Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
February 9, 2012
Apollo Tyres
Performance Highlights
Y/E March - Consolidated (` cr) Net sales EBITDA EBITDA margin (%) Adjusted PAT
Source: Company, Angel Research
BUY
CMP Target Price
% chg (yoy) Angel est. 36.3 18.7 (149)bp 5.8 2,900 246 8.5 78 % diff. 11.3 31.6 155bp 63.2
`76 `88
12 Months
3QFY12 3QFY11 3,228 324 10.0 127 2,369 273 11.5 120
Investment Period
Stock Info Sector Market Cap (` cr) Beta 52 Week High / Low Avg. Daily Volume Face Value (`) BSE Sensex Nifty Reuters Code Bloomberg Code
Strong consolidated performance: For 3QFY2012, Apollo Tyres (APTY) reported strong net sales growth of 36.3% yoy (12.4% qoq), led by an 18.2% yoy (8.3% qoq) increase in volumes and 15.3% yoy (3.8% qoq) growth in net average realization. Top-line growth was led by strong performance in India, Europe and South Africa, which posted revenue growth of 46.2%, 26.3% and 27.9% yoy, respectively. EBITDA margin expanded by 202bp sequentially to 10%, benefitting from lower raw-material costs and higher profitability in Europe in a seasonally strong quarter. As a result, adjusted net profit grew by 63.8% qoq to `127cr. During the quarter, APTY made a provision of `29cr in relation to a penalty following the settlement agreement with South Africa Competition Commission for its operations in South Africa. Better-than-expected standalone performance, driven by volume growth: APTYs standalone net sales grew strongly by 46.2% yoy (13.5% qoq) to `2,093cr, led by volume growth of 24% yoy (10.2% qoq) and net average realization growth of 17.9% yoy (2.9% qoq). EBITDA margin for the quarter improved by 123bp qoq to 8%, driven by the decline in raw-material expenses; but the benefits were limited due to higher proportion of OEM sales during the quarter. However, net profit grew substantially by 92.9% qoq to `43cr, largely led by improvement in operating margin. Outlook and valuation: We revise upwards our volume estimates for FY2012/13E for standalone entity, driven by better-than-expected volume growth in 3QFY2012 and likely pick-up in demand going ahead. We have also raised our margin expectations to factor in moderation in natural rubber prices. We expect the company to deliver a strong revenue CAGR of 23.7% over FY201113E, led by production ramp-up at Chennai facility and robust growth in European subsidiary. We expect the companys operating margin to improve in FY2013E on account of the gradual softening of raw-material prices. At `76, APTY is trading at attractive levels of 6.9x FY2013E earnings. We maintain our Buy rating on the stock with a target price of `88, valuing it at 8.0x FY2013E earnings.
Shareholding Pattern (%) Promoters MF / Banks / Indian Fls FII / NRIs / OCBs Indian Public / Others 46.4 19.7 23.2 10.7
3m 2.7 27.2
1yr 1.4
3yr 86.0
62.9 345.4
FY2010 8,121 62.6 653 369.5 14.6 13.0 5.8 1.9 29.8 29.3 0.6 4.4
FY2011 8,868 9.2 441 (32.5) 11.1 8.7 8.6 1.6 17.0 15.7 0.7 6.2
FY2012E 12,061 36.0 405 (8.0) 9.2 8.0 9.4 1.4 13.5 14.1 0.5 5.7
FY2013E 13,580 12.6 556 37.0 10.2 11.0 6.9 1.2 30.8 16.5 0.5 4.5
Yaresh Kothari
022-3935 7800 Ext: 6844 yareshb.kothari@angelbroking.com
3QFY12 2,093 1,547 73.9 96 4.6 63 3.0 220 10.5 1,926 168 8.0 61 47 0 60 60 2.9 17 28.8 43 2.0 50.4 0.8
3QFY11 1,432 940 65.6 78 5.4 53 3.7 213 14.8 1,283 149 10.4 43 37 3 72 72 5.0 18 24.9 54 3.8 50.4 1.1
% chg 46.2 64.5 22.9 19.9 3.6 50.1 12.6 41 28 (84.0) (16.7) (16.7) (4.0) (21.0)
9MFY12 5,899 4,362 73.9 274 4.6 185 3.1 628 10.7 5,450 449 7.6 166 134 3 152 152 2.6 43 28.2 109 1.8 50.4
9MFY11 3,729 2,434 65.3 232 6.2 112 3.0 564 15.1 3,342 387 10.4 106 109 10 183 183 4.9 51 27.8 132 3.5 50.4 2.6
% chg 58.2 79.2 18.0 65.5 11.4 63.1 16.0 57.7 23.0 (72.4) (16.8) (16.8) (15.6) (17.3)
(21.0)
2.2
(17.3)
Net sales up 46.2% yoy on a 24% yoy increase in volumes: On a standalone basis, APTY registered strong top-line growth of 46.2% yoy to `2,093cr, backed by a robust 24% yoy (10.2% qoq) increase in volumes and a 17.9% (2.9% qoq) increase in net average realization. Product mix continues to favor the OEM segment due to increasing supplies of truck and bus radial (TBR) tyres from Chennai facility. During 3QFY2012, the replacement segment contributed 57% to the companys top line, while contribution of OEM and exports stood at 33% and 10%, respectively.
