Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Dr Bill Andrews
Dept of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Royal Military College of Canada Andrews-w@rmc.ca (613) 541-6000 ext. 6052
Dr Kevin Jaansalu
Dept of Metallurgical & Materials Engineering Montana Tech (University of Montana) kjaansalu@mtech.edu (406) 496-4305
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
Canada
Outline
Research goal Basic principles of TBX Experimental set-up Secondary combustion Fragment mass results Fragment velocity results Conclusions Future work
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
Research Goal
Fuel-rich detonation
Experimental Charge
Detonator
140 mm
102 mm
Booster
TBX
6 mm casing
PMR-2A
Trial Variables
Explosives TBX 1, 2, 3 C4 (baseline) Wall thickness 3.8 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, and 9.5 mm Casing material 1026 steel Ductile cast iron (DCI)
6 mm casing
102 mm
TBX formulations
TBX 1 Monopropellant and magnesium particles TBX 2 Nitromethane and aluminium (60/40 %wt) TBX 3 Monopropellant, aluminium and RDX
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
Witness Packs
Secondary Combustion
Software converts hole size and depth of penetration to mass and velocity Mass distribution results were compared to literature values The average velocities were compared to other methods.
10
C4 (1026 steel) TBX 1 (1026 steel) TBX 2 (1026 steel) TBX 3 (1026 steel) TNT (PMR-2A) TBX 1 (Ductile cast iron) TBX 1 (Grey cast iron)
0 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
X-ray Images
TBX 1, 3.8 mm, 1026 steel, 100s TBX 1, 6 mm, ductile cast iron, 100s
M 1 v = 2E + C 2
2 E = Gurney constant
1 2
SplitX Gurney-based computer code that considers: End confinement Shock wave interaction and propagation User-controlled geometry
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
X-ray images (+/- 50) 1400 --1000 800 800 750 --1000
Conclusions
TBXs are capable of fragmenting metal casings: Fragment mass distributions were consistent with literature values; and Fragment velocities were well predicted using means that assume an instantaneous release of detonation energy.
Future Work
Determine how the casing thickness and material disrupt the TBX shock wave. Sacrificing the thermobaric effect to have fragments Determine how the fragmentation trends of the base explosives are altered by the additives. Run trials with pure NM, and with silicon as an additive Determine why the casing material appears to have little effect on fragment velocity. High strain rate failure and gas dynamics problem
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
Acknowledgements
DRDC Valcartier Weapons Effects Section Y. Baillargeon for witness pack support DRDC Suffield (funding) Neutralization and Protection Group R. Fall for Mine Effects Site assistance Threat Assessment Group T. Storrie for Flash X-ray Site assistance P. Lambert for mixing the explosives Dr. J. Anderson for scientific support
QUESTIONS ?
Defence R&D Canada R & D pour la dfense Canada
End of Presentation
Follow-on Slides
Material 1026 1026 1026 1026 1026 1026 1026 DCI GCI 1026 1026 1026 1026 GCI
Average mass (g) 2.3 2.8 3.7 3.0 6.7 9.9 11.0 3.8 1.3 1.8 5.6 7.3 4.7 2.1
Max velocity (m/s) 1750 1400 1200 1000 800 650 550 800 750 1200 970 850 1000
Energy (J) 3500 2700 2700 1500 2100 2100 1700 1200 370 1300 2600 2600 2400 340
Number of fragments 180 240 260 140 100 100 110 220 670 230 120 130 150 740
570
Mo N(m) = e 2 2MK
t M K = Bt d 1 + d
5 6 1 3
250
200
150
100
50
10
15
20
R & D pour la dfense Canada
800
Velocity (m/s)
600
400
6 mm 3.8 mm
200