Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Leviticus 4:13-21
Cascades Fellowship CRC, JX MI
August 17, 2003
The story of Frankenstein has fascinated generations since its appearing in 1818.
It is a many-splendored thing, speaking eloquently on such social ills as child neglect and
scientific advancement in the absence of ethics. The story is just as relevant today in the
light of parent absenteeism and cloning as it was in the day of its writing.
But the story speaks to us in many other ways as well – subtle ways, evident only
to the observant and wise. I remember when I studied this story in college. Since
Romantic Literature was an upper level class, it was filled with literaries, who read into
every story and poem their own ideals, rather than striving to understand the author’s
intent. The theories on the message of Frankenstein abounded, and grew stranger as we
discussions. In all honesty, it was maddening, particularly when the story itself makes it
clear that the real message is the arrogance – the pride, the hubris – of man in his
how the pride of creating something new, which drives the motor of discovery, could
When viewed theologically you can boil Frankenstein down to story about sin.
Pride, arrogantly assuming the mantle of God, is what got us in trouble in the garden and
it is the root of the travails that assail Victor Frankenstein. The monster becomes the
embodiment of his pride and runs amok, destroying all the scientist held dear. What we
find out about sin in Frankenstein is that it has a seeping quality about it – it pollutes all it
Sin is a topic we don’t talk about much anymore. We speak at length and fondly
of grace, we dwell often on love, we thrill at the talk of mercy, but when the conversation
turns to sin, we clam up. We don’t have much to say. Many in the Christian church
would like us to forget about sin. Why not accentuate the positive? Why talk about sin?
All it does is bring us down – destroys our self-esteem. We cannot attract new believers
to our church by talking about sin – such negativity would only drive the seeker away.
To accommodate this happy outlook we have even gone so far as to change the
lyrics of some our oldest and most beloved hymns. No more talk of worms! It’s too
degrading! Let’s change it to say “…to one such as I” or “ a sinner such as I.” Somehow
we think that the change will make the truth more palatable to the unbelieving. Why talk
Let me offer two answers – a common sense answer and a theological answer.
The common sense answer is simply this – in order for the good news to be good, it must
have a comparative, something to measure it against. For good news to be good, there
The theological answer is that sin is the cosmic problem. It is the reason for the
existence of the good news. And biblically speaking, without the emergence of sin in
Genesis 3, we don’t have Genesis 4 through Revelation 22. The Scriptures tell the story
of how God deals with the problem of sin and reclaims his misdirected creation. We need
to speak of sin because it is essential to our story. Only in the shadow of the Fall does the
light of the good news appear in its truest brilliance. We need to know how bad our
situation really is before we can appreciate how good it can be in Christ. And we need to
remember how bad it really was in order to truly grasp how blessed we are in Christ. So
filled with startling imagery aimed at exposing the seriousness of sin. It presents in
compelling detail what the people of God must do when they realize the stain of sin has
spread over the entire community. I want us to begin this morning by taking a look at the
context for this passage – moving from its broader context to its more immediate
framework. Then we will explore some of the imagery, coming to grips with how
seriously sin should be taken. Finally, we will talk about this passage in our context –
The Book of Leviticus doesn’t get much airplay from the pulpit today. And for
good reason – we just don’t know what to do with this book full of laws and regulations.
In our grace-filled religion law seems so… well, legalistic. And all that animal sacrifice
stuff, that just offends the new millennium Christian’s sensibilities. But when you read
Leviticus in the light of how the Exodus narrative ends, the book becomes less about law
and more about how to live before a gracious and holy God.1
1
For a more explicit treatment read Dr. Arie Leder and Rev. David Vroege’s article “Reading and Hearing
Leviticus” Calvin Theological Journal 34 (1999) pp. 417-431.
You may remember that Exodus ends with the account of the glory cloud
representing God’s presence settling on the Tabernacle. God now dwelt in the midst of
his people. But there is an unarticulated problem – God is holy, Israel is not. They are a
sinful and stiff-necked people. It has not been that long since the Golden Calf episode.
And holiness demands that sin be dealt with. How can they hope to live in the presence
That is the broader framework you must bring to any reading of Leviticus and
when you do, you find that Leviticus is not all about law – crime and punishment. It is
God’s gracious provision for his people. It is instruction on how Israel can live with God
in their midst.
Now let’s narrow the context a little. In the first three chapters of Leviticus we are
1, the burnt offering atones for sin; in chapter 3, the fellowship offering or peace offering
reconciles our relationship with the Creator. Only one thing more is needed –
purification.
What we must remember when we are dealing with sin is that it is not so easily
contained to a single act. Dealing with sin requires more than just forgiveness. Like a
pebble thrown into the still waters of a pond, sin spreads beyond the sinner. As noted
earlier, it has a seeping quality about it. It defiles not only the sinner, but the place where
the sinner sins. And in a very real sense – biblically speaking – the sinner carries the
stink of sin wherever he or she goes. For ancient Israel, this included the Tabernacle –
the place where God dwelt among his people. We’ll explore this more in a few moments.
Now with the broad and narrow contexts in view, let us consider the imagery of
our text. Much has been made over the centuries concerning each element of the
sacrifice. In the eyes of some commentators, the blood of the animal symbolized the
soul, the fat portions the best part of man, and the meat and hide that is carried outside of
camp the body of sin that is to be burned up in the fire. Of such symbolic interpretations
There are, however, three things I am sure of. The first is that there is clearly a
substitution taking place in the sacrifice – the animal dies in the place of sinner. Look
What is striking in this passage is the oozing nature of sin. This is not for the sin
of the individual. In fact, if you read on in Leviticus chapters 4 and 5 you will find that
there is specific instruction given to the individual for making a sin offering. In this
particular passage, however, God addresses communal sin – the failure to be a people
defined by allegiance and obedience to God. It is not necessarily one communal act, but
rather a communal attitude or laxity toward sin. This is the defilement of the mass of
And so the elders, representing the whole of the community would come before
the tent of meeting with a sacrifice – a bull – and place their hands upon its head as it was
slaughtered. Commentator Matthew Henry remarks, “He that laid his hand on the head
of the beast thereby owned that he deserved to die himself, and that it was God’s great
mercy that he would please to accept the offering of this beast to die for him.”2 The clear
intention of placing the hand on the head of the sacrifice was to identify the sacrifice with
the sinner – in this case, to mark it as standing in the place of the sin-stained community.
The wage of sin is death, so without the shedding of blood, there is no forgiveness.
Imagine the scene, you are an Israelite in need of forgiveness and cleansing, so
you bring the requisite sacrifice before the tent of meeting. The cloying stench of blood
hangs heavy in the air – the sacrifice smells the carnage and begins to struggle. You
wrestle the animal into place, putting your hand on its head. And while this act of
identification is taking place, the priest draws the knife across the neck of the sacrifice.
In clear, graphic detail you – the sinner in search of forgiveness and cleansing – see up
Sin is serious business. Everything about the sacrifice points to how profoundly
sin impacts our life and our world. And as we have noted, sin must be dealt with.
Which leads me to the second thing I am sure of concerning the symbolism of this
passage. Despite the disturbing picture it presents, the killing of the sacrificial animal is
not the central point. The central focus of this passage is what is done with the blood of
2
Henry, Matthew, Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Bible, (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers) 1997.
When you read through chapter 4, you will find that it follows a pattern. It deals
first with the sin offering of the priest – who bears the corporate presence of Israel before
God. Then, we have our passage for this morning – the sin offering for the community.
The sin offering for the individual leader in the community and then for the individual
follows.
There is a pattern to how the blood is used in each sin offering. As the presence of
Israel – in the person of the priest - penetrates deeper into the Tent of Meeting, the blood
of the sin offering must be sprinkled accordingly. Why? Because sin pollutes, it seeps, it
defiles.
