Software Module Design & Test Report - 33.5.7, 33-2, 33-4 - v2

STONECUTTERS BRIDGE Section 33 Wind and Structural Health Monitoring System (HY/2002/26) SOFTWARE MODULE DESIGN AND TEST
T REPORT FOR DATA PROCESSING AND MANAGEMENT (REPORT TOOLS) OF WIND MEASUREMENT (LOGICAL DESIGN) (PS CLAUSES 33.5, 33.5.7, APPENDIX 33-2 & 33-4)
VERSION NO
Employer
Highways Department, The Government of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited Maeda-Hitachi-Yokogawa-Hsin Chong Joint Venture (MHYHJV) Lucky Engineering Co., Ltd. (LEC)
Engineer Contractor Sub-contractor
: : :
HY/2002/26 Section 33 Wind And Structural Health Monitoring System Software Module Design and Test Report Stonecutters Bridge
Table of Contents
1.INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................2 1.1.PURPOSE .......................................................................................................................................................2 1.2.ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................................................................................................2 1.3.DEFINITION .....................................................................................................................................................3 1.4.REFERENCE ...................................................................................................................................................3 2.OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................................................4 2.1.GENERAL .......................................................................................................................................................4 2.2.CORRESPONDING SPECIFICATIONS ..................................................................................................................4 3.DATA PRE-PROCESSING ................................................................................................................................5 4.DATA POST-PROCESSING................................................................................................................................8 5.DATA REPORTING ...........................................................................................................................................10 6.MODULE TESTING...........................................................................................................................................17 7.CONCLUSION OF MODULE TESTING ...........................................................................................................18 8.REQUIRED INFORMATION..............................................................................................................................18 APPENDIX A: CALCULATION REFERENCES ..................................................................................................19 APPENDIX B: TESTING RESULTS ....................................................................................................................23
Page 1 of 37
1.
Introduction
1.1. Purpose This Software Module Design Proposal and Testing Plan is produced for Stonecutters Bridge Wind And Structural Health Monitoring System (WASHMS) as planned in the Software Quality Assurance Plan (SQAP) under submission CSF-OT/005786 and designed according submission CSF-OT/009188, Software Function Design Proposal for Data Processing and Management (Report Tools) (Conceptual Design). This proposal shall be read together with the previous submitted proposals. This proposal delivers the module requirement and design direction for the coding of the customized modules in according to the Functional Design Proposal and PS Clauses listed in Section 1.4 of this proposal. It can be considered as the logical design stage in the scope of the customized modules. 1.2. Abbreviations The following abbreviations will be sued in this document: Ane Acc Bar Cor-Cell DAU DPCS-1 Dsp FE function ID GUI Hyg Rfg PS33 RFI SFRDS-MATLAB SHDMS SHES Anemometer Accelerometer Barometer Corrosion Cell Data Acquisition Unit Data Processing and Control System -1 Displacement Transducers or Tensio Magnetic Sensor Finite Element Functional Identification Number Graphical User Interface Hygrometer Rainfall gauge Particular Specification Section 33 Request-for-Information Software Functional Requirement and Design Specification for Bridge Operation Display Using MATLAB Structural Health Data Management System Structural Health Evaluation System Page 2 of 37
SQAP Str Tmp WIM 1.3. Definition
Software Quality Assurance Plan Strain Gauge Temperature Sensor Weight in Motion Sensor
In this document, the following words and expressions shall have the meanings hereby assigned and expected where the context otherwise requires: Engineer HyD Ove Arup & Partners Hong Kong Limited Highways Department The Government of The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Specification Main Contractor Sub Contractor MATLAB IBM DB2 Particular Specification of Contract No. HY/2002/26 Stonecutters Bridge Maeda Hitachi Yokogawa Hsin Chong Joint Venture (MHYHJV) Lucky Engineering Co., Ltd (LEC) - WASHMS Sub-Contractor MATLAB is a numerical computing environment and programming language. Created by The MathWorks, Inc DB2 is one of IBM's lines of relational database management system (data server) software products within IBM's broader Information Management Software line. The software is installed in SHDMS submitted under submission CSF-OT/006555. A data acquisition software package created by DEWETRON A solver and platform-independent CAE program providing advanced analysis created by Dynamic Design Solution
DEWESoft FEMtools
1.4. Reference PS33 Clause 33.5.0-1 PS33 Clause 33.6.5.1 PS33 Clause 33.5.7 PS33 Appendix 33-2 and Appendix 33-4 Software Quality Assurance Plan (CSF-OT/005786) Software Functional Design Proposal (CSF-OT/009188)
Page 3 of 37
2.
Overview
