Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10
 
[2001V880] PHILIPPINE LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE COMPANY, INC., petitioner, vs. CITY OF DAVAO and ADELAIDA B. BARCELONA, in her capacity asthe City Treasurer of Davao, respondents.2001 Aug 222nd DivisionG.R. No. 143867D EC I S I O NMENDOZA, J.:This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of CivilProcedure of the resolution,[1] dated June 23, 2000, of the Regional Trial Court, Branch13, Davao City, affirming the tax assessment of petitioner and the denial of its claim for tax refund by the City Treasurer of Davao.The facts are as follows:On January 1999, petitioner Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co., Inc. (PLDT)applied for a Mayor’s Permit to operate its Davao Metro Exchange. Respondent City of Davao withheld action on the application pending payment by petitioner of the localfranchise tax in the amount of P3,681,985.72 for the first to the fourth quarter of 1999.[2]In a letter dated May 31, 1999,[3] petitioner protested the assessment of the localfranchise tax and requested a refund of the franchise tax paid by it for the year 1997 andthe first to the third quarters of 1998. Petitioner contended that it was exempt from the payment of franchise tax based on an opinion of the Bureau of Local GovernmentFinance (BLGF), dated June 2, 1998, which reads as follows:PLDT:Section 12 of RA 7082 provides as follows:"SEC. 12. The grantee, its successors or assigns shall be liable to pay the same taxes ontheir real estate, buildings, and personal property, exclusive of this franchise, as other  persons or corporations are now or hereafter may be required by law to pay. In additionthereto, the grantee, its successors or assigns shall pay a franchise tax equivalent to three percent (3%) of all gross receipts of the telephone or other telecommunications businesses transacted under this franchise by the grantee, its successors or assigns, andthe said percentage shall be in lieu of all taxes on this franchise or earnings thereof . . . "It appears that RA 7082 further amending Act No. 3436 which granted to PLDT afranchise to install, operate and maintain a telephone system throughout the PhilippineIslands was approved on August 3, 1991. Section 12 of said franchise, likewise, containsthe "in lieu of all taxes" proviso.In this connection, Section 23 of RA 7925, quoted hereunder, which was approved onMarch 1, 1995, provides for the equality of treatment in the telecommunications industry:"SEC. 23. Equality of Treatment in the Telecommunications Industry. ¾ Any advantage,favor, privilege, exemption, or immunity granted under existing franchises, or may
 
hereafter be granted, shall ipso facto become part of previously grantedtelecommunications franchises and shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally tothe grantees of such franchises: Provided, however, That the foregoing shall neither applyto nor affect provisions of telecommunications franchises concerning territory covered bythe franchise, the life span of the franchise, or the type of service authorized by thefranchise." ( nderscoring supplied.)On the basis of the aforequoted Section 23 of RA 7925, PLDT as a telecommunicationsfranchise holder becomes automatically covered by the tax exemption provisions of RA7925, which took effect on March 16, 1995.Accordingly, PLDT shall be exempt from the payment of franchise and business taxesimposable by LGUs under Sections 137 and 143 (sic), respectively, of the LGC, upon theeffectivity of RA 7925 on March 16, 1995. However, PLDT shall be liable to pay thefranchise and business taxes on its gross receipts realized from January 1, 1992 up toMarch 15, 1995, during which period PLDT was not enjoying the "most favored clause" proviso of RA 7025 (sic).[4]In a letter dated September 27, 1999, respondent Adelaida B. Barcelona, City Treasurer of Davao, denied the protest and claim for tax refund of petitioner,[5] citing the legalopinion of the City Legal Officer of Davao and Art. 10, §1 of Ordinance No. 230, Seriesof 1991, as amended by Ordinance No. 519, Series of 1992, which provides: Notwithstanding any exemption granted by any law or other special law, there is herebyimposed a tax on businesses enjoying a franchise, at a rate of Seventy-five percent (75%)of one percent (1%) of the gross annual receipts for the preceding calendar year based onthe income or receipts realized within the territorial jurisdiction of Davao City.[6]Petitioner received respondent City Treasurer’s order of denial on October 1, 1999. On November 3, 1999, it filed a petition in the Regional Trial Court of Davao seeking areversal of respondent City Treasurer’s denial of petitioner’s protest and the refund of thefranchise tax paid by it for the year 1998 in the amount of P2,580,829.23. The petitionwas filed pursuant to §§195 and 196 of the Local Government Code (R.A. No. 7160). Noclaim for refund of franchise taxes paid in 1997 was made as the same had already prescribed under §196 of the LGC, which provides that claims for the refund of taxes paid under it must be made within two (2) years from the date of payment of such taxes.[7]The trial court denied petitioner’s appeal and affirmed the City Treasurer’s decision. Itruled that the LGC withdrew all tax exemptions previously enjoyed by all persons andauthorized local government units to impose a tax on businesses enjoying a franchisenotwithstanding the grant of tax exemption to them. The trial court likewise denied petitioner’s claim for exemption under R.A. No. 7925 for the following reasons: (1) it isclear from the wording of §193 of the Local Government Code that Congress did notintend to exempt any franchise holder from the payment of local franchise and businesstaxes; (2) the opinion of the Executive Director of the Bureau of Local Government
 
