QMIS LBE Rev Mech Part 2

S#
Date
Location
Surveillance Description
Category
SATIP
SAIC
Discipline
Standard Category
Standard
Para
Standard2
Para2
Standard3
1761
4/6/2008 1:51:24 PM
rebar was tacked to spools # SP-01 & SP-02 BB-367139 which violated SAES-W-011 all tack rebar shall be removed and NDT is requiered. visual inspection must be done when these spools arraived to site. Contractor has commenced welding activities of structural attachments at Pump Station 10 without approved QC welding Inspector on site, or RFI to inform PID of the activity. There is no documented evidence of the correct WPS being used or any pre or in process inspection being conducted. This violates Schedule Q, and Saudi Aramco Typical Inspection Plans which show the hold and witness points for Contractor QC Inspectoprs. During The routine site visite PID found the Paint sotre is not matching S.Aramco reqirments at SAES-H-100: 1-Paints and thinners are stored in well-ventilated buildings at the recommended storage temperatures given in Saudi Aramco Paint data sheet, SAES-H101V. Note: Shelter storage temperature is normally @ 35C maximum unless stated otherwise in the Paint Data Sheet. 2Temperature sensitive and self polymerization Paints materials are stored in air conditioned storage area at the temperature recommended in the Saudi Aramco Paint data sheet SAES-H-101V. 3Temporary storage of paint materials covered with canvas, tarpaulins has not exceeded the specified 14 days period. It has been obseved that the revised Quality Plan was not yet submitted to inspection since the provisional approval of the Contractors Quality Plan. It must be clearly understood that full approval of Quality Plan should be secured upon commmencement of all activities. Inspection is urging the contractor to respond all the comments in the Final Review of the Quality Plan and submit corresponding revised copy.
Violation-After The Fact
SATIP-W-01101
SAIC-W-2005
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-011
9.5
1762
3/20/2008 11:35:20 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.1
1763
5/11/2008 4:45:37 PM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2025
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-100
6.1
1764
12/30/2007 1:34:09 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
3.2
1765
9/4/2007 11:18:23 AM
HB-111-16-6001
Imad QC manager Mr. Joey V has left the projerct for an emergency leave and Imad faild to have a qualified replacment for him.The project is runing without Qc manager which will affect the overeall project Quality and also this is a violation to Sch"Q" Table VI-2. PLEASE advice the contractor to have a replacment immediatly otherwise APIU will elevate this logbook to an NCR level. Visual Inspection has been done for structural that have been galvanized and it has been noticed that. The structural coating (galvanized) has (dull grey coating) which is acceptable accordance to ASTM A 123 .but it has been noticed that there are some defects due to handling and storage. Contractor has to prepare procedure for handling and repairing the defects. APIU have noted that the QC manager Mr Roberto R. Miranda did not return of his emegency leave on 07/17/08 as specified in IMADs letter to SAPMT. This is in violation of Schedule Q. Please have the contractor correct this violation urgently either by specifying the actual return date to site or a replacement QC manager. APIU have noted that the contractors (IMAD) QC supervisor Mr A Khan. Jadoon has departed the project several days ago without any formal notification to the Company representative. This is in violation of Schedule "Q" Q-7 para 5.11 The contractor must submit a replacement. After many requests for IMAD to mobilize their welding inspector to site in accordance with Schedule Q they have failed to comply. This is in violation of Schedule Q Para 5.10, Q7 & Table VI-2 Construction Phase Quality Personnel Requirements. IMAD have failed to mobilize their QA Manager to date with the procument phase at 78.44% completed. This is totally unacceptable and is in violation of Schedule "Q" Q-5 para 5.1. IMAD must source a QA manager imediately, have him approved by PID & mobilize to site.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.13
1766
4/13/2008 3:36:15 PM
SATIP-M-00101
SAIC-M-2005
Mechanical
SAMSS
12-SAMSS-007
6.3.2.2
1767
7/22/2008 1:36:37 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.11
1768
8/12/2008 2:26:03 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.11
1769
1/28/2009 11:26:04 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.1
1770
8/8/2007 7:42:25 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.1
1771
8/8/2007 7:47:29 AM
IMAD have failed to mobilize their internal auditor to site to complete the 15% internal construction audit. Construction progress is now running at 28.26%. This is unacceptable and is in violation of Schedule "Q" Q-8 para 7.2.3. It has been noted that the contractor IMAD has let his approved Mech inspector (Sharif Ansari) go out on vacation schedule without notification or submitted a replacement. This is in violation of Schedule Q para 5.11 Q-7. The contractor has repeated this violation in the past and continues to ignore the requirements of Schedule Q. Continuation of this practice by the contractor APIU will issue an immediate woorksheet. SAPMT please ensure the contractor is aware of this serious violation and to take immediate corrective action. Found, two weld+ end couplings tie-in joints employed by the Contractor on New MLV installation at QA10-Km65 (2 couplings) and at UA4-Km 99.7 (1 coupling) pipeline sections. These were violation against specified drawings (HB265908-001-00 Tie-In Joints #271901 and HA-266001-00 Tie-In Joint #282-216) which shall be Butt Welds. During Aramco Audit in GCC-BI 03096 project, Ain Nahkil pre fab yard, auditor found that Drawing # HB 265942, Spool # A, I -SW 29 & SW 57 has no daily welding report and visual inspection report. RFI has not been issued for welding inspection to PID.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
7.3.2
1772
12/2/2008 2:21:28 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.11
1773
12/21/2009 5:25:39 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
Drg # HB-265908001-00 & HA266001-00
1774
11/27/2008 7:12:25 AM
SATIP-W-01101
SAIC-W-2007
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-011
11
Schedule Q
1.7
1775
3/6/2009 8:23:39 AM
CONTRACTOR (MSC)IS BEING ADVICED TO clear all out standing repair or reshoot for the radio graphed joints prior to the hydro test, PID has noted that the following joints needs reshoot as per your rtfi and aramco assessment report 1-FW1-23 2-FWI-17 3-FWi-07 4-FW1-39 5-FW1-13(16 LATERAL) MSC QUALITY ORGANIZATION AGAIN BEING REMINDED OF THIER LAPSES IN REPROTING PROPERLY,PID NEEDS ALL HYDROTEST PACKAGES TO BE THOROUGHLY REVIEWED AND ALL REQUAIREMENTS SHALL BE MET AS PER ARAMCO STANDARDS AND CHECK LIST PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION TO PID AND ALL CONSTRUCTABILITY SHALL BE CLEARD BY THE PMT FOR ANY DISCRIPENCY AND SHORT COMINGS ETC. contractor dont have any air reciever to provide the req pressure of minimum 90 psig@the nozzel(for surface blasting) for the air coming via compressor to staisfy the req of SAES-H-100, ARTICLE 5.4.2 IT HAS BEEN OBSERVED THAT THE ABOVE SUBJECT VALVE IS NOT PROPERLY CENTERE TO THE VALVE SUPPORT # 400,CONTRATOR HAS BEEN ADVICE TO CORRECT THIS BY ISSUE A FIELD CHANGE NOTICE FOR THE EXTRA SUPPORT THROUGH PMT AND REFLECT THE CHANGE TO THE AS BUILT DRWAING it has been observed that MSC onsite mechanical inspector Mr tahseen jaffar is offsite( because of his mother illness etc) since more than one week and msc is failed to provide the replacement and further failed to reflect the transation in to the vacation scheduale or organization chart even after repeated reminders by sapid/plpiu ,it is violation of the agreed contratc and will result in the issuance of the possible NCR.
Violation-Prevented Installation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A VI Para 3 (U)
1776
2/20/2008 5:44:41 PM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2026
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-100
5.4.2
1777
4/22/2008 4:07:22 PM
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2043
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-J-700
9.2.2
1778
4/22/2008 10:52:59 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.11
1779
4/14/2008 8:14:19 AM
1780
5/28/2008 7:42:44 AM
1781
2/25/2008 2:21:30 PM
The contractor MSC was ongoing joint welding of 38" dia. main pipeline without 100% monitor by QC Welding Inspector, as per Contractor Schedule Q, paragraph 5.6, Contractor Quality personnel should be dedicate to the work and should no other function on this contract. Ongoing Welding on 38"X0.375 by Automatic Welding process @ mainline P/L. @ Km.132+500 with un-attended Welding QC @ site for production joint welds, this is a violation of Shedule Q, paragraph 5.1 pid has oobserved that the contrator is using APCS-113-A COATING SYSTEM FOR THE COATING REPAIR OF THE ALL FIELD GIRTH WELDS WITHOUT ANY EXCEPTION IN VIOLATION OF SAES-H-002WHER AS THE STANDARD requires APCS104 or APCS-113C on external girth welds of new pipelines. contrator is carraying out the high pressure hydro testing of the valve@ thier khurais yard where as no document has been submitted to PID( so as to make sure that the test blind are safe and test worthy) REGARDING THE PROVE OF THE ASME certification of the test blinds and NDE of the inlet nipple/bossess welde to the blind,CONTRACTOR IS CONTINUE WITH THIS ACTVITY AT HIS OWN INSPITE OF THE REPEATED INSTRUCTION OF PID TO AVOID THIS UNSAFE PRACTICE,PID IS NOT WITNESSING ANY TEST. During Welding activities for 16" pipeline @ KM 15, it has been found that the contractor is using some equipments without a valid calibration certificate (e,g: Digital thermometer). This is violation to Saudi Aramco Standard. The contractor was asked to send any equipment to an approved third party company for calibration.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.6
