Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
City of Auburn--May 2008 through October 2011 Glenn E. Aho Accepting the position of Auburn's City Manager was a risk but also an opportunity. It was a risk in terms that there existed incredible political pressure to combine city services and an incumbent acting city manager who was vying for the top position. The opportunity existed in that there was a City Council who wanted change, accountability, transparency, and a reduced tax burden. As I too shared these high ideals for local government, I accepted the responsibility, the opportunity, and the risk. The public expects operational and financial accountability from local government and it's been too long since these expectations have been met, if ever. Falling short of this expectation is just one reason why tax initiatives such as the Tax Payer Bill of Rights (TABOR) keeps returning. These narrowly defeated initiatives have represented more than just draconian reductions to municipal budgets. They represent a message to public officials. The message is to reduce the property tax burden on your own accord by managing local government resources better; otherwise, expect another initiative to be forthcoming. That's the writing on the wall. So rather than wait for the next tax initiative to appear, Auburn was working to position itself as a City that took TABOR seriously. We wanted Auburn to be able to explicitly outline what changes have been made since the last TABOR, and what changes were going to be made in anticipation of the next TABOR. This call-to-arms created a "natural sense of urgency" to fulfill a promise to our taxpayers that everything possible was being done to reduce the property tax burden. Auburn would be able to demonstrate its efforts by producing tangible, managerial results. While this initiative was underway, some individual City Councilors called for changes to hold employees even more accountable. Added pressure for change also came from events such as the oil crunch of 2008 and 2009; the Council's "Million Dollar Challenge"; and subsequent calls from the Council for more budget reductions. These events created a "forced sense of urgency" and when coupled with the "natural sense of urgency" to respond to TABOR, it set the stage for everything having to change, and to change fast. Attempting to meet these expectations was not going to be easy but the Mayor and City Council stated the decision making regarding budget reductions would be left up to the City Manager. In hindsight, it would have been best for the Mayor and City Council to set additional budget reduction policies to give clear direction, as any reductions would need to include personnel and services. However, I accepted this budget reduction responsibility as directed and work was then underway. Understanding how slow government can be to change, we drew upon existing and proven models of organization. From the military we borrowed the concept of reduced span of control; and, from the private sector we borrowed concepts of team and cost accounting. Under this new organization, the City saved money, increased intra-departmental cooperation, established standards of accountability and expectation, and more. By all accounts, Auburn was
1|Page
2|Page
3|Page
4|Page
5|Page
Assessing:
6|Page