Finance to the contrary is not binding on respondents; and (3) petitioner failed to presentany proof that Globe and Smart were enjoying local franchise and business taxexemptions.Hence, this petition for review based on the following grounds:I. THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN APPLYING SECTION 137 OF THE LOCALGOVERNMENT CODE, WHICH ALLOWS A CITY TO IMPOSE A FRANCHISETAX, AND SECTION 193 THEREOF, WHICH PROVIDES FOR WITHDRAWAL OFTAX EXEMPTION PRIVILEGES.II. THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN NOT HOLDING THAT UNDER PETITIONER’S FRANCHISE, AS IMPLICITLY AMENDED AND EXPANDED BYSECTION 23 OF REPUBLIC ACT NO. 7925 (PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONSPOLICY ACT), TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE FRANCHISES OF GLOBETELECOM, INC. AND SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC., WHICH WEREENACTED SUBSEQUENT TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE, NOFRANCHISE AND BUSINESS TAXES MAY BE IMPOSED ON PETITIONER BYRESPONDENT CITY.III. THE LOWER COURT ERRED IN NOT GIVING WEIGHT TO THE RULING OFTHE BUREAU OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINANCE THAT PETITIONER ISEXEMPT FROM THE PAYMENT OF FRANCHISE AND BUSINESS TAXES,AMONG OTHERS, IMPOSABLE BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS UNDER THELOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.First. The LGC, which took effect on January 1, 1992, provides:SEC. 137. Franchise Tax. ¾ Notwithstanding any exemption granted by any law or other special law, the province may impose a tax on businesses enjoying a franchise, at a ratenot exceeding fifty percent (50%) of one percent (1%) of the gross annual receipts for the preceding calendar year based on the incoming receipt, or realized, within its territorial jurisdiction.In the case of a newly started business, the tax shall not exceed one-twentieth (1/20) of one percent (1%) of the capital investment. In the succeeding calendar year, regardless of when the business started to operate, the tax shall be based on the gross receipts for the preceding calendar year, or any fraction thereof, as provided herein.[8]SEC. 193. Withdrawal of Tax Exemption Privileges. ¾ Unless otherwise provided in thisCode, tax exemptions or incentives granted to, or presently enjoyed by all persons,whether natural or juridical, including government-owned or -controlled corporations,except local water districts, cooperatives duly registered under R. A. 6938, non-stock andnon-profit hospitals and educational institutions, are hereby withdrawn upon theeffectivity of this Code.

Satisfaites votre curiosité

Tout ce que vous voulez lire.
À tout moment. Partout. Sur n'importe quel appareil.
Aucun engagement. Annulez à tout moment.
576648e32a3d8b82ca71961b7a986505