Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
12 DECEMBER) 1966
Assuming a small change in system power AlP the change If, for example, K1 is made large so that
in accelerating power can be expressed
EE2
APa = AP - APac' - APdc. (4) K1X cos 50 << 1
Substituting (1), (2), and (3) into (4) yields APdc - AP
APac t 0.
AlP = 2HpAw + f(Ac) + E1E2 cos 0A_oP
I
X
(5)
Also, with this type of control, the deviation in the phase
The following relationships are readily established from angle between the bus voltages may be limited during a
the previous equations. break in the ac link (EjE2/X = 0) providing the dc
AP& Pf (pAw) system is capable of sustaining the necessary overload.
(6) The phase angle between the bus voltages will return
AlP D(p) to its value prior to a system disturbance with
APac t EX12
APl = D(p)X cos 0o Aco (7) f(Aco) = KoAco + Ki-+ p2
p
where
This characteristic is evident from the steady-state
E1E2 evaluation of (6) and (7) which yields, APdc = AP and
D(p) = 2Hp2Aw + pf(Ao\) + E- cos Aw. (8)
x o
Apact = 0.
Once f(Aw) has been defined, the previous equations may Since these methods of control will be referenced quite
be employed to predict the transient and steady-state frequently in this paper, it is convenient to establish the
performance of this simplified ac-dc system when sub- following notation:
jected to small changes in system power. In this paper, Type A f(Awo) = KoAw,
the results of a computer study will be presented rather
than a hand analysis of these equations, however, several Type B f(Aw) = KoAo + K1-
important characteristics may be readily observed. p
It is apparent from (6)-(8) that system damp-
ing may be achieved by making f(Aw) directly propor- Type C f(Aco) = KoAw+ K-+K K2-
tional to Aco. Moreover, f(Aco) can be selected so as to p p2
determine the steady-state operation after a change in Although other methods of control are possible, these
power has occurred. These features are of importance three basic controls incorporate interesting features
and shall be discussed briefly. If f(Aco) = KoAco, steady- which warrant investigation.
state evaluation of (6) and (7) yields APd, = 0 and APact =
AP. The change in system power is accepted by the ac
system. More important, however, is the fact that with AC-DC POWER SYSTEM STUDIED
f(Acw) = KoAw, system damping may be controlled by In an earlier paper, a method of representing an ac-dc
adjusting Ko. Thus, a change in power might be accepted system in a direct and quadrature axis was presented [2].
by altering the ac transmitted power in a critically The method of simulation as well as results of an analog
damped manner. Since the incorporation of a signal computer study of a 1-machine infinite bus system with
directly proportional to the change in rotor speed pro- parallel ac and dc links are set forth. The ac-dc system used
motes system damping, it seems logical to include this in the investigation reported here is identical to system
signal as a part of any proposed f(Aco). described in the previous paper. Although the method
Steady-state operation is influenced if of simulation will not be repeated, it seems appropriate to
include a brief description of the ac-dc system.
f(Aw) = KoAco + K1-. A 1-line diagram of the parallel ac-dc power system
p which was simulated on the analog computer is shown in
In this case, steady-state evaluation of (6) and (7) yields Fig. 2. In this system, a 4000 Mva equivalent machine is
connected synchronously to an infinite bus by 500 miles of
APdC 1
500 kV-ac transmission line (50 percent compensated) and
Ap E1E2 asynchronously by 500 miles of 500 kV-dc transmission
+ K1X ° line. A capacitor bank which delivers 18.85 Mvar and a
APac_ 1 2000 Mva resistive load (unity power-factor load) are
APl K1X connected to the generator bus. With the generator operat-
+ ing at rated power input (4000 Mva) the system consumes
E1E2 cos 80 50 percent of the generated power in the vicinity of the
It is apparent that the value of K1 determines the steady- generator with approximately 50 percent of the power
state mode of operation after a change in system power. transmitted to the infinite bus.
1966 PETERSON AND KRAUSE: DAMPING OF POWER SWINGS 1233
500 MILES - override (ecR and eci*, respectively) are developed from the
I
18.85 MVAR
500-KV AC LINE difference between a reference current (independent of
w;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I;l
~ changes in rotor speed) and the dc line current [2], [3].
