Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
White Paper
www.harrisstratex.com
4/30/2008
Page 1 of 3
Adaptive Modulation
The Layer 2 switch performs traffic shaping to control or police the output rate of the transport (airlink) channel, while a scheduler coordinates the traffic using an 8:4:2:1 WRR (weighted round robin) algorithm to fit the available bandwidth. This gives 8 out of 15 opportunities to transport the high priority traffic, 4 out of 15 opportunities to carry the medium-high priority traffic, 2 out of 15 opportunities to carry the medium-low priority traffic and 1 out of 15 opportunities to carry the low priority traffic.
An Example
Figure 1 below shows an AM link operating over time. Without AM this link would be designed to deliver 32 Mbit/s of capacity for 99.99% of the time using QPSK modulation in a fixed bandwidth. By adding AM with an additional two modulation states, the link capacity can be quadrupled to 128 Mbit/s using 64QAM, in the same bandwidth, using the same antenna. This increased capacity is available for 99.9% of the time (more than 364 days in one year), just by taking advantage of the unused link margin, giving an extra 96 Mbit/s of capacity for new Carrier Ethernet services, with the original 32 Mbit/s being preserved for the highest priority traffic.
4/30/2008 Adaptive Modulation White Paper.doc Copyright 2008 Harris Stratex Networks, all rights reserved.
Page 2 of 3
Adaptive Modulation
Regulatory Implications
The concept of adaptive modulation was introduced into ETSI Point to Point standardization in the ETSI DTR/TM-4147, which first specified the requirements and bit rates for packet data interfaces, effects of flexible system parameters and the use of mixed interfaces. A new harmonized standard EN 302 217-2-2 was recently published, which explicitly provides for adaptive modulation within the existing system classes. Systems with lower orders of modulation may be upgradeable to adaptive modulation systems if they continue to comply with the same lower order transmit mask. This means that these systems must adjust the transmit power when using the higher modulation scheme to meet the original mask. In the US, FCC Part 101 Regulations do not address adaptive modulation explicitly, but provide channeling plans and certain technical parameters within which the transmissions must be limited such as channel bandwidths, minimum capacity requirements, power limitations, transmission masks and antenna performance. Provided AM systems meet these requirements then they are allowed under the FCC provisions.
More Information
Click here to learn more about how Harris Stratex Networks has introduced Adaptive Modulation on the Eclipse Carrier Ethernet over Wireless platform.
4/30/2008 Adaptive Modulation White Paper.doc Copyright 2008 Harris Stratex Networks, all rights reserved.
Page 3 of 3