RE: Why I Left Islam?

[longer version] (Ali Sina)

'Compilation of Alleged EX-Muslims Who Left Islam' FAITH FREEDOM.ORG http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sina/frombelief.htm

by:

*Bismillahi Ar-Rahman Ar-Raheem (In the name of Allah(swt) Most Gracious, Most Merciful) All Praise and Thanks are due to Almighty Allah(swt) the Creator and Sustainer of all things seen and unseen. We testify that none has the right/authority/privelage of being worshipped except for Almighty Allah(swt), and we testify that Abu al-Qasim Muhammad Ibn Abd Allah Ibn Abd al-Muttalib Ibn Hashim (salalahu alayhi wasalaam ) is the slave and the last and final Prophet and Messenger chosen by Almighty Allah(swt). The best speech is the speech of Almighty Allah(swt), and the best guidance is the guidance of Prophet Muhammad(salalahu alayhi wasalaam *.) _______________________________________________________________________ _

(Ali Sina) said;

I was born into a moderately religious family. On my mothers side I have a few relatives who are Ayatollahs. Although my grandfather (whom I never met) was somewhat a skeptic, we were believers. My parents were not fond of the mullahs. In fact, we did not have much to do with our more fundamentalist relatives. We liked to think of ourselves as believing in true Islam, not the one taught and practiced by the mullahs.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Notice the 'Separation Attempt' put forward by Ali Sina. A separation attempt is commonly utilized by anti-Islamic Propagandist or (AIP) to convince the reader that they are greater in status or rank than the ones whom they are condeming or opposing, so as to create the illusion of certainty of practice. Ali Sina has stated; "I was born into a moderately religious family. On my mothers side I have a few relatives who are Ayatollahs. Although my grandfather (whom I never met) was somewhat a skeptic, we were believers. My parents were not fond of the mullahs. In fact, we did not have much to do with our more fundamentalist relatives. We liked to think of ourselves as believing in true Islam, not the one taught and practiced by the mullahs." The set up is, he was born into a moderately religious family. He had a few relatives who were ayatollahs, his parents were not fond of mullahs. The context is, he didn't have much to do with his FUNDAMENTALIST relatives. The set up conclusion is that, him and his family considered themselves to be followers of the true Islam. Amazingly enough, Ali Sina expects the readers to believe in his conartistry and trickery of wordplay. How is it that Ali Sina was born into a moderately religious family, yet he has a few relatives who were Ayatollah's, but his parents weren't fond of Mullahs, but yet some of his family were the fundamentalist? He then continues to inform the readers that, his immediate family didn't have anything to do with their fundamentalist relatives. Doesn't Ali Sina know that a fundamentalist by definition is a 'strict adherence to the basic principles of any subject or discipline:'? With that fact in mind, *Why is it that Ali Sina and his family didn't want anything to do with those who could possibly assist them in their faith through knowledge and instruction? Ali Sina then follows up that statement by saying that him along with his family believed that they were in the 'True Islam' and not one practiced by the mullahs. Doesn't Ali Sina know that a Mullah by defenition is a man who is educated in Islamic Theology and scripture like a (Sheikh)? Point to be noted, Ali Sina did not state that the mullah's who his family rejected, were causing corruption or bid'ah or rejecting the Noble Qur'an or Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). Therefore, there are no legitmate grounds to validate the disliking of mullah's. Again!

*Why would Ali Sina and his family, not want anything to do with the learned men and fundamentalist (those who practice the fundamentals of Islam [i.e. 5 pillars, Iman, Sunnah etc]? How can Ali Sina and his family be TRUE MUSLIMS when they are disconnected from family members who are probably more learned concerning the teachings of Islam and what it means to be a Muslim than they are?

(Ali Sina) said;

I recall discussing religion with the husband of one of my aunts when I was about 15 years old. He was a fanatical Muslim who was very concerned about the fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). It prescribes the way Muslims should pray, fast, run their public and private lives, do business, clean themselves, use the toilet, and even copulate. I argued this has nothing to do with true Islam, that it is a fabrication of the Mullahs, that excessive attention to fiqh diminishes the impact and importance of the pure message of Islam, to unite man with his creator. This view is mostly inspired by Sufism. Many Iranians, thanks to Rumi's poems, are to a great degree Sufis in their outlook.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

If Ali Sina is nothing else, he is certainly comical and entertaining, as his ignorance to Islamic doctrine is illuminated throughout his 'wild fantasy'. He has emphatically stated; "I recall discussing religion with the husband of one of my aunts when I was about 15 years old. He was a fanatical Muslim who was very concerned about the fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence). It prescribes the way Muslims should pray, fast, run their public and private lives, do business, clean themselves, use the toilet, and even copulate. I argued this has nothing to do with true Islam, that it is a fabrication of the Mullahs, that excessive attention to fiqh diminishes the impact and importance of the pure message of Islam, to unite man with his creator." Ali Sina has clearly overlooked the fundamentals of Islam and has taken it with a grain of salt. (Maybe your family should've kept in touch with your fundamentalist relatives). At this point, Ali Sina is demonstrating that he is the master of self delusion, as he continues to bury his presentation of apostasy. He states that 'Praying, Fasting' (Qur'an) and how to run public and private lives, do business, clean ourselves and use the toilet etc (Sunnah) has nothing to do with 'true Islam'. For that reason, we will direct our attention to the Noble Qur'an and Sahih Hadith and see what these Islamic sources say regarding the above mentioned.

PRAYING: 110. And be steadfast in prayer and regular in charity: And whatever good ye send forth for your souls before you, ye shall find it with Allah. for Allah sees Well all that ye do. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:110/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 153. O ye who believe! seek help with patient perseverance and prayer; for Allah is with those who patiently persevere. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:153/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 238. Guard strictly your (habit of) prayers, especially the Middle Prayer; and stand before Allah in a devout (frame of mind). (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:238/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

From the above narrartions from the Glorious Qur'an, we learn the following; (1) Be Steadfast in PRAYER. (2) Seek help with Patient perseverance and PRAYER. (3) Guard strictly our (habit of) PRAYERS. *There are approximately 149 verses of the Noble Qur'an which instruct, teach, and command that the act of PRAYER be engaged in. There are also 500 Hadith narrarations which instruct, teach, and command the act of PRAYER be engaged in. Please Visit 'The Noble Act of Submission -Prayer & Purity' for more information. (Before we comment on the adolescent folly of Ali Sina) please continue reading below. FASTING: 183. O ye who believe! Fasting is prescribed to you as it was prescribed to those before you, that ye may (learn) self-restraint,- (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:183/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 184. (Fasting) for a fixed number of days; but if any of you is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed number (Should be made up) from days later. For those who can do it (With hardship), is a ransom, the feeding of one that is indigent. But he that will give more, of

his own free will,- it is better for him. And it is better for you that ye fast, if ye only knew. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:184/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 185. Ramadhan is the (month) in which was sent down the Qur'an, as a guide to mankind, also clear (Signs) for guidance and judgment (Between right and wrong). So every one of you who is present (at his home) during that month should spend it in fasting, but if any one is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed period (Should be made up) by days later. Allah intends every facility for you; He does not want to put to difficulties. (He wants you) to complete the prescribed period, and to glorify Him in that He has guided you; and perchance ye shall be grateful. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:185/ Yusuf Ali Translation) From the above narrartions from the Glorious Qur'an, we learn the following; (1) FASTING is prescribed for Muslims. (2) It is better that we Muslims engage in FASTING. (3) During the month of Ramadan, Muslims whould spend it FASTING. *There are also 500 Hadith narrarations which instruct, teach, and command the act of FASTING to be engaged in. Please Visit 'Fasting In Islam,' 'Fasting Prescribed in The Bible' 'The Healing of Fasting' for more information. (Before we comment on the adolescent folly of Ali Sina) please continue reading below.

ATTENTION: Although the last part of the previous statement of Ali Sina is tempting to address here in FULL, (see below) "....run their public and private lives, do business, clean themselves, use the toilet, and even copulate. I argued this has nothing to do with true Islam..." There is too much Islamic legislation and instruction from the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (salahu alayhi wasalaam) to be covered in one sitting. For more information concerning these issues raised by this greatly benighted individual... please see our following articles below, * The Noble Qur'an and Sunnah is Obligatory * Business Transactions, Deals and Oaths in the Sunnah

* Hygiene and Cleanliness Ordained in Islam Notice the intentional deception put forward by Ali Sina. In context of his own words, this is what he has declared thus far.... (1) We did NOT have MUCH TO DO WITH OUR FUNDAMENTALIST FAMILY! (2) We believe OURSELVES to be following the 'TRUE ISLAM' (3) PRAYER, FASTING, Business, How to live etc, I ARGUED has nothing to do with 'TRUE ISLAM' Ali Sina is evidently lost in his understanding of Islam. When we isolate each claim put forward by him, we can see that each statement compliments the other in affirming his ignorance. He said; HE DIDN"T HAVE MUCH TO DO WITH HIS FUNDAMENTALIST FAMILY, therefore, complimenting the fact that he believed the obligatory instruction of Islam had nothing to do with 'TRUE ISLAM' and therefore him believing that he is following the 'true Islam'. This nonsensical half-witted doltish propagandist, attempted to pull a fast one, so as to convince the non-Muslims or alleged ex-Muslims that if nothing else, his leaving of 'true Islam' is certifable through his past experience. Let us further our study of Ali Sina and then proceed to judge (by Qur'an and Sunnah) whether or not he was a true Muslim or a fraudulent obstructor from the very beginning.

(Ali Sina) said;

In my early youth I noticed discriminations and cruelties against the members of religious minorities in Iran. This was more noticeable in provincial towns where the level of education was low and the mullahs had a better grip over gullible people. Due to my fathers work we spent a few years in small towns out of the capital. I recall one of my teachers who planned to take the class swimming. We were excited and looked forward to it. In the class there were a couple of kids who were Baha'i and Jewish. The teacher did not let them accompany us. He said they are not allowed to swim in the same pool that Muslims swim in. I cannot forget the kids disappointment as they left school with tears in their eyes, subdued and heartbroken. At that age, maybe nine or ten, I could not make sense of and was saddened by this injustice. I thought it was the kids fault for not being Muslims.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina has now entered into his second phase of anti-Islamic propaganda (AIP). The first stage was his 'Separation Attempt' where previously, we witnessed that he tried to

make himself the penacle of Islam by rejecting (Fundamentalism and Obligatory Practice) [epic fail]. Now, although he is blind to his previous failure, he is still confident in undertaking his next venture. In the above externalizing from Ali Sina, he has yet again decided to cling to his imaginative throne or 'Air Castle'. Ali Sina narrates a time in his life (adolescents) where he was attending a school where there was kids who followed the Baha'i faith and kids who were Jewish. He states that when it was time to swim in the pool, his instructor emphatically declared that the Baha'i and Jewish children were not permitted to swim in the same pool as Muslims. [Note: Ali Sina is clearly unaware of the ruthless treatment and negligence of non-Jewish people (i.e. Gentiles, Goims).] (Please Visit our following articles for more information regarding the treatment of Gentiles (non-Jews) in the Bible and Talmudic Scriptures. * 'Treatment of Non-Jewish People in the Talmud' * 'The Annihilation of Non-Jews 'Extermination of the Gentiles During The Time of Moses' Soon after these children began to cry, and he (Ali Sina) could not comprehend this 'injustice' and he thought it was their fault for not being Muslims. ATTENTION: (1) How is it that Ali Sina did not understand that sense of 'INJUSTICE' but in the same breathe says 'I THOUGHT IT WAS THEIR FAULT for NOT BEING MUSLIM'? If Ali Sina believed it was their fault for not being Muslim, how could he believe that it was a sense of injustice? Did he not realize that he 'THOUGHT IT WAS THEIR FAULT' from the beginning? Again! Ali Sina is prolonged in his folly, so much so that he doesn't even realize when he is contradicting himself. NOTE: We at WIO do not believe it is proper conduct for an adult/educator/ Muslim man to declare that openly in front of children who don't have a proper understanding of their particular faiths (to know the distinction) between the TRUTH of Islam as compared to other faiths. Therefore, if they are as Ali Sina stated about 9 years to 10 years old, then most likely they have not reached the age of puberty to make a mature conscious decision concerning a particular belief and are absolved from ridicule and rejection.

(Ali Sina) said;

I believe I was lucky for having open-minded parents who encouraged me to think critically. They tried to instill in me the love of God and his messenger, yet upheld humanistic values like equality of rights between man and woman, and love for all humankind. In a sense, this is how most modern Iranian families were. In fact, the majority of Muslims who have some education believe Islam is a humanistic religion that respects human rights, that elevates the status of women and protects their rights. Most Muslims believe that Islam means peace. Needless to say, few of them have read the Quran. I spent my early youth in this sweet dream, advocating true Islam as I thought it should be, and criticizing the mullahs and their deviations from the real teachings of Islam. I idealized an Islam that conformed to my own humanistic values. Of course my imaginary Islam was a beautiful religion. It was a religion of equality and peace. It was a religion that encouraged its followers to go after knowledge and be inquisitive. It was a religion that was in harmony with science and reason. In fact, I thought that science got its inspiration from this religion. The Islam I believed was a religion that sparkled with modern science, which eventually bore its fruit in the West and made modern discoveries and inventions possible. Islam, I believed, was the real cause of modern civilization. The reason Muslims were living in such a miserable state of ignorance, I thought, was all the fault of the self-centered mullahs and religious leaders who for their own personal gain had misinterpreted the real teachings of Islam. Muslims honestly believe that the great Western civilization has its roots in Islam. They recall great Middle Eastern scientific minds whose contributions to science have been crucial in the birth of modern science. Omar Khayyam was a great mathematician who calculated the length of the year with a precision of .74% of a second. Zakaria Razi can very well be regarded as one of the first founders of empirical science who based his knowledge on research and experimentation. Avicenna's (Bu Ali Sina) monumental encyclopedia of medicine was taught in European universities for centuries. There are so many more great luminaries who have Islamic names who were the pioneers of modern science when Europe was languishing in the medieval Dark Ages. Like all Muslims, I believed all these great men were Muslims, that they were inspired by the wealth of hidden knowledge in the Quran; and that if today's Muslims could regain the original purity of Islam, the long lost glorious days of Islam would return and Muslims would lead the advancement of World civilization once again.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

This is where the treacherous and insidious nature of Ali Sina shines the brightest. It astonishes us, how these alleged ex-Muslims were incapable of dissecting these fallacious statements of this deceptive individual. (see below) "I spent my early youth in this sweet dream, advocating true Islam as I thought it should be, and criticizing the mullahs and their deviations from the real teachings of Islam. I idealized an Islam that conformed to my own humanistic values. Of course my imaginary Islam was a beautiful religion. It was a religion of equality and peace. It was

a religion that encouraged its followers to go after knowledge and be inquisitive. It was a religion that was in harmony with science and reason. In fact, I thought that science got its inspiration from this religion. The Islam I believed was a religion that sparkled with modern science, which eventually bore its fruit in the West and made modern discoveries and inventions possible. Islam, I believed, was the real cause of modern civilization. The reason Muslims were living in such a miserable state of ignorance, I thought, was all the fault of the self-centered mullahs and religious leaders who for their own personal gain had misinterpreted the real teachings of Islam." We will now begin to amputate these daffy and ficiticious claims. (1) "I spent my early youth in this sweet dream, advocating true Islam as I thought it should be, and criticizing the mullahs and their deviations from the real teachings of Islam. I idealized an Islam that conformed to my own humanistic values. Interestingly enough, as we learned previously, Ali Sina is incapable of telling the truth about Islam from the fabrications attributed to Islam. Ali Sina further affirms our statements, by openly declaring "true Islam, as I thought it should be". Is this the same Islam that (according to him) is arguable concerning Prayer and Fasting (exposed)? Is this the same Islam that shouldn't have any instructions or teachings of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) whom according to the Qur'an is on an Exalted Standard of character (exposed)? Is this the same Qur'an whom Almighty Allah(swt) has declared that we Muslims are to Obey Allah(swt) and His Messenger? He further says; "I idealized an Islam that, confromed to my own humanistic values." What humanistic values would that be? The humanistic values of hate mongering and outright dessimilation of a moral character? The humanistic values that attack, condemn and fallaciously attribute things (i.e.to Islam) without right, just to mislead the populous and gain fame? (2) Of course my imaginary Islam was a beautiful religion. It was a religion of equality and peace. It was a religion that encouraged its followers to go after knowledge and be inquisitive. It was a religion that was in harmony with science and reason. His 'imaginary Islam' is absolutely right, its the most truthful thing he has said thus far. Ali Sina clearly has not escaped his 'Air Castle', and has established himself on the throne of humility and disgrace. He implies that Islam is not a religion of peace and equality, and is a religion which doesn't encourage the pursuit of knowledge and to be inquisitive, and that it wasn't a religion which found harmony with science and reason. These points which he has raised are too extensive and heavy in detail to be discussed here, (Please Visit our following article(s) for more information) * Equality in Islam -Unification Through Purification * Knowledge the Key to Understanding * The Qur'an via Science - Supporting or Distoring

Will the folly not cease? (continue below)

(Ali Sina) said;

Iran was a Muslim country but it was also a corrupt country. The chance of getting into a university was slim. Only one in ten applicants could get into the university. Often they were forced to choose subjects that they did not want to study because they could not get enough points for the subjects of their choice. Students with the right connections often got the seats. The standard of education in Iran was not ideal. Universities were under-funded, as the Shah preferred building a powerful military might to become the gendarme of the Middle East rather than build the infrastructure of the country and invest in peoples education. These were reasons why my father thought I would be better off to leave Iran to continue my education elsewhere.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

There are economic hindrances all across the globe. Ali Sina should not play the congeniality card in place of reason. What is the purpose of Ali Sina mentioning that Iran was a Muslim country? then he goes to say 'but it was corrupt'. If Iran was a 'corrupt' Muslim country, doesn't that only affirm that they were not practicing the teachings of Islam correctly? With that in mind, What purpose does it serve for Ali Sina to mention the following? "Universities were under-funded, as the Shah preferred building a powerful military might to become the gendarme of the Middle East rather than build the infrastructure of the country and invest in peoples education." Ali Sina is a well versed contemptible magician, who uses his words to create the illusion of a problem (with Islam). He is engaging in the fallacy of 'Poisoning the Well', he assumes that by seeking to silently attribute cultural dilemma with Islam, he will then discredit any of Islam's teaching. As we read deeper into this illusionist apostasy story from Islam, he shamelessly continues to bury his position even deeper with his everlasting ignorance. (please continue reading)

(Ali Sina) said;

We considered America and Europe, but my father, acting upon the counsel of a few of his religious friends, thought another Islamic country would be better for a 16 year old boy. We were told that the Wests morality is too lax, people are perverted, the beaches are full of nudes, and they drink and have licentious lifestyles, all of which are dangers to a young man. So I was sent to Pakistan instead, where people were religious and thus it was safe and moral. A friend of the family told us that Pakistan is just like England, except that it is cheaper. This, of course, proved to be untrue. I found Pakistanis to be as immoral and corrupt as Iranians. Yes they were very religious. They did not eat pork and I saw no one consuming alcohol in public, but I noticed they had dirty minds, lied, were hypocrites, were cruel to women, and above all, were filled with hatred of the Indians. I did not find them better than Iranians in any way. They were religious but not moral or ethical.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Will the abudance of foolishness not end? Ali Sina stated that his father (who was) 'acting upon the counsel of a few of his religious friends' thought an Islamic country would be better for a 16 year old boy. he then states; "We were told that the Wests morality is too lax, people are perverted, the beaches are full of nudes, and they drink and have licentious lifestyles, all of which are dangers to a young man." Did not Ali Sina think that was all true? Was he not aware of the Western lifestyle? Did he need his father familiarizing that with him? (Note: You don't need to be a rocket scientist to know the lifestyle of the people living in the west, or how they dress, how they act etc.) Then he says that he went to Pakistan because he heard from his friend that it was just like Britain but less expensive (cheaper). He testify's that the people there were very religious, then gives examples of their committment by stating; "they did not eat pork, or consume alcohol openly" Then he states; "but I noticed they had dirty minds, lied, were hypocrites, were cruel to women, and above all, were filled with hatred of the Indians. I did not find them better than Iranians in any way. They were religious but not moral or ethical."

Interestingly enough, the Magician further demonstrated his feats of enchantment when he said that he noticed 'they had dirty minds'. (Is Ali Sina a mind reader?) He also accused them of being liars, hypocrites, and said they were cruel to women and filled with a hatred of the Indians. (1) Would Ali Sina be willing to demonstrate how they were 'liars', 'hypocrites', and 'cruel to women'? (2) Ali Sina spoke about the Pakistanis having 'hatred' of the Indian people. (First thing to be noted; We at WIO do not sanction the hate of any people [without reason] i.e. to hate and condemn their actions ) but certainly there must be an underlining reason behind it? Is Ali Sina familiar with the 'Indo-Pakistani War' (1965) in which 3,800 Pakistani people were killed, 200 Tanks destroyed and 20 Aircrafts destroyed? (source) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1965 Although the Indians suffered a similar loss in casulties, they to have a similar array of hate and dislike toward the Pakistanis. Will Ali Sina be consistent and condemn the Indians as well? Furthermore, the United States has hated and persecuted and discriminated against Islam and Muslims ever since the terrorist attack on the World Trade Center on September 11th, 2001. Will Ali Sina be consistent and condemn the U.S. (frankly the West)? (Please Visit our article(s) providing evidence to 9/11 being an inside job for more information) * September 11th -2001 'The Inside Look About What Really Happened and Why?' * U.S. Soldiers Admit To War Crimes Committed By The United States Army The thing that astonished the WIO team more than anything else, was Ali Sina's concluding statement to his aforementioned statements of Pakistanis (in a Muslim Country of Pakistan) were no better than the Iranians. (see below) "I did not find them better than Iranians in any way. They were religious but not moral or ethical." Ali Sina is noted as saying a similar statement previously (concerning the Iranians) (see below) "Iran was a Muslim country but it was also a corrupt country." A few points to be noted

(1) Ali Sina continues to engage in the fallacy of 'Poisoning the Well', in which he seeks to use a cultural dilemma as evidence against Muslims (as a whole) to condemn Islam. (2) Ali Sina stated that he 'did not find them (Pakistanis) better than Iranians 'IN ANY WAY'. They were religious but not moral or ethical. Now lets compile all the evidence together. Previously, Ali Sina declared that Iran was a MUSLIM COUNTRY but it was also a CORRUPT COUNTRY, he also stated that he was to move to a MUSLIM COUNTRY because of his father's opposition to the West and because his friend told him that it was just like Britan (cheap). He also stated that Pakistanis were not better in ANY WAY than Iranians (they were religious but not moral or ethical) PREMISE#1 IRAN was a MUSLIM COUNTRY but it was also a CORRUPT COUNTRY. PREMISE#2 He moved to a MUSLIM COUNTRY (Pakistan), and PAKISTANIS were not better in ANY WAY than the Iranians. CONCLUSION -Therefore if (Pakistan) Pakistanis were no better than (Iran) Iranians, and Iran was a Muslim country but a 'corrupt one'. That means that the Pakistanis were living in a 'Corrupt Muslim' country which corroborates the idea even more forcefully, that where Ali Sina was living, he was not surrounded by 'True' practicing Muslims, rather a corrupt version of what 'would be' Islam. Indeed, the more WIO evaluates the wild Air Castle claims of Ali Sina, the more we are discovering that this magician is a fraudulant illusionist who seeks to bewitch the minds of the readers. (continue reading)

(Ali Sina) said;

In college, instead of taking Urdu I took Pakistani Culture to complete my A level FSc (Fellow of Science). I learned the reason for Pakistan's partition from India and for the first time heard about Muhammad Ali Jinah, the man Pakistanis called Qaid-e Azam, the great leader. He was presented as an intelligent man, the Father of the Nation, while Gandhi was spoken of in a derogatory way. Even then, I could not but side with Gandhi and condemn Jinah as an arrogant, ambitious man who was the culprit for breaking up a country and causing millions of deaths. You could say I always had a mind of my own and was a maverick in my thinking. No matter what I was taught, I always came to my own conclusion and did not believe what I was told. I did not see differences of religion as valid reasons for breaking up a country. The very

word Pakistan was an insult to the Indians. They called themselves pak (clean) to distinguish themselves from the Indians who were najis (unclean). Ironically I never saw a people dirtier than the Pakistanis both physically and mentally. It was disappointing to see another Islamic nation in such intellectual and moral bankruptcy. In discussions with my friends I failed to convince anyone of true Islam. I condemned their bigotry and fanaticism while they disapproved of me for my un-Islamic views. I related all this to my father and decided to go to Italy for my university studies. In Italy people drink wine and eat pork, but they were more hospitable, friendlier, and less hypocritical than Muslims. I noticed people were willing to help without expecting something in return. I met a very hospitable elderly couple, who invited me to have lunch with them on Sundays, so I would not have to stay home alone. They did not want anything from me. They just wanted someone to love. I was almost a grandson to them. Only strangers in a new country, who do not know anyone and cannot speak the language, can truly appreciate the value of the help and hospitality of the locals. Their house was sparkling clean, with shiny marble floors. This contradicted my idea of Westerners. Although my family was very open towards other people, Islam taught me that non-Muslims are najis (Q.9:28) and one should not befriend them. I still have a copy of the Farsi translation of the Quran I used to often read from. One of the underlined verses is: O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as awliya (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but awliya to one anotherQ.5: 51 I had difficulty understanding the wisdom of such a verse. I wondered why I should not befriend this wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing me their hospitality than just making me feel at home. I thought they were true Muslims and I tried to raise the subject of religion hoping they would see the truth of Islam and embrace it. But they were not interested and politely changed the subject. I was not stupid enough at anytime in my life to believe that all non-believers would go to hell. I read this in the Quran before but never wanted to think about it. I simply brushed it off or ignored it. Of course, I knew that God would be pleased if someone recognized his messenger but never thought he would actually be cruel enough to burn someone in hell for eternity, even if that person only does good deeds, just because he was not a Muslim. I read the following warning: If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good). Q 3:85, Yet I paid little heed and tried to convince myself the meaning is something other than what it appears to be. At that moment this was not a subject that I was ready to handle. So I did not think about it.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

-It has become blindingly apparent that Ali Sina will not relenquish his need for

duplicity. So to protect the valuable time of our readers, we will only address the above statements which are necessary to respond to. [Ali Sina] writes; "I did not see differences of religion as valid reasons for breaking up a country. The very word Pakistan was an insult to the Indians. They called themselves pak (clean) to distinguish themselves from the Indians who were najis (unclean). Ironically I never saw a people dirtier than the Pakistanis both physically and mentally. It was disappointing to see another Islamic nation in such intellectual and moral bankruptcy. In discussions with my friends I failed to convince anyone of true Islam. I condemned their bigotry and fanaticism while they disapproved of me for my un-Islamic views." We are proud to say, that we are coming ever so near to having reached the apex of Ali Sina's intentional lies and deceit. If you remember previously, Ali Sina, in explaining why the Muslims of Pakistan were immoral and corrupt was due to their illuminous hate of the Indian people. (see below) "I found Pakistanis to be as immoral and corrupt as Iranians. Yes they were very religious. They did not eat pork and I saw no one consuming alcohol in public, but I noticed they had dirty minds, lied, were hypocrites, were cruel to women, and above all, were filled with hatred of the Indians. I did not find them better than Iranians in any way. They were religious but not moral or ethical." It's amazing how expeditious Ali Sina is in his hypocrisy, just a few short paragraphs later. He first accused the Pakistanis of being immoral and corrupt and adamantly 'hating' the Indians. Then he said the following to prove that he has a similar if not mirrored hate of the Pakistanis as he accused them of having for the Indians. (see below) (1) "The very word Pakistan was an insult to the Indians." (Ali Sina) (2) "Ironically I never saw a people dirtier than the Pakistanis both physically and mentally." (Ali Sina) (3) "It was disappointing to see another Islamic nation in such intellectual and moral bankruptcy." (Ali Sina) At this point it becomes rather vellanious and unscrupulous of anyone to support Ali Sina in his evident hypocrisy. Then Ali Sina had the audacity to say; "In discussions with my friends I failed to convince anyone of true Islam. I condemned their bigotry and fanaticism while they disapproved of me for my un-Islamic views."

-WIO is overjoyed and pleased to announce that for the first time in his 'Apostasy Tale', Ali Sina has spoken the truth. In the above quote, we see him openly stating that 'he FAILED to convince ANYONE' of 'true Islam'. Well its obvious why you have 'FAILED' to persuade them of 'true Islam' because as we demonstrated earlier, you have no understanding of true Islam. And of course your friends would say your being un-Islamic, because all of your astranged wild claims have no basis in Islam and never had any grounds. *Your comprehension of Islam is like a child who sees a plate of delicious food that has broccoli on the side. The child claims that 'he doesn't need broccoli' "It prescribes the way Muslims should pray, fast, run their public and private lives, do business, clean themselves, use the toilet, and even copulate. I argued this has nothing to do with true Islam," (Ali Sina) because its yucky and not good for him, when in fact, to the contrary, its very good for him.

NEXT
[Ali Sina] writes; "I related all this to my father and decided to go to Italy for my university studies. In Italy people drink wine and eat pork, but they were more hospitable, friendlier, and less hypocritical than Muslims. I noticed people were willing to help without expecting something in return. I met a very hospitable elderly couple, who invited me to have lunch with them on Sundays, so I would not have to stay home alone. They did not want anything from me. They just wanted someone to love. I was almost a grandson to them. Only strangers in a new country, who do not know anyone and cannot speak the language, can truly appreciate the value of the help and hospitality of the locals." Thus far we have recognized that Ali Sina has been guilty of; * Illusionist Bewilderment * Intentional Dishonesty * Fallacy of 'Posioning the Well' In the above quote, Ali Sina is guilty of the fallacy of 'Appealing to Novelty' (a.k.a Appeal to the New, Newer is Better, Novelty.) which is when one states that such and such a thing (person or place) is better than this thing, because the former is a new experience, and different from the previous thing. (as shown below) "I related all this to my father and decided to go to Italy for my university studies. In

Italy people drink wine and eat pork, but they were more hospitable, friendlier, and less hypocritical than Muslims. " (Ali Sina) NOTE: The hospitable nature of a person(s) does not validate that they are righteous or pious in the sight of Almighty God(swt). Even a criminal is capable of being kind to (family, friend) or a total stranger. Ali Sina assumes, because these people were drinking wine and eating pork, that this was the vindication for it. In fact all throughout time, history has shown that consumption of Alcohol has been the reason to many immoral acts, disruption and death. (Please Visit our articles on Prohibition of Alcohol and Pork & the Dangers of Consuming It for more information) * The Danger of Consuming Alcohol & Pork (related articles of interest) * Prohibition of Alcohol in Islam * Prohibition of Meats - Consumption of Pork is Haraam * Prohibition of Alcohol in the Bible * Prohibition of Meats -Consumption of Pork is Non-Kosher

NEXT
[Ali Sina] writes; "Their house was sparkling clean, with shiny marble floors. This contradicted my idea of Westerners. Although my family was very open towards other people, Islam taught me that non-Muslims are najis (Q.9:28) and one should not befriend them. I still have a copy of the Farsi translation of the Quran I used to often read from. One of the underlined verses is: O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as awliya (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but awliya to one anotherQ.5: 51 I had difficulty understanding the wisdom of such a verse. I wondered why I should not befriend this wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing me their hospitality than just making me feel at home. I thought they were true Muslims and I tried to raise the subject of religion hoping they would see the truth of Islam and embrace it. But they were not interested and politely changed the subject. I was not stupid enough at anytime in my life to believe that all non-believers would go to hell. I read this in the Quran before but never wanted to think about it. I simply brushed it off or ignored it. Of course, I knew that God would be pleased if someone recognized his messenger but never thought he would actually be cruel enough to burn someone in hell for eternity, even if that person only does good deeds, just because he was not a Muslim.

I read the following warning: If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good). Q 3:85, Yet I paid little heed and tried to convince myself the meaning is something other than what it appears to be. At that moment this was not a subject that I was ready to handle. So I did not think about it." The WIO is now concerned, with not only the intentions of Ali Sina (in being openly deceptive) but we are also concerned with his mental health and his ability to facilitate knowledge and apprehension. He introduces this paragraph by describing the sparkling clean house (as if ) to dazzle the readers into thinking that 'ALL' non-Muslims are clean and 'ALL' Muslims are filthy. For that reason; (Please Visit our following article(s) dealing with cleanliness in Islam) * The Laundered Nature of Prophet Muhamad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) * Hygiene and Cleanliness Ordained in Islam Then he said; "This contradicted my idea of Westiners". How is it that this contradicted his idea of Westiners, when we learned previously that he did not have any understanding of the West, (evident) because he needed his father to inform him about it? Even if (for the sake of argument) he did have some knowledge of the West, Why would he cause contention with his father's friends about the lifestyle of the people in the West? In fact, his father was the origin of his (primary) knowledge of the West, and no where in his 'story telling' did he state, that his father declared that 'Westiners' were Un-Hygienic and didn't have a nice home' (see below) "We were told that the Wests morality is too lax, people are perverted, the beaches are full of nudes, and they drink and have licentious lifestyles, all of which are dangers to a young man." Notice!, no where does his father emphatically state that; "Westiners were Un-Hygienic" or that "They didn't have nice homes" Stating that they are perveted is true, the majority of the West has a perverted view of whats proper and whats improper, whats moral and whats immoral etc. FURTHERMORE, Continuing on his deranged rant, Ali Sina states that "Islam taught him that non-Muslims are Najis (unclean)" Ali Sina has completely butchered ayah 28 of Surah At-Tawbah, and untruthfully says that the Noble Qur'an declares that "ALL non-Muslims are UNCLEAN"

Let us turn to the passage and then turn to the Tafsir(s) (Legal Exegesis) of the Noble Qur'an and see what it says concerning the verse. 28. O ye who believe! Truly the Pagans are unclean; so let them not, after this year of theirs, approach the Sacred Mosque. And if ye fear poverty, soon will Allah enrich you, if He wills, out of His bounty, for Allah is All-knowing, All-wise. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:28/ Yusuf Ali Translation) The Arabic word used ( almushrikoona) [referring to the Pagans] means (polythiest, idolaters, pagans.) -It is clear that the ayah of the Noble Qur'an was making reference to the polythiest, the pagans and idolaters. Those who associate partners with Almighty Allah(swt), and not referring to the whole of humanity.. And when we turn to the Tafsir(s) we see in which way that the pagans were 'unclean'. (see below) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn O you who believe, the idolaters are indeed unclean, [they are] filth, on account of their inner vileness, so do not let them come near the Sacred Mosque, that is, let them not enter the Sanctuary, after this year of theirs, year 9 of the Hijra. If you fear impoverishment, poverty, as a result of the cessation of their commerce with you, God will surely enrich you from His bounty, if He will: and He indeed enriched them through conquests and [the imposition of] the jizya. God is Knowing, Wise. (source) The fact that the Pagans are unclean according to their inner vileness is further exhausted in the following Sahih Hadith narration. (see below) [ATTENTION:] The Hadith narration below is EXTENSIVELY long, so the last paragraph dealing with this specific issue is the only part that was posted. The FULL hadith does not contort or contradict or deflect the position of its statement regarding the 'spiritual uncleaniness' of the Pagans.

The Book Pertaining to Repentance and Exhortation to Repentance (Kitab AlTauba) [Sahih Muslim :: Book 37 : Hadith 6670 ] "...........Certainly, Allah has turned in Mercy to the Prophet and the emigrants and the helpers who followed him in the hour of hardship after the hearts of a part of them were

about to deviate; then He turned to them in mercy. Surely, to them He is Compassionate, Merciful and (He turned in Mercy) to the three who were left behind until the earth despite its vastness became strait for them and their souls were also straitened to them." And this revelation reached up to the (words):" O you who believe, develop God consciousness, and be with the truthful" (ix. 117-118). Ka'b said: By Allah, since Allah directed me to Islam there has been no blessing more significant for me than this truth of mine which I spoke to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and if I were to tell a lie I would have been ruined as were ruined those who told lies, for in regard to those who told lies Allah used harshest words used for anyone as He descended revelation (and the words of Allah are):" They will swear by Allah to you when you return to them so that you may leave them alone. So leave them alone. Surely, they are unclean and their resort is Hell, recompense for what they earned. They will swear to you that you may be pleased with them but if you are pleased with them, yet surely Allah is not pleased with the transgressing people" (ix. 95-96). K'ab said that the matter of us three persons was deferred as compared with those who took an oath in the presence of Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) and he accepted their allegiance and sought forgiveness for them and Allah did not give any decision in regard to us. It was Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, Who gave decisions in our case, three who remained behind. (The words of the Qur'an)" the three who were left behind" do not mean that we remained back from Jihad but these imply that He kept our matter behind them who took oath and presented excuse before Him. This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Zuhri with the same chain of transmitters. -In fact, this partial narration of the FULL has the complete context of the passage. The immediate context of the Hadith, is about the Pagans lying and making false oaths to Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) and being untrue in them, therby, being 'Unclean' Ali Sina, in his intentional deception has had an epic fail regarding this. He was aware that the majority of non-Muslims are not students of the Noble Qur'an and Hadith and would not take the time to evaluate the claims made by this daffy individual, rather they would take it at face value instead of taking it in its complete over-all context. Ali Sina, then followed up the above claim by stating the following; and one should not befriend them. I still have a copy of the Farsi translation of the Quran I used to often read from. One of the underlined verses is: O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as awliya (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but awliya to one anotherQ.5: 51 I had difficulty understanding the wisdom of such a verse. I wondered why I should not befriend this wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing me their hospitality than just making me feel at home. I thought they were true Muslims and I tried to raise the subject of religion hoping they would see the truth of Islam and

embrace it. But they were not interested and politely changed the subject. Again, he is the master of butchery, he takes passages of the Noble Qur'an out of their context and agreed upon meaning. Which brings us to his next fallacy; previously he committed the fallacies of 'Poisoning the Well', 'Appeal to Novelty' and now 'Attacking a Strawman'. He is debating against a position that the Noble Qur'an does not represent. Lets look at the passage and elucidate on it with evidence. (see below) 51. O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. (Surah Al-Mai'dah 5:51/ Yusuf Ali Translation) -From the above passage, it would appear that Almighty Allah(swt) is commanding that we Muslims are to avoid making friendship with any Jew or Christian. However, when we read it in the context, it declares more so that we take them not as protectors. In which context are we not to take them as 'Friends' and 'Protectors'? The context is given clearly when we turn to the passages following it.. (as shown below) 49. And this (He commands): Judge thou between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, but beware of them lest they beguile thee from any of that (teaching) which Allah hath sent down to thee. And if they turn away, be assured that for some of their crime it is Allah's purpose to punish them. And truly most men are rebellious. 50. Do they then seek after a judgment of (the days of) ignorance? But who, for a people whose faith is assured, can give better judgment than Allah. The above narrations affirm that Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) is to Judge between the people, based on what Almighty Allah(swt) has revealed (i.e. the Noble Qur'an) and the Prophet(saaw) is commanded to 'CAUTION AGAINST THEM' lest they 'BEGUILE HIM' from any part of the instruction of the revelation (i.e. the Noble Qur'an). Almighty Allah(swt) then questions them concerning their reasoning and rejection of the Messenger(saaw) when He(swt) asks; "Do they then seek after a judgment of (the days of) ignorance?" These preceeding statements are vital in determining the pre-caution that Muslims should have against deviance and ignorance. This is confirmed more strongly in the next passages (see below) 51. O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and

protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust. 52. Those in whose hearts is a disease - thou seest how eagerly they run about amongst them, saying: "We do fear lest a change of fortune bring us disaster." Ah! perhaps Allah will give (thee) victory, or a decision according to His will. Then will they repent of the thoughts which they secretly harboured in their hearts. 53. And those who believe will say: "Are these the men who swore their strongest oaths by Allah, that they were with you?" All that they do will be in vain, and they will fall into (nothing but) ruin. 54. O ye who believe! if any from among you turn back from his Faith, soon will Allah produce a people whom He will love as they will love Him,- lowly with the believers, mighty against the rejecters, fighting in the way of Allah, and never afraid of the reproaches of such as find fault. That is the grace of Allah, which He will bestow on whom He pleaseth. And Allah encompasseth all, and He knoweth all things. In verses (51) Almighty Allah(swt) instructs that we take not the Jews and Christians as friends and protectors because they are only friends and protectors of one another. So here Almighty Allah(swt) is describing the nature of the Jews and Christians at that time who were against the Muslims. Proof of this is found in verses (52-54) when Almighty Allah(swt) questions the spiritual integrity of those Muslims who have a disease in their heart (hypocrisy or disbelief) whereupon they flee to the Jews and Christians and take them as friends in fear that the Muslims will eventually suffer a loss or be overcome. Almighty Allah(swt) then promises to replace the current Muslims (in whose heart is the disease) with more pious worshippers who will be obedient to Him(swt) and fighting against the rejecters of truth. The deal is then sealed in the following passage concerning the full nature of these Jews and Christians (& Pagans) (see below) 55. Your (real) friends are (no less than) Allah, His Messenger, and the (fellowship of) believers,- those who establish regular prayers and regular charity, and they bow down humbly (in worship). 56. As to those who turn (for friendship) to Allah, His Messenger, and the (fellowship of) believers,- it is the fellowship of Allah that must certainly triumph. 57. O ye who believe! take not for friends and protectors those who take your religion for a mockery or sport,- whether among those who received the Scripture before you, or among those who reject Faith; but fear ye Allah, if ye have faith (indeed). 58. When ye proclaim your call to prayer they take it (but) as mockery and sport; that is because they are a people without understanding. (Surah Al-Maidah 5:51-58/ Yusuf Ali Translation) In the above context, it is not a general command from Almighty Allah(swt), but a conditional command. Almighty Allah(swt) then declares that the Muslims 'TRUE FRIENDS' are the ones who establish regular prayer (As-Salat) and regular charity (Zaakat) and bow down in worship (sajdah) of Almighty Allah(swt). He(swt) describes that the Muslims should hold firm to the fellowship of Him(swt) and His

Messenger(saaw), and in this fellowship they will be successful. Almighty Allah(Swt) continues to say that we should not take for friends and protectorsthose who take our religion for a mockeryand sport (whether from the Jews and Christians) or those who reject faith. Almighty Allah(swt) points out, that when the call to prayer is established by the Muslims (Adhaan) the unbelievers mock and jest at its calling, because they are people with no understanding (of Islam). (Please Visit our following article(s) for more information concerning Relationships with Jews and Christians according to Islam) * Muslims Are Allowed to Befriend Jews and Christians * Muslims Are Allowed to Marry Jews and Christians * Muslims Are Allowed to Pray Inside a Synagogue or Church (no idols or pictures) Ali Sina, then decided to engage in his 4th logical fallacy of his 'Apostasy Tale' which is 'Appealing to Emotion'. This fallacy states that favorable emotions are associated with X, therefore X must be correct. (see below) "I had difficulty understanding the wisdom of such a verse. I wondered why I should not befriend this wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing me their hospitality than just making me feel at home. I thought they were true Muslims -In his above statement, we learn that Ali Sina intends on moving the hearts of his readers (falliciously) in place of logic and reason. He says; "I wondered why I should not befriend this wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing me their hospitality than just making me feel at home. I thought they were "true Muslims" The above quote, demonstrates the troubling high level of inconsistency and lies put forth by this short-sighted critic. Ali Sina emphatically stated that the elderly couple was welcoming with no other motive other than to be kind, "I THOUGHT they were "true Muslims". Ali Sina we at WIO have a few questions for you. Previously in your 'Story' in the very same paragraph, you said the following; "In Italy people drink wine and eat pork, but they were more hospitable, friendlier, and less hypocritical than Muslims. I noticed people were willing to help without expecting something in return." PREMISE#1 * People in Italy are more hospitable, friendlier, and less hypocritical than Muslims. PREMISE#2

* People were willing to help without expecting something in return. PREMISE#3 * The wonderful elderly couple who had no ulterior motives in showing their hospitality than just making you feel at home, THEY MUST BE TRUE MUSLIMS. CONCLUSION: If the people in Italy are more hospitable and friendly and less hypocritical, and they are also willing to help without expecting something in return. The wonderful elderly couple had no ulterior motives but were making you feel at home, they must be true Muslims. Does this mean that 'TRUE MUSLIMS' according to you, are hospitable, friendly less hypocritical than other Muslims (who must be corrupt, as we demonstrated earlier).? or Does this mean that 'TRUE MUSLIMS' are corrupted, and the elderly couple were Muslims doing those hospitable things for you , and your a dishonest hypocrite.? Then this goofy and inane individual followed up that paragraph with the same insensate declaration he made before. (see below) I tried to raise the subject of religion hoping they would see the truth of Islam and embrace it. But they were not interested and politely changed the subject. -Ali Sina, why would anyone trust you with Islam when your being openly dishonest and deceiving in your 'Fairy Tale Apostasy Story', have you no shame? (continue reading)

(Ali Sina) said;

I hung around with my Muslim friends and noticed that most of them lived a very immoral life of double standards. Most of them found girlfriends and slept with them. That was very un-Islamic, or so I thought at that time. What bothered me most was the fact that they did not value these girls as real human beings who deserved respect. These girls were not Muslim girls and therefore were used just for sex. This attitude was not general. Those who made less show of religiosity were more respectful and sincere towards their western girlfriends and some even loved them and wanted to marry them. Paradoxically. those who were more religious were less faithful towards their girlfriends. I always thought that true Islam is what is right. If something is immoral, unethical, dishonest or cruel, it cannot be Islam. I could not see how the behavior of these immoral

and callous Muslims could be the result of what was taught in Islam. Years later I realized that the truth is exactly the opposite. I found many verses that were disturbing and made me revise my whole opinion of Islam. As I saw it, the tragedy was that the very same people who lived unethically and immorally were the ones who called themselves Muslims, said their prayers, fasted and were the first to defend Islam angrily if anyone raised a question about it. They where the ones who would lose their temper and start a fight if someone dared to say a word against Islam.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina's continous aspirations toward disproving Islam through the actions of Muslims is laughably pathetic. One cannot equate the actions of Muslims with the Religion of Islam, and if one is going to judge the actions by any Muslims, then they should do it by the example of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). He stated; "I hung around with my Muslim friends and noticed that most of them lived a very immoral life of double standards. Most of them found girlfriends and slept with them. That was very un-Islamic, or so I thought at that time." Ali Sina has failed epically in providing any references from authentic Islamic sources (i.e. Qur'an, Sahih Hadith) to back up his claims that the actions of these Muslims is acceptable in Islam. Which brings WIO to our next observation, Ali Sina has engaged in his 5th logical fallacy which is "Hasty Generalization" which stipulates that because of the actions of some people who belong to this specific group, all people who belong to that group must be like those 'some persons'. (Please Visit our article(s) for more information on the prohibition of pre-marital sex in Islam) * Prohibition of Pre-Marital Sex in Islam * Punishment for Committing Adultery Furthermore, the farsightedness of Ali Sina is almost paralyzing to rational thought and Islamic legislation. He stated; "What bothered me most was the fact that they did not value these girls as real human beings who deserved respect. These girls were not Muslim girls and therefore were used just for sex. This attitude was not general. Those who made less show of religiosity were more respectful and sincere towards their western girlfriends and some even loved

them and wanted to marry them. Paradoxically. those who were more religious were less faithful towards their girlfriends. I always thought that true Islam is what is right." Ultimately, Ali Sina agrees that this attitude of mistreating women was not 'GENERAL'. Ali Sina continually contradicts himself just to suffice his agenda. He repeatedly declares that 'the most religious or very religious' Muslims, are the ones who are engaging in these un-Islamic acts. How is it that these people are religious yet are engaging in these acts? In fact, such outright disobedience of the commands of Almighty Allah(swt) and His rasooul(saaw) would just demonstrated those 'religious Muslims' hypocrisy. (Please Visit our article(s) on Hypocrisy in Islam, for more information) * The Signs of A Hypocrite - Hypocrisy Is Worse Than Disbelief * Hypocrites During The Time of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) * How To Avoid Being A Hypocrite - Establishing True Faith No Muslim should have a girlfriend or boyfriend in Islam as it is prohibited. (Please Visit our article(s) on Pre-Marital sex, and Non-Marriage Relations for more information) * Prohibition of Non-Marriage Relations (i.e. Boyfriends, Girlfriends) * Prohibition of Pre-Marital Sex in Islam FURTHERMORE, He stated; "If something is immoral, unethical, dishonest or cruel, it cannot be Islam. I could not see how the behavior of these immoral and callous Muslims could be the result of what was taught in Islam. Years later I realized that the truth is exactly the opposite. I found many verses that were disturbing and made me revise my whole opinion of Islam. As I saw it, the tragedy was that the very same people who lived unethically and immorally were the ones who called themselves Muslims, said their prayers, fasted and were the first to defend Islam angrily if anyone raised a question about it. They where the ones who would lose their temper and start a fight if someone dared to say a word against Islam." We would aprreciate it if Ali Sina would be so kind as to show us those verses which encourage the aforementioned attributes of Muslims which he said, he found to be disturbing. Hopefully, he will be able to provide us with verses from the Noble Qur'an which declare that Muslims should be 'Immoral, Unethical, Dishonest, and Cruel', then we will begin to address each allegation. Then he accuses those Muslims who were most devout in their religious duties as the first

to defend Islam angrily if anyone raised a question about it. First thing to be noted, is that anger is a instinctive emotion like sadness or happiness. Also, who is to say that the person who asks the questions to the Muslims has good intentions, or isn't bashing, or being rude and disrespectful in the manner in which they ask to question. Surely such behavior would anger and upset any Muslim. However, to the contrary, Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhin wasalaam) instructed that one should not become Angry and furious. (see below) Good Manners and Form (Al-Adab) ( Sahih Al- Bukhari :: Book 8 :: Volume 73 :: Hadith 137 ) Narrated Abu Huraira: A man said to the Prophet , "Advise me! "The Prophet said, "Do not become angry and furious." The man asked (the same) again and again, and the Prophet said in each case, "Do not become angry and furious." When someone is angry, they are not utilizing reason and make bad decisions. And for this reason, Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) instructed that one is not to make a judgment when they are angry. (see below) Judgments (Ahkaam) ( Sahih Al-Bukhari :: Book 9 :: Volume 89 :: Hadith 272 ) Narrated 'Abdur Rahman bin Abi Bakra: Abu Bakra wrote to his son who was in Sijistan: 'Do not judge between two persons when you are angry, for I heard the Prophet saying, "A judge should not judge between two persons while he is in an angry mood." (Please Visit our article(s) on Good Manners and Patience for more information) * Physical and Spiritual Benefit of Being Patient -Avoiding Anger The Noble Qur'an also prescribes the method in which we should invite people to the way of Islam, in the following ayah; 125. Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance. (Surah An-Nahl 16:125/ Yusuf Ali Translation) (Please Visit our article(s) on how to give correct Da'wah for more information)

* Character and Manner of Giving Da'wah

(Ali Sina) said;

Once I befriended a young Iranian man at the university restaurant, later introducing him to two other Muslim friends of mine. We were all about the same age. He was an erudite, virtuous, wise, young man. My other two friends and I were captivated by his charm and high moral values We used to wait for him and sit next to him during lunch hour, as we always learned something from him. We used to eat a lot of spaghetti and risotto and craved a good Persian ghorme sabzi and chelow. Our friend said his mother sent him some dried vegetables and invited us to his house the next Sunday for lunch. We found his two-room apartment very clean, unlike the houses of other guys. He made us a delicious ghorme sabzi which we ate with great gusto and then sat back chatting and sipping our tea. It was then we noticed his Bahai books. When we asked about them, he said he was a Bahai. That did not bother me at all, but on the way home my two friends said they did not wish to continue their friendship with him. I was surprised and asked why. They said that being a Bahai makes him najis and had they known he was a Bahai, they would not have befriended him. I was puzzled and enquired why they thought he was najis if we all were complementing him on his cleanliness. We all agreed he was a morally superior man than all of the Muslim young men we knew, so why this sudden change of attitude? Their response was very disturbing. They said the name itself had something in it that made them dislike this religion. They asked me if I knew why everyone disliked the Bahais. I told them I didnt know, and that I liked everyone. But since they disliked the Bahais, perhaps they should explain their reasons. They did not know why! This man was the first Bahai they knew this well, and he was an exemplary man. I wanted to know the reason for their dislike. There was no particular reason, they said. Its just they know that Bahais are bad. I am happy I did not continue my friendship with these two bigots. From them I learned how prejudice is formed and operates.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina is infallable when it comes to dishonesty and logical fallacy. He again has demonstrated his 3rd fallacy (3 of 5) which we learned earlier and that is 'Appealing to Emotion'. The Muslims who he claims didn't like the guy because he was of the Baha'i faith, is their personal perspective. Islam (Ahlul Sunnah wa Jamat) as a whole acknowledges the Baha'i faith as a (false, innovation), which was created by an average man and not a Messenger of Almighty Allah(swt). It is not appropriate to declare that all people of the Baha'i faith are evil or bad, because

some of them may be pious and righteous even more so then some Muslims. However, the underlining reason why we as Muslims don't acknowledge the Baha'i faith as a true religion and its followers as unbelievers is because they contradict the teachings and integrity of Islam. (Please Visit our article(s) of Muhammad(saaw) as the final Prophet and Messenger for more information) * Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) - The Seal of the Prophets * Islam The Religion for Mankind (continue reading)

(Ali Sina) said;

Later I realized the prejudices and hatred that Muslims harbor against almost all nonMuslims is not the result of any misinterpretation of the teachings of the Quran, but is because this book teaches hate and encourages prejudice. Those Muslims who go to the mosques and listen to the sermons of the mullahs are affected. There are many verses in the Quran that call believers to hate non-believers, fight them, call them najis, subdue and humiliate them, chop off their heads and limbs, crucify them, and kill them wherever they find them.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina! When will you stop lying and being deceptive to your readers? He is making the same erroneous claims agianst Islam that have been debunked time and itme again effortlessly. This shameless human being has no withdrawl from misrepresenting Islam with his fallacious statements. (Please Visit our following article(s) for more information debunking all of the above claims.) * Fighting Against The Disbelievers - The Criterior for War * Equality in Islam -Unification Through Purification

(Ali Sina) said;

I Learned the truth from the Quran I left the religion on the backburner for several years.

Not that my views about religion had changed or I didnt consider myself religious any more. I just had so much to do that expending time on religion had become scarce. Meanwhile I learned more about democracy, human rights and other values, like equality of rights between men and women, and I liked what I learned. Did I pray? Whenever I could, but not fanatically. After all, I was living and working in a Western country and did not want to look too different. One day, I decided that it was time to deepen my knowledge of Islam and read the Quran from cover to cover. I found an Arabic copy of the Quran with an English translation. Previously I read only bits and pieces of the Quran. This time I read all of it. I would read a verse in Arabic, then its English translation, then refer back to the Arabic, and did not read the next verse until I was completely satisfied I understood the Arabic. It didnt take long before I came upon verses I found hard to accept. One of these verses was: Allah forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with Allah is to devise a sin Most heinous indeed. 4:48 I found it hard to accept that Gandhi would burn in hell forever because he was a polytheist with no hope of redemption, while a Muslim murderer could hope to receive Allahs forgiveness. This raised a disturbing question. Why is Allah so desperate to be known as the only God? If there is no other god but him, what is the fuss? Against whom is he competing? Why should he even care whether anyone knows him and praises him or not.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina is silly and abnoxiously ignorant and disturbingly arrogant the more and more he relates his 'Fairy Tale' of Apostasy. He claims that he has "put Islam on the backburner for several years", well of course he did, he wasn't a Muslim to begin with. Thats like a Muslim saying; "I put Buddhism on the backburner for several years", while consciously knowing that they had no religious or practical affiliation with Buddhism. Then he says; "When did I Pray? Whenever I could, but not fanatically" We are curious as to what 'Not Fanatically' means. Does that mean he didn't pray 5 times a Day? That he didn't pray with other Muslims in the Masjid? That he prayed whenever it was convenient? Next he says, that it didn' take him long to come across verses which he found hard to accept and that is that Almighty Allah(swt) will not forgive the sin of Shirk (associating partners in worship with Him). He found it hard to believe that someone like 'Ghandi' would burn in the Hell-Fire for eternity for being a polythiest with no hope of redemption, while a Muslim murdered could hope to receive Allah's forgiveness.

At this point it has become exhaustingly clear that Ali Sina has no acknowledgment of Islamic Theology, Tawheed, or anything for that matter. The most fundamental aspect of Islam 'Tawheed' and Ali Sina can't understand why Almighty Allah(swt) would punish someone eternally for associating partners in worship with Him? (Please Visit our following articles on Tawheed and the Oneness of Almighty Allah(swt) ) * Tawheed -The Oneness of Almighty Allah(swt) * The Absolute Oneness of Almighty God(swt) in the Bible * The 99 Attributes of Almighty Allah(swt) - Incomparable in Nature * The Punishment for Associating Partners in Worship with Almighty Allah(swt) Then Ali Sina begins insulting Almighty Allah(swt) by asking "Why is He so desperate? ". Almighty Allah(swt) needs not compete with anyone because He is above all the things in which the disbelievers attribute to Him. Furthermore, he asks why He(swt) should care if anyone praises Him or not. This is the very reason why the Human beings and Jinn were created, to Worship and Obey Almighty Allah(swt). (Please Visit our following articles on The Purpose of Man/Jinn and Islam) * The Purpose of Man and Jinn * Islam The Religion for Mankind

(Ali Sina) said;

I learned about the size of this universe. Light, which travels at a speed of 300 thousand kilometers per second takes 20 billion years to reach us from the galaxies that are at the edges of the universe. How many galaxies are there? How many stars are there in these galaxies? How many planets are there in this universe? These thoughts were mindboggling. If Allah is the creator of this vast universe, why he is so concerned about being known as the only god by a bunch of apes living on a small planet down the Milky Way? Now that I had lived in the West, had many western friends who were kind to me, liked me, opened their hearts and homes to me, and accepted me as their friend, it was really hard to accept that Allah didnt want me to befriend them. Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah 3:28, Isnt Allah the creator of the unbelievers too? Isnt he the god of everybody? Why he should be so unkind to the unbelievers? Wouldnt it be better if Muslims befriended unbelievers and taught them Islam by a good example? By keeping ourselves aloof and distant from unbelievers, the gap of misunderstandings will never be bridged. How in the world will unbelievers learn about Islam if we do not associate with them? These were the questions I kept asking myself. The answer to these questions came in a very disconcerting verse. Allahs order was to, slay them wherever ye catch them.

(Q.2:191)

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

As mentioned earlier, the following articles of ours can be reviewed for more information regarding the importance of worshipping Almighty Allah(swt) and not associating partners in worship with Him. (see below) * Tawheed -The Oneness of Almighty Allah(swt) * The Absolute Oneness of Almighty God(swt) in the Bible * The 99 Attributes of Almighty Allah(swt) - Incomparable in Nature * The Punishment for Associating Partners in Worship with Almighty Allah(swt) Ali Sina deceptively post the ayah of the Noble Qur'an (3:28) and confidently refuses to comprehend what the passage is saying. Let us anaylze the passage and determine what it is actually saying. 28. Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah. except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah. (Surah Al-Imran 3:28/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn Let not the believers take the disbelievers as patrons, rather than, that is, instead of, the believers for whoever does that, that is, [whoever] takes them as patrons, does not belong to, the religion of, God in anyway unless you protect yourselves against them, as a safeguard (tuqtan, as a safeguard, is the verbal noun from taqiyyatan), that is to say, [unless] you fear something, in which case you may show patronage to them through words, but not in your hearts: this was before the hegemony of Islam and [the dispensation] applies to any individual residing in a land with no say in it. God warns you, He instills fear in you, of His Self, [warning] that He may be wrathful with you if you take them as patrons; and to God is the journeys end, the return, and He will requite you. (source) when we review the passage of the Noble verse, along with the Tafsir (Legal Exegesis), we learn that Almighty Allah(swt) is not ordering us to AVOID TAKING disbelievers as friends, but is instructing us not to take them as friends IN PLACE OF BELIEVERS.

