Being&Knowledge
, PhD,
along any post-
metaphysical context:
1.Being & Probability
My presentation consists of two parts:
Being&Probability, which I am
presenting now and
Time&Fractal, which I am going to
post in my page of forthcoming
publications in a week:
vasil7penchev.wordpress.com
(Please, look at and comment it, I’ll
answer!)
From Being&Knowledge to
Being&Probability
It is Information that is Substance of
Being, which is Knowledge
Information is a relation between
probabilities
Granted is: two kinds of probabilties –
subjective and objective. We reckon objective
probabilities for Being and we reckon subjective
probabilities for Knowledge
Vasil Penchev, Assoc. Prof.
Institute for Philosophical Research
of the Bulgarian Academy of
Sciences,
vasildinev@gmail.com,
forthcoming publications&
links to my personal pages:
vasil7penchev.wordpress.com
The general frame of presentation:
What means “Being and Knowledge along
any post-metaphysical context”?
I mean “Being&Knowledge along of any
post-metaphysical contexts”
“Being&Knowledge” means: Being and
Knowledge are the same: Being, which is
Knowledge&Knowledge, which is Being,
i.e. Being=Knowledge
Our two basic postulates:
1. No experience might differ anyway
subjective from objective probability, i.e.
Being from Knowledge
2. Substance of Being=Knowledge is
Information as a relation between
probabilities notwithstanding subjective or
objective ones
1
 Being has informational character…

Three theses: • Being of existing: • Being of existing

supplements with being as
preservation, conservation
information
• Quantum information
• Energy conservation law conservation law
1. Being has informational character. • Non-Newton time
2. Information is relation between probabilities. • Newton time – uniformly
infinitesimal,
3. Ψ-function evolves from the representation of the homogeneous, unstructured
information into the space-time. • No physical object is out of • Blinking in space-time:
space-time appearing, disappearing,
here and there happening

•Being of existing supplements •Quantum information

with being as information conservation law
Two kinds of physical being:
sum of Σ
Time is “constant”: any =action
Energetic == moment is just the same as al
any other as a physic
past
quantity
Interaction of
future Being, which doesn’t exist
moments present Action ≥ h means No being
without time&information
== Time is not “constant”: Being with Existing
Informational the moments are different information with energy

•Non-Newton time •Blinking in space-time:

+LVWRULFDOWLPH
General conclusion: since Special relativityis
any ordering
appearing, disappearing, here
discrete time
information
Conclusion: (by Kolmogorov’s
is Space-time
an definition and there happening Being,
is constant in which
inhomogeneous
by means
ordering of complexity),
of choicesConclusion then
of space-time doesn’t
+LVWRULFDOFKRLFHV
Time is a linear exist
time is a set or an ordering
relativity:of information
time is Energy conservation is blinking
ordering of of
$KLVWRULFDOZD\ an ordering expresses its in space-time
But the conclusion ofspace relativity has been:
spheres constant being a set
Conclusion: time space
is an ordering
plural time is an ordering of space
structured Non-linear
a set of orderings
a basic time
Hypothesis: space
or
is some kind
space-time
a body an example
aaghost
aaghost
ghost
ghost
ordering of orderings aaspirit
of information
“La longue durée” spirit
aaspirit
General relativity spirit

2
 •Blinking in space-time:
Information, energy, matter
appearing, disappearing, here
and there happening Being
AXIOM OF
an ordered setA genie in
SELECTION
W a bottle
O Any set can
R be ordered A spirit
D chance in a body
appearing
Maybe thought is being,
in the table
but not existing
(space-time) (an ordering)

Information is a relation between Information is a relation between

probabilities probabilities & PREFERENCES
CHOICES (1-6) & • Which is the CHOICES (1-6) & • Which is the
p
ALTERNATIVES(A-I) p
ALTERNATIVES(A-I)
meaning of meaning of
B C
D E F FG H I ∫ Ψ1(x)lg Ψ2(x)dx
information?
B C
D E F FG H I ∫ Ψ (x)lg Ψ (x)dµ
information?
1 2 µ(x)
6 6

