0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
14 vues5 pages
Roman's election as governor oI Bataan on May 14, 2001 / allegedly being contrary to Art. X, SS8 oI the Constitution. No such oIIicial shall serve Ior more than three consecutive terms. The Court voted 8 to 7 to DISMISS the petition: ConsLllnuous and an unlnLerrupLed servlce before Lhe proscrlpLlon appllesT1herefore
Roman's election as governor oI Bataan on May 14, 2001 / allegedly being contrary to Art. X, SS8 oI the Constitution. No such oIIicial shall serve Ior more than three consecutive terms. The Court voted 8 to 7 to DISMISS the petition: ConsLllnuous and an unlnLerrupLed servlce before Lhe proscrlpLlon appllesT1herefore
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Roman's election as governor oI Bataan on May 14, 2001 / allegedly being contrary to Art. X, SS8 oI the Constitution. No such oIIicial shall serve Ior more than three consecutive terms. The Court voted 8 to 7 to DISMISS the petition: ConsLllnuous and an unlnLerrupLed servlce before Lhe proscrlpLlon appllesT1herefore
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
94-95 (won in Recall); 95-94; 98-01; 01(questioned)
Roman's election as governor oI Bataan on May 14, 2001 allegedly being contrary to Art. X, 8 oI the Constitution, which provides that: The term oI oIIice oI elective local oIIicials, except barangay oIIicials, which shall be determined by law, shall be three years and no such oIIicial shall serve Ior more than three consecutive terms. Voluntary renunciation oI the oIIice Ior any length oI time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity oI his service Ior the Iull term Ior which he was elected. AIter due deliberation, the Court voted 8 to 7 to DISMISS the petition: ConsLlLuLlon envlslons a conLlnuous and an unlnLerrupLed servlce for Lhree full Lerms before Lhe proscrlpLlon applles1herefore noL belng a full Lerm a recall Lerm should noL be counLed or used as a basls for Lhe dlsquallflcaLlon wheLher served prlor (as ln Lhls case) or subsequenL (as ln Lhe 5octotes case) Lo Lhe nlneyear full LhreeLerm llmlL perlod from !une 28 1994 Lo !une 30 1993 durlng whlch respondenL Leonardo 8 8oman served as governor of 8aLaan by vlrLue of a recall elecLlon held ln 1993 should noL be counLed Slnce on May 14 2001 respondenL had prevlously served as governor of 8aLaan for only Lwo consecuLlve Lerms (1993 1998 and 19982001) hls elecLlon on LhaL day was acLually only hls Lhlrd Lerm for Lhe same poslLlon a recall Lerm should noL be consldered as one full Lerm because a conLrary lnLerpreLaLlon would ln effecL cuL shorL Lhe elecLed offlclals servlce Lo less Lhan nlne years and shorLchange hls consLlLuenLs 1he deslre Lo prevenL monopoly of pollLlcal power should be balanced agalnsL Lhe need Lo uphold Lhe voLers obvlous preference ulSSLn1 a recall Lerm consLlLuLes one Lerm and LhaL LoLally Lo lgnore a recall Lerm ln deLermlnlng Lhe LhreeLerm llmlL would allow local offlclals Lo serve for more Lhan nlne consecuLlve years conLrary Lo Lhe manlfesL lnLenL of Lhe framers of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon CSMLNA (Cebu Gov) v CCMLLLC consLlLuLlonallLy of 8epubllc AcL 7036 An AcL rovldlng for Lhe naLlonal and Local LlecLlons ln 1992 ave Lhe Way for Synchronlzed and SlmulLaneous LlecLlons 8eglnnlng 1993 vlolaLes Lhe mandaLe of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon for Lhe holdlng of synchronlzed naLlonal and local elecLlons on Lhe second Monday of May 1992 by holdlng local elecLlons nov 1992 Lhus offlclals shall hold over beyond !une 30 1992 whlch ln effecL shorLens Lhe Lerm or Lenure of offlce of local offlclals Lo be elecLed' Article XVIII, Sections 2 and 5 (Transitory Provisions) oI the 1987 Constitution, which reads Sec. 2. The Senators, Members oI the House oI Representatives and the local oIIicials Iirst elected under this Constitution shall serve until noon of June 30, 1992. Sec. 5. The six-year term oI the incumbent President and Vice President elected in the February 7, 1986 election is, for purposes of synchroni:ation of elections, hereby extended to noon of June 30, 1992.The Iirst regular elections Ior President and Vice-President under this Constitution shall be held on the second Monday oI May, 1992. LvldenL LhaL Lerms of offlce of SenaLors Members of Lhe Pouse of 8epresenLaLlves Lhe local offlclals Lhe resldenL and Lhe vlceresldenL have been synchronlzed Lo end on Lhe same hour daLe and year noon of !une 30 1992 1haL Lhe elecLlon for SenaLors Members of Lhe Pouse of 8epresenLaLlves and Lhe local offlclals (under Sec 2 ArL xvlll) wlll have Lo be synchronlzed wlLh Lhe elecLlon for resldenL and vlce resldenL 8epubllc AcL 7036 provldes for Lwo (2) separaLe elecLlons ln 1992 clearly vlolaLlve of Lhe ConsLlLuLlon because lL provldes for Lhe holdlng of a desynchronlzed elecLlon CLher vlolaLlons Constitution which provides that the local oIIicial Iirst elected under the Constitution shall serve until noon oI June 30, 1992. But under Sec. 3 oI RA 7056, these incumbent local oIIicials shall hold over beyond June 30, 1992 and shall serve until their successors shall have been duly elected and qualiIied; Section 8, Article X oI the Constitution which provides that:The term oI oIIice oI elective local oIIicials, except barangay oIIicials which shall be determined by law shall be three years and no such oIIicial shall serve Ior more than three consecutive terms. Those to be elected will be serving Ior only two years and seven months, that is, Irom November 30, 1992 to June 30, 1995, not three years as provided Ior by the Constitution. Section 9, Article IX oI the Constitution provides that: Unless otherwise Iixed by the Commission in special cases, the election period shall commence ninety days beIore the day oI election and shall end thirty days thereaIter. RA 7056 provides Ior a diIIerent campaign period AGUS1IN 8 DCCLNA peLlLloner versus 1nL SANGGUNIANG ANLALAWIGAN CI LAS1LkN SAMAk GCVLkNCk LU1GAkDC 8 8Ak8C VICL GCVLkNCk CAMILC A CAMLNICk1L 8CAkD MLM8LkS MAkCCS ALIDC NCNA1C GLkNA ISMALL knC MAkCLLINC C LI8ANAN NICCLAS IMLN1LL GLNLkCSC U and A11 SCCkA1LS 8 ALAk Luls 8 CaplLo who had been elecLed Lo and was servlng as a member of Lhe Sanggunlang anlalawlgan of LasLern Samar (SLS) dled ln offlce uocena was appolnLed Lo succeed hlm The appointment was issued on November 19, 1990,
by Secretary Luis T. Santos oI the
Department oI Local Government Docena then Look hls oaLh of offlce before Speaker 8amon v MlLra of Lhe Pouse of 8epresenLaLlves on november 22 1990 2 and assumed offlce as member of Lhe SLS 1hen Alar was appolnLed also by SecreLary Luls 1 SanLos Lo Lhe poslLlon already occupled by uocena SLS passed 8esoluLlon no 73 S recognlzlng Alar raLher Lhan uocena as Lhe leglLlmaLe successor of Lhe laLe 8oard Member CaplLo SLS was ln effecL reversed by SecreLary SanLos when he addressed a recall leLLer Lo Alar 1hls acLlon was afflrmed ln a llrsL lndorsemenL daLed !anuary 4 1991 slgned by Pead LxecuLlve AsslsLanL ArLuro v Agundo of Lhe ueparLmenL of Local CovernmenL 1he reacLlon of Lhe SLS was Lo pass 8esoluLlon no 1 daLed !anuary 8 1991 8 where lL relLeraLed lLs prevlous recognlLlon of Alar and declared LhaL Lhe recall order lssued by SecreLary SanLos daLed uecember 19 1990 recalllng Lhe appolnLmenL of ALLy Alar has no legal basls ln facL and ln law and lssued Lo flL hls whlmslcal caprlclous and wlshywashy deslres Lo Lhe deLrlmenL of decency and due process of law SecreLary SanLos lssued on lebruary 20 1991 anoLher recall order Lhls Llme addressed Lo uocena oppoloteJ by took ootb A oppoloteJ by 5l5 tecoqolzeJ A tecolleJ A 5l5 stlll tecoqolzeJ A tecolleJ uocena Lhen came Lo Lhls CourL ln a peLlLlon for mooJomos Lo compel Lhe respondenLs Lo recognlze and admlL hlm as a lawfully appolnLed member of Lhe Sanggunlang anlalawlgan of LasLern Samar Section 50 oI the Local Government Code reading as Iollows: Sec. 50. !ermanent Jacancies in Local Sanggunians. In case oI permanent vacancy in the sangguniang panlalawigan, sangguniang panlungsod, sangguniang bayan, or sangguniang barangay, the President oI the Philippines, upon recommendation oI the Minister oI Local Government, shall appoint a qualiIied person to Iill the vacancy in the sangguniang panlalawigan and the sangguniang panlungsod; the governor, in the case oI sangguniang bayan members; or the city or municipal mayor, in the case oI sangguniang barangay members. Except Ior the sangguniang barangay, the appointee shall come from the political party of the sanggunian member who caused the vacancy, and shall serve the unexpired term oI the vacant oIIice. boLh uocena and CaplLo ran for Lhe provlnclal board ln Lhe 1988 elecLlons under Lhe banner of Lakas ng 8ansa LaLer Lhey boLh [olned Lhe Laban ng uemokraLlkong lllplno under Lhe leadershlp of Speaker MlLra who admlnlsLered Lhe oaLh of offlce Lo hlm when he was appolnLed Lo Lhe SLS on november 19 1990 uocena argues LhaL he has a preferenLlal rlghL Lo Lhe dlspuLed offlce even on equlLable grounds because he placed nlnLh ln Lhe elecLlon nexL Lo CaplLo compared Lo Alar who dld noL even run for Lhe offlce lrom Lhe Lenor of Lhe appolnLmenL exLended Lo uocena on november 19 1990 Lhere ls no quesLlon LhaL lL was lnLended Lo be petmooeot Lo flll Lhe permanenL vacancy caused by CaplLos deaLh As such lL was Lo be valld for Lhe unexplred porLlon of Lhe Lerm of Lhe deceased member 1he sald appolnLmenL had been accepLed by uocena who had ln facL already assumed offlce as member of Lhe SLS as per cerLlflcaLlon of Lhe rovlnclal SecreLary
lor all legal lnLenLs and purposes Lhe uocena's appolnLmenL
had already become compleLe and enforceable aL Lhe Llme lL was supposed Lo have been superseded by Lhe appolnLmenL ln favor of Alar uocenas appolnLmenL havlng been lssued and accepLed earller and Lhe uocena havlng already assumed offlce he could noL LhereafLer be [usL recalled and replaced Lo accommodaLe Alar 1he appolnLmenL was permanenL ln naLure and for Lhe unexplred porLlon of Lhe CaplLo's Lerm uocena had already acqulred securlLy of Lenure ln Lhe poslLlon and could be removed Lherefrom only for any of Lhe causes and conformably Lo Lhe procedure prescrlbed by Lhe Local CovernmenL Code 2 1hese requlremenLs could noL be clrcumvenLed by Lhe slmple process of recalllng hls appolnLmenL Lhe recognlLlon and admlsslon of Lhe uocena ls a mlnlsLerlal duLy SLS have no auLhorlLy for Lhe dlscreLlon Lo revlew and lf Lhey so declde re[ecL Lhe SecreLarys appolnLmenL laced wlLh a sLrlcLly legal quesLlon Lhey had no rlghL and compeLence Lo resolve lL ln Lhelr dlscreLlon WhaL Lhey should have done was reserve Lhelr [udgmenL on Lhe maLLer leavlng lL Lo Lhe courLs of [usLlce Lo declde whlch of Lhe confllcLlng clalms should be upheld As a local leglslaLlve body sub[ecL Lo Lhe general supervlslon of Lhe resldenL of Lhe hlllpplnes Lhe SLS had no dlscreLlon Lo rule on Lhe valldlLy of Lhe declslons of Lhe SecreLary of Local CovernmenL acLlng as her alLer ego DL kAMA v CA de Rama wrote a CSC seeking the recall of the appointments of fourteen (14) municipal employees. on the allegation that the appointments of the said employees were "midnight appointments of the former mayor
in violation of Article V, Section 15 of the 1987 Constitution, which provides that two months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end of his term, a President or Acting President shall not make appointments, except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued vacancies therein will prejudice public service or endanger public safety.
an appointment accepted by the appointee cannot be withdrawn or revoked by the appointing authority and shall remain in force and in effect until disapproved by the Commission.
DAVID v COMELEC Contending that their term is five years, petitioners ask this Court to order the cancellation of the scheduled barangay election this coming May 12, 1997 and to reset it to the second Monday of May, 1999.
Clear Legislative Intentand Design to Limit Term to Three Years RA 7160, the term of office of barangay officials was fixed at "three (3) years which shall begin after the regular election of barangay officials on the second Monday of May 1994.
Three-Year Term Not Repugnant, to Constitution Art10 Sec. 8. The term of office of elective local officials, except barangay officiaIs, which shaII be determined by Iaw, shall be three years, and no such official shall serve for more than three consecutive terms. Voluntary renunciation of the office for any length of time shall not be considered as an interruption in the continuity of his service for the full term for which he was elected.
Constitution did not expressly prohibit Congress from fixing any term of office for barangay officials. (can be 3 yrs)
!etitioners Estopped From Challenging Their Three-Year Terms they were elected under 7610
RAMOS v CA
Ramos et al sued municipality to have ordinances declared null. Municipality was represented by pvt atty Romanillos and prov'l atty regalado. (collaborating counsels)
Ramos et al questioned romanillos's personality to appear, but only after proceedings had started. n the end romanillos withdraw and Regalado adopted the proceedings undertaken by Romanillos.