Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Historical Background
clinical research was primarily the province of medical school departments and of
physicians who conducted studies in addition to operating a full clinical practice.
Clinical trials were not the primary focus of either of these groups but were an ancillary
operation or a sideline, and the revenues from these clinical trials were not relied upon to
meet the basic expenses of the medical school or physician’s office.
No financial pressure.
Now…
On the major stock exchanges one can now invest in companies which are in the business
of conducting clinical trials.
In addition, a myriad of CRO now do business in the United States and Europe;
professional investigators (MDs, PhDs, PharmDs, and others) operate single or multisite
centers;
professional institutional review boards advertise their timeliness and speed in the review
of clinical protocols;
investigators join together and form affiliations for the conduct payment of certain types
of clinical trials; and
medical schools and medical centers establish the equivalent of corporate offices
devoted to the promotion of clinical trials as a means to generate funds for the university
or medical center as a whole.
Preparing the Budget:
Defining “Real” Costs
“Hidden” costs:
Time/cost to obtain special reports
Copy cost for X-rays, MRIs etc.
Cost increases for studies that go on later than one year
- inflation, health system price increases, etc.
Personnel costs
screening, training of staff, failed enrollment, etc
Cost of starting enrollment late
“Hidden” costs:
Sponsor imposed costs -
monitoring visits
– poorly trained monitors
– monitor turn-over during course of study
inefficient handling of study queries and data corrections
processing amendments
Business Analysis:
Financially sound study?
Cost of doing trial < Budget payments
Academic Analysis:
Quality of the Science?
Phase I, II > Phase III, IV
Right Answer: balance between the two
Incentive payments
many times not included in study contract
how to handle appropriately?
Include in study contract
Conflict of interest issues
IRB concerns
Go directly to investigator?
Place in educational fund?
Institutional policy
Negotiation tools:
Past performance by investigator or site
Data base of potential subjects
Summary