A 5 A 5

4 4
3 Ψ 3 Ψ
2
N1(x)(CHOICES)
&
Ψ2(x) 2
N1(x)(CHOICES)
&
Ψ2(x)
1 N (ALTERNATIVES) 1 µ(x)
N (ALTERNATIVES)
x x
& PREFERENCES

Information is a kind of motion The new notion of information

AXES of HS
is an operator in Hilbert space Al qubits are
If it is a Hermitian 1 2 3 … i …
I=∫∫f1(x)lgf2(x)dµ
µ(x) operator, then
So appears That’s So appears
A=∫∫ψ1(x).ψ ψ2(x)dx is
f1(x) → f2(x) a physical quantity a qubit Why: Hilbert space
The qubit is isomorphic
Ψ1(x) → Ψ2(x) Quantum bit:
f1(x)=| Ψ1(x)| 2 of the unit sphere
x∈C α|0〉〉+ β|1〉〉, |0〉〉⊥|1〉〉
Ψ2(x)|2
f2(x)=|Ψ αi/β
Ci=α βi: |α
αi| 2+ |β
βi| 2=1
To any quantity A corresponds C={c1, c2, c3, …, ci,….} ci∈ClimC =0, i→
→∞
i
To start from the l2-form of Hilbert space

3
That’s why HS is a quantum Qubits representations of HS operators
Properties of ‘classical’ information: Non-linear operators The action on a
it can be (1) copied, (2) destroyed. It qubit acts upon
ATransformation
combination of of others
QCcan’t
(3) processes
interact‘quantum’
with itself. info
It (4) has
α|0〉〉+ββ|1〉〉 inand
Hermitian the plane
TM processes
always a material‘classical’ information
(energetic) α|0〉〉,β
Unitary
(α β|1〉〉)
operators
Is any QC calculation a physical process? β|1〉〉
medium. It (5) is in space-time.
Any physical process
‘Quantum’ is a calculation
information: of QC!
just the Hermitian
For the TM operator “Write ‘1’!” is the QCO:
opposite of the above α|0〉〉
“Do the HS operator ‘F’!” No other difference Unitary
The quantum computer is a math model Phenomena
Rotation of theof
as well as Turing machine Linear operators entanglement
unit sphere

Ψ-function evolves from the

Ψ-function represents a set
representation of the information
ordered by frequency of
into the space-time
chance appearing in space-time
Ψ-function
Ψ -function
Hilbert =
space = basisWorld
starts world
line
from “the line
=whole”
of each its element
1)and
a common
buildsbasis
up anyof its1)part
a common
by means basisofof
all the Ψ-functions all the
fractal similarity to it world lines
a(of
seta Hilbert space) – (of a an ordering
space-time) – C, C, C, …, CL,…
chance appearing into
“theTime-space
whole” “the“a
stars from whole”
part”
Information decreasing
the Ψ
2)and -function
build 2) the world
itselfwhole”
up “the by meansline of
– “a part”
successiveitsimilarity
itself to
– “a
it part” frequency of appearing
Axiom of selection it

World line represents a set To the ordering of equidistant space-time

ordered by time paths between two points in contribution
to the general motion (Feynman path
space-time distant (Ci) = constant
integral interpretation of quantum mechanics)

C, C, C, …, CL,… corresponds

{time} the ordering in time of equidistant

space-time sections along a world line

4
 A hypothesis:
The conclusions are
The successive ordering of
equidistant space-time distances the same as the
along a world line corresponds to
the ordering in decreasing
three theses
frequency of appearing into space-
time of a Ψ-function and to the
ordering in level of similarity of a To remember them!
fractal structure

Conclusions:

1. Being has informational character.

2. Information is a relation between probabilities.
3. Ψ-function evolves from the representation of the
information into the space-time.