Everybody knows that Turkey, Egypt, North Africa, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Af ghanistan and other Islamic

nations (there are 57 in all) are nearly 100% Muslim . Those countries were Christian, Buddhist and Hindu. Exactly how did this chang e to Muslim happen? When you read history it seems that Islam came, and, magically, the countries ar e Islamic. But of course an event of this magnitude did not simply happen. But o ur schools insist that Islam just happens. In fact, the entire history of the rise of Islamic imperialism is denied in the curriculum of our private, state and re ligious schools. Our schools dont teach how Islam transforms each and every natio n it invades to pure Islam, how it happens and what the consequences are. This i s the law of Islamic saturation. Our history denies the truth of the Islamification of civilizations. Actually, o ur history denies that Islam is even involved. It was the Turks, the Arabs, the Moors and so on. There is no Islam, just some ethnic group. Look even closer at the history and ask this question: how many Kafirs (non-Musl ims) died in Islamic conquest? You may find a number of dead here and there at a particular battle, but the establishment answer of the number murdered by jihad is zero, zip, none. In fact, there was not even a category called jihad deaths. Y ou see Islam just happens. After 9/11, there was an intellectual response to the establishment intellectual vacuum about how Islam actually functioned. A revolution of new scholarship on Islam was created by those amateur scholars who are outside the brain-dead estab lishment academy. The minds and labors of Bat Yeor, Spencer, Trifkovic, Bostom, W arraq, Warner, Phares and many others tackled the problem of the true nature of Islam. The new scholarship gave answers to all of the questions Islamic coloniza tion of the world. The Center for the Study of Political Islam coined the name, Tears of Jihad, for the deaths caused by Sharia law. There is no way to actually come up with a pre cise number of deaths, because Islam has written the history (after all, they we re the winners) and, of course, the history is all beautiful. There is only one way to even get close to a precise answer and that is for the academy to take up this subject and treat it as a priority. Conferences would be held, papers give n, journals published with peer reviews and the rest of the academic critical th ought process would go on for decades and many papers. If the answer to the total jihad deaths is not zero, then CSPI proposes that 270 million Kafirs have been murdered over the last 1400 years. This figure include s 60 million Christians and 80 million Hindus. What if only 30 million Christian s had been killed? Does that mean that we should continue for churches to ignore the Coptic murders in Egypt today and deny the million Armenians killed in the 20th century? Would Hindus have more or less courage if only 50 million, instead of 80 million had been murdered? This is a civilizational problem, not an accounting problem. It is not that we d eny that 270 have been killed by jihad; we deny that Islam is even at war with a ll Kafirs and Kafir civilization. A better kill number wont erase the cowardice t hat blinds us today to an acknowledgment that Islam has a history of annihilatin g all civilizationthe law of Islamic saturation. It is interesting to see peoples reaction to the numbers. The vast majority ignor e them. They dont want to know. The most political figure is the number of Africa ns killed in jihad for the slave trade. The establishment tells us that all slav es were bought here from the West coast of Africa by Christians. It turns out th at the slave trade was also on the Mediterranean and the east coast of Africa an d each and every one of the wholesalers in Africa were Muslims. This knowledge v iolates the establishment dogma of Christian evil. One of the failures of the number 270 million is that it does not include the nu mber of the Zoroastrians killed in Persia and other minorities such as the Sabia ns and Bahai. Who knows how many peasants died in some village without a name, s imply because they did not believe that Mohammed was the prophet of Allah? So, if the number is not 270 million, then what is a better number? Use critical

thought to answer this problem, and dont tell us that the number is zero. Give u s an improvement, not a denial. We have had denial for 1400 years.