Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
T
I
I
I
I
'-... 1
"
/
/ 1
' /\
l __ L __ , I '---_....l
V,
I ' I
I ! I

I.4CW-ISOO-BI X-I04 CW SUPPLY UNITHI)
o
;:

1rlf
A:l
\-- --1
ell-\, -.---- f
i- Y-r
CD
I
, .
';<: . I 8 EL[(+)2. IO)
=-+++---+ J -'. .. .<_ '-.
i
I " \ i
(lYP.)
.. BOB.EL[ (+)9.25]
1 UNDERSLUNG CRANE
"'/ ';
rre:::n3<.sI'1 eJ"ff'gf
CRANE HOOK APPROCH
.. -. -- ..-"'"' --" -
_
.A:
_ SLOPE
___ SLOPE
_ SLOPE
I.4CY/-600-BIX -005
REORCULAnON HEADER
..1--- ---- \..:." --T-.--- -- --- - ---.-- -- --- --- ---- ----- ---- ----- -- ------------ --------- ---- ---- --- ---------;:
.. - "!.. ___ __ ________. 1. ________ _____ ________________ __ _______________ _________ _____________ _____ _____________. ______ __
i
i
I
I

/
/
/ /
-/
-
L FOR FURlHER DETAIL
REF DRAWING NO.
PP 064 1.4 215 I
LE..G.tlU
UNDERGROUND PIPE UNE
CRANE APPROCH
D CONCRETE FLOOR

GRATING

CHEOUERED PLATE
ROlliNG SHUTTER
WALL
BOB BOTTOM OF BEAM
COP
COOLING TOWR VENDOR
TOC TOP OF COLUMN
fGL FINI SH GROUND LEVEL
TOP TOP Of PLATEFORI.4
FFL FINI SH FLOOR LEVEL
t!..Q..I.E:
I. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN 'Mli AND mVATIONS ARE IN METERS EXCEPT OlH[RWISE SPECIFIED.
Z. El. 0.0 CORRESPONDS TO fiNISH FLOOR LEVEL OF POIlU HOUSE BUILDING VoHICH
CORRESPONDS TO (t CD (CHART OAlUM LEVEL)
3. PUMP MINIMUM SUBIAERGENCE IS AS PER PUIAP IAANUFACTURER RECOf.4MENDATION.
4 ALL DIMENSIONS RELATED TO CRANE ARE PRELIMINARY AND SHALL BE UPDATED AFTER
VENDOR INPUTS
5. NO BEAM AT 2.8M LEVEL BE1WEEN GRID 1&2
6. BACK WALL & BOTTOM WALL SPLITTER v"LL BE PROVIDED NEAR EACH PUMP AS PER cm ANALYSIS
REF . DRAWINGS
\. PLOT PLAN : PP 064 M 201 I. REV5
2. CI'/ PUIAP VENDOR DRA1I1NG : PP 064 MV 714. REV.1
3. COOLING AREA LAYOUT PP 064 f.4 215. REV.A
4. TEePRO GA. or STCP LOG GATE FOR COOLING WATER PUMP END DRG. NO. 453-SLG-CI'IPE-2000
5 T[CPRO or COARSE SCREEN FOR COOLING WATER PUMP ENO ORG. NO. 453-CS-CV.l'E-3000
6. TECPRO GA Of FINE SCREEN FOR COOLING WATER PUMP END ORG. NO. 45J-FS-CV;f'E-3000
MEENAKSHI ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED
(HYDERABAD)
GA OF CW
______ _ ________________-L________ _________________________ ________

\ 'PLAN1 NOR1H
lRUE NORIH

_
S
1/\
,- \/
'--- --
T
I I
Vi \
I
\
I I
\
I
I I \
I I
I '"
I
I I
I
I

/
/
/
/
r
I
COASTAL THERMAL POWER PROJECT (2 X 135 MW)
EVONIK ENERGY SERVI CES (I) PVT. LTO.
(NOIDAl
THERMAX LIMITED
POWER DI VISION
SAl CHAMBERS. WAKOEWAOI. PUNE. INOlA
PUMP HOUSE
___________.
S.No. MEPL/Evonik Comments
dated 24.11.09
TL reply dated 26-11-2009 Resolution dtd.
01.12.09
Schedule
Date
Status TL response Evonik Comments
on 07.01.10
TL response Status Evonik Comments
on 03.08.10
Status
1 TL to furnish the
elevation at top of
gantry girder in order
to freeze the CWPH
crane elevation.
Open
2
Clearance between pump
bowl and bottom of sump-
700mm & Clearance between
center of pump and sand
filled portion-1170mm shall
be as per HIS.
We confirm this is as per
HIS & pump vendor
recommendation. Please
refer pump GA from KBL
for reference.
MEPL agreed Closed Closed
Clearance between
pump centre line
and the retension
wall of the sand
filled portion is
not shown in the
drawing, the same
shall be indicated
in the GA.
Incorporated
& Drawing
revised -
Closed
Closed Noted Closed
3 Capacity of EOT crane is
mentioned as 15T where as
it shall be 30/5T as per MEPL
specification. Ref.-Vol-
II,section-9.4,clause-
2.1,point-'a',page no 10 of
67
As per pump manufacturer
maximum maintanace
weight of pump is 11.5 T
and based on that 15 T
EOT capacity is adequate.
Refer KBL drawing for
reference
Thermax agreed
for 25 T crane
Closed
Incorporated &
Drawing revised -
Closed
5T auxiliary hoist
shall also be
provided for the
CWPH EOT crane,
as mentioned in
the Technical
Specification
Agreed, will
incorporated
& Drawing
will revise
accordingly -
Closed
Closed
Auxiliary hoist
capacity is
mentioned as 3T.
Open
4
Arrangement shall be
provided for isolation of
individual cells of CT.Ref:-
Vol-II,section-7.1,clause-
4.1.1, page 16 of 114.
Each cell isolation of
cooling tower is not
possible. We are providing
wall at basin level to isolate
6 cells of each unit.
Open wrt CT
basin
arrangement
12/19/2009 Open
Arrangement of
wall at basin for
pair of cells are
incorporated -
Closed
OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
5 Difference between
minimum submergence level
& maximum water level for
CW pump shall be minimum
2m, In order to increase
cooling water availability in
sump.
As per EVONIK
specification Vol 2 Section
7.1 clause 4.1.1 page 16 ,
requirement of cooling
tower basin is six minutes
which is 4400 m3. With
present configuration the
hold up time between for
CT basin & forebay is more
than 5100 m3. Further 1.3
m level difference is
sufficient between pump
min. submergence & max
water level.
Open 12/20/2009 Open
As per email
dated
23.12.2009,
levels in pump
house are
revised - Closed
OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
6
What is the handling
arrangement for discharge
valves?
The road is near to
discharge valve & the same
can be handled with any
external cranes.
Valves will be
kept in
horizontal
position. In that
case pump
house width will
increase by 5-7
m & green belt
wil be reduce by
5-7 m.MEPL
agreed to
reduce the
b lt
12/21/2009 Open
Drawing revised -
Closed
OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
7 Electrical rooms and toilets
should be shown clearly in
GA. Separate drawing will be
furnished
Separate
drawing will be
furnished
12/22/2009 Open
Drawing will be
submitted -
Open
Drawing
submission is
pending, TL to
submit the
drawing at the
earliest
Drawing is
Submitted to
MEPL-
Closed
Closed Noted Closed
8
Local control panel is not
shown.
There is no local control
panel for CW pumps. These
will be conrolled from DCS
in CCR.
Closed 12/23/2009 Closed Closed OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
9 Outgoing pipes to units are
not marked.Thermax is
requested to show which is
for which unit.
We will incorporate in
revised GA,
TL will show
expansion
bellow
12/24/2009 Open
Drawing revised -
Closed
OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
10
It appears that Pump # 1 is
common for two units.
Discharge valves are not
shown. Pump #1 should have
two discharge valves to allow
operation for respective unit.
Drawing will be clarified in
next revision for two
diacharge valves
TL will revise
this drawing
12/25/2009 Open
Drawing revised -
Closed
OK Closed Closed Noted Closed
11 MEPL/EVONIK having strong
objection regarding the
forebay arrangement w.r.t
uniform flow of water from
Cooling tower to forebay.
TL will review &
revert.
12/26/2009 Open
Flow distribution
is taken care in
the geometry of
forebay & pump
sump - Closed
TL has agreed to
conduct CW Sump
model study (this
shall include part
of the cooling
tower also!) and
that the same shall
be completed
before start of the
construction works
to take care of the
forebay
arrangement.
Hence this point is
closed.
Ok- Closed Closed Noted Closed
12 Closed Closed Noted Closed
Drawing Name:- CW Pump House GA
Drwg. No.: PP 064 M 216 1
Revision no.: 3
Note:- The drawing is reviewed subjected to agreed capacity i.e. cold water basin capacity shall be for 6 hrs of make-up water
requirement. Accordingly the basin capacity shall be 11,100m3 @ 1850m3/h of for both the cooling towers. Assuming Cold Water
Basin size of 108.6*38.3 and considering water level difference of 1.5m from minimum to normal level, the capacity of the basin works
out to 6239m3. This shortfall in capacity shall be made up in the clarified water tank capacity ie the capacity shall be 5000m3+4860m3
=say 10,000m3