Grimes - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

C-FBISD VISION:
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
Mary Grimes Education Center CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

2011-2012
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District Principal, Bob Tipton
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Nancy Cline, President James Goode, Vice President Richard Fleming, Secretary Lynn Chaffin, Assistant Secretary Frank Shor, Board Member Nancy Watten, Board Member Karin Webb, Board Member
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
C-FBISD GOAL The Goal of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD is high achievement for all students.
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVES
Supporting Objective 1:
Continuously increase student achievement
CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Creekview Early College Newman Smith R. L. Turner Ranchview
Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff
MIDDLE SCHOOLS Blalack Bush Field Long Perry Polk
Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Blair Blanton Carrollton Central Country Place Davis Farmers Branch Freeman Furneaux Good Kent Landry Las Colinas La Villita McCoy McKamy McLaughlin McWhorter Rainwater Riverchase Rosemeade Sheffield Intermediate Sheffield Primary Stark Strickland Thompson CENTERS
Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system
Mary Grimes Education Center Salazar Transition School Kelly Pre-K Center Huie Education Center CLC Learning Complex
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

BUSINESS/COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES STAFF REPRESENTATIVES Gholson, Diane Gogates, Carol Haislet, Valarie Kemp, Charlotte Kneedler, Mary Lohrs, Christin Mehnert, Lori Meret, Gabby Moore, Sara Rivera, Malena Sanchez, Ofelia Shiver, Rhonda Stout, Susan Wilkes, Sherry Wood, Lori
PARENT REPRESENTATIVES
ADMINISTRATORS Tipton, Bob
CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW : Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date
Chair Signature
Date
Chair Signature
Date
C-FBISD VISION
All students will meet the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) at the satisfactory or advanced level and graduate college-ready and/or workforce ready without remediation.
GRADUATE PROFILE
Graduates of the Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD are:
MISSION
Together with families and community we commit all district resources to guide the learning of each student to graduate as: A responsible individual A passionate life-long learner A complex thinker An effective communicator
Responsible individuals who:

Model productive citizenship Practice successful personal management Demonstrate character values and ethical behavior Appreciate the value of diversity Function effectively as team members
Competent learners who:

Continually pursue and integrate knowledge Achieve academic standards Apply various forms of technology Seek educational and career options Produce quality products
STATEMENT OF BELIEFS
We believe that: The economic, political and societal success of our country depends upon a quality education for all. Diversity strengthens the community and enriches the fabric of our society. It is the responsibility of the entire community to partner in the educational process. Learning occurs best in a safe, orderly and nurturing environment. Belonging to a family, to a school and to a community is vital, and this sense of belonging advances learning. People learn at different rates, have different capacities and that each persons educational path deserves to be valued equally. Learning empowers people to reach their full potential: physically, mentally, socially, and emotionally Everyone is a teacher, everyone is a learner.
Complex thinkers who:

Solve problems critically Create original ideas and solutions Understand and apply systems thinking
Effective communicators who:

Read with understanding Interpret information Interact through listening and speaking Write clearly
TARGET AREAS
Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Must address the 8 components of a Targeted Assisted Program TA 1. TA 2. TA 3. TA 4. TA 5. TA 6. TA 7. TA 8. Resources used to help children meet state academic achievement standards Planning for identified students incorporated into existing school planning Methods and strategies based on scientifically based research TA program is coordinated with and supports regular educational programs Highly qualified teachers Professional Development Increase parental involvement Coordination of federal, state, and local services
Title I School-wide Components (TS)

TS 1. Comprehensive needs assessment TS 2. School-wide reform strategies TS 3. Highly qualified teachers TS 4. Professional development TS 5. Strategies to attract high-quality highly qualified teachers to high-need schools TS 6. Parental involvement TS 7. Assisting preschool children in the transition from early childhood programs TS 8. Measures to include teachers in the decisions regarding use of academic assessments. TS 9. Students difficulties identified on a timely basis TS 10. Coordination and integration between federal, state, and local services.
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF Performance Targets: Employee Job Satisfaction Campus Environment Curriculum and Instruction Student: Attendance Rate Disciplinary Placements SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM Performance Targets: Education Productivity Index (EPI) API SPI Parent Satisfaction Employee Campus Communications
Performance Targets: Academic Performance Index (API) STAAR Satisfactory STAAR Advanced Graduation Rate SAT Mean ACT Mean Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations AYP
Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
THE GOAL OF THE CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH ISD IS HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS
SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 1 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 2 CONTINUOUSY IMPROVE THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT FOR STUDENTS AND STAFF SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 3 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SUPPORTING OBJECTIVE 4 CONTINUOUSLY INCREASE STAKEHOLDER CONFIDENCE AND SUPPORT OF OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM
Supporting Objective 1
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR Satisfactory; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations; AYP
ACTION STRATEGY
Analyze each students TAKS data and develop individual plan for each students success Develop TAKS Tutorials for each content area Integrate electives with core academics for course credit and TAKS preparation
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
Bob Tipton Bob Tipton Bob Tipton
TIMELINE
August 2011 May 2012 August 2011 May 2012 August 2011 May 2012
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
TAKS passing rate TAKS passing rate TAKS passing rate
RESOURCES
TAKS Tutorials, Student TAKS Profiles TAKS Material Classroom materials
TITLE I COMPONENT
TS-1, 2, 9 TS 1, 2 , 9 TS 1, 2, 9
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): STAAR - Advanced; Recognized/Exemplary Distinction Designations
ACTION STRATEGY
Continue the use of computerized programs to evaluate and remediate individual student weaknesses in TAKS Reading, Math, and Science
PERSON RESPONSIBLE
TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE
RESOURCES Aleks, UT TRACKS, Plato, UT ask me, Adopted ELA writing software
TITLE I COMPONENT
Bob Tipton
August 2011 May 2012
TAKS Passing Rate
Ts 1,2,9
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