'1H3e 50% SERIES
COMPENSATION In this study, the method of developing the control signals
230 KV 230 KV ecR and ecl* differs in that the reference current is the
4000 MVA sum of a set reference and f(Aco). In particular,
2000 MVA
UNITY pf
L-3 &-. ecR = KR (I, - IR)
ecI* = K1(kIr - I)
Fig. 2. A 1-line diagram of system simulated on analog computer. where
KR-gain of rectifier controller
.05 .315 .315 .05 Kr-gain of inverter controller
53.0 .026 .026 JR-rectifier current
'13 1.165 II-inverter current
k-a constant less than unity (0.9 in this study)
1.1 pu l.0 pu
Ir- IrO + f(Aw)
H = 12
INFINITE Iho-constant or set reference current.
.108 .0926 .0926 .108 BUS
0.605 RESULTS OF COMPUTER STUDY
~~~\\ /
sum
~~~7.74
sum
In this section the methods of control proposed in
I
T 4.25 Uhlmann [1 and considered briefly in the opening section
are investigated using an analog computer simulation of a
Fig. 3. System constant on 1000-Mva base 230-kV bus voltage. 1-machine, infinite bus ac-dc system. In order to compare
the action of these controls, relatively small changes in
system power are considered about a common operating
The system parameters, referred to a 1000 Mva power point. With one exception, which will be discussed,
base with 230 kV as the base line-to-line voltage, are given the initial condition of operation was that wherein the
in Fig. 3. The transformer connections and the converters input torque to the generator was set at 4.0 per unit
are arranged so that with 1.0 per unit bus voltage, the no-
(4000 Mva); the reference current of the dc system set so
load rectifier output voltage is 1.65 per unit referred to the that approximately 1.0 per unit, dc power was transmitted
ac system.
from the generator bus, and the resistiv-e load at the
The machine is equipped with a voltage regulator which generator bus adjusted to consume 2.0 per unit power
is adjusted to regulate 1.1 per unit generator bus voltage. (1.1 per unit generator bus voltage). For this condition,
The per-unit parameters of the machine are as follows: the ac power transmitted from the generator bus is
approximately 1.0 per unit. Small changes in system power
Machine System were incurred by programming step changes in the gener-
Base, Base, ator input torque and generator bus loading (step changes
4000 1000
Mva Mva in the resistance of the unity power factor load). In each
ra armature resistance 0.005 0.00124 case the following variables are recorded; Ei-exciter
Xia armature leakage reactance 0.1 0.025 voltage, Vqy-qR-axis bus voltage, VR'-rectifier voltage,
rfd field resistance 0.00055 0.0001375 IR-rectifier current, Pac,-ac power transmitted from
Xlf d field leakage reactance 0. 1 0.025
rkd direct-axis damper winding 0.02 0.005 generator bus, Pd0-rectifier power, Ta-accelerating torque,
resistance and 6-power angle, that is, the angle between the quad-
Xlkd direct-axis damper winding leakage
reactance 0.1 0.025 rature axis of the machine and the quadrature axis of the
rkq quadrature-axis damper winding infinite bus.
resistance 0.04 0.01
Xlkq quadrature-axis damper winding
leakage reactance 0.2 0.05 Performance of an AC-DC System during Changes in
Xad direct-axis magnetizing reactance 1.0 0.25
Xaq quadrature-axis magnetizing 0.7 0.175 System Power-Stabilization Control not Incorporated
reactance
H inertia constant 3 seconds 12 seconds The computer tracings given in Figs. 4 and 5 demon-
strate the performance of the ac-dc system during system
disturbances with f(Aco) = 0. In particular, Fig. 4 shows
The 6-phase rectifier is equipped with a constant current the system response due to input torque disturbance;
control and is connected to the generator bus. A constant Fig. 5 shows the system response due to step changes in the
extinction angle control with a current override is in- power consumed by the resistive load connected to the
corporated in the inverter controller. generator bus. With the initial condition of operation as
In the computer studies presented in previous papers, stated above, the generator input torque (Fig. 4) was
the control signals of the rectifier and the inverter current stepped from 4.0 to 4.25 per unit. The power angle
1234 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS DECEMBER
2.0
Vq R
q 0 1.0l SEC.
