Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
system. A sudden change in the load on the system would represent a disturbance input to the system. Measuring Transmitter: The measuring Transmitter or sensor senses the value of the controlled variable and converts it into a suitable signal. This may be a passive device that converts the controlled variable into a suitable signal for input to the error detector (example a potentiometric displacement sensor used to convert the angular displacement of a motor shaft into a proportional voltage signal. In a process-control environment, the measuring transmitter usually represents two components, a primary sensing element and a signal transducer (or signal converter). The Controller: The controller includes the error detector and a unit that implements the control modes. The error detector computes the difference between the measured value of the controlled variable and the desired value (or setpoint). The difference is referred to as the error signal. The control modes convert the error into a control action that adjusts the controller output signal in a direction that will tend to reduce the error. The three most common control modes are the proportional mode (P), the integral mode (I), and the derivative mode (D). Manipulating Element: The manipulating element uses the controller output to regulate the manipulated variable and usually consists of two parts. The first part is called an actuator, and the second part is called the final controlling element. The actuator translates the controller output into an action on the final controlling element, and the final controlling element directly changes the value of the manipulated variable. For example, an Electro-pneumatic convert I/P would convert the controller output current signal into a proportional pneumatic signal that could be used to drive the final control element representing a pneumatic control valve, the valve stem position may be used to adjust the input flow rate of a fluid (manipulated variable) to maintain a particular liquid level (controlled variable).
Figure 1
Figure 2 Liquid level control system Closed-loop control systems. In practice, the terms feedback control and closed-loop control are used interchangeably. A close-loop system maintains a prescribed relationship between the output(control variable) and the reference input (setpoint) by comparing them and using the difference (error signal) as a means of control. The controller output adjustment is computed in a way to drive the output of the system to a desired value, hence reducing the error. Feedback control systems are not limited to engineering but can be found in various nonengineering fields as well. The human body, for instance, is a highly advanced feedback control system. Both body temperature and blood pressure are kept constant by means of physiological feedback. In fact, feedback performs a vital function: It makes the human body relatively insensitive to external disturbances, thus enabling it to function properly in a changing environment.
Open-loop control systems. Those systems in which the output has no effect on the control action are called open-loop control systems. In other words, in an open-loop control system the output is neither measured nor fed back for comparison with the input. One practical example is a washing machine. Soaking, washing, and rinsing in the washer operate on a time basis. The machine does not measure the output signal, that is, cleanliness of the clothes. In any open-loop control system the output is not compared with the reference input. Thus, to each reference input there corresponds a fixed operating condition; as a resuIt, the accuracy of the system depends on calibration. In the presence of disturbances, an open-loop control system will not perform the desired task. Open-loop control can be used, in practice, only if the relationship between the input and output is known and if there are neither internal nor external disturbances. Clearly, such systems are not feedback control systems. Note that any control system that operates on a time basis is open loop. For instance, traffic control by means of signals operated on a time basis is another example of open-loop control. Closed-loop versus open-loop control systems. An advantage of the closed loop control system is the fact that the use of feedback makes the system response relatively insensitive to external disturbances and internal variations in system parameters. It is thus possible to use relatively inaccurate and inexpensive components to obtain the accurate control of a given plant, whereas doing, is impossible in the open-loop case. From the point of view of stability, the open-loop control system is easier to build because system stability is not a major problem. On the other hand, stability is a major problem in the closed-loop control system, which may tend to overcorrect errors that can cause oscillations of constant or changing amplitude. Its therefore advisable that for systems in which the inputs are known ahead of time and in which there are no disturbances the use open-loop control is most appropriate. Closed-loop control systems have advantages only when unpredictable disturbances and/or unpredictable variations in system components are present. Typically, the close-loop control system will cost more than an open-loop system.
physically remote from hazardous and aggressive environments and can be operated in more closely monitored and controlled conditions.
Figure 3
A major disadvantage of pneumatic systems is the cost of the pneumatic lines between the process and the control room. Each control loop required two signal lines: one from the measuring transmitter to the controller, the other from the controller to the control valve. In large plants, these lines measured hundreds, even thousands of feet long. The 5
distance is limited by the speed of response, which quadruples with doubling the distance. Pneumatic signals travel at about 1000 ft per second. A process loop located 500 ft from the control room would suffer a 1 -second delay in the control loop - a 1/2second delay from the measuring transmitter to the controller and another 1/2-second delay from the controller to the control valve. The transmission delay in the long pneumatic signal lines can impair the quality of the controls achievable. Finally, pneumatic transmission Systems require a dry, regulated air supply. Condensed moisture in the pipe-works at subzero temperatures or small solid contaminants can block the small passages within pneumatic instruments and cause loss of accuracy and failure. One advantage of Pneumatic instruments are that they are intrinsically safe and can therefore be used in hazardous areas. They provide protection against electrical power failure, since systems employing air storage or turbine driven compressors can continue to provide measurement and control during power failure. A second advantage of such system was that pneumatic signals could directly interface with control valves which are pneumatically operated and thus do not require the electrical-pneumatic converters required by electrical telemetry systems, although they do suffer from the difficulty of being difficult to interface to data loggers.
(a)
(b) Figure 4
The advantage of using 4 -20 mA instead of 0-20 mA is that the use of a live zero enables instrument or fine faults to be detected. In the 4-20 mA system zero value is represented by 4 mA and failure is indicated by 0 mA. It is possible to use a 4-20 mA system as a two wire transmission system in which both the power and the signal are transmitted along the same wire as shown n Figure 5. The 4 mA standing current is used to power the remote instrumention and the transmitter. With 24 V drive the maximum power available to the remote station is 96mw.
Figure 5
setting or resetting the zero and span, details of the location and application, and running diagnostic routines to give warning of malfunctioning, can also be implemented. The term 'intelligent' has come to be used to identify such transmitters.
Figure 6 If the analogue data is converted to a digital signals at the remote locations, all communication with the central unit will be digital. Digital signal are transmitted over transmission lines using either parallel or serial communication. For long-distance communication serial communication is preferred method. Because of the high capacitance of the twisted-pair and coaxial cables the length of line over which digital signal can be transmitted using standard digital output (0 5.0V) from TTL devices, is typically limited to a length of 3m at 2Mbits/s. In order to drive digitals signals over long lines special purpose line drivers and receiver circuits are available. Modems are used to overcome the limitations of the public telephone lines, the baseband signal is used to modulate a carrier wave which is then transmitted down the line. The three basic modulation schemes illustrated in Figure 7 are special case of the general modulation schemes looked at earlier. These are amplitude-shift keying ASK, frequency shift keying FSK and Phase shift keying PSK. FSK is generally preferred for low-speed applications ( data rate 1200bits/s). ASK and PSK are most popular for higher speed data transmission.
The model 3051C transmitters shown in Figure 6 communicates via the HART protocol, which uses the industry standard Bell 202 frequency shift keying (FSK) technique to perform digital data transmission. The digitally modulated carrier is superimposed on the 4-20 mA output signal. The Rosemount implementation of this technique allows simultaneous communications and output signalling without compromising the integrity of the loop. The Hart protocol allows the user easy access to the configuration, test and format capabilities of the Model 3051C.
ASK transmission Binary 0 - transmitted using sinusoidal carrier wave of Amplitude A1 Binary 1 - transmitted using carrier of Amplitude A2 Note that A1 < A2. FSK transmission Binary 0 - transmitted using sinusoidal carrier wave of frequency f1 Binary 1 - transmitted using carrier of frequency f2 Note that f1 < f2. PSK Transmission Binary 0 -transmitted using a sinusoidal carrier wave with zero phase Binary 1 -transmitted using a anti-phase sinusoidal carrier (phase angle = 180 deg.s)
Figure 7
10
Example Suppose the temperature range of 20 C to 120 C is linearly represented by the standard current range of 4 to 20 mA. What current will result from 66 C? What temperature does 6.5 mA represent?
3.0
Process control began with sensing elements connected directly to recording controllers, which, in turn, were connected directly to the control valve. The control loop intelligence was distributed near the process it controlled. This distribution of loop intelligence produced good control of individual process variables; but operators could not adequately monitor all of the control loops, especially in spread-out processes such as oil refineries, paper mills, steel mills, and chemical plants. Control engineers could only dream of advanced control concepts, because there was no way to use inputs from several process variables to improve the control of critical variables in the process. The digital computer entered the process control scene in 1959, the advent of this technology provided the control engineer with a tool to implement advanced control concepts. The input of all process variables into the computer memory meant that every process variable was available for use in a control algorithm. Figure 8 shows three different schemes for employing computers in industry.
11
Figure 8 One particular method of using computers for control was to replace the analog controllers with a single large digital computer. The term direct digital control (DDC) was used to describe this type of system. This meant the conversion of the transmitted analog signals into digital format using ADCs for presentation to the computer system. Reliability was a problem, however. If the computer failed, the entire process was out of control. This happened with enough regularity that some form of backup was in order. One backup scheme used a standby computer that was ready to take over in case the primary computer failed. In extremely critical applications such as the space program, two backup computers were used. Another method used analog controllers for backup in case the DDC computer failed, see Figure 8c. Yet another method used analog controllers for loop control with the digital computer used in a supervisory role, see Figure 9.
12
Figure 9 The microprocessor gave us the means to move the control loop back to the plant floor and the ability to communicate with this distributed intelligence. We can have the short loop advantages of distributed control and the fully informed operator of a centralized control system. Most modern control system therefore incorporate multiple control system architecture and hierarchy as shown in the hierarchical computer based control system block diagram above. Figure 10 gives an example of a fully integrated distributed control system consisting of both process control and machine control. The path that crosses the top and runs down the left side represents the communication network. Local control units can handle continuous processes, batch processes, and robotic work cells. In addition, other units, such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs), can be interfaced with the communications network. Local operators, central control room operators, plant maintenance, plant engineering, and plant management all have access to all the information via color display and keyboards. 13
Figure 10
14