February 9, 2012
(%) 80.0 70.0 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 0.0 (10.0) (20.0)
3QFY10
4QFY10
1QFY11
2QFY11
3QFY11
4QFY11
1QFY12
2QFY12
Operating margin improves sequentially to 8%: APTY reported a 123bp yoy expansion in operating margin to 8%, driven largely by easing raw-material cost pressures, primarily natural rubber. While average natural rubber cost declined by 10.8% sequentially, cost of other raw materials such as NTC and carbon black moved up due to INR depreciation. Raw material to net sales ratio witnessed a 100bp contraction sequentially and stood at 73.9%. However, margin growth was restricted due to unfavorable product mix (in favor of OEM).
3QFY12
3QFY10
4QFY10
1QFY11
2QFY11
3QFY11
4QFY11
1QFY12
2QFY12
3QFY10
4QFY10
1QFY11
2QFY11
3QFY11
4QFY11
1QFY12
2QFY12
3QFY12
February 9, 2012
3QFY12
Standalone net profit increases substantially by 92.9% qoq: Led by strong top-line growth and improvement in operating margin, standalone net profit registered a significant 92.9% qoq jump to `43cr. However, on a yoy basis, it declined by 21% on account of contraction in operating margin and higher interest (up 41% yoy) and depreciation expense (up 28% yoy), led by ramping up of Chennai facility. Exhibit 6: Net profit jumps by 92.9% sequentially
(` cr) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 3.6 3.2 3.8 3.8 2.3 1.2 2.0 7.7 Net profit 8.8 Net profit margin (RHS) (%) 10.0 9.0 8.0 7.0 6.0 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0
3QFY10
4QFY10
1QFY11
2QFY11
3QFY11
4QFY11
1QFY12
2QFY12
February 9, 2012
3QFY12
3QFY12 3QFY11 3,228 2,011 62.3 351 10.9 138 4.3 404 12.5 2,904 324 10.0 73 82 3 172 29 143 4.4 44.4 31.1 0 (0) 98 127 3.9 50.4 1.9 2.5 2,369 1,255 53.0 313 13.2 137 5.8 392 16.5 2,096 273 11.5 53 67 5 158 158 6.7 37 23.6 0 0 120 120 5.1 50.4 2.4 2.4
% chg 9MFY12 9MFY11 36.3 60.3 12.3 0.9 3.0 38.6 18.7 38.2 22.3 (34) 9.0 (9.6) 19.3 8,922 5,488 61.5 1,033 11.6 456 5.1 1,150 12.9 8,127 795 8.9 200 235 17 376 29 347 3.9 93 26.8 1 0 (18.6) 5.8 253 282 3.2 50.4 (18.6) 5.8 5.0 5.6 6,138 3,229 52.6 905 14.7 332 5.4 1,015 16.5 5,481 657 10.7 131 198 9 337 337 5.5 89 26.3 0 0 248 248 4.0 50.4 4.9 4.9
% chg 45.3 70.0 14.1 37.3 13.3 48.3 21.0 53.1 18.8 92.1 11.7 3.0 4.7
2.0 13.8
2.0 13.8
Consolidated performance: APTY registered better-than-expected 36.3% yoy (12.4% qoq) growth in its consolidated net revenue to `3,228cr, aided by 18.2% yoy (8.3% qoq) growth in volumes to 130,000MT and 15.3% yoy (3.8% qoq) growth in average net realization. India, Europe and South Africa operations registered strong revenue growth of 46.2% (13.5% qoq), 26.3% (9.4% qoq) and 27.9% yoy (26.8% qoq), respectively, during the quarter. EBITDA margin expanded by 202bp sequentially to 10%, benefitting from lower raw-material costs and higher profitability in Europe in a seasonally strong quarter. Raw-material to net sales ratio stood at 66.6%, posting a decline of 100bp qoq. EBIT margin of the European subsidiary expanded by 513bp qoq to 15.7%, led by superior product and price mix. However, South African subsidiary registered loss of `29.6cr at the EBIT level due to the impact of penalty of ZAR45mn to be paid to South Africa Competition Commission as part of the settlement. Adjusted net profit grew strongly by 63.8% qoq to `127cr. However, on a yoy basis, adjusted net profit reported modest 5.8% yoy growth, largely due to contraction in operating margin (down 149bp yoy) and higher interest expense (up 38.2% to `73cr) during the quarter.
February 9, 2012
4.9 46.0 -
288 7 183 2
10.4 46.3 -
February 9, 2012
Investment arguments
Tyre industry set for a structural shift: Currently, manufacturing radial tyres is far more capital intensive than manufacturing cross-ply tyres. Investment required for radial tyres per tpd is 3.2x that of cross-ply tyres at `6.1cr/tpd. On the other hand, the selling price of radial tyres is ~20% higher than that of cross-ply tyres. Thus, to generate similar RoCE and RoE, tyre companies would need to earn EBITDA margin of ~21% compared to ~9% earned on cross-ply tyres, considering the difference in capital requirements and consequent impact on asset turnover, interest cost and depreciation. Therefore, higher capital requirements will help protect margins from upward-bound input costs, as the business model evolves bearing in mind final RoEs rather than margins. With the sector set for a structural shift and the apparent pricing flexibility, RoCE and RoE of tyre manufacturers are expected to improve going forward. Riding on high domestic demand: The Indian tyre industry is witnessing strong demand from the replacement as well as OEM markets, keeping capacities running at peak. APTY is poised to achieve market leadership on the back of increasing production from 820tpd in FY2010 to ~1,300tpd in FY2012E. Strategic overseas investment offers synergies in the long term: Acquisitions done by the company in the last two-three years are increasingly contributing to its revenue. We estimate Vredestein Banden combined with Dunlop SA to contribute close to 35% to the companys overall consolidated revenue, helping it to further strengthen its foothold in the Indian tyre industry. Acquisitions offer synergies by way of access to radial tyre technology, wider product portfolio and presence in newer geographies.
We remain positive on the tyre industry in view of the structural shift that the industry is witnessing and due to softening raw-material prices, mainly natural rubber. We expect the company to deliver a strong revenue CAGR of 23.7% over FY201113E, led by production ramp-up at Chennai facility and robust growth in European subsidiary. We expect the companys operating margin to improve in FY2013 on gradual softening of raw-material prices.
February 9, 2012
At `76, APTY is trading at attractive levels of 6.9x FY2013E earnings. We maintain our Buy rating on the stock with a target price of `88, valuing it at 8.0x FY2013E earnings. Key downside risks to our call: A sharp rise in input costs from current levels, slower growth in international business and lower-than-anticipated domestic replacement demand pose downside risks to our estimates.
FY13E 11.0
12,061 8.0
Dec-07
Jun-11 Jun-11
Mar-06
Apr-10
May-08
Dec-03
Mar-06
Aug-07
Nov-06
EV (`cr)
2.0
4.0
6.0
May-07
February 9, 2012
Nov-10
Oct-06
Feb-09
Feb-09
Sep-04
Jun-05
Apr-03
Oct-09
Apr-11
Jan-12
Sep-09
Jan-12
Jul-10
Jul-05
Jul-08
February 9, 2012
February 9, 2012
10
February 9, 2012
11
(517) (3,533)
(485) (3,417)
February 9, 2012
12
Key Ratios
Y/E March Valuation Ratio (x) P/E (on FDEPS) P/CEPS P/BV Dividend yield (%) EV/Sales EV/EBITDA EV / Total Assets Per Share Data (`) EPS (Basic) EPS (fully diluted) Cash EPS DPS Book Value DuPont Analysis EBIT margin Tax retention ratio Asset turnover (x) RoIC (Post-tax) Cost of Debt (Post Tax) Leverage (x) Operating RoE Returns (%) RoCE (Pre-tax) Angel RoIC (Pre-tax) RoE Turnover ratios (x) Asset Turnover (Gross Block) Inventory / Sales (days) Receivables (days) Payables (days) WC cycle (ex-cash) (days) Solvency ratios (x) Net debt to equity Net debt to EBITDA Interest Coverage (EBIT/Interest) 0.3 0.6 5.3 0.4 1.2 2.6 0.7 1.1 6.9 0.9 2.3 3.6 0.9 2.3 2.9 0.8 1.8 3.9 2.4 53 26 58 29 2.4 49 20 47 28 2.1 36 23 41 19 1.4 57 36 61 30 1.6 58 37 61 30 1.7 58 37 62 32 23.8 27.2 21.3 13.2 14.2 8.4 29.3 26.0 29.8 15.7 14.3 17.0 14.1 14.2 13.5 16.5 16.9 30.8 10.0 0.7 2.7 18.1 8.0 0.5 22.8 5.9 0.7 2.6 10.1 9.5 0.3 10.3 11.5 0.7 2.9 22.9 7.2 0.6 31.8 8.1 0.8 2.1 13.4 7.6 0.8 18.1 6.6 0.7 2.3 11.1 7.5 0.9 14.5 7.6 0.7 2.3 12.3 6.3 0.8 17.3 5.5 5.5 8.2 0.5 24.2 2.8 2.8 5.3 0.4 26.8 13.0 13.0 16.8 0.7 39.0 8.7 8.7 13.9 0.5 47.9 8.0 8.0 14.3 0.8 55.0 11.0 11.0 18.2 1.5 64.3 13.7 9.2 3.1 0.7 0.9 6.8 2.0 27.4 14.2 2.8 0.6 0.9 10.3 1.8 5.8 4.5 1.9 1.0 0.6 4.4 1.3 8.6 5.4 1.6 0.7 0.7 6.2 1.2 9.4 5.3 1.4 1.0 0.5 5.7 1.0 6.9 4.2 1.2 2.0 0.5 4.5 1.0 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12E FY13E
February 9, 2012
13
E-mail: research@angelbroking.com
Website: www.angelbroking.com
This document is solely for the personal information of the recipient, and must not be singularly used as the basis of any investment decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial advice. Each recipient of this document should make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of the companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult their own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such an investment. Angel Broking Limited, its affiliates, directors, its proprietary trading and investment businesses may, from time to time, make investment decisions that are inconsistent with or contradictory to the recommendations expressed herein. The views contained in this document are those of the analyst, and the company may or may not subscribe to all the views expressed within. Reports based on technical and derivative analysis center on studying charts of a stock's price movement, outstanding positions and trading volume, as opposed to focusing on a company's fundamentals and, as such, may not match with a report on a company's fundamentals. The information in this document has been printed on the basis of publicly available information, internal data and other reliable sources believed to be true, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied on as such, as this document is for general guidance only. Angel Broking Limited or any of its affiliates/ group companies shall not be in any way responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. Angel Broking Limited has not independently verified all the information contained within this document. Accordingly, we cannot testify, nor make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to the accuracy, contents or data contained within this document. While Angel Broking Limited endeavours to update on a reasonable basis the information discussed in this material, there may be regulatory, compliance, or other reasons that prevent us from doing so. This document is being supplied to you solely for your information, and its contents, information or data may not be reproduced, redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may seek to provide or have engaged in providing corporate finance, investment banking or other advisory services in a merger or specific transaction to the companies referred to in this report, as on the date of this report or in the past. Neither Angel Broking Limited, nor its directors, employees or affiliates shall be liable for any loss or damage that may arise from or in connection with the use of this information. Note: Please refer to the important `Stock Holding Disclosure' report on the Angel website (Research Section). Also, please refer to the latest update on respective stocks for the disclosure status in respect of those stocks. Angel Broking Limited and its affiliates may have investment positions in the stocks recommended in this report.
Disclosure of Interest Statement 1. Analyst ownership of the stock 2. Angel and its Group companies ownership of the stock 3. Angel and its Group companies' Directors ownership of the stock 4. Broking relationship with company covered
Apollo Tyres No No No No
Note: We have not considered any Exposure below ` 1 lakh for Angel, its Group companies and Directors.
Ratings (Returns) :
February 9, 2012
14