VR | RECTIFIER VOLTAGE
RECTIFIER CURRENT
.0
2D AC POWER-TRANSMITTED
DC POWER-RECTIFIER
Pdc
ACCELERATING TORQUE
1--INPUT TOGRUE
INCREASES TO 4.25 PU
la-INPUT TORQUE
DECREASED TO 3.75 PU
-INPUT TORGUE
INCREASED TG 4.0 PU
POWER ANGLE
2.0
Ex
V RR
VIn |
RECTIFIER CURRENT
AC POWER-TRANSMITTED
DC POWER RECTIFIER
1.0t
Pd c
ACCELERATING TORQUE
To5 t\ s
0.5
0
|_-RESISTIVE LOAD
DECREASED TO 1.75 PU
-RESISTIVE LOAD
INCREASED TO 225 PU
a-RESISTIVE LOAD
DECREASED TO 2.0 PU
POWER ANGLE
6 : _
oscillates about the new operating point illustrating The action of a Type B control is shown in Figs. 8 and 9.
the small amount of damping present in this ac-dc system. In this case, Ko was held at 0.75, and K1 was adjusted so
After establishing steady-state operation at this increased as to minimize the change in power angle as well as the
power angle, the input torque was stepped from 4.25 overshoot in the dc power as the dc system accepts the
to 3.75 per unit. When the system had again estab- larger part of change in system power. The value of K1
lished steady-state operation, the input torque was used in Figs. 8 and 9 was 0.66.
stepped from 3.75 per unit to the original value of 4.0 per Figures 10 and 11 show the system response with a Type
unit. This switching sequence was used for all studies C control incorporated. Ko, K1, and K2 were set at 0.75,
wherein the system response to generator input torque 0.66, and 0.19, respectively. The value of K2 was selected
disturbances was investigated. so that the power angle returned to its original value in a
The effects of load switching at the generator bus are relatively small time interval with satisfactory control of
illustrated in Fig. 5. From the initial operating condition the dc power maintained.
the resistance was changed so that the power consumed The computer recordings shown in Figs. 12 and 13
by the unity power factor load decreased from 2.0 to demonstrate system response with controls which have not
1.75 per unit (1.1 per unit bus voltage). After steady-state been considered previously. The tracings shown in Fig. 12
operation was re-established, the resistive load was illustrate the system response during input torque distur-
switched from 1.75 to 2.25 per unit followed by a step bances with a control incorporated wherein KD = K2 = 0
change in bus loading from 2.25 per unit to the original and K1 = 0.66. Since Ko = 0, the system is quite oscilla-
2.0 per unit. The input torque was maintained at 4.0 tory. The sustained oscillations after the initial step
per unit throughout this study. This same sequence of load change in generator input torque is attributed to the large
switching was used for all studies involving load switching value K1 which at this increased dc power level (small de-
at the generator bus. lay angle) causes alternate control of the current in the dc
system by the rectifier and the inverter. At the reduced dc
Performance of an A C-DC System during Changes in System power level, the rectifier is able to maintain control and
Power-Stabilization Control Incorporated system oscillations are damped out after several seconds.
The computer tracings given in Figs. 6-11, demonstrate Thus, K1 adds some damping to the system. This feature is
the performance of the ac-dc system with Types A, B, and further illustrated in Fig. 13 wherein Ko = 0.75 and K1 =
C controls incorporated. More specifically, Figs. 6 and 7 0. It was found that the system was unstable with K2 set
illustrate the performance of the ac-dc system during at the value used in Figs. 10 and 11. In order to obtain the
changes in system power with a Type A control; Figs. 8 system response to input torque disturbance shown in
and 9-Type B, and Figs. 10 and 11-Type C. In each case, Fig. 13, it was necessary to reduce K2 to 3 X 10-4. With
the initial operating condition was that described previ- this low value of K2, it required a longer time interval
ously. System response to changes in the generator input for the ac system to return to its original power angle than
torque are shown in Figs. 6, 8, and 10. The system per- in Figs. 10 and 11 where K1 = 0.66 and K2 = 0.19.
formance during load switching at the generator bus are
given in Figs. 7, 9, and 11.
