Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I - tell us the
evidence or topic the paragraph is about
MP - tell us 2-3
important points and why they eliminate other suspects
C - summarize the
paragraph and tell us who you think the matching suspect is.
Clarification
CSI Report turned in. Very little vocabulary used in the writing. No paragraphs follow proper format. Report does not follow order of paragraphs provided. No reference to data collected. Little vocabulary used in the writing. Most paragraphs do not follow proper format. Report does not follow order of paragraphs provided. Little reference to data collected. Appropriate vocabulary used, but with some errors. Most paragraphs follow proper paragraph format. Report follows the order of paragraphs provided, with some errors. Some reference to data collected, but with major errors. Appropriate vocabulary used, with few errors. Report follows the order of paragraphs provided, with some errors. Some reference to data collected. Appropriate vocabulary used. Paragraphs follow proper paragraph format. Report follows the order of paragraphs provided. Reference to data collected. Appropriate vocabulary used well. Frequent reference to data collected.
4 5 6
The student communicates scientific information effectively using scientific language correctly. The student presents all the information appropriately using symbolic and/or visual representation accurately according to the task. The student acknowledges sources of information appropriately.
Clarification
CSI Case File turned in. No knowledge of forensic science is shown. No deductive reasoning is used to support Case Report. Some knowledge of forensic science is shown in Case File, but very little is used in writing the Case Report.
1 2 3 4 5
The student explains scientific ideas and concepts and applies scientific understanding to solve problems in familiar situations. The student analyses scientific information by identifying parts, relationships or causes. The student provides an explanation that shows understanding. The student explains scientific ideas and concepts and applies scientific understanding to solve problems in familiar and unfamiliar situations. The student analyses and evaluates scientific information by making scientifically supported judgments about the information, the validity of the ideas or the quality of the work.
Some knowledge of forensic science is shown in Case File, and in writing the Case Report. Some deductive reasoning is used in the Case Report, but does not explain thinking. Some deductive reasoning is used in the Case Report, with thinking explained.
Good knowledge of forensic science is shown in the Case File, and in writing the Case Report. Deductive reasoning is consistently used in the Case Report, but thinking is not always explained clearly. Deductive reasoning is consistently used in the Case Report, and thinking is explained clearly.
Clarification
Missing many parts of the CSI Case File. Makes a conclusion about the suspect.
1 2 3 4 5
Has all the parts of the CSI Case File, but not in order at all. Makes a conclusion about the suspect, based on only a few pieces of evidence.
The student organizes and transforms data into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presents it using appropriate communication modes. The student draws a conclusion consistent with the data.
Case File in order, but missing a few parts. Conclusion is based on the evidence, but may have some errors. Tables and Timeline are messy or incomplete. Conclusion is based on the evidence, but may have some errors. Tables and Timeline are neatly completed, but may have some errors. Conclusion is based on the evidence, and the case is based on the patterns of the data. Tables and Timeline are neatly completed correctly. Conclusion is clearly presented, and is based on the evidence. The case is based on the patterns of the data, and reasons are given why other suspects were not guilty.
The student organizes and transforms data into numerical and diagrammatic forms and presents it logically and clearly, using appropriate communication modes. The student explains trends, patterns or relationships in the data, comments on the reliability of the data, draws a clear conclusion based on the correct interpretation of the data, and explains it using scientific reasoning.
Clarification
Required frequent reminders to work safely. Did not contribute to the team.
1 2 3 4 5 6
The student uses most equipment competently but might require occasional guidance; on most occasions pays attention to safety and works responsibly with the living and non-living environment. The student generally cooperates well with other students. The student works largely independently; uses equipment with precision and skill; pays close attention to safety and deals responsibly with the living and non-living environment. The student consistently works effectively as part of a team, collaborating with others and respecting their views.
Required few reminders to work safely, and use equipment properly. Contributed to the team, but needed reminders about cooperating well with others. Contributed to the team, and cooperated well with others.
Did not require reminders to work safely and use equipment properly.
Was a leader, and able to help others on their team without being asked or forced to do so.