance and licence is not aluable they hae no need
to ask or it, and
|620| \hereas it is my understanding that I hae the right to reuse
to interact or co-operate with criminals, de acto goernment
agents or grossly negligent peace oicers, and
|630| \hereas it is my understanding that i I hae the power to
elect a representatie and empower them to appoint peace oicers
then I also hae the power to appoint directly, and
|640| \hereas it is my understanding that i I hae the power to
appoint directly or by proxy I must hae the power to ulil those
duties my sel, and
|650| \hereas it is my understanding that the United Kingdom
Police lorce although haing an illustrious history has had
members recently acting in a grossly criminal manner which does
tarnish the preious history and record, and
|660| \hereas it is my understanding that the Law proides remedy
at all times, een against rogue or negligent peace oicers and de
acto goernments apparently hijacked by soulless corporate
interests, and
|60| \hereas it is my understanding that in order to be a peace
maker and deal with rogue and possibly armed police oicers who
ail to act with respect to the code o Common Law I will need use
o and access to irearms o equal or greater power then those
people who act criminally hae access to, and
|680| \hereas it is my understanding that the act o registering the
birth o a baby creates a legal entity called a person that exists in
association with that baby and that the manner in which ospring
are registered transers superior guardianship rights oer that
ospring to the goernment, and
)$'
|690| \hereas it is my understanding that this creation o a person
and transer o authority is not ully disclosed to the parents and i
it was all good parents would reuse to register their ospring, and
|00| \hereas it is my understanding that the person and the
human being to which it is associated are two ery separate and
dierent things and that the people playing roles in goernment
only hae the right to act upon the person, and
|10| \hereas it is my understanding that i I do not exist in
association with a person I cannot be lawully goerned by the
people playing roles in goernment, and
|20| \hereas it is my understanding a by-law is deined as a rule
o a corporation, and
|30| \hereas it is my understanding corporations are legal ictions
and require contracts in order to claim authority or control oer
other parties, and
|40| \hereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an
initation to attend and those issued by the Ministry o Justice or
its ranchises which are de acto corporations create no obligation
or dishonour i ignored, and
|50| \hereas it is my understanding legal ictions lack a soul and
cannot exert any control oer those who are thus blessed and
operate with respect to that knowledge as only a ool would allow
soulless ictions to dictate one`s actions, and
|60| \hereas it is my understanding that the people in the
goernment are merely playing roles, and
|0| \hereas I AM NO1 PLA\ING, and
|80| \hereas it is my understanding that I am not obliged to obey
the orders o any one claiming to be a Queen or King or those
acting on behal o such an insane entity, as no one who does make
preposterous claims that abandon and erode the concept o
equality has any authority oer me, and
|90| \hereas it is my understanding that I can use a Notary Public
to perorm duties ound under any Act including thus they hae the
power to hold court and hear eidence and issue binding lawul
judgments, and
|800| \hereas it is my understanding that a Notary Public can also
be used to bring criminal charges to bear against traitors, een i
they hold the highest oice, and
)$(
|810| \hereas it is my understanding that there may be more o
this to ollow
|820| 1hereore be it now known to any and all interested,
concerned or aected parties, that I, Veronica: Chapman am a
lreeman-on-the-Land and do hereby sere notice and state clearly
speciically and unequiocally my intent to peaceully and lawully
exist ree o all statutory obligations, restrictions and that I maintain
all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter and exist without
deceptie goernance and to do so without limitations, restrictions
or regulations created by others and without my consent.
|830| Be it also now known to any and all interested, concerned or
aected parties, that I, Veronica: Chapman as a lreeman-on-the-
Land and do hereby sere notice and state clearly speciically and
unequiocally that I would neer conspire nor would I in any way
entreat others to disobey the Common Law o the Land which
ensures peaceul co-existence.
|840| lurthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my
communities` standards and will in act support said community in
our desire or truth and maximum reedom.
|850| lurthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and
urther claim that all property held by me is held under a claim o
right.
|860| lurthermore, I claim that anyone who intereres with my
lawul actiities ater haing been sered notice o this claim and
who ails to properly dispute or make lawul counterclaim is
breaking the law, cannot claim good aith or colour o right and
that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly conened
court de jure.
|80| lurthermore, I claim it is my right and solemn duty not only
to keep the peace My Sel but also to interene whereer may be
necessary to ensure that the peace is kept in a situation where peace
oicers are not present or are unwilling or whateer reason to
uphold their sworn and solemn duty so to do.
|880| lurthermore, I claim that the identity o My Sel is oreer
possible to establish correctly by my Presence as a liing, breathing,
luman Being with a soul together as may be necessary sworn
attestations rom riends, amily, and other associates. lurthermore
I claim that this supersedes any necessity to obtain or carry any
orm o external token such as an Identity Card or any lawul
purpose o establishing my true identity or the simple reason that
)%*
no such token can eer represent the soereign soul with which I
am blessed.
|890| lurthermore, I claim that the courts in 1he United Kingdom