In order to illustrate the complete characteristics of Performance of AC-DC System during a Break in the AC
these controls it would be necessary to consider variations Line-Type C Control
in all of the control parameters (Ko, K1, and K2). For If the dc system is capable of accepting the ac trans-
example, the characteristics of a Type C control and the mitted power without failure, Type B and C controls will
influence of each control parameter could be obtained limit the power angle between the mnachine and the infinite
only after an extensive study wherein independent vari- bus when the ac power flow is disrupted. In the case of a
ations of Ko, K1, and K2 are considered. This type of a Type B control, a deviation from the original power angle
study is important but seems impractical at this time. will occur in the steady-state, however, with a Type C
In the studies shown in Figs. 6-11, satisfactory system control the power angle will return to its original value.
response during changes in system power was obtained by The computer recording shown in Fig. 14 illustrates the
adjusting Ko for the Type A control. With Ko maintained system performance and the action of a Type C control
at this value, K1 was adjusted to give acceptable system (Ko = 0.75, K1 = 0.66, and K2 = 0.19) during a loss of
response for the Type B control. Similarly, Ko and K1 were transmitted ac power. In this study the input torque was
fixed and K2 adjusted to obtain satisfactory system fixed at 3.5 per unit with an initial transmitted ac power of
response with the Type C control. approximately 0.5 per unit. The loss of ac transmitted
A comparison of Figs. 6 and 7 with Figs. 4 and 5, power was simulated by suddenly de-energizing the ac line.
respectively, reveals the system damping which is possible The action of Type C control causes the power angle to
by incorporating a Type A control. The value of Ko which return to its original value after a transient deviation of
yields this near critically damped response of the power approximately eight degrees. The ac line was re-energized
angle was found to be 0.75. Variations about the new in approximately nine seconds after' the break. The elec-
operating point, after a system disturbance, is determined trical transients of the ac line decay relatively fast and the
primarily by the characteristics of the voltage regulator. system readily established its initial mode of operation.
1236 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS DECEMBER
2.0r
2.0
1.0. EXCITER vOLTAGE
I1. EXCITER VOLTAGE
Vq;-J
BUS VOLTAGE qIR-Gols)
1.0 SEC.
Vq R
L.r I
I -.O SEC.
L
VKIF 1 O
RECTIFIER VOLTAGE
2.0
RECTIFIER CURRENT
'N
2s
RECTIFIER CURRENT IR
1.0 t{
2.0 r
Pt
2 AC POWER-TRANSMITTED PtS AC POWER-TRANSMITTED
'LF L
2.0
20 DC POWER- RECTIFI ER DC POWER-RECTIFIER
Pdc 1.0
0 L
Fig. 6. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator input Fig. 8. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator input
torque-Type A control; Ko = 0.75. torque-Type B control; Ko = 0.75, K1 = 0.66.
2.0
2.0
E0
E
1.0 EXCITER VOLTAGE I
EUCITER VOLTAGE
L
o
F 1.0 SEC.
V R '4
*CL1 -|f 1.0 SEC.
0:1
2.o[
2.0r IR RECT IF ER CURRENT
RECTIFIER CURRENT
,.0 r- -
oL L.
2.0
2.0
AC POWER-TRANSMITTED AC POWER-TRANSMITTED
pt b
cc
.0E
Pt
2.0
2.01 DC POWER -RECTI F IER DC POWER-RECTIFIER
Pd.,<
Pdc o
T,, 0O
-Q.5
I-RESISTIVE LOAD I|-RESISTIVE LOAD
INCREASED TO 2.25 PU
I-RESISTIVE LOAD2.0 |-RESISTIVE LOAD
DECREASED TO 1.75 PU
|-RESISTIVE LOAD
INCREASED TO 2.25 PU
-RESISTIVE
DECREASED
LOAD
TO 2.0 PU
DECREASED TO 1.7S PU DECREASED TO PU
0
6 I
66 POWE R A N GLE POWER ANGLE
Fig. 7. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator bus Fig. 9. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator bus
loading-Type A control; Ko = 0.75. loading-Type B control; Ko = 0.75, K1 = 0.66.
1966 PETERSON AND KRAUSE: DAMPING OF POWER SWINGS 1237
2.0 E 2.0
E,
o.0| EXCI TER VOLTAGEI EX0O ECITER VOLTAGE
Vq0
. - 1.0 SEC.
vqR'it
L I 0 -4 1.0 SEC.
' -
i RECTIFIER VOLTAGE v| 0.8 RECTIFIER VOLTAGE
0.8[
2.0 2.0.
