Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Status:
Case Analysis
Where Reported
[1994] 1 W.L.R. 1071; [1994] 3 All E.R. 686; [1994] 1 Lloyd's Rep.
492; [1994] C.L.C. 133; Times, February 23, 1994; Independent,
March 2, 1994
Case Digest
Page2
446, Clay v AJ Crump & Sons Ltd [1964] 1 Q.B. 533 distinguished).
Judge: Balcombe, L.J.; Mann, L.J.; Savill, L.J.
Counsel: For NKK: Richard Aikens Q.C. and Jonathan Harvie Q.C.
. For MR: Peter Gross Q.C..
Solicitor: For NKK: Norton Rose. . For MR: Lovell White Durrant.
Murphy v Brentwood DC
[1991] 1 A.C. 398; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 414; [1990] 2 All E.R. 908; [1990]
2 Lloyd's Rep. 467; 50 B.L.R. 1; 21 Con. L.R. 1; (1990) 22 H.L.R.
502; 89 L.G.R. 24; (1991) 3 Admin. L.R. 37; (1990) 6 Const. L.J.
304; (1990) 154 L.G. Rev. 1010; [1990] E.G. 105 (C.S.); (1990)
87(30) L.S.G. 15; (1990) 134 S.J. 1076; Times, July 27, 1990;
Independent, July 27, 1990; HL
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
[1990] 2 A.C. 605; [1990] 2 W.L.R. 358; [1990] 1 All E.R. 568; [1990]
B.C.C. 164; [1990] B.C.L.C. 273; [1990] E.C.C. 313; [1955-95]
P.N.L.R. 523; (1990) 87(12) L.S.G. 42; (1990) 140 N.L.J. 248;
(1990) 134 S.J. 494; Times, February 12, 1990; Independent,
February 16, 1990; Financial Times, February 13, 1990; Guardian,
February 15, 1990; Daily Telegraph, February 15, 1990; HL
Clay v AJ Crump & Sons Ltd
[1964] 1 Q.B. 533; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 866; [1963] 3 All E.R. 687; 4
B.L.R. 80; (1963) 107 S.J. 664; CA
Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
Page3
[1962] A.C. 446; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 186; [1962] 1 All E.R. 1; [1961] 2
Lloyd's Rep. 365; (1962) 106 S.J. 34; HL
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd
[1936] A.C. 85; PC (Aus)
Donoghue v Stevenson
[1932] A.C. 562; 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31; 1932 S.L.T. 317; [1932] W.N.
139; HL
White v Jones
[1993] 3 W.L.R. 730; [1993] 3 All E.R. 481; (1993) 90(23) L.S.G. 43;
(1993) 143 N.L.J. 473; [1993] N.P.C. 37; Times, March 9, 1993;
Independent, March 5, 1993; CA (Civ Div)
Gran Gelato Ltd v Richcliff (Group) Ltd
[1992] Ch. 560; [1992] 2 W.L.R. 867; [1992] 1 All E.R. 865; [1992] 1
E.G.L.R. 297; [1991] E.G. 136 (C.S.); (1992) 142 N.L.J. 51; Times,
December 19, 1991; Independent, December 18, 1991; Ch D
Nitrigin Eireann Teoranta v Inco Alloys Ltd
[1992] 1 W.L.R. 498; [1992] 1 All E.R. 854; 60 B.L.R. 65; (1992)
89(3) L.S.G. 34; (1991) 141 N.L.J. 1518; [1991] N.P.C. 17; Times,
November 4, 1991; Independent, November 28, 1991; QBD
Mobil Oil Hong Kong and Dow Chemical (Hong Kong) v Hong
Kong United Dockyards (The Hua Lien)
[1991] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 309; PC (HK)
Murphy v Brentwood DC
[1991] 1 A.C. 398; [1990] 3 W.L.R. 414; [1990] 2 All E.R. 908; [1990]
2 Lloyd's Rep. 467; 50 B.L.R. 1; 21 Con. L.R. 1; (1990) 22 H.L.R.
502; 89 L.G.R. 24; (1991) 3 Admin. L.R. 37; (1990) 6 Const. L.J.
304; (1990) 154 L.G. Rev. 1010; [1990] E.G. 105 (C.S.); (1990)
87(30) L.S.G. 15; (1990) 134 S.J. 1076; Times, July 27, 1990;
Independent, July 27, 1990; HL
Mariola Marine Corp v Lloyd's Register of Shipping (The
Morning Watch)
[1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 547; [1991] E.C.C. 103; QBD (Comm)
Caparo Industries Plc v Dickman
[1990] 2 A.C. 605; [1990] 2 W.L.R. 358; [1990] 1 All E.R. 568; [1990]
B.C.C. 164; [1990] B.C.L.C. 273; [1990] E.C.C. 313; [1955-95]
P.N.L.R. 523; (1990) 87(12) L.S.G. 42; (1990) 140 N.L.J. 248;
(1990) 134 S.J. 494; Times, February 12, 1990; Independent,
February 16, 1990; Financial Times, February 13, 1990; Guardian,
February 15, 1990; Daily Telegraph, February 15, 1990; HL
Cia Portorafti Commerciale SA v Ultramar Panama Inc (The
Captain Gregos) (No.1)
[1990] 3 All E.R. 967; [1990] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 310; Financial Times,
December 22, 1989; Lloyd's List, February 9, 1990; CA (Civ Div)
Norwich City Council v Harvey (Paul Clarke)
[1989] 1 W.L.R. 828; [1989] 1 All E.R. 1180; 45 B.L.R. 14; (1989) 5
Const. L.J. 154; (1989) 86(25) L.S.G. 45; (1989) 139 N.L.J. 40;
(1989) 133 S.J. 694; Times, January 11, 1989; Independent,
Page4
Page5
S.J. 377; HL
Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co (Contractors) Ltd
[1973] Q.B. 27; [1972] 3 W.L.R. 502; [1972] 3 All E.R. 557; 14 K.I.R.