are de-acto and bound by the Law and Lquity Acts and are in act
in the proitable business o conducting, witnessing and acilitating
the transactions o security interests and I urther claim they
require the consent o both parties prior to proiding any such
serices.
|900| lurthermore, I claim all transactions o security interests
require the consent o both parties and I do hereby deny consent to
any transaction o a security interest issuing under any Act or as
herein stated as a lreeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any
Act.
|910| lurthermore I claim ownership o my single share in the
corporation known as the UNI1LD KINGDOM and demand a
copy o said share such that I will become the shareholder and
thereby be in the position o exercising my own oting rights.
lurthermore I claim to receie the corresponding diidends or as
long as said UNI1LD KINGDOM operates under the illusion that
money has some alue` ,notwithstanding the act that money has
no alue` has been admitted by lM 1reasury. Lidence o this
admission can be supplied, and is anyway publicly aailable,.
|920| lurthermore I claim that my inalienable Natural Right to
1rial By Jury or any apparent transgressions on my part, including
an inalienable Natural Right o labeas Corpus, and these shall not
under any circumstances be inringed.
|930| lurthermore I claim the right to be entirely ree to determine
my own medication needs at all times and neer under any
circumstances be orced to ingest or otherwise receie into my
body by way o accination, electro-magnetic energy, audio or
isual energy or any other method any substance or alien energies I
do not consent to accept.
|940| lurthermore, I claim the right to conene a proper court de
jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions o any
peace oicers, goernment principals or agents or justice system
participants who haing been sered notice o this claim ail to
dispute or discuss or make lawul counterclaim and then interere
by act or omission with the lawul exercise o properly claimed and
established rights and reedoms.
)%)
|950| lurthermore, I claim the right to ulil my duty to shoot any
oreign troops in the United Kingdom who are armed and
attempting to police or goern me or my ellow countrymen
without consent and to iew them as an inading orce which must
be lawully attacked. And I urther claim to right to nominate as
many deputies as may be necessary who by their own ree will and
consent are prepared to assist me in ulilment o this duty to my
Country.
|960| lurthermore, I claim the law o agent and principal applies
and that serice upon one is serice upon both.
|90| lurthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims
or disputes publicly and in an open orum using discussion and
negotiation and to capture on ideo tape said discussion and
negotiation or whateer lawul purpose as I see it.
|980| lurthermore, I claim my SClLDULL or any transgressions
by peace oicers, goernment principals or agents or justice system
participants or agents o the medical proession or any other parties
who trespass upon and thus unlawully hinder My Peaceul Sel,
Veronica: o the Chapman amily, as deined in attached Schedule
A.
|990| lurthermore I claim the right to use a Notary Public to
conduct due process o the aorementioned SClLDULL against
any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my
interests, directly or by proxy in any way.
Aected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make
their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within
lOUR1LLN ,14, days o serice o notice o this action.
Responses must be under Oath or Attestation, upon ull
commercial liability and penalty o perjury and registered at the
Place o Claim o Right proided no later than ourteen days rom
the date o original serice as attested to by way o certiicate o
serice. Schedule B is aailable or the resolution o any objections.
lailure to register a dispute against the claims made herein and then
successully deeating these claims in a proper court o law will
result in an automatic deault judgment securing oreermore all
rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irreocable
estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing o charges under any
statute or Act or regulation against My Sel lreeman-on-the-Land
Veronica: Chapman or exercising these lawul and properly
established rights, reedoms and duties.
)%!
Place o Claim o Right: _________________________________
Dated: __________________________________
Claimant: Veronica: o the Chapman amily
____________________________
____________________________________________________
Independent \itness 1: ____________________________
Address: _________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Address: _________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
_________________________________________
)%"
Schedule A
Penalty term o imprisonment to apply to each and eery indiidual
reasonably inoled in the transgression, including all senior
oicers or line managers as accomplices in law.
1ransgression
Penalty 1erm o
Imprisonment
My Sel being questioned,
interrogated or in any way
detained, harassed or otherwise
regulated
1 year
My Sel handcued, transported,
incarcerated or subjected to any
adjudication process that is
outside Common Law
jurisdiction
2 years
My Sel orced to suer the
eects o what has come to be
known as a non-lethal or less-
than-lethal weapon such as a
1aser
5 years
My Sel orced to undergo any
ingestion o energies or
substances orced onto or into
my body, whether under to guise
o medication or not, without my
expressly notarised consent
10 years
My Sel being attributed anything
I did not actually speak or write
in the eent that my written or
spoken communications are
shown to be tampered with
5 years.
)%#
Schedule B
Objections and Resolutions.
)%$
Schedule C
Supportie Understandings.
)%%
Schedule D
Additional Claims.
)%&
)%'

Freedom Veronica Chapman

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Freedom Veronica Chapman

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Ireedom

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi