Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ICMSA0’09-1
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization
Sharjah,U.A.E January 20-22 2009
θ − θ m +1
0
x b (θ ) = 1 − exp − a (10)
∆θ
Where Qin is the total value of the heat that can be released p m , is the motoring pressure that can be calculated from
from the combustion of the quantity, m f , of fuel. CrV d γ
[( ) pa ]
Qin = η C m f C fl pm = Cr − 1 (16)
(9)
Vγ
Where, C fl is the lower calorific value of the fuel and η c is The mass flow rate through a poppet valve is usually
the combustion efficiency. We consider the combustion described by the equation for the compressible flow through a
efficiency, the value of 0.9. flow restriction. This equation is derived from a one dimensional
The heat addition for spark ignition engines may be a isentropic flow analysis and the real gas flow effects are included
prescribed function of crank angle. The function that is generally by means of an experimentally determined discharge coefficient,
used for calculating mass fraction burned during combustion is CD .
weib function. The mass flow rate is related to the upstream stagnation
pressure p 0 and stagnation temperature T0 , static pressure just
downstream the flow restriction p r and a reference area AR
characteristic of the valve design.
ICMSA0’09-2
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization
Sharjah,U.A.E January 20-22 2009
0.5 chamber was a specified heat flux, which was obtained through
γ −1 1
. C A P P 2γ P engine simulation in first part of analysis.
m = D R 0.50 ( T ) 1 − ( T ) γ γ (17)
Computational model for this analysis is shown below.
( RT0 ) P γ − 1 P
0
0
γ
When the flow is choked, PT ≤ 2 γ −1 the appropriate
P0 γ + 1
equation is
γ +1
1
. C D AR P0 2 2(γ −1) (18)
m= (γ ) 2
( RT0 ) 0.5 γ + 1
ICMSA0’09-3
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization
Sharjah,U.A.E January 20-22 2009
ICMSA0’09-4
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization
Sharjah,U.A.E January 20-22 2009
Figure8. Temperature distribution of piston at TDC for Figure10. Temperature distribution of piston at TDC for
compression ratio 11 fuel METHANOL
Molecular
Fuel Formula LHV(Kj/Kg) (A/F)stoi
weight
Methane CH4 16 50010 17.2
Propane C3H8 44 46360 15.6
Methanol CH4O 32 19910 6.5
Ethanol C2H6O 46 26820 9
Table1. Alternative fuels with properties
Figures 9 to 12 show the temperature distribution in the Figure11. Temperature distribution of piston at TDC for
piston when piston is at TDC after ignition. fuel ETHANOL
Figure9. Temperature distribution of piston at TDC for Figure12. Temperature distribution of piston at TDC for
fuel METHANE fuel PROPANE
ICMSA0’09-5
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization
Sharjah,U.A.E January 20-22 2009
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
ICMSA0’09-6