Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 34

The Large Underground Xenon (LUX) Dark Matter Experiment

www.luxdarkmatter.org

Carlos Hernandez Faham


Brown University

BNL Forum, May 27 2010

If you only have 30 seconds...

LUX
Large Underground Xenon
Ultra-low background, 350 kg liquid xenon time-projection chamber Aims to directly detect the (potentially) rare interactions between WIMPs and us To be deployed underground at SUSEL (Homestake mine in SD) in 2011 Its big: in less than 2 days, it will surpass all current limits set today

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

Brown
Richard Gaitskell Simon Fiorucci Monica Pangilinan Luiz de Viveiros Jeremy Chapman Carlos Hernandez Faham David Malling James Verbus PI, Professor Postdoc Postdoc Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student

XENON10, CDMS

The LUX Collaboration


Formed in 2007, fully funded DOE/NSF in 2008

Case Western
Thomas Shutt Dan Akerib Mike Dragowsky Carmen Carmona Ken Clark Karen Gibson Adam Bradley Patrick Phelps Chang Lee

SNO, Borexino, XENON10, CDMS PI, Professor Professor Research Associate Professor Postdoc Postdoc Postdoc Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student

Harvard
Masahiro Morii Michal Wlasenko Professor Postdoc

BABAR, ATLAS

SD School of Mines
Xinhua Bai Mark Hanardt Professor Graduate Student

IceCube

University of Rochester
Frank Wolfs Udo Shroeder Wojtek Skutski Jan Toke Eryk Druszkiewicz Professor Professor Senior Scientist Senior Scientist Graduate Student

ZEPLIN II

Lawrence Berkeley
Bob Jacobsen Kevin Lesko Yuen-Dat Chan Brian Fujikawa Mia Ihm Professor Senior Physicist Scientist Scientist Graduate Student

SNO, KamLAND

Texas A&M
James White Robert Webb Rachel Mannino Tyana Stiegler Clement Sofka Professor Professor Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student

ZEPLIN II

U. South Dakota
DongMing Mei Wengchang Xiang Chao Zhang Jason Spaans Xiaoyi Yang

Majorana, CLEAN-DEAP

Lawrence Livermore
Adam Bernstein Dennis Carr Kareem Kazkaz Peter Sorensen

XENON10

UC Davis
Mani Tripathi Robert Svoboda Richard Lander Britt Hollbrook John Thomson Matthew Szydagis Jeremy Mock Melinda Sweany Nick Walsh Michael Woods

Double Chooz, CMS Professor Professor Professor Senior Engineer Engineer Postdoc Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student Graduate Student

Professor Postdoc Postdoc Graduate Student Graduate Student

PI, Leader of Adv. Detectors Group Senior Engineer Staff Physicist Postdoc

Yale
Daniel McKinsey James Nikkel Sidney Cahn Alexey Lyashenko Ethan Bernard Louis Kastens Nicole Larsen

XENON10, CLEAN-DEAP Professor Research Scientist Research Scientist Postdoc Postdoc Graduate Student Graduate Student

University of Maryland
Carter Hall Douglas Leonard Professor Postdoc

EXO

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

The Motivation
WIMPs?

Dark Matter
5% 25% Dark Matter

Us

BBN
70%

Supernovae Ia

Dark Energy

Rotation Curves
Dark Matter as Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) Cross-sections of order of weak scale give good estimate of current relic density Independently, SUSY predicts a massive, weakly interacting particle
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010 Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

CMB

G. Lensing
5

Dark Matter: Direct Detection


Local Milky Way DM density

Found it!

TeV is far, far away

High-energy physicists:

0.3 GeV cm 3

Assume Maxwell-Boltzman DM velocity distribution

dN e ER /(E0 r ) F 2 (ER ) I dER E0 r

I A2
L. De Viveiros

(for S.I. interactions)

Low-energy threshold is vital

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

The Plan
The LUX Detection Mechanism

Xenon Signal

Electron Recoil

Two signals:

S1

S2
--- eeee- ee- - - ee ee ee- - eee

175 nm photons

Electrons

Electron Recoil

Nuclear Recoil
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Nuclear Recoil

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

Photomultiplier Tube Gas Xe Liquid Xe Anode Grid

E
Cathode Grid

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

S1

e-e-e-e-e-e e -ee

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

10

top hit pattern: x-y localization

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

S2

e-e-e-e- e-e-e e-e

t : z localization

11

The LUX Experiment


Thermosyphon Titanium Vessels

PMT Holder Copper Plates Dodecagonal eld cage + PTFE reector panels

350 kg LXe detector 122 PMTs (2 round) Low-background Ti cryostat PTFE reector cage Thermosyphon used for cooling (>1 kW)
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010 Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

2 Hamamatsu R8778 Photomultiplier Tubes (PMTs)


12

The Challenge
Backgrounds

The Challenge: Backgrounds


(Just to give you an idea) Ambient radioactivity: ~100 evts/kg/s Human gamma activity: ~10,000 gammas/s Ellis: What happens if I put a cat in the detector? - Just dont do it Walls (U/Th/K): Concrete: 25/5.5/640 Bq/kg Rhyolite rock: 100/45/900 Bq/kg U/Th/K radioactivity is everywhere! Muons at sea level: 1/hand/s (50 Hz with >300 MeV deposited in LUX at sea level)

Wh

at W

IMP

WIMP

Were looking for a few events/100kg/year!

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

14

The Tricks
Underground / Self-shielding / Discrimination / Water shield / Material Selection

The Tricks: Underground Operation

~1 / hand / s

~1 / hand / months
LUX
Shhh... its quiet underground

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

16

The Tricks: Xenon Self-shielding

10 kg
Its quiet in the middle
LUX Goal

300 kg

LXe is a dense target at 3 g/cc Self-shielding allows this technology to greatly benet from scaling up
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010 Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

17

The Tricks: Discrimination

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

18

The Tricks: Water Shield

Water shield: 8m by 6m tank with 300 tonnes of water Reduces gamma background by 10-10 Reduces high-energy (>10 MeV) neutrons by 10-3 Water tank is active (Cerenkov), with 20 8-inch veto PMTs, which further reduces external backgrounds
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

nternal bg I

External bg

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

19

The Tricks: Material Screening and Contaminant Reduction


PMTs 10/2/65 mBq/PMT (U/Th/K) and 2 n/year/PMT However, multiply by x122 and consider the fact that they are right next to the active region... They are the dominant source of internal background In 30,000 kg-days, in ducial region and in 5-25 keVr , all PMTs would contribute: 0.5 gamma events 0.1 neutron events Titanium Cryostat Very low radioactivity: <0.4 mBq/kg U+Th Largely subdominant Rn Cleanroom reduces levels to < 40 Bq/m3. Minimize exposure, increase airow Kr Present in commercial Xe at ppm level. Reduced to <2 ppt with charcoal column separation PTFE

PMT
More radioactive Less radioactive

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

20

The LUX Program


LUX0.1 - CWRU LUX - Surface LUX - Underground

2007-2009
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

2010
Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

2011+
21

Past: LUX0.1 at Case Western


Surface run at Case Western Reserve
University during 2007-2009

Full assembly of LUX subsystems:


Cryogenics Recirculation Slow control & safety systems Electronics chain PMT mounts and resistor-chain bases Analysis software

50 kg Xe total mass (260 kg Aluminum

ller displacer) 4 PMT operation, 5 cm active Xe region

Very encouraging milestones: Achieved electron drift length > 2 m


(purication rate with 9 hr e-folding) Gamma and neutron calibrations
The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

22

Present: LUX at the Sanford Surface Facility


The dress rehearsal
Full-scale LUX assembly and deployment Duplicate of the underground layout Smaller water tank (3 m) Cleanroom class 1,000 (will be relocated underground) LUX operations since November 2009

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

23

Very near future: LUX Underground (Davis Cavern)

LUX
Majora na
4850 ft level

0.2 km
Two story, dedicated LUX 55 x 30 x 32 facility

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

24

Projected Sensitivity
Cross section [cm ] (normalised to nucleon)
10
42 http://dmtools.brown.edu/ Gaitskell,Mandic,Filippini

10

43

CDMS 2009

XENON100 (161 kg-days)

10

44

SuperCDMS 2-ST

10

45

XENON100 (6,000 kg-days)

10

46

LUX (30,000 kg-days)


100504200101

10

10 WIMP Mass [GeV/c2]


Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

10

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

25

Thank you

Extra Slides

LUX Dark Matter Signal


Simulated WIMP Signal ( mWIMP = 100 GeV/c ;
2 2 = 2.1e 45 cm ; 3e4 kg day ) WN

3.5 3
log10 ( S2/S1 )

2.5 2 1.5
2009 Apr 14 01:06:21 L. De Viveiros

1 0

5 10 15 S1 [keVee] (2.2 phe/keVee)


Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

20

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

28

Why WIMPs?

= n < A v >= H

(0.1pb)c 2 h < Av >

0.2
For < A v >~ 1pb c

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

29

Xenon Signal Generation

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

30

LUX0.1 at Case Western: Pulses


LUX 0.1 Event (Summed across all channels)

150

S2
phe/sample

4543 phe

100

50

S1
52.8 phe

0 0
S1

10 s 60

15
S2

20

10
phe/sample

40 20

0 0.5 0 s

0 0.5 17

18 s

19
J. Chapman 01 Oct 2009 Brown Particle Astrophysics

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

31

LUX0.1 at Case Western: LXe Purity


Comparison of Electron Drift Lengths for Different Xe Purity Levels 5 4.5 4
log10(S2) [phe]

3.5 3
phe/s

10 8 S2 Pulse 6 4 2 S1 Pulse

2.5 2 1.5
efolding drift length: 0.1810.001 cm efolding drift length: 12.40.9 cm

0 0

Electron Drift Time 5 10 15

Time [s]

0.5

1.5

2 2.5 3 3.5 Electron Drift Length [cm]

4.5

5.5

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

32

LUX0.1 at Case Western: LXe Purity


Purification vs. Time, Run009

Electron Drift Length [m]

10

~9 hr purication time constant at 20 slpm (LUX will run at 50 slpm) > 2 m electron drift length This is an order of magnitude faster recirculation than ever achieved before

10

10 0 20 2 error bars 1 error bars 40 60 80 100 Recirculation Time [hours] 120

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

33

LUX0.1 at Case Western: Energy Calibrations

The LUX Experiment, May 27 2010

Carlos Hernandez Faham, Brown University

34

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi