Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
Structural development of knitted fabrics is one of the most important parts of product
development, especially in the case of new effects. Racking is common to all flat knitting
machines and can be used to generate a particular group of effects based on inclined stitches.
In practice the racking patterns are obtained based on rib evolutions with no patterns or
with tuck stitches and miss stitches. Still, this patterning technique presents further design
possibilities. There are two directions that can be taken into consideration for the development of
racking patterns. One is the use of other evolutions than rib, including other patterns [1], [2] and
the other direction is the use of different colours, in order to produce special colour effects [3].
The paper explores the two possibilities mentioned above by presenting interlock fabrics
with racking patterns and colour effects and double-layer fabrics with connection through loops
(tuck stitches) with racking patterns. The fabric structures and the structural effects in these
examples are then characterised and discussed.
In the case of 3D racking effects, the presence of tuck stitches in a specific succession
determines the fabric inclination toward opposite directions. As a consequence the fabric no
longer can maintain its 2D geometry and is forced in a 3D geometry. The ‘egg nest’ fabric,
created by Shima Seiki, is the most interesting example of such racking patterns. Figure 2
presents the knitting sequence.
3. Experimental part
The fabrics designed to illustrate the structural development possibilities for racking
patterns were produced on a Shima Seiki flat knitting machine, gauge 7E. The interlock fabrics
were knitted using 100% acrylic yarns, while the double-layer fabrics were produced with Modal
microfibre from LENZIG, Austria. The fabric variants produced are presented in Table I.
Modal microfibre
Nm 32/2/3
Double-layer with
B1 50% Modal + 50%
loop connection
Cotton , Nm
40/32/2
Modal microfibre
Nm 32/2/3
Double-layer with
B2 50% Modal + 50%
loop connection
Cotton , Nm
40/32/2
Modal microfibre
Nm 32/2/3
Double-layer with
B3 50% Modal + 50%
loop connection
Cotton , Nm
40/32/2
The interlock fabrics present racking patterns obtained by racking 1 pitch successively in
opposite directions – variants A1.1 and A2.1 and by racking 1 pitch successively to one direction
four times and in the opposite direction for another four times – variants A1.2 and A2.2. The
interlock evolutions were produced with yarns of different colours for each rib evolution.
The double-layer fabrics are characterised by two independent jersey fabrics, connected
through loops on a limited number of wales. In the first variant B1 the fabrics are connected only
by loops on the rear needles. The rear bed is racked successively 1 pitch to opposite directions for
four times and then the racking are reversed. Variant B2 presents connecting loops on both beds.
The racking succession is the same as for variant B1. In the case of variant B3 the connecting
loops are first placed on the rear bed needles and the next row on the front bed needles. After
each row there is 1 pitch racking in opposite directions.
If the racking is kept 4 times in each direction, the zigzag effect is different on the two
fabric parts, as illustrated in the structural representation in Figure 4.a. On the part that was
racked (rear) the effect is angled (see Figure 4.c), while on the other fabric part the effect is
curved (see Figure 4.b). Both parts of the fabrics can be used in clothing.
The double-layer fabrics are characterised by higher volume in the connecting area, due to
tuck stitches and their inclined placement caused by racking. In comparison, the areas without
connection are compact and the fabric is much thinner.
It has to be emphasised that in first case the rear evolution is jersey with tuck loops from
the front needles. This causes an interesting situation where, due to the fact that only the loop
element is actually racked, the front stitches are drawn by the loops to even the generated tension
and the rear stitches present no inclination. Figure 7 defines the situation for both parts in the case
of variant B1.
In the case of variant B2 and B3, the tuck loops are placed alternatively on the front and
rear bed. The successive racking in one direction leads to an inclination effect visible only in the
first row. The rest of the rows present no effect even if there was racking. The B2 fabric is
characterised by the same aspect on both sides: a vertical strip of normal stitches and a patterned
strip, as illustrated in Figure 8.a.
Variant B3 has a similar structure, the difference consisting in the alternation of the
patterned areas so to give chess table aspect for the fabric, presented in Figure 8.b.
6th International Conference - TEXSCI 2007 June 5-7, Liberec, Czech Republic
a) b)
Figure 8. Fabric front aspect – variant B2 and variant B3
5. Conclusions
Racking is a productive and efficient way of creating patterns and surface effects on flat
knitting machines. These examples show the potential development solutions especially
regarding new structural effects. The use of evolutions other than rib – interlock and tubular –
opens a range of interesting racking effects. By combining racking patterns with colour patterns
one can obtain a diverse range of colour motifs and effects.
The paper presents the following new aspects for racking patterns. The first aspect
concerns the use of colours and racking patterns for interlock evolutions. The second new aspect
proposed by the authors is about use of racking techniques in the case of the double layer fabrics.
From this experimental work it resulted a new case of stitch geometry in racking patterning: the
rear stitches that are actually racked are keeping their normal position, while the front stitches are
inclined.
Such fabrics can be used in garments for cold season, especially products where the
colour and relief effects are targeted and for products with two faces that present different
properties due to the double layer structure and different raw materials.
Acknowledgements
The present investigation was conducted with the financial support of the National
University Research Council CNCSIS, within the research grant A 437/2006.
The authors wish to thank the LENZIG Company for their cooperation and help.
References
1. Mulhau, G.J., RRG-Bindungen bei der Flachstricktechnik, part 1, Wirckerei und Strickerei
Technik, 9/1992, p. 812-814
2. Mulhau, G.J., RRG-Bindungen bei der Flachstricktechnik, part 2, Wirckerei und Strickerei
Technik, 11/1992, p. 1044-1046
3. Comandar, C., Ciobanu, L., Knitted fabrics with racked patterns, 5th International Textile
Conference, Istanbul, May, 2005, paper on CD
4. Comandar, C., Structura si proiectarea tricoturilor: tricoturi din batatura, Ed. Cermi, Iasi,
2000