ACTION STRATEGY PERSON RESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE RESOURCES
60,186.27 in comp. ed. funds, Pre/post unit tests, Individualized curriculum, Community of Learners
TITLE I COMPONENT
Teach the At-Risk student population using a Mastery Learning approach.
Bob Tipton
# of students meeting deadlines and graduating
TS 1,2, 9
Develop an individualized learning plan that provides each student the differentiated time needed to learn the objectives.
Bob Tipton
# of students meeting deadlines and graduating
Pre & post unit tests, community of learners
TS 1, 2, 9
Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

ACTION STRATEGY Register students with Brookhaven as they earn credits needed to graduate. Inform students of SAT/ACT preparation, registration, and testing opportunities. PERSON RESPONSIBLE Malena Rivera Malena Rivera TIMELINE
August 2011 May 2012 August 2011 May 2012
EVALUATION/ MEASURE # of students that register with Brookhaven 3 of students participating
RESOURCES Dedicated computer Printed notices and announcements
TITLE I COMPONENT TS 1, 10 TS 1, 10
Performance Target: Employee: Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work.
ACTION STRATEGY Provide staff development on motivation of underachievers PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE Student progress, attendance at training, teacher survey RESOURCES Identifying and Motivating Underachievers and Motivation to Learn TITLE I COMPONENT TS 4
August 2011
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
ACTION STRATEGY Develop, with the staff, a program for a positive campus atmosphere PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE Teacher survey
RESOURCES Unidentified readings
TITLE I COMPONENT TS 5
Performance Target: Employee: Curriculum and Instruction Teachers work amicably together on common problems.
ACTION STRATEGY PERSON RESPONSIBLE TIMELINE EVALUATION/ MEASURE TAKS passing rates, student progress, PD meeting minutes RESOURCES Scheduled time, Student TAKS data, Student progress data, Individual student work TITLE I COMPONENT
Schedule profession development time once a week for each content department
Bob Tipton
TS 1, 8, 9
Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

ACTION STRATEGY Implement a schedule for students with AM, PM, and All day schedules PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE August 2011 EVALUATION/ MEASURE Student progress and attendance rates RESOURCES TITLE I COMPONENT TS 2
Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

ACTION STRATEGY Continue to address student discipline issues promptly using the student code of conduct PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE Number of student referrals
RESOURCES Student code of conduct
TITLE I COMPONENT TS 6,9
10
Continuously increase operational effectiveness
Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

ACTION STRATEGY Examine campus staffing efficiency and make recommendations to central office PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE Reduce SPI from 10 to 5
RESOURCES
Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

ACTION STRATEGY Investigate instructional strategies that continue to maintain a high level of academic success but allow us to serve more students PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE Maintain EPI of 1
RESOURCES
Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

ACTION STRATEGY Communicate expectations to parents and students, and clarify parental questions through an entry, parent/student, meeting and advisor conferences PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE Parent survey
RESOURCES
11
Performance Target: Employee: Campus Communication School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest
ACTION STRATEGY Continue Advisory program PERSON RESPONSIBLE Bob Tipton TIMELINE
EVALUATION/ MEASURE student progress, parent survey
RESOURCES
TITLE I COMPONENT TS 2, 6, 9
12
ERG Performance Index Education Productivity Index (EPI) Academic Performance Index (API) Staff Productivity Index (SPI)
2010 Rank 1 n/a 10
2011 Target 1 n/a 5
2011 Rank
2012 Target 1 n/a 1
2012 Rank
Employee Opinion Survey Employee Job Satisfaction I would recommend this campus to a friend as a good place to work. Employee Campus Environment I would characterize my campus as having a positive atmosphere.
2011 Result 72% 67% 50% 40%
2012 Target 100% 100% 100% 100%
2012 Result
on common problems.
Employee Curriculum and Instruction Support Teachers work amicably together Employee Campus Communication
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met
2012 Result
School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

AEIS Campus Rating Student Attendance Rate Students with Disciplinary Placements Achieving Quality Together (Parent Survey) Very Satisfied or Satisfied with District
2011 Result Acceptable 0 2011 Result 4.67
2012 Target Acceptable 0 2012 Target 2.00
Percent at Target
2012 Result
13

READING/ELA
MATHEMATICS
2012 % ADV Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Result
2011
% PASS n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2012
% SATIS Target Result n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2011
% COM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
READING/ELA
2011
2012
2011
% COM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. LEP G/T Special Ed All Students
2012 % ADV Result
Student Group
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
SCIENCE WRITING
WRITING 2011
SCIENCE
2012 % ADV Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Result
2011
2012
2011
2012
2011
% COM n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Student Group
2012 % ADV Result
Student Group
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
SOCIAL STUDIES
SOCIAL STUDIES 2011
2012
2011
Student Group
2012 % ADV Result
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target SATISFACTORY ADVANCED
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
MATHEMATICS
14
C-FBISD
Completion Rate

COMPLETION RATE
Class of 2009
Comp Rate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a # of Dropouts n/a n/a
Class of 2010
Comp Rate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a # of Dropouts n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
Class of 2011
Comp Rate Target Results 100 100 100 100 100 100 Target 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dropouts Results
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
n/a
n/a n/a n/a
96.6
6.6
89.1
13.5
100
Dropout Rate
C-FBISD 2008-2009
Rate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE

2009-2010
Rate n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
C-FBISD
Results
ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) Met AYP 2008 2009 2010 2011 Target 2012 Results 2012 yes yes yes yes yes
2010-2011
Student Group
Afr. American Hispanic White Econ. Dis. G/T Special Ed All Students
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS Completion # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
Dropout
15
C-FBISD
Subtests
Critical Reading Mathematics Writing Combined Score Percent Tested 2009
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
SAT MEAN SCORES

2010
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2011
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
2012 Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Results
RESULTS - 2012 PROGRESS TOWARD TARGETS SAT # of Targets Met # of Targets Not Met Percent at Target
ACT
C-FBISD
Subtests
English Mathematics Reading Science Composite Percent Tested 2009
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
ACT MEAN SCORES

2010 2011
17 19 28 17 20 100 2012 Target n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Results
16

Grimes - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Grimes - Campus Improvement Plan 2011-2012

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

C-FBISD VISION:

Mary Grimes Education Center CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN

Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District Principal, Bob Tipton

CARROLLTON-FARMERS BRANCH SCHOOLS

Continuously increase operational effectiveness

CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVES

ADMINISTRATORS Tipton, Bob

CAMPUS PLAN REVIEW : Chair Signature Date Chair Signature Date

Responsible individuals who:

Competent learners who:

Complex thinkers who:

Effective communicators who:

Title I Targeted Assisted (TA)

Title I School-wide Components (TS)

Performance Targets: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

HIGH ACHIEVEMENT FOR ALL STUDENTS

Continuously increase student achievement

Continuously increase student achievement

August 2011 May 2012

TAKS Passing Rate

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): Graduation Rate; AYP

Teach the At-Risk student population using a Mastery Learning approach.

August 2011 May 2012

# of students meeting deadlines and graduating

August 2011 May 2012

# of students meeting deadlines and graduating

Pre & post unit tests, community of learners

Continuously increase student achievement

Performance Target: Academic Performance Index (API): SAT/ACT Mean

EVALUATION/ MEASURE # of students that register with Brookhaven 3 of students participating

RESOURCES Dedicated computer Printed notices and announcements

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

EVALUATION/ MEASURE Teacher survey

RESOURCES Unidentified readings

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

August 2011 May 2012

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Attendance Rate

Continuously improve the learning environment for students and staff

Performance Target: Student: Disciplinary Placements

EVALUATION/ MEASURE Number of student referrals

RESOURCES Student code of conduct

TITLE I COMPONENT TS 6,9

Continuously increase operational effectiveness

Performance Target: Staff Productivity Index (SPI)

EVALUATION/ MEASURE Reduce SPI from 10 to 5

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Education Productivity Index (EPI); API; SPI

EVALUATION/ MEASURE Maintain EPI of 1

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

Performance Target: Parent Satisfaction: Achieving Quality Together

EVALUATION/ MEASURE Parent survey

Continuously increase stakeholder confidence and support of our school system

EVALUATION/ MEASURE student progress, parent survey

2010 Rank 1 n/a 10

2011 Target 1 n/a 5

2012 Target 1 n/a 1

2011 Result 72% 67% 50% 40%

2012 Target 100% 100% 100% 100%

School has system of communication thats open, regular and honest.

2011 Result Acceptable 0 2011 Result 4.67