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
5.1
SATIP-H-00206
SAIC-H-2049
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-002
5.4.2
1782
3/1/2008 7:47:11 AM
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2042
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-108
4.7.5
1783
1/18/2010 12:22:39 PM
Standards Violation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 7.1
1784
3/14/2010 3:14:26 PM
During surveillance inspection for coating activities for 16 pipeline at Km 6, it has been found that the testing equipment used for measuring the dew point and relative humidity is not working properly and does not give an accurate reading. This violates Saudi Aramco Checklist SAIC-H-2081 Section C & Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-H-002V Para 6. The contractor was asked to stop the coating activities until they provide accurate and calibrated equipment During surveillance inspection for pipeline stringing and laying for 16 pipeline at Km 13-16, it has been found that during lowering the pipeline inside the trench, the pipe has unsupported length of more than 3 meter. This violates Saudi Aramco Checklist SAIC-L-2132 Section A20 & Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-L-450 Para 14.5. The contractor was asked to correct this issue before continuing this activity During surveillance inspection for bending activities for 16 pipeline at the contractor fabrication yard, it has been found that the contractor is performing some bending activities without informing ARAMCO PID by RFI notification and without an inspection coverage by the contractor mechanical QC. This violates the inspection requirements as per SAEP-1150 and schedule Q (Inspection coverage in projects During surveillance inspection for coating activities for 16 pipeline at Km 6, it has been found that there is a 24 meter coated pipe has a physical damage for around 1 meter on the pipe surface. The damage is near joint No.: AP-34-W-050-51-02. This violates Saudi Aramco Checklist SAIC-L-2112 Section C10. The physical damage needs to be investigated to see if the pipe material is affected or not
Standards Violation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 7.1
1785
3/15/2010 10:51:11 AM
Standards Violation
SATIP-L-45004
SAIC-L-2132
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-450
14.5
1786
2/7/2010 3:56:24 PM
Standards Violation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.7 and 5.1
1787
3/14/2010 2:53:51 PM
Standards Violation
SATIP-L-45004
SAIC-L-2112
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-200
5.1.1
1788
1/18/2010 4:05:14 PM
During Surveillance inspection for the 16" pipeline material @ Km 9, it has been found that some 16" pipes are touching the ground and there are no sufficient protection. This is violation to Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-H-200 Para 5.2.1 and SAES-L 450 Para 14.10.4. The contractor was asked to elevate the pipes from the ground at least 150 mm During surveillance inspection for 16 pipeline @ Km 5, it has been found the contractor welding QC does not have Temperatureindicating crayons, thermocouples, or contact pyrometers Which must be used to measure the preheat and interpass temperatures. This violates Saudi Aramco standard SAES-W-12 Para 11.3. The contractor was asked to stop welding activities at that area until they provide one During surveillance inspection for welding activities for 16 Pipeline @ Km 12, it has been found that the contractor starts welding a Transition Joint No. AP-38-W-34-SI01 between ends of unequal thickness of 16" Pipeline which require special fit-up preparation as per Saudi Aramco Checklist SAIC-W2048 Attachment 2 without informing the welding QC and Saudi Aramco PID. This violate Saudi Aramco Schedule Q requirements and Saudi Aramco Checklist SAIC-W2048. The contractor was asked to cut Joint No. AP-38-W-34-SI-01 and re-weld it in present of the welding QC and Saudi Aramco PID During welding activities for 16" pipeline @ Km 14-15, it has been found that the contractor failed to use wind shields or tents during welding with strong wind. This is violation to Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-W-12 Paragraph 10.2. The contractor was asked to put the tents in these weather conditions.
Standards Violation
SATIP-L-45004
SAIC-L-2132
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-450
14.10.4
SAES-H-200
5.2.1
1789
2/22/2010 11:10:00 AM
Standards Violation
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
11.3
1790
2/27/2010 8:19:49 AM
Standards Violation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.7 and 5.1
1791
1/18/2010 9:07:03 AM
Standards Violation
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
10.2
1792
1/20/2010 2:19:26 PM
During surveillance Inspection on welding activities for 16" Pipeline @ Km 14-15, it has been found that the contractor is using External clamp on welding 16 pipeline. As per Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-W12 Paragraph 10.4, this is a violation except for Tie-In welds and Cement line pipe. For other conditions there must be an approval from Aramco CSD Welding Engineer and 100% radiography is performed to the production welds. The contractor was asked to remove the External clamp after the hot pass and start using Internal Clamp for the next joints. 100% NDT will be performed to the Joint No. AP-W-25. And if there is any defect in that joint, it shall be cut and re-weld again During surveillance inspection for welding activities for 16 pipeline @ Km 6-9, it has been found that there is no sand control in the right of way and the soft marl sand will affect the quality of welding and will increase the welding rejection rate. The tent shield is not enough to protect the welding. Reference Standard SAESW-12 Paragraph 10.2 During welding activities of the 16" pipeline @ KM 14 to KM 15, it has been found that the contractor moved the sideboom that was supporting the partially welded joint. This caused the pipe to move before completing the joint. This is violation to Saudi Aramco Standard SAES-W12 Para 10.7 which states that the pipe shall not be lifted or moved during welding. During surveillance inspection for welding activities for 16 Pipeline @ Km 5, it has been found that the contractor cut a completed weld joint no. AP-31-W02-SI-02 without informing the Saudi Aramco PID due to a stuck internal clamp inside the pipe. This violate Saudi Aramco Schedule Q requirements
Standards Violation
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
10.4
1793
2/9/2010 11:53:29 AM
Standards Violation
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
10.2
1794
1/9/2010 3:41:26 PM
Standards Violation
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
10.7
1795
2/21/2010 1:55:21 PM
Standards Violation
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.7
1796
3/2/2010 1:54:20 PM
1) As a minimum, full quality system audits shall be carried out at fifteen percent (15%) of completion stage for the Construction WORK Phase. Construction Progress Completion is now 26.57%. 2) Audit notifications and agenda shall be submitted to the Company Representative fourteen (14) calendar days in advance. 3) Quality System Auditors: CV shall be submitted to PID for review and approval, as per Sch. Q-Att. 1, Para. 1.2. Welding inspectors Should have and use all the required Tools For Checking the Welding Fit-up (highlow gage, bevel gage, digital contact pyrometer) Reference to isometric piping detail drawing # RD-582977 SHT 001 . 12"R84-P-9535-75-3CS9P1 . a turbulence free minimum distance of 12" checkvalve downstream less than 2 pipe diameter.violate SAES L108Para 6.3.4 For all sizes NPS 4 inch and above, a turbulence-free minimum distance of 5 pipe diameters upstream and 2 pipe diameters downstream of every check valve shall be maintained. No pipe fittings such as elbows, reducers, tees, etc., or flow restricting devices such as orifices, control valves, etc., shall be installed in these zones. contractor shall provide corrective action before fabrication. During document (isometric) reviewing 8 line R 84-P-9173 drawing # RD-583349 SHT 002-013 we found there is no vent at high point for hydro test activities this is violate SAES A-004 Para 7.4.1 vent shall be provided at all high point . On routine inspection, N18A nozzle WNRF flange 20" X 150# (downcomer) of the storage vessel was noted with scratch radially across the raised face, about 1mm wide x 40mm long and went deeper than the serration. As per ASME B16.5 Table F3 and MSS SP-44 Table 11, permissible facing imperfections for this flange NPS is allowed up to 0.25" or 6mm radial projection only. Contractor is advised to resolve above prior to final installation.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
7.3.2
Schedule Q
A I Para 1.2
1797
7/12/2006 10:55:05 AM
N/A
SATIP-W-01101
SAIC-W-2006
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-011
12.4
Schedule Q
A IV Para 7.1
1798
7/11/2006 9:53:00 AM
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2043
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-108
6.3.4
1799
7/6/2006 11:52:39 AM
SATIP-A-00402
SAIC-A-2010
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-A-004
8.4.1
1800
7/8/2007 8:19:55 AM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2002
Mechanical
international Standard
ASME B16.5
Table F3
1801
3/3/2008 1:47:15 AM
1802
3/3/2008 1:35:03 AM
1803
7/14/2007 7:58:19 AM
1804
3/19/2008 2:58:59 PM
On external inspection of R81-D103D, it was found that : 1]the nameplate for both the deaerator (heater) and storage tank have the same equipment no. R81-D0103D, in non conformance to ASME BPVC VIII Div. 1 Ed. 2004 par. UG116(j) and 32-SAMSS-004 par. 17.1. 2]the Dwg. CAD-1659-01 sht. 8 Rev. 7 indicates initial test pressure of 1082 Kpa & periodic test of 923 Kpa for the deaerator (heater) while the actual nameplate indicates 1031 and 924 Kpa respectively in non conformance to ASME BPVC VIII Div. 1 ed. 2004 par. UG-119(d) and UG-90(b)(17). Contractor to provide corrective action. On internal inspection of R81-D103D, it was found that the internal tray enclosure assemblys 5 support channels were welded to the structural support against manufacturer Sterling Deaerator Co. Dwg. # D-5824-2 requirement that specify welding both ends of center channel only, in non conformance to Contract Sched. B par. 1.4 & 3.7 . Contractor to provide corrective action. Noted Nozzle N10C - 2" x 150# (level instrument service) next to sliding saddle has its flange in contact with the structural support, offering no gap allowance to compensate for vessel expansion. Contractor should take appropriate corrective action before vessel is put During our surveillance at Utility R81E-158 after cooler area we found outlet line of PZV#116 ( 3 RL10667-1CS9P ) without Drain valves violating SAES J-600 Para.9.7.6 (d). Please provide us corrective action
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2002
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
17.1
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
SATIP-J-60001
SAIC-J-2009
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-J-600
9.7.5
1805
4/12/2008 4:40:34 PM
During surveillance at Caustic drum D-130 it was observed that the following things 1) Line 2 C-103601CA9C4, RB-598040-001-00 Normal carbon steel pipes and fittings, valve were used for this line .It is violating against the piping line class 1CA9C4 and Piping specification RE-585599 sheet 09 of 99. It is required the Impact tested carbon steel materials. 2) Also found that there is conflicts in materials specification used for the level indicators LG-651to 654 and the stand pipe connection. Ref. RB-597955-002003. Materials used for the stand pipe connection is low temperature materials but connecting the level gages fitting and valves are normal carbon steel materials. Please provide us the corrective action. While doing surveillance at utility area it was noticed that the line 24DFW-10405-1CS9P ,Drawing # R81L-RB-597987-002-0A3 Girth weld SW29 was covered by the saddle support reinforcement pad refer Support # PSW12 and it was welded with the A234 Gr WPB 90 degree elbow fitting which is violating our standard SAES-L-350 Para 10.6 .requirements. Its states that the Branch connections and their reinforcement shall not cover the girth welds. Please provide us corrective action. During our surveillance at utlity area and found the Stainless Steel thermowells eg(TW468,469,470,471,475,and TGs,etc) installed at all the equipments and piping without isolation kids violating SAES L-109 Para.11.5 (SAIC-L-2020 item # A9 ),please provide us corrective action.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
SAES-L-105
Piping Line Class 1CA9C4
Project Piping Specification
1806
3/20/2008 9:10:26 AM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2018
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-350
10.6
1807
3/19/2008 3:06:54 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2020
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-109
12
1808
3/3/2008 1:09:16 PM
During site surveillance at utility site it was noticed that the line 16-CWS10388-12CGOU ,RB-597971-001-003 and completed welds FW24,FW29 were modified without Engineering approved instructions and notification to Quality control Department. It is violating with the approved Project Method statement MS-D-044, Para 4.1,SATIP-W011,item 3.17 and SAEA-W-011. From the above results the following activities are not performed. 1) Nonperformance of fit up inspection 2) No verification of welding procedure and welder qualifications 3) No verification of materials traceability esp. on addition of pup pieces 4) Non-performance of the required NDT. During site surveillance at utility site it was noticed that the line 8-CWS10390-12CGOU ,RB-597973-001-00 and completed weld SW19 was modified without Engineering approved instructions and notification to Quality control Department. It is violating with the approved Project Method statement MS-D-044, Para 4.1,SATIP-W011,item 3.17 and SAEA-W-011. From the above results the following activities are not performed. 1) Nonperformance of fit up inspection 2) No verification of welding procedure and welder qualifications 3) No verification of materials traceability esp. on addition of pup pieces 4) Non-performance of the required NDT. It is repeated voilation .please refer ARAMCO NCR#B1-3193 NCR018.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3 & 1.7
1809
3/25/2008 7:45:53 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3 & 1.7
1810
7/23/2008 11:23:05 AM
During test package walk through at feed and surge area, it was observed that the test pack R83-F91262 found water droplets from the stainless steel line drain point. After our verification of this line package,it was hydro tested on 29-06-08 and layup not yet completed.It may cause for internal pitting corrosion and Microbiological induced corrosion. It is violating Saudi Aramco standard SAES-A-007 Para 6.3 and 7.5.1 which states that the maximum hydrostatic water contact time is maximum 4 days. It is advice the contractor to investigate the line condition and provide us the corrective action. On surveillance inspection, heavily pitted 42 in. dia. pipe is used for the pump casings of subject pumps now for installation at the location. Drawing specifies for 42 in. casing pipe with Sch-XS (1/2 in wall thk) and 1/4 in. deep pits were found on it. This is in violation of Sched. Q para. 7 related to non conformance on drawing requirements. Also requirements for materials to be free from defects under SAIC L 2005 and SAIC L 2006. Besides the reported severe pitting corrosion (QMIS Item#4730) on the subject pump casing, the delivered pipes to the site noticed with the following non-conformities: As per the IFC design drawing R83-0-RA370847.001.00A, the required material of the casing pipes is CS 42/40 DIA. with SCH-XS thickness which is 0.500. In addition, the welded reducer plate should be made from 0.500 plate. However, the delivered pipes actual thickness is lower than STD schedule of having an average thickness of 0.320 which was measured using UT measurement. On the other hand, the welded reducer plate actual measured thickness was found about 0.300. Summing up, these casings were found with the following non-conformities: 1.Severe pitting corrosion covering about 25% of the external surface. 2.The sub standard wall thickness versus the design drawing RA-
SATIP-A-00402
SAIC-A-2018
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-A-007
6.3 & 7.5.1
1811
3/31/2007 10:08:19 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1812
4/3/2007 7:35:38 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1813
3/23/2008 2:58:24 PM
While doing our surveillance at utility and 200 feet pipe way the following things are notified 1) Drawing # RB-598021 -001-0C1 the trunion was welded with welding sleeve also the welding was covered by the trunion support joint welding which is violating SAES-L-350 Para 10.6 and SAES-L-150 Para7.3 . 2) Drawing #RB-520853 -001 and RB520848-004-0B1 the spacers and blinds were installed with out any productive coating which is in direct contact with sea water. Please clarify the requirements with engineering and provide us the corrective action. During our site surveillance at 100 feet area,the line RB-620741-sheet 001 rev-01, 2 BD-10193-1SDOP the following points were observed 1)Dead legs found the FW7& 8 joints 2)Between the joints FW4&6 line was permanently deformed also this line found rusted condition due to improper handling and installation.It is violating the SAES-L-350 Para 8.1 which states that all materials shall be handled with care during fabrication and installation to prevent damage. It is advice the contractor to replace the damaged piping spools. During site surveillance it was noticed that the following lines 20600S-10462-6CS9P and 20-600S10463-6CS9P the end of installed insulation with cladding were note protected from rain, other form of atmospheric conditions,(fog, Humidity,Chemicals,Corrosive dust and sand). It is violating as per SAES-N-001 para1.2, INSH200, section 4.1 and 5.10, which states that the Installed insulation has the required permanent protection or temporary protection applied before the conclusion of that days work. Protection is planned ahead. (INSH2000, Section 5.10) and SAESN-001, Section 1.2, INSH2000, para 4.1 states that Installed insulation is protected from the elements (rain, other moisture, chemicals, corrosive dust, sand, etc
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2018
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-350
