Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation Outline
Translating policy directions into value-
added research
Evidence-based policy-making for 1Care 1Care Concept Evidence to support the 1Care blueprint
development
Evidence needs to ensure evidence-based
(NC CR 2 01 1)
In the future with no restructuring of the health system.. In absence of health financing reform, health system likely to become increasingly privatized both in funding and service delivery
20 0 4 20 0 9 2 01 8 GGH E 5 0% 4 5% 35 % Pvt H E 5 0% 5 5% 65 %
Informati c s 7
Center
(H IC),
- P v tO OP 40% 4 7% 8 - P v tO t her 15% 1 7% S our c e: Dr Chri s topher J ames ,W PRO Proj ec ti ons from MN H A data WH O
1Care Concept
1Care is the restructured integrated health system that is responsive and provides choice of quality health care, ensuring universal coverage for the health care needs of the population based on solidarity and equity
1Care Concept
1Care Concept
Features of 1Care
Streamlined MOH focused on governance, stewardship & specific public health services, training & research Autonomous Malaysian Healthcare Delivery System (MHDS)- integrated public & private sector providers. Emphasis on primary health care. Gatekeeper to higher levels of care Publicly managed health fund - combination of general government revenue & social health insurance (SHI), & may be tempered by minimal co-payments at point of seeking care Single payer system, the National Health Financing Authority (NHFA) set-up on a not-for-profit basis under the MOH Government commits to higher levels of spending for healthcare People commit to increased cost sharing through pooling of funds and cross-subsidy
11
13
PH I , 9% 8% Ge n Ta x
Ca n c on ta i n g ro w th of to t al h ea lt h ex pen di tu re b ase d on pu bli c sect or ma na gem ent an d pru den cy Sav in g s ar e more i n p ri va te sp en d i ng
G en Ta x Pu b lic
(20 18)
G en T ax 3 7% 3 4% 16
Impact Analysis
A) Assessing impact on the
General consensus among funders, was favorable Most stakeholders were in favour of the delivery concept
I mp ac t on Med ic al To ur ism
having to pay
17
C o st of I ns tit ut io na l Ch a n ge
1 . Pri m ary H ea lt h Ca re 2 . Sec o nd a ry & T er ti ary C ar e 3 . He al th F i n an ci n g 4 . G o ver na n ce & St ew ard s h ip 5 . L eg is l ati o n, Re g ul ati o n & E nfo r ce men t 6 . Hu m an R es o ur ce 7 . IC T 8 . Pu bl i c He al th 9 . O ral He al th 1 0. Ph ar mac eu ti ca l Se rvi c es 19 Ad d iti o n al gr ou p Stra teg i c Co m mu n ic ati o n 2 0
Evidence needs to ensure evidencebased policies & tracking 1Care targets: monitoring & evaluation
21 22
Sources of data
Pa t ie nt o r or g a nisa t io n l ev el r ese a rc h Care Pr oc ess es D ai g n o sis Th er a p y C linic a l se r vic e s Pr o ce d ur e s Indiv idual : clinical out come 1. Intermedi ate (eg. BP c ontrol ) O ut -p a tie n ts 2. Ul ti mate (eg M ortal i ty, Q O L, R leh tati on) i abi In -p a tie n ts Se rv i ce O utp uts C entr e level per for mance 1. Eff ec ti v enes s 2. Eqty ui 3. Effi c i enc y 4. R esp onsi v enes s
R eso ur ce D isease b urd en in cidence & Input s p revalen ce P ercep tion on Fina n c ig n h ealthcar e system U tilisat ion o n Man p o we r h ealthcar e system ( incl fin ancial Fa cilit ies ar ran gemen t) Dr u g s De vci e s
Using Research Evidence to Improve Health System Performance E.g. from NHS, UK
25
30
W ai ted si x d ays o r m or e
19
Z E I Z UK US E Z UK US O AU C AN FR ER S G NETH NZ SWW NO R S AU S CA N FR NETH N RSW W I GER N S * Bas e: An sw ered ques ti on. 30 Sour ce: 2010 C om monw eal th F und Internati onal H eal th Pol i c y Sur vey i n E l ev en C ountri es .
Sourc e: 20 10 Comm onweal th F und Internati onal H eal th Pol i c y Surv ey inEl
31
to be a high income nation Breakdown walls to improve efficiency & reducing duplication of
33
35