RECTIFIER CURRENT RECTIFIER CURRENT
R I
'B
IR
0~ ~~ L_
.OI
2.01 2.0 .
ptQC AC POWER-TRANSMITTED P1
1.0 _
1:0
L
2.0 DC POWER-RECTIFIER 2.0.
DC POWER -RECTIFIER
Pd. 1.0,
Pdc t_
-f
p L
0.5 ACCELERATING TORQUE 0.5 ACCELERATING TORQUE
Ta o T. 0
-0.5,
PUT TORQUE I-INPUT TORQUE -INPUT TOROUE |_N PUT TORQUE
INCREASED TO 4.25 PU
-|INPUT TORQUE IRPUT TORQUE
INCREASED TO 4.0 PU
INCREASED TO 4.25 PU DECREASED TO 3.75 PU INCREASED TO 4,0 PU DECREASED TO 3.75 PU
go*f r.. ...
601ol
-_
40
D POWER ANGLE -40 PO,
o L 9U ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~POWER ANGLEL
Fig. 10. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator in- Fig. 12. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator in-
put torque-Type C control; Ko 0.75, K1 = 0.66, K2 0.19. = = put torque; Ko K2 0, K1 0.66. = = =
2.0r
EX 1. EXCITER VOLTAGE
1.0 EXCITER VOLTAGE
20.02.0
RECTIFIER CURRENT 0B
1
2.0 RECTIFlIER CURRENT
IRI.
2.0
AC POWER -TRANSMITTED 2
pt
L
P.t ..O.
AC POWER-TRANSIUITTED
WT
2.0 DC POWER-RECTIFIER
.0
0
0.5S ACCELERATING TORQUE 05 ACCELERATING TORQUE
To l To o59
s-RESISTIVE LOUD *-RESISTIVE LOAD - RESISTIVE LOAD
20P-INPTTRU NPTTOQE-INPUT TORQUE
DECREASEOD TO I7T
RESIP5UT I V NECLOAgt A
INCREASED
TO 2025P
TO
25 -RE S
PUDECREASESD TO
S T |VS A2.0 INCREASED TO 4.25 PU DECREASED TO 3.75 PU INCREASED TO 4.0 PU
40 6 p
POWER ANGLE OER ANGLE
Fig. 11. The ac-de system response to step changes in generator bus Fig. 13. The ac-dc system response to step changes in generator
loading-Type control; Ko 0.75, K1 0.66, K2 0.19. = = = input torque; Ko = 0.75, K1 = 0, K2 3 X 10-4. =
1238 1EEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER APPARATUS AND SYSTEMS DECEMBER
E,
2.0
REFERENCES
I.G0 EXCITER VOLTAGE [1] E. Uhlmann, "Stabilisation of an A. C. link by a parallel
D. C. link," Direct Current, pp. 89-94, August 1964.
[21 H. A. Peterson and P. C. Krause, Jr., "A direct- and quadra-
BUS VOLTAGE IqR-xisl) ture-axis representation of a parallel AC and DC power sys-
1.0 tem," IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol.
VqR PAS-85, pp. 210-225, March 1966.
F-t0 SEC. [3] H. A. Peterson, P. C. Krause, Jr., J. F. Luini, and C. H.
Thomas, "An analog computer study of a parallel AC and DC
power system," IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Sys-
VA- tems, vol. PAS-85, pp. 191-209, March 1966.
0.8 RECTIFIER YOLTAGE
[4] H. A. Peterson, D. K. Reitan, and A. G. Phadke, "Parallel
oL- operation of AC and DC power transmission," 1964 IEEE
2.0 RECTIFIER CURRENT
Internat'l Cony. Rec., vol. 12, pt. 3, pp. 84-89.
[5] M. Riaz, "Analogue computer representations of synchronous
Is generators in voltage-regulation studies," Trans. AIEE
(Power Apparatus and Systems), vol. 75, pp. 1178-1184, De-
0 cember 1956.
2.0
[6] P. C. Krause, "Simulation techniques for unbalanced electrical
p t AC POWER-TRANSMITTED machinery," Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Law-
rence, 1961.
[7] R. H. Park, "Two-reaction theory of synchronous
0 machines-generalized method of analysis; Part I," Trans. AIEE,
2.0 DC POWER-RECTIFIER vol. 48, pp. 716-727, July 1929.
[8] C. Concordia, Synchronous Machines. New York:Wiley, 1951.