10.6
SAES-L-150
7.3
1814
12/30/2007 1:06:17 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
11.4
1815
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-350
8.1
1816
8/13/2007 5:20:42 PM
SATIP-N-00102
SAIC-N-2015
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-N-001
1.2
1817
1/13/2008 10:12:07 AM
From the recent inclement weather conditions, it is reminded that additional pre-heating equipments are needed for removing the moisture and preheating the joints that are normally not heated in summer, also adequate (wet) weather protection is required for the joints to be welded especially for heavy wall welds that take 12 to 24 hours to complete. Also noted that the end of installed insulation with cladding are not covered with polyethylene sheet which results all insulation materials are in wet condition at off site area which is violation of SAIC N-2014. It is advice the contractor to replace the wet condition insulation materials and to prevent the part of the insulation which was not covered by cladding until the insulation completed for the rest part of the pipe. Such earlier anticipation would eliminate delays in work that would significantly save cost and time. On an inspection round around at C2+ 100 south pipeway area, 4:30 p.m. 01Mar2008, it was found that Line-8-10323-3CS9P, Dwg. RB520826-002-00, Spl-P6-0826-02D, weld jt. # FW22 was found left unfinished with its root pass in about near half of the total weld length (pipe circumference). This is in violation of SAES-W-012 par. 10.7.2 that says The second or hot pass shall be added as soon as possible after the completion of the root pass, but shall not exceed 5 minutes for vertical down welding with cellulosic electrodes or 15 minutes for vertical up welding. If a production joint exceeds the specified time lapse, then magnetic particle examination of the root pass shall be conducted and the joint preheated to 60C minimum or the preheat specified in the procedure, whichever is greater, prior to making the hot pass. Contractor to please provide corrective action, and steps
SATIP-W-01101
SAIC-W-2005
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-011
12
1818
SATIP-N-00102
SAIC-N-2014
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-N-001
Section 3
1819
3/2/2008 1:31:01 PM
SATIP-W-01201
SAIC-W-2048
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-012
10.7.2
1820
3/2/2008 2:00:46 PM
1821
3/12/2008 9:06:01 AM
1822
3/13/2008 11:31:39 AM
On an inspection round around at C2+ 100 south pipeway area, 4:30 p.m. 01Mar2008, it was found that Line-8-10323-3CS9P, Dwg. RB520826-002-00, Spl-P6-0826-02D, FW22 has been inserted with an 8" pup piece that has no heat # or ID for traceabiliy in non conformance to Sched. Q Att. IV par. 3.2 and 3.3 . Contractor to provide corrective action. PZV# R84-42-200A (bellow type) was installed in the place of the PZV# R84-44-409A (Conv. type) During a walkthrough for punch listing the test package TP-R84-A40361 line number 8-R84-P-9328-153CS1P3 and drawing number RD583597 we found the following violations: 1) drains were found very close to structure support. 2) Missing bracing on drains. 3) Misalignment was noticed on flange joints. Violation Prevented Installation On routine inspection of R84-C-0471 A, with internals installation works ongoing for catalyst support grid, it was noted support grid panels (1G, 1E, 1C) with wire screen (3 x 3 mesh-2.2 mm wire dia) slotted holes (22 x 40 mm) are mismatched/offset with vessel support rings holes (22 mm). Grid panels cannot thence be fixed/attached to vessel support rings with its M20 x 110 bolt. The support ring holes need to be redrilled to align it with the grid panels slotted holes. Contractor need to submit proposal/method statement on remedial measures to be considered before taking further actions. Reference is Costacurta Drawing No. B.M6.723. Note that vessel has already been PWHTd, hot works need to be verified/confirmed first if applicable if being opted.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
Attachment IV para 3.3
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1823
4/9/2007 1:00:24 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1824
11/29/2007 6:03:38 AM
(1)Pressure Relief Valves were already installed at N8, N9, and N10 without supports in violation of API RP 520 part II par. 4.3.1 Pressure relief devices should be isolated from piping stresses through proper support, anchoring or flexibility of the discharge piping (see fig. 1 typical PRV installation with vent pipe with atmospheric discharge and fig. 7-typical PRV installation with vent pipe). (2)Also violates par. 12.3 Valves should be tested before installation to confirm the set pressure. Contractor advised to remove the PRV for testing before installation and install proper supports. Internal inspection of R84-D-0467 revealed following: 1]The Anthracite Coal Baffle has its welded grating 44x5mm plate item 138/138b tack welds with the 19x5mm banding bar item 88/88b not uniformly spaced and staggered, and there are areas not welded. Vendor Schwartz Hautmont Dwg. 747a06-203 Rev. 9 do not provide the detail on the spacing and location of the welds, hence, clarification is needed. 2]Some welds were found unfused and incomplete, needs to be rewelded. 3]The stack connection F in Dwg. 747a06-200 Rev. 12 is now bolted with carbon steel bolts, need to be replaced with stud bolt item 25 and nut item 26 as per Dwg. 747a06-201 Rev. 6. These are both UNS 31254 as per Dwg. 747a06-204 Materials List. 4]Stack connection F is with dissimilar metals joint (carbon steel flange to SS flange and bolt), isolation kits should be provided as per SAES-L-109 par. 11.5. Above items are for action by Contractor. On internal inspection, it was noted that tack welds for the 44x5mm plate item 138/138b to 19x5mm banding bar item 88/88b were staggered, not uniform in spacing. Vendor Schwartz Hautmont Dwg. 747a06-203 do not clearly specify this detail. Also, some welds were poorly done. Vendor to please clarify and offer corrective action.
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2008
Mechanical
API PR 520 part II
4.3.1
1825
3/26/2008 7:10:54 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1826
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2014
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-109
12.6
1827
3/23/2008 6:37:59 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1828
3/10/2008 5:49:35 PM
On external inspection of R81-D103D, it was found that : 1]the nameplate for both the deaerator heater and water storage tank have the same equipment no. R81-D0103D, in non conformance to ASME BPVC VIII Div. 1 Ed. 2004 par. UG116(j) and 32-SAMSS-004 par. 17.1. 2] Mismatched information between Dwg. No. CAD-1659-01 Sht. 8 Rev. 7 and actual client nameplate for detail for deaerator heater that indicate 1082 Kpa for initial test while actual vessel nameplate indicate 1031 Kpa., 13211 kg. for empty weight while actual is 9995 kg., and 25.8 m for capacity while actual is 25.05 m in non conformance to ASME BPVC VIII Div. 1 ed. 2004 par. UG-119(d) and UG-90(b)(17). This referenced to closed surv. # 13946 to correct the informations therein. 1) Noted demister pads were loose and not fitted tightly in nozzle N2 of the vessel, not in accordance to the General Note # 36 of the IFC Drwg. # J-Y2K5-216-091 Demister Pad will be oversized suitably for tight fit in the vessel, for clarification/verification with engineering and vendor. 2) Internal coating at about 3 x 0.4 mtrs area from bottom head tangency line upwards, oriented North East, near internal ladder found with rust spots, need to be repaired. Contractor to submit method statement. 1) Noted demister pads were loose and not fitted tightly in nozzle N2 of the vessel, not in accordance to the General Note # 36 of the IFC Drwg. # J-Y2K5-216-091 Demister Pad will be oversized suitably for tight fit in the vessel, for clarification/verification with engineering and vendor. 2) Internal coating at about 3 x 0.4 mtrs area from bottom head tangency line upwards, oriented North East, near internal ladder found with rust spots, need to be repaired. Contractor to submit method statement. This is to reopen Surv. # 12252 issue that was earlier closed.
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2002
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
17.1
ASME Sec VIII DIV 1
UG 119
1829
12/12/2007 3:21:39 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1830
3/1/2008 3:09:54 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1831
2/25/2008 1:58:32 PM
Following found on internal inspection: 1]Support grating panels for sand filter have clearances between panels (60mm max.) bigger than specified in the As-Built Drwg. R84-D-J-Y2K5-215-048 Rev. 1. 2]Support grating panels have actual widths (435mm) different from specified (289mm) in the AsBuilt Drwg. R84-D-J-Y2K5-215-048 Rev. 1 . 3] As-Built Drwg. R84-D-JY2K5-215-048 Rev. 1 is mismatched with the actual grating dimensions in non conformance to Sched. B par. 1.4. and 3.7 . Contractor to provide corrective action. On inernal inspection of R84-D0405B following were found: Item 1]Incomplete weld penetration at entire length of stilling baffle plate in non conformance to ASME Sec. VIII Div. 1 sec. UW-36 and UW-37(d). Item 2]Deep gouge more than 1mm at the shell plate behind the stilling baffle plate in non conformance to ASME Sec. VIII Div. 1 sec. UW-35 par. (b)(1) and (b)(2). Both are in non conformance to 32-SAMSS-004 par. 1.2 and 11.1.2, and SAES-W010 par. 11.6 and 11.8. Please provide corrective action. This is entered for closure of RFI #s 15503 and 15629 (Vessel Closure Inspection), to be entered to SATRA-2011 Final Insp/Reinst. Checklist if not done by that time. Conferred with A. Al-Somali JGPE Insp., A. AlHamdan JGPE Opns. Proj. Engr., A. Al-Solaili JGPE Opns. Maint. 04Jul2008 for confirming acceptance of the piping installation re N5 connected to inlet line while vessel drawing assigns this with PI (Press. Ind.) & N1 for inlet but was installed with PI of this entry. All agreed that there is no problem with this and only revision of As-Built Dwg. R84-DJ-Y2K5-240-031 Rev. is needed. Emailed to PMT S. Mahmood for follow up with TRG Engg.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
Sch B
1.4 and 3.7
1832
2/16/2008 11:20:32 AM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2003
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-W-010
11.6 and 11.8
32-SAMSS-004
11.1.2
1833
7/7/2008 10:47:32 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1834
9/3/2007 7:05:38 AM
1835
9/26/2007 8:03:39 AM
1836
9/26/2007 9:25:02 AM
On surveillance inspection with Mr. Osman (PID), 2" and 1" PP pall rings were found stocked exposed to sunlight. Internals manufacturer recommends these plastic materials to be shaded (preferrably indoors) from sunlight and open atmospheric conditions to protect from damage and embrittlement. Feed Pipe @ N1 found without drain holes for 20", 14" and 12" and @ N8 for 20", 14" and 8" internal piping (for draining off fluids to dry up pipe internal after testing works per 32-SAMSS-004 par. 16.3.13) Feed pipe @ N1 found without drain holes for 20", 14", and 12", also @ N8 for 20", 14", and 8" internal piping. Please clarify with vendor, for corrective action as necessary. Pipes need to be drained off for future maintenance/repair works. Violation Prevented Installation On routine inspection, following discrepancies were found at R84-C0431: 1) False Downcomer Stiffener (part # B135) above Tray #53 has only 2 pcs. available and as indicated in the parts list also. But actual required as per Kotsch Glitsch Drwg. # C03-12372-D658 Sht. 5 Rev. 3 is 6 pcs., hence, shortage of 4 pcs. 2)M24 SS U-bolts holding 14 distributor pipes above the False Downcomers are obstructing installation of the False Downcomer Beams. 3) 14 distributor pipes have no drain holes, Kotsch Glitsch Drwg. # C03-12372-D659 Sht. 1 Rev. 2 says it should have. These items should be clarified with the vessel and tray manufacturer for resolution
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 6
Schedule Q
1.3
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2009
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
16.3.13
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2009
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
16.3.13
1837
4/13/2007 11:13:44 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1838
3/16/2007 8:25:53 PM
On inspection of installation works for tray no. 25, found: 1)Bolt holes of downcomer plates mismatch with joint plates, needs redrilling. 2)Wear plate at middle downcomer per drawing has skirt at 120deg and 85mm from tray no. 24, but actual installation do not have. 3)Part RB116 downcomer plate according to drawing should be in the installation, but actual materials and parts list do not have this. Please clarify with manufacture and rectify as necessary. Trays were completed and inspected except the center downcomers pending resolution.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1839
3/16/2007 8:25:58 PM
On inspection of installation works for tray no. 25, found: 1)Bolt holes of downcomer plates mismatch with joint plates, needs redrilling. 2)Wear plate at middle downcomer per drawing has skirt at 120deg and 85mm from tray no. 24, but actual installation do not have. 3)Part RB116 downcomer plate according to drawing should be in the installation, but actual materials and parts list do not have this. Please clarify with manufacture and rectify as necessary. Trays were completed and inspected except the center downcomers pending resolution. Vessel has been installed on its structural platform with its west end hemispherical head straddled by the horizontal beam of steel walkway platform causing the beam to be bent and deformed, and also the walkway vertical column to be buckled by 8mm deflection. Contractor need to verify/check vessel head at point of impact/contact for damages to ensure its integrity, and initiate corrective action if necessary.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1840
8/30/2007 12:14:56 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1841
4/13/2007 11:37:59 PM
1842
4/23/2007 1:10:26 PM
On routine inspection, discrepancies were found at R84-C-0441 Adip Extractor: 1) 8 clips welded to vessel shell for 4 internal anodes obstructs installation of RPB Bedlimiters. These clips are indicated in vessel manufacturer Bilfal Dwg. # DA-749501-001 Rev. 3, but not in the Internals Arrangement Drawing no. 1-106.403.845 by Sulzer. 2) Internal ladder rung under Nozzle A1 Manway also obstructs installation of the RPB Bedlimiter. 3) Distributor N2 header (20 ) installed in vessel is carbon steel while Sulzer Distributor N2 Dwg. No. 2-106.403.853 specifies for 316L Stainless Steel. 4)The symmetrical half of segments 1-8 has no attachment to part 002 (Beam), only at the tank support ring through the Universal Clamp. 5)Hex bolts M20 x 100 for item 011 flange joints (40 sets)cannot be tightened as their ends are in already contact with the 20 distributor pipe. These items are to Violation Prevented Installation: On routine inspection following were found: 1)Item 100 Beam 6x150x3000mm is to be installed 15mm away from internal clip to get the correct centering distances of redispenser plates per Dwg. No. 1106.403.851. Temporary washer spacers were inserted to install the assembly. The gap and use of spacers is not as per drawing. 2)Distributor Nozzle N3 has no vent holes but Dwg. No. 1-106.403.850 has this required. 3)Item 001 Beam (2 pcs.) that supports Distributor Nozzle N3 pipe item nos. 003, 004, & 005 per Dwg. No. 1-106.403.850 has drilled holes for the clamps offset by 80mm with the pipes and cannot be clamped down. 4)Pipe item no. 005 (centermost pipe straddling 0 as per Dwg. No. 1106.403.850) for Distributor Nozzle N3 is off by 80mm from vessel center line. These items shall be resolved with the concerned vessel
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1843
3/16/2007 8:07:42 PM
On an inspection with proponent, we found: 1)Missing 48 stainless washers for joint 24/9500R 2)Missing 1/2in. bottom drain holes per drawing 3)Holes per drawing for center distributor pipe unclear whether top vent or bottom drain, existing has top drains only 4)Flange bolts need retightening and plate flanges has flat gaskets, should be spiral wound? 5)Tapped 10mm holes at 16" and 18" flanges of distributor pipes? Please clarify with manufacturer and rectify as necessary. On an inspection with proponent, we found: 1)Missing 48 stainless washers for joint 24/9500R 2)Missing 1/2in. bottom drain holes per drawing 3)Holes per drawing for center distributor pipe unclear whether top vent or bottom drain, existing has top drains only 4)Flange bolts need retightening and plate flanges has flat gaskets, should be spiral wound? 5)Tapped 10mm holes at 16" and 18" flanges of distributor pipes? Please clarify with manufacturer and rectify as necessary. Violation-Prevented Installation Following items found during routine inspection round: 1)Tray panel #24 & #25 were missing for Tray # 3 to 10 2)Tray panel# 24 & 25 were the ones only available for Tray #1 3)Tray #2 panels missing 4)Tray beams for Tray # 11 were missing 5)Steel plates 3mm thk x 110mm x 140mm stenciled A516 Gr. 60 were among materials received but not indicated in drawings 6)As laid out, tray panels adjacent to downcomer plates and at junction with tray beam will have opening of 50mm x 60mm which is not in detail drawings 6)Tray panels will be welded to vessel support rings, panel to panel, and panel to beams, except manway to be bolted and neoprene gasketed. Method statement/welding procedure, vendor/manufacturer approval needed to proceed as vessel is post weld heat treated already.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1844
3/16/2007 8:07:54 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1845
4/29/2007 8:04:06 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1846
5/29/2007 8:15:52 AM
After inspecting the first tray on R84C-0401, we found the following items: 1. Mismatch holes on B-875 shear clips and downcomer beam 4 typical location. See details on drawing C03-12372-D648 SHT.3. 2. Two slotted holes 15mm*20mm of the adjacent side of angular shear clip B-873 are missing. See details on drawing C03-12372-D648 SHT.3. These items are to be resolved by PMT with the vessel and tray manufacturer and it will be subject to re-inspection when correction is done. On routine surveillance, nozzle N2, 20" x 300# WNRF flange was found with scratch 3mm wide x 25mm long x 1mm deep at 20mm radial distance originating from inside diameter of raised face. Raised face width = 54mm. This defect is not acceptable per MSS SP 44 allowable imperfection of 6mm radial lenght for this flange size. Contractor is adviced to correct the defect accordingly. On review of NMR as required by 32SAMSS-004 par. 20.1 for R84-D-, following items were found missing: 1] Ultrasonic thickness readings of vessel shell section, heads, nozzles as per 32-SAMSS-004 par. 20.3 . 2] Alloy verification of all materials except carbon steel as per 32SAMSS-004 par. 12.1.6 . Final Disposition Reports submitted by vendor was used for the NMR verification. Contractor to provide resolution for compliance as required.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1847
7/17/2007 6:05:24 PM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-L-2014
Mechanical
SAEP
SAEP-351
4.3
1848
5/13/2008 1:32:58 PM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2022
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
20.1 and 20.3
1849
2/21/2008 11:36:10 AM
On review of Radiographic Test Reports included in Final Disposition Report (Quality Dossier) Nr. 10 Rev. 0 for Item R84-D-0453 under PO # BNIK-R84-32-A166-DA, it was found that radiography or alternative ultrasonic examination was not done on welds at CS1 location 120-150 and 270-0 (top head to shell circumferential weld jt.) and on CS3 location 120-130 and 240-270 (bottom head to shell circumferential weld jt.) due to obstruction by lifting lug attached on these areas. This is in violation of 04SAMSS-004 par. 14.2.3, ASME VIII Div. 1 Sec. UW-11 par. (a)(5)(a) and par. (a)(7). It is also violating SIS Dwg. # RE-578429-001 and Data Sheet Dwg. # RD-578319-001 requirement for joint eff. 1.00 and 100% radiography. Please provide corrective action or waiver. Violation-Prevented Installation: On routine inspection, vessels R84-D0481, 0465, 0462, 0431 were using temporary A193 B7 stud bolts and A194 2H nuts in violation of 32SAMSS-004 para. 10.4.4 that requires A307 Gr. B bolts. Vessels need to be fixed on permanent bolts before final alignment and succeeding works. The following vessels were noticed with carbon steel grounding lugs and not Austenitic Stainless Steel: D466A/B, D-462 east side, D-463A/B both sides, D-454A/B, D-465, E-446, and E-421. This is violating 32SAMSS-004 para 11.4 and PIP VEFV1100 drawing # VEFV1103 requirements. Contractor has to verify this requirement and list all vessels that have the same nonconformity and act accordingly.
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2022
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
14.2.3
1850
4/27/2007 5:53:35 PM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-L-2007
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
10.4.4
1851
8/27/2007 9:14:20 AM
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-L-2002
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
11.4
1852
5/7/2008 2:21:47 AM
On receiving inspection and review of final disposition reports of vessel R84-D-0487 (Jacket Condensate Drum), following were found: 1.Manhole was not provided in nonconformance with ASME Sec. VIII Div. 1, Par. UG-46(f)(3) and SAES-D001 par. 7.3.4. These requires vessels to be provided with a minimum of 18 inch diameter manway. 2.Head to shell circumferential (category B) and shell longitudinal (category A) weld joints were not subjected to 100% radiography in non conformance to 32-SAMSS-004 par. 14.2.3 (refer to RT Report Nos. 0920, 1058, 1210) : a.Top Head to Shell joint CS1 (Loc. 0-30) and CS1-T (loc. 0-6) b.Bottom Head to Shell joint CS2 (Loc. 0-30) and CS2-T (loc. 0-6) c.Shell longitudinal weld joint LS1-LC3 (Loc. 0-7) and LS1-LC2 (Loc. 0-7). Contractor to provide resolution. Lay-up has not been done yet in violation of SAES-A-007 par. 5.2.1 (Lay-up shall be required for heat exchangers unless start-up is ensured within 14 days of commencing hydrostatic test). Required lay-up is dry lay-up as per 32-SAMSS-011 par. 9.3.10 (After testing, exchangers shall be completely drained and thoroughly dried with dry air to an exit dew point of less than -1C). Violation-Prevented Installation. This is for information only. On routine inspection round, R84-E-0445 A was found having one item 214 (7/8 in. x 10 1/2 in. stud bolt) broken. Four nearby nuts and small portion of item 204 (cover) were found with coating scratches. Extent of damage assessment and corrective actions to be undertaken by Contractor to be informed to SAPMT. This is in violation of Sched. Q Att. IV Para. 7.1 cited by item B1 of SAIC-E-2002 (Received heat exchangers are free of physical damage on its mechanical components).
SATIP-D-00101
SAIC-D-2022
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
14.2.3
Schedule Q
1.3
ASME SEC VIII Div 1
1853
10/16/2007 6:58:39 AM
SATIP-A-00402
SAIC-A-2018
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-A-007
5.2.1 and 5.3
32-SAMSS-011
10.3.9
1854
5/10/2007 1:33:19 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 3 & 4
1855
8/27/2007 9:03:51 AM
External inspection revealed some damages to the insulation supports and holding rings of E-403D. This creates some cracks to the attachment welds to the shell of those supports. this physical damage on the mechanical components of this exchanger is violating item B of SAIC-E-2002 and violating Scheduel"Q" Att. IV, Para 7.1. Contractor is requested to assure that no propagation of the cracks into the bare metal of the shell. In addition, they should provide us with their corrective action to this issue ASAP. Insulation shall not be done to this exchanger until this item is clarified. R84 E-403A was noticed with the following non-conformities to SAIC-E2002 at the stage of external inspection: 1.FDR not provided to PID at this stage of material receiving. 2.Damaged insulation supports due to poor lifting. 3.Severe coating failures were noticed on the external shell. 4.Nozzles N5, N6, and N9 were noticed in conflict with the design drawings 6059651 sheet D101 Rev D. 5.Equipment was noticed with waters and oils in the channel head and shell side indicating insufficient drying at the vendor shop. 6.N10 was noticed with threaded plug. As per SAES-L-110 para 8.1, threaded plug that might posses plant to risk shall be seal welded. R84 E-403B was noticed with the following non-conformities to SAIC-E2002 at the stage of external inspection: 1. FDR not provided to PID at this stage of material receiving. 2. Damaged insulation supports due to poor lifting. 3. Severe coating failures were noticed on the external shell. 4. Nozzles N5, N6, and N9 were noticed in conflict with the design drawings 6059651 sheet D101 Rev D. 5. Equipment was noticed with waters and oils in the channel head and shell side indicating insufficient drying at the vendor shop. 6. N10 was noticed with threaded plug. As per SAES-L110 para 8.1, threaded plug that might posses plant to risk shall be seal welded.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 3 & 4
1856
10/1/2007 1:12:33 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1857
10/1/2007 1:20:55 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1858
10/1/2007 1:24:47 PM
R84 E-403C was noticed with the following non-conformities to SAIC-E2002 at the stage of external inspection: 1. FDR not provided to PID at this stage of material receiving. 2. Damaged insulation supports due to poor lifting. 3. Severe coating failures were noticed on the external shell. 4. Nozzles N5, N6, and N9 were noticed in conflict with the design drawings 6059651 sheet D101 Rev D. 5. Equipment was noticed with waters and oils in the channel head and shell side indicating insufficient drying at the vendor shop. 6. N10 was noticed with threaded plug. As per SAES-L110 para 8.1, threaded plug that might posses plant to risk shall be seal welded. R84 E-403D was noticed with the following non-conformities to SAIC-E2002 at the stage of external inspection: 1. FDR not provided to PID at this stage of material receiving. 2. Damaged insulation supports due to poor lifting. 3. Severe coating failures were noticed on the external shell. 4. Nozzles N5, N6, and N9 were noticed in conflict with the design drawings 6059651 sheet D101 Rev D. 5. Equipment was noticed with waters and oils in the channel head and shell side indicating insufficient drying at the vendor shop. 6. N10 was noticed with threaded plug. As per SAES-L110 para 8.1, threaded plug that might posses plant to risk shall be seal welded. For info and action. Noted scratched and pressed points at shell of the heat exchanger at south side, one with 20mm lght at 1080mm from sliding saddle on upper shell, one with 50mm lght at 2000mm from fixed saddle on both upper and lower shell. Apparently caused by hard contact with metal handling tools/equipments and not soft/resilient material/slings. Suggest to do NDE to confirm affected areas are of cracks.
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1859
10/1/2007 1:28:05 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1860
9/27/2007 8:27:08 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV Para 3 & 4
1861
7/2/2007 11:38:04 AM
1862
5/6/2007 3:06:20 PM
Violation-Prevented Installation: Heat Exchanger R84-E-0431 A & B installed with temporary anchor bolts against 32-SAMSS-004 para. 10.4.4 requiring A307 Gr. B bolts. This was noted on respective SAICD-2007 for installation, alignment, elevation works, and need to be replaced with the final bolt as required. During surveillance inspection it was observed that the pump G-0431 B casing pipe was found 48 inch diameter and 0.4 inch thickness. It is Violating against the reference drawing R84 RA-578695 Sheet 001 Revision A requirements which states that 48 inch diameter, Schedule XS is Ref.ASME B36.10 12.70mm thick. On routine inspection, it was noted that thickness of 40"/42" dia. carbon steel casing pipe is at 8 mm measured at the open end. This is in violation of Drawing RA370847.001.00A that indicates it should be sch-XS (12.7 mm) and sched. Q para. 7 (non conformance to drawing requirements). For corresponding corrective action by the Contractor. On an inspection round, casing pipe intended for R84-G-0401 A & B were found with 10mm thickness against IFC Drwg. RA-578686-001 specified sch-XS (1/2" thk = 12.5mm). This is in violation of Sched. Q para. 7 related to non conformance on drawing requirements.
SATIP-E-00401
SAIC-D-2007
Mechanical
SAMSS
32-SAMSS-004
10.4.4
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
Drawing
R84 RA-578695
1863
7/3/2007 10:47:30 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
Drawing
RA370847.001.00A
1864
5/6/2007 9:18:01 AM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
Drawing
RA-578686-001
1865
9/14/2007 7:31:55 AM
1866
4/30/2008 6:51:46 AM
Following violations found: 1)Suction piping being installed with pipe eccentric reducer 12" x 8" located immediately after pump suction nozzle, no provision for 5 times diameter length of straight run (SAES-G-005 par. 5.2.3) 2) The eccentric reducer 12" x 8" is being installed with flat at the bottom (SAES-G-005 par. 5.2.4) 3) The eccentric reducer 12" x 8" being installed with taper angle exceeding 12 degress. 4) P & ID Drwg. No. R81-A-RA-230446-002-00A indicates "RTJ 900# Flange" for suction and discharge flange connections of the pump. Pump Gen. Arrangement Drwg. #05-016704 indicates pump suction and discharge flanges of raised face, verified by physical inspection. Iso. Drwg. #R81-L-RB597877-001-00A & Piping matl. classification Dwg. #R84-L-RE585599 sht. 83 Rev. B do not include RTJ Flanges. (SAEP 110 par. 3.1, Sched. Q para. 1.4, 3.7, Att. 3 The 6in.-BD-8223-38-04B suction line for pump R84-G-0482B suction nozzle and line 6in.-BD-8223-37-03B for pump R84-G-0482A suction nozzle have the same case of flanges being fitted on forced alignment, bolts were strained on misaligned flange holes, stuck and are not free. Contractor should correct the alignment as per SAEP351 par. 7 step 3 that require studs to pass freely through the flange holes. Reference to line designation information for coating Mod 4 there are many mistakes example line # P9173 & P-9541 required coating as per standard SAES H-002 Para.5.1.3 & scope of work section 3 Para.3.9.3 but as per line designation coating information N/A JEPIU advice the contractor to review all coating, insulation information to avoid missing coating or coating at pipe rack. During our inspection at Mod.4 pipe rack we found the contractor applying different coating system 11A for condensate lines violating SAES H-002 Para.5.6.5 and approved ISOs, as per ISO and standard paint shall be 1A. PLEASE PROVIDE US CORRECTIVE ACTION
SATIP-G-00501
SAIC-G-2005
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
11.7
Schedule Q
1.3
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
SAEP-351
1867
12/19/2006 6:59:11 AM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2023
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-002
1868
3/7/2008 11:12:43 AM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2028
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-002
1869
7/22/2007 6:00:57 PM
During our surveillance at Mod. 4 at pipe rack we found 36" -150C -967075 coated with tow type of coating APCS 1A and APCS 11A as per SAES H-001 Para.5.1 B operating temp.(below 150C) coating shall be APCS 1A . During my routine inspection; R84 E0472 A/B were noticed to have wrong coating system on their skirts. The skirts of these dehydrators will be fireproofed. The skirt should be painted with APCS1B while actually they were painted as per APCS-17A. After verifying the standard requirements and the design data, this is a violation to SAES-H-001 para 7.1.E which states to use APCS-1B under fireproofing. In addition, the existing type of coating on the skirt is not meeting the designed painting system as per the design data 746a05-100DWG. Rev.5. The contractor should apply the required coating system to meet the requirements. 14-150C-10395/10397-1CS9P at 200 pipeway was noticed with some unpainted spools which is violating SEAS-H-002 para 5.1.4. The spotted spools are: 150C-0869-01O, 150C0869-0RL1, 150C0869-01G and 150C-0869-01F. On the other hand, the line identification tag was found printed with P.S.11A while the line was painted with APCS-1A. The contractor is requested to identify the proper painting system for such service and act accordingly to apply it to all spools. Bear pipe is not accepted. The correct P.S. should be reflected in the tags attached to the pipe spools and contractor shall correct the misleading information. During our surveillance at Mod.4 ADIP area we found (5) outlet lines of PZVs without Drain valves violating SAES J-600 Para.9.7.6 (d) PZVs # as follows:- PZV # 501 A/B for D-452B, PZV # 476 A/B for D 452A, PZV # 477 for D-495. Please provide us corrective action
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2031
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-001
1870
3/20/2007 7:41:10 AM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2031
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-001
1871
3/26/2007 1:06:04 PM
SATIP-H-10001
SAIC-H-2023
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-H-002
5.1.4
1872
1/28/2008 4:12:47 PM
SATIP-J-60001
SAIC-J-2009
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-J-600
9.7.5
1873
7/7/2007 1:50:49 PM
On inspection of AHU 1 & 2 Installation using SAIC-K-4005, item A6 requiring raw water hose bib per SAES-K-001 para. 5.1.9 and item A11 requiring equipment nameplate per SAES-K-001 para. 4.8.1.2.3 were found not complied. Contractor is advised to resolve mentioned deficiencies. During the visual inspection of the valves prior to the valves field testing, the following concern was highlighted with regard to the valves hand wheels: 7 valves 6X300 were reported with improper hand wheels which are not fit to the pushing of the valve stems. These valves are not operable with the current received hand wheels. Contractor shall verify this with the vendor as all of them are Orion valves. These valves are considered rejected valves. Contractor shall report all valves with same deficiency and log them out in the rejection log sheet. On inspection thru RFI QR # PIPEVI-710, it was noted that 10" BUTTERFLY VALVE rubber lined has tag VC-1439. As per SA Form 2616 ENG, tag VC-1439 is for GATE VALVE and under 12LC0U class. The correct tag should be VM 18A7 as per the line class. This is in violation of SAES-L-105 specification for 12CG0U line in accordance to SA Form 2616 ENG Piping Matl. Specs. Contractor should provide SA approval for change of tag. During our surveillance at Mod.4 we found all utility lines at utility stations pointed 90 degree violating SAES L-310 Para.18.5 as per standard they shall be pointing 45 degree downward. .please provides us corrective action.
SATIP-K-00102
SAIC-K-4005
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-K-001
5.1.9 and 4.8.1.2.3
1874
6/18/2007 1:40:15 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
1.3
1875
2/10/2008 3:18:12 AM
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2040
Mechanical
SAMSS
04-SAMSS-035
12
1876
3/17/2008 10:19:49 AM
SATIP-L-35006
SAIC-L-2068
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
18.5
1877
2/23/2008 5:55:55 PM
Following need action from Contractor: 1]For R84-E-0402A 24 piping for line no. 36-R84-P-909245-3CS9P spool no. P0-45-3294-01F nozzle N5A, line no. R84-P-9092-453CS9P spool no. PO-45-3294-01H nozzle N5C, line no. 36-R84-P-909245-3CS9P spool no. PO-45-3294-01E nozzle N5D, ends were open and without covers in non conformance to SAES-A-004 par. 7.1.2.b & c. and SAES-L-350 par. 15.2.2 & 3. Pipes already have debris, cutting, weld slags and dirt inside, and marked with Air blowing 28-11-7, pipes have been inspected for internal cleanliness already. Perform internal cleanliness and inspection again and install cover. 2]Nozzle 5D has been installed with flat gasket strips only instead of the full face gasket which is insufficient protection against entry of foreign materials or water/moisture inside the reboiler in non conformance to API 660 par. 11.1.3. Replace gasket strips with full face flat gasket and check/do with other nozzles of the equipment. Poor workmanship in maintaining verticality and horizontality of piping resulting to mis-matches of flanges, force fitting of flanges at flange connections, in non-conformance with ASME B31.3, Par. 335.1.1 (Piping Distortions) noted within the Vicinity of vessel R84-D-476: a. piping and by-pass line of PCV-651, were all bolted up with vertical lines not plumbed, horizontal line not level and with a 90 bend not square in one elbow. b. Miter joint noted on FW-12 of 10 line upstream of PZV-652A/B (Top of R84-D-0467). c. 3 line for Test Pack #A7-0583 being prepared for hydrotest on the same platform of PZV-652A was found to have 3 line clamped to the supports but have the horizontal section sloping back to the middle horizontal elbow. d. Small bore piping between R84-D0467 and E-462 are out of plumb and 90 bends are not square. e. Piping assembly around LCV-
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2011
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-350
15
SAES-A-004
8.1.2
1878
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2011
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-350
15
API 660
11.1.3
1879
3/26/2008 1:24:08 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
ASME-B-31.3
335.1.1
Schedule Q
1.3
1880
2/28/2007 5:32:30 PM