This is the case because when Muslims are living under non-Muslim government, we are to be united in the instruction and guidance of Almighty Allah(swt) and Muhammad(saaw) and not to befriend the non-Muslims govenrment (to appease them) in place of the Muslims. Furthermore, as we mentioned earlier, for more information demonstrating that Muslims can befriend non-Muslims, please visit our following articles. * Muslims Are Allowed to Befriend Jews and Christians * Muslims Are Allowed to Marry Jews and Christians * Muslims Are Allowed to Pray Inside a Synagogue or Church (no idols or pictures) Its kind of absurd for Ali Sina to promote this idea that Muslims cannot befriend nonMuslims, but yet Muslim men are permitted to marry to the Ahlul Kitab (people of the book) [i.e. Jews and Christians]. We can have a Jewish or Christian wife, but she can't be our friend? Also, we Muslims are commanded to build this bridge between Islam and the nonMuslims, and we do this by giving Da'wah and inviting them to Islam. In the Noble Qur'an, Almighty Allah(swt) has provided us with the appropriate well mannered way of inviting the non-Muslims to Islam and He(swt) says in the following ayah; 125. Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance. (Surah An-Nahl 16:125/ Yusuf Ali Translation) In a failed last attempt, Ali Sina tries to get away with taking a passage cmpletely outof context after misrepresentating the previous one. He states the reason why Almighty Allah(swt) prohibits the friendship of Muslims and non-Muslims is because He wants us to slay them wherever we find them (i.e. S2:191). Why does Ali Sina avoid the immediate context of each passage which he quotes? Does he fear that he will be exposed for his dishonesty if he did? Here is the ayah in its complete context... 190. Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for Allah loveth not transgressors. 191. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have Turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; but fight them not at the Sacred Mosque, unless they (first) fight you there; but if they fight you, slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. 192. But if they cease, Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

193. And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah. but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression. * Tafsir al-Jalalayn And slay them wherever you come upon them, and expel them from where they expelled you, that is, from Mecca, and this was done after the Conquest of Mecca; sedition, their idolatry, is more grievous, more serious, than slaying, them in the Sacred Enclosure or while in a state of pilgrimage inviolability, the thing that you greatly feared. But fight them not by the Sacred Mosque, that is, in the Sacred Enclosure, until they should fight you there; then if they fight you, there, slay them, there (a variant reading drops the alif in the three verbs [sc. wa-l taqtilhum, hatt yaqtulkum, fa-in qatalkum, so that the sense is slaying in all three, and not just fighting]) such, killing and expulsion, is the requital of disbelievers. (continue reading) (source) When taken in complete, we learn that the Muslims were expelled from Mecca (and all of their properties) and had to migrate to Medina for safety. The non-Muslims oppressed and persecuted the Muslims in and out of pilgrimage. It is a conditional method for expelling the falsehood and oppression, so the Muslims were rightly commanded to fight and slay THOSE OPPRESSORS until the oppression was over. Almighty Allah(swt) is not Merciless, and does not command the Muslims to annihilate them completely, but until they cease in their oppression of the Muslims. Almighty Allah(swt) then commands that there be NO HOSTILITY except against those who are oppressors. (Please Visit our following article(s) for more information on oppression and persecution) * Prescribed Fighting Against Oppression and Oppressors * The Persecution and Oppression of The Muslims (please continue reading)

(Ali Sina) said;

I thought of my own friends, remembering their kindnesses and love for me, and wondered how in the world a true god would ask anyone to kill another human being just because he does not believe. That seemed absurd, yet this concept was repeated so often in the Quran there was no doubt about it. In verse 8:65, Allah tells his prophet: O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers. I wondered why would Allah send a messenger to make war? Shouldnt God teach us to

love each other and be tolerant towards each others beliefs? And if Allah is really so concerned about making people believe in him to the extent that he would kill them if they dont believe, why would he not kill them himself? Why does he ask us to do his dirty work? Are we Allahs hit men? Although I knew of Jihad and never questioned it before, I found it hard to accept that God would resort to imposing such violent measures on people. What was more shocking was the cruelty of Allah in dealing with unbelievers. I will instill terror into the hearts of the unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their fingertips off them 8:12 It seemed Allah was not just satisfied with killing unbelievers, he enjoyed torturing them before killing them. Smiting peoples heads from above their necks and chopping their fingertips were very cruel acts. Would God really give such orders? And yet the worst is what he promised to do with unbelievers in the other world: These two antagonists dispute with each other about their Lord: But those who deny (their Lord),- for them will be cut out a garment of Fire: over their heads will be poured out boiling water. With it will be scalded what is within their bodies, as well as (their) skins. In addition there will be maces of iron (to punish) them. Every time they wish to get away therefrom, from anguish, they will be forced back therein, and (it will be said), Taste ye the Penalty of Burning! 22:19-22

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Just when we thought that Ali Sina couldn't spew anymore gallons of hogwash in his statements and interpretations of the Noble Qur'an, he debunks our beliefs of him and completely misrepresents the context of the following passages. (NOTE: This is the same individual who claimed to have read the complete Qur'an from cover to cover.) [see below] "One day, I decided that it was time to deepen my knowledge of Islam and read the Quran from cover to cover. I found an Arabic copy of the Quran with an English translation. Previously I read only bits and pieces of the Quran. This time I read all of it. I would read a verse in Arabic, then its English translation, then refer back to the Arabic, and did not read the next verse until I was completely satisfied I understood the Arabic." Under this premise, it would only be appropriate to put his 'Knowledge' of the Noble Qur'an to the test. He said; "I thought of my own friends, remembering their kindnesses and love for me, and

wondered how in the world a true god would ask anyone to kill another human being just because he does not believe. That seemed absurd, yet this concept was repeated so often in the Quran there was no doubt about it. In verse 8:65, Allah tells his prophet: O Prophet! rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers. I wondered why would Allah send a messenger to make war? Shouldnt God teach us to love each other and be tolerant towards each others beliefs? And if Allah is really so concerned about making people believe in him to the extent that he would kill them if they dont believe, why would he not kill them himself? Why does he ask us to do his dirty work? Are we Allahs hit men?" This goofy man is only further demonstrating how he is scriptually bankrupt concerning the teachings of Islam, he also is guilty of previous (repeated) logical fallacy "Appealing to Emotion". By stating that, he remembers his friends kindness and love, then asks 'Why would a true god' ask anyone to kill another human being. This means that he believes his non-Muslim friends are correct concerning their religious and spirirtual lifestyle because they were kind and loving to him. He also accuses Almighty Allah(swt) of commanding the killing of non-Muslims, because they do not believe. We challenge Ali Sina to produce one unambiguous illuminous order from Almighty Allah(swt) commanding the Muslims to kill the nonMuslims because they will not believe. Then he quotes the ayah of the Noble Qur'an where Almighty Allah(swt) instructs the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) to rouse the believers to the fighting of unbelievers. Then asks, 'Why would Allah send a messenger to make war?' The context of the passage is clear in the Noble Qur'an. We will now examine exactly why the Prophet(saaw) was commanded to rouse the believers. The Muslims were hesitant against fighting the disbelievers because they were larger in number and fearful of the end result (i.e. their properties and lives) [see below] 216. Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:216/ Yusuf ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn Prescribed for you, obligatory [for you], is fighting, disbelievers, though it be hateful to you, by nature, because of the hardship involved. Yet it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you; and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you: because the soul inclines towards those desires which result in its destruction and its

rejection of the religious obligations that would bring about its happiness. Perhaps, then, even if you are averse to it, you will find much good in fighting, as a result of victory, booty, martyrdom or reward; while, if you were to reject fighting, even if you would like to do so, you will find much evil, because then you may be subjugated, impoverished and denied the reward; God knows, what is good for you, and you know, this, not, so strive in what He commands you. (source) -Almighty Allah(swt) knows the hearts of all of His creatures and knew that the Muslims were fearful of fighting against the non-Muslims, and for this reason the following was revealed. 65. O Messenger. rouse the Believers to the fight. If there are twenty amongst you, patient and persevering, they will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, they will vanquish a thousand of the Unbelievers: for these are a people without understanding. (Surah Al-Anfal 8:65/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn O Prophet, urge on, exhort, the believers to fight, the disbelievers. If there be twenty of you, steadfast, they will overcome two hundred, of them. If there be (read as yakun or takun) a hundred of you, they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, for they are a people who do not understand (this [sentence] is predicative, but functions as an imperative, in other words, let the twenty of you fight the two hundred [of them], and the hundred [of you], the thousand [of them], and let them stand firm against them; but when they became numerous this was abrogated by Gods saying): (source) Then this foolish critic asks 'If Allah is so concerned with making people believe, to the extent that He would have them killied. Then why would He not kill them Himself?' Such a question is dishonest in its intentions and integrity. Ali Sina has engaged in his 6th logical fallacy, which is "False Dilemma". He implies that because Almighty Allah(swt) did not guide the believers, it becomes obligatory on Him to kill them. Firstly, Almighty Allah(swt) is fully Competent over the whole of creation and has created Mankind and Jinn to Worship and Obey Him, and does not need to resort to anihilation to fulfill his purpose. Furthermore, If Almighty Allah(swt) intended on guiding the whole of humanity (and Jinn) He could've with Great ease. (see below) 99. If it had been thy Lord's will, they would all have believed,- all who are on earth! wilt thou then compel mankind, against their will, to believe!

(Surah Yunus 10:99/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Also, Almighty Allah(swt) is full of Might and Power, over the whole of creation, and doesn't have to resort to the human beings to destroy or bring an end to a people. (see below) 133. If it were His will, He could destroy you, o mankind, and create another race; for He hath power this to do. (Surah An-Nisa 4:133/ Yusuf Ali Translation) With this amount of scriptual ignorance, can anyone continue to take Ali Sina seriously? Is this the same person who said that he read the "complete Qur'an COVER to COVER"? When will his blatant lies stop? (please continue reading below)

(Ali Sina) said;

How could the creator of this universe be so cruel? I was shocked to learn that Quran tells Muslims to: kill unbelievers wherever they find them (Q.2:191), murder them and treat them harshly (Q.9:123), fight them, (Q.8:65), until no other religion than Islam is left (Q.2:193) humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax if they are Christians or Jews, (Q.9:29) slay them if they are Pagans (Q.9:5), crucify, or cut off their hands and feet, expel them from the land in disgrace. And as if this were not enough, they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter (Q.5:34), not befriend their own fathers or brothers if they are not believers (Q.9:23), (Q.3:28), kill their own family in the battles of Badr and Uhud and asks Muslims to strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q.25:52), be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q.66:9). How can any sensible person remain unmoved when he or she finds the Quran saying: strike off the heads of the unbelievers then after a wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives (Q.47:4). I was also shocked to learn the Quran denies freedom of belief for all and clearly states Islam is the only acceptable religion (Q.3:85). Allah relegates those who do not believe in the Quran to hell (Q.5:11) and calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (Q.9:28). He says unbelievers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q.14:17). Further, As for the unbelievers, for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over

their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods (Q.22:9). How sadistic! The book of Allah says women are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to beat them (Q.4:34), and that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q.66:10). It says men have an advantage over women (Q.2:228). It not only denies women equal right to their inheritance (Q.4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their testimony alone is not admissible in court (Q.2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness, which of course is a joke. Rapists don't rape in the presence of witnesses. But the most shocking verse is where Allah allows Muslims to rape women captured in wars even if they are married before being captured (Q.4:24) (Q.4:3). The holy prophet raped the prettiest women he captured in his raids on the same day he killed their husbands and loved ones. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bengali women in 1971 and massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are un-Islamic. This is why the prison guards in the Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah. The whole Quran is full of verses that teach killing of unbelievers and how Allah would torture them after they die. There are no lessons on morality, justice, honesty, or love. The only message of the Quran is to believe in Allah and his messenger. The Quran coaxes people with celestial rewards of unlimited sex with fair houris in paradise and threatens them with blazing fires of hell. When the Quran speaks of righteousness, it does not mean righteousness as we understand it, but it means belief in Allah and his messenger. A Muslim can be a killer and murder non-Muslims and yet be a righteous person. Good actions are secondary. Belief in Allah and his messenger are the ultimate purpose of a persons life. After reading the Quran I became greatly depressed. It was hard to accept it all. At first I denied and searched for esoteric meanings to these cruel verses of the Quran, all in vain. There was no misunderstanding! The Quran was overwhelmingly inhumane. Of course it contained a lot of scientific heresies and absurdities, but they were not what impacted me the most. It was the violence of this book that really jolted me and shook the foundation of my belief.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

In his final showdown, this is where the well versed magician pulls all of his tricks out of his 'Fairy Tale' hat. Ali Sina post a series of verses from the Noble Qur'an and attributes them to Islam being filled with hate and violence. Although we have exhausted the 6 logical fallacies, and dozens of Islamic errors, I think we can take this a bit farther with knowledge. We will debunk all of the 'wild claims' made by this daffy Emperor and bring his 'Air Castle' to the ground. He said;

How could the creator of this universe be so cruel? I was shocked to learn that Quran tells Muslims to: kill unbelievers wherever they find them (Q.2:191),
*We already addressed the supposed issues with (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:191), please scroll up. When you read it in its context (verse 190-193) it will become clear to the readers, that this was intended for the disbelievers because they were oppressing and persecuting the Muslims and drove them out of Mecca (and their property).

murder them and treat them harshly (Q.9:123),

*Ali Sina, will not cease in his lies and deceptions. He has no shameless bone in his body and is the King of ignorance and humiliation. We will review the passage which he quoted and we will see if it declares that Muslims should "murder them and treat them harshly". (NOTE: Its not uncommon for Ali Sina to completely butcher the context of the Noble Qur'an, lets review the passage in its immediate context and see what its making reference to. Then we will demonstrate that no where in the passage say to "murder" anyone. 120. It was not fitting for the people of Medina and the Bedouin Arabs of the neighbourhood, to refuse to follow Allah's Messenger, nor to prefer their own lives to his: because nothing could they suffer or do, but was reckoned to their credit as a deed of righteousness,- whether they suffered thirst, or fatigue, or hunger, in the cause of Allah, or trod paths to raise the ire of the Unbelievers, or received any injury whatever from an enemy: for Allah suffereth not the reward to be lost of those who do good;121. Nor could they spend anything (for the cause) - small or great- nor cut across a valley, but the deed is inscribed to their credit: that Allah may requite their deed with the best (possible reward). 122. Nor should the Believers all go forth together: if a contingent from every expedition remained behind, they could devote themselves to studies in religion, and admonish the people when they return to them,- that thus they (may learn) to guard themselves (against evil). (Surah At-Tawbah 9:120-122/ Yusuf Ali Translation) In the context of the verse, we come to learn that Almighty Allah(swt) begins revealing the condition of the Muslims who were accompanying the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) in Medina. He(swt) then describes that they do not prefer their lives to the Messenger(saaw) because they acknowledge the reward of Almighty Allah(swt) in any loss that they suffer will only count as good deeds on their account, whether they suffer thirst, fatigue, hunger, received an injury (from the enemy), along with any money they spend in the cause of Almighty Allah(swt) they will receive a reward for it.

Almighty Allah(swt) then reveals that the believers shouldnot all go forth together. This is because if a person on every expedition remained behind, they could devot themselves to studying Islam, and admonish the people concerning its teachings and can guard themselves against evil. He(swt) then commands the following; 123. O ye who believe! fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that Allah is with those who fear Him. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:123/ Yusuf Ali Translation) ! Ya ayyuha allatheena amanoo qatiloo, The Arabic word 'qatiloo'( )in this context means 'Fight', and this is the agreed upon opinion of 2 Jalal's, Ibn Abbas (radiallahu anhu) and renowned Muslim commentator Ibn Kathir. (see below) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn O you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, that is, the nearest, followed by the next nearest of them, and let them find harshness in you, that is, severity, in other words, be harsh with them, and know that God is with the pious, helping and granting [them] victory. (source) * Tanwr al-Miqbs min Tafsr Ibn Abbs (O ye who believe!) in Muhammad (pbuh) and in the Qur'an (Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you) the Banu Qurayzah, Banu'l-Nadir, Fadak and Khaybar, (and let them find harshness in you) toughness from you, (and know) O believers (that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him)) Allah helps the believers: Muhammad (pbuh) and his Companions, by making them victorious over their enemies. (source) Tafsir Ibn Kathir ... "O you who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you; and know that Allah is with those who have Taqwa." Allah commands the believers to fight the disbelievers, the closest in area to the Islamic state, then the farthest. This is why the Messenger of Allah started fighting the idolators in the Arabian

Peninsula. When he finished with them and Allah gave him control over Makkah, AlMadinah, At-Ta'if, Yemen, Yamamah, Hajr, Khyber, Hadramawt and other Arab provinces, and the various Arab tribes entered Islam in large crowds, he then started fighting the People of the Scriptures. (source) http://www.quran4u.com/Tafsir%20Ibn %20Kathir/009%20Taubah.htm Ironically!, the above narrations (of the Noble Qur'an) and quotes from renowned commentators of Islam, unanimously reject and debunk the claims of Ali Sina. He has had an epic fail, and has officially been debunked in his lie, asserting that the Qur'an commands the murder of the non Muslims. [Note: Murder is an unjust killing] (continue reading)

fight them, (Q.8:65), until no other religion than Islam is left (Q.2:193)
*We already addressed Surah Al-Anfal 8:65 and explained that the reason Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was commanded to 'rouse' the believers to fight against the disbelievers, was because they were hesitant and hated to fight because they were fearful of potentially loosing their (lives and property) refer to Surah Al-Baqarah 2:216. We also debunked the supposed issues with (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:191), please scroll up. When you read it in its context (verse 190-193) it will become clear to the readers, that this was intended for the disbelievers because they were oppressing and persecuting the Muslims and drove them out of Mecca (and their property).

humiliate them and impose on them a penalty tax if they are Christians or Jews, (Q.9:29)
* Let us analyze the above mentioned passage. 29. Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:29/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

The Muslims have been commanded to fight against those who don't believe in Almighty Allah(swt), nor do they believe in the last day (Day of Judgment), nor hold that which is forbidden which hath been forbidden (i.e. alcohol, pork, pre-marital intercourse, murder, stealing, interest etc), nor acknowledge the religion of truth (Islam), even if they be Jews and Christians, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued. The above instruction is complete in its understanding. This is the same view held by the 2 Jalal's (see below) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn Fight those who do not believe in God, nor in the Last Day, for, otherwise, they would have believed in the Prophet (s), and who do not forbid what God and His Messenger have forbidden, such as wine, nor do they practise the religion of truth, the firm one, the one that abrogated other religions, namely, the religion of Islam from among of those who (min, from, explains [the previous] alladhna, those who) have been given the Scripture, namely, the Jews and the Christians, until they pay the jizya tribute, the annual tax imposed them, readily (an yadin is a circumstantial qualifier, meaning, compliantly, or by their own hands, not delegating it [to others to pay]), being subdued, [being made] submissive and compliant to the authority of Islam. (source) Futhermore, the explanation held by Ibn Kathir is more illuminous as to the Divine instruction from Almighty Allah(swt) [see below] Tafsir Ibn Kathir Allah says; ... "O you who believe! Verily, the Mushrikin are impure. So let them not come near AlMasjid Al-Haram after this year..." "Allah commands His believing servants, who are pure in religion and person, to expel the idolators who are filthy in the religious sense, from Al-Masjid Al-Haram." After the revelation of this Ayah, idolators were no longer allowed to go near the Masjid. This Ayah was revealed in the ninth year of Hijrah. The Messenger of Allah sent Ali in the company of Abu Bakr that year to publicize to the idolators that no Mushrik will be allowed to perform Hajj after that year, nor a naked person allowed to perform Tawaf around the House. Allah completed this decree, made it a legislative ruling, as well as, a fact of reality.

Abdur-Razzaq recorded that Jabir bin Abdullah commented on the Ayah, (O you who believe! Verily, the Mushrikin are impure. So let them not come near AlMasjid Al-Haram after this year), "Unless it was a servant or one of the people of Dhimmah.'' Imam Abu Amr Al-Awza'i said, "Umar bin Abdul-Aziz wrote (to his governors) to prevent Jews and Christians from entering the Masjids of Muslims, and he followed his order with Allah's statement, ( Verily, the Mushrikin are impure). Ata said, "All of the Sacred Area (the Haram) is considered a Masjid, for Allah said, ( So let them not come near Al-Masjid Al-Haram (at Makkah) after this year).'' This Ayah indicates that idolators are impure and that the believers are pure. In the Sahih is the following, The believer does not become impure. Allah said, ... ... and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you, out of His bounty. Muhammad bin Ishaq commented, "The people said, `Our markets will be closed, our commerce disrupted, and what we earned will vanish.' So Allah revealed this verse, ( and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you, out of His bounty), from other resources, ( if He wills), until, ...( and feel themselves subdued). This Ayah means, `this will be your compensation for the closed markets that you feared would result.' Therefore, Allah compensated them for the losses they incurred because they severed ties with idolators, by the Jizyah they earned from the People of the Book.'' Similar statements were reported from Ibn Abbas, Mujahid, Ikrimah, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Qatadah and Ad-Dahhak and others. Allah said, ... ... Surely, Allah is All-Knowing, (in what benefits you),

... All-Wise, in His orders and prohibitions, for He is All-Perfect in His actions and statements, AllJust in His creations and decisions, Blessed and Hallowed be He. This is why Allah compensated Muslims for their losses by the amount of Jizyah that they took from the people of Dhimmah. (source) http://www.quran4u.com/Tafsir%20Ibn%20Kathir/009%20Taubah.htm The commentary of the 2 Jalal's along with Ibn Kathir, teaches us that it was because the Muslims were driven from their homes and because they cut business ties with the idolators of Mecca, they lost their business and were left without income. Almighty Allah(swt) previously assured them, that He will provide for them from His Bounty from 'other resources', and He is All-Knowing and Wise. During the 9th year of the Hijrah and Ali was sent to publicize that the idolators would not be able to perform Hajj and circumbulate the Kabbah naked. The Jizya (taxing) of non-Muslims (including Jews and Christians) was because they rejected the religion of truth, the Muslims were driven from their homes and cut business ties with the idolatorous pagans. This tax was to be imposed upon the disbelievers until they willing payed the tax after feeling themselves subdued, without having an overseer to demand it from them. Its important to note, that this even in Surah At-Tawbah (9:29) was circumstancial during that time, and this ayah (29) does not authorize Muslims subdue Jews and Christians for money, its a circumstancial qualifier, and was revealed during the 9th year of the Hijrah during the conquest of Mecca. From the above, we learn that Muslims were commanded the following; (1) Fight against those who do not believe in Almighty Allah(swt) and the Last Day (2) Fight against those who do not FORBID what Almighty Allah(swt) and His Messenger forbid. (3) Fight against them until they pay the Jizya and feel themselves subdued. The non-Muslims were living under Islamic rule after the conquest of Mecca, and had to abide by the following. The Muslims (under Islamic Shari'ah) are the maintainers and enforcers of Islamic legislation, and if the non-Muslims are not forbidding what Almighty Allah(swt) has made haram (i.e. alcohol, pork, stealing, murder etc) then they are to be fought against [NOTE: Police Officers abide by and enforce the Legislation of the Government and will arrest and imprison anyone who breaks the Laws instituted by that Government. For example in the West, (stealing, murder, rape etc) are forbidden acts. ] In in that sense, the Police Officers are 'Fighting against' the criminals. (continue reading)

slay them if they are Pagans (Q.9:5), crucify, or cut off their hands and feet,
Ali Sina! Really? REALLY??? This man will not end his reign of deceptive terror. Over and over again, we have exposed the blatant butchery of Ali Sina to Quranic passages. Lets review the verse in its context. (see below) -Surah At-Tawbah consist of a Peace Treaty which was to be established between the Muslims and the Mushriks, along with the treaties which were dissolved with some believers and mushriks after they reached the 4 month term. 1. A (declaration) of immunity from Allah and His Messenger, to those of the Pagans with whom ye have contracted mutual alliances:2. Go ye, then, for four months, backwards and forwards, (as ye will), throughout the land, but know ye that ye cannot frustrate Allah (by your falsehood) but that Allah will cover with shame those who reject Him. Tafsir Ibn Kathir (writes) Allah said, ... Freedom from obligations from Allah and His Messenger, is a declaration of freedom from all obligations from Allah and His Messenger, ... those of the Mushrikin, with whom you made a treaty. So travel freely (Mushrikin) for four months (as you will) throughout the land, This Ayah refers to idolators who had indefinite treaties and those, whose treaties with Muslims ended in less than four months. The terms of these treaties were restricted to four months only. As for those whose term of peace ended at a specific date later (than the four months), then their treaties would end when their terms ended, no matter how long afterwards, for Allah said, ( So fulfill their treaty for them until the end of their term). (9:4) So whoever had a covenant with Allah's Messenger then it would last until its period expired, this was reported from Muhammad bin Ka`b Al-Qurazi and others. We will also mention a Hadith on this matter. Abu Ma`shar Al-Madani said that Muhammad bin Ka`b Al-Qurazi and several others said,

"The Messenger of Allah sent Abu Bakr to lead the Hajj rituals on the ninth year (of Hijrah). He also sent Ali bin Abi Talib with thirty or forty Ayat from Bara'ah (At-Tawbah), and he recited them to the people, giving the idolators four months during which they freely move about in the land. He recited these Ayat on the day of Arafah (ninth of Dhul-Hijjah). The idolators were given twenty more days (till the end) of Dhul-Hijjah, Muharram, Safar, Rabi Al-Awwal and ten days from Rabi Ath-Thani. He proclaimed to them in their camping areas, `No Mushrik will be allowed to perform Hajj after this year, nor a naked person to perform Tawaf around the House.''' So Allah said, ... but know that you cannot escape (from the punishment of) Allah; and Allah will disgrace the disbelievers. (source) -After Almighty Allah(swt) granted the Mushirks (pagan, idolators) the 4 month grace period, He declared that war be declared on the pagans. (see below) 5. But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, an seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practise regular charity, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:5/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Tafsir Ibn Kathir (writes) Allah said next, ... So when the Sacred Months have passed..., meaning, `Upon the end of the four months during which We prohibited you from fighting the idolators, and which is the grace period We gave them, then fight and kill the idolators wherever you may find them.' Mujahid, Amr bin Shu`ayb, Muhammad bin Ishaq, Qatadah, As-Suddi and AbdurRahman bin Zayd bin Aslam said that; the four months mentioned in this Ayah are the four-month grace period mentioned in the earlier Ayah, ( So travel freely for four months throughout the land).

Allah's statement next, ... ... then fight the Mushrikin wherever you find them, means, on the earth in general, except for the Sacred Area, for Allah said, And fight not with them at Al-Masjid Al-Haram, unless they fight you there. But if they attack you, then fight them. (2:191) Allah said here, ... ... and capture them, executing some and keeping some as prisoners, ... ... and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush, do not wait until you find them. Rather, seek and besiege them in their areas and forts, gather intelligence about them in the various roads and fairways so that what is made wide looks ever smaller to them. This way, they will have no choice, but to die or embrace Islam, ... But if they repent and perform the Salah, and give the Zakah, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. Abu Bakr As-Siddiq used this and other honorable Ayat as proof for fighting those who refrained from paying the Zakah. These Ayat allowed fighting people unless, and until, they embrace Islam and implement its rulings and obligations. Allah mentioned the most important aspects of Islam here, including what is less important. Surely, the highest elements of Islam after the Two Testimonials are the prayer, which is the right of Allah, the Exalted and Ever High, then the Zakah, which benefits the poor and needy. These are the most honorable acts that creatures perform, and this is why Allah often mentions the prayer and Zakah together. In the Two Sahihs, it is recorded that Ibn Umar said that the Messenger of Allah said, I have been commanded to fight the people until they testify that there is no deity worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, establish the prayer and pay the Zakah. This honorable Ayah (9:5) was called the Ayah of the Sword, about which AdDahhak bin Muzahim said, "It abrogated every agreement of peace between the Prophet and any idolator, every treaty, and every term.''

Al-Awfi said that Ibn Abbas commented: "No idolator had any more treaty or promise of safety ever since Surah Bara'ah was revealed. The four months, in addition to, all peace treaties conducted before Bara'ah was revealed and announced had ended by the tenth of the month of Rabi Al-Akhir.'' (source) -In the above commentary and Sahih Hadith narrations, we learn that the treaty of peace between the Mushrik and the Muslims were no more, and they were to accept Islam or perish from death in their disbelief. However, as to those of the pagans who asked for Asylum, they were to be granted that and brought to a place of security so they can hear the words of Almighty Allah(swt) because they were a people who were without knowledge. 6. If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum, grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah. and then escort him to where he can be secure. That is because they are men without knowledge. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:6/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Now for those not familiar with the content of this treaty, they may think this was a brutal way of dealing with the issue. But as you will find below, this was nothing short of justified. (see below) 7. How can there be a league, before Allah and His Messenger, with the Pagans, except those with whom ye made a treaty near the sacred Mosque? As long as these stand true to you, stand ye true to them: for Allah doth love the righteous. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:7/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Tafsir Ibn Kathir (writes) Allah mentions the wisdom in dissolving all obligations to the idolators and giving them a four month period of safety, after which they will meet the sharp sword wherever they are found, can there be a covenant for the Mushrikin, a safe resort and refuge, while they persist in Shirk with Allah, and disbelief in Him and His Messenger, ... ... with Allah and with His Messenger ... ... except those with whom you made a covenant near Al-Masjid Al-Haram, on the day of Hudaybiyyah. Allah said in another Ayah (concerning the day of Hudaybiyyah), They are the ones who disbelieved and hindered you from Al-Masjid Al-Haram and detained the sacrificial animals, from reaching their place of sacrifice. (48:25)

Allah said next, ... ... So long as they are true to you, stand you true to them, if they keep the terms of the treaties you conducted with them, including peace between you and them for ten years, ... then stand you true to them. Verily, Allah loves those who have Taqwa. (source) The Messenger of Allah and the Muslims preserved the terms of the treaty with the people of Makkah from the month of Dhul-Qa`dah in the sixth year (of Hijrah), until the Quraysh broke it and helped their allies, Banu Bakr, against Khuza`ah, the allies of Allah's Messenger. Aided by the Quraysh, Banu Bakr killed some of Bani Khuza`ah in the Sacred Area! The Messenger of Allah led an invasion army in the month of Ramadan, of the eighth year, and Allah opened the Sacred Area for him to rule over them, all thanks are due to Allah. The Messenger of Allah freed the Quraysh who embraced Islam after they were overpowered and defeated. These numbered around two thousands, and they were referred to by the name `Tulaqa' afterwards. Those among them who remained in disbelief and ran away from Allah's Messenger were sent promises of safe refuge for four months, during which they were allowed to move about freely. They included Safwan bin Umayyah, Ikrimah bin Abi Jahl and many others. Allah later on guided them to Islam, and they became excellent believers. Surely, Allah is worthy of all praise for all His actions and decrees. *Notice!, it was the Mushriks who broke the covenant with the Muslims by attacking their allies from the month of Dhul-Qa'dah in the sixth year of the Hijrah, breaking their 10 year treaty of peace. Ibn Kathir states; "The Messenger of Allah and the Muslims preserved the terms of the treaty with the people of Makkah from the month of Dhul-Qa`dah in the sixth year (of Hijrah), until the Quraysh broke it and helped their allies, Banu Bakr, against Khuza`ah, the allies of Allah's Messenger. Aided by the Quraysh, Banu Bakr killed some of Bani Khuza`ah in the Sacred Area! The Messenger of Allah led an invasion army in the month of Ramadan, of the eighth year, and Allah opened the Sacred Area for him to rule over them, all thanks are due to Allah." After this blatant treachery of the Quraysh, Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) freed the captives among the Muslims (of the Quraysh tribe) when Islam became dominant and they were overpowered, and embraced Islam. Ibn Kathir states; The Messenger of Allah freed the Quraysh who embraced Islam after they were overpowered and defeated. These numbered around two thousands, and they were referred to by the name `Tulaqa' afterwards. After the context is applied this is what we learned thus far...