1.0 [9] R. A. Hedin, "The dynamic behavior of a synchronous gen-
erator with a rectifier load," M. S. thesis, University of Wis-
0
consin, Madison, 1964.
ACCELERATING TORQUE [10] C. Adamson and N. G. Hingorani, High Voltage Direct Current
T .
Power Transmission. London: Garraway, Ltd., 1960.
-0.5
[11] C. Concordia and L. K. Kirchmayer, "Tie-line power and
I-ACDEENERGIZED
LINE -AC LINE frequency control of electric power systems," AIEE Trans.
REENERGIZED (Power Apparatus and Systems), vol. 72, pp. 562-572, June
so,-. 1953.
401 [12] ,"Tie-line power and frequency control of electric power
POWER ANGLE systems-Part II," AIEE Trans. (Power Apparatus and Sys-
tems), vol. 73, pp. 133-146, April 1954.
[13] E. Uhlmann, "The representation of an H. V. D. C. link in a
Fig. 14. Performance of ac-dc system during break in ac line-Type network analyser," CIGRE, vol. III, paper 404, 1960.
C control; Ko = 0.75, K1 = 0.66, K2 = 0.19.
use and has proven satisfactory. An entire session of this meeting is [2] F. R. Schleif and J. H. White, "Damping for the Northwest-
devoted to it [1]-[4]. Southwest tieline oscillations-An analog study," this issue, page
A third method [5],[6] is to inject an auxiliary signal into the 1239.
[3] E. A. Gissel, T. B. Hardy, and E. F. Timme, "Performance of
generator voltage regulators in addition to the usual ac terminal the Northwest-Southwest intertie," presented at the 1966
voltages. The auxiliary signal may be almost any quantity which IEEE Winter Power Meeting, New York, N. Y., January 30-
varies during the oscillation to be damped. One such signal is the February 4.
rate of change of terminal voltage. [4] J. S. Hooper, G. E. Adams, and J. C. Conder, "Damping of
system oscillations with steam electric generating units," pre-
A fourth method is to vary periodically the transfer impedance of sented at the IEEE Power Meeting.
the ac transmission link, for example, by switching a series capacitor [51 P. Althammer, "Questions of stability of E.H.V. transmission
bank alternately in and out of the circuit. The transmission system systems," Brown Boveri Rev., vol. 51, no. 1/2, pp. 10-20, January
should be strengthened (by insertion of the capacitors) while the February 1964; esp. p. 15.
[6] H. M. Ellis, A. L. Blythe, J. E. Hardy, and J. W. Skooglund,
machines at the two ends are swinging apart and weakened (by "Dynamic stability of the Peace River transmission system,"
removal of the capacitors) while they are swinging together. The IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, pp. 586-600,
principal practical obstacle to the application of this method is the June 1965.
lack of a high-voltage switch suitable for continual operation. [7] E. W. Kimbark, "Improvement of system stability by switched
series capacitors," IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and
The same general method is effective for defense against large Systems, vol. PAS-85, pp. 180-188, February 1966.
disturbances such as the complete loss of the dc line in the system [8] 0. J. M. Smith, "Optimal transient removal in a power system,"
considered in the paper as a result of a permanent 2-pole fault [7]. IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-84,
Damping of large disturbances can be controlled so as to be pp. 361-74, May 1965.
"dead-beat" [8].
If artificial positive damping is required, it should be applied
redundantly as to methods or locations, so that if one generator or
line having such provision be out of service the remaining ones will
still provide adequate damping. One bipolar dc line, controlled as H. A. Peterson and P. C. Krause, Jr.: The authors appreciate the
suggested in the paper, would be adequate except in the rare event of comments of Dr. Kimbark, who has effectively summarized the
loss of both poles. Two dc lines or one dc line plus one of the other methods of providing damping of power swings in large systems.
methods would be better. We concur in his concluding remarks that if artificial positive damp-
REFERENCES ing is required, it should be applied redundantly so that at all times
[1] F. R. Schleif, G. E. Martin, and R. R. Angell, "Damping of such damping requirements can be satisfied.
system oscillations with a hydrogenerating unit," IEEE Trans.
on Power Apparatus and Systems, to be published. Manuscript received March 7, 1966.