2.1. General The pre-processing modules run in DAU, the post-processing modules run in DPCS-1 and the reporting modules run in SHES are included in this proposal. The details of each customized module will be discussed in Section 3, 4 and 5 of this proposal. The flow chat of the data movement is illustrated in Figure 1.1. For each functional step within the data flow path, they have been added an unique functional identification number (function ID) for future referencing.
Figure 2.1 General Data Flowchart
2.2. Corresponding Specifications According the Section 2.2 from Software Functional Design Proposal, the data flow and the required data processing from DAU to SHES for each sensory instrument according to their sensors groups has been described. During the Module Design, those tables have been revised base on the actually development situation. Those input & output data flow and the function ID are referred to the tables of previous submitted CSF-OT/9188 in details: Sensor Groups Sensor Types DAUs (Pre-Processing) Ane U-Ane-3D U-Ane-2D P-Ane Table 1a-1 Table 1b-1 Table 1c-1 DPCS-1 (Post-Processing) Table 1a-2 Table 1b-2 Table 1c-2 SHES (Reporting Tools) Table 1a-3 Table 1b-3 Table 1c-3
Page 4 of 37
3.
Data Pre-processing The measured (raw) data from the SS will be under pre-processing once it recorded by DAUs. As the module design for the function stated at Tables 2a-1, 2b-1 and 2c-1, the I/O data flow chat for anemometers are presented in Figures 3.1a, 3.1b and 3.1c respectively. The Figure indicates the data flow from the raw data signal to the pre-processed data, these processes will be done by the formula function tools in DEWESoft (see Figure 3.2), which is the data acquisition software installed with DAUs.
Figure 3.1a Data Flowchart of U-Ane-3D at DAU
Page 5 of 37
Figure 3.1b Data Flowchart of U-Ane-2D at DAU
Page 6 of 37
Figure 3.1c Data Flowchart of P-Ane at DAU
Page 7 of 37
Figure 3.2 Formula setup in DEWESoft
4.
Data Post-processing The pre-processed data from DAUs will undergo post-processing at DPCS-1. As the module design for the function stated at Tables 1a-2, 1b-2 and 1c-2, the I/O data flow chat for temperature sensors are presented in Figures 4.1a, 4.1b and 4.1c. The Figure indicates the data flow from the pre-processed data signal to the post-processed data, these processes have been done by the MATLAB function tools in DPCS-1, which is an integrated software installed with DPCS-1. The post-processing will be carried out automatically every 3 hours after collected the raw data and the pre-processed data.
Page 8 of 37
Figure 4.1a Data Flowchart for U-Ane-3D at DPCS-1
Figure 4.1b Data Flowchart for U-Ane-2D at DPCS-1
Page 9 of 37
Figure 4.1c Data Flowchart for P-Ane at DPCS-1
5.
Data Reporting In accordance to PS Clauses 33.5.8, the requirement for SHES of WASHMS is for reporting the pre-processed and post-processed results. The requirement specified as follows. The inputs of the reporting MATLAB modules are either getting from the Historical Database, Real-Time Database or other specified storage location. User can select the specific period of time and locations of sensor at SHES through the web-based GUI provided by IBM DB2 of SHDMS (the GUI will be submitted separately under the submission of module design specification of SHDMS ref: CSF-OT/009523). Then, the selected data from SHDMS will be passed to the MATLAB modules at SHES and the reporting process will be carried out. The overall reporting tools are utilized for generated the Survey Report, Detailed Report and Bridge Rating Report. The linkage between the web interface to the MATLAB modules should refer to the separate submission for SHDMS, Report Tools Module Design Specification. The individual MATLAB modules are presented in the Figures 5.1 to 5.11. It is noted that the MATLAB modules are no longer dependent on the sensor types, but only on the sensor group. Thus these modules can be read in general for U-Ane-3D, U-Ane-2D and P-Ane.
Page 10 of 37
Figure 5.1 Data Flow for the MATLAB Module Mat-W001 (wind-shes-01), Mat-W002 (wind-shes-02), Mat-W003 (wind-shes-03) & Mat-W004 (wind-shes-04)
Figure 5.2 Data Flow for the MATLAB Module Mat-W005 (wind-shes-05)
Page 11 of 37
Page 12 of 37
Page 13 of 37
Total Kinetic Power (Column Vector)
Total Kinetic Power (Column Vector)
Sampling Rate (Scalar)
Header (Cell Vector)
Averaged the power
Plot averaged Total Kinetic Power series
Page 14 of 37
Page 15 of 37
Page 16 of 37
Derived force (Column Vector)
R(Column Vector)
Sampling Rate of the Rdata (Scalar)
Sampling Rate of the force data (Scalar)
Plot force against R-
Buffering force (Column Vector)
R(Column Vector)
Sampling Rate of the Rdata (Scalar)
Sampling Rate of the force data (Scalar)
Plot force against R-
6.
Module Testing Since the MATLAB modules will be installed in SHES and triggered by a sub-module written by Java, or by LabVIEW during the final integration, in order to facilitate the testing and debugging processes, the following testing plan has been created. The testing philosophy is illustrated in Figure 6.1. Page 17 of 37
Figure 6.1 Testing Plan
The modules have been tested using the WTIFM wind data. The individual testing result has been attached in Appendix B.
7.
Conclusion of Module Testing Based on the result plots in Appendix B, we can see the testing results are same as the results submitted under the WTIFM bi-monthly report, if any. As the report shows the reasonable figures, we can conclude that the overall performance of the wind modules is satisfactory.
8.
Required Information During the module development, there are several items that required additional information or advices from the Engineer or from the sensor suppliers. A separate form of Request-for-Information ref. RFI/000914 was submitted, if appropriate. The affected items are listed as follows: PS 33.5.7 5th row point 6: Please advice the detail expression of the formula of the ESDU Spectra. PS 33.5.7 6th row point 6: Please advice the comparison method and the values of the response from the design and wind tunnel testing. Page 18 of 37
Appendix A: Calculation References The formulas for the calculation of the monitoring parameters are referenced to the PS Appendix 33-2, which has been quoted as follows: Statistical Calculations 1.1 Time 10 min Name Mean Definition
x=
1 f sT
x
i
10 min 10 min
Maximum Minimum
x max = max{xi } x min = min{xi }

