Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Acknowledgements 1.1 The authors of this report, Dr. Mahaman Hallarou (Relief International) and David C.
Eastman (consultant) would like to thank various contributors who participated in this Knowledge, Practice and Coverage final survey. In particular, thanks are due to the people who supported this survey either through their involvement in its planning and implementation. These include the staff of the Konni District Ministry of Health (MOH), especially medical district coordinator Dr. Alio Tayabou and MOH supervisor Abuzeidi Chahabou; district administrator Suleymane Issaka; health supervisor Abuzeidi Chahabou; Konni Statistics Department supervisor Alio Nahantchi, MPDL Medical Officer Dr. Soumana Oumarou; and LNGO ISCV supervisor Sangar and survey interviewers (listed in Appendix 5); Meredith Chang (USAID-Child Survival and Health Grants Program); and Paulin Ntawangundi (Relief International). 1.2 Thanks are also due to USAIDCSHGP, which funded the implementation of the survey.
1.3 The following people were instrumental in bringing the KPC survey and report preparation to successful completion: 1- CORE TEAM
Num 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Name Salissou Iliassou Abouzeidi Chouhabou Dr Mahaman Hallarou Rakia Azouma Moustapha Tcharimi Remi Sugurono Dr Soumana Oumarou
Structure
Contacts
DDP/AT/DC Konni 96879464 DS Konni RI RI RI Consultant 96878938 96292784 96876643 96883375 90612227
2- SURVEY SUPERVISORS
N d'ordre 1 2 3 4 5
Nom et prnom Ali Hantchi Moussa Maman Tela Ary Issaka Ousmane Mme Garba Nana Haouaou Maman Sani Moussa Oumarou Sangar Rachide Kamay Goga Abouzeidi Chouhabou
Structure DDP/AT/DC Konni ONG ISCV Konni DDJS Jeunesse Sport Konni ONG ISCV Konni ONG ISCV Konni ONG ISCV Konni Alphabtisation DS Konni
Contacts 96 59 07 60 96 87 89 38 98 09 19 04 90790960
6 7 8
9 10
Superviseur Superviseur
90466551 96081133
N d'ordre 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Nom et prnom Ibrahim Gado Abdoulkarim Ado Ibrahim Maman Sani Binta Ibrahim Hassane Almou Amadou
Contacts 98 74 37 40/ 94 99 02 63 96 89 75 48/90 39 32 41 96 46 66 01/90 17 19 68 96 58 72 63/90 20 52 64 90 04 12 63/94 32 35 91 96 21 88 44 96 01 43 04 91 36 34 32 90 57 95 34 96 27 78 38/91 31 00 17 96 58 04 76/90 88 20 37 96 98 08 66 96 89 89 97/90 50 11 84 96 57 44 20 94 25 45 87/97 71 45 33
96467334/90416478
Alzouma Mayaki Oumarou Etudiant Oumarou Djibo M. Salissou Dan Nana Moussa Abdou Bga Alou Enseignant Sociologue/Agent municipal Auxiliaire d'levage Sociologue
Salifou Moumouni Kadidja Sociologue Mohamed Abolbol Aichatou Abdou Garba Alzouma Mahaman Moustapha Arzika Halimatou
Dakaou Alio
Abdou Andin Moussa Jean Traor Fatimatou Issaka Bilali Abdoul Razakou Habou Nagodi Souley Hamidine
91 59 95 35 91 71 50 83 96 26 75 84/90 83 43 76 96 50 40 96 96 40 20 88
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Mato Touraki Mme Maman Fati Idi Oumarou Ibrahim Ali Abdoul Karim Salamatou Habou Garba Kano Ibro Mahamadou
Ibrahim Oumarou
Journaliste Agent du Plan Etudiant DDP/AT/DC Journaliste Radio Anfani Enseignant retrait Animateur
Etudiant
96 75 89 77 98 58 42 66 96 02 76 40 96 29 03 63 96 06 42 47 96 97 29 14 96 07 69 59/94 08 42 34
96 52 95 02/90 25 45 37
Hadiza Ibrahim
97 28 74 80
Table of Contents
Background
1.1 Project Location 1.2 Niger is a landlocked Sahelian country that is ranked third from the last on the 2010
Human Development Index list of 169 countries1, with 69 percent of its population living below the poverty line.2 Like the rest of the Sahel, Niger has a long history of endemic hunger characterized by seasonal fluctuations and geographic variation. 1.3 In 2005, a severe drought resulted in a famine that affected nearly 3 million people and exacerbated the already fragile health and nutritional status of the country with disproportional suffering among women and children. While the current crop harvests have ameliorated some of the immediate concerns, many areas do not have transitional support or programs to ensure adequate coping mechanisms, particularly in the areas targeted by this project. year USAID Funded Child Survival Project in Konni District.
1.4 In 2007, in the aftermath of the Nutritional crisis, Relief International started a four 1.5 The project Intervention Zone is located in the southwestern areat of the Tahoua region
and is 417 kilometers to the east from the capital Niamey covering 5,317 square miles. 1.6
1.7 Characteristics of the Target Population 1.8 At the Project Start up in 2007, The Konni Department has an estimated 428,623
individuals with the following repartition3: 1.9 1.10 Age Group 1.12 0-11 months 1.14 12-59 months 1.16 Pregnant woman 1.18 Woman of reproductive age 1.11 Population 1.13 24,200 1.15 59,124 1.17 20,445 1.19 91,297
1.20 It is fast growing population with 3.3% annual increase4 and in 2011, Konni total
population is estimated at 478687 , 93057 U5 children and 101960 women of reproductive age. Hausa and Peulh are the 2 main ethnic groups.
1.21 Health, Social and Economic Conditions within the Project Area
Class dans les 4 derniers Pays les plus pauvre du monde dans la classification du Program des Nations Unies pour le Development ( PNUD)5, le Niger fait rgulirement face aux contraintes des alas climatiques, et de linstabilit politiques dans un contexte de faible pouvoir dachats avec plus de la moiti de la population vivant avec moins de 1 dollar/Jour. Il rsulte une situation dinscuritaire alimentaire chronique, dans un contexte daccs insuffisant aux soins de sant de base et dhygine prcaire. Malgr ce contexte National, Le departement de Konni est nanmoins un carrefour avec sa situation gographique et la proximit avec le Nigria font de lui une plaque tournante et un carrefour important entre louest (axe Niamey-Konni), le Nord (Agadez-Tahoua), lEst (axe Diffa-Zinder-Maradi) et le Sud (axe Konni-Sokoto au Nigrian). Cette position privilgie lui confere un niveau conomique meilleur que dautres departements avec le commerce frontalier. Le Niveau danalphatisme lve denviron 83%6 de la population pose une limitation a linformation et a la communication dans toutes les interventions au niveau communitaire.
4 http//www.ins.ne 5 http://hdrstats.undp.org/fr/pays/profils/NER.html 6 http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?c=ng&v=39&l=fr 7 RN /Ministere de la SantPublique. Plan de Developpement Sanitaire du Niger adopt Janvier 2011. 8 RN/Ministre de la Sant Publique. Avant-projet de Stratgie National de Survie de lEnfant, 2008 ; page 30. 9 RN/Ministere de la Sant Publique. Plan National pour la Nutrition PNN 2011-2015
The activities for achieving the Strategic Objectives are organized into five Technical Packages/Sub-Objectives: To increase access to, demand for, and use of quality maternal and child health services, including emergency care; in order to improved family behaviors related to maternal and child health. To improve case management of malaria at the community and health post levels; increase access to treatment for malaria; improve access and use of treated mosquito nets; and to improve use of chemoprophylaxis (IPT) for malaria among pregnant women. To improve prevention and treatment of diarrheal disease among rural children under five. Improve nutrition of women and children, through education and household/community food security and nutrition activities. To improve the capacity of the Ministry of Health and local partner agencies, to plan, implement, monitor and evaluate child survival interventions at the community and district levels, with an emphasis on capacity in maternal and child health, nutrition, and household food security.
The Project Targeted Initially 90 villages in 2 phased coverage approach. The project established 266 women care groups and support 50 Health posts. After the MTE, finally limited its intervention area to 61 villages. Baseline KPC and Health Facility Assessment and DIP workshop were performed in January and February 2008. The Project used an adapted version of the care group model and training for health care providers at the facility level that resulted according to the Mid Term Evaluation done in January 2010 in an increased knowledge and practice around key child survival interventions, especially malaria prevention, improved nutrition, control of diarrheal disease, and increased access to essential obstetric and neonatal care. Final KPC was implemented as part of the overall Final Evaluation Process in September.
Percentage of children age 0-23 months with diarrhea in the last two weeks who received oral rehydration solution (ORS) and/or recommended home fluids. Acute Respiratory Infections Percentage of children age 0-23 months with chest-related cough and fast and/or difficult breathing in the last two weeks who were taken to an appropriate health provider Water and Sanitation Percentage of households of children age 0-23 months that treat water effectively Percentage of mothers of children age 0-23 months who lived in a household with soap at the place for hand washing Anthropometrics Percentage of children age 0-23 months who are underweight (-2SD for the median weight for age, according to WHO/NCHS reference population)
1 Methods
1.1 Partnership Building in the Survey preparation :
Dans le mois de Aout 2011 et en prparation a lenqute KPC de Septembre ,lEquipe du projet a envoy des lettres de participation a la prparation et a la mise en uvre de lEnqute KPC. Ces structures sont : La Mission USAID a Niamey La Direction Rgional8 de la sant publique de Tahoua Le District Sanitaire La Direction dpartemental de lAgriculture La Direction dpartement du Plan Les ONGS Mouviento Por La PAZ et Initiatives pour la scurisation des Mnages (ISCV) de Konni La Direction National de linformation sanitaire (DSSRE)
La Runion du Comit de Pilotage de lEnqute KPC sest tenue le 16-17 septembre en vue de passer en revue le niveau de prparation de lEnqute sur : Revue des Termes de Rfrences de la formation des enquteurs, Revue des drafts doutils de collecte des donnes adapts par lEquipe du projet Aspects logistiques de lorganisation de lEnqute : Matriels et quipement ( toise et Balance, Mdicaments, Moustiquaires), identification des enquteurs etc. Ainsi les contributions des partenaires dans la collecte des ressources ncessaire a la ralisation de cette enqute sont les suivants : CONCERN Tahoua : Toise et Balance District Sanitaire de konni : Echantillon de Medicaments ( Paracetamol, Fer acid folique, Vitamine A, Zince , Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine, balance, Moustiquaires impregnes, etc) et un superviseur ISCV : Local et chaises pour la formation des enqueteurs Datashow Superviseur et Enqueteurs Direction Departementale du Plan : Base des donnes demographiques Superviseurs En annexe les lettres dinvitations de ces structures ( USAID, DRSP, DS, MPDL)
Methodology, review and adaptation of questionnaires and Training agenda and logistic and budget arrangement to conduct the Training of Supervisors. The planning intervenes during an ultimate Budget Revision process that significantly reduces provision of funds for the Final Evaluation. The Budget Revision process delayed availability of project funds wire in country to start implementation of the KPC that finally come to Mid Sept 2011. To accommodate the short time implementation of the Survey, the project management Team decided to recall Survey Trainers and Enumerators who participated in the Initial KPC survey. This could improve the quality of the Training and save time. Questionnaire: The scope of the survey and the development of the survey questions were focused on the four intervention area of the project: Maternal and newborn healthcare Control & treatment of malaria Control & treatment of diarrheal disease Nutrition/Food Security The survey questionnaire was 87 questions in length excluding the anthropometrics. The anthropometrics consisted of three measurements: height, weight, and MUAC (where appropriate). The questionnaire was translated into French from the final English version. During the survey the French questionnaire was used as a guide for the verbalization of the survey into Hausa (the local language). Hausa translations of key words are included in annexe6 Training of Suveryors Trainer (TOST) From Sept 1617 2011, the Project Senior staff, Konni Health District and Local Government Technical Services Chief Officer trained five supervisors. 3 supervisors participated in the initial KPC and all have some professional survey experience according to the Learning Need assessment. Agenda and content of TOST are in annexe2. It includes review of KPC general purpose and sampling, review of questionnaire and logistics for conducting Surveyors training. An Adaptation of Key local language items of Initial KPC was done. Supervisors contributed insight into traditions and cultural issues that could impact survey results, and brainstormed solutions to overcome bias. Training of Surveyors RIs survey supervisors conducted a two-day training of 30 interviewers to prepare them for the use of the questionnaire, anthropometric measurement equipment, and presentation samples. Since 50% of the Surveyors participated in the 2008 initial KPC, the supervisors involved them to participate to the rest of the interviewers. The teams of interviewers practiced completing the questionnaire in Konni town on the second training day. A list of highly experienced interviewers in anthropometrics was established to set up 5 Teams for the Field data collection. The supervisors met with the program manager and the coordination Team at the end of each day for feedback and to finalize plans for the survey implementation. The KPC survey was collaborative effort of RI staff and local partners/stakeholders. Some of the constraints in making this Final KPC included the following: Delay in start up and Limited funds to recruit more enumerators Limited timeline ( 2 days TOST, 2 days TOT and 5 days data collection)
The survey data was entered into Epi Info and checked for analysis. The data management is composed of one staff from the MOH HIS , one project M&E Staff and the Project Manager. Due to the tight timeline to submit an Outline of the Interim by the Consultant and questionnaire check remained incomplete and continued through the analysis phase. Several back and forth on the questionnaires lead to a preliminary analysis of the Priority Rapid Cath Indicator. Analysis of one indicator revealed to be difficult to calculate to the Team: complementary feeding composite indicator. Disease data tables locked and were not accessible temporary for analysis. A special assistance from Niger WHO Statistician was requested. As results, by September 30, the End of the Child Survival Official contracting period for Project Staff and therefore the core team of the Survey, IYCF indicators were missing. 2 months later in Dec 15, the Former child Survival Project was recalled by Relief International-HQ to complete the analysis and the Report. Challenges and Issues during the Survey Implementation: Throughout the whole Survey Process, the Team worked under pressure of finalizing the whole KPC survey and to assist the Consultant to do the qualitative assessment within 9 days before the official End of the Project Contracting period. Despite the commitment of the Survey Team, this working atmosphere has resulted in some biases worthy to mention here: Data Collection phase: Some Mothers Prenatal consultation cards were not filled even though child vaccination confirmed by the Village worker register and the Mother saying. Weight for height Measurement was all done by a team of Six measurers, therefore multiplying the risk of same measurer errors. For children under 30 days (One month) too small to be weighed or sick, Weight was replaced by Birth weight in the Child Cards or replaced by same age children who was known either by recall or in the Child Health Card. The total replacement done was about. Thus could inflate Num of children less than one month age and too small to be measured some surveyor have reported either 0 Month or 1 month for Children less that under 1 month or 1 month
Analysis: 2 missing questionnaires in a remote cluster that was identified only at the analysis phase without any practical option to go back to the village to complete the missing questionnaire, An insufficient verification of the data that resulted in missing data in some questionnaires
Result
Sommaire
1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 Introduction..................................................................................................................1 Demographic Characteristics.......................................................................................1 Maternal and newborn care:.........................................................................................2 Breastfeeding................................................................................................................4 Vitamin A Supplementation.........................................................................................5 Vaccination:.................................................................................................................5 Malaria:........................................................................................................................7 Discussions and Recommendations............................................................................8
1.1 Introduction
This section presents the findings of the Final knowledge, attitude and coverage survey that was conducted in the Konni District, Niger. Findings are presented under the following categories; Demographics characteristics ,Maternal and newborn health, child spacing, breast feeding, vitamin A supplementation, child immunization, malaria, control of diarrhea, Acute Respiratory Infections, water and sanitation and Anthropometrics. This section also compares baseline with endline findings.
Table 2: Sex of Children under 2 (n=358) Sex of children (n=358) Female Male Total Freq 137 163 358 % 45.7 54.3 100.0
60% of deliveries take place in the Health centers. It is twice the baseline line (29%). While there has been modest increase in the extension of Health facility coverage between 2007 (52 Health post) and 2011 (60 Health post) in the Konni District in general. In the surveyed 60 villages, the number of HP and Primary Health Care ( CSI) Centers has even remained unchanged. Improved Health care delivery and Community Mobilization in project area may have contributed . Table 6: Assistance during the Delivery (n=358)
Person who assisted Doctor/ Nurse/Midwife HP worker Traditional birth attendant Other Not assisted Total
% 45 8 40
100.0
*within this group, 4 responses were categorized as auxiliaire and the cross check on where this staff exist shows that they are in Health Centers. This could be related to Health post workers ( HPw) who temporarily work in Integrated Health Centers ( CSI) during the Frequent absence of the Chief CSI nurse in the majority of Health centers staffed by only one or 2 nurses. The Catch indicator includes Health post worker as qualified Personnel since they were trained by Project in Clean Delivery. Some of this HPW are nurses but may not be known as such by respondents. There almost 40% of delivery still attended by TBA (Matrons) even though they are not considered as skilled personnel. The project has devoted considerable time in the sensitization to teach to TBA in their new role of companion to delivery . Table 6: Home delivery By TBA HomedeliveryTBA Yes No Total Frequency 67 75 142 Percent 47,2% 52,8% 100,0%
95% Conf Limits Yes 38,8% 55,7% No 44,3% 61,2% Comments: when we cross where do the Birth assisted by matrons took, we find that only half of them were at Home, 50% of these Births assisted by TBA( 75/142) occurred in Health Centers. This is well know practices particularly in CSI and District Hospital where matrons are still used for night shift under Midwife supervision. Officially matrons are expected even in those centers to only accompany Parturient to Maternity and help the women in post partum wards. But the reality is that matrons continue to assist delivery when the Midwife actually went to rest during night guards.
Was a Clean Delivery Kit used during delivery? Yes No Do Not Know Total
% 76 23 1 100.0
76% of the deliveries benefited clean delivery kit. Project has provided a single use delivery Kit in health centers. The Kit comprises a 2 Yards Cloth to wrap the baby, a razor blade for Cordon Section, a gloves and soap. While 60% of the delivery occurred in health centers, approximately 16% of Kit used were either at home or elsewhere. This is a significant increase compared to 21% of Kit delivery use at baseline KPC Table 8: Post Natal check for Mother within first week When did the Check take place ? Hour 1 Day 1 Week1 Do not Know Total Frequency 159 19 3 20 201 Percent 79,1% 9,5% 1,5% 10,0% 100,0%
95% Conf Limits 72,8 Hours % Day1 5,8% Do not Know 6,2% Week 1 0,3%
88% (178/201) of mothers who delivered in Health Centers had a post natal check within the first week and 80% of them had the check within the day after delivery. The total number of the respondents matches with 213 who delivered in Health Center. Only 29 mothers were able to identify the Health personnel who performed the Check. Half of them (51%) were done by Health post Worker. 4 checks done by midwifes and 2 by Doctors. It appears clearly that Doctor and Midwife are most recognizable or may be more communicative (?) Than Nurses and Health Post worker, since the number of deliveries assisted by Midwife and Doctors are the same for the post natal checks.
Table 9: Post Natal Check within 3 days for New born Freq 34 29 63 Percent 54,0% 46,0% 100,0%
Yes No Total
36% (63/216) of mothers said that their baby was checked by the health personnel of the facility where they delivered but only half of the Newborn (38) were checked within the week after birth.
1.4 Breastfeeding
Time Within 1 hour (Initiation ) After 1 hour Did not Know Total Freq 339 13 6 358 % 94% 62.0 2.7 100.0
Table10: Time of Breastfeeding after Birth (n=358) 94% of the newborn were breastfed Immediately ( with 1 hour) and same proportion were given colostrums during the first 3 days after birth and 84% of the newborn were not given any other feed during the same period. This is twice (42% at baseline) higher than baseline rate.
Freq 77 9*
% 72 8.4
Table11: Exclusive Breafeeding (EBF)/ breastmilk and simple water (n= 107) Exclusive Breastfeeding is one of the most cost effective interventions in child survival project especially in developing countries. The Guidelines recommend that a child is not given any other feeds than breast milk until 6 month except medicine. The findings showed a 72% of children under 6 month exclusively Breast feed. This is a significant increase compared to baseline value of 36%.
Received Vit A (at least once) Yes No Did not know Blank Total
% 74 25 1 0 100.0
The survey noted that among children aged 6-23 months 74% were reported to have received a dose of vitamin A in the last six months while baseline weighed 72% of the children aged 6-23 months received a dose of vitamin A in the last six months.
1.6 Vaccination:
Table 13: Health Card/vaccination possession
Do you have a card where your childs vaccinations are written down? Freq 273 1 68 16 358 % 76,3 ,3 19,0 4,5 100,0
Yes,seen by the Surveyor Do not Know Not availalbe Never had a Card Total
73% of mothers possess Health or vaccination cards. Baseline line value is 61%. The major issue with Health/vaccination card is that they are not filled mostly by Health personnel.
72% (258/358) of mother mentioned to have received vaccination that is not written in the book. Freq 94 49 % 78 41
Penta 1 Penta3
Table 14: Children who received Penta 1 / Penta3 (n=120, children 12-23mth who possess vaccination card)
Table 15: Children who received Vit A (Most Recent Dose, children 6-23, card seen by enumerator)
Yes No NA Total
% 56 19 25 100.0
This result is obtained from a cross table of Q44 (did the child receive a single dose of Vitamin A with the last 6 month) and Q45 ( do the mother possess a vaccination card?) as indicated in the KPC 2000Tabulation guide .The 65 responses categorized as NA includes children 8-23 month who either have the card and not available (n=50) or never possess a vaccination card (n= 11) or 1 mother was not clear whether she possessed a card or not and therefore classified as No. If the we calculate the percentage of children whose mother said to have received a single dose of Vitamin A whether or not they have a vaccination card, then the percentage increase to 74%. In contrary when we calculate the proportion of children who possessed a vaccination card in which is mentioned that the child has received a Vitamin A dose either the date is or not found; the percentage will drop to 11% only.
Freq
236 32 90* 358
%
66 8,9 24.1 100,0
66% of children were reported to have received BCG. In infant less than 12 month 70% ( 137/202) had the BCG. Pending the incertainty of the 26% of Non specified responses in either baseline and endline survey, this proportion is lower than the 71% (166/234) weighed at baseline.
63% (99/156) in children 12-23month had the BCG.when compared to 2010 National Child Survival Survey who found 72% for Tahoua Region, Konni district declines in BCG coverage. In fact, Konni District has one the lowest vaccination coverage with recurrent outbreaks of
Table 17: Children who received Measles vaccine (children 9-23, card seen by enumerator):
The percentage of children who had measles vaccination is calculated among children 9-23. 51% of them had the vaccination. The percentage remains the same when it is calculated among children 12-23mth ( 52%= 78/151)
1.1 Malaria:
Table 18: Children who had Malaria and received appropriate Treatment 59% (212/358) of the children had fever in the last 2 weeks prior the survey and 68% of them were treated with appropriate anti malarial ( ACT, Fansidar, Chloro and amodiaquine) within 24h of the onset of the fever. This is a moderate decrease in the prevalence of malaria from 2008 KPC (64%) but access to the treatment has been significantly improved from 17.5% in 2008. Coexistence of reported high prevalence of malaria cases and ITNS alleged used in survey in a National pattern known in Niger by Both small scale project and the National Malaria Program. Possible reason to look at in further investigation are the time people start using the ITN at night time and issues pertaining to drug resistance because even though the National policy has adopted since 2008 use of combined Artemisin drugs, Choloroquine, amodiaquine are still be used as first line therapy mostly by Ambulant Pharmacist.
National survey cluster representatively is limited of the Tahoua Region where Konni is one of the 7 Health Districts. The Survey supported semi -quantitative observations done by the MTE Evaluation that Breastfeeding has significantly increased in the project area. Complementary Feeding: ( to be completed after indicator calculation) On Brezs 74% of children aged 6-23 month received a dose of Vitamin A in the last 6 month according to mother recall and whiles it is only 10% in the baseline KPC. If we exclude responses from Mothers whose card do not mention a precise date Vitamin is received, then the proportion drops to 8% (20/251). DHS calculate this indicator for children 0-5yrs and 2006 DHS found 70% of children fewer than 5 yrs who have received a supplement of mega dose Vitamin. Biannual campaign of National vaccination days are organized in Niger. Since the dose are renewed every six month to moving cohort of under 5 children, the stagnation of the proportion over 4 years This indicate almost the limitation of the distribution strategy rather.
The endline survey identified an improvement in health seeking behavior among mothers with children aged 0-23 months as evidenced by increased use of appropriate health provider to manage cough and fast and/or difficult breathing of children aged 0-23 months from baseline findings (44% vs 18.2%). Even though ARI treatment is not a priority intervention of the Konni. Improvement of case management has been promoted through capacity building of Health post worker in C-IMCI and better linkages for referral through care group mobilization.
Annexe:
Q15:Did you ever breastfeed your child? Effectifs Valide NON OUI Total Pourcentage 4 1,1 354 358 98,9 100,0 Pourcentag Pourcentag e valide e cumul 1,1 1,1 98,9 100,0 100,0
Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast? Effectifs Valide HEURE IMMEDIATEMENT JOURS NSP Total Pourcentage 80 22,3 259 13 6 358 72,3 3,6 1,7 100,0 Pourcentag e valide 22,3 72,3 3,6 1,7 100,0 Pourcentag e cumul 22,3 94,7 98,3 100,0
Q17:During the first three or four days after delivery, before your regular milk began flowing, did you give your child the liquid (colostrum) that came from your breast? Effectifs Valide NON OUI Pourcentage 18 5,0 340 95,0 Pourcentag Pourcentag e valide e cumul 5,0 5,0 95,0 100,0
Total
358
100,0
100,0
Q18: In the first three days after delivery, was your child given anything to drink other than breast milk? Effectifs Valide NON OUI Total Pourcentage 302 84,4 56 358 15,6 100,0 Pourcentag e valide 84,4 15,6 100,0 Pourcentag e cumul 84,4 100,0
Q16:How long after birth did you first put your child to the breast? Effectifs 80 259 13 6 358 Pourcentag e 22,3 72,3 3,6 1,7 100,0 Pourcentag Pourcentag e valide e cumul 22,3 22,3 72,3 3,6 1,7 100,0 94,7 98,3 100,0
Valid e
Q44: tr_age 1 Valide NON OUI Total NON NSP OUI Total
Effec Pource tifs ntage 25 82 107 63 4 184 251 23,4 76,6 100,0 25,1 1,6 73,3 100,0
Valide
Pourcen tage valide 23,4 76,6 100,0 25,1 1,6 73,3 100,0
Forward VITAMINEA Frequency Percent Cum Percent 40241 1 3,6% 3,6% 40387 1 3,6% 7,1% 40494 1 3,6% 10,7% 40538 1 3,6% 14,3% 40559 1 3,6% 17,9% 40570 1 3,6% 21,4% 40596 1 3,6% 25,0% 40608 1 3,6% 28,6% 40617 1 3,6% 32,1% 40624 1 3,6% 35,7%
40628 40647 40659 40663 40681 40697 40717 40718 40721 40756 40768 40779 40783 47484 146099 Total 95% Conf Limits 40241 0,1% 18,3% 40387 0,1% 18,3% 40494 0,1% 18,3% 40538 0,1% 18,3% 40559 0,1% 18,3% 40570 0,1% 18,3% 40596 0,1% 18,3% 40608 0,1% 18,3% 40617 0,1% 18,3% 40624 0,1% 18,3% 40628 0,1% 18,3% 40647 0,1% 18,3% 40659 0,1% 18,3% 40663 0,9% 23,5% 40681 0,1% 18,3% 40697 0,1% 18,3% 40717 0,1% 18,3% 40718 0,1% 18,3% 40721 0,1% 18,3% 40756 0,1% 18,3% 40768 0,1% 18,3% 40779 0,1% 18,3% 40783 0,1% 18,3% 47484 2,3% 28,2% 146099 0,1% 18,3%
1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 2 7,1% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 1 3,6% 3 10,7% 1 3,6% 28 100,0%
39,3% 42,9% 46,4% 53,6% 57,1% 60,7% 64,3% 67,9% 71,4% 75,0% 78,6% 82,1% 85,7% 96,4% 100,0% 100,0%
Q44 VITAMINEA NON OUI TOTAL 40241 0 1 1 1.6.1.3 Single Table Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Analysis Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40387 0 1 1 ChiProbability df Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 square Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 28,0000 24 0,2600 40494 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 An expected value is < 5. Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 Chi-square not valid. 40538 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 Tab: Exclusive 40559 0 1 1 Breastfeeding Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40570 0 1 1 bf Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Exclusive Breasfeeding % 0,0 3,84 3,6 1 Col 2 3 5 Total 0 9 1 6 1 0 tr_age 1 Effectif 9240596 0 107 Row % 0,0 100,05,6% 100,0 % compris 86,0% ,0% 8,4% ,0% 100,0% Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 dans tr_age % compris 29,5%40608 ,0% 34,6% 40,0% ,0% 29,9% 1 0 1 dans bf Row % 100,0 0,0 100,0 % du total 25,7% ,0% 2,5% ,0% 29,9% Col % 50,0 0,01,7% 3,6 2 Effectif 220 251 40617 3 0 17 1 9 1 2 % compris 87,6% 1,2% 6,8% ,8% 100,0% Row % 0,0 100,03,6% 100,0 dans tr_age Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 % compris 70,5% 100,0% 65,4% 60,0% 100,0% 70,1% 40624 0 1 1 dans bf % du total 61,5% ,8% 4,7% ,6% 70,1% Row % 0,0 100,02,5% 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40628 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40647 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40659 0 1 1 :\Users\Relief2\Desktop\KPC report ne\Ali Results Dec 100,0 Row % 0,0 100,0 26\ClasseurfullrecombinedHMdec27.xls:Feuil1$ 3,8 Col % 0,0 3,6 Select: (Q45 = "Oui, vu par l'enqueteur" ) AND (Age > 40663 0 2 2 11 Row % ) 0,0 100,0 100,0 Record Count:% 0,0 7,7 Col 120 7,1 Date: 31/12/2011 18:02:44 40681 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6 40697 0 1 1 Row % 0,0 100,0 100,0 Col % 0,0 3,8 3,6
1.6.1.5 DTC1Penta1
Forward DTC1Penta1 Frequency Percent Cum Percent 22/05/2001 1 1,1% 1,1% 28/12/2009 1 1,1% 2,1% 24/02/2010 2 2,1% 4,3% 15/03/2010 1 1,1% 5,3% 26/03/2010 1 1,1% 6,4% 09/04/2010 1 1,1% 7,4% 21/04/2010 1 1,1% 8,5% 23/04/2010 1 1,1% 9,6% 24/04/2010 1 1,1% 10,6% 27/04/2010 1 1,1% 11,7% 05/06/2010 1 1,1% 12,8% 21/06/2010 1 1,1% 13,8% 27/06/2010 1 1,1% 14,9% 16/07/2010 1 1,1% 16,0% 29/07/2010 3 3,2% 19,1% 26/08/2010 1 1,1% 20,2% 03/09/2010 1 1,1% 21,3% 05/09/2010 1 1,1% 22,3% 08/09/2010 1 1,1% 23,4% 22/09/2010 1 1,1% 24,5% 23/09/2010 1 1,1% 25,5% 24/09/2010 1 1,1% 26,6% 11/10/2010 1 1,1% 27,7% 23/10/2010 1 1,1% 28,7% 23/11/2010 1 1,1% 29,8% 25/11/2010 1 1,1% 30,9% 06/12/2010 1 1,1% 31,9% 08/12/2010 1 1,1% 33,0% 22/12/2010 1 1,1% 34,0% 05/01/2011 1 1,1% 35,1% 07/01/2011 1 1,1% 36,2% 15/01/2011 1 1,1% 37,2% 20/01/2011 1 1,1% 38,3% 22/01/2011 1 1,1% 39,4% 24/01/2011 1 1,1% 40,4% 25/01/2011 1 1,1% 41,5%
15/02/2011 21/02/2011 26/02/2011 14/03/2011 29/03/2011 13/04/2011 21/04/2011 25/04/2011 30/04/2011 02/05/2011 11/05/2011 12/05/2011 18/05/2011 26/05/2011 27/05/2011 28/05/2011 30/05/2011 31/05/2011 03/06/2011 05/06/2011 21/06/2011 22/06/2011 23/06/2011 24/06/2011 25/06/2011 26/06/2011 28/06/2011 30/06/2011 04/07/2011 17/07/2011 22/07/2011 29/07/2011 10/08/2011 17/08/2011 28/08/2011 12/09/2011 13/09/2011 20/09/2011 28/10/2011 26/11/2011 03/09/2019 01/01/2030 Total 95% Conf Limits
1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 5 5,3% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 4 4,3% 2 2,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 3 3,2% 2 2,1% 1 1,1% 2 2,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 2 2,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 1 1,1% 94 100,0%
42,6% 43,6% 44,7% 45,7% 46,8% 47,9% 48,9% 50,0% 55,3% 56,4% 57,4% 58,5% 59,6% 60,6% 61,7% 62,8% 63,8% 64,9% 69,1% 71,3% 72,3% 73,4% 74,5% 77,7% 79,8% 80,9% 83,0% 84,0% 85,1% 87,2% 88,3% 89,4% 90,4% 91,5% 92,6% 93,6% 94,7% 95,7% 96,8% 97,9% 98,9% 100,0% 100,0%
22/05/2001 28/12/2009 24/02/2010 15/03/2010 26/03/2010 09/04/2010 21/04/2010 23/04/2010 24/04/2010 27/04/2010 05/06/2010 21/06/2010 27/06/2010 16/07/2010 29/07/2010 26/08/2010 03/09/2010 05/09/2010 08/09/2010 22/09/2010 23/09/2010 24/09/2010 11/10/2010 23/10/2010 23/11/2010 25/11/2010 06/12/2010 08/12/2010 22/12/2010 05/01/2011 07/01/2011 15/01/2011 20/01/2011 22/01/2011 24/01/2011 25/01/2011 15/02/2011 21/02/2011 26/02/2011 14/03/2011 29/03/2011 13/04/2011 21/04/2011 25/04/2011 30/04/2011 02/05/2011 11/05/2011
0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,3% 7,5% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,7% 9,0% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 1,7% 12,0% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8%
12/05/2011 18/05/2011 26/05/2011 27/05/2011 28/05/2011 30/05/2011 31/05/2011 03/06/2011 05/06/2011 21/06/2011 22/06/2011 23/06/2011 24/06/2011 25/06/2011 26/06/2011 28/06/2011 30/06/2011 04/07/2011 17/07/2011 22/07/2011 29/07/2011 10/08/2011 17/08/2011 28/08/2011 12/09/2011 13/09/2011 20/09/2011 28/10/2011 26/11/2011 03/09/2019 01/01/2030
0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 1,2% 10,5% 0,3% 7,5% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,7% 9,0% 0,3% 7,5% 0,0% 5,8% 0,3% 7,5% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,3% 7,5% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8% 0,0% 5,8%
1.6.1.6 DTC3Penta3
Back Forward Current Procedure DTC3Penta3 Frequency Percent Cum Percent 24/04/2010 1 2,0% 2,0% 10/05/2010 1 2,0% 4,1% 22/06/2010 1 2,0% 6,1% 24/06/2010 1 2,0% 8,2% 21/08/2010 1 2,0% 10,2% 27/08/2010 1 2,0% 12,2% 09/09/2010 1 2,0% 14,3% 19/10/2010 1 2,0% 16,3% 10/11/2010 1 2,0% 18,4%
11/11/2010 07/12/2010 20/12/2010 14/01/2011 15/02/2011 21/02/2011 23/02/2011 09/03/2011 15/03/2011 22/03/2011 25/03/2011 18/04/2011 15/05/2011 18/05/2011 03/06/2011 04/06/2011 20/06/2011 29/06/2011 05/07/2011 12/07/2011 15/07/2011 20/07/2011 25/07/2011 26/07/2011 29/07/2011 31/07/2011 13/08/2011 27/08/2011 28/08/2011 09/09/2011 18/09/2011 11/10/2011 02/11/2011 14/11/2011 22/11/2011 Total
1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 2 4,1% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 2 4,1% 2 4,1% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 2 4,1% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 2 4,1% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 1 2,0% 49 100,0%
20,4% 22,4% 24,5% 28,6% 30,6% 32,7% 34,7% 36,7% 38,8% 40,8% 42,9% 44,9% 46,9% 49,0% 53,1% 57,1% 59,2% 61,2% 63,3% 65,3% 67,3% 69,4% 71,4% 73,5% 77,6% 79,6% 81,6% 83,7% 87,8% 89,8% 91,8% 93,9% 95,9% 98,0% 100,0% 100,0%
95% Conf Limits 24/04/2010 0,1% 10,9% 10/05/2010 0,1% 10,9% 22/06/2010 0,1% 10,9% 24/06/2010 0,1% 10,9% 21/08/2010 0,1% 10,9% 27/08/2010 0,1% 10,9% 09/09/2010 0,1% 10,9%
19/10/2010 10/11/2010 11/11/2010 07/12/2010 20/12/2010 14/01/2011 15/02/2011 21/02/2011 23/02/2011 09/03/2011 15/03/2011 22/03/2011 25/03/2011 18/04/2011 15/05/2011 18/05/2011 03/06/2011 04/06/2011 20/06/2011 29/06/2011 05/07/2011 12/07/2011 15/07/2011 20/07/2011 25/07/2011 26/07/2011 29/07/2011 31/07/2011 13/08/2011 27/08/2011 28/08/2011 09/09/2011 18/09/2011 11/10/2011 02/11/2011 14/11/2011 22/11/2011
0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,5% 14,0% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,5% 14,0% 0,5% 14,0% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,5% 14,0% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,5% 14,0% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9% 0,1% 10,9%
Select age>11, freq Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent NON 37 32,2% 32,2% OUI 78 67,8% 100,0%
Total
115 100,0%
100,0%
Next Procedure Forward Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent NON 43 31,4% 31,4% OUI 94 68,6% 100,0% Total 137 100,0% 100,0% 95% Conf Limits NON 23,7% 39,9% OUI 60,1% 76,3%
Next Procedure Forward Recevoir_VAR Frequency Percent Cum Percent NON 37 32,2% 32,2% OUI 78 67,8% 100,0% Total 115 100,0% 100,0% 95% Conf Limits NON 23,8% 41,5% OUI 58,5% 76,2% Bibliograhy : 1. 2. 3. 4.
5. 6. 7. 8. 9.
RN/Institut National de la Statistique :Equete Survie de lEnfant Juin 2010 RN/ District Sanitaire konni : Plan de Developpeemnt Sanitaire 2012-2016 RN/ Institut National de la statistique : Enquete Nutrition Juin 2011 Population Niger 2011: http//www.ins.ne
Classement Niger :http://hdrstats.undp.org/fr/pays/profils/NER.html Indicateur s Education Niger: http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?c=ng&v=39&l=fr RN /Ministere de la SantPublique. Plan de Developpement Sanitaire du Niger adopt Janvier 2011. RN/Ministre de la Sant Publique. Avant-projet de Stratgie National de Survie de lEnfant, 2008 ; page 30. RN/Ministere de la Sant Publique. Plan National pour la Nutrition PNN 2011-2015
10. USAID/GH/HIDN/Child Survival and Health Grants ProgramTRM MATERNAL AND NEWBORN CARE2009 11. USAID/GH/HIDN/Child Survival and Health Grants ProgramTRMDiarrheal Disease Prevention and Control-2010 12. USAID/GH/HIDN/Child Survival and Health Grants ProgramTRMMalaria 2009
13. Sarriot, E., P. Winch, W. Weiss, and J. Wagman. 1999. Methodological and sampling Issues for KPC surveys. Available at CSTS Web site (www.childsurvival.com) under KPC2000+. 14. USAID/Core group: KPC 2000 plus Field Guide 15. USAID/CSHGP: Final Evaluation Guidelines May 2011 16. Niger Stats;http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/countries/profiles/NER.html 17. Relief International: Child Survival Annual Report FY07-08 Oct 31 2008 18. Relief International: Child Survival Mid Term Evaluation Mars 2010
19.