Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Table Of Contents
Major Rating Factors Rationale Outlook Profile: Focus On Alternative Investments Support And Ownership: FTSE-100 Listing Strategy: Focus On Realizing GLG Revenue Synergies Risk Management: Conservative Management Of Complex Risk Profile Profitability: Positioned For Longer-Term Earnings Growth Finances: Capitalization Weaker Relative To Historical Levels, Although Adequate Related Criteria And Research
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
1
881716 | 301240661
Weaknesses:
Weak gross debt service metrics. Uneven short-term investment performance. Weak net fund flows over the past few quarters, albeit with signs of improvement since the GLG acquisition. More complex risk profile than traditional asset managers.
Rationale
The ratings on Man Group PLC reflect Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' view of its strong market position in the hedge fund industry and long track record. Man's high-fee margins and distribution capabilities are also supportive rating factors in our view. Offsetting these factors are Man's weak gross debt service metrics, patchy investment performance, and the complexity of its risk profile relative to traditional asset managers. We note that prior to the quarter ended March 31, 2011, Man had nine consecutive quarters of net fund outflows. However, we consider that this trend may be reversing with strong net inflows of $3.7 billion for the most recent quarter ended June 30, 2011. In our view, the GLG Partners Inc. (GLG) acquisition (and successful integration) is a net positive for Man's business profile, which we already viewed as relatively strong for the sector. In particular, GLG has broadened Man's product offering and reduced its reliance on in-house investment manager AHL. We note that continued market volatility and macro uncertainty has hindered investment performance with AHL Diversified PLC approximately 12% below peak on a weighted-average basis as at June 30, 2011. Notwithstanding near-term market volatility, however, we view the Man-GLG combination as being well positioned to capitalize on longer-term trends in the hedge fund industry and drive better net sales and improved cash flow. Man continues to have high margins with an average gross management fee margin for the year ended March 31, 2011 of 277 basis points (bps). Although performance fees are important to Man's revenue growth, we note that Man has a solid base of more stable management fee revenue, unlike many hedge fund peers. Man's debt-servicing capacity has been on a declining trend. Adjusted EBITDA (excluding nonrecurring items and performance fees) covered gross interest payable by 5.1x in the year to March 31, 2011, compared with 11x in the prior year. We expect this metric to remain around the 5-6x level in the year ended Dec. 31, 2011 (nine months, annualized. Man is moving to a December 31 financial year-end; as a result, the next reporting period will be nine
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
2
881716 | 301240661
months). Leverage, measured by gross debt to adjusted EBITDA, rose to 3x at March 31, 2010, from 0.8x a year earlier, partly as a result of a shift in Man's funding strategy to diversify funding sources. Leverage as at March 31, 2011 remained high at 3.2x. We see this relatively high level as part mitigated by Man's cash levels. We consider that liquidity will remain sound, reflecting our expectation that its liquidity needs will remain lower than they have been in the past. Although Man's capitalization, as measured by the ratio of total tangible equity (TTE) to AUM, declined from 4.9% at March 31, 2010 to 1.8% as a result of the GLG transaction, we consider it to be adequate and in line with similarly rated asset managers.
Outlook
The stable outlook reflects our expectation that Man's strengthened business profile will lead to a gradual improvement in cash flow and gross leverage metrics while continuing to maintain adequate liquidity and capital. The ratings could be lowered if gross leverage metrics remain at or around their current level. The ratings could also be lowered if we consider that revenue synergies with GLG are not being fully realized or if there is a sustained period of weak investment performance and net redemptions. The ratings could be raised if Man is able to demonstrate a strong and sustained improvement in debt service metrics above the 10x level (as measured by adjusted EBITDA/gross interest expense) and net sales across a broader range of products, geographies, and channels than we currently observe.
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
3
881716 | 301240661
Chart 1
Man's investment content is provided by: AHL ($22.7 billion AUM at March 31, 2011). Prior to the GLG acquisition, this was Man's principal single manager. AHL is a U.K.-based, trend following, managed futures manager, founded in 1987. AHL has a substantially higher volatility/higher return profile than Man's other in-house investment managers. GLG ($32 billion AUM at March 31, 2011). GLG offers a range of alternative investment styles such as macro, emerging markets, and credit. GLG also includes equity long-only products. Man Multi-Manager ($14.4 billion AUM at March 31, 2011). This is Man's multi-manager offering that provides access to the full spectrum of hedge fund investing for both institutional and private investors. It also manages Man's private investor structured products.
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
4
881716 | 301240661
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
5
881716 | 301240661
Chart 2
Risk governance
Man employs a "hub and spokes" approach to risk management. That is, the strong central group risk management function supports the risk management functions in each in-house investment manager. The former's focus is on monitoring and managing groupwide, corporate risks and the latter's is on investment risk, for example, the risks relating to the underlying investment portfolios. While the asset managers effectively operate in silos, coherence in risk management is ensured through subjecting all to the same risk methodology and governance requirements.
Liquidity risk
Man maintains a substantial stock of liquidity because it may choose in certain circumstances to provide financial support to its fund products. Cash and cash equivalents were down from $3,229 billion at March 31, 2010 to $2,359 million at March 31, 2011, as a result of the GLG acquisition. In addition, Man has a $1.56 billion
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
6
881716 | 301240661
committed syndicated facility, undrawn as at end-July 2011. Although cash levels have fallen as a result of the GLG transaction (and other actions such as the recent purchase of Lehman exposures from GLG's Long Short and North American Opportunity funds for $355 million) we consider that Man's liquidity requirements appear lower than previously. Over the past two years Man's financial guarantees and commitments have fallen considerably. Man also models a variety of liquidity stress scenarios, the results of which are being used to determine the quantum of liquid resources required. Man considers that its more dynamic management of AHL's investment exposure with constraints on the amount of cash that can be used for margin trading, along with Man Multi-Managers' greater focus on more liquid managers and styles (with tight constraints on contractual dealing days), reduces its stress liquidity requirement. We expect Man's strategic approach toward liquidity to remain conservative. Table 1 highlights the reduction in Man's total financial guarantees and commitments over the past two years to $1.4 billion from $2.4 billion. The most notable decline has been in respect of some of its legacy structured products for which Man has made a commitment to provide monthly liquidity to investors. The potential impact of these committed purchase agreements (CPAs) will gradually reduce to zero, over time. In practice, Man has not needed to provide short-term bridging finance for these CPAs.
Table 1
Permanent leverage is provided to the fund products directly by a pool of banks, on a nonrecourse basis to the investors and with no guarantee from Man. At March 31, 2011, these borrowings totaled $2.9 billion, with an additional $1 billion available, most of which is used by Man's capital-guaranteed products. Man mitigates the associated refinancing risk through policies on diversification by source and maturity, and by maintaining spare pool capacity.
Credit risk
Man's credit risk exposure arises primarily from its practice of making uncommitted short-term loans to its funds. Loans to funds totaled $551 million at March 31, 2011, up from $373 million in the prior year. This amount, however, can vary considerably during the course of the year. New lending decisions, which follow a full credit assessment of the funds, are subject to a hierarchy of delegated approval levels and internal credit limits, at individual fund levels and in aggregate. Fund performance is monitored daily and a review triggered if the net asset value falls to a predefined multiple of investors' capital. The fund is then put into a degearing process, which reduces
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
7
881716 | 301240661
investment exposure and may ultimately lead to the fund winding down. On the rare occasions where Man aids this process by lending into the fund, its risk is clearly higher than for a performing fund. However, Man's track record is strong in this respect and has never experienced a default.
Market risk
Like any asset manager, Man is exposed to market risk because fee income is dependent on fund performance and AUM. However, the diversity of the underlying hedge fund strategies offer some mitigation. Market risk also arises through Man's proprietary seed investments in its funds ($367 million at March 31, 2011). We are not anticipating significant growth in this portfolio, which remains diversified. Seed investments take two forms--funds placed with early stage hedge fund managers as part of the multi-manager due diligence process, and early stage capital in new products used to establish a track record. Man manages the attendant risk through investment limits (to individual funds and in aggregate), risk limits (principally value-at-risk (VAR) related), and stress testing.
Operational risk
Man pays particularly careful attention to the operational risks associated with product suitability, sales practices at intermediaries, fund administration, and valuations. While intermediaries are always responsible for the client relationship and therefore ensuring suitability, Man vets prospective intermediaries and works closely with them on product documentation and disclosures. Key man risk is not a material factor in most of the in-house investment managers or at group level--they are quite large organizations, with strong management teams and good infrastructure. That said, while Man has been able to retain GLG portfolio managers (PMs) to date, departure of key PMs could adversely affect investment performance and sales. Man is a technology-intensive business at all levels, meaning that technology investment is significant and constant. All key operational hubs are backed up to remote data centers and disaster recovery sites. Business continuity plans are tested regularly.
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
8
881716 | 301240661
Table 2
*FY 2010 GLG alternatives and long only margins based on the period from Oct. 1, 2009-March 31, 2010. Source: Man Group.
Although we expect Man to demonstrate some earnings volatility due to the contribution of performance fees, we note that unlike many hedge fund peers, Man has a solid base of management fee revenue. In the past, performance fees have been substantial. Chart 3 highlights Man's strong historical performance prior to FY10. Reported performance fees for the year ended March 31, 2011 of $203 million was split approximately 50:50 between Man and GLG. We believe GLG performance fees will provide good upside potential going forward as 65% of GLG performance fee eligible funds were above high watermark at March 31, 2011.
Chart 3
Reflective of its business model, Man operates a technology heavy, operationally intensive business model, which results in operating expenses being proportionally higher than at traditional asset managers. In the past Man has
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
9
881716 | 301240661
reacted to changed market conditions by demonstrating variability of costs and initiating cost reduction programs. Man is currently on track to deliver the full $50 million of identified cost synergies from the GLG acquisition by September 2011. Other cost initiatives include outsourcing of shareholder services to an independent administrator, which adds further cost flexibility. We consider that gross interest coverage is weak and will likely be weak for ratings in the current fiscal year (nine months to year-end Dec. 31, 2011). However, in the longer term we expect a gradual improvement in coverage metrics driven by favorable sales impact and improved investment performance (see chart 4).
Chart 4
We exclude one-off gains and losses from EBITDA (see table 3). We also take a conservative approach to interest expense using gross rather than net figures. Our calculation of interest expense includes one-half of the servicing cost of Man's hybrid issue in 2008, in accordance with our criteria (Man treats this as a cost on equity). On this basis, Man's EBITDA was $732 million in the year to March 31, 2011, and EBITDA covered interest expense 7.4x. We place greater analytical emphasis on an adjusted EBITDA measure, which removes the contribution from potentially volatile performance fees. Man's adjusted EBITDA covered interest expense 5.1x in the same period and we expect this metric to remain flat in the current fiscal year (nine months, annualized).
Table 3
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
10
881716 | 301240661
Table 3
*In FY11, FY10 & FY09, differs from reported pretax income due to the hybrid dividend, which is treated by Man as a cost on equity. We add half of this amount to interest expense.
While our rating focus is on cash flow as the primary source of an asset manager's ability to service its obligations, we also focus on TTE regarding a company's ability to absorb unexpected losses. In our view, this is especially relevant in the case of Man, given its risk profile. As at May 31, 2011, Man reported "excess" capital over minimum regulatory requirements of approximately $900 million (down to $850 million following the purchase of frozen Lehman assets). Although this represents a decline
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
11
881716 | 301240661
from historical levels, which has been comfortably over $1 billion in recent years, we consider that Man does not anticipate any strategic use of capital in the near-to-medium term. However, over time, if Man continues to accumulate excess capital, we can envisage a scenario where some of it may be returned to shareholders, while continuing to remain adequately capitalized. Man's gross debt leverage has risen from a low point in early 2008 and remains relatively high even though no new debt has been issued as a result of the GLG transaction. Strategically, Man has sought diversification by source and tier, extending the maturity profile, bolstering liquid assets, and improving the cost efficiency of its capital structure. We expect Man's leverage to remain around the same level during the current fiscal year (nine months) with a gradual decline from 2012 onward.
Chart 5
Our leverage metrics are based on total debt of $1,628 million at March 31, 2011. This comprises reported debt of $1,478 million plus $150 million in relation to Man's $300 million hybrid debt issue. The latter, issued in 2008, is an 11% perpetual subordinated capital security that qualifies as Tier 1 regulatory capital and is convertible into preferred stock. When calculating TTE, our preferred capital measure for asset managers, we classify it as of "intermediate" strength equity content, and include 50% of the principal in TTE. We also note that periodically Man makes use of its syndicated loan facility. Man's 600 million five-year bond issue in February 2010 reflected Man's desire to lengthen and pre-fund its maturity profile in anticipation of likely reduced availability and less favorable terms when refinancing its loan facility.
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
12
881716 | 301240661
Measured by total debt to adjusted EBITDA, gross leverage was relatively high at 3.2x at year-end 2011, up slightly from 3.0x a year earlier.
Table 5
*Differs from reported net income due to the hybrid dividend, which is treated by Man as a cost on equity. One-off gains deducted. Performance fees also deducted. 2006 figures restated. Data prior to 2006 not comparable.
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
13
881716 | 301240661
A-/Stable/A-2
Additional Contact: Financial Institutions Ratings Europe; FIG_Europe@standardandpoors.com Additional Contact: Financial Institutions Ratings Europe; FIG_Europe@standardandpoors.com
Standard & Poors | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | July 28, 2011
14
881716 | 301240661
Copyright 2011 by Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect
15
881716 | 301240661