xGust = max{abs ( x x )}3 sec max{abs ( x x )}10 min
3 sec, 10 min
Gust (Peak)
10 min
Standard Deviation
x =
1 f sT
(x
i
x) 2
10 min 1.2
RMS
RMS =
1 f sT
x
i
2 i
Wind Calculations
The measured wind speeds shall be processed for calculating dynamic wind effects based on the dynamic characteristics specified below. All wind speeds measured by sensors SON2 - SON11 shall have the XYZ speed of the anemometer boom measured by ACCS1 - ACCS10 subtracted to rule out movements of the boom. The accelerometer signal shall be integrated once to have the measured signal in the velocity domain.
Characteristic mean wind velocity and velocity pressure for wind

For the bridge in-service without highway load and for the bridge during construction, the characteristic 1-hour mean wind velocity profile V(z) for wind shall be taken as
z V ( z ) = 35 10
0.19
When the wind approach is dominated by open ocean fetch (South Westerly directions) When the wind is approaching over complex hilly or built-up terrain (Westerly to Page 19 of 37
South Easterly directions) the mean wind speed profile is modified as follows
z V ( z ) = 0.66 35 10
0.29
The characteristic 1-hour mean wind velocity pressure q(z) shall be taken as:
q( z ) =
1 V 2 ( z) 2
Power Spectra
The power spectra of the longitudinal (u), lateral (v) and vertical (w) turbulence components are defined according to the von Krmn spectral model. Along-wind component (u):
f S uu ( f )
4 =
Lu f V10 ( z )
5/6
u2
2 Lu f 1 + 70.8 V ( z) 10
Cross-wind lateral (v) and vertical (w):