During my surveillance to the lay down yard I have noticed the following: 1.Some of the valves were not dried out and cleaned as per SAIC-L-2041. For ex. valve serial No.05/335/190/4 was not drained and dried from the test fluid for two days. 2.The preservation plans were not followed for the valves that were tested up to this moment which are more than 50 valves. 3.SAIC-L-2041 was filled out and entered into the system. Hard copy is with the originator for reference. The following deficiencies were observed during the routine site visit on 06/17/07 with the valves preservation after field testing: 1.3X300 globe valve tested on 06/11/07 and not removed to the quarantine area. 2.Three valves were tested on 06/11/07 and not covered with end protector and not removed to the accepted valves area. 3.About 5 valves were tested on 06/14/07 while they observed not dried out against the test fluid. Furthermore, most of the tarpaulin covers for the accepted valves were found damaged, worn out, and or blown out due to windy weather. Valves were not protected well against dust. during our serveillance at Mod.4 we found 2 line 16"-R84-P-9156 & 9157 -45-3CS9P the clearance between the bottom of the pipes and grade is less than 300 mm which is violating SAES L-310 Para.12.3 (Above-grade piping shall be supported to provide a minimum of 300 mm clearance between bottom of the pipe and the finished grade) during our surveillance at Mod.4 we found line 30"-R84-P-9104 -513CS9P the clearance between the line and cement line is less than 50 mm before insulation which is violating SAES L-310 Para.12.4 (12.4 A minimum clearance of 50 mm shall be provided for inspection and freedom of pipe movement between above ground piping crossing with any structure (including pipe support structure). This clearance is also required for above ground piping crossing with another pipe)
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2041
Mechanical
SAMSS
04-SAMSS-035
12.1
1881
6/17/2007 3:10:39 PM
NA
NA
Mechanical
ScheduleQ
Schedule Q
A IV para 6
1882
SATIP-L-10801
SAIC-L-2041
Mechanical
SAMSS
04-SAMSS-035
12.1
1883
12/8/2007 4:40:52 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
12.3
1884
12/10/2007 11:22:04 AM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
12.4
1885
12/10/2007 11:35:55 AM
during our surveillance at Mod.4 we found line 20"-R84-P-9190 -403CS9P1 discharge of pump # G 421 A, the clearance between the the pipes and column is less than 50 mm which is violating SAES L-310 Para.12.4 (A minimum clearance of 50 mm shall be provided for inspection and freedom of pipe movement between above ground piping crossing with any structure (including pipe support structure). This clearance is also required for above ground piping crossing with another pipe ) and the column is subject to fire proofing . During our surveillance at Mod.4 we found line # 28"-R 84- P-9108 -55 touch the foundation of E 405 B and the line is subject for cold insulation violating SAES L 310 Para.12.4 A minimum clearance of 50 mm shall be provided for inspection and freedom of pipe movement between above ground piping crossing with any structure (including pipe support structure). This clearance is also required for above ground piping crossing with another pipe. please provide us corrective action. During our surveillance at Mod.4 compressor Area line # 48-P-9172 3CA9P we found at south side the flanges resting on the beam and this line shall be cold insulation there is no space for insulation .please provide us corrective action .
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
12.4
1886
12/12/2007 4:35:30 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
12.4
1887
3/16/2008 11:13:18 AM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2012
Mechanical
SAES
SAES-L-310
12.4
1888
9/2/2007 3:04:48 PM
The piping spools at E-403A/B/C and D platforms were noticed installed on incomplete structure steel members with missing bolts, bolts not finally tightened, and some bolts only hand tightened. This is unsafe action and violates 12-SAMSS-008 and PIP STS-05130 requirements. In addition, it is violating SAIC-L-2011 item C3. The following two lines are examples of this highlight: 1.36-P9196-50-3CA9P/SPL-P1-50-356701H. 2.24-P-9197-50-3CA9P/SPL-P150-3523-01E. Contractor should adhere to erection procedures and to piping installation and inspection checklists such as SAIC-L-2011 requirements. Contractor QC is held countable for controlling such activities and assures coinciding with Aramco requirements. The piping spools at E-403A/B/C and D platforms were noticed installed on incomplete structure steel members with missing bolts, bolts not finally tightened, and some bolts only hand tightened. This is unsafe action and violates 12-SAMSS-008 and PIP STS-05130 requirements. In addition, it is violating SAIC-L-2011 item C3. The following two lines are examples of this highlight: 1.36-P9196-50-3CA9P/SPL-P1-50-356701H. 2.24-P-9197-50-3CA9P/SPL-P150-3523-01E. Contractor should adhere to erection procedures and to piping installation and inspection checklists such as SAIC-L-2011 requirements. Contractor QC is held countable for controlling such activities and assures coinciding with Aramco requirements.
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2011
Mechanical
SAMSS
12-SAMSS-008
Section 1
PIP STS05130
6.2.5
1889
9/2/2007 3:11:05 PM
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2011
Mechanical
SAMSS
12-SAMSS-008
Section 1
PIP STS05130
6.2.5
1890
6/18/2007 2:13:59 PM
The 12-SW-8634-16-12C0U/ SPL02A job sited east of C-441 was observed with the following deficiencies: 1.The spool was not labeled and the tag is hard to be read. 2.The reinforcement pad of the 4 branch connection was cut out improperly and the radius of the reinforcement pad was reduced to unacceptable level. This is just to match the installation of the 12 pup peace to the 12 line. This indicates poor fabrication and measurements on early stages to prevent such deficiency. The contractor is requested not to install this spool until this deficiency is rectified to meet the requirements of our codes and standards. For ex. 01-SAMSS010 para6.1.2 asks for minimum outer radius of 51mm for the reinforcement pad. This is violating SAIC-L-2013 requirements.
SATIP-L-35001
SAIC-L-2013
Mechanical
SAMSS
01-SAMSS-010
6.1.5
Para3
When it was found
Is it related to Design error
Is it H, W, S
Areas of Concern
Comments on the Logbook
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
NO QC Personnal/QC tools / organization chart
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
NA
Schedule Q
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Steel Structure
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Schedule Q
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
IFC/P&ID/Vendor /standard Drawing error/mismatch/vio lation
Construction
No
No RFI /Job not ready
It can be NO RFI and Welding
Construction
No
NA
Schedule Q
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Valves
Construction
No
Construction
No
Construction
No
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Hydrotest
Construction
No
NA
Calibration
Construction
No
NA
Calibration
Construction
No
Pipelines
Construction
No
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Pipelines
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Construction
No
NA
Schedule Q
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
Yes
Valves
Construction
No
Hydrotest
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Material receiving
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Valves
RE-585599 sheet 09 of 99
Construction
No
NA
Material Traceability/preser vation/damage
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Hydrotest
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Insulation
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
Insulation
Construction
No
Welding
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
IFC/P&ID/Vendor /standard Drawing error/mismatch/vio
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Schedule Q
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NDT
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
Static Equipments
UG 46 (f) (3)
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
Hydrotest
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Static Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Rotating Equipments
Construction
No
Rotating Equipments
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Coating
Construction
No
Valves
Construction
No
Rotating Equipments
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Valves
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Valves
Construction
No
NA
Construction
No
Valves
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping
Construction
No
Process Piping

QMIS LBE Rev Mech Part 2

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

QMIS LBE Rev Mech Part 2

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

S#

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Drg # HB-265908001-00 & HA266001-00

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

1.7 and 5.1

1.7 and 5.1

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Piping Line Class 1CA9C4

Project Piping Specification

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

1.3 & 1.7

Violation-After The Fact

1.3 & 1.7

Violation-After The Fact

6.3 & 7.5.1

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Attachment IV para 3.3

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

API PR 520 part II

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

ASME Sec VIII DIV 1

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

1.4 and 3.7

Violation-After The Fact

11.6 and 11.8

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact

20.1 and 20.3

Violation-After The Fact

Violation-After The Fact