For sin to be fully dealt with the pollution of sin needs to be purged from the
sinner – in particular where it has seeped into the presence of the Holy One of Israel. The
presence of the sinner, even in seeking atonement, defiled the Tabernacle. Ah, but there
is grace in the instruction concerning the sin offering. It is the means of purification, the
way to clean up the pollution spread by sin. 3 Through it the sinner was purified and able
The final thing I am sure of concerning the symbolism of this passage is that the
removal of the rest of the animal that was not burned upon the altar of burnt offering
represents the removal of the pollution of sin from the camp. It is a declaration that the
camp is clean and Tabernacle is once again purified and a fitting dwelling for the
presence of God.
3
Dr. Gordon J. Wenham offers an exceptional treatment of the sin offering as purification in The New International
Commentary on the Old Testament: The Book of Leviticus pp.84-103 (Eerdmanns; Grand Rapids 1979).
All of this imagery – disturbing and brutal as it is – reveals to us just how serious
sin really is. It is not just mild indiscretion – just a personal weakness that when time
permits we can deal with at our leisure. Sin requires immediate and drastic action
because it disrupts the bonds of covenant relationship. Most important to note is that it
breaks fellowship between Creator and creature. But, tragically, it also breaks the bonds
I could provide you with an endless list of examples of how sin disrupts the
fellowship of the faith community, but let me ask you a couple questions instead. How
often do we run to a fellow believer and joyously exclaim that we just slept with our
neighbor’s spouse? We don’t – instead we work hard to keep it secret. We build walls of
deception to hide our sin. Or how often after a Sunday service do you get everyone’s
attention in the fellowship hall to share that juicy piece of gossip? You don’t – instead
the gossip is whispered, one eager ear to another, in secret. Do see a pattern here? Sin
seeps into all our relationships, isolating us with walls of deception – destroying the unity
Sin really does need to be addressed – individually and corporately. Its seeping,
polluting, defiling nature demands radical measures. What are we to do? If we sacrificed
an animal as Leviticus describes PETA would certainly pursue us to the ends of the earth.
We would be charged with animal cruelty. How then do we deal with the defilement of
sin?
Beloved of God, the atoning death of Christ has purchased so much more than our
pardon from sin. His death has even done more than purchased our peace with God. The
blood of Christ is also the means by which we are purified – cleansed completely from
Think about that for a moment. The shameful stench and filth that clung to us
because of our past sinful life – whether it be from drug abuse, dishonesty, promiscuity,
perversion, drunkenness, violence, adultery or murder, you fill in the blank – is wiped
clean. We are not only justified, we are purified in the sight of God, because of what
Christ has done. People of God we are clean! Our uncleanness washed away by the
Maybe you’re here today and you don’t feel so clean. The stink of some secret sin
hangs over you like bad body odor. Or maybe you don’t realize how clean you really are
– you’ve grown up with Christ and it never dawned on you that you need to be cleaned in
the first place. And you still struggle with a lifetime – be it long or short – of white lies
and quiet private lusts. Regardless I have good news this morning – you can be clean!
How?
Think back to our passage again – when was the sacrifice offered? When the
person or community recognized and acknowledged the sin. Only then did they lay their
hand on the head of the sacrifice, admitting their need for atonement and cleansing. 1
John 1:9 tells us that if we acknowledge our sin, if we confess it, God is faithful and just
and will forgive us our sin and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
Having sin in the camp is a dangerous thing. It must be dealt with. Only one
measure is radical enough to deal with it finally and fully. The good news is that God has
done something radical. He has shed his own blood – not only so that we could be
forgiven our sin, but also to wash away the pollution of sin. Let’s keep our camp clean.
Let’s acknowledge our sin before God daily – trusting ourselves continually to the
finished work of Christ. If you have never experienced the cleansing that is ours in
Christ, I invite you to talk to me after the service. You can not only know the grace of