75; (1972) 116 S.J. 648; CA (Civ Div)
Home Office v Dorset Yacht Co Ltd
[1970] A.C. 1004; [1970] 2 W.L.R. 1140; [1970] 2 All E.R. 294;
[1970] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 453; (1970) 114 S.J. 375; HL
Clay v AJ Crump & Sons Ltd
[1964] 1 Q.B. 533; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 866; [1963] 3 All E.R. 687; 4
B.L.R. 80; (1963) 107 S.J. 664; CA
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd
[1964] A.C. 465; [1963] 3 W.L.R. 101; [1963] 2 All E.R. 575; [1963] 1
Lloyd's Rep. 485; (1963) 107 S.J. 454; HL
Scruttons Ltd v Midland Silicones Ltd
[1962] A.C. 446; [1962] 2 W.L.R. 186; [1962] 1 All E.R. 1; [1961] 2
Lloyd's Rep. 365; (1962) 106 S.J. 34; HL
Riverstone Meat Co Pty Ltd v Lancashire Shipping Co Ltd (The
Muncaster Castle)
[1961] A.C. 807; [1961] 2 W.L.R. 269; [1961] 1 All E.R. 495; [1961] 1
Lloyd's Rep. 57; 1961 A.M.C. 1357; (1961) 105 S.J. 148; HL
Candler v Crane Christmas & Co
[1951] 2 K.B. 164; [1951] 1 All E.R. 426; [1951] 1 T.L.R. 371; (1951)
95 S.J. 171; CA
Haseldine v Daw & Son Ltd
[1941] 2 K.B. 343; CA
Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd
[1936] A.C. 85; PC (Aus)
Donoghue v Stevenson
[1932] A.C. 562; 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31; 1932 S.L.T. 317; [1932] W.N.
139; HL
Considered
Philcox v Civil Aviation Authority
(1995) 92(27) L.S.G. 33; (1995) 139 S.J.L.B. 146; Times, June 8,
1995; Official Transcript; CA (Civ Div)
Mentioned by
Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council
[2004] EWCA Civ 175; [2004] P.N.L.R. 30; (2004) 101(13) L.S.G.
36; [2004] Env. L.R. D8; Times, March 19, 2004; Official Transcript;
CA (Civ Div)
Mentioned by
Wattleworth v Goodwood Road Racing Co Ltd
Page6
Page7
L.R. 705; [1995] Fam. Law 537; (1996) 160 L.G. Rev. 123; (1996)
160 L.G. Rev. 103; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 993; Times, June 30, 1995;
Independent, June 30, 1995; HL
Considered
Philcox v Civil Aviation Authority
(1995) 92(27) L.S.G. 33; (1995) 139 S.J.L.B. 146; Times, June 8,
1995; Official Transcript; CA (Civ Div)
Mentioned by
Huish v Ellis
[1995] B.C.C. 462; [1995] N.P.C. 3; QBD
Mentioned by
Elguzouli-Daf v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
[1995] Q.B. 335; [1995] 2 W.L.R. 173; [1995] 1 All E.R. 833; (1995)
7 Admin. L.R. 421; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 151; Times, November 23,
1994; CA (Civ Div)
Mentioned by
Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd (No.1)
[1995] 2 A.C. 145; [1994] 3 W.L.R. 761; [1994] 3 All E.R. 506; [1994]
2 Lloyd's Rep. 468; [1994] C.L.C. 918; (1994) 144 N.L.J. 1204;
Times, July 26, 1994; Independent, August 3, 1994; HL
Mentioned by
E (A Minor) v Dorset CC
[1994] 3 W.L.R. 853; [1994] 4 All E.R. 640; [1995] 1 F.C.R. 1; 92
L.G.R. 484; (1994) 144 N.L.J. 755; Times, May 4, 1994;
Independent, May 4, 1994; CA (Civ Div)
Journal Articles
Acts speak louder than statements, or nine into one will go.
Cargo owners; Classification societies; Duty of care; Foreseeability;
Seaworthiness.
M.L.R. 1995, 58(4), 574-585
The duty of care after Caparo
Cargo owners; Classification societies; Duty of care; Foreseeability;
Seaworthiness.
S.L. Rev. 1995, 14(Spr), 58-59,
Classification societies and their duty of care - a further
change.
Cargo owners; Classification societies; Duty of care; Foreseeability;
Surveys.
BLG Ins. Law Q. 1994, 17, 20-21
Negligence - under control and under contract?
Cargo owners; Duty of care; Foreseeability; Surveyors.
C.L.J. 1994, 53(2), 220-223
Court of Appeal decides there is no difference in negligence
cases between physical damage to the plaintiff or his property
Page8
Books
Page9