(1) The Muslims had a peace treaty with the pagan Quraysh, a treatyb to last 10 years. (No war can be declared, no one attacked) (2) During the 6th year of the treaty, the Quraysh attacked the allies of the Muslims (Bani Khuza'ah) and killed some of the people among them. (3) Even after this dishonest attack took place, Almighty Allah(swt) gave them a 4 month grace period of peace, with no retaliation from the Muslims. (4) After the 4 months were over, the Muslims were commanded to find those pagans and slay them wherever they find them, and look for them and lie in wait in every strategem of war (S.9:5). EXCEPT for those who seek peace, or who there is an established treaty which hasn't been violated, (by the attack on Bani Khuza'ah). Finally, it should be understood that this passage of the Qur'an, Surah 9:5 is not a declarative statement, for the Muslims to declare war on those who are pagan (throughout the world) rather it was a circumstancial qualifier for what took place. Ali Sina is a slithering basilisk and continues to display his royal status in his 'Air Castle' He claimed that (9:5) stated to "crucify them and cut off their hands or feet". Where did Surah 9:5 declare to crucify or cutt off their hands and feet? Why does Ali Sina not cease in his lies? Is this what having FAITH FREEDOM is all about?

expel them from the land in disgrace. And as if this were not enough, they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter (Q.5:34),
ATTENTION ALI SINA! We at WIO wish that you would quote things in their context and stop butchering our scripture. With each refutation of your goof idiot claims, we are becoming concerned with your mental health and are willing to give you aid if you need it. (no pun intended, we can seriously help you) Its, now time to take a look at the passage in its context. 33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; 34. Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. (Surah Al-Maidah 5:33-34/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn

The following was revealed when the Arniyyn came to Medina suffering from some illness, and the Prophet (s) gave them permission to go and drink from the camels urine and milk. Once they felt well they slew the Prophets shepherd and stole the herd of camels: Truly the only requital of those who fight against God and His Messenger, by fighting against Muslims, and hasten about the earth to do corruption there, by waylaying, is that they shall be slaughtered, or crucified, or have their hands and feet cut off on opposite sides, that is, their right hands and left feet, or be banished from the land (the aw, or, is [used] to indicate the [separate] application of [each of] the cases [listed]; thus, death is for those that have only killed; crucifixion is for those that have killed and stolen property; the cutting off [of limbs on opposite sides] is for those that have stolen property but have not killed; while banishment is for those that pose a threat this was stated by Ibn Abbs and is the opinion of al-Shfi; the more sound of his [al-Shfis] two opinions is that crucifixion should be for three days after [the] death [of the killer], or, it is also said, shortly before [he is killed]; with banishment are included similar punishments, such as imprisonment and the like). That, mentioned requital, is a degradation, a humiliation, for them in this world; and in the Hereafter theirs will be a great chastisement, namely, the chastisement of the Fire. (source) The critics of Islam love to pull passages from the Noble Qur'an out of context to seek and cause disruption about its statements and pull people away from the truth. This verse was not revealed for those who simply fight against Almighty Allah(swt) and His Messenger(saaw), because if that was the case, then all of the Quraysh at the Battle of Badr, the Battle of Uhd and during the conquest of Mecca would've received the same punishment. This particular punishment didn't even take pace during the Khalifa's after the death of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam), if indeed this was the traditional method against all who fought against Almighty Allah(swt) and his Messenger, this would've happened with the Jews and Christians of Mecca and Medina, and would've been sanctioned by the rightly guided Sahabah. However, to the contrary, there is no method of punishment mentioned (in any authentic Islamic source) happening to anyone besides these treacherous criminals who gave false oaths to satisfy their evil motives. (see below) Blood Money (Ad-Diyat) Bukhari :: Book 9 :: Volume 83 :: Hadith 37 Narrated Abu Qilaba: Once 'Umar bin 'Abdul 'Aziz sat on his throne in the courtyard of his house so that the people might gather before him. Then he admitted them and (when they came in), he said, "What do you think of Al-Qasama?" They said, "We say that it is lawful to depend on Al-Qasama in Qisas, as the previous Muslim Caliphs carried out Qisas depending on

it." Then he said to me, "O Abu Qilaba! What do you say about it?" He let me appear before the people and I said, "O Chief of the Believers! You have the chiefs of the army staff and the nobles of the Arabs. If fifty of them testified that a married man had committed illegal sexual intercourse in Damascus but they had not seen him (doing so), would you stone him?" He said, "No." I said, "If fifty of them testified that a man had committed theft in Hums, would you cut off his hand though they did not see him?" He replied, "No." I said, "By Allah, Allah's Apostle never killed anyone except in one of the following three situations: (1) A person who killed somebody unjustly, was killed (in Qisas,) (2) a married person who committed illegal sexual intercourse and (3) a man who fought against Allah and His Apostle and deserted Islam and became an apostate." Then the people said, "Didn't Anas bin Malik narrate that Allah's Apostle cut off the hands of the thieves, branded their eyes and then, threw them in the sun?" I said, "I shall tell you the narration of Anas. Anas said: "Eight persons from the tribe of 'Ukl came to Allah's Apostle and gave the Pledge of allegiance for Islam (became Muslim). The climate of the place (Medina) did not suit them, so they became sick and complained about that to Allah's Apostle. He said (to them ), "Won't you go out with the shepherd of our camels and drink of the camels' milk and urine (as medicine)?" They said, "Yes." So they went out and drank the camels' milk and urine, and after they became healthy, they killed the shepherd of Allah's Apostle and took away all the camels. This news reached Allah's Apostle , so he sent (men) to follow their traces and they were captured and brought (to the Prophet). He then ordered to cut their hands and feet, and their eyes were branded with heated pieces of iron, and then he threw them in the sun till they died." I said, "What can be worse than what those people did? They deserted Islam, committed murder and theft." Here are the points that were learned from the aformentioned Sahih Hadith narration. [NOTE: Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) never killed anyone, except if they killed someone unjustly (Murder), a married person committing illegal sexual intercourse, and one who fought against Almighty Allah(swt) and His Messenger (i..e on the battlefield) [and this case] (1) Eight Men from the tribe of Ukl swore an oath (false) of allegiance to Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). (2) The weather conditions (climate) of the place they were at in Medina did not suit them, and they became sick from the heat. (3) They complained to Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) about their sickness. (4) He requested that they go out with his shepard, and drink the camels urine and Milk to become healed. (5) They drank the camels urine and milk and were healed from their sickness. Then they killed Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhin wasalaam's) shepard, and took away all of his camels. (6) The news reached Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) and he then ordered that their hands and feet be cut off, their eyes be branded with hot iron, and they were left in the desert until they died.

Abu Qilaba said his final statement perfectly; "What can be worse than what those people did? They deserted Islam, committed murder and theft. NOTE: The punishment for stealing in Islam is that the hand be cut off, if it happens again, the opposite foot be cut off. NOTE: Murder itself, is punishable by death, but they also stole so the hadd punishment of stealing was placed on them. NOTE: They killed the shepard of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) thereby negating their oaths, because at the time of stealing, committing illegal sexual intercourse or consuming alcohol, one is not a believer. The punsihment was justified. (please continue reading)

not befriend their own fathers or brothers if they are not believers (Q.9:23), (Q.3:28),
FIRST PASSAGE 23. O ye who believe! take not for protectors your fathers and your brothers if they love infidelity above Faith: if any of you do so, they do wrong. (Surah At-Tawbah 9:23/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn The following was revealed regarding those who refrained from emigrating because of their families and trade: O you who believe, do not take your fathers and brothers for your friends, if they prefer, if they have chosen, disbelief over belief; whoever of you takes them for friends, such are the evildoers. (source) *What makes this response of WIO's even more disturbing, is that we addressed this same claim earlier in our evaluation of Ali Sina's 'Fairy Tale Apostasy' story. This passage was revealed because the Muslims were hesitant against emigrating with the believers, because they didn't wan't to loose their families and the wealth that was received through trade. Almighty Allah(swt) is instructing the believers not to choose their father's or brother's as friends, if they have preferred and chosen disbelief over belief. and whosoever does this will be a wrongdoer.

Ali Sina foolishly implies that the Noble Qur'an or Almighty Allah(swt) is being harsh or unkind to the families of the believers. When in fact the instruction provides unity in faith and good action over disbelief and wrongful deeds. This message is affirmed even further, when Almighty Allah(swt) tells us not to take our father's or brother's as protectors and friends if they choose disbelief over belief, but submit to Allah(swt) and avoid being of the wrong doers.

SECOND PASSAGE 28. Let not the believers Take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah. except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah. (Surah Al-Imran 3:28/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn Let not the believers take the disbelievers as patrons, rather than, that is, instead of, the believers for whoever does that, that is, [whoever] takes them as patrons, does not belong to, the religion of, God in anyway unless you protect yourselves against them, as a safeguard (tuqtan, as a safeguard, is the verbal noun from taqiyyatan), that is to say, [unless] you fear something, in which case you may show patronage to them through words, but not in your hearts: this was before the hegemony of Islam and [the dispensation] applies to any individual residing in a land with no say in it. God warns you, He instills fear in you, of His Self, [warning] that He may be wrathful with you if you take them as patrons; and to God is the journeys end, the return, and He will requite you. (source) Again! The commands and instruction is clear. Muslims are not to take the disbelieving pagan idolators as friends or patrons in place of the believers. The believers are unified in their faith toward Almighty Allah(swt) and their hearts are joined in brotherhood in Islam, therefore, it is not befitting that a true believer choose (faith, guidance, mercy and love) of Almighty Allah(swt) and His Messenger(saaw) in place of (disbelief, misguidance, anger and hate) of the pagan idolators. (please continue reading below)

kill their own family in the battles of Badr and Uhud

and asks Muslims to strive against the unbelievers with great endeavor (Q.25:52),
52. Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness, with the (Qur'an). (Surah Al-Furqan 25:52/ Yusuf Ali Translation) *Okay! We understand that Ali Sina takes passages out of context, and we understand that he misinterprets certain passages of the Noble Qur'an, but how is it that he can read a verse so explicitly clear concerning its meaning, then he completely accusses it of being something abstract from what it actually says? The Above passage doesn't even need an explanation beyond its meaning. The verse says nothing about killing your own family in the Battle of Badr and Uhud ( terribly incompetent ). We are to strive against the disbelievers with the Qur'an and its Hikmah. Just to silence this daffy Emperor (King of the Air Castle Throne), let us post the Tafsirs of renowned Islamic commentators. * Tafsir al-Jalalayn So do not obey the disbelievers, in their desires, but struggle against them therewith, that is, through [adherence to] the Qurn, with a great endeavour. (source) Tafsir Ibn Kathir Allah says: ... So obey not the disbelievers, but strive hard against them with it. meaning, with the Qur'an. This was the view of Ibn Abbas. ... with the utmost endeavour. This is like the Ayah, O Prophet! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, (9:73) (source)

(continue reading below)

be stern with them because they belong to hell (Q.66:9).

9. O Prophet! Strive hard against the Unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell,- an evil refuge (indeed). (Surah At-Tahrim 66:9/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Tafsir Ibn Kathir Allah command's the Prophet! ... O Prophet!Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites,Allah the Exalted orders His Messenger to perform Jihad against the disbelievers and hypocrites, the former with weapons and armaments and the later by establishing Allah's legislated penal code, ... ... and be severe against them, meaning, in this life, ... their abode will be Hell, and worst indeed is that destination. that is, in the Hereafter. *Almighty Allah(swt) has commanded the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) to strive against theunbelievers and hypocrites. Strive against the disbelievers with swords and defensive apparrel (as on the battle-field) and against the Hypocrites with a firm voice. Where does the problem lie? (please continue reading)

How can any sensible person remain unmoved when he or she finds the Quran saying: strike off the heads of the unbelievers then after a wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives (Q.47:4).

 4. Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been Allah's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost. (Surah Muhammad 47:4/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn So when you encounter [in battle] those who disbelieve, then [attack them with] a striking of the necks (fa-darbal-riqbi is a verbal noun in place of the [full] verbal construction, that is to say, fadrib riqbahum, then strike their necks), in other words, slay them reference is made to the striking of the necks because the predominant cause of being slayed is to be struck in the neck. Then, when you have made thoroughly decimated them, bind, spare them, take them captive and bind firmly, the bonds (alwathq is what is used to bind [ythaqu] a captive). Thereafter either [set them free] by grace (mannan is a verbal noun in place of the [full] verbal construction), that is to say, either show them grace by setting them free unconditionally; or by ransom, ransoming them with payment or with Muslim captives, until the war, that is to say, its participants, lay down its burdens, its heavy loads of weaponry and other things, so that either the disbelievers surrender or enter into a treaty. This [last clause] constitutes the purpose of [enjoining the Muslims to] slaying and taking captive. So [shall it be] (dhlika is the predicate of an implied subject, [such as] al-amr, the ordinance, in other words, the ordinance [of God] regarding them is as mentioned). And had God willed, He could have [Himself] taken vengeance on them, without any fighting, but, He has commanded you to [do] it, that He may test some of you by means of others, from among them, by way of battle, so that the slain among you will end up in Paradise, while those [slain] among them [will end up] in the Fire. And those who are slain (qutil: a variant reading has qtal, those who fight) this verse was revealed on the day of [the battle of] Uhud, after the dead and the wounded had become numerous among the Muslims in the way of God, He will not let their works go to waste, He will [not] render [them] void. (source) * I am not sure how much we have to exhaust the fact that the Pagans and the Muslims were at war with one another. The Pagan Quraysh drove the Muslims from their homes, sold their property, persecuted their families and openly slandered them and accussed Prophet Muhammad(salalahu alayhi wasalaam) of being a mad man, then attempted to kill him (a few times). When war was declared on the Pagans of Mecca, whether it was the Battle of Badr or Uhud or the time of conquest, the striking of the necks was a prominent place to strike the enemy for a more effective kill of the enemy In fact, if a soldier is fighting in combat against the enemy on the battlefield and he is

using a firearm or melee weapon, they will also target major arteries and blood vessels, or go for instant kills such as severing the jugular vein, or shooting the person directly in the frontal lobe for an instant kill. Where is the objection to those people who are fighting for their life and seeking an instant way to terminate the one who is trying to kill them? Will Ali Sina be consistent in his argumentation and condemn logical fighting methods to take out an enemy? -Another aspect which Ali Sina conveniently overlooks, is the statement of Almighty Allah(swt), that if the Muslims through their mercy seek to let the captives go free or for a ransom. Had it been Almighty Allah(swt)'s will and He intended no Mercy toward the disbelievers, He could've ordered that they be completely destroyed without the option of survival. Ultimately, they are the enemies of the Muslims and that has been the case since the beginning, therefore, the Muslims are intitled to the option of terminating them or keeping them alive. (please continue reading below)

I was also shocked to learn the Quran denies freedom of belief for all and clearly states Islam is the only acceptable religion (Q.3:85).
At this point in time, we are declaring that Ali Sina is intellectually, truthfully and scriptually bankrupt and has to use lies and deceit just to attain a certain goal with like minded individuals as himself. 85. If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah., never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good). (Surah Al-Imran 3:85/ Yusuf Ali Translation) The Noble Qur'an does not teach that people cannot 'choose' to have a partcular faith or no belief at all. This passage affirms the authenticity of Islam and they way of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) and emphatically declares that NO OTHER way of life is acceptable in the sight of Almighty Allah(swt). And while the choice is open for any human being (or Jinn) to believe or disbelive, there is a consequence for rejecting Islam, and they will be of the people in the Hell-Fire in the Akhira (afterlife). * Tafsir al-Jalalayn The following was revealed regarding those who apostatized and became disbelievers: Whoever desires a religion other than Islam, it shall not be accepted from him and in the Hereafter he shall be among the losers, because he will end up in the Fire, made

everlasting for him. (source) Furthermore, the Noble Qur'an teaches that there is no compulsion in the religion of Islam and whoever will hear the message then let them hear, and whoever will reject the message so be it. 256. Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error: whoever rejects evil and believes in Allah hath grasped the most trustworthy hand-hold, that never breaks. And Allah heareth and knoweth all things. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:256/ Yusuf Ali Translation) -Ali Sina, STOP with your misrepresentation of the Noble Qur'an. Your pathetic attempts are disgusting and un scholarly. (please continue reading)

He says unbelievers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (Q.14:17).
The punishment of disobeying Almighty Allah(swt) and denying His messengers and being rebellious in the Earth, is the Hell-Fire to abide therein forever. While in the HellFire, the inmates will face many punishments ranging from consumption of pus and or boiling water. With that being said; lets review the immediate context of the passage to further solidify its claims. (see below) 10. Their apostles said: "Is there a doubt about Allah, The Creator of the heavens and the earth? It is He Who invites you, in order that He may forgive you your sins and give you respite for a term appointed!" They said: "Ah! ye are no more than human, like ourselves! Ye wish to turn us away from the (gods) our fathers used to worship: then bring us some clear authority." 11. Their apostles said to them: "True, we are human like yourselves, but Allah doth grant His grace to such of his servants as He pleases. It is not for us to bring you an authority except as Allah permits. And on Allah let all men of faith put their trust. 12. "No reason have we why we should not put our trust on Allah. Indeed He Has guided us to the Ways we (follow). We shall certainly bear with patience all the hurt you may cause us. For those who put their trust should put their trust on Allah." 13. And the Unbelievers said to their apostles: "Be sure we shall drive you out of our land, or ye shall return to our religion." But their Lord inspired (this Message) to them:

"Verily We shall cause the wrong-doers to perish! 14. "And verily We shall cause you to abide in the land, and succeed them. This for such as fear the Time when they shall stand before My tribunal,- such as fear the punishment denounced." 15. But they sought victory and decision (there and then), and frustration was the lot of every powerful obstinate transgressor. 16. In front of such a one is Hell, and he is given, for drink, boiling fetid water. 17. In gulps will he sip it, but death will come to him from every quarter, yet will he not die: and in front of him will be a chastisement unrelenting. never will he be near swallowing it down his throat: 18. The parable of those who reject their Lord is that their works are as ashes, on which the wind blows furiously on a tempestuous day: No power have they over aught that they have earned: that is the straying far, far (from the goal). -From the immediate context of the above passages, we learn that Messengers were sent to the people, who advised them to come to the Mercy and Respite and Forgiveness of Almighty Allah(swt) because thats all He intended for them. They openly rejected and rebuked the messengers and sought to drive them from the land. In Islamic theology, they are labeled as rebellious sinners and disbelievers and Hell-Fire is their requital for the evil that their hands have put forth. (please continue reading)

Further, As for the unbelievers, for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowls and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods (Q.22:9).
Again! The punishments put forward by Almighty Allah(swt) for the rebellious sinners and disbelievers ranges according to their level of disbelief and the amount of their sin which they committed. There are different punishments in the Hell-Fire according to the articular sin put forward, but Ali Sina is so farsighted concerning Islamic teachings, we will continue to educated this miss guided individual. Immediate Context below; 5. O mankind! if ye have a doubt about the Resurrection, (consider) that We created you out of dust, then out of sperm, then out of a leech-like clot, then out of a morsel of flesh, partly formed and partly unformed, in order that We may manifest (our power) to you; and We cause whom We will to rest in the wombs for an appointed term, then do We bring you out as babes, then (foster you) that ye may reach your age of full strength; and

some of you are called to die, and some are sent back to the feeblest old age, so that they know nothing after having known (much), and (further), thou seest the earth barren and lifeless, but when We pour down rain on it, it is stirred (to life), it swells, and it puts forth every kind of beautiful growth (in pairs). 6. This is so, because Allah is the Reality: it is He Who gives life to the dead, and it is He Who has power over all things. 7. And verily the Hour will come: there can be no doubt about it, or about (the fact) that Allah will raise up all who are in the graves. 8. Yet there is among men such a one as disputes about Allah, without Knowledge, without Guidance, and without a Book of Enlightenment,9. (Disdainfully) bending his side, in order to lead (men) astray from the Path of Allah. for him there is disgrace in this life, and on the Day of Judgment We shall make him taste the Penalty of burning (Fire). 10. (It will be said): "This is because of the deeds which thy hands sent forth, for verily Allah is not unjust to His servants. Almighty Allah(swt) speaks of the intial creation of man, and man in the womb of his mother, and says that this is the evident proof of the Day of Resurrection. We were once nothing, then we were a sperm drop, (mixed with the egg) then the fertilization process then we are conscious beings FROM NOTHING. Then there are those who bend (use their might) to strive against Almighty Allah(swt) and pull people away from the path, and who dispute with Him(swt) with knowledge and argue against His Guidance. And because of that, they are punished accordingly. Ali Sina is exceedingly blasphemous against Almighty Allah(swt) and pretends that He has authority. Hey Ali Sina! Stop seeking to scare people with the Hell-Fire, you have no good to offer to those who believe and are not the one who distributes the punishment or reward to the created beings. (please continue reading)

How sadistic! The book of Allah says women are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to beat them (Q.4:34), and that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (Q.66:10).
How Many Women Are Domestically Abused Anually? -A thing to be noted is, the amount of spousal abuse which takes place in the West is outstandingly high. According to the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (NCADV) an estimated 1.3 million women are the victims of physical violence and

domestic abuse. An estimated 1 out of every 4 women will experience physical violence from an intimate partner at least once in their life time. (source) http://www.ncadv.org/files/DomesticViolenceFactSheet(National).pdf What Is the Reason Behind The Domestic Abuse? By TOBY D. GOLDSMITH, MD (source) http://psychcentral.com/lib/2006/what-causes-domestic-violence/ "Domestic violence may start when one partner feels the need to control and dominate the other." [NOTE: Islam doesn't sanction that the Husband dominates his wife as to control her. Rather, the domination is instituted for the household and its security. The domination of the Husband is not on his free will, but that he is the head of home and provides for the wife from his means (i.e. clothes, food, shelter) and that he protects her (i.e. from what is haraam and from danger or harm.) This is learned from the beginning of the passage of Surah Nisaa 4:34 (see below) 34. "Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means...." (Surah An-Nisa 4:34/ Yusuf Ali Translation) "Abusers may feel this need to control their partner because of low self-esteem, extreme jealousy, difficulties in regulating anger and other strong emotions, or when they feel inferior to the other partner in education and socioeconomic background. Some men with very traditional beliefs may think they have the right to control women, and that women arent equal to men." [NOTE: As we have shown from the above notation, the Man does rule over his wife and the household for any of the above mentioned issues (as in common cases) rather its because Almighty Allah(swt) has given the man more strength over the woman and because the Man supports his wife through his means. In fact, this type of supporting and maintaining is a means of solidarity and not of repulsion. "This domination then takes the form of emotional, physical or sexual abuse. Studies suggest that violent behavior often is caused by an interaction of situational and individual factors. That means that abusers learn violent behavior from their family, people in their community and other cultural influences as they grow up. They may have seen violence often or they may have been victims themselves." [NOTE: As mentioned previously, this is not the case with the Muslim man. The act of discipline to ones wife is 1 not to be harsh as to deform or distort, neither is the husband allowed to strike the face of his wife (as we shall see later). If the wife is disobedient to

her provider (i.e. the husband) and is treacherous in the household (even after he advises her, and refuses sexual intercourse) then a light beating is prescribed for her in this case. Such a discipline is not violent or abusive, rather it is conditional and medicinal for the relationship to grow. (After viewing the statisical and psychological reason for domestic abuse, lets continue reading below and see the divine wisdom behind this form of moral discipline.) 34. Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because they support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them Means (of annoyance): For Allah is Most High, great (above you all). (Surah An-Nisa 4:34/ Yusuf Ali Translation) *Let us see what the renowned Islamic commentator Ibn Kathir had to say, regarding this passage. Tafsir Ibn Kathir Allah said, ... Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, meaning, the man is responsible for the woman, and he is her maintainer, caretaker and leader who disciplines her if she deviates. ... ... because Allah has made one of them to excel the other, meaning, because men excel over women and are better than them for certain tasks. This is why Prophethood was exclusive of men, as well as other important positions of leadership. The Prophet said, People who appoint a woman to be their leader, will never achieve success. Al-Bukhari recorded this Hadith. Such is the case with appointing women as judges or on other positions of leadership. ... ... and because they spend from their means. meaning the dowry, expenditures and various expenses that Allah ordained in His Book and the Sunnah of His Messenger

for men to spend on women. For these reasons it is suitable that he is appointed her maintainer, just as Allah said, ( But men have a degree (of responsibility) over them). (2:228)

Qualities of the Righteous Wife

Allah said, ... ... Therefore, the righteous (women), ... ... are Qanitat, obedient to their husbands, as Ibn Abbas and others stated. ... ... and guard in the husband's absence, As-Suddi and others said that; it means she protects her honor and her husband's property when he is absent. and Allah's statement, ... ... what Allah orders them to guard. means, the protected (husband) is the one whom Allah protects. Ibn Jarir recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah said, The best women is she who when you look at her, she pleases you, when you command her she obeys you, and when you are absent, she protects her honor and your property. Then, the Messenger of Allah recited the Ayah, ( Men are the protectors and maintainers of women), until its end. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abdur-Rahman bin 'Awf said that the Messenger of Allah said, : If the woman prayed her five daily prayers, fasted her month, protected her chastity and obeyed her husband, she will be told, 'Enter Paradise from any of its doors you wish.'

Dealing with the Wife's Ill-Conduct

Allah said, ... ... As to those women on whose part you see ill conduct, meaning, the woman from whom you see ill conduct with her husband, such as when she acts as if she is above her husband, disobeys him, ignores him, dislikes him, and so forth. When these signs appear in a woman, her husband should advise her and remind her of Allah's torment if she disobeys him. Indeed, Allah ordered the wife to obey her husband and prohibited her from disobeying him, because of the enormity of his rights and all that he does for her.

The Messenger of Allah said, If I were to command anyone to prostrate before anyone, I would have commanded the wife to prostrate before her husband, because of the enormity of his right upon her. Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Hurayrah said that the Messenger of Allah said, If the man asks his wife to come to his bed and she declines, the angels will keep cursing her until the morning. Muslim recorded it with the wording, If the wife goes to sleep while ignoring her husband's bed, the angels will keep cursing her until the morning. This is why Allah said, ... ... As to those women on whose part you see ill conduct, admonish them (first). Allah's statement, ... ... abandon them in their beds, Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn Abbas said, "The abandonment refers to not having intercourse with her, to lie on her bed with his back to her.'' Several others said similarly. As-Suddi, Ad-Dahhak, Ikrimah, and Ibn Abbas, in another narration, added, "Not to speak with her or talk to her.'' The Sunan and Musnad compilers recorded that Muawiyah bin Haydah Al-Qushayri said, "O Allah's Messenger! What is the right that the wife of one of us has on him'' The Prophet said, when you buy clothes for yourself, refrain from striking her face or cursing her, and to not abandon her, except in the house. Allah's statement, ... ... beat them, means, if advice and ignoring her in the bed do not produce the desired results, you are allowed to discipline the wife, without severe beating.

Muslim recorded that Jabir said that during the Farewell Hajj, the Prophet said; Fear Allah regarding women, for they are your assistants. You have the right on them that they do not allow any person whom you dislike to step on your mat. However, if they do that, you are allowed to discipline them lightly. They have a right on you that you provide them with their provision and clothes, in a reasonable manner. Ibn Abbas and several others said that; the Ayah refers to a beating that is not violent. Al-Hasan Al-Basri said that; it means, a beating that is not severe.

When the Wife Obeys Her Husband, Means of Annoyance Against Her are Prohibited
Allah said, ... ... but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance), meaning, when the wife obeys her husband in all that Allah has allowed, then no means of annoyance from the husband are allowed against his wife. Therefore, in this case, the husband does not have the right to beat her or shun her bed. Allah's statement, ... Surely, Allah is Ever Most High, Most Great. reminds men that if they transgress against their wives without justification, then Allah, the Ever Most High, Most Great, is their Protector, and He will exert revenge on those who transgress against their wives and deal with them unjustly. [The above explanation of Ibn Kathir, from the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu lauyhi wasalaam) and his rightly guided Companions is sufficient (for now), so we will not exhaust this any further)

NEXT:

SURAH 66:10
10. Allah sets forth, for an example to the Unbelievers, the wife of Noah and the wife of

Lut: they were (respectively) under two of our righteous servants, but they were false to their (husbands), and they profited nothing before Allah on their account, but were told: "Enter ye the Fire along with (others) that enter!" (Surah At-Tahrim 66:10/ Yusuf Ali Translation) This passage is self explanitory, the wife of prophet Noah (alayhi salaam) and the wife of prophet Lut (alayhi salaam) were both disobedient and behaved treacherously against not just their husbands, but husbands who were prophets and messengers of Almighty Allah(swt). * Tafsir al-Jalalayn God has struck a similitude for those who disbelieve: the wife of Noah and the wife of Lot. They were under two of Our righteous servants, yet they betrayed them, in [their] religion, for they both disbelieved Noahs wife, called Whila, used to say to his people that he was a madman, while Lots wife, called Wila, used to tell his people the whereabouts of his guests when they stayed with him, at night by lighting a fire, and during the day by making smoke. So they, that is, Noah and Lot, did not avail the two women in any way against God, against His chastisement, and it was said, to the two women: Enter, both of you, the Fire along with the incomers, from among the disbelievers of the peoples of Noah and Lot. (source) *It is clear that these critics (such as Ali Sina) are shameless delusional creatures who have no moral or scriptural integrity whatsoever. Had Ali Sina actually been honest in his study of the Noble Qur'an, we would not need to debunk and refute him, this just goes to show that Ali Sina wasn't writing his papers for scholarly purposes (not saying he is a scholar) rather, he wrote them to appeal to an audience that is just as, if not more ignorant of Islam than he is. (Please continue reading)

It says men have an advantage over women (Q.2:228).

Ali Sina is EXPOSING his entire "Fairy Tale", with his lies and deceptions. How many times do we have to say that he is a LIAR and DECEIVER before he himself acknowledges it? Let us yet again, turn to the passage and see what is says.

228. Divorced women shall wait concerning themselves for three monthly periods. Nor is it lawful for them to hide what Allah Hath created in their wombs, if they have faith in Allah and the Last Day. And their husbands have the better right to take them back in that period, if they wish for reconciliation. And women shall have rights similar to the rights against them, according to what is equitable; but men have a degree (of advantage) over them. And Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:228/ Yusuf Ali Translation) -The basis for the Man having the better right over the women, is on the basis that no one has the right to seek marriage with these women during their waiting period. * Tafsir al-Jalalayn Divorced women shall wait by themselves, before remarrying, for three periods (qurin is the plural of qar), of purity or menstruation these are two different opinions which begin from the moment of divorce. This [stipulation] applies to those who have been sexually penetrated but not to those otherwise, on account of His saying, there shall be no [waiting] period for you to reckon against them [Q. 33:49]. The waiting period for immature or menopausal women is three months; pregnant women, on the other hand, must wait until they give birth, as stated in the srat al-Talq [Q. 65:4], while slavegirls must wait two months, according to the Sunna. And it is not lawful for them to hide what God has created in their wombs, of child or menstruation, if they believe in God and the Last Day. Their mates, their spouses, have a better right to restore them, to bring them back, even if they refuse, in such time, that is, during the waiting period, if they desire to set things right, between them, and put pressure on the woman [to return]; the statement is not a condition for the possibility of return, but an incitement [to set things right] in the case of repealed divorce; the term ahaqq, better right to, does not denote any priority, since, in any case, no other person has the right to marry them during their waiting period; women shall have rights, due from their spouses, similar to those, rights, due from them, with justice, as stipulated by the Law, in the way of kind conjugality and not being harmed; but their men have a degree above them, in rights, as in their duty to obey their husbands, because of their [the husbands] payment of a dowry and their [husbands] being the bread-winners; God is Mighty, in His Kingdom, Wise, in what He has ordained for His creatures. (source) (please continue reading)

It not only denies women equal right to their inheritance (Q.4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their testimony alone is not admissible in court (Q.2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness, which of course is a joke. Rapists don't rape in the presence of witnesses.
11. Allah (thus) directs you as regards your Children's (Inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females: if only daughters, two or more, their share is twothirds of the inheritance; if only one, her share is a half. For parents, a sixth share of the inheritance to each, if the deceased left children; if no children, and the parents are the (only) heirs, the mother has a third; if the deceased Left brothers (or sisters) the mother has a sixth. (The distribution in all cases ('s) after the payment of legacies and debts. Ye know not whether your parents or your children are nearest to you in benefit. These are settled portions ordained by Allah. and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise. 12. In what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child; but if they leave a child, ye get a fourth; after payment of legacies and debts. In what ye leave, their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child; but if ye leave a child, they get an eighth; after payment of legacies and debts. If the man or woman whose inheritance is in question, has left neither ascendants nor descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third; after payment of legacies and debts; so that no loss is caused (to any one). Thus is it ordained by Allah. and Allah is All-knowing, Most Forbearing. This is what Ibn Kathir stated, concerning the above passages. Tafsir Ibn Kathir

Learning the Various Shares of the Inheritance is Encouraged

This, the following, and the last honorable Ayah in this Surah contain the knowledge of Al-Fara'id, inheritance. The knowledge of Al-Fara'id is derived from these three Ayat and from the Hadiths on this subject which explain them. Learning this knowledge is encouraged, especially the specific things mentioned in the Ayat. Ibn Uyaynah said; "Knowledge of Al-Fara'id was called half of knowledge, because it effects all people.''

The Reason Behind Revealing Ayah 4:11

Explaining this Ayah, Al-Bukhari recorded that Jabir bin Abdullah said, "Allah's Messenger came visiting me on foot with Abu Bakr at Banu Salamah's (dwellings), and the Prophet found me unconscious. He asked for some water, performed ablution with it, then poured it on me, and I regained consciousness. I said, `What do you command me to do with my money, O Allah's Messenger?' this Ayah was later revealed, ( Allah commands you for your children's (inheritance); to the male, a portion equal to that of two females)." This is how it was recorded by Muslim and An-Nasa'i. The remainder of the Six compilers also collected this Hadith. Another Hadith from Jabir concerning the reason behind revealing Ayah 4:11 Ahmad recorded from Jabir that he said, "The wife of Sa`d bin Ar-Rabi came to Allah's Messenger and said to him, `O Allah's Messenger! These are the two daughters of Sa`d bin Ar-Rabi, who was killed as a martyr at Uhud. Their uncle took their money and did not leave anything for them. They will not be married unless they have money.' The Messenger said, `Allah will decide on this matter.' The Ayah about the inheritance was later revealed and the Messenger of Allah sent word to their uncle commanding him, Give two-thirds (of Sa`d's money) to Sa`d's two daughters and one eighth for their mother, and whatever is left is yours.'' Abu Dawud, At-Tirmidhi, and Ibn Majah collected this Hadith. It is apparent, however, that the first Hadith from Jabir was about the case of the last Ayah in the Surah (4:176, rather than 4:11), for at the time this incident occurred, Jabir had sisters and did not have daughters, parents or offspring to inherit from him. Yet, we mentioned the Hadith here just as Al-Bukhari did.

Males Get Two Times the Share of Females for Inheritance

Allah said, ... Allah commands you for your children's (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females; Allah commands: observe justice with your children. The people of Jahiliyyah used to give the males, but not the females, a share in the

inheritance. Therefore, Allah commands that both males and females take a share in the inheritance, although the portion of the males is twice as much as that of the females. There is a distinction because men need money to spend on their dependants, commercial transactions, work and fulfilling their obligations. Consequently, men get twice the portion of the inheritance that females get. Allah's statement, ( Allah commands you for your children's (inheritance): to the male, a portion equal to that of two females); testifies to the fact that Allah is more merciful with children than their own parents are with them, since He commands the parents to be just and fair with their own children. An authentic Hadith stated that; a captured woman was looking for her child and when she found him, she held him, gave him her breast and nursed him. The Messenger of Allah said to his Companions, would willingly throw her child in the fire? They said, "No, O Messenger of Allah.'' He said, By Allah! Allah is more merciful with His servants than this woman is with her own child. Al-Bukhari recorded that Ibn Abbas said, "The custom (in old days) was that the property of the deceased would be inherited by his offspring; as for the parents (of the deceased), they would inherit by the will of the deceased. Then Allah cancelled whatever He willed from that custom and ordained that the male get twice the amount inherited by the female, and for each parent a sixth (of the whole legacy), for the wife an eighth or a fourth, and for the husband a half or a fourth.'' (source) *In Islam, the Man has a greater responsibility concerning wealth and income. The male is required to take care of his wife or the women in his family until they are married. The males have promises and debt to pay back and have to sustain their families household, therefore it is a neccessity for the Males to receive more, in order to fulfill their obligative duty. Ibn Kathir stated the following; "Therefore, Allah commands that both males and females take a share in the inheritance, although the portion of the males is twice as much as that of the females. There is a distinction because men need money to spend on their dependants, commercial transactions, work and fulfilling their obligations. Consequently, men get twice the portion of the inheritance that females get."

NEXT!
282. O ye who believe! When ye deal with each other, in transactions involving future obligations in a fixed period of time, reduce them to writing Let a scribe write down faithfully as between the parties: let not the scribe refuse to write: as Allah Has taught him, so let him write. Let him who incurs the liability dictate, but let him fear His Lord Allah, and not diminish aught of what he owes. If they party liable is mentally deficient, or weak, or unable Himself to dictate, Let his guardian dictate faithfully, and get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as ye choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her. The witnesses should not refuse when they are called on (For evidence). Disdain not to reduce to writing (your contract) for a future period, whether it be small or big: it is juster in the sight of Allah, More suitable as evidence, and more convenient to prevent doubts among yourselves but if it be a transaction which ye carry out on the spot among yourselves, there is no blame on you if ye reduce it not to writing. But take witness whenever ye make a commercial contract; and let neither scribe nor witness suffer harm. If ye do (such harm), it would be wickedness in you. So fear Allah. For it is Good that teaches you. And Allah is well acquainted with all things. If ye are on a journey, and cannot find a scribe, a pledge with possession (may serve the purpose). And if one of you deposits a thing on trust with another, let the trustee (faithfully) discharge his trust, and let him Fear his Lord conceal not evidence; for whoever conceals it, - his heart is tainted with sin. And Allah knoweth all that ye do. (Surah AlBaqarah 2:282/ Yusuf Ali Translation) * Tafsir al-Jalalayn O you who believe, when you contract, when you are dealing with, a debt, such as in prepayment for (future) delivery of goods or a loan, one upon another for a stated, a known, term, write it down, as confirmation and security against any dispute; and let a writer write it, the contract of debt, down between you justly, accurately, not increasing or decreasing the amount or the terms; and let not any writer refuse to write it down, if he is requested for such a task, as God has taught him (the kf of ka-m, as, is semantically connected to the verb yaba, refuse), that is, just as He has given him the advantage of knowing how to write, he should not be niggardly in this respect; so let him write (repeated for emphasis), and let the debtor dictate, to the one writing the contract, for he is the one being witnessed, and must be fully aware of his obligations; and

let him fear God his Lord, when dictating, and not diminish anything of it, of the debt due. And if the debtor be a fool, a squanderer, or weak, not up to dictating on account of old age or immaturity, or unable to dictate himself, on account of being dumb, or not knowing the language and so forth, then let his guardian, the one in charge of his affairs, be it a parent, an executor, a custodian or an interpreter, dictate justly. And summon to bear witness, the debt, two witnesses, men, mature Muslim free men; or if the two, witnesses, be not men, then one man and two women, to bear witness, such witnesses as you approve of, on account of their piety and probity; the number of women is because of the fact, so that if one of the two women errs, forgets the testimony, given their lesser astuteness and accuracy; the other, the one remembering, will remind her (read fa-tudhakkira or fa-tudhkira), the one that has forgotten the reminding clause is the reason [for the choice of two women], that is to say, so that she may be reminded if she errs or strays into error, because this [forgetfulness] is the cause of it (a variant reading [for an, that] has the conditional in, if, with [the verb inflected as] tudhakkiru, she will remind, making it a new sentence, the response to which [follows]); and let the witnesses not refuse, whenever (the m of idh m, whenever, is extra) they are summoned, to bear witness and take responsibility for the testimony; and be not disdainful, lazy, to write it down, that which you have witnessed in truth (for this frequently occurred), be it, small or great, a little or much, with its term, that is, the date on which it is due (il ajlihi is a circumstantial qualifier referring to the [pronominal suffix] h of taktub-hu, you write it down); that, writing down, is more equitable, more just, in Gods sight, more upright for testimony, that is to say, [that is] more helpful in summoning witness, because it contains the reminder; and nearer, closer to attaining [the desired state] that you will not be in doubt, with regard to the amount and the due dates; unless it be, [that] there is, trade carried out there and then (tijratun hdiratun: a variant reading has tijratan hdiratan, in which case the nominal sentence is missing its subject, and must be the pronoun for tijra, trade, that is, hiya, it [fem. *Ali Sina has accused the Noble Qur'an of allowing for a womens testimony to be invalidated if she is raped, therefore justice would not follow through. This passage is about legality, and writing out a contract when dealing with debt and other financial matters, and has ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the wild assertions put forward by this Goofy Emperor (Ali Sina). The reason for having 2 women as witnesses is a precaution just in case one of them women forget because of their lesser astuteness and accuracy in the matter. In fact, a

womans brain and memory is different from a males, in that they are more capable of remembering things dealing with emotion rather than things dealing tactical and visual things. This is what the Experts say concerning it, "Women often remember details of romantic anniversaries and get frustrated when their men can't reciprocate. We're all different, but there is some biological basis in women's abilities to recall these specifics: Men and women have different ways of forming memories. According to researchers, women's memories are heavily influenced by the brain's emotional center [source: Gray]. In other words, a woman is likely to remember specific details of an event if it causes an emotional reaction. On the other hand, men's memories are more tactical and visual. As a result, a man tends to more easily remember a room's layout or directions on how to get somewhere. Interestingly, women remember female faces better than men do [source: Branan]. One possible explanation for this is that women view other women as potential threats." (source) http://curiosity.discovery.com/question/emotions-sexes-different-role-brains (please continue reading)

But the most shocking verse is where Allah allows Muslims to rape women captured in wars even if they are married before being captured (Q.4:24) (Q.4:3).
The holy prophet raped the prettiest women he captured in his raids on the same day he killed their husbands and loved ones. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and rape their women. Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bengali women in 1971 and massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are un-Islamic. This is why the prison guards in the Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah. We at WIO seek to be competent and elucid in our research and information, and in doing so we acknowledge that there are several passages dealing with the Muslims 'right hand possessions'. Such narrations are found in the following Quranic verses; (see below) (Surah An-Nisa 4:3), (4:24), (4:25), (4:36) (Surah An-Nahl 16:71) (Surah Al-Mu'minun 23:6) (Surah An-Nur 24:31) (24:58) (Surah Ar-Rum 30:28) (Surah Al-Ahzab 33:50), (33:52), (33:55)

(Surah Al-Ma'arij 70:30) Though there are several ayah dealing with what the Muslims 'right hand possesses', its important to know that none of these passages sanction the act of rape, neither does it sanction abuse and torture. Let us review the passages provided by Ali Sina and then turn to the Sahih Hadith and renown Muslim commentators. (see below) 3. If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice. (Surah An-Nisa 4:3/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 24. Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise. (Surah An-Nisa 4:24/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Ibn Kathir commented on the above passage(s) and stated the following, Tafsir Ibn Kathir Allah said, ... Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess. The Ayah means, you are prohibited from marrying women who are already married, ( except those whom your right hands possess) except those whom you acquire through war, for you are allowed such women after making sure they are not pregnant. Imam Ahmad recorded that Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri said, "We captured some women from the area of Awtas who were already married, and we

disliked having sexual relations with them because they already had husbands. So, we asked the Prophet about this matter, and this Ayah was revealed, ( Also (forbidden are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess). Consequently, we had sexual relations with these women.'' (source) -In the above narration, one such as Ali Sina asserts that the women who were captured were raped (forcefully made to had sex). However, there is not statement or evidence to support the claim that these women were forcefully assaulted sexually. One would then question; "What woman would want to have sex with a man who just killed her husband?" This is where the answer comes in effectively to those who have knowledge. The women who were captured in battles or after the war had subsided, they were no longer free women. They became the war captives [e.g. slaves of the Muslims], (from the enemies of Islam), the same enemy which slayed the Muslims, tormented the Muslims, drove the Muslims from their homes, destroyed their property, and in some cases, they were just people who fought sternly against Almighty Allah(swt) and his Messenger(saaw). Shaykh al-Shanqeeti (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: "The reason why a person may be taken as a slave is his being a kaafir and waging war against Allaah and His Messenger. If Allaah enables the Muslims who are striving and sacrificing their lives and their wealth and all that Allaah has given them to make the word of Allaah supreme over the kaafirs, then He allows them to enslave the kuffaar when they capture them, unless the ruler chooses to free them or to ransom them, if that serves the interests of the Muslims." -The misconception concerning these women are the following; (1) They were prostituted from one Muslim man to the next. (2) They were forcefully made to have sexual intercourse in the presents of their husbands (3) They were beaten, blungered and attacked (4) They were mistreated, abused, and humiliated The above mentioned are unjust treatments and we challenge any critic such as Ali Sina to produce an authentic Islamic source which states that the Muslims (during the time of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) were committing such atrocities to their war captives (slaves, right hand possessions) either male or female, we also challenge to produce a command from the Noble Qur'an or Sahih Hadith that sanctions the treatment of slaves or war captives in the above mentioned manner. (Please Visit our articles on slavery in Islam for more information) * Slavery In Islam -The Elevated Rank

* War Captives - The Treatment of War Captives in Islam In fact, to the contrary, we learn that the Muslims treated these (slave, right hand possessions) mor ekindly and respectful than that of other woman in other cultures, who were made as war captives. This was the view and opinion of 'Adwa al-Bayaan, 3/387' "Islam limited the sources of slaves which existed before the mission of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to just one source, namely slavery resulting from capturing prisoners from among the kuffaar. Islam treated female slaves more kindly in their enslavement than other cultures did. Their honour was not considered to be permissible to anyone by way of prostitution, which was the fate of female prisoners of war in most cases. Rather Islam made them the property of their masters alone, and forbade anyone else to also have intercourse with them, even if that was his son. Islam made it their right to become free through a contract of manumission; it encouraged setting them free and promised reward for that. Islam made setting slaves free an obligation in the case of some kinds of expiation (kafaarah), such as the expiation for accidental killing, zihaar (a jaahili form of divorce in which a man said to his wife, You are to me as my mothers back), and breaking oaths. They received the best treatment from their masters, as was enjoined by the pure shareeah."

NEXT!
Ali Sina then claims that the Pakistani Soldiers (Muslims) raped a quarter of a million people and slayed over 3 million unarmed civilians. (as shown below) "Pakistani soldiers raped up to 250,000 Bengali women in 1971 and massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are un-Islamic. This is why the prison guards in the Islamic regime of Iran rape the women and then kill them after calling them apostates and the enemies of Allah." Ali Sina, don't equate the actions of Pakistani Soldiers with the teachings of Islam. The statement of 250,000 Bengali Women being raped and 3,000,000 unarmed civilians being killed. This information is not an agreed upon number, rather the statements led by the Indian government; (see below) Main article: 1971 Bangladesh atrocities "Bangladesh became an independent nation, the world's third most populous Muslim state. Mujibur Rahman was released from a West Pakistani prison, returned to Dhaka on 10 January 1972 and to become first President of Bangladesh and later its Prime Minister. On the brink of defeat around 14 December, the Pakistani Army, and its local

collaborators, systematically killed a large number of Bengali doctors, teachers and intellectuals,[75][76] part of a pogrom against the Hindu minorities who constituted the majority of urban educated intellectuals.[77][78] Young men, especially students, who were seen as possible rebels were also targeted. The extent of casualties in East Pakistan is not known. R.J. Rummel cites estimates ranging from one to three million people killed.[79] Other estimates place the death toll lower, at 300,000. Bangladesh government figures state that Pakistani forces aided by collaborators killed three million people, raped 200,000 women and displaced millions of others.[80] In 2010 Bangladesh government set up a tribunal to prosecute the people involved in alleged war crimes and those who collaborated with Pakistan.[81] According to the Government, the defendants would be charged with Crimes against humanity, genocide, murder, rape and arson.[82]" (source) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971 Ali Sina has engaged in the same fallacy that we analyzed previously, the fallacious reasoning of 'Hasty Generalization' notice what he is saying. He has declared that the Pakistani Soldiers raped 250,000 women (although his source says 200,000) then he said this is the reason why Islamic regime of Iran, rape the woman and then kill them, calling them apostates and enemies of Almighty Allah(swt). Really??? Conveninently, Ali Sina overlooks his very source which states that the Bangladesh people have killes anywhere between 1 to 3 million people according to R.J. Rummel and 300,000 according to other sources. (NOTE: Here we are not comparing the amount of lives lost, rather we are demonstrating the inconsistency in Ali Sina's position. Ali Sina equated the un-Islamic actions of Pakistani Soldiers, and then asserts that this is the underlining reason why the Islamic regime of Iran commits their attrocities. Question: Is the Islamic world governed by the actions of the Islamic regime of Iran, or by the Noble Qur'an and Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam)? (please continue reading)

Ali Sina said;

The whole Quran is full of verses that teach killing of unbelievers and how Allah would torture them after they die. There are no lessons on morality, justice, honesty, or love. The only message of the Quran is to believe in Allah and his messenger. The Quran coaxes people with celestial rewards of unlimited sex with fair houris in paradise and threatens them with blazing fires of hell. When the Quran speaks of righteousness, it does not mean righteousness as we understand it, but it means belief in Allah and his messenger. A Muslim can be a killer and murder non-Muslims and yet be a righteous person. Good actions are secondary. Belief in Allah and his messenger are the ultimate purpose of a persons life.

After reading the Quran I became greatly depressed. It was hard to accept it all. At first I denied and searched for esoteric meanings to these cruel verses of the Quran, all in vain. There was no misunderstanding! The Quran was overwhelmingly inhumane. Of course it contained a lot of scientific heresies and absurdities, but they were not what impacted me the most. It was the violence of this book that really jolted me and shook the foundation of my belief.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

Ali Sina you are debunked eternally, the Noble Qur'an is an instruction to the guidance of mankind, the passages dealing with any type of 'killing' is for the battle-field or slaughtering of animals, it is not senseless murder as you are seeking to potray it as. Then you say that there is no lessons on morality, justice, honesty, or love. (see below) DEF/ Morality: principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. a particular system of values and principles of conduct, especially one held by a specified person or society: [Oxford Dictionaries] -http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/morality?region=us

Noble Qur'an on Morality:

53. And remember We gave Moses the Scripture and the Criterion (Between right and wrong): There was a chance for you to be guided aright. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:53/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 185. Ramadhan is the (month) in which was sent down the Qur'an, as a guide to mankind, also clear (Signs) for guidance and judgment (Between right and wrong). So every one of you who is present (at his home) during that month should spend it in fasting, but if any one is ill, or on a journey, the prescribed period (Should be made up) by days later. Allah intends every facility for you; He does not want to put to difficulties. (He wants you) to complete the prescribed period, and to glorify Him in that He has guided you; and perchance ye shall be grateful. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:185/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 3. It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book, confirming what went before it; and He sent down the Law (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) before this, as a guide to mankind, and He sent down the criterion (of judgment between right and wrong). (Surah Al-Imran 3:3/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

Similar Qur'an Narrations on Morality (Surah Al-Imran 3:57), (Surah Al-Imran 3:104), (Surah Al-Imran 3:110) (Surah Al-Imran 3:114), (Surah Al-Imran 3:172), (Surah Al-Anfal 8:29) (Surah Al-Hajj 22:41), (Surah Ash-Shura 42:42),(Surah Al-Hadid 57:25) (Surah Ash-Shams 91:8) Ali Sina you are the raunchiest individual who ever has walked on the face of this earth. To our dear readers, how can anyone take a single testimony of this sadistic looney individual seriously? This is the same man who claimed to have read the complete Qur'an in such a way, that he would return to the Arabic until he was comfortable with its meaning. The same man who has made dozens upon dozens of claims in his alleged 'Apostasy Story' which have been debunked completely? This is the same man who will not only misrepresent, but completely and blatantly lie concerning Islamic doctrine just to appease the minds of those who are ignorant. Lets continue..... DEF/ Just[ice]: based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair: [Oxford Dictionaries] -http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/just?region=us

Noble Qur'an on Just[ice]

193. And fight them on until there is no more Tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah. but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression. (Surah A-Baqarah 2:193/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 18.There is no god but He: That is the witness of Allah, His angels, and those endued with knowledge, standing firm on justice. There is no god but He, the Exalted in Power, the Wise. (Surah Al-Imran 3:18/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 5.To those weak of understanding Make not over your property, which Allah hath made a means of support for you, but feed and clothe them therewith, and speak to them words of kindness and justice. (Surah An-Nisa 4:5/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Similar Qur'an Narrations on Justice (Surah An-Nisa 4:8), (Surah An-Nisa 4:49) (Surah An-Nisa 4:58), (Surah An Nisa 4:114), (Surah An-Nisa 4:127), (Surah An-Nisa 4:135), (Surah Al-Maidah 5:8),

(Surah Al-Anam 6:115), (Surah Al-Anam 6:151), (Surah Al-Anam 6:152), (Surah Al-A'raf 7:29), (Surah Al-A'raf 7:159), (Surah Al-A'raf 7:181), (Surah Al-Anfal 8:39), (Surah Yunus 10:4), (Surah Yunus 10:47), (Surah Yunus 10:54), (Surah An-Nahl 16:76), (Surah An-Nahl 16:90), (Surah Ambiya 21:47), (Surah Al-Mu'minun 23:41), (Suran An-Naml 27:60), (Surah Luqman 31:15), (Surah Saba 34:26), (Surah Sad 38:26), (Surah Az-Zumar 39:75), (Surah Ghafir 40:20), (Surah Ghafir 40:78), (Surah Ash-Shura 42:42), (Surah Al-Hujurat 49:2), (Surah Az-Zhariyat 51:6), (Surah Az-Zhariyat 51:12), (Surah Ar-Rahman 55:7), (Surah Al-Hadid 57:25), (Surah Al-Mumtahina 60:10), (Surah At-Talaq 65:2), (Surah Al-Jinn 72:14) The Noble Qur'an also speaks against injustice in the following passages; 25. But how (will they fare) when we gather them together against a day about which there is no doubt, and each soul will be paid out just what it has earned, without (favour or) injustice? (Surah Al-Imran 3:25/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 108. These are the Signs of Allah. We rehearse them to thee in Truth: And Allah means no injustice to any of His creatures. (Surah Al-Imran 3:108/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 3. If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice. (Surah An-Nisa 4:3/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Similar Qur'an Narrations on Injustice (Surah An-Nisa 4:30), (Surah An-Nisa 4:124), (Surah An-Nisa 4:148), (Surah Ibrahim 14:34), (Surah Nahl 16:90), (Surah Al-Kahf 18:49), (Surah Sad 38:22), (Surah Ghafir 40:17), (Surah Ghafir 40:31), (Surah Al-Ahqaf 46:19), (Surah Qaf 50:29), (Surah Al-Jinn 72:13) Ali Sina! How did you in your reading of the Noble Qur'an (attentively) miss out on the 40 ayah dealing with Justice? Ali Sina! How did you in your reading of the Noble Qur'an (attentively) miss out on the 15 ayah dealing with Almighty Allah(swt's) instruction and punishment and disapproval of those who practice Injustice? *Furthermore, there are 38 Hadith Narrations (i.e. Sahih Bukhari, Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud and Malik's Muwaatta) that speak about Justice. How did you overlook those

Ahadith? There are 20 Hadith Narrations (i.e. Sahih Bukhari, Muslim, Sunan Abu Dawud and Malik's Muwaataa) that speak about Injustice. How did you overlook those Ahadith? hmmm... I smell an angry LIAR who seeks to gain fame and popularity through ignorance and rebellion.

DEF/ Honest[y]: free of deceit and untruthfulness; sincere: [Oxford Dictionaries] -http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/honest?region=us

Noble Qur'an on Honest(y)

Considering the overwhelming amount of passages in the Noble Qur'an, dealing with honesty or moreover 'Truth', we will briefly mention the ayah which deal with truth. Almighty Allah(swt) has Created All Things in Truth, He has guided man to truth, He has instructed that man be truthful, He has abhored the disbelievers who were untruthful etc... Now because of these large amounts of ayah dealing with a variety of 'truth' (316 Ayah dealing with 'Truth') we will only post those ayah which instruct man to be truthful. 39. While he was standing in prayer in the chamber, the angels called unto him: "(Allah) doth give thee glad tidings of Yahya, witnessing the truth of a Word from Allah, and (be besides) noble, chaste, and a prophet,- of the (goodly) company of the righteous." (Surah Al-Imran 3:39/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 93. All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel Made unlawful for itself, before the Law (of Moses) was revealed. Say: "Bring ye the Law and study it, if ye be men of truth." (Surah Al-Imran 3:93/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 171. O People of the Book! Commit no excesses in your religion: Nor say of Allah aught but the truth. Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him: so believe in Allah and His apostles. Say not "Trinity" : desist: it will be better for you: for Allah is one Allah. Glory be to Him: (far exalted is He) above having a son. To Him belong all things in the heavens and on earth. And enough is Allah as a Disposer of affairs. (Surah An-Nisa 4:171/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

70. Leave alone those who take their religion to be mere play and amusement, and are deceived by the life of this world. But proclaim (to them) this (truth): that every soul delivers itself to ruin by its own acts: it will find for itself no protector or intercessor except Allah. if it offered every ransom, (or reparation), none will be accepted: such is (the end of) those who deliver themselves to ruin by their own acts: they will have for drink (only) boiling water, and for punishment, one most grievous: for they persisted in rejecting Allah. (Surah Al-Anam 6:70/ Yusuf Ali Translation) (Please Visit our articles dealing with the moral character of a Muslim, for more information) *The Moral Character of A Muslim. Furthermore, Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) instructed the Muslims to be truthful (see below) The Book of Virtue, Good Manners and Joining of the Ties of Relationship (Kitab AlBirr was-Salat-I-wa'l-Adab) Muslim :: Book 32 : Hadith 6309 'Abdullah reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: It is obligatory for you to tell the truth, for truth leads to virtue and virtue leads to Paradise, and the man who continues to speak the truth and endeavours to tell the truth is eventually recorded as truthful with Allah, and beware of telling of a lie for telling of a lie leads to obscenity and obscenity leads to Hell-Fire, and the person who keeps telling lies and endeavours to tell a lie is recorded as a liar with Allah. -Moreover, Almighty Allah(swt) promises to Grant Paradise for those who were truthful. 119. Allah will say: "This is a day on which the truthful will profit from their truth: theirs are gardens, with rivers flowing beneath,- their eternal Home: Allah well-pleased with them, and they with Allah. That is the great salvation, (the fulfilment of all desires). (Surah Al-Maidah 5:119/ Yusuf Ali Translation) (Please Visit our articles dealing with the reward(s) of Paradise) *Paradise -The Blessings for Being Truthful *The Rewards of Paradise for Those Who Believe

DEF/ Love: an intense feeling of deep affection [Oxford Dictionaries] -http://oxforddictionaries.com/search?dictionaryVersion=region-

us&isWritersAndEditors=true&page=1&pageSize=10&q=love&searchUri=All&sort=alp ha&type=dictionarysearch

Noble Qur'an on Love

-Love in the Noble Qur'an is expressed through Almighty Allah(swt) and the Believers, also a Husband and Wife. Love can also be expressed through mercy as well, the terms are some what synonomous. (see below) 222. They ask thee concerning women's courses. Say: They are a hurt and a pollution: So keep away from women in their courses, and do not approach them until they are clean. But when they have purified themselves, ye may approach them in any manner, time, or place ordained for you by Allah. For Allah loves those who turn to Him constantly and He loves those who keep themselves pure and clean. (Surah Al-Baqarah 2:222/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 31. Say: "If ye do love Allah, Follow me: Allah will love you and forgive you your sins: For Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah Al-Imran 3:31/ Yusuf Ali Translation) 76. Nay.- Those that keep their plighted faith and act aright,-verily Allah loves those who act aright. (Surah Al-Imran 3:76/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

-Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) said this concerning the love of Almighty Allah(swt). [see below] Beginning of Creation Bukhari :: Book 4 :: Volume 54 :: Hadith 431 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "If Allah loves a person, He calls Gabriel saying, 'Allah loves so andso; O Gabriel! Love him.' Gabriel would love him and make an announcement amongst the inhabitants of the Heaven. 'Allah loves so-and-so, therefore you should love him also,' and so all the inhabitants of the Heaven would love him, and then he is granted the pleasure of the people on the earth." (Please Visit our articles dealing with the love in Islam for more information) * The Love Between A Husband & Wife * The Love Between Muslim Brothers

* The Love of Almighty Allah(swt) -Ali Sina! Did you honestly believe that a Muslim organization would not debunk your fallacious claims against Islam? You received popularity through your lies and deceptions, however, Islam is the truth and those who adhere to it truthfully acknowledge that truth. We at WIO would now request that you remain in absolute silence and never speak on Islam again. ATTENTION READERS: As we have demonstrated consistently, Ali Sina is a LIAR and DECEIVER and has no moral integrity. We can refute him all day long, but we will no longer address him on a 'word by word' basis, as his claims have proven to be wild and unsubstanciated. Therefore, we will provide links for our readers to review, demonstrating the complete lies of Ali Sina and his critical ministry of deceit. His remaining claims are as follows, Houris in Paradise, Scientific absurdities.... *The Divine Science - A Comprehensive Study of The Miracles of Islam *The Maiden Wife's of Paradise (Please continue reading below)

Ali Sina said;

The treacherous passage to enlightenment: After my bitter experience with the Quran I found myself traveling on a torturous road riddled with torments. I was kicked out of the blissful garden of ignorance, where all my questions were answered. There I did not have to think. All I had to do was believe. Now,the gates to that garden were closed to me forever. I had committed the unthinkable sin of thinking. I had eaten from the forbidden tree of knowledge, and my eyes had been opened. I could see the fallacy of it all and my own nakedness. I knew I would not be let into that paradise of oblivion again. Once you start thinking, you don't belong there anymore. I had only one way to go and that was forward. This road to enlightenment proved to be more arduous than I was prepared for. It was slippery. There were mountains of obstacles to climb and precipices of errors to avert. I traveled uncharted territories alone, not knowing what I would find next. It would become my odyssey in the realm of understanding and discovering truth, eventually leading me to the land of enlightenment and freedom. I will chart these territories for all those who also commit the sin of thinking, find themselves kicked out of the paradise of ignorance and are en route to an unknown destination.

If you doubt, if the mantle of ignorance in which you wrapped yourself is shredded to pieces and you find yourself naked, know that you cannot stay in the paradise of ignorance any longer. You have been cast out forever. Just as a child, once out of the womb, cannot go back, you will not be readmitted into that blissful garden of oblivion again. Listen to one who has been there and done that, and don't cling despondently to the gates. That door is locked. Instead look forward. You have a trip ahead of you. You can fly to your destination or you can crawl. I crawled! But because I crawled, I know this path quite well. I will chart the road, so hopefully you don't have to crawl. The passage from faith to enlightenment consists of seven valleys.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "After my bitter experience with the Quran I found myself traveling on a torturous road riddled with torments. I was kicked out of the blissful garden of ignorance, where all my questions were answered. There I did not have to think. All I had to do was believe. Now,the gates to that garden were closed to me forever. I had committed the unthinkable sin of thinking. I had eaten from the forbidden tree of knowledge, and my eyes had been opened. I could see the fallacy of it all and my own nakedness. I knew I would not be let into that paradise of oblivion again. Once you start thinking, you don't belong there anymore. I had only one way to go and that was forward." Well its obvious that you had a bitter experience with the Noble Qur'an, and that is primarily due to your lack of sincerity, lack of integrity and lack of knowledge concerning Islam and its doctrines. The only road that was riddled with torments, was the road that you have created an an outward extension, only solidifying our belief that you are the Emperor of the mighty 'Air Castle'. Now contrary to what you think, you remained in the pit of shameless ignorance, and it is nearly impossible for you to leave something which you had no part of to begin with, all your questions were answered? When did you ask questions? I thought you read the Qur'an cover to cover with great focus. You have committed the unthinkable sin of thinking? How is that considered a sin, when Almighty Allah(swt) addresses constantly "the Men of Understanding" and "those with knowledge" He(swt) also commands us to "Reason" and "Ponder over the verses of the Qur'an", therfore you did not commit a sin in thinking. Your intentions were impure and misguided. "This road to enlightenment proved to be more arduous than I was prepared for. It was slippery. There were mountains of obstacles to climb and precipices of errors to avert. I traveled uncharted territories alone, not knowing what I would find next. It would become my odyssey in the realm of understanding and discovering truth, eventually leading me to the land of enlightenment and freedom."

What road of enlightenment? We chuckle in embarassment for YOU, that you would even utter such words after being utterly refuted in your lies against Islam. Ali Sina you are a wizard of wordplay, your spouting baseless rhetoric to amuse and entertain the readers, it just doesn't work with us. As long as your words lack substance, we can only shake our heads at your tireless efforts. "I will chart these territories for all those who also commit the sin of thinking, find themselves kicked out of the paradise of ignorance and are en route to an unknown destination. If you doubt, if the mantle of ignorance in which you wrapped yourself is shredded to pieces and you find yourself naked, know that you cannot stay in the paradise of ignorance any longer. You have been cast out forever. Just as a child, once out of the womb, cannot go back, you will not be readmitted into that blissful garden of oblivion again. Listen to one who has been there and done that, and don't cling despondently to the gates. That door is locked. Instead look forward. You have a trip ahead of you. You can fly to your destination or you can crawl. I crawled! But because I crawled, I know this path quite well. I will chart the road, so hopefully you don't have to crawl. The passage from faith to enlightenment consists of seven valleys." The only territories that you can chart, is the one to the shameless pit of ignorance that you call home. Shame, shame, you silly man you. What do you mean, listen to the one who has been there and done that? The only thing you have been, is a complete ignoramous and the only thing you have done, is shown the world of your childish folly. We are aware of those seven valleys. According to you, they consist of the following; (1) Ignorance (2) Deception (3) Folly (4) Logical Fallacy (5) Lies (6) Hate Mongering (7) Imperial Air Castle

Ali Sina said;

Shock After reading the Quran my perspective of reality was jolted. I found myself standing face to face with the truth and I was scared to look at it. It certainly was not what I was expecting to see. I had no one to blame, to curse and call a liar. I found all the absurdities of Islam and inhumanity of its author by reading the Quran. And I was shocked. Only this shock made me come to my senses and face the truth. Unfortunately this is a very difficult, painful process. The followers of Muhammad must see the naked truth and they must be shocked. We cannot keep sugarcoating the truth. The truth is bitter and it must be accepted. Facts are stubborn and refuse to go away. Only then does the process of enlightenment start. But because each persons sensitivity is different, what shocks one person may not shock the other. Even as a man I was shocked when I read that Muhammad instructed his

followers to beat their wives and called women deficient in intelligence. Yet I have come to know many Muslim women who have no difficulty accepting these derogatory statements uttered by their prophet. Its not that they agree they are deficient in intelligence or they believe the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women just because the Prophet said so, but they simply block out that information. They read it, but it doesnt sink in. They are in denial. The denial acts as a shield that covers and protects them, that saves them from facing the pain of reality. Once that shield is up, nothing can bring it down. At this point their beliefs must be attacked from other directions. We have to bombard them with other shocking teachings of the Quran. They may have a weak spot for one of them. That is all they need: a good shock. Shocks are painful, but they can be lifesavers. Shocks are used by doctors to bring back to life a dead patient. For the first time, the Internet has changed the balance of power. Now the brutal force of the guns, prisons and death squads are helpless and the pen is almighty. For the first time Muslims cannot stop the truth by killing its messenger. Now a great number of them are coming in contact with the truth and they feel helpless. They want to silence this voice, but they cannot. They want to kill the messenger, but they cannot. They try to ban the sites exposing their cherished beliefs, sometimes they succeed momentarily, but most of the time they don't. I created a site to educate Muslims about true Islam. I hosted it at Tripod.com. The Islamists forced Tripod to shut it down and they cowardly complied to appease them Muslims. I got my domain and the site was back again in a couple of weeks. So the old way of killing the apostates, burning their books and silencing them by terror does not work. They cannot stop people from reading. Even though my site is banned in Saudi Arabia, Emirates and many other Islamic countries, a great number of Muslims who never knew the truth about Islam are being exposed to the truth for the first time, and are shocked. I met a lady on the net who converted to Islam and started to wear the Islamic veil. She had a web site with her picture completely covered in a black veil along with her story of how she became a Muslim. She was very active and she used to advise others not to read my writings. But when she read the story of Safiyah, the Jewish woman that Muhammad captured and raped after killing her father, husband and many of her relatives, she was shocked. She questioned other Muslims about this in vain. Then the door was open and she was cast out of the paradise of ignorance. She kept writing to me and asking questions. Finally, she passed through the other stages from blind faith to enlightenment very quickly and wrote thanking me for guiding her though this arduous path. She withdrew from the Yahoo Islamic clubs altogether. When people learn about the unholy life of Muhammad and the absurdities of the Quran they are shocked. I want to expose Islam, write the truth about Muhammads unholy life, his hateful words, his senseless assertions, and bombard Muslims with facts. They will be angry. They will curse me, insult me and tell me that after reading my articles their faith in Islam is strengthened. But that is when I know that I have sown the seed of doubt in their mind. They say all this because they are shocked and have entered the stage of denial. The seed of doubt is planted and it will germinate. In some people it takes years, but given the chance it will eventually germinate. Doubt is the greatest gift we can give to each other. It is the gift of enlightenment. Doubt will set us free, will advance knowledge, and will unravel the mysteries of this universe. Faith will keep us ignorant.

One of hurdles we have to overcome is the hurdle of tradition and false values imposed on us by thousands of years of religious upbringing. The world still values faith and considers doubt as the sign of weakness. People talk of men of faith with respect and disdain men of little faith. We are screwed up in our values. The word faith means belief without evidence; gullibility also means belief without evidence. Therefore there is no glory in faithfulness. Faithfulness means gullibility, credulity, susceptibility and easy to fleece. How can one be proud of such qualities? Doubt on the other hand means the reverse of the above. It means being capable of thinking independently, of questioning, and of being a skeptic. We owe our science and our modern civilization to men and women who doubted, not to those who believed. Those who doubted were the pioneers; they were the leaders of thought. They were philosophers, inventors, and discoverers. Those who believed lived and died as followers, made little or no contribution to the advancement of science and human understanding.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "After reading the Quran my perspective of reality was jolted. I found myself standing face to face with the truth and I was scared to look at it. It certainly was not what I was expecting to see. I had no one to blame, to curse and call a liar. I found all the absurdities of Islam and inhumanity of its author by reading the Quran. And I was shocked. Only this shock made me come to my senses and face the truth. Unfortunately this is a very difficult, painful process. The followers of Muhammad must see the naked truth and they must be shocked. We cannot keep sugarcoating the truth. The truth is bitter and it must be accepted. Facts are stubborn and refuse to go away. Only then does the process of enlightenment start." We are convinced that Ali Sina has never open the Qur'an and read a single ayah of it. It is our belief that most of the stuff Ali Sina asserts against Islam, are just rehashed and regurgitated trash from other anti-Islamic sources. Point#1 YOU HAVEN'T FOUND A SINGLE ABSURDITY IN THE NOBLE QUR'AN or ISLAM IN GENERAL. The only thing you found, is a way to be humiliated through TRUE KNOWLEDGE and wisdom (i.e. Noble Qur'an and Sahih Hadith). "But because each persons sensitivity is different, what shocks one person may not shock the other. Even as a man I was shocked when I read that Muhammad instructed his followers to beat their wives and called women deficient in intelligence. Yet I have come to know many Muslim women who have no difficulty accepting these derogatory statements uttered by their prophet. Its not that they agree they are deficient in intelligence or they believe the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women just because the Prophet said so, but they simply block out that information. They read it, but it doesnt sink in. They are in denial. The denial acts as a shield that covers and protects

them, that saves them from facing the pain of reality. Once that shield is up, nothing can bring it down. At this point their beliefs must be attacked from other directions. We have to bombard them with other shocking teachings of the Quran. They may have a weak spot for one of them. That is all they need: a good shock. Shocks are painful, but they can be lifesavers. Shocks are used by doctors to bring back to life a dead patient. For the first time, the Internet has changed the balance of power. Now the brutal force of the guns, prisons and death squads are helpless and the pen is almighty. For the first time Muslims cannot stop the truth by killing its messenger. Now a great number of them are coming in contact with the truth and they feel helpless. They want to silence this voice, but they cannot. They want to kill the messenger, but they cannot. They try to ban the sites exposing their cherished beliefs, sometimes they succeed momentarily, but most of the time they don't. I created a site to educate Muslims about true Islam. I hosted it at Tripod.com. The Islamists forced Tripod to shut it down and they cowardly complied to appease them Muslims. I got my domain and the site was back again in a couple of weeks. So the old way of killing the apostates, burning their books and silencing them by terror does not work. They cannot stop people from reading. Even though my site is banned in Saudi Arabia, Emirates and many other Islamic countries, a great number of Muslims who never knew the truth about Islam are being exposed to the truth for the first time, and are shocked." Ali Sina you are becoming more and more ridiculous as you continue to speak. We have already responded to your claim concerning the beating of wives, as far as calling women deficient is concerned, we advise you to read the Hadiths in their context and speak about the nature of women in full and not fragmented ignorance. But since we are convinced that you are incapable of reading (based on your allegations toward the Noble Qur'an) then we will provide our viewers with our articles. (Please Visit our articles dealing with the women in Islam and their rights, for more information) *The Precious Jewels of Islam *The Status of Women in Islam Furthermore, notice what Ali Sina did. He just accused the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) of stating that all women would be inhabitants of the Hell-Fire, but refused to give the context of the Hadith. Let us review the narration to silence this foolish deceiver. Menstrual Periods Bukhari :: Book 1 :: Volume 6 :: Hadith 301 Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Once Allah's Apostle went out to the Musalla (to offer the prayer) o 'Id-al-Adha or AlFitr prayer. Then he passed by the women and said, "O women! Give alms, as I have seen that the majority of the dwellers of Hell-fire were you (women)." They asked, "Why is it so, O Allah's Apostle ?" He replied, "You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your

husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion." -The following points are learned from the above narration; (1) The Prophet(saaw) ordered the woman whom he passed by to give charity, (it was Id al Adha or Id al Fitra), because he has seen that the majority of the inhabitants of the Hell-Fire were woman. [NOTE: Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was giving the women 'nasiha' (Advice) concerning good deeds, he encouraged them to give in charity as a way to add on to their account with hopes of being successful in this life and in the Hereafter. -The women questioned as to why the majority of inhabitants in the Hell-Fire were woman and he(saaw) said the following; (2) You CURSE frequently, and are UNGRATEFUL to your HUSBANDS. [NOTE: The Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) emphatically declared that the women curse frequently and they are ungrateful to their husbands. Cursing someone without right, whether it be verbal abuse or a damning curse it is undesirable and dangerous. Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) said the following regarding curses; General Behavior (Kitab Al-Adab) Dawud :: Book 41 : Hadith 4890 Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas: A man cursed the wind. The narrator Muslim's version has: The wind snatched away a man's cloak during the time of the Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) and he cursed it. The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Do not curse it, for it is under command, and if anyone curses a thing undeservedly, the curse returns upon him. Also, Almighty Allah(swt) has made the man, the protector and maintainer of the women, therefore it is the right of the man over the woman that he be shown respect and gratitude for his responsibility over the women. (3) Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) said; he has not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than women. Ali Sina is the King of Magic and bewitches the ignorant minds to the true teaching of

Islam. He is an illusionist and like to quote passages completely out of its immediate context so as to deceive the reader. However, truth will always obliterate falsehood, no matter ho sinister. Let us review the Sahih Hadith narration found in Bukhari, concerning the intellect of women and come to a conclusion as to why our noble Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) said what he did. (see below) "I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religion than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you." The women asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What is deficient in our intelligence and religion?" He said, "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" They replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Isn't it true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?" The women replied in the affirmative. He said, "This is the deficiency in her religion." So Why did Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) say that women were deficient in intelligence and religion? (see below) (I) He said; "Is not the evidence of two women equal to the witness of one man?" This is based on the physiological make up of the woman as compared to the man. As mentioned previously, science has proven that women are more susceptible with accurate memory when targeted by emotions or an emotional event preluding sed memory, whereas men are more prone with accurate memory dealing with things the are visual and tactical (i.e. directions, business transactions etc). The requirement of 2 woman in Islam for 1 man is for this reason, that the 2nd woman can be their to remind the 1st woman if she forgets (i.e. the details of an event). (see below) Tafsir Al-Jalalayn on Surah Al-Baqarah ayah 282 And summon to bear witness, the debt, two witnesses, men, mature Muslim free men; or if the two, witnesses, be not men, then one man and two women, to bear witness, such witnesses as you approve of, on account of their piety and probity; the number of women is because of the fact, so that if one of the two women errs, forgets the testimony, given their lesser astuteness and accuracy; the other, the one remembering, will remind her (read fa-tudhakkira or fa-tudhkira), the one that has forgotten the reminding clause is the reason [for the choice of two women], that is to say, so that she may be reminded if she errs or strays into error, (partial) [source] Therefore, the Muslim Community would appreciate it if Ali Sina would stop with this sickness of ignorance, it is a disease of the heart and mind. Seeking to misrpresent the teachings of Islam just to fulfill your propagandist objective is madness.

"I met a lady on the net who converted to Islam and started to wear the Islamic veil. She had a web site with her picture completely covered in a black veil along with her story of how she became a Muslim. She was very active and she used to advise others not to read my writings. But when she read the story of Safiyah, the Jewish woman that Muhammad captured and raped after killing her father, husband and many of her relatives, she was shocked. She questioned other Muslims about this in vain. Then the door was open and she was cast out of the paradise of ignorance. She kept writing to me and asking questions. Finally, she passed through the other stages from blind faith to enlightenment very quickly and wrote thanking me for guiding her though this arduous path. She withdrew from the Yahoo Islamic clubs altogether. When people learn about the unholy life of Muhammad and the absurdities of the Quran they are shocked. I want to expose Islam, write the truth about Muhammads unholy life, his hateful words, his senseless assertions, and bombard Muslims with facts. They will be angry. They will curse me, insult me and tell me that after reading my articles their faith in Islam is strengthened. But that is when I know that I have sown the seed of doubt in their mind. They say all this because they are shocked and have entered the stage of denial. The seed of doubt is planted and it will germinate. In some people it takes years, but given the chance it will eventually germinate." Sadly for you Ali Sina, your tactics as we spoke about previously, only work toward those who don't have full knowledge of Islam. Knowledge is key to understanding, therefore, a new Muslim revert who may hear information that they do not understand, without seeking the knowledge behind it, they will likely detur in their faith (If Almighty Allah(swt) Wills) and He Knows best those who stray in their hearts and those who are guided aright. Furthermore, the only seed you have planted, is the seed of humiliation. We are confident that once our viewers read that your whole conversion story was an EVIDENT hoax and propaganda attempt, they will reject you completely, or at least be humbled before the wisdom of Islam and give up their tirade of folly. "Doubt is the greatest gift we can give to each other. It is the gift of enlightenment. Doubt will set us free, will advance knowledge, and will unravel the mysteries of this universe. Faith will keep us ignorant. One of hurdles we have to overcome is the hurdle of tradition and false values imposed on us by thousands of years of religious upbringing. The world still values faith and considers doubt as the sign of weakness. People talk of men of faith with respect and disdain men of little faith. We are screwed up in our values. The word faith means belief without evidence; gullibility also means belief without evidence. Therefore there is no glory in faithfulness. Faithfulness means gullibility, credulity, susceptibility and easy to fleece. How can one be proud of such qualities? Doubt on the other hand means the reverse of the above. It means being capable of thinking independently, of questioning, and of being a skeptic. We owe our science and our modern civilization to men and women who doubted, not to those who believed. Those who doubted were the pioneers; they were the leaders of thought. They were philosophers, inventors, and discoverers. Those who believed lived and died as followers, made little or no contribution to the advancement of science and human

understanding." Ali Sina stop with your mindless rantings again, haven't you bewitched the minds of many innocent human beings alread? You claiming that 'Faith will keep us ignorant' is based on the fact, (that like you) many people base their trust simply in faith and not reason. Islam uses mans intellect as a lighthouse for his faith. Almighty Allah(swt) calls man to his comprehension and reasoning all througout the Noble Qur'an so as to increase him in faith, then ask the question 'Will you not then believe?' and 'which of the Signs of your Lord will you both Men and Jinn deny?'. As far as Science is concerned, the greatest of scientist will attest to the fact that there must be an All-Knowing Creator who has constructed the vastness of space and the intricate details of all living things. They don't necessarily call this Creator as 'God' but they say that he is certainly One and AllPowerful, and Infinitely Wise. The fact of the matter is, the more learned one is with Science, the closer one becomes to God [Almighty Allah-swt] however, the more ignorant one is to science, the further away they are pulled from Almighty Allah(swt). This is because He(swt) has created everything with Knowledge and Power and has revealed some of these things to His Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam).

Ali Sina said;

Denial After being shocked, or maybe simultaneously, one denies. The majority of Muslims are trapped in denial. They are unable and unwilling to admit the Quran is a hoax. They desperately try to explain the unexplainable, find miracles in it and would willingly bend all the rules of logic to prove that the Quran is right. Each time they are exposed to a shocking statement in the Quran or a reprehensible act performed by Muhammad they retreat in denial. This is what I did in the first phase of my journey. Denial is a safe place. It is the unwillingness to admit that you have been kicked out of the paradise of ignorance. You try to go back, reluctant to take the next step forward. In denial you find your comfort zone. In denial you are not going to be hurt, everything is okay; everything is fine. Truth is extremely painful, especially if one has been accustomed to lies all his life. It is not easy for a Muslim to see Muhammad for who he was. It is like telling a child that his father is a murderer, a rapist, and a thief. A child who adulates his father will not be able to accept it even if all the proofs in the world is shown to him. The shock is so great that all he can do is to deny it. He will call you a liar. hate you for hurting him, curse you, consider you his enemy, and may even explode in anger and physically attack you. This is the stage of denial. It is a self defense mechanism. If pain is too great, denial will take that pain away. If a mother is informed that her child has died in an accident, her first reaction is often denial. At the moment of great catastrophes, one is usually overwhelmed by a weary sense that this is all a bad dream and that eventually youll wake up and everything will be okay. But unfortunately facts are stubborn and will not

go away. One can live in denial for a while, but sooner or later the truth must be accepted. Muslims are cocooned in lies. Because speaking against Islam is a crime punishable by death, no one dares to tell the truth. Those who do, do not live long. They are quickly silenced. So how would you know the truth if all you hear are lies? On one hand the Quran claims to be a miracle and challenges anyone to produce a Surah like it. And if you are in doubt as to which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a sura like it, and call on your helper, besides Allah, if you are truthful. (Q: 2:23) Then it instructs its followers to kill anyone who dares to criticize it or challenge it. If you ever dare to take up the challenge and produce a Surah as poorly written as the Quran you will be accused of mocking Islam for which the punishment is death. In this atmosphere of insincerity and deceit, truth is the casualty. The pain of coming face to face with the truth and realizing all that we believed were lies is extremely agonizing. The only mechanism and natural way to deal with it is denial. Denial takes away the pain. It is a soothing bliss,even though it is hiding ones head in the sand. One cannot stay in denial forever. Soon the night will fall and the cold shivering reality freezes ones bones and you realize that you are out of the paradise of ignorance. That door is closed and the key has been thrown away. You know too much. You are an outcast. Fearfully you look at the dark and twining road barely visible in the twilight of your uncertainties and gingerly you take your first steps towards an unknown destiny. You grapple and fumble, reluctantly trying to stay focused. But fear overwhelms you and each time you try to run back to the garden you once again face the closed door. The great majority of Muslims live in denial. They stay behind the closed door. They cannot go back nor do they dare to walk away from it. Those who are inside the garden are those who never left it. This door will only let you out. You cannot get in. That blissful garden is the garden of certitude. It is reserved for the faithful, for those who do not doubt, for those who do not think. They believe anything. They would believe that night is day and day is night. They would believe that Muhammad climbed the seventh heaven, met with God, split the moon and conversed with jinns. As Voltaire said, those who believe in absurdities commit atrocities. They also believe that killing infidels is good, bombing is holy, stoning is divine, beating wives is prescribed by God, and hating unbelievers is the will of God. These inhabitants of the paradise of ignorance constitute the majority. Those who doubt are still the minority. These believers will never see the truth if they are permanently kept cocooned in lies. All they have heard so far is the lie that Islam is good and if only Muslims practiced true Islam, the world would become a paradise, that the problems of Islam are all the fault of Muslims. This is a lie. Most Muslims are good people. They are no worse and no better than others. Its Islam that makes them commit atrocities. Those Muslims who do bad things are those who follow Islam. Islam rears the criminal instinct in people. The more a person is Islamist, the more bloodthirsty, hate mongering, and zombie s/he becomes. I wanted to deny what I was reading. I wanted to believe that the real meaning of the Quran is something else, but I could not. I could no longer fool myself saying these inhumane verses were taken out of the context. The Quran does not have a context. Verses are jammed together at random often lacking any coherence.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "After being shocked, or maybe simultaneously, one denies. The majority of Muslims are trapped in denial. They are unable and unwilling to admit the Quran is a hoax. They desperately try to explain the unexplainable, find miracles in it and would willingly bend all the rules of logic to prove that the Quran is right. Each time they are exposed to a shocking statement in the Quran or a reprehensible act performed by Muhammad they retreat in denial. This is what I did in the first phase of my journey. Denial is a safe place. It is the unwillingness to admit that you have been kicked out of the paradise of ignorance. You try to go back, reluctant to take the next step forward. In denial you find your comfort zone. In denial you are not going to be hurt, everything is okay; everything is fine." The Muslims are trapped in denial? They are unable and unwilling to admit the Qur'an is hoax? Your ignorance is now beyond laughable, its simply disgusting and unintelligent. It is illuminous to the Muslims that the only denial we suffer from is believing that we you were ever a Muslim. The miracles in the Noble Qur'an are true and authentic, and in fact, it is critics and uneducated people such as yourself who will bend all realms of rationale and logic just to reject the Divine instruction of the Noble Qur'an. There are no shocking statements in the Noble Qur'an, neither are there reprehensible acts of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). We Muslims are not retreating to denial, in fact the exact opposite is true, if there is a passage which the non-Muslims find questionable, we address it with full clarity and evidence, and if their is an unauthentic Hadith narration attributed to Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) or some fallacious historical account, we will debunk it. Ali Sina, the more you speak and let words depart from that sinister mouth, the more nutty you sound. Trying to communicate with your readers in parables and poetry, this is absurd in totality. "Truth is extremely painful, especially if one has been accustomed to lies all his life. It is not easy for a Muslim to see Muhammad for who he was. It is like telling a child that his father is a murderer, a rapist, and a thief. A child who adulates his father will not be able to accept it even if all the proofs in the world is shown to him. The shock is so great that all he can do is to deny it. He will call you a liar. hate you for hurting him, curse you, consider you his enemy, and may even explode in anger and physically attack you. This is the stage of denial. It is a self defense mechanism. If pain is too great, denial will take that pain away. If a mother is informed that her child has died in an accident, her first reaction is often denial. At the moment of great catastrophes, one is usually overwhelmed by a weary sense that this is all a bad dream and that eventually youll wake up and everything will be okay. But unfortunately facts are stubborn and will not go away. One can live in denial for a while, but sooner or later the truth must be

accepted. Muslims are cocooned in lies. Because speaking against Islam is a crime punishable by death, no one dares to tell the truth. Those who do, do not live long. They are quickly silenced. So how would you know the truth if all you hear are lies? On one hand the Quran claims to be a miracle and challenges anyone to produce a Surah like it. And if you are in doubt as to which We have revealed to Our servant, then produce a sura like it, and call on your helper, besides Allah, if you are truthful. (Q: 2:23)" Ali Sina is just spouting more baseless rhetoric and lacks anything substantial. You and your wild claims will continuously be debunked as long as the Noble Qur'an exist (Eternal) and the Sahih Hadith exist (Eternal). Speaking against Islam is a crime punishable by death? We would appreciate it if Ali Sina would be ever so kind as to provide his readers with authentic narrations from the Qur'an or Sahih Hadith which teach to kill someone for speaking against Islam. "Then it instructs its followers to kill anyone who dares to criticize it or challenge it. If you ever dare to take up the challenge and produce a Surah as poorly written as the Quran you will be accused of mocking Islam for which the punishment is death. In this atmosphere of insincerity and deceit, truth is the casualty. The pain of coming face to face with the truth and realizing all that we believed were lies is extremely agonizing. The only mechanism and natural way to deal with it is denial. Denial takes away the pain. It is a soothing bliss,even though it is hiding ones head in the sand. One cannot stay in denial forever. Soon the night will fall and the cold shivering reality freezes ones bones and you realize that you are out of the paradise of ignorance. That door is closed and the key has been thrown away. You know too much. You are an outcast. Fearfully you look at the dark and twining road barely visible in the twilight of your uncertainties and gingerly you take your first steps towards an unknown destiny. You grapple and fumble, reluctantly trying to stay focused. But fear overwhelms you and each time you try to run back to the garden you once again face the closed door." Ali Sina! We are still waiting ever so patiently for you to provide a SINGLE ayah from the Noble Qur'an, or an authentic Hadith narration which states that the one who questions or contradicts the teachings of the Noble Qur'an shall be put to death. Don't worry, we'll wait... Again! He is not saying anything consequential. This wizard has a tendency of reciting his dark poetry in the aspirations of enchanting the minds of the readers. However, his attempts are futile and he will not beguile the WIO. "The great majority of Muslims live in denial. They stay behind the closed door. They cannot go back nor do they dare to walk away from it. Those who are inside the garden are those who never left it. This door will only let you out. You cannot get in. That blissful garden is the garden of certitude. It is reserved for the faithful, for those who do not doubt, for those who do not think. They believe anything. They would believe that night is day and day is night. They would believe that Muhammad climbed the seventh

heaven, met with God, split the moon and conversed with jinns. As Voltaire said, those who believe in absurdities commit atrocities. They also believe that killing infidels is good, bombing is holy, stoning is divine, beating wives is prescribed by God, and hating unbelievers is the will of God. These inhabitants of the paradise of ignorance constitute the majority. Those who doubt are still the minority. These believers will never see the truth if they are permanently kept cocooned in lies. All they have heard so far is the lie that Islam is good and if only Muslims practiced true Islam, the world would become a paradise, that the problems of Islam are all the fault of Muslims. This is a lie. Most Muslims are good people. They are no worse and no better than others. Its Islam that makes them commit atrocities. Those Muslims who do bad things are those who follow Islam. Islam rears the criminal instinct in people. The more a person is Islamist, the more bloodthirsty, hate mongering, and zombie s/he becomes. I wanted to deny what I was reading. I wanted to believe that the real meaning of the Quran is something else, but I could not. I could no longer fool myself saying these inhumane verses were taken out of the context. The Quran does not have a context. Verses are jammed together at random often lacking any coherence." Muslims live in denial to the assertion that you were once Muslim. Your knowledge of Islam is foolishly displaced and your failing miserably with your eternal deceit. Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) did reach the 7th on the night of al-Mira'aij, he did meet with Almighty Allah(swt) [In His prescence, he did not see Him], and he did split the moon, and this was testified by several witnesses during the 7th century. (Please Visit our articles on the miracles of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) for more information) *Miracles Performed by Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) So it's not the Muslims who are bad, but it is Islam that licenses the bad actions? You attempted this previously and we demonstrated that you are a fallicious embellisher of the arts of wizardry and deception. The Qur'an has no context? Are you kidding us? The context of the Noble Qur'an, is the reasoning behind why each verse was revealed (either during a dispute, battle, business, previous revelation etc) Ali Sina your lies just never end, this is precisely our point, your a goofy Emperor residing in his Air Castle.

Ali Sina said;

Confusion Those who read my articles and are hurt by what I say about the Quran and Islam are lucky. They have me to blame. They can hate me, curse me and direct all their anger at me. But when I read the Quran and learned about its content, I could not blame anyone. After going through the stages of shock and denial, I was confused and started to blame myself. I hated myself for thinking, for doubting and finding fault with what I regarded

to be the words of God. Like all other Muslims, I was exposed to and accepted all the many lies, absurdities and inhumanities. I was brought up as a religious person. I believed in whatever I was told. These lies were given to me in small doses, gradually, since my childhood. I was never given an alternative to compare. It is like vaccination. I was immune to the truth. But when I started to read the Quran seriously from cover to cover and understood what this book is actually saying. I felt nauseated. All those lies suddenly appeared in front of me. I had heard them all and had accepted them. My rational thinking was numbed. I had become insensitive to the absurdities of the Quran. When I found something that did not make sense, I brushed it off and said to myself that one has to look at the big picture. That idyllic big picture, however, was nowhere to be found except in my own mind. I pictured a perfect Islam. So all those absurdities did not bother me because I paid no attention to them. When I read the whole Quran I discovered a distinctly different picture than the one in my mind. The new picture of Islam emerging from the pages of the Quran was violent, intolerant, irrational, arrogant, a far cry from Islam as a religion of peace, equality and tolerance. In the face of this much absurdity, I had to deny it, to keep my sanity. But how long I could keep denying the truth when it was out like the sun right in front of me? I was reading the Quran in Arabic so I could not blame a bad translation. Later I read other translations. I realized many translations in English are not entirely reliable. The translators had tried very hard to hide the inhumanity and the violence in the Quran by twisting the words and adding their own words sometimes in parenthesis or brackets to soften its harsh tone. The Arabic Quran is more shocking than its English translations. I was confused and I did not know where to turn. My faith had beeen shaken and my world had crumbled. I could no longer deny what I was reading. But I could not accept the possibility that this was all a huge lie. How could it be, I kept asking myself. that so many people have not seen the truth and I could see it? How could great seers like Jalaleddin Rumi did not see that Muhammad was an impostor and that the Quran is a hoax, and I see it? It was then that I entered the stage of guilt.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "Those who read my articles and are hurt by what I say about the Quran and Islam are lucky. They have me to blame. They can hate me, curse me and direct all their anger at me. But when I read the Quran and learned about its content, I could not blame anyone. After going through the stages of shock and denial, I was confused and started to blame myself. I hated myself for thinking, for doubting and finding fault with what I regarded to be the words of God. Like all other Muslims, I was exposed to and accepted all the many lies, absurdities and inhumanities. I was brought up as a religious person. I believed in whatever I was told. These lies were given to me in small doses, gradually, since my childhood. I was never given an alternative to compare. It is like vaccination. I was immune to the truth. But when I started to read the Quran seriously from cover to cover and understood what this

book is actually saying. I felt nauseated. All those lies suddenly appeared in front of me." Those who read your articles and were hurt, shouldn't have been. They were tragically mislead and terribly misinformed by your lies and deceptions. As you shouldv'e hated to question the Divine Wisdom of Almighty Allah(swt), He is the Creator and Sustainer of All-things and nothing is Hidden from His Absolute Knowledge, His Comprehension extends over the Heavens and the earth, none can Grasp His Knowledge, except those whom He Wills. The hypocrisy of Ali Sina grows more severe with every dreadfully inconsistent quote from him. Notice what this lying deceitful person said; (see below) " I was brought up as a religious person." but previously we learned the following in his introduction to his story; (see below) "I was born into a moderately religious family. On my mothers side I have a few relatives who are Ayatollahs. Although my grandfather (whom I never met) was somewhat a skeptic, we were believers. My parents were not fond of the mullahs. In fact, we did not have much to do with our more fundamentalist relatives. We liked to think of ourselves as believing in true Islam, not the one taught and practiced by the mullahs." This man has no compunction for his fabrications, rather he proves himself to be a shameless person time and time again. Next this hypocrite said; (see below) "I believed in whatever I was told." but previously we learned the following; (see below) "You could say I always had a mind of my own and was a maverick in my thinking. No matter what I was taught, I always came to my own conclusion and did not believe what I was told." Will the ignorant folly of this silly Emperor of deception, not end? Ali Sina has the the mental classification of a pathological liar. He is hypocritical, deceptive, and terribly inconsistent. According to the research study by USC college, this is what they say regarding pathological liars; (see below) "A USC study has found the first proof of structural brain abnormalities in people who habitually lie, cheat and manipulate others.

While previous research has shown that there is heightened activity in the prefrontal cortex the area of the brain that enables most people to feel remorse or learn moral behavior when normal people lie, this is the first study to provide evidence of structural differences in that area among pathological liars. The research led by Yaling Yang and Adrian Raine, both of the USC College of Letters, Arts and Sciences is published in the October issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry. The subjects were taken from a sample of 108 volunteers pulled from Los Angeles temporary employment pool. A series of psychological tests and interviews placed 12 in the category of people who had a history of repeated lying (11 men, one woman); 16 who exhibited signs of antisocial personality disorder but not pathological lying (15 men, one woman); and 21 who were normal controls (15 men, six women). We looked for things like inconsistencies in their stories about occupation, education, crimes and family background, said Raine, a psychology professor at USC and coauthor of the study. Pathological liars cant always tell truth from falsehood and contradict themselves in an interview. They are manipulative and they admit they prey on people. They are very brazen in terms of their manner, but very cool when talking about this. Let us continue reading... "I had heard them all and had accepted them. My rational thinking was numbed. I had become insensitive to the absurdities of the Quran. When I found something that did not make sense, I brushed it off and said to myself that one has to look at the big picture. That idyllic big picture, however, was nowhere to be found except in my own mind. I pictured a perfect Islam. So all those absurdities did not bother me because I paid no attention to them. When I read the whole Quran I discovered a distinctly different picture than the one in my mind. The new picture of Islam emerging from the pages of the Quran was violent, intolerant, irrational, arrogant, a far cry from Islam as a religion of peace, equality and tolerance. In the face of this much absurdity, I had to deny it, to keep my sanity. But how long I could keep denying the truth when it was out like the sun right in front of me? I was reading the Quran in Arabic so I could not blame a bad translation. Later I read other translations. I realized many translations in English are not entirely reliable. The translators had tried very hard to hide the inhumanity and the violence in the Quran by twisting the words and adding their own words sometimes in parenthesis or brackets to soften its harsh tone. The Arabic Quran is more shocking than its English translations." Ali Sina you are the most dishonorable human being who has ever critiqued Islam. You continue to create these stories of you having knowledge of the Noble Qur'an, but as we continue to review your claims, we debunk you and leave you humiliated by your own deceit. Everything mentioned above is just rehashed rhetoric, nothing new that we haven't

already addressed. With that being said, lets continue... "I was confused and I did not know where to turn. My faith had beeen shaken and my world had crumbled. I could no longer deny what I was reading. But I could not accept the possibility that this was all a huge lie. How could it be, I kept asking myself. that so many people have not seen the truth and I could see it? How could great seers like Jalaleddin Rumi did not see that Muhammad was an impostor and that the Quran is a hoax, and I see it? It was then that I entered the stage of guilt." Very ditzy indeed. As we have demonstrated previously (as we continue to do) you were never a Muslim! You never had faith! You are and always have been an anti-Islamic propagandist looking for fame and attention. Note: How can Ali Sina emphatically declared that 'Muhammad was an impostor' if he himself is now a Godless being (Atheist)? Under what criterion is Ali Sina determining the validity of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam)? If he says; "I am determining it, based on the lies of the Qur'an?" How could you base his validity on that, if the lies of the Qur'an were beliefs upheld and sanctioned by Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam)? Again! Under what criterion or yard stick (measurement of proof) are you using to falsify him? (please continue reading)

Ali Sina said;

Guilt The guilt lasted for many months. I hated myself for having these thoughts. I felt God was testing my faith. I felt ashamed. I spoke with learned people whom I trusted, people who were not only knowledgeable but whom I thought were wise. I heard very little that could quench the burning fire within me. One of these learned men told me not to read the Quran for a while. He told me to pray and read only books that would strengthen my faith. I did that, but it did not help. The thoughts about the absurd, sometimes ruthless, ridiculous verses of the Quran kept throbbing in my head. Each time I looked at my bookshelf and saw that book, I felt pain. I took it and hid it behind the other books. I thought if I do not think about it for a while my negative thoughts would go away and I would regain my faith once again. But they didnt go away. I denied as much as I could,

until I could no longer. I was shocked, confused, felt guilty and it was painful. This period of guilt lasted too long. One day I decided enough is enough. I told myself that it is not my fault. I am not going to carry this guilt forever thinking about things that make no sense to me. If God gave me a brain, it is because he wants me to use it. If what I perceive as right and wrong is skewed, then it is not my fault. He tells me killing is bad and I know it is bad because I do not want to be killed. Then why did his messenger kill so many innocent people and order his followers to kill those who do not believe? If rape is bad, and I know it is bad because I do not want it to happen to people I love, why did Allah's prophet rape the women he captured in war? If slavery is bad, and I know it is bad because I hate to lose my freedom and become a slave, why has the Prophet of God enslaved so many people and made himself rich by selling them? If imposition of religion is bad, and I know that it is bad because I do not like another person to force on me a religion that I dont want, then why did the Prophet eulogize Jihad and exhort his followers to kill unbelievers, take their booty, and distribute their women and children as spoils of war? If God tells me something is good, and I know that it is good because it feels good to me, then why did his prophet do the opposite of that thing?

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "The guilt lasted for many months. I hated myself for having these thoughts. I felt God was testing my faith. I felt ashamed. I spoke with learned people whom I trusted, people who were not only knowledgeable but whom I thought were wise. I heard very little that could quench the burning fire within me. One of these learned men told me not to read the Quran for a while. He told me to pray and read only books that would strengthen my faith. I did that, but it did not help. The thoughts about the absurd, sometimes ruthless, ridiculous verses of the Quran kept throbbing in my head. Each time I looked at my bookshelf and saw that book, I felt pain. I took it and hid it behind the other books. I thought if I do not think about it for a while my negative thoughts would go away and I would regain my faith once again. But they didnt go away. I denied as much as I could, until I could no longer. I was shocked, confused, felt guilty and it was painful." Ali Sina said; "I spoke with learned people whom I trusted, people who were not only knowledgeable but whom I thought were wise." Notice this previous statement from Ali Sina, it will show that in light of what he said in the above, this means that he was receiving his information from ignorant hypocrites who had NO KNOWLEDGE. (see below) Ali Sina said earlier; "I hung around with my Muslim friends and noticed that most of them lived a very immoral life of double standards. Most of them found girlfriends and slept with them.

That was very un-Islamic, or so I thought at that time. What bothered me most was the fact that they did not value these girls as real human beings who deserved respect. These girls were not Muslim girls and therefore were used just for sex. This attitude was not general. Those who made less show of religiosity were more respectful and sincere towards their western girlfriends and some even loved them and wanted to marry them. Paradoxically. those who were more religious were less faithful towards their girlfriends. I always thought that true Islam is what is right. If something is immoral, unethical, dishonest or cruel, it cannot be Islam. I could not see how the behavior of these immoral and callous Muslims could be the result of what was taught in Islam." PREMISE#1: Ali Sina states that he spoke with learned men who told him NOT to READ THE QUR'AN and to PRAY and read books to increase his faith. [NOTE: Ali Sina does not clarify who these 'learned people' were. We cannot assume that he is making reference to Muslims, but if he isn't, then his claims are already invalidated, and if he is, then how does the following make sense. PREMISE#2: Ali Sina said in the beginning/middle of his story that he hung around with Muslims friends and most of them lived very immoral double standard lives. He further states that those who made less show of religiousity were MORE RESPECTFUL AND SINCERE to their girlfriends. And the ones who were MORE RELIGIOUS were less faithful towards their girlfriends. Then he adds conclusively that IF something is IMMORAL, UNETHICAL, DISHONEST or CRUEL, it cannot be Islam. He could not see how the behavior of these IMMORAL and CALLOUS MUSLIMS could be the result of what was taught in Islam. [NOTE: Presumably from the context of these men's words, they wre RELIGIOUS (e.g. they instructed him to pray and read books to increase his faith] If the above is so, then conclusively this is what we draw from his assertions. (1) Ali Sina spoke with learned men who told him NOT to READ THE QUR'AN and to pray and read books (presumably Islamic ones) that would increase his faith. (i.e. religious men, based on their instruction for him to pray and read more) (2) According to Ali Sina, the Muslims who act MORE RELIGIOUS are less respectful, Immoral, Unethical, Dishonest or Cruel. FINALLY: This would mean, that the men who spoke with Ali Sina were hypocrites and immoral and dishonest, therefore led Ali Sina astray in their sayings. Proof in this is also found in them instructing him not to read the Kalam of Almighty Allah(swt) [i.e. the Noble Qur'an]. How can Ali Sina claim that the good advise from wise men was unsuccessful, when according to his logic, they were immoral, dishonest, cruel and unethical people? Furthermore, He said;

"This period of guilt lasted too long. One day I decided enough is enough. I told myself that it is not my fault. I am not going to carry this guilt forever thinking about things that make no sense to me. If God gave me a brain, it is because he wants me to use it. If what I perceive as right and wrong is skewed, then it is not my fault. He tells me killing is bad and I know it is bad because I do not want to be killed. Then why did his messenger kill so many innocent people and order his followers to kill those who do not believe? If rape is bad, and I know it is bad because I do not want it to happen to people I love, why did Allah's prophet rape the women he captured in war? If slavery is bad, and I know it is bad because I hate to lose my freedom and become a slave, why has the Prophet of God enslaved so many people and made himself rich by selling them? If imposition of religion is bad, and I know that it is bad because I do not like another person to force on me a religion that I dont want, then why did the Prophet eulogize Jihad and exhort his followers to kill unbelievers, take their booty, and distribute their women and children as spoils of war? If God tells me something is good, and I know that it is good because it feels good to me, then why did his prophet do the opposite of that thing?" Ali Sina! Almighty Allah(swt) has given every single human being intellect, but you like many others fail to utilize it. You said that Almighty Allah(swt) tells you that killing is bad. WRONG! Do not continue to blatantly lie on the Noble Qur'an or the words of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). No where in the Noble Qur'an has Almighty Allah(swt) forbid killing, indeed we have to kill animals for their meat and other benefits. Murder is Haraam in Islam, (Murder is an unjust killing). Killing animals for food is not unjust (Halal), killing enemies on the battlefield who persecuted Muslims, drove them from their homes, destroyed and sold their property and openly humiliated them, is not Murder. In fact, the same erroneous claim that Ali Sina made against the Noble Qur'an is the same one made by critics of the Bible. They claim that the Bible teaches 'Thou Shall Not Kill' but yet so many nations and tribes were slaughtered. "Thou Shall not Kill" [Exodus 20:13] However, the hebrew word used is 'ratsach' which correctly means [Murder] and not Kill. "Thou Shall not Murder [Exodus 20:13/ New International Version] Therefore, we would appreciate it if Ali Sina not invent sayings of the Noble Qur'an, either put up (i.e. the ayah) or shut up. Then he begins saying that Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) made himself rich by owning and selling slaves, and that he raped people (war captives- right hand possesses) etc. All of these claims have been addressed with illuminous clarity earlier, he is just rehashing his same nonsensical garbadge.

(please continue reading)

Ali Sina said;

Disillusionment When this guilt was lifted off my shoulders, dismay, disillusionment, or cynicism followed. I felt sorry for having wasted so many years of my life,and for all the Muslims who are still trapped in these foolish beliefs, for all those who lost their lives in the name of these false doctrines, for all the women in virtually all the Islamic countries who suffer all sorts of abuses and oppression.s. They do not even know they are being abused. I thought of all the wars waged in the name of religion, so many people died for nothing. Millions of believers left their homes and families to wage war in the name of God, never to return, thinking they are spreading faith in God. They massacred millions of innocent people. Civilizations were destroyed, libraries were burned, and so much knowledge was lost, for nothing. I recalled my father waking up in the early hours of the morning and in the icy water of the winter performing voodoo. I recalled him coming home hungry and thirsty during the month of fasting, and I thought of the billions of people who torture themselves in this way for nothing. The realization that all that I believed were lies and all that I did was a waste of my life, and the fact that a billion other people are still lost in this arid desert of ignorance chasing a mirage that to them appears to be water was disappointing. Prior to that God was always in the back of my mind. I used to talk to him in my imagination and those conversations seemed me. I thought God was watching and taking account of every good act that I did. The feeling that someone was watching over me, guiding my steps and protecting me was very comforting. It was difficult to accept that there is no such thing as Allah and even if there is a God, it is not Allah. I did not give up the belief in God, but by then I knew for sure that if this universe has a maker, it cannot be the deity that Muhammad had envisioned. Allah was ignorant to the core. The Quran is full of errors. No creator of this universe could be as stupid as the god of the Quran appeared to be. Allah could not have existed anywhere else except in the mind of a sick Man. I understood that he was but a figment of Muhammads imagination and nothing more. How disappointed I was when I realized all these years I had been praying to a fantasy.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "When this guilt was lifted off my shoulders, dismay, disillusionment, or cynicism followed. I felt sorry for having wasted so many years of my life,and for all the Muslims who are still trapped in these foolish beliefs, for all those who lost their lives in the name

of these false doctrines, for all the women in virtually all the Islamic countries who suffer all sorts of abuses and oppression.s. They do not even know they are being abused. " The Emperor is still residing at the penacle of shamelessness and is shouting stupidity at the top of his 'Royal Lungs of Folly'. (full stop) "I thought of all the wars waged in the name of religion, so many people died for nothing. Millions of believers left their homes and families to wage war in the name of God, never to return, thinking they are spreading faith in God. They massacred millions of innocent people. Civilizations were destroyed, libraries were burned, and so much knowledge was lost, for nothing. I recalled my father waking up in the early hours of the morning and in the icy water of the winter performing voodoo. I recalled him coming home hungry and thirsty during the month of fasting, and I thought of the billions of people who torture themselves in this way for nothing. The realization that all that I believed were lies and all that I did was a waste of my life, and the fact that a billion other people are still lost in this arid desert of ignorance chasing a mirage that to them appears to be water was disappointing." Ali Sina continously without fail, distributes tall tales of ignorance and untruth. Then he seeks to call the practice of 'Wu'du' (Ablution) as voodoo, oh Ali Sina you are so farsighted. Torture ourselves from fasting? Ali Sina, your lies and daffy statements will not produce results with true knowledge. The benefits of Fasting are incredible. (see below) Fasting Can Help You! Hello, I'm Dr. Alan Goldhamer. Over the past 25 years, I have monitored over 7000 fasts. When properly utilized, fasting is a safe and effective means of maximizing the bodys selfhealing capacities. The results can be truly amazing. I would like to share the benefits of fasting to you. I invite you to watch a free video on the benefits of fasting. In this video, I explain: how you can benefit from fasting whether you should consider fasting where and how to undergo a fast I have seen many conditions respond to fasting, including: Cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension Gastrointestinal diseases such colitis or irritable bowel syndrome Diabetes Uterine Fibroid Tumors Back and neck pain Addictions

(source) http://www.healthpromoting.com/benefits-of-fasting (Please Visit our articles dealing with Fasting and its benefits, for more information) *Spiritual and Physical Benefits of Fasting *The Superior Fasting *Fasting Prescribed for All Prophets Furthermore, he said; "Prior to that God was always in the back of my mind. I used to talk to him in my imagination and those conversations seemed me. I thought God was watching and taking account of every good act that I did. The feeling that someone was watching over me, guiding my steps and protecting me was very comforting. It was difficult to accept that there is no such thing as Allah and even if there is a God, it is not Allah. I did not give up the belief in God, but by then I knew for sure that if this universe has a maker, it cannot be the deity that Muhammad had envisioned. Allah was ignorant to the core. The Quran is full of errors. No creator of this universe could be as stupid as the god of the Quran appeared to be. Allah could not have existed anywhere else except in the mind of a sick Man. I understood that he was but a figment of Muhammads imagination and nothing more. How disappointed I was when I realized all these years I had been praying to a fantasy." This is just insulting, down right offensive. But what should we expect, coming from a sinful, deceitful, treacherous, Godless, shameless animal such as Ali Sina. Throughout his entire 'Fairy Tale of Apostasy' he has been creating lies, hate mongering, and just being outright 'Poetically Silly' lacking true substance and truth. No the Noble Qur'an is NOT FULL OF ERRORS No Almighty Allah(swt) is NOT STUPID No you have NOT been PRAYING, and Almighty Allah(swt) is NOT A FANTASY *We feel like we are speaking with a child... (Please continue reading)

Ali Sina said;

Depression This feeling of loss and disappointment was accompanied by a sense of sadness, or some kind of depression. It was as if my whole world had fallen apart. I felt like the ground I was standing on was no longer there and I was falling into a bottomless pit. Without

exaggerating, it felt like I was in hell. I was bewildered, pleading for help and no one could help. I felt ashamed of my thoughts and hating myself for having such thoughts. The guilt was accompanied by a profound sense of loss and depression. As a rule, I am a positive thinker. I see the good side of everything. I always think tomorrow is going to be better than today. I am not the kind of person who is easily depressed. But this feeling of loss was overwhelming. I still recall that weight in my heart. I thought God has forsaken me and I did not know why. Is that Gods punishment? I kept asking myself. I do not remember hurting anyone ever. I went out of my way to help anyone whose life crossed mine and asked me for help. So, why did God want to punish me in this way? Why was He not answering my prayers? Why has He left me to myself and these thoughts I could find no answers to? Does he want to test me? Then where were the answers to my prayers? Would I pass this test if I became stupid and stopped using my brain? If so, why did he give me a brain? Would only dumb people pass the test of faith? I felt betrayed and violated. I cannot say which feeling was predominant. At times I was disillusioned, sad, or dismayed. Even if faith is false, it is still sweet. It is very comforting to believe. Juxtaposing my feelings of sadness and loss, I felt liberated. Curiously I no longer felt confused or guilty. I knew for sure the Quran was a hoax and Muhammad was an impostor. To overcome this sadness I tried to keep myself busy with other activities. I even took dancing lessons and experienced what it means to be alive, to be free of guilt, to enjoy life and to just be normal. I realized how much I had missed out on and how foolishly I deprived myself of the simple pleasures of life. Of course denial is the way cults exert their control over thier believers. I denied myself the simplest pleasures of life, was living in constant fear of God, and I thought this was normal. I am talking of pleasures like sleeping in the morning, dancing, dating, or sipping a glass of fine wine.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "This feeling of loss and disappointment was accompanied by a sense of sadness, or some kind of depression. It was as if my whole world had fallen apart. I felt like the ground I was standing on was no longer there and I was falling into a bottomless pit. Without exaggerating, it felt like I was in hell. " Well to without exaggerating, you are exaggerating and fallaciously embellishing on your fantastical story of apostasy. ATTENTION to Ali Sina! You WERE NEVER A MUSLIM. "I was bewildered, pleading for help and no one could help. I felt ashamed of my thoughts and hating myself for having such thoughts. The guilt was accompanied by a

profound sense of loss and depression. As a rule, I am a positive thinker. I see the good side of everything. I always think tomorrow is going to be better than today. I am not the kind of person who is easily depressed. But this feeling of loss was overwhelming. I still recall that weight in my heart. I thought God has forsaken me and I did not know why. Is that Gods punishment? I kept asking myself. I do not remember hurting anyone ever. I went out of my way to help anyone whose life crossed mine and asked me for help. So, why did God want to punish me in this way? Why was He not answering my prayers? Why has He left me to myself and these thoughts I could find no answers to? Does he want to test me? Then where were the answers to my prayers? Would I pass this test if I became stupid and stopped using my brain? If so, why did he give me a brain? Would only dumb people pass the test of faith? I felt betrayed and violated. I cannot say which feeling was predominant. At times I was disillusioned, sad, or dismayed. Even if faith is false, it is still sweet. It is very comforting to believe." Why didn't Almighty Allah(swt) answer your prayers? You are a comical genius! Asking does Almighty Allah(swt) want to test you, I thought you read the complete Qur'an in Arabic and were solidified in your understanding of it. As we showed earlier, you overlooked hundreds of verses and yet had a "Complete Understanding" of Islam. Hmmmm... thats kind of suspect. Maybe you overlooked this passage as well; (see below) 2. Do men think that they will be left alone on saying, "We believe", and that they will not be tested? 3. We did test those before them, and Allah will certainly know those who are true from those who are false. (Surah Al-Ankabut 29:1-2/ Yusuf Ali Translation)

Question: Ali Sina! Why did you think you would be left alone on saying "I Believe" and that you wouldn't be tested? hmmm... didn't you read this passage? Ali Sina! Almighty Allah(swt) did test those who were before you, and He will certainly Know those who are true, from those who are FALSE (Ali Sina) At times??? Ali Sina! What ever do you mean? Your are currently and eternally dismayed, disllusioned and sad. Will you not learn? "Juxtaposing my feelings of sadness and loss, I felt liberated. Curiously I no longer felt confused or guilty. I knew for sure the Quran was a hoax and Muhammad was an impostor. To overcome this sadness I tried to keep myself busy with other activities. I even took

dancing lessons and experienced what it means to be alive, to be free of guilt, to enjoy life and to just be normal. I realized how much I had missed out on and how foolishly I deprived myself of the simple pleasures of life. Of course denial is the way cults exert their control over thier believers. I denied myself the simplest pleasures of life, was living in constant fear of God, and I thought this was normal. I am talking of pleasures like sleeping in the morning, dancing, dating, or sipping a glass of fine wine." Again! Ali Sina is determining the validity of Muhammad(saaw)'s prophethood, based on what criterion? (i.e. Biblical) Then this frolicing tap dance superstar, said that he took dance lessons and EXPERIENCED 'what it means to be alive, to be free of guilt, to enjoy life and to just be normal'. Wow! We are truly astonished, we were not aware that DANCING LESSONS offered so much reward like making someone feel guiltless. Absolutely histerical. Then he says he realized how much he had missed out on and how foolishly he deprived himself of simple pleasures of life. A Muslim can't take dance lessons with his wife? Pleasures of sleeping in the mornin, dancing, dating or sipping a glass of wine. It's our belief that the people who claim to have 'apostated' from Islam, are the ones who were incapable of being sincere to their intentions upon reverting or practicing Islam. We learn this from the following statement of Ali Sina, (see below) "I am talking of pleasures like sleeping in the morning, dancing, dating, or sipping a glass of fine wine." SLEEPING IN THE MORNING: Ali Sina is incapable of getting up in the morning to Worship His Lord, Almighty Allah(swt) who created him when he was nothing. Who ordained As-Salah for the human beings as a 'direct communication' between Man and his Lord. Any Muslim is capable of sleeping in the morning and it goes as follows; (1) Wake up and Praise Almighty Allah(swt) for restoring you and returning your soul and consciousness to you after your temporary death (sleep) (2) Go to the restroom and before entering say your du'a seeking protection and refuge in Almighty Allah(swt) from the male and female devils who inhabit it. (3) Head to the sink and perform the Wu'du (Ablution), then exit the bathroom and asking Almighty Allah(swt) to forgive you. (Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad-salalahu alayhi wasalaam). (4) Make way to your place of prayer and perform Salatul Fajr (5-10) minutes or however long you intend to praise your Lord (in accordance with the Sunnah for Fajr -i.e. 2 rakats ONLY) (5) Return to your bed and go back to sleep for a wonderful mornings rest. [NOTE: The above mentioned steps, can be completed in 5 minutes. Also spending 5 to 10 minutes worshipping Almighty Allah(swt).] Ali Sina! Are you incapable of giving 10 minutes of worship to your Lord? And you were

a true Muslim, yet you couldn't handle this simple task? hmmmm.... interesting. DANCING: Ali Sina is incapable of dancing with his wife (or waiting until he is married) or going to the dancing hall and practicing with a female relative. A Muslim is allowed to dance with his wife. However, it may not be recommended to dance with your wife in a public setting where other males can view your wife and begin potential lust for her. DATING & SIPPING WINE: This is absolutely Haram (Prohibited), and is the misguided desires of the shaytan in the dunyaa. Dating in Islam is forbidden and the proper course for marriage must be exercised on the authority of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). *What we acknowledge from the above, is that Ali Sina is pleased to have left Islam because it gives him a chance to consume alcohol and date (possible illegal sexual intercourse) with various partners. Ali Sina is immoral at heart and dishonest with himself concerning Islam. Ali Sina, you were a fraud from the beginning, you were never a Muslim. You are a product of the dunyaa and the disbelievers in Almighty Allah(swt). (Please continue reading)

Ali Sina said;

Anger At this time, I entered another stage of my spiritual journey to enlightenment. I became angry. Angry for having believed those lies for so many years, for wasting so many years of my life chasing a wild goose. Angry at my culture for betraying me, for the wrong values it gave me, with my parents for teaching me a lie, with myself for not thinking before, for believing in lies, trusting an impostor, with God for letting me down, for not intervening and stopping the lies that were being disseminated in His name. When I saw pictures of millions of Muslims who, with so much devotion, went to Saudi Arabia, many of them spending their lifes savings to perform hajj, I became angry with the lies these people were brought up with. When I read someone had converted to Islam, something Muslims love to advertise and make a big issue of I became saddened and angry. I was sad for that poor soul and angry with the lies. I was angry with the whole world that tries to protect this lie, defend it, and even abuse you if you raise your voice to try to tell them what you know. It is not just Muslims, but even westerners who do not believe in Islam. Its okay to criticize anything but Islam. What amazed me and made me even angrier was the resistance I faced when I tried to tell others that Islam is not the truth.

Fortunately this anger did not last long. I knew that Muhammad was no messenger of God but a charlatan, a demagogue whose only intention was to beguile people and satisfy his own narcissistic ambitions. I knew all those childish stories of a hell with scorching fire and a heaven with rivers of wine, milk and honey. orgies, were the figments of a sick, wild, insecure and bullying mind of a man in desperate need to dominate and affirm his own authority. I realized I could not be angry with my parents; for they did their best and taught me what they thought to be the best. I could not be angry with my society or culture because my people were just as misinformed as my parents and myself. Afer some thought, I realized everyone was a victim. There are one billion or more victims. Even those who have become victimizers are victims of Islam too. How could I blame Muslims if they do not know what Islam stands for and honestly, though erroneously, believe that it is a religion of peace?

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "At this time, I entered another stage of my spiritual journey to enlightenment. I became angry. Angry for having believed those lies for so many years, for wasting so many years of my life chasing a wild goose. Angry at my culture for betraying me, for the wrong values it gave me, with my parents for teaching me a lie, with myself for not thinking before, for believing in lies, trusting an impostor, with God for letting me down, for not intervening and stopping the lies that were being disseminated in His name." Almighty Allah(swt) has already stopped the lies that were being made against Him, for example: THERE IS NO GOD - He(swt) revealed His Noble Qur'an, with Signs and Truth. GOD IS UNJUST - He(swt) revealed that He is the Most-Gracious, Most-Merciful. NO LIFE AFTER DEATH - He(swt) revealed that He gave life to all things, and can bring about Death, and can restore the dead beings back to Life. GOD HAS CHILDREN - He(swt) revealed that He is Above what the people falsely attribute to Him, He is without children or parents or advisaries. GOD DOESN'T KNOW - He(swt) revealed that Knowledge of All-Things is in a Clear Book, and nothing is Hidden from Him. GOD IS POWERLESS - He revealed that He is full of Might and Has Power over AllThings. Almighty Allah(swt) is all aware of the claims which the people have put forth against

Him, however, they do nothing but lie and Almighty Allah(swt) is above what they falsely attribute to Him, and He has Eternally answered and provided Guidance to Mankind &Jinns (i.e. the Noble Qur'an) "When I saw pictures of millions of Muslims who, with so much devotion, went to Saudi Arabia, many of them spending their lifes savings to perform hajj, I became angry with the lies these people were brought up with. When I read someone had converted to Islam, something Muslims love to advertise and make a big issue of I became saddened and angry. I was sad for that poor soul and angry with the lies. I was angry with the whole world that tries to protect this lie, defend it, and even abuse you if you raise your voice to try to tell them what you know. It is not just Muslims, but even westerners who do not believe in Islam. Its okay to criticize anything but Islam. What amazed me and made me even angrier was the resistance I faced when I tried to tell others that Islam is not the truth." Ali Sina! We were sad for you, we are sad because you are SADistic in all of yoru approaches. Your not advancing in your argument toward Islam, rather your deifying immorality and turning belief in Almighty Allah(swt) into a career choice. You were amazed at the resistance of others? When you openly lie and fabricate, and deceive people, then of course they will be resistant. "Fortunately this anger did not last long. I knew that Muhammad was no messenger of God but a charlatan, a demagogue whose only intention was to beguile people and satisfy his own narcissistic ambitions. I knew all those childish stories of a hell with scorching fire and a heaven with rivers of wine, milk and honey. orgies, were the figments of a sick, wild, insecure and bullying mind of a man in desperate need to dominate and affirm his own authority. I realized I could not be angry with my parents; for they did their best and taught me what they thought to be the best. I could not be angry with my society or culture because my people were just as misinformed as my parents and myself. Afer some thought, I realized everyone was a victim. There are one billion or more victims. Even those who have become victimizers are victims of Islam too. How could I blame Muslims if they do not know what Islam stands for and honestly, though erroneously, believe that it is a religion of peace?" Your a very, enthustiastic fool. The claims which you accuse Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) of, was never instituted by any of his enemies in his entire time on earth. In fact, the contrary is true. (Please Visit our articles dealing with Prophet Muhammad salalahu alayhi wasalaam and his noble character, for more information) *The Nobility of Muhammad(saaw) -A Righteous Man in The Enemies Eyes Also, Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was not dominating anyone by his own authority, rather he was dominating the disbelieving, immoral pagan world, with the Deen Al-Haqq, (the Way/Religion of Truth).

ATTENTION READERS: Isn't it just suprising to the logical mind, how some one such as Ali Sina who is devoid of knowledge, scriptually dishonest, intellectually bankrupt and foolishly lost in Air Castle, could imply that he has some 'KEEN KNOWLEDGE' of Islam (even after lying and being refuted on every allegation) more than the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam), the Sahabah (companions), the Tabien (rightly guided) and the later Scholars of Islam? (continue reading below)

Ali Sina said;

Muhammad the narcissist What about Muhammad? Should I be angry with him for lying, deceiving and misleading people? How could I be angry with a dead person? Muhammad was an emotionally sick man who was not in control of himself. He grew up as an orphan in the care of five different foster parents before he reached the age of eight. As soon as he became attached to someone, he was snatched away and given to someone else. This must have been hard on him and was detrimental to his emotional health. As a child, deprived of love and a sense of belonging, he grew with deep feelings of fear and lack of self-confidence. He became a narcissist. A narcissist is a person who has not received enough love in his childhood, who is incapable of loving, but instead craves attention, respect and recognition. He sees his own worth in the way others view him. Without that recognition he is nobody. He becomes manipulative and a pathetic liar. Narcissists are grandiose dreamers. They want to conquer the world and dominate everyone. Only in their megalomaniac reveries is their narcissism satisfied. Some famous narcissists are Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Pol Pot and Mao. Narcissists are intelligent, yet emotional wrecks. They are deeply disturbed people. They set themselves extremely high goals. Their goals always have to do with domination, power and respect. They are nobody if they are neglected. Narcissists often seek alibis to impose their control over their unwary victims. For Hitler it was the party and race, for Mussolini it was fascism or the unity of the nation against others and for Muhammad it was religion. These causes are just tools in their quest for power. Instead of promoting themselves, the narcissists promote a cause, an ideology, or a religion while presenting themselves as the only authority and the representative of these causes. Hitler did not call the Germans to love him as a person but to love and respect him because he was the Fuhrer. Muhammad could not ask anyone to obey him. But he could easily demand his followers to obey Allah and his messenger. Of course Allah was Muhammads own alter ego, so all the obedience was for him in the final account. In this way he could wield control over everyone's life by telling them he is the representative of God and what he says is what God has ordained. Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited explains:

Everyone is a narcissist, to varying degrees. Narcissism is a healthy phenomenon. It helps survival. The difference between healthy and pathological narcissism is, indeed, in measure. Pathological narcissism and its extreme form, NPD (Narcissistic Pathological Disorder), is characterized by extreme lack of empathy. The narcissist regards and treats other people as objects to be exploited. He uses them to obtain narcissistic supply. He believes that he is entitled to special treatment because he harbours these grandiose fantasies about himself. The narcissist is NOT self-aware. His cognition and emotions are distorted. The above perfectly describes Muhammad. Muhammad was a ruthless man with no feelings. When he decided the Jews were of no use to him, he stopped kowtowing to them and eliminated them all. He massacred all the men of Bani Qurayza and banished or murdered every other Jew and Christian from Arabia. Surely if God wanted to destroy these people he would not have needed the help of his messenger. So I found there was no reason to be angry with an emotionally sick man who died a long time ago. Muhammad was a victim himself of the stupid culture of his people, of the ignorance of his mother who, instead of keeping him during the first years of his life when he needed her love most, entrusted him to a Bedouin woman to raise him so she could find a new husband. Muhammad was a man with profound emotional scars. Dr. Vaknin writes that a narcissist "lies to himself and to others, projecting untouchability, emotional immunity, and invincibility. For a narcissist "everything is bigger than life. If he is polite, then he is aggressively so. His promises outlandish, his criticisms violent and ominous, his generosity inane." Isn't this the image the Prophet projected of himself? I could not criticize or blame the ignorant Arabs of the 7th century for not being able to discern that Muhammad was sick and not a prophet, that his outlandish promises, his impressive dreams of conquering and subduing the great nations when he was just a pauper, were caused by his pathological emotional complications and were not due to a divine power. How could I blame those ignorant Arabs for falling prey to a man like Muhammad when only in the last century, millions of Germans fell prey to the charisma of another narcissist who just as Muhammad, made big promises, was as ruthless, as manipulative, and as ambitious as he was? After serious thought, I realized there is not a single person I could be angry with. I realized we are all victims and victimizers at the same time. The culprit is ignorance. Because of our ignorance we believe in charlatans and their lies, allowing them to disseminate hate among us in the name of false deities, ideologies or religions. This hate separates us from each other, and prevents us from seeing our oneness and understanding that we are all members of the human race, related to each other and interdependent. It was then that my anger gave way to a profound feeling of empathy, compassion and love. I made a promise to myself to fight this ignorance that divides the human race. We paid, and are paying, dearly for our disunity. This disunity is caused by ignorance and the ignorance is the result of false beliefs and pernicious ideologies that are concocted by emotionally unhealthy individuals for self-serving purposes. Ideologies separate us. Religions cause disunity, hate,fighting, killing, and antagonism. As members of the human race, we need no ideology, cause, or religion to be united. I realized that the purpose of life is not to believe but to doubt. I realized that no one can teach us the truth because truth cannot be taught. It can only be experienced. In reality,

no religion, philosophy or doctrine can teach you the truth. Truth is in the love we have for our fellow human beings, in the laugher of a child, in friendship, in companionship, in the love of a parent and a child, and in our relationships with others. Truth is not in ideologies. The only thing that is real, is love.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "What about Muhammad? Should I be angry with him for lying, deceiving and misleading people? How could I be angry with a dead person? Muhammad was an emotionally sick man who was not in control of himself. He grew up as an orphan in the care of five different foster parents before he reached the age of eight. As soon as he became attached to someone, he was snatched away and given to someone else. This must have been hard on him and was detrimental to his emotional health. As a child, deprived of love and a sense of belonging, he grew with deep feelings of fear and lack of self-confidence. He became a narcissist. A narcissist is a person who has not received enough love in his childhood, who is incapable of loving, but instead craves attention, respect and recognition. He sees his own worth in the way others view him. Without that recognition he is nobody. He becomes manipulative and a pathetic liar." Ali Sina has had an epic fail in proving his previous allegations, and now at the end of his rope has decided to psycho analyze the beloved Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam). He believes that because Muhammad(saaw) lost his father while his mother was still pregnant with him and his mother shortly after he turned 6 years of age, that this is a determining factor of [not only a person, but a prophet of Almighty Allah(swt)] the emotional stability of a person. Furthermore, any evidence which Ali Sina would seek to provide from either Sociologist or Psychologist to further press his allgeations against Muhammad(saaw), it will only be to his loss. Despite the expertise of any person(s) in that particular field, that still doesn't validate the assertion that Muhammad(saaw) was emotionally depressed or unstable, or that he lacked self-confidence. We challenge Ali Sina to produce a single authentic Hadith narrations which states that Prophet Muhammad(salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was depressed or lacked self-confidence because he lost his parents or was an orphan? In fact the opposite is true, Almighty Allah(swt) was the one who was there to care for His beloved Prophet and Messenger. We know this from the Noble Qur'an in the following passages, (see below) 1. By the Glorious Morning Light, 2. And by the Night when it is still, 3. Thy Guardian-Lord hath not forsaken thee, nor is He displeased. 4. And verily the Hereafter will be better for thee than the present.

5. And soon will thy Guardian-Lord give thee (that wherewith) thou shalt be wellpleased. 6. Did He not find thee an orphan and give thee shelter (and care)? 7. And He found thee wandering, and He gave thee guidance. 8. And He found thee in need, and made thee independent. 9. Therefore, treat not the orphan with harshness, 10. Nor repulse the petitioner (unheard); 11. But the bounty of the Lord - rehearse and proclaim! (Surah Ad-Duha 93:1-10/ Yusuf Ali Translation) Renowned Muslim commentator, Ibn Kathir exegetes these passages and explains away the falsehoods of Ali Sina. (see below)

Tafsir Ibn Kathir

A Mention of some of Allah's Favors upon the Messenger Enumerating His Favours upon His Messenger, Muhammad Allah says; Did He not find you an orphan and gave you a refuge? This refers to the fact that - his father died while his mother was still pregnant with him, - and his mother, Aminah bint Wahb died when he was only six years old. - After this he was under the guardianship of his grandfather, Abdul-Muttalib, until he died when Muhammad was eight years old. - Then his uncle, Abu Talib took responsibility for him and continued to protect him, assist him, elevate his status, honor him, and even restrain his people from harming him. When he was forty years of age and Allah commissioned him with the Prophethood. Even with this, Abu Talib continued to follow the religion of his people, worshipping idols. All of this took place by the divine decree of Allah and His decree is most excellent. Until Abu Talib died a short time before the Hijrah. After this (Abu Talib's death) the foolish and ignorant people of the Quraysh began to attack him, so Allah chose for him to migrate away from them to the city of Al-Aws and Al-Khazraj among those who helped him (in Al-Madinah). Allah caused his Sunnah to be spread in the most perfect and complete manner. Then, when he arrived at their city, they gave him shelter, supported him, defended him and fought before him (against the enemies of Islam) -- may Allah be pleased with all of them. All of this was from Allah's protection for him, guarding over him and caring for him. Then Allah says,

 He found you unaware and guided you. This is similar to Allah's saying, And thus We have sent to you a Ruh from Our command. you knew not what is the Book, nor what is Faith. But We have made it a light wherewith We guide whosoever of our servants We will... (42:52) Allah says, And He found you poor and made you rich. meaning, `you were poor having dependents, so Allah made you wealthy and independent of all others besides Him.' Thus, Allah combined for him the two positions: - the one who is poor and patient, - and the one who is wealthy and thankful. In the Two Sahihs it has been recorded from Abu Hurayrah that the Messenger of Allah said, "Wealth is not determined by abundance of possessions, but wealth is the richness of the soul." In Sahih Muslim, it is recorded from Abdullah bin Amr that the Messenger of Allah said, "Whoever accepts Islam, is provided with his basic needs, and Allah makes him content with what He has given him, then he will be successful." From the above mentioned Hadith, we learn that Almighty Allah(swt) comforted and took excellent care of our beloved Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) therefore, making him not in need of anyone, and prior to his prophethood, he was being nurtured and taken care of by his uncle 'Abu Talib ibn Abd'allah Muttalib'. This information alone, is enough to debunk the fallacious accusations of narcissism against the noble Prophet(saaw), by the viscious treacherous Ali Sina. "Narcissists are grandiose dreamers. They want to conquer the world and dominate everyone. Only in their megalomaniac reveries is their narcissism satisfied. Some famous narcissists are Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Pol Pot and Mao. Narcissists are intelligent, yet emotional wrecks. They are deeply disturbed people. They set themselves extremely high goals. Their goals always have to do with domination, power and respect. They are nobody if they are neglected. Narcissists often

seek alibis to impose their control over their unwary victims. For Hitler it was the party and race, for Mussolini it was fascism or the unity of the nation against others and for Muhammad it was religion. These causes are just tools in their quest for power. Instead of promoting themselves, the narcissists promote a cause, an ideology, or a religion while presenting themselves as the only authority and the representative of these causes. Hitler did not call the Germans to love him as a person but to love and respect him because he was the Fuhrer. Muhammad could not ask anyone to obey him. But he could easily demand his followers to obey Allah and his messenger. Of course Allah was Muhammads own alter ego, so all the obedience was for him in the final account. In this way he could wield control over everyone's life by telling them he is the representative of God and what he says is what God has ordained." Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) had the same task presented before all the noble prophets of Almighty Allah(swt), [Abraham, Moses, Jesus, Jacob, Isaac, Ishmael, Noah, John,etc] may Peace and Blessing be upon them all. Will Ali Sina also accuse these righteous men of being narcissists? Of course he wouldn't because such a declaration wouldn't support his anti-Islamic propaganda. Also, Ali Sina states that Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) needed to command the people to obey him and Almighty Allah(swt) in order to fulfill his agenda. However, if the pagan people of Mecca rejected his claim to prophethood, why would they then believe his claims if if they already reject the one who the Prophet(saaw) said that Almighty God has sent [i.e. himself]? Ali Sina, where is your reasoning? If Ali Sina suggest that the Prophet(saaw) simply wanted control over HIS OWN FOLLOWERS so he used this term Obey Allah and His Messenger to gain victory over them. Ali Sina overlooks the mission of the prophets. Their objective is to vocalize the message of Almighty Allah(swt) to the people and help them be guided into the path of righteousness, it has nothing to do with world domination. The life of the Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) buries this sick idea that Ali Sina is backing. Him sleeping on a thin bed, his diet consisted of dates and water, he never liked to leave money in his house (due to his frequent giving of charity) he never spoke an ill word toward his friends or foes, he had 2 garments which he wore, he always smiled at the people etc [the list goes on and on] Does this sound like the qualities of a Tyranical Narcissist? Which ruler in history conquered the world with a mirrored lifestyle? Who can live this lifestyle consistently for 23 years with an alternative agenda? Ali Sina is just a distinguished liar and hate mongering, knuckle dragging savage with no sense of direction, lacking all honest effort. He would rather lie against an innocent man, then protray his qualities which were recognized by his Companions and enemies. "Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of Malignant Self Love - Narcissism Revisited explains: Everyone is a narcissist, to varying degrees. Narcissism is a healthy phenomenon. It

helps survival. The difference between healthy and pathological narcissism is, indeed, in measure. Pathological narcissism and its extreme form, NPD (Narcissistic Pathological Disorder), is characterized by extreme lack of empathy. The narcissist regards and treats other people as objects to be exploited. He uses them to obtain narcissistic supply. He believes that he is entitled to special treatment because he harbours these grandiose fantasies about himself. The narcissist is NOT self-aware. His cognition and emotions are distorted." "The above perfectly describes Muhammad. Muhammad was a ruthless man with no feelings. When he decided the Jews were of no use to him, he stopped kowtowing to them and eliminated them all. He massacred all the men of Bani Qurayza and banished or murdered every other Jew and Christian from Arabia. Surely if God wanted to destroy these people he would not have needed the help of his messenger." We addressed these allegations of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) being a murderer and the mention of Banu Qurayza who treacherously killed the allies of Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) and in doing so, invalidating their 10 year peace treaty after only 6 years. Ali Sina is just spouting his reckless nonsense again. We also addressed the might of Almighty Allah(swt) and his full capability of destroying a people or nation. So I found there was no reason to be angry with an emotionally sick man who died a long time ago. Muhammad was a victim himself of the stupid culture of his people, of the ignorance of his mother who, instead of keeping him during the first years of his life when he needed her love most, entrusted him to a Bedouin woman to raise him so she could find a new husband. Muhammad was a man with profound emotional scars. Dr. Vaknin writes that a narcissist "lies to himself and to others, projecting untouchability, emotional immunity, and invincibility. For a narcissist "everything is bigger than life. If he is polite, then he is aggressively so. His promises outlandish, his criticisms violent and ominous, his generosity inane." Isn't this the image the Prophet projected of himself? " Notice what he said; "Muhammad was a victim himself of the stupid culture of his people, of the ignorance of his mother who, instead of keeping him during the first years of his life when he needed her love most, entrusted him to a Bedouin woman to raise him so she could find a new husband. Muhammad was a man with profound emotional scars." How is it that he is a vicitim of his culture? That would assume that his culture had narcissistic agenda's of world domination such as he did, that would also imply that they all claimed prophethood seeking power and control over the people. Ali Sina overlooks the historical fact, that the Arabs of Mecca were desert men of trade and business, if there was any gain for power, it would be through profiteering of their goods. We challenge Ali Sina to produce a single authentic account that states that the Pagans of Mecca claimed prophethood or to be messenger of Almighty God. Also, as we proved earlier, Muhammad(saaw) was not emotionally scared (there is no

evidence supporting this), he was comforted by His Guardian Lord, Almighty Allah(swt) and was not in the need of desiring to control the world. Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was balanced in everything he did, even his physical stature was average and not extreme in any manner. His hair was not too long or too short, but just reached the ear lobes and his shoulders. He was neither too short or too tall, but he was medium height. He was neither too dark, nor too light, but of a wheatish complexion. He spoke neither too fast, neither too slow, but just enough for people to comprehend every word that left his mouth. He even commanded and instructed the Muslims not to be extreme in our religion, (see below) Belief Bukhari :: Book 1 :: Volume 2 :: Hadith 38 Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "Religion is very easy and whoever overburdens himself in his religion will not be able to continue in that way. So you should not be extremists, but try to be near to perfection and receive the good tidings that you will be rewarded; and gain strength by worshipping in the mornings, the nights." (See Fath-ul-Bari, Page 102, Vol 1). Again! When we review the evidence, we see that ALL of the LIES and DECEPTIVE claims of Ali Sina vanish. This deceptive creature is incapable of being honest and true. He will lie even if it be 100% against his own soul. "I could not criticize or blame the ignorant Arabs of the 7th century for not being able to discern that Muhammad was sick and not a prophet, that his outlandish promises, his impressive dreams of conquering and subduing the great nations when he was just a pauper, were caused by his pathological emotional complications and were not due to a divine power. How could I blame those ignorant Arabs for falling prey to a man like Muhammad when only in the last century, millions of Germans fell prey to the charisma of another narcissist who just as Muhammad, made big promises, was as ruthless, as manipulative, and as ambitious as he was? " "After serious thought, I realized there is not a single person I could be angry with. I realized we are all victims and victimizers at the same time. The culprit is ignorance. Because of our ignorance we believe in charlatans and their lies, allowing them to disseminate hate among us in the name of false deities, ideologies or religions. This hate separates us from each other, and prevents us from seeing our oneness and understanding that we are all members of the human race, related to each other and interdependent." Ali Sina has yet again overlooked the mercy of Islam which Prophet Muhamamd (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) has instructed that we Muslims have against Mankind. (see below)

Oneness, Uniqueness of Allah (Tawheed) Bukhari :: Book 9 :: Volume 93 :: Hadith 473 Narrated Jarir bin 'Abdullah: Allah's Apostle said, "Allah will not be merciful to those who are not merciful to mankind." Hey Ali Sina! Would Hitler tell his followers that He will not be merciful to those (among the Nazi's) who are not merciful to mankind (including the jews) we think not? What about the others, Mao Tse Tsung, Mussolini etc? we think not? Therefore, it is perverted and unjust of youto equate these tyranical murderers with the beloved Prophet Muhammad (Salalahu alayhi wasalaam), stop being a deceptive beast and admit that you have been debunked by Islam. "It was then that my anger gave way to a profound feeling of empathy, compassion and love. I made a promise to myself to fight this ignorance that divides the human race. We paid, and are paying, dearly for our disunity. This disunity is caused by ignorance and the ignorance is the result of false beliefs and pernicious ideologies that are concocted by emotionally unhealthy individuals for self-serving purposes." "Ideologies separate us. Religions cause disunity, hate,fighting, killing, and antagonism. As members of the human race, we need no ideology, cause, or religion to be united. I realized that the purpose of life is not to believe but to doubt. I realized that no one can teach us the truth because truth cannot be taught. It can only be experienced. In reality, no religion, philosophy or doctrine can teach you the truth. Truth is in the love we have for our fellow human beings, in the laugher of a child, in friendship, in companionship, in the love of a parent and a child, and in our relationships with others. Truth is not in ideologies. The only thing that is real, is love." Isn't this disturbing? the lack of historical accuracy displayed by Ali Sina. He claims that religions cause disunity, hate, fighting, killing and antagonism. To the contrary, thats exactly the reason that prophets and messengers were sent to their respective tribes and nations (with the exception of Muhammad[saaw] being sent to the whole of mankind). Prime Example(s): Moses(alayhi salaam) was sent to Fir'aun (Pharoah) because of his 'FAITH FREEDOM' and enslaving the Children of Israel and claiming that he was God himself and had full authority over the earth. Moses(alayhi salaam) was sent to free the Children of Israel from the tyranny, oppression, ridicule and disunity that Pharoah and his host had put them through. He then was given the Law and Commandments to orchestrate true worship of the One true God, and to instruct the people on righteous living. Jesus(alayhi salaam) was sent to the Children of Israel to bring them back to true faith in

Almighty Allah(swt) and to leave their hypocritical ways. They were killing the prophets (murder), engaging in riba 'usury' (interest), lying, stealing and disobeying all of the commands revealed to and for them in the Old Testament because of their 'FAITH FREEDOM'. Jesus(alayhi salaam) was given the Gospel, which was a guiding light to bring those with hardened hearts (i.e. the Children of Israel) and lighten the load of the Law also providing guidance to worshiping the One true God, and to instruct the people in a righteous living. Lut(alayhi salaam) was sent to his people to bring them to faith in the One true God and to discard their sexually perverted practices of sodomy and lusting after males in place of women. These people threatened to throw Lut from the land because 'he desired to be pure'. Therefore Almighty Allah(swt), destroyed them, because they disobeyed His calling and chased after their 'FAITH FREEDOM'. Prophet Muhammad (salalahu alayhi wasalaam) was sent to his people because the Pagan Meccans were worshiping over 360 idols in the Kabbah. They were consuming alcohol, raping women and burying newborn daughters alive. They were engaging in interest, they were mistreating the orphans and mistreating slaves, stealing and gambling So Almighty Allah(swt) sent Muhammad[saaw] with the Noble Qur'an to abolish their false idols and 'FAITH FREEDOM' and to guide them to the path of piety and righteouness. [NOTE: America is supposed to be one of the most advanced countries in the world, and this is the same place that has roughly 48,467 liquor stores in the United States. http://www.manta.com/mb_34_B6399_000/liquor_stores Americans spend $166 Billion dollars a year on alcoholic beverages. $157 Billion Dollars on Cigarettes $40 Billion Dollars on Gambling http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/Forbes/The5MostExpensiveAddictions.as px We won't even mention the amount of prostitution, drug sales, murder, rape, stealing, and paganism that goes on in this country. This is the lifestyle that Ali Sina adheres to, this is his deity. The blinding everlasting truth of the matter is, despite what Ali Sina claims, FAITH FREEDOM is not the source of peace and happiness, rather IT IS and has ALWAYS BEEN a direct means of misguidance and destruction. Islam can cure all societal, personal, and religious fallacies that exist, its ignorant godless animals such as Ali Sina that seek to pull intelligent thought away from the Muslims but will always fail epically in his attempt. (PLEASE CONTINUE READING BELOW)

ALI SINA's CONCLUSION

Synthesis The process of going from faith to enlightenment is an arduous and painful process. Let us borrow a term from Sufism and call that the seven valleys of enlightenment. Faith is the state of being confirmed in ignorance. You will continue to stay in that state of blissful ignorance until you are shocked and forced out of it. This shock is the first valley. The natural first reaction to shock is denial. Denial acts like a shield. It buffers the pain and protects you from the agony of going out of your comfort zone. The comfort zone is where we feel at ease, where we find everything familiar, where we don't face new challenges or the unknown. This is the second valley. Growth doesnt take place in comfort zones. In order to go forward and evolve we need to get out of our comfort zones. We won't do that unless we are shocked. It is also natural to buffer the pain of shock by denial. At this moment we need another shock, and we may decide to shield ourselves again with another denial. The more a person is exposed to facts and the more he is shocked, the more he tries to protect himself with more denials. But denials do not eliminate the facts. They just shield us momentarily. When we are exposed to facts, at a certain point we will be unable to continue denying. Suddenly we wont be able to keep our defenses up and the wall of denials will come down. We cant keep hiding our heads in the sand prepetually. Once doubt sets in, it will have a domino effect and we find ourselves hit from all directions by facts that up until now we avoided and denied. Suddenly all those absurdities that we accepted and even defended, are no longer logical and we reject them. We are then driven into the painful stage of confusion and that is the third valley. The old beliefs seem unreasonable, foolish and unacceptable, yet we have nothing to cling to. This valley, I believe, is the most dreadful stage in the passage from faith to enlightenment. In this valley we lose our faith without having found the enlightenment. We are basically standing in nowhere. We experience a free fall. We ask for help but all we get is a rehashing of some nonsense clichs. It seems that those who try to help us are lost themselves, yet they are so convinced. They believe in what they don't know. The arguments they present are not logical at all. They expect us to believe without questioning. They bring the example of the faith of others. But the intensity of the faith of other people does not prove the truth of what they believe in. This confusion eventually gives way to the fourth valley, guilt. You feel guilty for thinking. You feel guilty for doubting, for questioning, for not understanding. You feel naked, and ashamed of your thoughts. You think it is your fault if the absurdities mentioned in your holy books make no sense to you. You think that God has abandoned you or that he is testing your faith. In this valley you are torn apart by your emotions and your intellect. Emotions are not rational, but they are extremely powerful. You want to go back to the paradise of ignorance, you desperately want to believe but you simply can't. You have committed the sin of thinking. You have eaten the forbidden fruit from

the tree of knowledge. You have angered the god of your imaginations. Finally you decide there is no need to feel guilty for the understanding. That guilt does not belong to you. You feel liberated but at the same time dismayed for all those lies that kept you in ignorance and the time wasted. This is the valley of disillusionment. At the same time you are overtaken by sadness. You feel liberated; yet like coming out of prison after spending a lifetime there, you are overtaken by deep sense of depression. You feel lonely and despite your freedom, you miss something. You ponder the time lost. You think of the many people who believe(d) in this nonsense and foolishly sacrifice(d) everything for it, including their lives. The pages of history are written with the blood of people who were killed in the name of Yahweh, Allah or other gods. All for nothing! All for a lie! Thereupon you enter the sixth valley, of anger. You become angry at yourself, and at everything else. You realize how much of your precious life you lost believing in so many lies. But then you realize you are the lucky one for having made it this far and that there are billions of others who are still trying to shield themselves with denials and not venture out of their comfort zone. They are still wading in the quagmire of the first valley. At this stage, when you are completely free from faith, guilt and anger, you are ready to understand the ultimate truth and unravel the mysteries of life. You are filled with empathy and compassion. You are ready to be enlightened. The enlightenment comes when you realize that the truth is in love and in our relationship with our fellow human beings and not in a religion or a cult. You realize that Truth is a pathless land. No prophet or guru can take you there. You are there already. In this odyssey you are not alone. You have a nagging companion who will not leave you. He will try to hinder your advancement and stop you from going forwards. He is your fear: the fear of punishment, of hell, of after death. It is completely irrational, yet it controls you and acts on your subconscious mind every step of the way. The passage from faith to enlightenment is arduous and you will not be able to take the first step if you cannot get rid of your fears. You will only get rid of them completely when you arrive at your destiny and you are enlightened. Then you break the chain of fear and acquire wings of enlightenment. This is the true liberation.

World Islamic Organization (RESPONSE)

He said; "The process of going from faith to enlightenment is an arduous and painful process. Let us borrow a term from Sufism and call that the seven valleys of enlightenment. Faith is the state of being confirmed in ignorance. You will continue to stay in that state of blissful ignorance until you are shocked and forced out of it. This shock is the first valley. The natural first reaction to shock is denial. Denial acts like a shield. It buffers the pain and protects you from the agony of going out of your comfort zone. The comfort zone is where we feel at ease, where we find everything familiar, where we don't face new

challenges or the unknown. This is the second valley." The first valley is realizing that you (Ali Sina) were never a Muslim, and even toward the end of your ignorant demise you still seek to mislead your viewers by consciously lying just to attain soldification for your magical agenda. A Muslim is contented with Almighty Allah(swt) as He encourages us to faith in Him, through being 'Men of Understanding' and He wishes that we 'Ponder deeply over the verses of the Qur'an' while consistently 'Seeing, Hearing, seeking knowledge and traveling the world to see what was end of those who reject truth'. Ali Sina is terribly lost in utter darkness. Almighty Allah(swt) encourages man to appeal to reason and higher intellect in order to acquire faith in Him and the message and instruction of the Qur'an. For this reason, He(swt) states the following; 269. He granteth wisdom to whom He pleaseth; and he to whom wisdom is granted receiveth indeed a benefit overflowing; but none will grasp the Message but men of understanding. "Growth doesnt take place in comfort zones. In order to go forward and evolve we need to get out of our comfort zones. We won't do that unless we are shocked. It is also natural to buffer the pain of shock by denial. At this moment we need another shock, and we may decide to shield ourselves again with another denial. The more a person is exposed to facts and the more he is shocked, the more he tries to protect himself with more denials. But denials do not eliminate the facts. They just shield us momentarily. When we are exposed to facts, at a certain point we will be unable to continue denying. Suddenly we wont be able to keep our defenses up and the wall of denials will come down. We cant keep hiding our heads in the sand prepetually. Once doubt sets in, it will have a domino effect and we find ourselves hit from all directions by facts that up until now we avoided and denied. Suddenly all those absurdities that we accepted and even defended, are no longer logical and we reject them." We Muslims will remain in our comfort zone, because our zone is a zone of HARD EVIDENCE and complete certainty. Yes Ali Sina! We did get out of our comfort zone, to address, debunk, refute and humilate your ignorance and folly. And we were shocked to realize how the Emperor conducted his 'Air Castle'. "We are then driven into the painful stage of confusion and that is the third valley. The old beliefs seem unreasonable, foolish and unacceptable, yet we have nothing to cling to.This valley, I believe, is the most dreadful stage in the passage from faith to enlightenment. In this valley we lose our faith without having found the enlightenment. We are basically standing in nowhere. We experience a free fall. We ask for help but all we get is a rehashing of some nonsense clichs. It seems that those who try to help us are lost themselves, yet they are so convinced. They believe in what they don't know. The arguments they present are not logical at all. They expect us to believe without questioning. They bring the example of the faith of others. But the intensity of the faith

of other people does not prove the truth of what they believe in." "This confusion eventually gives way to the fourth valley, guilt. You feel guilty for thinking. You feel guilty for doubting, for questioning, for not understanding. You feel naked, and ashamed of your thoughts. You think it is your fault if the absurdities mentioned in your holy books make no sense to you. You think that God has abandoned you or that he is testing your faith. In this valley you are torn apart by your emotions and your intellect. Emotions are not rational, but they are extremely powerful. You want to go back to the paradise of ignorance, you desperately want to believe but you simply can't. You have committed the sin of thinking. You have eaten the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge. You have angered the god of your imaginations." Ignorance, inconsistencies, arrogance, disbelief, shamlessness, bewitchment, folly, logically fallacious, deceptively cunning, ALL of Ali Sina's traits, plus more. Almighty Allah(swt) revealed that He will put those who say they believe to the test, to see if their hearts and intentions are pure and they are true in their statements. (Although Almighty Allah(swt) is Supremely entitled to due as He wills) Here is an example; Say for example your the boss of a company, and you have workers who all claims to strive for you anf your company and that they are there to work for you and will not falter. Then your boss puts your statements to the test and gives you more hours to work, other jobs to complete and teaches you new things, he hopes you will fulfill the task because layoffs are coming next week. After the first week, you begin to question the purpose of your boss giving you more hours, giving you other jobs to complete and teaches you new things? Why is he working me so hard? Why do I feel overwhelmed? Will he ever lighten the load? Then your boss informs you that because of your hard work, you will be paid more money, work less days and won't be layed off. Whereas those who refused to work the longer hours, complete other jobs and learn new things, therefore, they get layoff for not fulfilling their oaths and statements. Similarly, Almighty Allah(swt) has taken the oaths of the Muslims that they 'Believe in Him as God Alone, and Muhammad(saaw) is His Messenger'. In that oath, they have agreed to follow the Noble Qur'an and example of Muhammad(saaw). The Muslims have declared, "We believe, and will submit to your Will and strive in your cause". He(swt) then gives the Muslims harder situations in life, difficult situations that require patience and humility, and while these tough situations are layed before you, you are still required to fulfill your obligations (prayer, charity, modesty, humility, patience, fasting etc). As to those who push through and seek Almighty Allah(swt)'s help through patience and prayer, they are the successful and get rewarded with more faith and understanding. As to those who are impatient and reject Him and harden their hearts toward patience and prayer, He rejects them and allows for them to stray and they fall into disbelief because they were false in their oaths. "Finally you decide there is no need to feel guilty for the understanding. That guilt does not belong to you. You feel liberated but at the same time dismayed for all those lies that kept you in ignorance and the time wasted. This is the valley of disillusionment. At the same time you are overtaken by sadness. You feel liberated; yet like coming out of

prison after spending a lifetime there, you are overtaken by deep sense of depression. You feel lonely and despite your freedom, you miss something. You ponder the time lost. You think of the many people who believe(d) in this nonsense and foolishly sacrifice(d) everything for it, including their lives. The pages of history are written with the blood of people who were killed in the name of Yahweh, Allah or other gods. All for nothing! All for a lie!" The Truth has been established with complete certainty. The lies and deceptive tactics of Ali Sina have been debunked and answered. Islam is the religion of truth, revealed by the Supreme Creator of all things seen and unseen. He is the One without equals or rivals, He is the one who has complete and full Knowledge over All-Things. He is Almighty Allah(swt) free from what the creatures (shamless beast -Ali Sina) who attribute falsehoods to Him. Praise be to Almighty Allah(swt) who has revealed His final Revelation to His final Prophet and Messenger, Muhammad(saaw). "Thereupon you enter the sixth valley, of anger. You become angry at yourself, and at everything else. You realize how much of your precious life you lost believing in so many lies. But then you realize you are the lucky one for having made it this far and that there are billions of others who are still trying to shield themselves with denials and not venture out of their comfort zone. They are still wading in the quagmire of the first valley. At this stage, when you are completely free from faith, guilt and anger, you are ready to understand the ultimate truth and unravel the mysteries of life. You are filled with empathy and compassion. You are ready to be enlightened. The enlightenment comes when you realize that the truth is in love and in our relationship with our fellow human beings and not in a religion or a cult. You realize that Truth is a pathless land. No prophet or guru can take you there.You are there already." "In this odyssey you are not alone. You have a nagging companion who will not leave you. He will try to hinder your advancement and stop you from going forwards. He is your fear: the fear of punishment, of hell, of after death. It is completely irrational, yet it controls you and acts on your subconscious mind every step of the way. The passage from faith to enlightenment is arduous and you will not be able to take the first step if you cannot get rid of your fears. You will only get rid of them completely when you arrive at your destiny and you are enlightened. Then you break the chain of fear and acquire wings of enlightenment. This is the true liberation." At this time we would like to give Praise and Thanks to Almighty Allah(swt) who has guided His faithful servants to the way of truth and understanding, and has expelled the hypocrites and liars from this beautiful life of Submission. Ali Sina the treacherous beast has been chained to a fence with his limbs bound and tied and is exposed to the world as a deceptive inconsistent nonsensical individual. We have refuted all of his lies concerning his apostasy. He was never a Muslim, he is a lonely man who needed popularity so he sought to join the anti-Islamic propagandist team. The path of enlightment and truth is fulfilled through Islam, when in doubt, ask someone who has more knowledge on Islam. Legitimate knowledge, not fallaciously ramblings of a mad man (i.e. Ali Sina). We would like to finalize this with a statement from Almighty Allah(swt) from the Noble Qur'an (see below)

 81. And say: "Truth has (now) arrived, and falsehood perished: for falsehood is (by its nature) bound to perish." (Surah Al-Isra 17:81/ Yusuf Ali Translation)