Payment Dispute One of dispute faced in our site is form work area in our site 3200 m but the

sub contractor asked 5100m. In this case 3200m2 area is up to level that required to do concrete work but to do the concrete work contractor had add extended the form work. Extended form works are cost of contractor for this project. This case our company director appoints a common person and solve this problems. This person is known as in law as Arbitrator. In this case arbitrator hear the problem facing by contractor from the client. Problem is client do not want pay the extra area that contractor has prepaid to do the concrete work. Money spend on form work has big loss to contractor so contractor want client to pay. Arbitrator was knowledge of the dispute subject and contraction industry. So this case had easily solve. Arbitrator heard both parties comment and arbitrator told that do the concrete work need extra form work area. So that cost is necessary cost to construction work so client have pay. Client agreed pay 5000m2 cost and contractor also accept that. This case solve by third party means arbitrator. Arbitrator fee are divided to both parties as their agreed before resolution. Bills Dispute This is the one of dispute, happen with consultant farm. Quantity Surveyor of Rupan engineering pvt (Ltd ) sends their interim bills to client on 05th of every month. After 14 days, receiving the bill from rupan engineering, the consultant Quantity Surveyor correcting the bill and certifying contractors amount whether its reasonable or not. But every month they are founding high amount in interim bill from contractors and consultant QS coming to the site arguing regarding this problem. Mainly this problem was decision between consultant Qs, contractor Qs and director of rupan Company. Client did not want to pay the amount that the contractor appeal and client is ready paying only less amount from that interim bill. This mean only amount that consultant certified in interim bill. At this point dispute occurred. This was big dispute at the site. As previous dispute resolution method is used to solve this dispute. That means arbitrator has act in resolution. Arbitrator hears the decision between both parties. After hears both parties requirement arbitrator come to conclusion. Arbitrator told that appeal amount little bit high but consultant approved amount is not a correct amount. 95% of appeal amount is correct amount have receive from client as contractor expense plus profit and overhead. 5% should be deducted from interim bill amount. Both parties agreed

with arbitrator conclusion And it solved the within one week. It show that arbitrator method need less time compare to court system. Arbitrator fee is divided to both parties equally.
In this dispute solving for Arbitration method

Note: Shazim pls this dispute u will change own writes down (modify)