2 Lv , w f Lv , w f 4 1 + 755 V ( z) V10 ( z ) 10 f S vv , ww ( f ) = 2 11 / 6 2 v,w L f 1 + 283 v , w V ( z) 10
where the parameters in the expression are:
i Sii(f) f i V10(z) Li
turbulence component (u, v or w) Wind energy spectrum for turbulence component i Frequency [Hz] Standard deviation of wind speed for turbulence component i 10 min. mean wind speed at level z
z Li = Li 50 50
0.45
Page 20 of 37
Length scales, all wind directions :Lu50 = 160 m, Lv50 = Lu50/3, Lw50 = Lu50/6
The length scales quoted above are derived from analysis of one typhoon
event and 6 monsoon events hitting the CT8 field measurement site from North Easterly directions. The most significant observation is that the length scales increases with increasing height above ground level. Preliminary wind tunnel results indicate that the length scales does not change significantly as function of wind direction.
Turbulence Intensity
The turbulence intensity I of the longitudinal (u), vertical (w) and lateral (v) turbulence components at height z above ground are given by the following expressions:
Ii =
i
V10 ( z )
For the along-wind Iu component the following expression can be derived
10 = 0.21 Iu = V10 ( z ) z
0.19
Corresponding to an approach dominated by open ocean fetch (South Westerly directions). u is assumed to be constant with height based on Iu equal to 14.5% at 70 m height above sea level inferred from the Waglan Island data reproduced in the review of the Structures Design Manual. When the wind is approaching over complex hilly or built-up terrain (Westerly to South Easterly directions) the turbulence intensity profile is modified as follows:
10 Iu = = 0.37 V10 ( z ) z
0.29
For vertical and lateral turbulence intensities of the wind the following is assumed based on analysis of Typhoon data recorded at the Tsing Ma bridge: Iv = 1.00 Iu and Iw = 0.75 Iu
Page 21 of 37
Coherence
The coherence, which defines the statistical dependency between the turbulence components at 2 different points, is given by the following expression:
D f coh = exp C V10 ( z )

The parameter C, the decay factor, is equal to 8 (for lateral coherences). The parameter D is the distance between the 2 points and f is the frequency. In table below the values of the decay factor C for all 9 coherences is listed. Values of the decay factor C to be used in the calculations Lateral separation Longitudinal turbulence component Cross wind turbulence component Vertical turbulence component 8 8 4 Longitudinal separation 2 4 4 Vertical separation 8 4 8
Page 22 of 37
Appendix B: Testing Results Module ID File Name Typical Result Satisfaction
MAT-W001
Wind_rose
Accepted
MAT-W002
Wind_rose
Accepted
Page 23 of 37
MAT-W003
Wind_rose
Accepted
MAT-W004
Wind_rose
Accepted
MAT-T005
Wind_incidence
Accepted
Page 24 of 37
Page 25 of 37
MAT-W006
Turb_inten
Accepted
Page 26 of 37
MAT-W007
Time_series_plot
Accepted
Page 27 of 37
Page 28 of 37
Page 29 of 37
Page 30 of 37
Page 31 of 37
Page 32 of 37
MAT-W008
WSpectrum
Accepted
Page 33 of 37
Mat-W009
TKE1
Accepted
Page 34 of 37
Mat-W010
TKE2
Accepted
Page 35 of 37
Mat-W011
Wind_contour
Accepted
Mat-W012
Wind_AVD
Accepted
Mat-W013
Wind_SF
Accepted
Page 36 of 37
Mat-W014
Wind_Dsp
Accepted
Page 37 of 37

Software Module Design & Test Report - 33.5.7, 33-2, 33-4 - v2

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Software Module Design & Test Report - 33.5.7, 33-2, 33-4 - v2

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

STONECUTTERS BRIDGE Section 33 Wind and Structural Health Monitoring System (HY/2002/26) SOFTWARE MODULE DESIGN AND TEST

Engineer Contractor Sub-contractor

SQAP Str Tmp WIM 1.3. Definition

Figure 2.1 General Data Flowchart

Figure 3.1a Data Flowchart of U-Ane-3D at DAU

Figure 3.1b Data Flowchart of U-Ane-2D at DAU

Figure 3.1c Data Flowchart of P-Ane at DAU

Figure 3.2 Formula setup in DEWESoft

Figure 4.1a Data Flowchart for U-Ane-3D at DPCS-1

Figure 4.1b Data Flowchart for U-Ane-2D at DPCS-1

Figure 4.1c Data Flowchart for P-Ane at DPCS-1

Total Kinetic Power (Column Vector)

Sampling Rate (Scalar)

Header (Cell Vector)

Averaged the power

Plot averaged Total Kinetic Power series

Derived force (Column Vector)

Header (Cell Vector)

Sampling Rate of the Rdata (Scalar)

Sampling Rate of the force data (Scalar)

Plot force against R-

Buffering force (Column Vector)

Header (Cell Vector)

Sampling Rate of the Rdata (Scalar)

Sampling Rate of the force data (Scalar)

Plot force against R-

Figure 6.1 Testing Plan

x max = max{xi } x min = min{xi }

Characteristic mean wind velocity and velocity pressure for wind

Cross-wind lateral (v) and vertical (w):

where the parameters in the expression are:

For the along-wind Iu component the following expression can be derived

D f coh = exp C V10 ( z )

Appendix B: Testing Results Module ID File Name Typical Result Satisfaction

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi