Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A Dissertation
by
Muna BuFaroosha
B.S. United Arab Emirates University, 1989
M.S. Michigan State University, 1995
August, 2002
Acknowledgment
This degree was my only dream and Dr. Maverick made it come true.
ii
Table of Contents
Acknowledgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
Lists of Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi
Lists of Figures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Chapter 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Metallization Technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Copper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Copper Metallization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.4 CVD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Precursors For Cu-CVD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 Cu(hfac)2(alcohol) Adducts As Precursors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.7 Cu(hfac)2(amine) Adducts As Precursors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.8 Tetrameric Copper(I)-Amide Clusters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
1.9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Chapter 2 Cu(hfac)2 Adducts With Amines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.2 Experimental . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.1 Synthesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2.1.1 General Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.2 Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.3 Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.2.4 Other Amine Adducts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.5 Characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
2.2.6 CVD Reactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3 Results And Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.3.1 Thermodynamic Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.3.2 Synthesis And Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.3.3 CVD Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.3.3.1 Cu(hfac)2(H2O) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.3.3.2 Amine Adducts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.3.4 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2.3.5 Film Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.3.6 Adhesion Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.7 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
iii
iv
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Features Of Representative Copper Precursors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Table 2.1 CVD Of Cu(hfac)2 With NH3 As The Carrier Gas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Table 2.2 Elemental Analysis Of Cu(hfac)2(amine) Adducts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Table 2.3 Crystal Data Collection Parameters For Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine) And
Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
Table 2.4 Film Thickness And Resistivity Of One Cu Film Deposited
From Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) Under Hydrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Table 2.5 Enthalpies Of Dehydrogenation Of Some Amines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Table 2.6 CVD Results Under H2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 2.7 CVD Results Under N2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Table 2.8 Adhesion Test Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
Table 3.1 Crystal Data And Collection Parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Table 3.2 Elemental Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Table 3.3 CVD Results Using Cu(hfac)2(i-PrOH) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Table 4.1 Crystal Data For [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Table 4.2 Luminescence Of Cu(I) Tetramers and their Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
Table 4.3 Estimated 8em max For Phosphorescence (nm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Table 4.4 Structural Parameters Of Cu(I) Amido Tetramers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Table 4.5 Solid State Emission Maxima . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
vi
List of Figures
Figure 1.1 PVD (right) Has Limited Conformal Coverage Compared to
CVD (left) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Figure 1.2 Schematic Diagram Of A Damascene Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Figure 1.3 CVD Process Steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Figure 1.4 Structure Of Cu(hfac)(tmvs) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Figure 1.5 The Structure Of Cu(II) $-diketonates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Figure 2.1 Precursors For Copper CVD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Figure 2.2 ORTEP Drawing Of Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Figure 2.3 ORTEP Drawing Of Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
Figure 2.4 Depiction Of Cu CVD Film Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Figure 3.1 ORTEP Drawing Of [Et3NH][(hfac)2Cu(:-OH)Cu(hfac)2] . . . . . . . . 34
Figure 3.2 ORTEP Drawing Of (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3].H2O . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Figure 3.3 ORTEP Drwing Of The Dianion [Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2]-2 From
The Structure Of (quinuclidinium)[Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Figure 3.4 ORTEP Drawing Of
trans-(hfac)2Cu(CF3COCH=C(CF3)CH=CHN(i-Pr)2)2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Figure 3.5 ORTEP Drawing Of [(hfac)Cu(:3-OCH2CH(OH)CH3)]4 . . . . . . . . . 39
Figure 3.6 The Delocalized Structure Of
2,4-dichloro-1-diethylamino-3,5-diphenyl-1,3-pentadien-5-one . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Figure 3.7 Cubane Structure Of [(hfac)Cu(:3-OR]4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Figure 4.1 ORTEP Drawing of [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Figure 4.2 The Separation Between Cu...Cu is Affected by the Ligand Type. . . 59
Figure 4.3 MO Diagram for [CuN(SiH3)]4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
vii
viii
Abstract
The main objective of this study was to synthesize precursors that are capable of
producing copper films of high quality by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). We
investigated some copper(I) and copper(II) complexes as precursors for chemical or
photochemical vapor deposition.
In chapter 2, we synthesized a series of Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts, where hfac is
hexafluoroacetylacetonate and the amines are: dimethylamine, isopropylamine,
allylamine, pyrrolidine, and piperidine. The efficiency of these adducts compared to
Cu(hfac)2(H2O) as Cu-CVD precursors was examined under hydrogen. We found that
among these amine adducts, Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2 gave the best deposition rate under
hydrogen. Their capability as self reducing precursors was tested under the inert gas
nitrogen. All the amine adducts in this study deposited copper films under nitrogen,
which demonstrated their ability as self reducing precursors. All the amine adducts
except Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2 exhibited square pyramidal geometry where the hfac
ligand twists out of the plane permitting one of the CuO bonds to take the apical
position.
Chapter 3 summarizes the reactions of Cu(hfac)2 and certain amines which
resulted in compounds with formulas other than Cu(hfac)2L. Here we learned that the
reaction between Cu(hfac)2 and NEt3 does not afford the adduct Cu(hfac)2(NEt3) as
reported in the literature. The species that we were able to isolate from this reaction
indicate that this reaction is not a simple adduct formation but possibly proceeds via
proton transfer. In general we concluded from the work presented in this chapter that
ix
Chapter 1
Introduction
Recently, copper chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has received great
recognition in the industrial and academic area. This attention arose as the result of the
need for new interconnect materials that could overcome limitations that had been
attributed to aluminum (Al), the currently used interconnect material. For some time
now, our research group has been studying the development of new copper containing
metallization materials.
What follows here is a general background description of copper CVD along
with a brief description of the current technologies and techniques utilized in this area
of ongoing research.
1.1 Metallization Technology
Metals are used to connect the miniature components on silicon wafers in
integrated circuits (ICs). These interconnects both supply power and transmit
information.1.1 Technological advances in the area of submicron IC device fabrication
have created the need for the industry to design downscaled devices,1.2 among which are
dynamic random access memory (DRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), and
electrically erasable and programmable read only memory (EEPROM).1.3
The physical and chemical properties of aluminum (Al) are compatible with
large scale integration (LSI) processing. This has enabled the industry to widely use
aluminum or aluminum alloy as the interconnect materials in LSI circuits. For example,
aluminum is an inexpensive material with low electrical resistivity (2.7 S cm), and it
forms a thin protective oxide film that withstands the various thermal processes that
take place during circuit fabrication. The reliability of aluminum, nonetheless, poses a
major concern for maintaining the total reliability of advanced LSI. In essence, the low
melting point of aluminum (660 C) makes it prone to stress-induced voidage and
electromigration, which can lead to failure of the interconnect. The speed at which
these forms of failure occur is increased by decreasing the width and thickness of the
interconnects. As a result, industrial applications of Al interconnects may be limited for
ICs with feature sizes below 0.25 :m.1.2,1.4
Improved LSI performance and reliability require wiring manufactured from
materials that have lower resistivity and higher resistance to electromigration than Al
alloys. Gold, copper, and silver have lower resistivity than Al and thus are candidate
wiring materials. However, these three metals cannot be used in direct contact with
silicon (Si), primarily because all three form deep levels in the bandgap of silicon,
which interferes with transistor performance. While silver (Ag) displays severe
migration problems, both gold and copper exhibit similar material properties and
processing problems. Gold films with low resistivities made by hydrogen plasmaassisted CVD have been achieved. The lower resistivity of copper, nonetheless, is an
advantage compared with gold. Even though some ICs already contain copper
interconnects, industry will continue to use both aluminum (Al) and tungsten (W) for
local interconnects, the latter because of its high electromigration resistance which
offsets its higher electrical resistivity.1.3
1.2 Copper
To overcome the limitations imposed by aluminum interconnects, and since
copper has a higher melting point (1085 C) and lower resistivity (1.67 S cm) than
aluminum, copper wiring technology is now being adopted as an interconnect
material.1.4
Electromigration can be defined as the motion of atoms in a metallic conductor
caused by the passage of current. Atoms move in the direction of the electron drift
causing the cathodic end of the wire to be consumed. This can lead to such damage as
openings in the lines or shorts to adjacent lines. This damage is made worse by
inhomogeneity in the interconnect, which leads to excessive local heating.1.5,1.6
For the same size of interconnect, the time to failure by copper electromigration
is approximately two orders of magnitude higher than that of aluminum. The amount of
time that it takes for a circuit to fail is dependent on current density. Therefore, the
maximum allowable current density of copper (105 A/cm2) is about two orders of
magnitude higher than that of aluminum.1.3
1.3 Copper Metallization
There are major challenges in the implementation of copper in actual silicon LSI
devices. Copper is not compatible with some of the other materials used in ICs. For
example, copper readily diffuses into silicon dioxide and silicon substrates under the
high temperatures reached in device manufacture. At deposition temperatures, copper
may interact with silicon which may result in the formation of copper silicides and
copper-doped silicon. Additionally, in the standard metallization procedure, plasma
etching is applied to remove excess aluminum. However, the etching rate of copper
using this method is too slow. Confronting these challenges requires three things:
finding a method of deposition, patterning the metal, and finding a suitable barrier
material that prevents copper from diffusing into SiO2 and Si.1.5
Several metal deposition techniques have been explored, such as electroplating,
physical vapor deposition (PVD), and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). Electroplating
is a two-step method. It requires a seed layer deposition preceding the plating fill step to
insure a low-resistance conductor for the plating current and to assist in the film
nucleation.
In PVD, atoms or small groups of atoms are produced by the evaporation of a
solid or molten source. These atoms are then carried in a low pressure gas phase, and
deposited on the wafers. Uniformity and step coverage are issues in PVD. Conformal
coverage can be defined as the degree to which the film covers both vertical and
horizontal surfaces. The nature of the PVD method causes this problem (i.e. poor
conformal coverage). For example, there are fewer gas-phase collisions between the
source and the wafer and almost no surface reactions. Thus, the species can get in
perpendicular to the wafer from the source and stay where they arrive without desorption
and redeposition.1.7, 1.8, 1.9
Among the above metal fill methods, CVD has important advantages that can be
useful in sub-0.25 :m devices. While PVD delivers atoms or small groups of atoms to
the substrate surface, CVD carries molecules. These molecules can adsorb/desorb or
diffuse on the evolving film many times before they decompose and further film growth.
Consequently, more uniform films are formed and conformal coverage is more likely
with CVD (see Fig.1.1).1.9
Thin Film
Substrate
Substrate
CVD
PVD
T iN
o x id e
o x id e
Cu CVD
Cu
Cu
P o lis h
o x id e
o x id e
Precursor
H2
byproduct
Substrate
F 3C
O
Cu
O
SiMe3
F 3C
Cu(hfac)2
Cu(hfac)(vtms)
From
solid
liquid
Decomposition
at > 200 C
at > 40 C
Vapor pressure
10 torr at 100C
0.3 torr at 40 C
Reducing agent
required
not required
disadvantages
In general Cu(II) precursors require a reducing agent for deposition (Eq. (1.2))
while Cu(I) precursors can deposit pure copper films without the use of a reducing agent
(eq. (1.3)).1.12
Cu(hfac)2 + H2
2(hfac)Cu(L)
Cu(s) + 2 Hhfac
Cu(s) + Cu(hfac)2(g) + 2L (g)
1.2
1.3
The most studied Cu(II) precursors for Cu-CVD are Cu(II) $-diketonates, and Fig. 1.5
shows some representative examples.
R'
R = R' = CH3
R = CH3
R' = CF3
R = R' = CF3
R = C(CH3)3 R' = n-C3F7
O
Cu
O
acac
tfac
hfac
fod
R'
hfacH(g)
1.4
A noticeable improvement in the growth rate under lower CVD temperature was
obtained when water vapor was used as co-reactant in Cu-CVD from Cu(hfac)2 under
H2.1.15 Lecohier et al.1.16 showed that when water was used in combination with
Cu(hfac)2 as precursor for Cu-CVD, the deposition rate increased with the amount of
added water vapor. Cho added alcohols such as isopropyl alcohol, methanol, and
isobutyl alcohol as co-reactants with Cu(hfac)2 and H2.1.17 This study demonstrated that
9
these additives lowered the reduction temperatures and increased the growth rates.
It seems that these protic co-reactants participate in the CVD reaction by
transferring a proton from the additive (R= H or alkyl group) to hfac as illustrated in the
following equations:1.18
ROH
hfac(ads) + ROH
RO(ads) + H(ads)
1.5
RO(ads) + hfacH(g)
1.6
Since the adsorbed hfac displays some anionic character, eq. 1.6 is basically an
acid-base reaction.
Kaloyeros conducted a study to investigate the role of alcohols (EtOH, i-PrOH,
and s-BuOH) in plasma CVD reactions. This study showed that these alcohols supplied
atomic hydrogen. This contribution facilitates the Cu(hfac)2 reduction and leads to
greater hydrogen-precursor interaction and, thus, higher copper growth rate.1.19
In our laboratory Cu(hfac)2(alcohol) adducts have been investigated as precursors
for Cu-CVD. The capacity of these alcohols to act as reducing agents as well as their
ability to transfer a proton makes them good candidates. Furthermore, alcohol adducts
with low melting points, such as Cu(hfac)2(i-PrOH) (m.p 50-53 oC),1.20 may be easier to
introduce into a CVD reactor.
The study of a series Cu(hfac)2(ROH), where ROH = C1, C2, C3, and C4
alcohols, showed that some of the alcohols can improve the copper deposition rate.
Cu(hfac)2(i-PrOH) was found to be the most practical precursor for Cu-CVD.
The growth rate using this precursor was 1.3 0.5 :m/hr under nitrogen as the carrier
10
gas, which is about three times greater than Cu(hfac)2 with hydrogen as the carrier gas
under the same conditions. On the other hand, this study showed that an excess of
alcohol vapor is needed during the CVD run in order to keep the adduct stable.1.20
1.7 Cu(hfac)2(amine) Adducts As Precursors
The Lewis acidity of Cu(II) in Cu(II) $-diketonates stems from the presence of
fluorinated $-diketonate ligands which are strongly electron withdrawing, lowering
electron density on the metal. For example, Cu(acac)2(pyridine) is unstable and loses the
pyridine ligand readily when exposed to air. Cu(hfac)2(pyridine), on the other hand, is
stable in air.1.21
Replacing the alcohols with amines seems to be more appealing since amines are
more basic, which results in more stable adducts with Cu(hfac)2. Accordingly, excess of
amine vapor is not expected to be necessary during the CVD. Furthermore, these
amines, like alcohols, can act as reducing agents. Chapter 2 addresses the synthesis and
characterization of amine adducts of the structure Cu(hfac)2(amine) that could be used as
Cu-CVD precursors. The efficiency of these adducts in Cu-CVD are judged by the film
resistivity and the rate of deposition under hydrogen as the carrier gas. To test the ability
of these amine adducts to act as self-reducing agents, the Cu-CVD experiments were
repeated utilizing the inert gas nitrogen as the carrier gas. In synthesizing
Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts, many side reactions took place. Chapter 3 of this dissertation
lists the reactions between Cu(hfac)2 and various amines that yielded unusual structures.
11
12
13
Chapter 2
Cu(hfac)2 Adducts With Amines
2.1 Introduction
As stated in Chapter 1, the use of Cu(hfac)2 alcohol adducts as Cu-CVD
precursors improved the thickness and purity of Cu films.2.1 However, alcohol adducts
need an excess of alcohol vapor for efficient Cu deposition. Therefore, the conversion
of the alcohol precursors to the use of amine adducts seems to be the next logical
choice. In this chapter, the preparation of several Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts is described
as well as their use as Cu-CVD precursors.
With their greater basicity, amines offer greater stability for the Cu(hfac)2
adducts. This was verified in the studies by Drago and coworkers. For example, the
measured binding constant K2.1 (see equation 2.1) in CCl4 is 1.7 103 for
L = CH3C(O)N(CH3)2 which binds through oxygen vs.107 for L = methylamine which
binds through the nitrogen.2.2
Cu(hfac)2
Cu(hfac)2L
2.1
This is an advantageous feature for CVD since an excess of amine vapor may not be
necessary during the CVD reaction. Primary and secondary amines can be oxidized to
imines; thus, amines can also be reducing agents. An added virtue of using amine
adducts is that amines are potentially capable of transferring a proton to the hfac ligand
during CVD. Pinkas et al.2.3 suggested that the proton transfer from the coordinated
water in Cu(hfac)2(H2O) to the hfac ligand proceeds via the following equation (2.2):
14
H
F 3C
H
O
CF3
F 3C
CF3
O
Cu
Cu
O
CF3
2.2
F3 C
HO
OH
F3C
CF3
Hhfac
To examine their postulate, they used ammonia (NH3) as the protonating agent. The
CVD experiments of Cu(hfac)2 were run under NH3 as the carrier gas. Table. 2.1
summarizes the findings of this study.
Table 2.1 CVD Of Cu(hfac)2 With NH3 As The Carrier Gas
Precursor
Substrate Temperature C
Cu(hfac)2
400
Cu(hfac)2
450
The authors concluded that a proton from NH3 has transferred to the hfac
ligands, which assists in ligand release. They suggested that the dissociation of the
hfac ligand took place in a way analogous to reaction 2.2.2.3
Most of the Cu(II) $-diketonate compounds that were studied for CVD have
square planar geometry. Cu(hfac)2 adducts with one additional ligand are usually
square pyramidal, with basal and apical metal ligand distance of ca. 1.90 and 2.2 D,
respectively. The copper atom is typically displaced 0.15-0.25 D out of the basal plane
toward the apical ligand.2.4
15
CF3
CF3
O
O
CF3
F3C
O
F3C
H3C
H3 C
O Cu
O
NH
H3C
CF3
O
O Cu
CH
NH2
O
CF3
H3C
CF3
b
H2N
F3C
CF3
O
Cu
H2N
F3C
CF3
CF3
CF3
O
CF3
O
F3C
F3C
O Cu
NH
CF3
O
O Cu
NH
O
CF3
CF3
16
Our choice for the above amines was mostly based on thermodynamic grounds
(see section 2.5). In our laboratory we attempted to synthesize a series of amine
adducts. However, we found that some of the amine adducts were very difficult to
isolate. The difficulties with these syntheses, and the side products that resulted in
some cases, are described in Chapter 3. The amines that we used successfully, as
described in this chapter, include several whose thermochemistry is well
understood.2.5, 2.6
Equations (2.3-2.8) illustrate the hypothetical reactions of some of theses
precursors under hydrogen and nitrogen as the carrier gases. For purpose of
comparison, Cu(hfac)2(i-PrOH) is included.
(a) Possible reactions under hydrogen:
Cu(hfac)2(i-PrOH) + H2
Cu(hfac)2(i-PrNH2) + H2
2.4
2.5
2.3
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.2 Experimental
2.2.1 Synthesis
Syntheses were performed under inert atmosphere in an Ar-filled glove box.
Amines were obtained from Aldrich; pure liquid amines were purged with N2 and stored
17
18
% Calculated
%C
%H
%N
%C
%Found
%H
%N
Cu(hfac)2 (dimethylamine)
27.57
1.74
2.67
27.83
1.65
2.67
Cu(hfac)2 (pyrrolidine)
30.64
2.02
2.55
30.86
2.16
2.54
19
collection and refinement parameters, are summarized in Appendix 1. Fig. 2.2 and Fig.
2.3 ( ORTEP) represent the crystal structures of the amine adducts found in this study.
Crystal data for Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine) and Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) are summarized
in Table 2.3. The other three adducts were also characterized by elemental and X-ray
analysis: Cu(hfac)2(isopropylamine), Cu(hfac)2(piperidine), and
Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2.2.8
20
21
Cu(hfac)2(Me2NH)
Formula
C14H11CuF12NO4
C12H8CuF12NO4
Formula weight
548.77
521.73
a/
9.0201(13)
10.6865(10)
b/
9.8876(9)
8.9631(8)
c/
11.4485(6)
19.6703(15)
"//
66.872(7)
90
$//
83.297(11)
100.674(7)
(//
87.452(12)
90
V/3
932.6(2)
1851.5(3)
Dcalc/g cm3
1.954
1.872
Space group
P1%, No. 2
P21/n
T/K
100(1)
293(2)
:/mm1
1.309
1.316
0.032
0.0735
0.038
0.1716
had reached the targeted temperatures, and the carrier gas flow was established, the
precursor was then introduced into the reactor and the CVD experiment was run for one
hour. A flow of the carrier gas was run into the reactor ca. 20 min afterwards while the
substrate was allowed to cool to room temperature.
The thickness and resistivities of the films were determined for at least five
samples for each precursor. The films thicknesses were measured by a stylus
profilometer while resistivities were evaluated with a four-point probe. Both
measurements were taken at the same positions (in the center and on four sides) for
every sample (Fig. 2.5).
The four-point probe reading indicates the resistance (R). This reading was converted to
bulk resistivity (Draw ) as given in equation 2.9.
Draw = C.F.TR
2.9
where T= film thickness and C.F.= correction factor. The correction factor for our
23
probe and substrate size is 3.9273.2.10 To correct for the systematic error caused by the
four-point probe machine, equation 2.10 was applied.
Dfilm = (1.67 :S cm Draw)/DCu
2.10
Where DCu=1.16 :S cm, the apparent resistivity of Cu foil, (0.0125 nm thick and 99.9%
pure) obtained from the same four-point probe machine.2.1
Table 2.4 represents an example of the measurements of the thickness and resistivity of
a single sample.
Table. 2.4 Film Thickness And Resistivity Of One Cu Film Deposited
From Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) Under Hydrogen
Position of
Mesurments
Thickness
(nm)
Sheet Resistance
(mS/sq)
Bulk Resistivity
(:S.cm)
450
0.00393
2.35
500
0.00359
2.14
715
0.00263
1.57
675
0.00774
4.67
645
0.00174
1.00
Average
600 110
0.0038 0.0024
2.3 1.4
24
experimental work that was conducted on a series of alcohols showed that the behavior
of these corresponding alcohol adducts is generally consistent with the alcohol
enthalpies of dehydrogenation. 2.1
The thermodynamic data that are available for amines are not as well
established. This stems from the fact that their oxidized counterparts are typically
unstable and difficult to isolate. Enthalpies of dehydrogenation of some amines are
summarized in table 2.3.
Table 2.5 Enthalpies Of Dehydrogenation
Of Some Amines
Amine
)H ( KJ/mol)
methylamine
92 calculated 1
ethylamine
71 calculated 1
dimethylamine
64 calculated 1
piperidine
87 experimental 2
pyrrolidine
1 Ref. 2.5
2
Ref. 2.6
67 experimental 2
25
26
27
Resistivity
(:S*cm)
Thickness
(nm)
Dep.
Rate
(nm/min)
m.poC
Cu(hfac)2(H2O)
220
3.5 0.7
1000 400
16 3
125-128
Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine)
225
3.5 0.7
500 200
8 3
88-90
Cu(hfac)2(piperidine)(2.8)
230
4.8 0.3
280 70
5 1
82-83
Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2 (2.8)
230
2.60.9
1000 300
20 7
128-130
Cu(hfac)2(isopropylamine)(2.8)
265
5.10.9
500 200
10 4
90-91
Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine)
285
3.4 0.9
780 190
16 4
70-71
Precursor
The amines precursors were also studied under nitrogen as a carrier gas to
determine their behavior as self-reducing precursors (see Table 2.5).
Table 2.7 CVD Results Under N2
Substrate
Temp. (C)
Resistivity
(:S*cm)
Thickness
(nm)
Dep. Rate
(nm/min)
Cu(hfac)2(piperidine)*
290
4050
4300
72
Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine)*
285
200
1000
17
Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2
275
19,00012,000
1900600
4010
Cu(hfac)2(isopropylamine)
285
109
30001000
5020
Precursor
28
+ H2
N
H
2.11
These fragments were not seen for the CVD under H2. This led us to conclude that
under N2, pyrrolidine oxidized to its imine counterpart, whereas H2 acts as the principal
reductant when it is present.
2.3.4 Discussion
In this work we have been studying a series of Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts as CuCVD precursors. We found that the amine ligands do not dissociate in the vapor phase;
this means that they are much more stable than those of alcohols. To compare their
efficiency to other precursors, CVD experiments were conducted under H2. The
results we obtained indicate that some of these adducts show improvements in terms of
deposition rate, such as Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2. Actually, we found that deposition rate
improves with elevated substrate temperatures. For example, Cu-CVD using
Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine) under hydrogen, using a substrate temperature of 261 C,
yielded a deposition rate of 4.8 nm/min, vs. 16 nm/min at 285 C (Table 2.6).
However, intrinsic instrumental problems make it difficult for us to consistently
reproduce experiments at substrate temperatures $ 300 C. The amine adducts in the
study all appear to be self-reducing CVD precursors, depositing very thin Cu films
under N2 CVD. In order to deposit thicker Cu films under nitrogen, higher substrate
29
temperatures may be needed, which are beyond the range of our CVD reactor. The
lower resistivity of the Cu film obtained with Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine) under N2 reflects a
higher purity film compared to Cu(hfac)2(piperidine). This can be explained as follows:
pyrrolidine is easier to oxidize to the corresponding imine than piperidine. Wiberg et
al.2.6 showed that the reaction in equation 2.11 is more favorable toward having the
double bond in the five- member ring by 20.5 kJ / mol.
2.3.5 Film Quality
The quality of a single sample can be deduced from the standard deviation of
the average value of the five measurements. For example, the high value of the
standard deviation for the measurements of thickness in Table 2.4 reflects that the
surface of this film is rough. This roughness affects the resistivity of the film as well.
As the roughness increases the calculated resistivity of the sample also increases,
lowering the apparent quality of the film. We found that the quality of the films
obtained under hydrogen as the carrier gas is better than those deposited
under nitrogen. This may indicate that hydrogen is still needed for assisting the
reduction of Cu(II) to the metal and transferring protons to the hfac .
2.3.6 Adhesion Measurement
To test the adhesion of the copper deposited films to the substrate glass, we
conducted the Scotch tape test.2.12 This test was conducted on the same samples that
were characterized in table 2.4. In this test the thin film was cut via a razor blade along
the horizontal and vertical planes.
30
The results of this test are summarized in table 2.7. The percentage of the film adhered
to the surface was estimated according to the literature.2.12
Table. 2.8 Adhesion Test Results
Compound
Cu(hfac)2(H2O)
20 10
Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine)
20 10
Cu(hfac)2(piperidine)
40 10
Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2
70 10
Cu(hfac)2(isopropylamine)
30 10
Cu(hfac)2(dimethylamine)
40 10
From the above results summarized in table 2.8 the amine adducts seem to adhere better
to the glass surface than the hydrate adduct. Although glass substrates are not used in
industry, our results may still represent as an improvement when it comes to Cu-CVD.
2.6 Conclusions
The adducts in this study with the exception of Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2 displayed
square pyramidal geometry. In this configuration the hfac ligand is twisting out of the
plane where one of the Cu--O bonds accommodates an axial position.
The CVD under H2 showed that except for Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2, these amine
adducts do not display improvement regarding the qualities of the deposited films. The
CVD that utilized Cu(hfac)2(amine) precursors under N2 verified that these adducts are
self-reducing precursors. The roughness of the film's surface increases the calculated
resistivity of the sample, lowering the apparent quality of the film.
We found that the quality of the films obtained under hydrogen as the carrier
gas is better than those acquired under nitrogen. This may indicate that hydrogen is still
31
needed for assisting the reduction of Cu(II) to the metal and transferring protons to
hfac .
Cu films deposited using Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts adhere somewhat better to
the glass surface than those deposited using Cu(hfac)2(H2O).
2.7 References
2.1) Fan, H. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, 2000.
2.2) McMillin, D. R.; Drago, R. S; Nusz, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,1976, 98,
3120-3126.
2.3) Pinkas, J.; Huffman, J. C.; Baxter, D. V.; Chisholm, M. H.; Caulton, K. G. Chem.
Mater. 1995, 7, 1589-1596.
2.4) Griffin, G. L.; Maverick, A. W. In The Chemistry of Metal CVD. Kodas, T.;
Hampden-Smith, M. eds. New York: VCH. Publishers, Inc. 1994, Chap. 4.
2.5) Jackman, L. M.; Packham, D. I. Proc. Chem. Soc. 1957, 349-350.
2.6) Wiberg, K. B.; Nakaji, D. Y.; Morgan, L. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
3527.
2.7) Bertrand, J. A.; Kaplan, R. I. Inorg. Chem., 1966, 5, 489-491.
2.8) Cygan, Z. T., unpublished work.
2.9) Kumar, R; Fronczek, F. R.; Maverick, A. W.; Lai, W. G.; Griffin, G. L. Chem.
Mater., 1992, 4, 577-582.
2.10) Tsai, J. C. C., "Diffusion", in Sze, S. M., Eds. VLSI Technology, 2ed, NYC:
McGraw-Hill, 1998; Chap. 7.
2.11) Hfelinger, G.; Steinmann, L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1977, 16, 47-48.
2.12) ASTM Test Method D3359-97 (method B), ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA,
1998.
32
Chapter 3
Attempted Synthesis Of Other Cu(hfac)2 Adducts
3.1 Introduction
The goal of my work is to prepare novel Cu-CVD precursors of the structure
Cu(hfac)2L, where L is either alcohol or amine. However, we found that the 1:1
reactions with Cu(hfac)2 and certain amines resulted in compounds with other formulas.
This chapter is dedicated to the synthesis and characterization of the products of
reactions between Cu(hfac)2 and the following ligands: triethylamine, diethylamine,
quinuclidine, diisopropylethylamine and propylene glycol.
3.2 Experimental
For general experimental manipulations see section 2.2.
3.2.1 Reaction Of Cu(hfac)2 With Triethylamine
We attempted to prepare Cu(hfac)2(NEt3) as follows: In the dry box, Cu(hfac)2
(0.474 g, 1 mmole) was dissolved in 50 mL of dichloromethane and triethylamine (0.14
mL, 1 mmole; distilled twice under N2 before use) was added. The solution was stirred
overnight. Evaporation of the solvent resulted in an emerald green oil. The oil was
triturated with hexane in an ice/salt bath. A very small quantity of a lime-green solid
separated with a melting point of 63-65 C. This lime-green solid sublimed under
vacuum at 40 C and its melting point was 68-69 C after sublimation. The
recrystallization of the sublimed solid was performed by dissolving it in chloroform and
layering with cyclohexane. Two types of crystals separated: lime green needles and
emerald green plate like crystals. The lime green crystals are (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3].
33
(See structure of the hydrated form of this compound, in section 3.2.2.). The emerald
green crystals were carefully separated and recrystallized using the same method. The
crystals turned out to be [Et3NH][(hfac)2Cu(-OH)Cu(hfac)2]. (Fig. 3.1)
3.2.2 (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3].H2O
To see if we could obtain (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3] using a different route, we tried
the following reaction. In this preparation we used the stoichiometric ratio of the
reactants. In the dry box Cu(hfac)2 (2.0 g, 4.2 mmole) was dissolved in 200 mL of
CH2Cl2 and NEt3 (0.60 mL, 4.2 mmole) was added to it and stirred overnight. Hhfac
(0.61 mL, 4.2 mmole) was added to this mixture and left to stir overnight. The
evaporation of the solvent resulted in a bright lime green solid (2.8 g, 83%) with a
34
35
Fig. 3.3 ORTEP Drawing Of The Dianion [Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2]2From The Structure Of (quinuclidinium)2[Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2]
3.2.4 Reaction Of Cu(hfac)2 With Diethylamine
This reaction was performed as follows: In the dry box, Cu(hfac)2
(1 g, 0.002 mole) was dissolved in 50 mL of dichloromethane and diethylamine
(0.21 mL, 0.002 mole; distilled twice under N2 before use), was added. The solution
was stirred overnight. Evaporation of the solvent resulted in a dark green oil. The oil
was triturated with hexane in an ice/salt bath. White and green solids separated. The
green solid was crystallized by slow evaporation of a solution in CHCl3/cyclohexane in
air, producing needle like crystals of [Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2][HNEt2]2. The anion
[Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2]2- in this salt has a structure very similar to that in the quinuclidinium
salt (Fig. 3.3).
36
37
38
39
40
91.949(3)
99.782(3)
110.015(3)
"//
$//
(//
P21/n
0.1533
7= [(hfac)Cu(3-OCH2CH(OH)CH3)]4
3=(Et3NH)[Cu2(hfac)4(-OH)]
4=(quinuclidinium)2[Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2]
6= Cu(hfac)2(CF3COCH(CF3)CHCHN(i-Pr)2)2
0.129
0.090
1.308
100(1)
1.913
5609(3)
90
99.758(2)
90
16.594(5)
20.869(6)
16.434(5)
1615.28
C38H32Cu3F36N2O14
2= (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3]
0.2794
0.115
1.246
100(1)
1.900
5914.3(15)
90
90
90
32.132(5)
13.567(2)
13.567(2)
1691.37
C44H36Cu3F36N2O14
5=Cu3(hfac)6(OH)2](Et2NH2)2
0.181
0.078
1.292
170(1)
P1bar, No. 2
1.886
1892.2(8)
108.929(14)
102.170(14)
93.892(13)
18.353(5)
11.998(3)
9.396(2)
1074.52
C26H21Cu2F24NO9
1= (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3].H2O
0.917
0.1046
:/mm
0.886
100(1)
0.0892
T/K
P1bar, No. 2
100(1)
Space group
1.822
2869.0(16)
90
98.383(17)
90
12.896(4)
1.791
Dcalc/g cm3
1492.45(11)
12.8520(5)
c/
V/
11.7170(5)
b/
12.439(4)
10.7570(5)
a/
18.078(6)
786.91
C21H21CuF18NO7 C21H19CuF18NO6
Formula
0.126
0.050
0.631
150(1)
P1bar, No. 2
1.645
1122.5(7)
109.655(16)
109.532(19)
95.166(18)
11.253(3)
10.753(4)
10.735(4)
1112.21
C36H36CuF24N2O6
0.163
0.175
1.823
100(1)
P2/c, No. 12
1.831
5015(3)
90
118.793(15)
90
23.767(8)
10.014(3)
24.046(8)
1382.74
C32H32Cu4F24O16
% Calculated
C
% Found
N
Cu(hfac)2NEt3 (1)
33.20
2.96
2.42
32.75
2.78
1.93
Cu(hfac)3(HNEt3)
32.05
2.43
1.78
---
---
---
Cu(hfac)3(HNEt3) H2O(2)
31.34
2.5
1.74
32.88
2.49
1.77
30.45
2.46
1.27
30.22
2.22
1.52
[Cu(hfac)2OHCu(hfac)2]HNEt3(2)
(1) Structure suggested in reference(3.2)
(2) Data obtained from this work.
The percentage of nitrogen found in the literature is 20% less than the calculated
value. Thus, we propose that they did not have Cu(hfac)2NEt3. The values in table 3.1
suggest that they probably had Cu(hfac)3(HNEt3).
Thermodynamic studies of the interaction between Cu(hfac)2 and NEt3 showed
that the observed enthalpy was 3 Kcal/mole lower than expected for reaction 2.1.3.3
They attributed this difference to the steric effect exerted by the bulky ligand, which
41
made the interaction weak. However, we believe this difference is because the reaction
is not a simple adduct formation. In related work, Belford et al.3.4 suggested that the
green crystals that resulted from the reaction of Cu(hfac)2(H2O) with quinuclidine (Q)
in CCl4 might contain Cu(hfac)2(Q) cocrystallized with quinuclidinium hydrochloride:
[Cu(hfac)2(Q)][QH+Cl-].
Based on these findings in the literature and structures presented in this work, it
appears that reactions between Cu(hfac)2 with Lewis bases do not always result in the
simple addition of the base to the acidic Cu(II). The formation of some of these
compounds that resulted from the reactions of Cu(hfac)2 with NEt3, NHEt2, and
quinuclidine can be explained through proton transfer. It is possible that the source of
the proton in this reaction is the presence of a small amount of H2O as follows:
2 Cu(hfac)2 + NEt3
H2 O
Cu(hfac)2 + HNEt3
[(hfac)2 Cu u-OHCu(hfac)2]
Cu(hfac) + (hfac)
+ HNEt 3
+ HNEt3
Cu(hfac)3HNEt3
42
coordination number of six (Fig. 3.1). The equatorial Cu-O bonds are 1.959(2) and
2.075(3) D and the axial Cu-O bonds Cu1-O5 and Cu1-O2 respectively are 2.170(3) and
2.187(2) D. Also the nitrogen atom of the amine is hydrogen-bonded (H-bonded) to O1
of the water molecule, N-O1 2.821(4) D and N-H-O 176. Water O1 is also H-bonded
to O6 and O2 of an adjacent Cu complex. The complex (Et3NH)[Cu(hfac)3] also has six
coordination around Cu(II). The equatorial Cu-O distances are 1.954(2)-2.022(2) D,
and the axial Cu-O distances are Cu1-O6 2.187(2), Cu1-O3 2.335(2) D. The amine
nitrogen N1 is H-bonded to O3 (N1-O3 2.911 D; N-H-O 168).
The compound (Et2NH)[Cu2(hfac)4(:-OH)] (Fig. 3.2) has Cu- -Cu separation of
3.0449(5) D. The equatorial Cu-O distances are 1.934(2)-1.976(2) D and axial Cu-O
distances are: Cu1-O5 2.20, Cu1-O8 2.63, Cu2-O4 2.96, Cu2-O9 2.204(2) D. Both Cu
atoms are displaced slightly out of their equatorial planes toward the closer axial O
atom (O5 and O9).
3.3.1.3 Reaction Of Cu(hfac)2 With Diisopropylethylamine
On the other hand, the structure obtained from treating Cu(hfac)2 with
diisopropylethylamine, trans-(hfac)2Cu(CF3COCH=C(CF3)CH=CHN(i-Pr)2)2, points to
some sort of oxidation taking place. Whether this oxidation took place during the
course of the synthesis reaction or during the crystallization process, was not examined.
If the oxidation occurred during the synthesis, then visible light might be involved in
the initiation of the oxidation. However, if this oxidation took place after the adduct
was exposed to air, then atmospheric oxygen could be what promoted the oxidation of
the amine or it could be photochemical oxidation. This point was not studied further
43
Pr3N
Pr3N + e
Pr3N + Pr3N
Pr2NCHCH2CH3
2Pr2NCHCH2CH3
(3.1)
Pr2NCHCH2CH3 + Pr3NH
(3.2)
Pr2N=CHCH2CH3 + e
(3.3)
Pr3N + Pr2NCH=CHCH3
(3.4)
Pr2N=CHCH2CH3 + H2O
Pr3NH2 + CH3CH2CHO
(3.5)
Pr2NCH=CHCH3 + H2O
Pr2NH + CH3CH2CHO
(3.6)
The protonated forms of amines are always the major product in the amine
oxidation reactions. It was thought that the amine cation radical is capable of
abstracting a hydrogen atom from the solvent or from water, if present, to give the
protonated amine and the solvent or hydroxyl radicals, from water, that may complicate
the reaction.3.5, 3.6
44
The most likely method of producing the skeleton we find is via oxidation of the
ethyl group in (i-Pr)2NEt, making (i-Pr)2NCH=CH2 (similar to the product of reaction
3.4). This enamine is nucleophilic at the terminal CH2 group (because of the
(i-Pr)2N=CHCH2 resonance structure, which gives the overall compound partial positive
charge at N and partial negative charge at CH2), so it could attack the Hhfac at the
carbonyl carbon atom.
Yufit et al.3.7 made a rather closely related compound. This compound was
prepared from triethylamine and (dibenzoylmethanato)antimony tetrachloride (Fig. 3.6):
NEt2
Ph
O
NEt2
Cl
Ph
Ph
Cl
Cl
Ph
Cl
45
[O]
R2NCH2CH3
R2NCH2CH3
-H
R2N
CH3
O
H
C
hfacH
NR2
CH
HC
C
C
H
H2
C
C
H2
F3C
CH2
F3C
CH3
CH2
R2N
H
R2N
R2N
R2NCH2CH3
C
H
CF3
-H2O
HO
C
F3C
NR2
C
C
H2
H
C
NR2
C
H
CF3
CF3
46
H2
N2
540 150
1300 500
200
160
3.7
However, i-PrOH dissociates readily from the adduct under the CVD conditions.
Therefore, it was necessary to use excess i-PrOH vapor to stabilize the precursor. The
need for excess i-PrOH vapor during the CVD run made us search for more stable
alcohol adducts to eliminate the use of the excess of alcohol vapor during the CVD run.
Diols and ether-alcohols might offer more stability to the adduct by binding to
the Cu(II) center through their two oxygen atoms. To examine this hypothesis,
James(3.1) has studied a series of diol and ether-alcohol adducts as Cu CVD precursors,
including the adducts of Cu(hfac)2 with ethylene glycol, 2-methoxyethanol, 1-methoxy2-propanol
47
and propylene glycol. In this study, it was found that the additional ligands in these
compounds are often monodentate, that is, only one oxygen of the ligand is coordinated
to the Cu(II) center. All of these compounds deposited copper films under hydrogen
without the use of excess diol or ether-alcohol. Among these precursors,
Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol) gave the best copper film quality.3.9
My contribution to this work is directed toward the precursor
Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol). James' s attempts to prepare Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol)
using a 1:1 ratio of the reactants resulted in a dark green solid with melting point of 5456 C. Although the elemental analysis suggests that the complex is
Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol), good crystals were not acquired. Actually, the crystals
that were obtained from this reaction were of Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol)2 with two
propylene glycol ligands mono-coordinating to the Cu(hfac)2. Thus, my goal was to
synthesize this compound, Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol)2, using different reactant ratios.
In my experiments, the reaction of Cu(hfac)2 with two equivalents of propylene
glycol resulted in the formation of [(hfac)Cu(:3-OCH2CH(OH)CH3)]4 as shown in Fig.
3.5. This is an example of a general type of structure called a cubane. (see Fig.3.7)
Cu
Cu
O
Cu
Cu
O
O
48
49
3.5 References
3.1) James, A. M. Unpublished work.
3.2) Nozari, M. S.; Drago, R. S. Inorg. Chem., 1970, 9, 47-52.
3.3) Belford, R. C. E.; Fenton, D. E.; Truter, M. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans, 1972,
2208-2213.
3.4) Belford, R. C. E.; Fenton, D. E.; Truter, M. R. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans,
1974,17-23.
3.5) Chow, Y. L.; Danen, W. C.; Nelsen, S. F.; Rosenblatt, D. H. Chem. Rev., 1978,78,
243-274. Zheng; Z., Evans; D. H., Nelson; S. F., J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65,
1793-1798.
3.6) Smith, P. J.; Mann, C. K. J. Org. Chem., 1969, 34, 1821-1826.
3.7) Yufit, D. S.; Struchkov, Yu. T.; Garbuzova, I. A.; Chernoglazova, I. V.; Gololobov,
I. V. Russ. Chem. Bull., 1994, 43, 245-248.
3.8) Fan, H. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, 2000.
3.9) James, A. M. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, 1999.
3.10) Biedell, W.; Shklover, V.; Baker, H. Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 5561-5571.
50
Chapter 4
Tetrameric Copper(I) Amide Clusters
4.1 Introduction
An aspect that has been investigated in our lab is to develop a new class of
volatile Cu(I) complexes that do not belong to the (hfac)Cu(I) group. Since these
new complexes contain no oxygen or fluorine atoms, this makes them ideal as
Cu-depositing precursors. Al is known for being electropositive and for its high affinity
toward oxygen and fluorine, which make it very reactive toward hfac ligands. Thus,
Cu-CVD precursors without oxygen or fluorine may be very useful for depositing
Cu-Al alloys.4.1 Furthermore, it has been demonstrated in the literature that many
complexes of Cu(I) are photochemically active.4.2 If these complexes are volatile
enough, then it may be possible to utilize them as precursors for photochemical vapor
deposition. In photochemical vapor deposition, light is used as the energy source for
decomposing the gaseous reactants. Photons excite the reactant gases, which enhance
their chemical reactivity. Thus, the excited state may react faster or at a lower
temperature than the ground state.4.3
Currently, we are searching for volatile Cu(I) compounds with photochemical
activity as potential Cu-CVD precursors. Our goal is to deposit copper films from these
complexes utilizing light as a source of energy or combining light with heat to enhance
the thermal decomposition in thermal CVD. However, most of the Cu(I)
photochemically active complexes that are known in the literature are ionic and their
salts are not volatile.4.2
51
On the other hand, neutral copper amide compounds, such as [CuN(SiMe3)2]4, are
promising Cu-CVD precursors since they exhibit some volatility.4.4 It was reported by
our group that [CuN(SiMe3)2]4 is luminescent and volatile enough to be used as a
Cu-CVD precursor.4.5 This complex was reported as a precursor for depositing Cu
films at a substrate temperature of 275 C.4.6 In our group we succeeded in depositing
Cu films from [CuN(SiMe3)2]4 at substrate temperature of 145 C via thermal CVD
experiments under hydrogen. There are some slight improvements for the Cu
deposition when Xe arc lamp irradiation was applied during the CVD run.4.5 However,
this finding is inconclusive, and more investigation needs to be carried out regarding
whether or not light may offer enhancement for the thermal Cu CVD.
This chapter summarizes the study of the photoactivities of several Cu(I) amide
tetramers. These tetramers are: [CuN(SiMe3)2]4, [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4, [CuN(i-Pr)2]4
and [CuNEt2]4.
4.2 Experimental
Chemicals were acquired from Aldrich Chemical Co. Solvents used were
anhydrous and deoxygenated. All reagents were used as received without further
purification. Syntheses were carried out in a drybox or in schlenk apparatus under
insert atmosphere.
4.2.1 [CuN(SiMe3)2]4
This compound was first prepared by Brger.4.7 In this study we prepared this
tetramer as follows: In the dry box, CuCl (4.949 g, 50 mmol) was placed in a flask that
was wrapped in foil to protect the CuCl from light. To this ether (50 mL) was added
52
and the suspension was stirred for an hour and a half. A solution of LiN(SiMe3)2 (1M;
55 mL, 55 mmol) in THF was added to the CuCl suspension. The mixture was left to
stir overnight. This was taken outside the dry box. This suspension was filtered over
Celite several times using warm pentane-DCM (1:1) mixture for rinsing until liquid was
clear. This was placed in the refrigerator for 24 hr. White solid developed from this
filtrate. H1 NMR (CDCl3, vs. TMS):, 0.42 ppm (200 MHz; lit. 0.34 ppm).4.5
4.2.2 [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4
The study of this tetramer was started by James.4.5 She attempted to make this
compound and measure its phosphorescence. She observed luminescence that appeared
to be green at room temperature and orange at low temperature. In this study we aimed
to follow up on DFT calculations and to find out more about the orange vs. green
luminescence.
In the dry box 3.82 mL (0.0190 mol) of N-tert-butyl-trimethylsilylamine and
11.8 mL of a 1.6 M solution of butyllithium (0.0188 mol) in n-hexane were dissolved in
ether and stirred for an hour. In another flask, which was wrapped in foil, a suspension
of CuCl(0.989 g, 0.01 mol) in ether was stirred for an hour. The amine salt mixture was
added to the CuCl suspension and stirred for one hour. The reaction mixture was taken
outside the dry box and it was stirred for four hours under N2 at -10 C. Dark purple
solid resulted. The suspension was filtered over Celite several times using hexane for
rinsing. When the yellowish filtrate ran almost colorless, the solvent was evaporated to
half its volume and left in the refrigerator overnight. Colorless crystals formed.
However, the yield was minimal. These crystals were placed under a long-wave
53
(365 nm) UV lamp; two different colors of luminescence were observed: green and
orange. The two different crystals were separated by spatula and were analyzed by
X-ray. The crystals with green luminescence were of the structure given in (Fig.4.1).
The crystals with orange luminescence turned to blue powder and could not be
characterized further. The two products have similar solubility and sublimation
temperatures. Small quantities of the orange luminescent material could be separated
because it dissolves more readily in benzene than the green luminescent material. This
could not be adapted readily to a chromatographic separation, because the compounds
decompose on silica gel. However, we were able to partially separate the orange and
green luminescent products and obtain their phosphorescence spectra.
54
mixture. The product mixture showed two different luminescences under the UV light:
orange and green. The solvent was evaporated which resulted in a mixture of white and
dark brown solid. The white solid was of green luminescent color under UV light and
the orange luminescence disappeared after the solvent evaporation. This white material
was separated via spatula and its emission spectra were measured under nitrogen.
4.2.4 [CuNEt2]4
This was prepared according to the literature.4.8
4.2.5 Luminescence Measurements
The phosphorescence data were collected using a Spex Instruments Fluorolog 2
model F112X spectrometer (Hamamatsu R636 photomultiplier). Spectra were
measured at room temperature and 77 K (cooling with Liq N2) for each tetramer.
4.3 Results
4.3.1 Preparations And Properties
Synthesis of the copper(I) amide tetramers was carried out by a metathesis
reaction on copper(I) halide, CuCl, and one equivalent of the appropriate lithium amide
in ether, except for [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4 (see below), as in the following equation:
CuCl + Li[NR2]
1/4[CuNR2]4 + LiCl
(1)
except for [CuN(SiMe3)2]4. We found that by varying the reactant ratios in the
preparation of [CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4, the synthesis may lead to the production of more
of the green or orange material. For example, we found that the producing more green
compound is parallel with the presence of more ligand. The products were difficult to
purify. Except for [CuN(SiMe3)2]4, the tetramers were isolated from impurity by
mechanical separation under UV light. This may be because [CuN(SiMe3)2]4 is more
stable than the others due to the bulky N(SiMe3)2 ligand.
The Cu(I) tetramers in this study are colorless crystalline complexes. Some of
these compounds showed stability in air, however, all compounds decomposed, over a
period of weeks, in solvents to blue solid. The luminescence behavior and the stability
of these complexes is summarized in Table ( 4.2).
Table 4.2 Luminescence Of Cu(I) Tetramers And Their
Stability
Compound
Luminescence
Stability in air
[CuN(SiMe3)2]4
bright green
stable
[CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4 (I )
green
stable
"[CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]"n (II)
orange
stable
[CuN(iPr)2]4
green
not stable
[CuNEt2]4
green
not stable
57
The solid state emisson maxima, 8em (M-M) are given in table 4.3.
Table 4.3 Estimated 8em Max For Phosphorescence(nm)
Compound
300 K
77 K
[CuN(SiMe3)2]4
512
525
[CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]4 (I )
510
532
"[CuN(t-Bu)(SiMe3)]"n (II)
595
625
[CuN(iPr)2]4
560
600
[CuNEt2]4
545
-550
Cu...Cu D
Cu-N D
N-Cu-N
Cu-N-Cu
[CuNMe2]44.9
2.702(2)
1.890(5)
178.5(2)
91.2(2)
[CuNEt2]44.8
2.664(2)
1.904(3)
175.4(1)
88.8(1)
[CuNC4H8]44.9
2.717(2)
1.885(4)
177.1(2)
92.2(2)
[CuNSiMe3But]4
2.714(8)
1.941(2)
178.4(10)
89.0(14)
[CuN(SiMe3)2]44.5
2.6937(7)
1.925(4)
179.0(1)
88.3(1)
[CuNMe((CH2)2NMe2)]44.9
2.618
1.913
169.4
86.1
The examples that are provided in this table show that the average separation
between two neighboring copper atoms (2.702(2) D) is very close to those found in
alkoxo and alkyl derivatives. For instance, [Cu(OBut)]4 has a Cu...Cu separation of
2.709(3) D, where [CuNEt2]4 has a Cu...Cu distance of 2.664(2) D.4.8 However, these
separation distances are considerably longer than those in organometallic derivatives
58
(e.g. [Cu(CH2SiMe3)]4, Cu...Cu 2.418(2) D), indicating that the Cu...Cu separation is
greatly affected by bridging. In the examples presented in table (4.4) it seems that the
tetramers are held together by ligand donor participation. Both of the ligands, alkoxide
and amide, have two or more lone pairs which may behave as the donors.
An alkyl group, on the other hand, has only one pair of electrons available to bond the
two metal centers. Essentially, the bond between the carbon atom and the two Cu
centers is a 3-center-2-electron bond. This makes the Cu-C-Cu angle the smallest of the
three.(Fig.4.2)
R
O
H2
N
Cu
Cu
Cu
R3
C
Cu
Cu
Cu
59
[CuN(SiMe3)]4 which was performed by another member of our group for comparison.4.5
4.4 Discussion
4.4.1 Spectroscopic Properties
The evaluation of the electronic structure of metal complexes reveals a basic
difference between the d1-9 and d10 configurations. This difference arises from the fact
those d-d transitions cannot occur in d10 systems.4.3 Therefore, in d10 complexes such as
Cu(I), only MLCT and metal localized transitions are possible. Metal-to-ligand charge
transfer (MLCT) transitions result from the outward flow of electron density from a
metal orbital to ligand-based orbital.
There are two types of metal localized transitions in d10 complexes: one type
involves a transition from (n-1)d10 to (n-1)d9ns1, and the other from (n-1)d10 to (n1)d9np1. Metal centered transitions result in a change in the principal quantum number,
n, which is not allowed. Therefore, this type of absorption is typically of low
intensity.4.3
The absorption of light by a molecule causes it to experience a transition from
an electronic ground state (GS) to an electronic excited state (ES). It is conceivable that
with the altered electron arrangement, the excited state will have different equilibrium
geometry than the ground state.
According to the Franck-Condon principle, the electronic transition is very rapid
compared to the speed of vibrational nuclear motion. Therefore, the ES will be in a
vibrationally excited (i.e. non-equilibrium) geometry, corresponding to a vibrational ES
of the electronic excited state.
60
The emission from the excited state occurs either with the same spin as that of
the ground state, fluorescence, or with a different spin from the ground state,
phosphorescence. The later is produced by an intersystem crossing and it is not
allowed by the spin selection rule. Thus, phosphorescence lifetimes are usually much
longer than fluorescence lifetimes. Accordingly, phosphorescence is more likely to be
useful in photo-induced CVD.
Emission usually occurs at lower energy because it returns the molecule to a
vibrational excited state of the electronic ground state. The energy difference between
an absorption peak and the corresponding emission is known as the Stokes shift. The
magnitude of the Stokes shift is a fairly sensitive guide to the geometric differences
between GS and ES.
When it comes to Cu(I) luminescent clusters, one of the questions that emerge is
the extent of metal-metal interaction in the relevant excited state. Holt and coworkers
conducted studies for a series of [CuIL]4 (cubanes) in an attempt to answer this
question.4.10
Table 4.5 Solid State Emission Maxima4.10
Cluster
Cu-Cu
(D)
8em (MLCT)
8em (M-M)
(nm)
X-Cu-X
deg
Cu-X-Cu
deg
[CuIpy]4
2.691(5)
436
615
110.9-120.2(1)
57.7-61.1(1)
[CuIpip]4
2.657(2)
---
570
113.48(4)
58.93(5)
[CuIpy]4
2.875(2)
449
---
104.0-115(1)
65.3-104.0(1)
[CuICH3CN]4
3.022(10)4.298(13)
540
---
107.0-111.5(3)
69.0(2)--107.0(4)
(nm)
61
For the clusters in table (4.4) the angles at copper are nearly constant regardless of the
differences in the bulk of the ligands.
They concluded that only those with ground state of Cu-Cu distances less than
the Cu(I) van der Waals radii (2.8 D) display the lower energy ("M-M*") emission.
This study concluded that the emissions in the range 550-680 nm are due to metal
localized ("M-M") transition. This assignment derives from the fact that the absorption
is absent in polymeric systems of the same stoichiometry and ligand identity where
Cu-Cu separation is longer.4.10 From this table we learned that one method of
understanding our luminescence is by examining M-M distance. This table presents
two groups of luminescent Cu(I) compounds. The groups are of short and long M-M
distances. We found that our compounds have shorter M-M distance, which is
consistent with M-centered luminescence.
Hoffmann et al. 4.11 carried out a molecular orbital calculations on Cu(I) model
systems. He has shown that Cu4+4 clusters with Cu-Cu distances of 2.8 D have a
binding energy of -0.417 eV, and that the bonding strength increases as the Cu-Cu
distances decreased. The binding energy is -0.984 eV at a Cu-Cu distance of 2.57 D. A
model dimeric system ([Cu(CH2)2PH2]2) gave a computed optimum Cu-Cu distance of
2.7 D with Cu-Cu orbital overlap population increasing as the Cu-Cu separation
decreased. This study confirmed that a Cu...Cu distance of 2.8 D or less is an indication
of Cu-Cu interaction.
In our laboratory we have established a good familiarity with the tetramer
[CuN(SiMe3)2]. We found that this tetramer has two absorption maxima
62
(at 283 and 246 nm) and emits intense blue-green luminescence when the compound is
excited at wavelengths below 400 nm.4.6 In the current study we found that the
tetramers we focused on behave in an analogous manner.
In the molecular orbital model of the bonding within the square-planar (D4h) Cu4
group of [CuN(R)2], each copper atom utilizes one d and s orbital in a F bonding to the
ligands. Mixing 3dxyand 4s and 4px orbitals, stabilizes the occupied eu orbital and
increases stability of the cluster. The molecular orbital energy diagram in Fig. 4.3
illustrates that the HOMOs are 4a2g and 12eu, and the LUMO is 9a1g.
63
9a1g: 16%
Cu
z x
y
Cu
Cu
Cu
13%
N
Cu
z x
y
Cu
Cu
Cu
64
should be significantly distorted from the ground state, i.e., the HOMO-LUMO
excitation should lead to enhanced intermetallic bonding, and the structure should
contract.
4.5 Conclusions
The work presented in this chapter was begun by a previous member of our
group.4.5 In this study we found that these tetramers have fair stability in air when
SiMe3 is present in the ligand. The fact that some of these tetramers are air stable,
sublimable and luminescent indicates that these compounds are potential precursors for
photochemical CVD.
4.6 References
4.1) Eiichi, K.; Yumiko, K.; Nobuyuki, T.; Tomohiro, O. J. Electrochem. Soc.,1994,
3494-3499.
4.2) Kutal, C. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1990, 99, 213-252.
4.3) Elliott, D. J. Integrated Circuit Fabrication Technology, Second Edition, 1989,
McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York.;chapter 1.
4.4) Lappert, M. F.; Power, P. P.; Sanger, A. R.; Srivastava, R. C. Metal and
Metalloid Amides. Horwood: Chichester, England, 1980.
4.5) James, A. M.; Laxman, R. K.; Fronczek, F. R.; Maverick, A. W. Inorg. Chem.,
1998, 37, 3785-3791.
4.6) Baxter, D. V.; Chisholm, M. H.; Gama, G. J.; Hector, A. L.; Parkin, I. P. Adv.
Mater. 1995, 7, 49-51.
4.7) Brger, H.; Wannagat, U. Monatsh. Chem. 1964, 95, 1099-1102.
4.8) Hope; H., Power; P. P., Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 936-937.
4.9) Gambarotta. S.; Bracci, M.; Floriani, C.; Chiesi-Villa, A.; Guastini, C. J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans. 1987, 1883-1888.
65
4.10) Rath, N. P.; Holt, E. M.; Tanimura, K. Inorg. Chem. 1985, 24, 3934-3938.
4.11) Mehrotra, P.; Hoffmann, R. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2187-2189.
4.12) Brett, C. M. M. S. Thesis, Ohio State University, 2000. Brett, C. M.; Bursten,
B. E. Unpublished work.
66
Chapter 5
Conclusions And Future Work
5.1 Introduction
In this dissertation we tried to explore different aspects that are related to
Cu-CVD precursors. This thesis researched the quality of Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts as
well as the potential of the luminescent [CuNR2]4 as Cu-CVD precursors.
5.2 Cu(hfac)2(amine) Adducts
Chapter 2 described the synthesis and the characterization of a series of
Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts. From the synthesis we discovered that some of these adducts
are difficult to isolate.
The study of these adducts as Cu-CVD precursors under hydrogen showed some
improvement for (Cu(hfac)2(allylamine)2) in the deposition rate compared to the alcohol
adducts. The study of the same adducts under the inert gas nitrogen proved that these
adducts are self-reducing precursors. However, we learned that when H2 is present it
acts as the principal reducing agent.
The amine adducts were more stable than the alcohol ones, and no excess of
amine vapor was needed during the CVD reactions. Also we found that the
Cu(hfac)2(amine)-based Cu films adhere better to the glass substrate than those
deposited using Cu(hfac)2(H2O).
Chapter 3 showed that the bulky amines are not a good choice for synthesizing
Cu(hfac)2(amine) adducts. The reactions between Cu(hfac)2 and bulky amines resulted
in several different types of ionic complexes.
67
Also the reaction of Cu(hfac)2 with propylene glycol did not result in the desired
compound (Cu(hfac)2(propylene glycol)2; instead we obtained a cubane. This result
agrees with James's result that these diols ligands prefer binding in monodentate
fashion to Cu(hfac)2, rather than bidentate.5.1
5.3 [CuNR2]4
In chapter 4 we found that the tetramers that were studied are luminescent and
some of them are volatile enough to function as copper thermal or photochemical vapor
deposition precursors. In this thesis we investigated the photo behavior of these
tetramers both at room temperature and at 77K. We attributed the big Stokes shift
between the absorption and the emission maxima to the difference in the geometry
between the ground and excited states. We found that when the bulky SiMe3 group is
present in the ligand this contributes to the stability of the tetramers and make it
possible to handle this tetramer in air. However, all these tetramers were at least
somewhat air-sensitive in solution.
The isolation of these tetramers proved to be a challenging task, thus, there is a
room here for future work in this regard. In addition, we were not able to study these
tetramers as Cu-CVD precursors. This was due to the fact that our lab is currently not
equipmed to perform this study. The design of photo CVD or thermal and photo CVD
reactor for depositing Cu films from these tetramers remains a future work to be
accomplished.
68
5.4 Reference
5.1) James, A. M. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, 1999.
69
Appendix A
Crystal Data
This appendix consists of tables of x-ray crystal structure data in CIF formats.
Table A-1.CIF File For Cu(hfac)2(pyrrolidine)
_chemical_name_systematic
;
bis(1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoropentanedionato)(pyrrolidine)copper(II)
;
_chemical_name_common
?
_chemical_formula_moiety
'C14H11NO4F12Cu'
_chemical_formula_structural
?
_chemical_formula_analytical
?
_chemical_formula_sum
'C14H11NO4F12Cu'
_chemical_formula_weight
548.77
_chemical_melting_point
?
_chemical_compound_source
?
loop_
_atom_type_symbol
_atom_type_description
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_real
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_imag
_atom_type_scat_source
C ? 0.002 0.002 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
H ? 0.000 0.000 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
N ? 0.004 0.003 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
O ? 0.008 0.006 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
F ? 0.014 0.010 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
Cu ? 0.263 1.266 International_Tables_Vol_IV_Table_2.3.1
CRYSTAL DATA
_symmetry_cell_setting
triclinic
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M
'P-1'
_symmetry_space_group_name_Hall '-P 1'
loop_
_symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz
'x,y,z'
-x,-y,-z
_cell_length_a
9.0201(13)
_cell_length_b
9.8876(9)
70
_cell_length_c
11.4485(6)
_cell_angle_alpha
66.872(7)
_cell_angle_beta
83.297(11)
_cell_angle_gamma
87.452(12)
_cell_volume
932.6(2)
_cell_formula_units_z
2
_cell_measurement_temperature
100
_cell_measurement_reflns_used
25
_cell_measurement_theta_min
12.0
_cell_measurement_theta_max
23.0
_cell_special_details
;?
;
_exptl_crystal_description
fragment
_exptl_crystal_colour
'emerald green'
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.58
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.50
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.45
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn
1.954
_exptl_crystal_density_method
'none'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
542
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 1.309
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type psi_scans_(North,_Phillips,_Mathews,_1968)
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.8327
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 1.0000
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
_diffrn_special_details
;?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
100
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
Mo-K\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
sealed_tube
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device
Enraf_Nonius_CAD4
_diffrn_measurement_method
\q/2\q
_diffrn_standards_number
3
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time 60
71
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
0.7
loop_
_diffrn_standard_refln_index_h
_diffrn_standard_refln_index_k
_diffrn_standard_refln_index_l
? ? ?
? ? ?
? ? ?
_diffrn_reflns_number
7628
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.015
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI
1.000
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
-12
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
8
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
-13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-16
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
15
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.5
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
30.0
_reflns_number_total
5425
_reflns_number_observed
5183
_reflns_observed_criterion
>1.0\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
'CAD4_(Enraf-Nonius,_1994)'
_computing_cell_refinement
CAD4_(Enraf-Nonius,_1994)
_computing_data_reduction
'process_MolEN_(Fair,_1990)'
_computing_structure_solution
Direct_methods_(MULTAN,_Main_et_al.,_1980)
_computing_structure_refinement LSFM_MolEN_(Fair,_1990)
_computing_molecular_graphics
?
_computing_publication_material BTABLE_PTABLE_CIF_IN_MolEN_(Fair,_1990)
REFINEMENT DATA
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef F
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
'4Fo^2^/(\s^2^(Fo^2^) + 0.0004 Fo^4^)'
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment
mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
isotropic_(Zachariasen,_1963)
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
3.7(7)E-7
_refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack ?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
5183
_refine_ls_number_parameters
335
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_number_constraints
0
72
_refine_ls_abs_structure_details
;?
;
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.032
_refine_ls_R_factor_obs
0.030
_refine_ls_wR_factor_all
0.038
_refine_ls_wR_factor_obs
0.038
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_all 1.993
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_obs 1.990
_refine_ls_shift/esd_max
0.003
_refine_ls_shift/esd_mean
0.000
_refine_diff_density_max
0.576
_refine_diff_density_min
-0.237
ATOMIC COORDINATES AND THERMAL PARAMETERS
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_thermal_displace_type
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_calc_attached_atom
_atom_site_type_symbol
Cu1 0.09532(2) 0.04024(2) 0.34497(1) 0.01308(6) 1.000 Uij ? ? Cu
F1 0.1307(1) -0.5309(1) 0.6208(1) 0.0262(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F2 -0.0720(1) -0.4097(1) 0.6239(1) 0.0277(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F3 0.1084(1) -0.3875(1) 0.72161(9) 0.0276(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F4 0.4577(1) -0.1470(1) 0.09958(8) 0.0239(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F5 0.4992(1) -0.3394(1) 0.2640(1) 0.0470(6) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F6 0.3120(2) -0.3327(1) 0.1616(1) 0.0630(5) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F7 0.1718(2) 0.3505(1) -0.06284(9) 0.0333(5) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F8 0.3749(1) 0.4394(2) -0.0453(1) 0.0422(6) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F9 0.1652(2) 0.5273(1) 0.0003(1) 0.0363(6) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F10 0.5040(1) 0.1363(1) 0.5059(1) 0.0313(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F11 0.3680(1) 0.3230(1) 0.4960(1) 0.0449(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
F12 0.5533(1) 0.3439(1) 0.3531(1) 0.0357(5) 1.000 Uij ? ? F
O1 0.0875(1) -0.1471(1) 0.49688(9) 0.0152(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? O
O2 0.2743(1) -0.0583(1) 0.2482(1) 0.0191(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? O
O3 0.1172(1) 0.2121(1) 0.18399(9) 0.0168(4) 1.000 Uij ? ? O
73
Cu1 N1 1.992(1) . . ?
F1 C4 1.332(2) . . ?
F2 C4 1.341(2) . . ?
F3 C4 1.327(2) . . ?
F4 C5 1.322(2) . . ?
F5 C5 1.332(2) . . ?
F6 C5 1.335(2) . . ?
F7 C9 1.318(2) . . ?
F8 C9 1.327(2) . . ?
F9 C9 1.325(2) . . ?
F10 C10 1.328(2) . . ?
F11 C10 1.333(2) . . ?
F12 C10 1.330(2) . . ?
O1 C1 1.278(2) . . ?
O2 C3 1.229(2) . . ?
O3 C6 1.253(2) . . ?
O4 C8 1.263(1) . . ?
N1 C11 1.493(2) . . ?
N1 C14 1.497(2) . . ?
N1 H1N 0.83(2) . . ?
C1 C2 1.375(2) . . ?
C1 C4 1.536(2) . . ?
C2 C3 1.417(2) . . ?
C2 H2 0.87(2) . . ?
C3 C5 1.542(2) . . ?
C6 C7 1.396(2) . . ?
C6 C9 1.539(2) . . ?
C7 C8 1.387(2) . . ?
C7 H7 0.89(2) . . ?
C8 C10 1.535(2) . . ?
C11 C12 1.520(3) . . ?
C11 H11b 0.97(2) . . ?
C11 H11a 0.93(2) . . ?
C12 C13a 1.559(4) . . ?
C12 C13b 1.487(6) . . ?
C12 H12b 0.88(2) . . ?
C12 H12a 0.89(2) . . ?
C13a C13b 0.773(5) . . ?
C13a C14 1.502(3) . . ?
C13a H13a1 0.95 . . ?
C13a H13a2 0.95 . . ?
C13b C14 1.578(5) . . ?
C13b H13a1 0.868(7) . . ?
C13b H13b1 0.95 . . ?
76
C2 C1 C4 116.9(1) . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 123.8(1) . . . ?
C1 C2 H2 118(1) . . . ?
C3 C2 H2 117(1) . . . ?
O2 C3 C2 128.6(1) . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 116.7(1) . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 114.7(1) . . . ?
F1 C4 F2 106.8(1) . . . ?
F1 C4 F3 107.4(1) . . . ?
F1 C4 C1 113.9(1) . . . ?
F2 C4 F3 107.0(1) . . . ?
F2 C4 C1 110.1(1) . . . ?
F3 C4 C1 111.3(1) . . . ?
F4 C5 F5 107.6(1) . . . ?
F4 C5 F6 107.2(1) . . . ?
F4 C5 C3 112.5(1) . . . ?
F5 C5 F6 107.4(1) . . . ?
F5 C5 C3 111.6(1) . . . ?
F6 C5 C3 110.3(1) . . . ?
O3 C6 C7 128.5(1) . . . ?
O3 C6 C9 113.8(1) . . . ?
C7 C6 C9 117.6(1) . . . ?
C6 C7 C8 120.6(1) . . . ?
C6 C7 H7 119(1) . . . ?
C8 C7 H7 119(1) . . . ?
O4 C8 C7 128.7(1) . . . ?
O4 C8 C10 113.3(1) . . . ?
C7 C8 C10 117.9(1) . . . ?
F7 C9 F8 107.2(1) . . . ?
F7 C9 F9 107.7(1) . . . ?
F7 C9 C6 111.5(1) . . . ?
F8 C9 F9 107.7(1) . . . ?
F8 C9 C6 111.9(1) . . . ?
F9 C9 C6 110.5(1) . . . ?
F10 C10 F11 107.3(1) . . . ?
F10 C10 F12 106.7(1) . . . ?
F10 C10 C8 111.7(1) . . . ?
F11 C10 F12 107.9(1) . . . ?
F11 C10 C8 109.8(1) . . . ?
F12 C10 C8 113.1(1) . . . ?
N1 C11 C12 105.6(1) . . . ?
N1 C11 H11b 110(1) . . . ?
N1 C11 H11a 110(1) . . . ?
C12 C11 H11b 114(1) . . . ?
78
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_3
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_4
_geom_torsion_publ_flag
O2 Cu1 O1 C1 -19.5(1) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O1 C1 -6.4(4) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O1 C1 -111.5(1) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 O1 C1 83.3(1) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O2 C3 18.0(1) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O2 C3 -160.4(1) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O2 C3 108.0(1) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 O2 C3 -71.4(1) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O3 C6 -83.9(4) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O3 C6 -70.7(1) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O3 C6 21.2(1) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 O3 C6 -173.5(1) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O4 C8 156.2(1) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O4 C8 67.7(1) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O4 C8 -17.0(1) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 O4 C8 -114.7(2) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 N1 C11 135.0(1) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 N1 C14 -101.6(1) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 N1 C11 -136.5(1) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 N1 C14 -13.1(1) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 N1 C11 -52.0(1) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 N1 C14 71.4(1) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 N1 C11 45.9(2) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 N1 C14 169.3(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C1 C2 15.2(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C1 C4 -164.01(9) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C3 C2 -11.4(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C3 C5 167.5(1) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C6 C7 -14.7(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C6 C9 169.0(1) . . . . ?
Cu1 O4 C8 C7 5.6(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 O4 C8 C10 -178.17(9) . . . . ?
Cu1 N1 C11 C12 162.3(1) . . . . ?
C14 N1 C11 C12 33.6(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 N1 C14 C13a -169.0(1) . . . . ?
Cu1 N1 C14 C13b -139.0(2) . . . . ?
C11 N1 C14 C13a -38.8(2) . . . . ?
C11 N1 C14 C13b -8.7(2) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C2 C3 0.3(3) . . . . ?
C4 C1 C2 C3 179.4(1) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C4 F1 -177.3(1) . . . . ?
80
O1 C1 C4 F2 62.7(2) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C4 F3 -55.8(2) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F1 3.3(2) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F2 -116.7(1) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F3 124.9(1) . . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 O2 -1.0(3) . . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 C5 -179.9(2) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F4 6.1(2) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F5 127.2(2) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F6 -113.5(2) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F4 -174.8(1) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F5 -53.8(2) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F6 65.5(2) . . . . ?
O3 C6 C7 C8 -3.9(3) . . . . ?
C9 C6 C7 C8 172.3(1) . . . . ?
O3 C6 C9 F7 -31.0(2) . . . . ?
O3 C6 C9 F8 -151.2(1) . . . . ?
O3 C6 C9 F9 88.7(2) . . . . ?
C7 C6 C9 F7 152.2(1) . . . . ?
C7 C6 C9 F8 32.0(2) . . . . ?
C7 C6 C9 F9 -88.0(2) . . . . ?
C6 C7 C8 O4 8.9(2) . . . . ?
C6 C7 C8 C10 -167.1(1) . . . . ?
O4 C8 C10 F10 48.5(2) . . . . ?
O4 C8 C10 F11 -70.5(2) . . . . ?
O4 C8 C10 F12 168.9(1) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C10 F10 -134.9(1) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C10 F11 106.2(2) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C10 F12 -14.4(2) . . . . ?
N1 C11 C12 C13a -16.0(2) . . . . ?
N1 C11 C12 C13b -45.5(3) . . . . ?
C11 C12 C13a C13b -82.0(5) . . . . ?
C11 C12 C13a C14 -7.4(2) . . . . ?
C13b C12 C13a C14 74.6(5) . . . . ?
C11 C12 C13b C13a 104.8(4) . . . . ?
C11 C12 C13b C14 38.3(3) . . . . ?
C13a C12 C13b C14 -66.5(4) . . . . ?
C12 C13a C13b C14 109.1(2) . . . . ?
C14 C13a C13b C12 -109.1(2) . . . . ?
C12 C13a C14 N1 28.1(2) . . . . ?
C12 C13a C14 C13b -66.8(5) . . . . ?
C13b C13a C14 N1 94.8(5) . . . . ?
C12 C13b C14 N1 -19.3(4) . . . . ?
C12 C13b C14 C13a 74.1(4) . . . . ?
81
82
10.6865(10)
83
_cell_length_b
8.9631(8)
_cell_length_c
19.6703(15)
_cell_angle_alpha
90.000(7)
_cell_angle_beta
100.674(7)
_cell_angle_gamma
90.00
_cell_volume
1851.5(3)
_cell_formula_units_Z
4
_cell_measurement_temperature 293(2)
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 25
_cell_measurement_theta_min
9.26
_cell_measurement_theta_max
11.3
_exptl_crystal_description
fragment
_exptl_crystal_colour
green
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.15
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.45
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.50
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.872
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
1024
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 1.316
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type '\h scans'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.2841
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.3541
_exptl_absorpt_process_details ?
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
180
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device_type 'Enraf-Nonius CAD4 diffractometer'
_diffrn_measurement_method
'2-\w scans'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
3
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time 3600
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
?
84
_diffrn_reflns_number
4358
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.0284
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0341
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
-13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
-11
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
0
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-25
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
0
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.37
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
27.48
_reflns_number_total
4241
_reflns_number_gt
3055
_reflns_threshold_expression
>2sigma(I)
_computing_data_collection
'CAD4 Express (Enraf-Nonius, 1994)'
_computing_cell_refinement
'CAD4 Express (Enraf-Nonius, 1994)'
_computing_data_reduction
'XCAD4 (Harms & Wocaldo, 1996)'
_computing_structure_solution 'SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 1990)'
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics 'Bruker SHELXTL'
_computing_publication_material 'Bruker SHELXTL'
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.1529P)^2^+9.2726P] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
85
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
4241
_refine_ls_number_parameters
356
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.0735
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.0452
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.1716
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.1254
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 0.622
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
0.622
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.080
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.006
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.16500(4) 0.06699(6) 0.98370(2) 0.03987(18) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F1 F -0.0265(3) 0.1028(5) 1.17542(15) 0.0759(10) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F 0.1291(4) -0.0442(4) 1.20546(17) 0.0833(10) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F 0.1376(3) 0.1798(4) 1.24424(13) 0.0691(9) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4 F 0.5087(14) 0.348(2) 1.1729(7) 0.116(5) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F6 F 0.4066(15) 0.5096(14) 1.1161(12) 0.134(7) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F5 F 0.5238(18) 0.384(3) 1.0705(9) 0.140(10) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F4' F 0.4325(17) 0.471(2) 1.1538(10) 0.138(10) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F5' F 0.5466(9) 0.2916(15) 1.1353(11) 0.120(5) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F6' F 0.4830(18) 0.439(2) 1.0587(9) 0.119(8) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F7 F -0.1566(12) 0.3663(19) 0.8728(8) 0.085(5) Uani 0.52(3) 1 d P . .
F8 F -0.021(2) 0.525(2) 0.9085(19) 0.164(10) Uani 0.52(3) 1 d P . .
F9 F -0.0582(17) 0.459(4) 0.8038(12) 0.112(7) Uani 0.52(3) 1 d P . .
F9' F -0.1499(18) 0.367(2) 0.8498(18) 0.133(8) Uani 0.48(3) 1 d P . .
F8' F -0.008(3) 0.5235(19) 0.8323(12) 0.097(6) Uani 0.48(3) 1 d P . .
F7' F -0.0482(17) 0.5004(18) 0.9295(7) 0.086(4) Uani 0.48(3) 1 d P . .
F10 F 0.4115(10) 0.2384(12) 0.8152(6) 0.097(4) Uani 0.611(15) 1 d P . .
86
;
loop_
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_1
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_2
_geom_bond_distance
_geom_bond_site_symmetry_2
_geom_bond_publ_flag
Cu1 O3 1.950(3) . ?
Cu1 O2 1.964(3) . ?
Cu1 O4 1.965(3) . ?
Cu1 N1 1.989(4) . ?
Cu1 O1 2.222(3) . ?
F1 C1 1.314(5) . ?
F2 C1 1.332(6) . ?
F3 C1 1.324(5) . ?
F4 F5' 1.038(16) . ?
F4 C5 1.301(11) . ?
F4 F4' 1.38(2) . ?
F6 F4' 0.82(2) . ?
F6 C5 1.298(13) . ?
F6 F6' 1.64(2) . ?
F5 F6' 0.67(3) . ?
F5 C5 1.241(11) . ?
F5 F5' 1.50(2) . ?
F4' C5 1.241(11) . ?
F5' C5 1.314(12) . ?
F6' C5 1.291(14) . ?
F7 C6 1.313(13) . ?
F8 F7' 0.59(5) . ?
F8 C6 1.199(17) . ?
F8 F8' 1.53(3) . ?
F9 F8' 0.911(16) . ?
F9 C6 1.358(17) . ?
F9 F9' 1.67(3) . ?
F9' C6 1.240(17) . ?
F8' C6 1.311(14) . ?
F7' C6 1.371(14) . ?
F10 F10' 1.22(3) . ?
F10 C10 1.348(9) . ?
F10 F11' 1.45(3) . ?
F11 F11' 1.047(19) . ?
F11 F12' 1.119(17) . ?
F11 C10 1.243(8) . ?
89
C5 F6 F6' 50.5(8) . . ?
F6' F5 C5 78.8(19) . . ?
F6' F5 F5' 134(2) . . ?
C5 F5 F5' 56.3(8) . . ?
F6 F4' C5 74.9(13) . . ?
F6 F4' F4 132.0(17) . . ?
C5 F4' F4 59.3(8) . . ?
F4 F5' C5 65.9(10) . . ?
F4 F5' F5 108.3(15) . . ?
C5 F5' F5 51.8(7) . . ?
F5 F6' C5 70.5(18) . . ?
F5 F6' F6 115(2) . . ?
C5 F6' F6 50.9(8) . . ?
F7' F8 C6 94(3) . . ?
F7' F8 F8' 146(4) . . ?
C6 F8 F8' 55.8(11) . . ?
F8' F9 C6 67.3(17) . . ?
F8' F9 F9' 109(3) . . ?
C6 F9 F9' 46.9(8) . . ?
C6 F9' F9 53.1(9) . . ?
F9 F8' C6 72.9(17) . . ?
F9 F8' F8 117(3) . . ?
C6 F8' F8 49.2(8) . . ?
F8 F7' C6 61(2) . . ?
F10' F10 C10 52.0(8) . . ?
F10' F10 F11' 102.8(12) . . ?
C10 F10 F11' 57.3(8) . . ?
F11' F11 F12' 141.4(15) . . ?
F11' F11 C10 71.3(11) . . ?
F12' F11 C10 70.1(9) . . ?
F10' F12 C10 55.9(11) . . ?
F10' F12 F12' 108.9(15) . . ?
C10 F12 F12' 55.8(7) . . ?
F11 F12' C10 59.2(8) . . ?
F11 F12' F12 103.2(12) . . ?
C10 F12' F12 54.8(8) . . ?
F11 F11' C10 61.2(9) . . ?
F11 F11' F10 112.7(15) . . ?
C10 F11' F10 57.5(9) . . ?
F12 F10' C10 79.2(16) . . ?
F12 F10' F10 145.7(17) . . ?
C10 F10' F10 69.6(16) . . ?
C4 O1 Cu1 122.2(3) . . ?
C2 O2 Cu1 125.5(2) . . ?
91
C9 O3 Cu1 124.1(3) . . ?
C7 O4 Cu1 123.6(3) . . ?
C11 N1 C12 111.2(4) . . ?
C11 N1 Cu1 116.4(3) . . ?
C12 N1 Cu1 112.1(4) . . ?
F1 C1 F3 107.2(4) . . ?
F1 C1 F2 106.4(4) . . ?
F3 C1 F2 107.7(4) . . ?
F1 C1 C2 112.7(3) . . ?
F3 C1 C2 113.6(4) . . ?
F2 C1 C2 108.8(4) . . ?
O2 C2 C3 130.5(3) . . ?
O2 C2 C1 112.1(3) . . ?
C3 C2 C1 117.4(3) . . ?
C2 C3 C4 123.8(4) . . ?
O1 C4 C3 127.7(4) . . ?
O1 C4 C5 116.1(4) . . ?
C3 C4 C5 116.2(4) . . ?
F4' C5 F5 124.8(11) . . ?
F4' C5 F6' 109.0(12) . . ?
F5 C5 F6' 30.7(15) . . ?
F4' C5 F4 65.6(10) . . ?
F5 C5 F4 109.4(11) . . ?
F6' C5 F4 130.9(10) . . ?
F4' C5 F6 37.6(11) . . ?
F5 C5 F6 105.1(13) . . ?
F6' C5 F6 78.6(12) . . ?
F4 C5 F6 102.1(11) . . ?
F4' C5 F5' 109.6(12) . . ?
F5 C5 F5' 71.9(12) . . ?
F6' C5 F5' 101.9(11) . . ?
F4 C5 F5' 46.8(8) . . ?
F6 C5 F5' 139.1(10) . . ?
F4' C5 C4 115.7(7) . . ?
F5 C5 C4 115.6(8) . . ?
F6' C5 C4 111.8(9) . . ?
F4 C5 C4 113.8(6) . . ?
F6 C5 C4 109.6(8) . . ?
F5' C5 C4 107.9(7) . . ?
F8 C6 F9' 124.5(14) . . ?
F8 C6 F8' 75.0(16) . . ?
F9' C6 F8' 114.5(13) . . ?
F8 C6 F7 110.1(19) . . ?
F9' C6 F7 20.9(18) . . ?
92
F8' C6 F7 129.3(14) . . ?
F8 C6 F9 110.9(12) . . ?
F9' C6 F9 80.0(13) . . ?
F8' C6 F9 39.9(7) . . ?
F7 C6 F9 99.7(11) . . ?
F8 C6 F7' 25(2) . . ?
F9' C6 F7' 107.6(17) . . ?
F8' C6 F7' 99.5(12) . . ?
F7 C6 F7' 89.2(11) . . ?
F9 C6 F7' 131.0(15) . . ?
F8 C6 C7 112.9(8) . . ?
F9' C6 C7 111.9(10) . . ?
F8' C6 C7 112.9(10) . . ?
F7 C6 C7 110.6(8) . . ?
F9 C6 C7 111.9(10) . . ?
F7' C6 C7 109.5(8) . . ?
O4 C7 C8 128.7(4) . . ?
O4 C7 C6 112.6(4) . . ?
C8 C7 C6 118.7(4) . . ?
C7 C8 C9 121.0(4) . . ?
O3 C9 C8 128.6(4) . . ?
O3 C9 C10 113.8(4) . . ?
C8 C9 C10 117.5(4) . . ?
F10' C10 F11 128.2(9) . . ?
F10' C10 F12 45(2) . . ?
F11 C10 F12 108.6(9) . . ?
F10' C10 F11' 115.3(16) . . ?
F11 C10 F11' 47.5(9) . . ?
F12 C10 F11' 137.0(8) . . ?
F10' C10 F10 58.4(19) . . ?
F11 C10 F10 107.5(9) . . ?
F12 C10 F10 102.2(7) . . ?
F11' C10 F10 65.2(12) . . ?
F10' C10 F12' 111.6(19) . . ?
F11 C10 F12' 50.7(8) . . ?
F12 C10 F12' 69.5(11) . . ?
F11' C10 F12' 98.2(12) . . ?
F10 C10 F12' 146.7(8) . . ?
F10' C10 C9 115.4(8) . . ?
F11 C10 C9 116.2(5) . . ?
F12 C10 C9 112.7(6) . . ?
F11' C10 C9 110.3(7) . . ?
F10 C10 C9 108.7(6) . . ?
F12' C10 C9 104.1(6) . . ?
93
loop_
_geom_torsion_atom_site_label_1
_geom_torsion_atom_site_label_2
_geom_torsion_atom_site_label_3
_geom_torsion_atom_site_label_4
_geom_torsion
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_1
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_2
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_3
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_4
_geom_torsion_publ_flag
F6' F6 F4' C5 -28.9(14) . . . . ?
C5 F6 F4' F4 17(2) . . . . ?
F6' F6 F4' F4 -11(4) . . . . ?
F5' F4 F4' F6 3(4) . . . . ?
C5 F4 F4' F6 -20(3) . . . . ?
F5' F4 F4' C5 22.6(13) . . . . ?
F4' F4 F5' C5 -20.0(11) . . . . ?
C5 F4 F5' F5 30.6(9) . . . . ?
F4' F4 F5' F5 10.6(18) . . . . ?
F6' F5 F5' F4 -20(5) . . . . ?
C5 F5 F5' F4 -36.3(11) . . . . ?
F6' F5 F5' C5 16(4) . . . . ?
F5' F5 F6' C5 -13(3) . . . . ?
C5 F5 F6' F6 26(2) . . . . ?
F5' F5 F6' F6 12(5) . . . . ?
F4' F6 F6' F5 4(4) . . . . ?
C5 F6 F6' F5 -32(3) . . . . ?
F4' F6 F6' C5 35.4(19) . . . . ?
F8' F9 F9' C6 -29(2) . . . . ?
F9' F9 F8' C6 22.5(15) . . . . ?
C6 F9 F8' F8 -22.0(18) . . . . ?
F9' F9 F8' F8 0(3) . . . . ?
F7' F8 F8' F9 -2(7) . . . . ?
C6 F8 F8' F9 28(2) . . . . ?
F7' F8 F8' C6 -30(6) . . . . ?
F8' F8 F7' C6 25(5) . . . . ?
F11' F11 F12' C10 2(2) . . . . ?
F11' F11 F12' F12 -32(2) . . . . ?
C10 F11 F12' F12 -33.9(7) . . . . ?
F10' F12 F12' F11 17.6(18) . . . . ?
C10 F12 F12' F11 36.0(8) . . . . ?
F10' F12 F12' C10 -18.4(14) . . . . ?
F12' F11 F11' C10 -2(2) . . . . ?
94
C1 C2 C3 C4 175.4(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C4 C3 -2.9(6) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C4 C5 175.6(3) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 O1 -3.1(7) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 C5 178.3(4) . . . . ?
F6 F4' C5 F5 68(3) . . . . ?
F4 F4' C5 F5 -97.4(16) . . . . ?
F6 F4' C5 F6' 38(2) . . . . ?
F4 F4' C5 F6' -127.1(11) . . . . ?
F6 F4' C5 F4 165(2) . . . . ?
F4 F4' C5 F6 -165(2) . . . . ?
F6 F4' C5 F5' 148.6(18) . . . . ?
F4 F4' C5 F5' -16.4(10) . . . . ?
F6 F4' C5 C4 -89.1(18) . . . . ?
F4 F4' C5 C4 105.9(8) . . . . ?
F6' F5 C5 F4' -67(3) . . . . ?
F5' F5 C5 F4' 101.6(16) . . . . ?
F5' F5 C5 F6' 168(3) . . . . ?
F6' F5 C5 F4 -140(3) . . . . ?
F5' F5 C5 F4 28.4(11) . . . . ?
F6' F5 C5 F6 -31(3) . . . . ?
F5' F5 C5 F6 137.4(11) . . . . ?
F6' F5 C5 F5' -168(3) . . . . ?
F6' F5 C5 C4 90(3) . . . . ?
F5' F5 C5 C4 -101.7(9) . . . . ?
F5 F6' C5 F4' 127(3) . . . . ?
F6 F6' C5 F4' -22.5(15) . . . . ?
F6 F6' C5 F5 -150(3) . . . . ?
F5 F6' C5 F4 53(3) . . . . ?
F6 F6' C5 F4 -96.2(16) . . . . ?
F5 F6' C5 F6 150(3) . . . . ?
F5 F6' C5 F5' 11(3) . . . . ?
F6 F6' C5 F5' -138.2(10) . . . . ?
F5 F6' C5 C4 -104(3) . . . . ?
F6 F6' C5 C4 106.7(10) . . . . ?
F5' F4 C5 F4' -158.6(13) . . . . ?
F5' F4 C5 F5 -38.3(15) . . . . ?
F4' F4 C5 F5 120.3(12) . . . . ?
F5' F4 C5 F6' -64.0(19) . . . . ?
F4' F4 C5 F6' 94.6(16) . . . . ?
F5' F4 C5 F6 -149.3(12) . . . . ?
F4' F4 C5 F6 9.3(12) . . . . ?
F4' F4 C5 F5' 158.6(13) . . . . ?
F5' F4 C5 C4 92.7(11) . . . . ?
96
F4' F4 C5 C4 -108.7(8) . . . . ?
F6' F6 C5 F4' 144(2) . . . . ?
F4' F6 C5 F5 -128.2(19) . . . . ?
F6' F6 C5 F5 15.5(16) . . . . ?
F4' F6 C5 F6' -144(2) . . . . ?
F4' F6 C5 F4 -14.0(19) . . . . ?
F6' F6 C5 F4 129.7(10) . . . . ?
F4' F6 C5 F5' -49(3) . . . . ?
F6' F6 C5 F5' 95.1(16) . . . . ?
F4' F6 C5 C4 107.0(18) . . . . ?
F6' F6 C5 C4 -109.3(10) . . . . ?
F4 F5' C5 F4' 20.6(13) . . . . ?
F5 F5' C5 F4' -121.4(11) . . . . ?
F4 F5' C5 F5 142.0(14) . . . . ?
F4 F5' C5 F6' 136.0(13) . . . . ?
F5 F5' C5 F6' -6.0(16) . . . . ?
F5 F5' C5 F4 -142.0(14) . . . . ?
F4 F5' C5 F6 50(2) . . . . ?
F5 F5' C5 F6 -92.4(17) . . . . ?
F4 F5' C5 C4 -106.1(10) . . . . ?
F5 F5' C5 C4 111.8(9) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F4' 145.0(15) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F4' -36.3(15) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F5 -13.9(17) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F5 164.8(16) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F6' 19.4(12) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F6' -161.9(11) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F4 -141.8(13) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F4 36.9(14) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F6 104.6(12) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F6 -76.7(12) . . . . ?
O1 C4 C5 F5' -91.9(11) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F5' 86.8(11) . . . . ?
F7' F8 C6 F9' 54(3) . . . . ?
F8' F8 C6 F9' -109.7(18) . . . . ?
F7' F8 C6 F8' 164(3) . . . . ?
F7' F8 C6 F7 37(3) . . . . ?
F8' F8 C6 F7 -126.9(18) . . . . ?
F7' F8 C6 F9 146(3) . . . . ?
F8' F8 C6 F9 -17.6(18) . . . . ?
F8' F8 C6 F7' -164(3) . . . . ?
F7' F8 C6 C7 -87(3) . . . . ?
F8' F8 C6 C7 108.9(9) . . . . ?
F9 F9' C6 F8 108.6(16) . . . . ?
97
C6 C7 C8 C9 -173.9(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C9 C8 -8.7(6) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C9 C10 171.6(3) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C9 O3 -2.5(7) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C9 C10 177.3(4) . . . . ?
F12 F10' C10 F11 -78(2) . . . . ?
F10 F10' C10 F11 88(2) . . . . ?
F10 F10' C10 F12 165.5(17) . . . . ?
F12 F10' C10 F11' -132.2(15) . . . . ?
F10 F10' C10 F11' 33.3(14) . . . . ?
F12 F10' C10 F10 -165.5(17) . . . . ?
F12 F10' C10 F12' -21.3(17) . . . . ?
F10 F10' C10 F12' 144.2(11) . . . . ?
F12 F10' C10 C9 97.3(16) . . . . ?
F10 F10' C10 C9 -97.2(11) . . . . ?
F11' F11 C10 F10' -91(3) . . . . ?
F12' F11 C10 F10' 88(3) . . . . ?
F11' F11 C10 F12 -137.6(12) . . . . ?
F12' F11 C10 F12 41.1(10) . . . . ?
F12' F11 C10 F11' 178.7(14) . . . . ?
F11' F11 C10 F10 -27.7(13) . . . . ?
F12' F11 C10 F10 150.9(10) . . . . ?
F11' F11 C10 F12' -178.7(14) . . . . ?
F11' F11 C10 C9 94.3(11) . . . . ?
F12' F11 C10 C9 -87.1(10) . . . . ?
F12' F12 C10 F10' -158.9(17) . . . . ?
F10' F12 C10 F11 126.0(15) . . . . ?
F12' F12 C10 F11 -32.9(8) . . . . ?
F10' F12 C10 F11' 79(2) . . . . ?
F12' F12 C10 F11' -80(2) . . . . ?
F10' F12 C10 F10 12.6(14) . . . . ?
F12' F12 C10 F10 -146.3(9) . . . . ?
F10' F12 C10 F12' 158.9(17) . . . . ?
F10' F12 C10 C9 -103.9(14) . . . . ?
F12' F12 C10 C9 97.2(8) . . . . ?
F11 F11' C10 F10' 119.7(18) . . . . ?
F10 F11' C10 F10' -31.0(17) . . . . ?
F10 F11' C10 F11 -150.7(12) . . . . ?
F11 F11' C10 F12 70(2) . . . . ?
F10 F11' C10 F12 -81.1(18) . . . . ?
F11 F11' C10 F10 150.7(12) . . . . ?
F11 F11' C10 F12' 1.0(11) . . . . ?
F10 F11' C10 F12' -149.7(9) . . . . ?
F11 F11' C10 C9 -107.4(9) . . . . ?
99
100
12.439(4)
18.078(6)
101
_cell_length_c
12.896(4)
_cell_angle_alpha
90
_cell_angle_beta
98.383(17)
_cell_angle_gamma
90
_cell_volume
2869.0(16)
_cell_formula_units_Z
4
_cell_measurement_temperature 100
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 20572
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
30.0
_exptl_crystal_description
needle
_exptl_crystal_colour
yellow
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.27
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.07
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.08
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.822
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
1564
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 0.917
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.781
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.937
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
100
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number
7941
102
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.036
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0776
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
0
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
17
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
0
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
25
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-18
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
17
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.13
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
30.04
_reflns_number_total
7941
_reflns_number_gt
5519
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution 'SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 1990)'
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0733P)^2^] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
SHELXL
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
0.0310(15)
103
_refine_ls_extinction_expression
'Fc^*^=kFc[1+0.001xFc^2^\l^3^/sin(2\q)]^-1/4^'
_refine_ls_number_reflns
7941
_refine_ls_number_parameters
420
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.1046
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.0628
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.1533
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.1337
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 1.165
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
1.165
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.006
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.001
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.09017(3) 0.22398(2) 0.46468(3) 0.01021(12) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F1 F 0.16299(18) 0.41959(13) 0.20175(15) 0.0299(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F -0.01041(18) 0.42692(12) 0.19097(15) 0.0298(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F 0.06294(16) 0.32860(11) 0.13876(13) 0.0212(4) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4 F 0.12860(17) 0.50609(10) 0.55438(15) 0.0254(4) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F5 F 0.22218(17) 0.42461(12) 0.65076(16) 0.0287(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F6 F 0.05187(18) 0.43755(12) 0.65848(16) 0.0283(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F7 F 0.49742(16) 0.29337(12) 0.49404(16) 0.0270(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F8 F 0.47047(16) 0.34238(12) 0.64001(15) 0.0281(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F9 F 0.38463(16) 0.38316(11) 0.49470(17) 0.0279(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F10 F 0.33223(16) 0.15858(12) 0.82894(15) 0.0266(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F11 F 0.24689(19) 0.06997(12) 0.74132(18) 0.0347(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F12 F 0.15781(17) 0.15335(14) 0.81134(16) 0.0343(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F13 F 0.09804(19) 0.02162(13) 0.23428(18) 0.0358(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F14 F -0.0050(2) -0.04322(15) 0.3195(3) 0.0692(11) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F15 F 0.15536(19) -0.01409(12) 0.39069(19) 0.0365(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
104
F4 C5 1.336(2) . ?
F5 C5 1.329(2) . ?
F6 C5 1.336(2) . ?
F7 C9 1.350(4) . ?
F8 C9 1.328(4) . ?
F9 C9 1.327(4) . ?
F10 C10 1.340(4) . ?
F11 C10 1.328(4) . ?
F12 C10 1.331(4) . ?
F13 C14 1.334(4) . ?
F14 C14 1.324(4) . ?
F15 C14 1.341(4) . ?
F16 C15 1.326(4) . ?
F17 C15 1.319(4) . ?
F18 C15 1.330(4) . ?
O1 C1 1.243(4) . ?
O2 C3 1.263(3) . ?
O3 C6 1.255(4) . ?
O4 C8 1.265(4) . ?
O5 C11 1.267(4) . ?
O6 C13 1.241(4) . ?
N1 C20 1.505(4) . ?
N1 C16 1.510(4) . ?
N1 C18 1.515(4) . ?
N1 H1 0.84(4) . ?
C1 C2 1.402(3) . ?
C1 C4 1.531(3) . ?
C2 C3 1.3829 . ?
C2 H2 0.9595 . ?
C3 C5 1.5321 . ?
C6 C7 1.395(4) . ?
C6 C9 1.538(4) . ?
C7 C8 1.396(4) . ?
C7 H7 0.9595 . ?
C8 C10 1.535(4) . ?
C11 C12 1.374(4) . ?
C11 C14 1.531(5) . ?
C12 C13 1.419(5) . ?
C12 H12 0.9593 . ?
C13 C15 1.535(4) . ?
C16 C17 1.509(5) . ?
C16 H16A 0.9599 . ?
C16 H16B 0.9650 . ?
C17 H17A 0.9705 . ?
108
112
10.7570(5)
11.7170(5)
12.8520(5)
113
_cell_angle_alpha
91.949(3)
_cell_angle_beta
99.782(3)
_cell_angle_gamma
110.015(3)
_cell_volume
1492.45(11)
_cell_formula_units_Z
2
_cell_measurement_temperature 100
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 14109
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
27.5
_exptl_crystal_description
lath
_exptl_crystal_colour
yellow
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.48
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.10
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.05
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.791
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
802
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 0.886
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.6758
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.9571
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
100
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number
10812
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.031
114
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0729
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
-11
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
-15
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
14
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-16
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
16
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.58
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
27.53
_reflns_number_total
6763
_reflns_number_gt
4108
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution 'SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 1990)'
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0822P)^2^] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
6763
115
_refine_ls_number_parameters
442
_refine_ls_number_restraints
2
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.0892
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.0527
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.1517
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.1406
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 1.015
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
1.015
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.096
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.002
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.36581(4) 0.27148(4) 0.24308(3) 0.03844(15) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F1 F -0.0752(2) 0.2351(2) -0.02909(16) 0.0592(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F 0.0571(2) 0.41556(19) 0.03524(19) 0.0677(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F -0.0475(2) 0.2927(2) 0.13670(16) 0.0572(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4 F 0.1406(2) -0.03161(19) -0.11104(18) 0.0618(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F5 F 0.3375(3) -0.0192(2) -0.03543(18) 0.0778(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F6 F 0.3099(3) 0.1099(2) -0.14412(17) 0.0644(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F7 F 0.8507(3) 0.2562(3) 0.3564(4) 0.1412(17) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F8 F 0.6921(4) 0.0925(3) 0.2887(2) 0.1045(11) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F9 F 0.7009(3) 0.1672(3) 0.44034(18) 0.0837(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F10 F 0.8196(3) 0.5551(3) 0.1392(2) 0.0910(9) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F11 F 0.7200(3) 0.6519(2) 0.2118(2) 0.0850(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F12 F 0.6324(3) 0.5603(3) 0.05786(19) 0.0837(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F13 F 0.1421(3) 0.3512(2) 0.5717(2) 0.0843(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F14 F 0.1664(6) 0.4751(3) 0.4616(3) 0.154(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F15 F 0.3342(4) 0.4708(5) 0.5612(3) 0.178(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F16 F -0.0698(2) -0.0258(2) 0.36825(18) 0.0641(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F17 F 0.0997(3) -0.08313(19) 0.41386(16) 0.0652(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F18 F 0.0170(3) -0.0890(2) 0.24889(16) 0.0734(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
116
F3 C4 1.328(4) . ?
F4 C5 1.334(4) . ?
F5 C5 1.320(4) . ?
F6 C5 1.332(4) . ?
F7 C9 1.309(5) . ?
F8 C9 1.306(5) . ?
F9 C9 1.307(5) . ?
F10 C10 1.324(5) . ?
F11 C10 1.326(5) . ?
F12 C10 1.292(4) . ?
F13 C14 1.280(5) . ?
F14 C14 1.284(6) . ?
F15 C14 1.303(5) . ?
F16 C15 1.335(5) . ?
F17 C15 1.344(4) . ?
F18 C15 1.336(4) . ?
O1 C1 1.263(4) . ?
O2 C3 1.251(4) . ?
O3 C6 1.248(4) . ?
O4 C8 1.255(4) . ?
O5 C11 1.244(4) . ?
O6 C13 1.262(4) . ?
O1W H1W 0.885(19) . ?
O1W H2W 0.914(19) . ?
N1 C20 1.491(5) . ?
N1 C18 1.497(5) . ?
N1 C16 1.516(5) . ?
N1 H1 0.9300 . ?
C1 C2 1.388(4) . ?
C1 C4 1.525(5) . ?
C2 C3 1.384(5) . ?
C2 H2 0.9500 . ?
C3 C5 1.535(5) . ?
C6 C7 1.381(5) . ?
C6 C9 1.534(5) . ?
C7 C8 1.383(5) . ?
C7 H7 0.9500 . ?
C8 C10 1.543(5) . ?
C11 C12 1.389(5) . ?
C11 C14 1.520(5) . ?
C12 C13 1.373(5) . ?
C12 H12 0.9500 . ?
C13 C15 1.538(6) . ?
C16 C17 1.487(6) . ?
120
C8 O4 Cu1 123.1(2) . . ?
C11 O5 Cu1 122.3(2) . . ?
C13 O6 Cu1 125.2(2) . . ?
H1W O1W H2W 118(4) . . ?
C20 N1 C18 111.5(3) . . ?
C20 N1 C16 111.0(3) . . ?
C18 N1 C16 110.8(3) . . ?
C20 N1 H1 107.8 . . ?
C18 N1 H1 107.8 . . ?
C16 N1 H1 107.8 . . ?
O1 C1 C2 129.3(3) . . ?
O1 C1 C4 111.9(3) . . ?
C2 C1 C4 118.7(3) . . ?
C3 C2 C1 123.4(3) . . ?
C3 C2 H2 118.3 . . ?
C1 C2 H2 118.3 . . ?
O2 C3 C2 128.6(3) . . ?
O2 C3 C5 114.6(3) . . ?
C2 C3 C5 116.8(3) . . ?
F3 C4 F2 106.8(3) . . ?
F3 C4 F1 107.2(3) . . ?
F2 C4 F1 106.6(3) . . ?
F3 C4 C1 111.6(3) . . ?
F2 C4 C1 110.7(3) . . ?
F1 C4 C1 113.5(3) . . ?
F5 C5 F6 108.7(3) . . ?
F5 C5 F4 106.7(3) . . ?
F6 C5 F4 105.3(3) . . ?
F5 C5 C3 112.9(3) . . ?
F6 C5 C3 110.3(3) . . ?
F4 C5 C3 112.6(3) . . ?
O3 C6 C7 129.0(3) . . ?
O3 C6 C9 113.1(3) . . ?
C7 C6 C9 117.9(3) . . ?
C6 C7 C8 121.7(3) . . ?
C6 C7 H7 119.1 . . ?
C8 C7 H7 119.1 . . ?
O4 C8 C7 128.0(3) . . ?
O4 C8 C10 113.4(3) . . ?
C7 C8 C10 118.6(3) . . ?
F8 C9 F9 105.7(4) . . ?
F8 C9 F7 108.3(4) . . ?
F9 C9 F7 106.0(4) . . ?
F8 C9 C6 110.9(3) . . ?
122
F9 C9 C6 112.0(3) . . ?
F7 C9 C6 113.5(3) . . ?
F12 C10 F10 108.8(4) . . ?
F12 C10 F11 108.0(4) . . ?
F10 C10 F11 104.8(3) . . ?
F12 C10 C8 112.6(3) . . ?
F10 C10 C8 112.2(3) . . ?
F11 C10 C8 110.2(3) . . ?
O5 C11 C12 129.6(3) . . ?
O5 C11 C14 114.2(3) . . ?
C12 C11 C14 116.1(3) . . ?
C13 C12 C11 122.7(3) . . ?
C13 C12 H12 118.6 . . ?
C11 C12 H12 118.6 . . ?
O6 C13 C12 128.7(4) . . ?
O6 C13 C15 114.1(3) . . ?
C12 C13 C15 117.1(3) . . ?
F13 C14 F14 105.7(4) . . ?
F13 C14 F15 108.2(4) . . ?
F14 C14 F15 104.4(5) . . ?
F13 C14 C11 116.5(3) . . ?
F14 C14 C11 109.8(3) . . ?
F15 C14 C11 111.3(4) . . ?
F16 C15 F18 107.8(3) . . ?
F16 C15 F17 106.8(3) . . ?
F18 C15 F17 106.3(3) . . ?
F16 C15 C13 114.0(3) . . ?
F18 C15 C13 111.8(3) . . ?
F17 C15 C13 109.8(3) . . ?
C17 C16 N1 112.6(3) . . ?
C17 C16 H16A 109.1 . . ?
N1 C16 H16A 109.1 . . ?
C17 C16 H16B 109.1 . . ?
N1 C16 H16B 109.1 . . ?
H16A C16 H16B 107.8 . . ?
C16 C17 H17A 109.5 . . ?
C16 C17 H17B 109.5 . . ?
H17A C17 H17B 109.5 . . ?
C16 C17 H17C 109.5 . . ?
H17A C17 H17C 109.5 . . ?
H17B C17 H17C 109.5 . . ?
N1 C18 C19 113.7(3) . . ?
N1 C18 H18A 108.8 . . ?
C19 C18 H18A 108.8 . . ?
123
O4 Cu1 O3 C6 -19.3(3) . . . . ?
O6 Cu1 O3 C6 159.1(3) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O3 C6 -115.5(3) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O3 C6 72.5(3) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O4 C8 -159.8(3) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O4 C8 18.3(3) . . . . ?
O6 Cu1 O4 C8 -18(2) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O4 C8 115.1(3) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O4 C8 -70.9(3) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O5 C11 68.8(3) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O5 C11 -110.7(3) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O5 C11 159.1(3) . . . . ?
O6 Cu1 O5 C11 -22.8(3) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O5 C11 16.4(6) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O6 C13 -61.5(3) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O6 C13 120.3(3) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O6 C13 156(2) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O6 C13 23.4(3) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O6 C13 -150.3(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C1 C2 -11.9(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O1 C1 C4 170.4(2) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C2 C3 -3.1(5) . . . . ?
C4 C1 C2 C3 174.4(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C3 C2 9.1(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C3 C5 -173.9(2) . . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 O2 3.5(6) . . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 C5 -173.4(3) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C4 F3 -53.3(4) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F3 128.8(3) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C4 F2 65.6(4) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F2 -112.3(3) . . . . ?
O1 C1 C4 F1 -174.6(3) . . . . ?
C2 C1 C4 F1 7.5(4) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F5 26.3(4) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F5 -156.3(3) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F6 -95.5(3) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F6 81.9(4) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C5 F4 147.2(3) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C5 F4 -35.4(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C6 C7 12.4(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C6 C9 -167.5(2) . . . . ?
O3 C6 C7 C8 4.0(6) . . . . ?
C9 C6 C7 C8 -176.1(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 O4 C8 C7 -10.2(5) . . . . ?
125
_geom_hbond_atom_site_label_H
_geom_hbond_atom_site_label_A
_geom_hbond_distance_DH
_geom_hbond_distance_HA
_geom_hbond_distance_DA
_geom_hbond_angle_DHA
_geom_hbond_site_symmetry_A
N1 H1 O1W 0.93 1.89 2.821(4) 176.0 .
O1W H1W O6 0.885(19) 2.17(4) 2.826(4) 131(4) 1_565
O1W H2W O2 0.914(19) 2.56(4) 3.140(4) 122(4) 1_565
_diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_max 0.986
_diffrn_reflns_theta_full
27.53
_diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full 0.986
_refine_diff_density_max 0.602
_refine_diff_density_min -0.457
_refine_diff_density_rms 0.072
#END OF CIF
127
9.396(2)
11.998(3)
128
_cell_length_c
18.353(5)
_cell_angle_alpha
93.892(13)
_cell_angle_beta
102.170(14)
_cell_angle_gamma
108.929(14)
_cell_volume
1892.2(8)
_cell_formula_units_Z
2
_cell_measurement_temperature 170
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 21176
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
30.0
_exptl_crystal_description
fragment
_exptl_crystal_colour
'emerald green'
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.40
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.35
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.22
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.886
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
1060
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 1.292
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.596
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.753
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
170
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number 18538
129
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.031
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0431
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
0
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
-16
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
15
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-25
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
24
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.7
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
30.0
_reflns_number_total
10952
_reflns_number_gt
7417
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution 'SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 1990)'
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.1172P)^2^] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
130
_refine_ls_number_reflns
10952
_refine_ls_number_parameters
667
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.078
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.054
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.181
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.167
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 1.075
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
1.075
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.002
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.000
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.54474(4) 0.36712(3) 0.695199(18) 0.03366(11) Uani 1 1 d . . .
Cu2 Cu 0.51250(4) 0.21180(3) 0.819500(19) 0.03722(12) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O1 O 0.4188(2) 0.31891(18) 0.76887(11) 0.0378(4) Uani 1 1 d . . .
H1OH H 0.4541 0.3780 0.8025 0.057 Uiso 1 1 d R . .
O2 O 0.6833(2) 0.3819(2) 0.62790(12) 0.0454(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O3 O 0.3614(2) 0.3005(2) 0.61194(12) 0.0458(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O4 O 0.7279(2) 0.42863(18) 0.78194(11) 0.0398(4) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O5 O 0.5479(3) 0.55096(19) 0.69069(13) 0.0474(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O6 O 0.6448(3) 0.1266(2) 0.86734(13) 0.0491(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O7 O 0.5228(2) 0.29534(19) 0.91546(11) 0.0426(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O8 O 0.5297(3) 0.15163(19) 0.72123(12) 0.0444(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O9 O 0.3037(3) 0.0532(2) 0.80903(13) 0.0521(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
N1 N 0.0877(3) 0.2704(3) 0.74612(16) 0.0513(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
H1N H 0.1961 0.2816 0.7497 0.077 Uiso 1 1 d R . .
C1 C 0.7715(5) 0.3982(5) 0.5180(2) 0.0762(13) Uani 1 1 d . . .
C2 C 0.6401(4) 0.3758(3) 0.55834(18) 0.0466(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
C3 C 0.4925(4) 0.3474(3) 0.51375(18) 0.0501(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
131
O3 C4 1.269(4) . ?
O4 C7 1.260(4) . ?
O5 C9 1.235(4) . ?
O6 C12 1.250(4) . ?
O7 C14 1.256(4) . ?
O8 C17 1.263(4) . ?
O9 C19 1.217(4) . ?
N1 C25B 1.439(8) . ?
N1 C21A 1.458(8) . ?
N1 C23B 1.556(8) . ?
N1 C23A 1.563(7) . ?
N1 C21B 1.584(9) . ?
N1 C25A 1.588(8) . ?
N1 H1N 0.9703 . ?
C1 F1 1.311(6) . ?
C1 F2 1.326(5) . ?
C1 F3 1.329(7) . ?
C1 C2 1.530(5) . ?
C2 C3 1.373(5) . ?
C3 C4 1.377(5) . ?
C3 H3 0.9500 . ?
C4 C5 1.538(5) . ?
C5 F5 1.258(8) . ?
C5 F4 1.306(5) . ?
C5 F6 1.394(8) . ?
C6 F7 1.304(4) . ?
C6 F9 1.312(4) . ?
C6 F8 1.313(4) . ?
C6 C7 1.548(4) . ?
C7 C8 1.369(4) . ?
C8 C9 1.400(4) . ?
C8 H8 0.9500 . ?
C9 C10 1.535(5) . ?
C10 F11A 1.267(8) . ?
C10 F12A 1.274(8) . ?
C10 F12B 1.275(9) . ?
C10 F10B 1.299(8) . ?
C10 F10A 1.318(7) . ?
C10 F11B 1.348(9) . ?
C11 F14 1.223(5) . ?
C11 F15 1.309(6) . ?
C11 F13 1.310(5) . ?
C11 C12 1.532(5) . ?
C12 C13 1.400(5) . ?
136
C3 C2 C1 116.8(3) . . ?
C2 C3 C4 120.5(3) . . ?
C2 C3 H3 119.7 . . ?
C4 C3 H3 119.7 . . ?
O3 C4 C3 129.0(3) . . ?
O3 C4 C5 113.1(3) . . ?
C3 C4 C5 117.7(3) . . ?
F5 C5 F4 109.9(6) . . ?
F5 C5 F6 109.9(5) . . ?
F4 C5 F6 104.0(5) . . ?
F5 C5 C4 111.0(5) . . ?
F4 C5 C4 112.6(4) . . ?
F6 C5 C4 109.2(5) . . ?
F7 C6 F9 108.2(3) . . ?
F7 C6 F8 105.9(3) . . ?
F9 C6 F8 105.7(3) . . ?
F7 C6 C7 113.7(3) . . ?
F9 C6 C7 112.0(3) . . ?
F8 C6 C7 111.0(3) . . ?
O4 C7 C8 130.7(3) . . ?
O4 C7 C6 112.4(3) . . ?
C8 C7 C6 116.9(3) . . ?
C7 C8 C9 123.4(3) . . ?
C7 C8 H8 118.3 . . ?
C9 C8 H8 118.3 . . ?
O5 C9 C8 128.5(3) . . ?
O5 C9 C10 113.9(3) . . ?
C8 C9 C10 117.6(3) . . ?
F11A C10 F12A 112.7(8) . . ?
F11A C10 F12B 133.3(6) . . ?
F12A C10 F12B 43.6(8) . . ?
F11A C10 F10B 57.8(7) . . ?
F12A C10 F10B 135.6(5) . . ?
F12B C10 F10B 107.4(9) . . ?
F11A C10 F10A 106.5(6) . . ?
F12A C10 F10A 106.1(7) . . ?
F12B C10 F10A 63.7(8) . . ?
F10B C10 F10A 50.7(7) . . ?
F11A C10 F11B 46.7(7) . . ?
F12A C10 F11B 68.4(8) . . ?
F12B C10 F11B 105.0(9) . . ?
F10B C10 F11B 99.8(8) . . ?
F10A C10 F11B 133.9(5) . . ?
F11A C10 C9 110.0(4) . . ?
140
_geom_torsion
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_1
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_2
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_3
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_4
_geom_torsion_publ_flag
O3 Cu1 Cu2 O7 -121.68(10) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 Cu2 O7 129.96(11) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 Cu2 O7 -54.86(12) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 Cu2 O7 58.71(9) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 Cu2 O7 -8.94(11) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 Cu2 O8 65.47(11) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 Cu2 O8 -42.88(12) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 Cu2 O8 132.30(12) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 Cu2 O8 -114.14(10) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 Cu2 O8 178.22(11) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 Cu2 O1 -66.82(11) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 Cu2 O1 -175.18(12) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 Cu2 O1 113.57(11) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 Cu2 O1 45.92(12) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 Cu2 O6 121.91(11) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 Cu2 O6 13.55(13) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 Cu2 O6 -171.27(13) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 Cu2 O6 -57.70(11) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 Cu2 O6 -125.35(12) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 Cu2 O9 -1.20(10) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 Cu2 O9 -109.55(12) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 Cu2 O9 65.63(12) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 Cu2 O9 179.19(10) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 Cu2 O9 111.55(11) . . . . ?
O7 Cu2 O1 Cu1 131.74(10) . . . . ?
O8 Cu2 O1 Cu1 -39.19(9) . . . . ?
O6 Cu2 O1 Cu1 35.6(5) . . . . ?
O9 Cu2 O1 Cu1 -127.97(9) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O1 Cu2 119.66(10) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O1 Cu2 16.3(4) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O1 Cu2 -58.61(9) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O1 Cu2 -146.80(9) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O2 C2 15.5(3) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O2 C2 118.7(4) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O2 C2 -166.6(3) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O2 C2 -77.9(3) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 O2 C2 131.7(2) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O3 C4 -16.0(3) . . . . ?
145
O1 Cu1 O3 C4 177.3(3) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O3 C4 -138.9(19) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O3 C4 76.6(3) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 O3 C4 -147.2(2) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O4 C7 -126.7(19) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O4 C7 110.4(2) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O4 C7 -82.9(2) . . . . ?
O5 Cu1 O4 C7 17.9(2) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 O4 C7 -118.2(2) . . . . ?
O3 Cu1 O5 C9 163.6(2) . . . . ?
O2 Cu1 O5 C9 -104.1(2) . . . . ?
O1 Cu1 O5 C9 71.9(2) . . . . ?
O4 Cu1 O5 C9 -14.9(2) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 O5 C9 44.4(3) . . . . ?
O7 Cu2 O6 C12 9.8(3) . . . . ?
O8 Cu2 O6 C12 -179.7(3) . . . . ?
O1 Cu2 O6 C12 105.6(5) . . . . ?
O9 Cu2 O6 C12 -90.5(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu2 O6 C12 135.0(2) . . . . ?
O8 Cu2 O7 C14 -107.0(6) . . . . ?
O1 Cu2 O7 C14 -177.9(2) . . . . ?
O6 Cu2 O7 C14 -9.2(2) . . . . ?
O9 Cu2 O7 C14 81.6(2) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu2 O7 C14 -146.6(2) . . . . ?
O7 Cu2 O8 C17 179.4(5) . . . . ?
O1 Cu2 O8 C17 -109.6(3) . . . . ?
O6 Cu2 O8 C17 81.4(3) . . . . ?
O9 Cu2 O8 C17 -9.1(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu2 O8 C17 -137.7(3) . . . . ?
O7 Cu2 O9 C19 -170.0(2) . . . . ?
O8 Cu2 O9 C19 11.5(3) . . . . ?
O1 Cu2 O9 C19 99.2(3) . . . . ?
O6 Cu2 O9 C19 -77.6(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu2 O9 C19 63.1(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C2 C3 -6.8(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O2 C2 C1 176.2(3) . . . . ?
F1 C1 C2 O2 -32.8(6) . . . . ?
F2 C1 C2 O2 -153.9(4) . . . . ?
F3 C1 C2 O2 83.2(5) . . . . ?
F1 C1 C2 C3 149.8(4) . . . . ?
F2 C1 C2 C3 28.7(6) . . . . ?
F3 C1 C2 C3 -94.3(4) . . . . ?
O2 C2 C3 C4 -7.4(6) . . . . ?
C1 C2 C3 C4 169.6(4) . . . . ?
146
Cu1 O3 C4 C3 8.2(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O3 C4 C5 -175.8(3) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 O3 6.6(6) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 C5 -169.2(4) . . . . ?
O3 C4 C5 F5 -81.7(6) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F5 94.8(6) . . . . ?
O3 C4 C5 F4 42.0(7) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F4 -141.6(5) . . . . ?
O3 C4 C5 F6 157.0(4) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F6 -26.6(6) . . . . ?
Cu1 O4 C7 C8 -14.6(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 O4 C7 C6 167.70(18) . . . . ?
F7 C6 C7 O4 -158.8(3) . . . . ?
F9 C6 C7 O4 -35.9(4) . . . . ?
F8 C6 C7 O4 81.9(3) . . . . ?
F7 C6 C7 C8 23.2(4) . . . . ?
F9 C6 C7 C8 146.1(3) . . . . ?
F8 C6 C7 C8 -96.1(3) . . . . ?
O4 C7 C8 C9 -0.2(5) . . . . ?
C6 C7 C8 C9 177.4(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 O5 C9 C8 7.5(5) . . . . ?
Cu1 O5 C9 C10 -173.1(2) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C9 O5 3.3(6) . . . . ?
C7 C8 C9 C10 -176.1(3) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F11A 63.1(8) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F11A -117.4(8) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F12A -61.1(9) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F12A 118.4(8) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F12B -108.0(13) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F12B 71.4(13) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F10B 125.9(11) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F10B -54.6(12) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F10A -178.5(7) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F10A 0.9(8) . . . . ?
O5 C9 C10 F11B 12.8(12) . . . . ?
C8 C9 C10 F11B -167.7(12) . . . . ?
Cu2 O6 C12 C13 -6.4(5) . . . . ?
Cu2 O6 C12 C11 172.8(2) . . . . ?
F14 C11 C12 O6 -101.2(6) . . . . ?
F15 C11 C12 O6 132.5(4) . . . . ?
F13 C11 C12 O6 20.4(5) . . . . ?
F14 C11 C12 C13 78.1(6) . . . . ?
F15 C11 C12 C13 -48.2(5) . . . . ?
F13 C11 C12 C13 -160.3(4) . . . . ?
147
157
'
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.1841P)^2^+13.1166P] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment constr
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_abs_structure_details
'Flack H D (1983), Acta Cryst. A39, 876-881'
_refine_ls_abs_structure_Flack -0.04(2)
_refine_ls_number_reflns
8557
_refine_ls_number_parameters
446
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.115
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.090
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.2794
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.2367
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 1.108
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
1.108
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.001
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.000
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.54334(5) 0.45666(5) 0.7500 0.0174(2) Uani 1 2 d S . .
Cu2 Cu 0.32397(6) 0.43173(6) 0.71883(2) 0.01797(19) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F1 F 0.1091(4) 0.5379(4) 0.78476(19) 0.0389(11) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F 0.0740(3) 0.6871(4) 0.76836(18) 0.0411(12) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F 0.1432(4) 0.6547(4) 0.82707(16) 0.0398(12) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4 F 0.1707(6) 0.6858(5) 0.6486(2) 0.065(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F5 F 0.0459(4) 0.6027(5) 0.62932(19) 0.0516(16) Uani 1 1 d . . .
161
;
loop_
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_1
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_2
_geom_bond_distance
_geom_bond_site_symmetry_2
_geom_bond_publ_flag
Cu1 O1 1.931(5) . ?
Cu1 O1 1.931(5) 5_666 ?
Cu1 O7 1.949(5) 5_666 ?
Cu1 O7 1.949(5) . ?
Cu2 O1 1.943(5) . ?
Cu2 O4 1.958(5) . ?
Cu2 O3 1.974(5) . ?
Cu2 O6 1.980(5) . ?
Cu2 O5 2.271(5) . ?
F1 C1 1.316(9) . ?
F2 C1 1.340(9) . ?
F3 C1 1.327(9) . ?
F4 C4 1.337(11) . ?
F5 C4 1.312(9) . ?
F6 C4 1.307(10) . ?
F7 C8 1.332(15) . ?
F8 C8 1.292(11) . ?
F9 C8 1.247(18) . ?
F10 C9 1.315(9) . ?
F11 C9 1.342(11) . ?
F12 C9 1.325(10) . ?
F13 C13 1.328(8) . ?
F14 C13 1.339(9) . ?
F15 C13 1.332(9) . ?
F16 C14 1.314(12) . ?
F17 C14 1.320(11) . ?
F18 C14 1.321(13) . ?
O1 H1O 0.88 . ?
O2 C2 1.244(8) . ?
O3 C5 1.246(8) . ?
O4 C7 1.237(9) . ?
O5 C10 1.229(8) . ?
O6 C12 1.263(8) . ?
O7 C15 1.279(9) . ?
C1 C2 1.561(9) . ?
C2 C3 1.396(7) . ?
165
C3 C2 1.396(7) 5_666 ?
C3 H3 0.9500 . ?
C4 C5 1.545(10) . ?
C5 C6 1.398(10) . ?
C6 C7 1.400(12) . ?
C6 H6 0.9500 . ?
C7 C8 1.541(11) . ?
C9 C10 1.526(10) . ?
C10 C11 1.433(10) . ?
C11 C12 1.382(9) . ?
C11 H11 0.9500 . ?
C12 C13 1.540(9) . ?
C14 C15 1.523(11) . ?
C15 C16 1.379(9) . ?
C16 C15 1.379(9) 5_666 ?
C16 H16 0.9500 . ?
N1 C17 1.488(11) . ?
N1 C20 1.503(9) . ?
N1 C22 1.506(10) . ?
N1 H1N 0.9300 . ?
C17 C18 1.545(11) . ?
C17 H17A 0.9900 . ?
C17 H17B 0.9900 . ?
C18 C19 1.529(11) . ?
C18 H18A 0.9900 . ?
C18 H18B 0.9900 . ?
C19 C23 1.513(14) . ?
C19 C21 1.513(12) . ?
C19 H19 1.0000 . ?
C20 C21 1.552(10) . ?
C20 H20A 0.9900 . ?
C20 H20B 0.9900 . ?
C21 H21A 0.9900 . ?
C21 H21B 0.9900 . ?
C22 C23 1.544(12) . ?
C22 H22A 0.9900 . ?
C22 H22B 0.9900 . ?
C23 H23A 0.9900 . ?
C23 H23B 0.9900 . ?
loop_
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_1
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_2
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_3
166
_geom_angle
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_1
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_3
_geom_angle_publ_flag
O1 Cu1 O1 91.2(3) . 5_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O7 88.3(2) . 5_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O7 177.4(2) 5_666 5_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O7 177.4(2) . . ?
O1 Cu1 O7 88.3(2) 5_666 . ?
O7 Cu1 O7 92.2(3) 5_666 . ?
O1 Cu2 O4 176.7(2) . . ?
O1 Cu2 O3 89.1(2) . . ?
O4 Cu2 O3 91.6(2) . . ?
O1 Cu2 O6 90.4(2) . . ?
O4 Cu2 O6 88.7(2) . . ?
O3 Cu2 O6 177.5(2) . . ?
O1 Cu2 O5 95.00(19) . . ?
O4 Cu2 O5 88.1(2) . . ?
O3 Cu2 O5 96.09(19) . . ?
O6 Cu2 O5 86.40(19) . . ?
Cu1 O1 Cu2 109.2(2) . . ?
Cu1 O1 H1O 102.5 . . ?
Cu2 O1 H1O 112.5 . . ?
C5 O3 Cu2 125.0(4) . . ?
C7 O4 Cu2 125.0(5) . . ?
C10 O5 Cu2 120.0(5) . . ?
C12 O6 Cu2 124.9(4) . . ?
C15 O7 Cu1 125.0(5) . . ?
F1 C1 F3 108.0(7) . . ?
F1 C1 F2 107.8(6) . . ?
F3 C1 F2 107.6(6) . . ?
F1 C1 C2 111.5(5) . . ?
F3 C1 C2 109.5(6) . . ?
F2 C1 C2 112.2(6) . . ?
O2 C2 C3 129.0(6) . . ?
O2 C2 C1 114.1(6) . . ?
C3 C2 C1 116.8(5) . . ?
C2 C3 C2 123.8(5) 5_666 . ?
C2 C3 H3 118.1 5_666 . ?
C2 C3 H3 118.1 . . ?
F6 C4 F5 108.3(7) . . ?
F6 C4 F4 106.9(8) . . ?
F5 C4 F4 106.8(7) . . ?
F6 C4 C5 110.5(6) . . ?
167
F5 C4 C5 114.6(7) . . ?
F4 C4 C5 109.4(6) . . ?
O3 C5 C6 128.7(7) . . ?
O3 C5 C4 113.9(6) . . ?
C6 C5 C4 117.3(6) . . ?
C5 C6 C7 120.0(7) . . ?
C5 C6 H6 120.0 . . ?
C7 C6 H6 120.0 . . ?
O4 C7 C6 129.6(7) . . ?
O4 C7 C8 113.6(8) . . ?
C6 C7 C8 116.8(7) . . ?
F9 C8 F8 110.9(13) . . ?
F9 C8 F7 105.1(12) . . ?
F8 C8 F7 106.3(10) . . ?
F9 C8 C7 110.6(10) . . ?
F8 C8 C7 111.3(8) . . ?
F7 C8 C7 112.4(10) . . ?
F10 C9 F12 108.2(7) . . ?
F10 C9 F11 109.1(8) . . ?
F12 C9 F11 102.9(7) . . ?
F10 C9 C10 112.7(6) . . ?
F12 C9 C10 114.0(7) . . ?
F11 C9 C10 109.5(7) . . ?
O5 C10 C11 127.5(6) . . ?
O5 C10 C9 117.0(6) . . ?
C11 C10 C9 115.5(6) . . ?
C12 C11 C10 122.7(6) . . ?
C12 C11 H11 118.7 . . ?
C10 C11 H11 118.7 . . ?
O6 C12 C11 130.4(6) . . ?
O6 C12 C13 112.7(6) . . ?
C11 C12 C13 116.9(6) . . ?
F13 C13 F15 108.2(6) . . ?
F13 C13 F14 107.0(6) . . ?
F15 C13 F14 107.2(6) . . ?
F13 C13 C12 113.4(6) . . ?
F15 C13 C12 110.2(6) . . ?
F14 C13 C12 110.6(6) . . ?
F16 C14 F17 107.5(8) . . ?
F16 C14 F18 106.6(11) . . ?
F17 C14 F18 107.7(8) . . ?
F16 C14 C15 111.1(7) . . ?
F17 C14 C15 112.4(9) . . ?
F18 C14 C15 111.4(7) . . ?
168
173
SHELXL-97
bis(diethylammonium)
hexakis(1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoropentane-2,4-dionato)dihydroxotricuprate(II)
;
_chemical_name_common
?
_chemical_melting_point
?
_chemical_formula_moiety '2(C4 H12 N 1+), C30 H8 Cu3 F36 O14 1-'
_chemical_formula_sum
'C38 H32 Cu3 F36 N2 O14'
_chemical_formula_weight
1615.28
loop_
_atom_type_symbol
_atom_type_description
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_real
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_imag
_atom_type_scat_source
'C' 'C' 0.0033 0.0016
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'H' 'H' 0.0000 0.0000
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'Cu' 'Cu' 0.3201 1.2651
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'F' 'F' 0.0171 0.0103
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'N' 'N' 0.0061 0.0033
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'O' 'O' 0.0106 0.0060
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
_symmetry_cell_setting
Monoclinic
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M C2/c
loop_
_symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz
'x, y, z'
'-x, y, -z+1/2'
'x+1/2, y+1/2, z'
'-x+1/2, y+1/2, -z+1/2'
'-x, -y, -z'
'x, -y, z-1/2'
174
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number
16297
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.022
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0806
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min -21
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max 21
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min -25
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max 27
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min -21
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max 21
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.7
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
27.5
_reflns_number_total
6417
_reflns_number_gt
3795
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution ?
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0759P)^2^] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
176
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment mixed
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
6417
_refine_ls_number_parameters
438
_refine_ls_number_restraints
1
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.090
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.046
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.129
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.117
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 0.961
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
0.961
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.007
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.000
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.01704(3) 0.226093(19) 0.60447(3) 0.03130(14) Uani 1 1 d . . .
Cu2 Cu 0.0000 0.32003(3) 0.7500 0.02933(16) Uani 1 2 d S . .
O1 O 0.09848(15) 0.15663(11) 0.61694(14) 0.0363(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O2 O -0.03759(14) 0.19334(11) 0.49863(14) 0.0347(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O3 O -0.06727(14) 0.29385(11) 0.60249(14) 0.0320(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O5 O -0.06891(14) 0.15641(11) 0.68066(14) 0.0326(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O4 O 0.08038(15) 0.29220(13) 0.52467(16) 0.0415(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O7 O 0.06892(14) 0.25648(11) 0.71129(14) 0.0286(5) Uani 1 1 d D . .
O6 O 0.06809(16) 0.38488(12) 0.71009(15) 0.0390(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F -0.13987(13) 0.13368(11) 0.37048(14) 0.0518(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F -0.20051(13) 0.07148(10) 0.65241(15) 0.0497(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F15 F -0.11710(14) -0.00675(10) 0.65531(16) 0.0551(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F8 F -0.17751(16) 0.42505(12) 0.50967(16) 0.0646(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F6 F 0.21671(18) 0.07612(14) 0.65939(16) 0.0821(10) Uani 1 1 d . . .
177
O1 C1 1.252(4) . ?
O2 C3 1.249(4) . ?
O3 C4 1.279(4) . ?
O5 C7 1.254(4) . ?
O4 C6 1.219(4) . ?
O7 H1O 0.828(19) . ?
O6 C9 1.255(5) . ?
F2 C11 1.351(5) . ?
F3 C15 1.320(4) . ?
F15 C15 1.343(4) . ?
F8 C13 1.332(4) . ?
F6 C12 1.282(5) . ?
F14 C11 1.311(4) . ?
F13 C15 1.322(4) . ?
F1 C11 1.333(5) . ?
F5 C12 1.312(5) . ?
F18 C16 1.313(6) . ?
F7 C13 1.336(5) . ?
F9 C13 1.332(4) . ?
F17 C16 1.326(6) . ?
F16 C16 1.343(6) . ?
F4 C12 1.357(5) . ?
F10 C14 1.305(6) . ?
F12 C14 1.328(6) . ?
F11 C14 1.310(6) . ?
N1C C1C 1.484(5) . ?
N1C C3C 1.520(6) . ?
N1C H1C1 0.9200 . ?
N1C H1C2 0.9200 . ?
C8 C7 1.398(4) 2_556 ?
C8 C7 1.398(4) . ?
C8 H8 0.9500 . ?
C7 C15 1.530(5) . ?
C5 C4 1.366(6) . ?
C5 C6 1.417(6) . ?
C5 H5 0.72(4) . ?
C13 C4 1.529(5) . ?
C1 C2 1.378(5) . ?
C1 C12 1.527(5) . ?
C3 C2 1.389(5) . ?
C3 C11 1.557(5) . ?
C9 C10 1.397(5) . ?
C9 C16 1.532(6) . ?
C6 C14 1.557(6) . ?
181
O6 C9 C10 127.3(4) . . ?
O6 C9 C16 113.3(4) . . ?
C10 C9 C16 119.4(4) . . ?
O4 C6 C5 128.4(4) . . ?
O4 C6 C14 115.7(4) . . ?
C5 C6 C14 115.9(4) . . ?
F6 C12 F5 109.5(4) . . ?
F6 C12 F4 107.8(4) . . ?
F5 C12 F4 102.6(3) . . ?
F6 C12 C1 114.0(3) . . ?
F5 C12 C1 112.6(3) . . ?
F4 C12 C1 109.5(3) . . ?
C2C C1C C2C 47.9(12) . . ?
C2C C1C N1C 112.2(4) . . ?
C2C C1C N1C 139.8(12) . . ?
C2C C1C H1C1 109.2 . . ?
C2C C1C H1C1 110.6 . . ?
N1C C1C H1C1 109.2 . . ?
C2C C1C H1C2 109.2 . . ?
C2C C1C H1C2 63.2 . . ?
N1C C1C H1C2 109.2 . . ?
H1C1 C1C H1C2 107.9 . . ?
C1 C2 C3 122.2(3) . . ?
C1 C2 H2 118.9 . . ?
C3 C2 H2 118.9 . . ?
F10 C14 F11 106.6(4) . . ?
F10 C14 F12 107.4(5) . . ?
F11 C14 F12 106.8(5) . . ?
F10 C14 C6 112.1(4) . . ?
F11 C14 C6 112.6(4) . . ?
F12 C14 C6 111.1(4) . . ?
F18 C16 F17 107.6(4) . . ?
F18 C16 F16 107.9(5) . . ?
F17 C16 F16 106.8(4) . . ?
F18 C16 C9 110.9(4) . . ?
F17 C16 C9 113.4(5) . . ?
F16 C16 C9 110.1(4) . . ?
C4C C3C N1C 114.9(4) . . ?
C4C C3C H3C1 108.6 . . ?
N1C C3C H3C1 108.6 . . ?
C4C C3C H3C2 108.6 . . ?
N1C C3C H3C2 108.6 . . ?
H3C1 C3C H3C2 107.5 . . ?
C9 C10 C9 121.4(5) . 2_556 ?
184
O1 C1 C2 C3 -1.6(7) . . . . ?
C12 C1 C2 C3 179.9(4) . . . . ?
O2 C3 C2 C1 -5.5(7) . . . . ?
C11 C3 C2 C1 169.9(4) . . . . ?
O4 C6 C14 F10 108.6(5) . . . . ?
C5 C6 C14 F10 -69.7(6) . . . . ?
O4 C6 C14 F11 -131.2(4) . . . . ?
C5 C6 C14 F11 50.5(6) . . . . ?
O4 C6 C14 F12 -11.6(6) . . . . ?
C5 C6 C14 F12 170.2(4) . . . . ?
O6 C9 C16 F18 62.6(5) . . . . ?
C10 C9 C16 F18 -117.5(4) . . . . ?
O6 C9 C16 F17 -176.3(4) . . . . ?
C10 C9 C16 F17 3.6(6) . . . . ?
O6 C9 C16 F16 -56.7(5) . . . . ?
C10 C9 C16 F16 123.2(4) . . . . ?
C1C N1C C3C C4C -76.2(6) . . . . ?
O6 C9 C10 C9 1.5(3) . . . 2_556 ?
C16 C9 C10 C9 -178.4(4) . . . 2_556 ?
loop_
_geom_hbond_atom_site_label_D
_geom_hbond_atom_site_label_H
_geom_hbond_atom_site_label_A
_geom_hbond_distance_DH
_geom_hbond_distance_HA
_geom_hbond_distance_DA
_geom_hbond_angle_DHA
_geom_hbond_site_symmetry_A
N1C H1C1 F2 0.92 2.48 3.312(4) 150.4 8_556
N1C H1C2 O7 0.92 1.80 2.707(4) 167.0 .
O7 H1O O5 0.828(19) 1.93(2) 2.752(3) 173(4) 2_556
_diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_max 0.995
_diffrn_reflns_theta_full
27.50
_diffrn_measured_fraction_theta_full 0.995
_refine_diff_density_max 0.734
_refine_diff_density_min -0.490
_refine_diff_density_rms 0.081
# END OF CIF
187
SHELXL-97
trans-bis(1,1,1,5,5,5-hexafluoropentane-2,4-dionato)bis(6-diisopropylamino-1,1,1-triflu
oro-4(trifluoromethyl)-(E,E)hexa-3,5-dien-2-one)copper(II)
;
_chemical_name_common
?
_chemical_melting_point
?
_chemical_formula_moiety
'C36 H36 Cu F24 N2 O6'
_chemical_formula_sum
'C36 H36 Cu F24 N2 O6'
_chemical_formula_weight
1112.21
loop_
_atom_type_symbol
_atom_type_description
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_real
_atom_type_scat_dispersion_imag
_atom_type_scat_source
'C' 'C' 0.0033 0.0016
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'H' 'H' 0.0000 0.0000
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'O' 'O' 0.0106 0.0060
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'N' 'N' 0.0061 0.0033
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'Cu' 'Cu' 0.3201 1.2651
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
'F' 'F' 0.0171 0.0103
'International Tables Vol C Tables 4.2.6.8 and 6.1.1.4'
_symmetry_cell_setting
triclinic
_symmetry_space_group_name_H-M P-1
loop_
_symmetry_equiv_pos_as_xyz
'x, y, z'
'-x, -y, -z'
_cell_length_a
10.735(4)
188
_cell_length_b
10.753(4)
_cell_length_c
11.253(3)
_cell_angle_alpha
95.166(18)
_cell_angle_beta
109.532(19)
_cell_angle_gamma
109.655(16)
_cell_volume
1122.5(7)
_cell_formula_units_Z
1
_cell_measurement_temperature 150
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 17509
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
28.7
_exptl_crystal_description
fragment
_exptl_crystal_colour
'green-brown dichroic'
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.42
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.35
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.25
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.645
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
559
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 0.631
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.777
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.858
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
150
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
189
_diffrn_reflns_number
17509
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.022
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0349
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min
-14
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max
12
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min
-13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max
14
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min
-15
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max
15
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.8
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
28.7
_reflns_number_total
5664
_reflns_number_gt
4772
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution 'SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 1990)'
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0688P)^2^+0.2844P] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment constr
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
190
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
5664
_refine_ls_number_parameters
353
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.050
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.043
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.126
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.122
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 1.109
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
1.109
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.002
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.000
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.03012(11) Uani 1 2 d S . .
F1 F 0.80594(17) 0.67994(14) 0.95394(15) 0.0677(4) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2 F 0.7821(2) 0.47841(18) 0.89705(14) 0.0823(6) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3 F 0.65755(19) 0.5230(3) 0.99346(16) 0.0934(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4A F 0.1539(9) 0.5923(13) 0.5847(8) 0.094(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F4B F 0.1434(8) 0.5611(13) 0.5978(10) 0.101(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F5 F 0.3068(3) 0.7630(2) 0.6833(4) 0.1404(12) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F6A F 0.2763(9) 0.6598(8) 0.7984(7) 0.108(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F6B F 0.2299(8) 0.5872(7) 0.7796(8) 0.080(2) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F7A F 0.0189(7) 0.1074(6) 0.3356(11) 0.176(6) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F7B F 0.0610(6) 0.1217(7) 0.2898(5) 0.0817(19) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F8 F 0.10797(18) 0.3179(2) 0.3376(2) 0.0939(7) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F9A F 0.0320(8) 0.2699(11) 0.4655(7) 0.140(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F9B F -0.0113(4) 0.1763(7) 0.4264(5) 0.0783(16) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
F10 F 0.21068(15) 0.13480(16) 0.82779(13) 0.0557(3) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F11 F 0.43826(15) 0.21608(15) 0.93316(12) 0.0546(3) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F12 F 0.32802(17) 0.00875(13) 0.82761(13) 0.0553(3) Uani 1 1 d . . .
191
_atom_site_aniso_U_22
_atom_site_aniso_U_33
_atom_site_aniso_U_23
_atom_site_aniso_U_13
_atom_site_aniso_U_12
Cu1 0.03177(17) 0.04016(18) 0.02510(16) 0.00962(12) 0.01228(12) 0.02018(14)
F1 0.0579(9) 0.0475(7) 0.0576(8) 0.0018(6) -0.0140(7) 0.0118(7)
F2 0.1021(13) 0.0886(11) 0.0476(8) -0.0085(8) -0.0142(8) 0.0761(11)
F3 0.0635(10) 0.170(2) 0.0514(9) 0.0657(12) 0.0221(8) 0.0416(12)
F4A 0.086(6) 0.196(9) 0.039(2) 0.015(4) 0.017(3) 0.112(6)
F4B 0.030(3) 0.143(6) 0.105(7) -0.025(5) 0.023(3) 0.023(3)
F5 0.124(2) 0.0808(14) 0.260(4) 0.0315(18) 0.092(2) 0.0756(15)
F6A 0.142(7) 0.216(9) 0.0378(18) 0.025(4) 0.040(3) 0.149(7)
F6B 0.085(4) 0.142(5) 0.077(4) 0.061(4) 0.064(4) 0.079(4)
F7A 0.059(4) 0.048(2) 0.270(12) 0.011(5) -0.084(6) -0.005(3)
F7B 0.056(3) 0.111(5) 0.0500(18) -0.021(2) -0.0147(18) 0.044(3)
F8 0.0532(10) 0.0929(13) 0.1088(15) 0.0582(12) -0.0020(9) 0.0212(9)
F9A 0.115(6) 0.283(10) 0.108(5) 0.077(6) 0.055(4) 0.161(7)
F9B 0.0284(16) 0.139(5) 0.074(3) 0.047(3) 0.0225(18) 0.032(3)
F10 0.0504(8) 0.0732(9) 0.0522(8) 0.0135(7) 0.0331(7) 0.0216(7)
F11 0.0550(8) 0.0650(8) 0.0331(6) -0.0023(6) 0.0180(6) 0.0133(7)
F12 0.0759(9) 0.0458(7) 0.0567(8) 0.0229(6) 0.0402(7) 0.0214(7)
O1 0.0343(7) 0.0391(6) 0.0283(6) 0.0100(5) 0.0111(5) 0.0193(6)
O2 0.0338(7) 0.0431(7) 0.0286(6) 0.0081(5) 0.0132(5) 0.0208(6)
O3 0.0326(7) 0.0373(7) 0.0407(7) 0.0132(5) 0.0146(6) 0.0153(5)
N1 0.0355(8) 0.0351(7) 0.0311(7) 0.0137(6) 0.0137(6) 0.0164(6)
C1 0.0429(10) 0.0370(9) 0.0301(9) 0.0064(7) 0.0084(8) 0.0174(8)
C2 0.0336(9) 0.0259(7) 0.0275(8) 0.0075(6) 0.0085(7) 0.0102(7)
C3 0.0455(11) 0.0456(10) 0.0273(8) 0.0072(7) 0.0141(8) 0.0241(9)
C4 0.0357(9) 0.0332(8) 0.0317(8) 0.0059(7) 0.0146(7) 0.0162(7)
C5 0.0561(14) 0.0703(15) 0.0397(11) 0.0098(10) 0.0208(10) 0.0410(12)
C6 0.0325(11) 0.0554(13) 0.0671(15) 0.0244(11) 0.0132(10) 0.0186(10)
C7 0.0306(9) 0.0328(9) 0.0437(10) 0.0068(7) 0.0115(8) 0.0136(7)
C8 0.0314(9) 0.0359(9) 0.0423(10) 0.0045(8) 0.0173(8) 0.0114(7)
C9 0.0361(9) 0.0278(8) 0.0325(8) 0.0029(7) 0.0158(7) 0.0085(7)
C10 0.0430(11) 0.0419(10) 0.0366(10) 0.0051(8) 0.0202(9) 0.0119(8)
C11 0.0331(9) 0.0307(8) 0.0313(8) 0.0079(7) 0.0129(7) 0.0117(7)
C12 0.0380(9) 0.0307(8) 0.0292(8) 0.0076(7) 0.0141(7) 0.0124(7)
C13 0.0381(10) 0.0426(10) 0.0343(9) 0.0180(8) 0.0166(8) 0.0179(8)
C14 0.0511(14) 0.0603(14) 0.0633(15) 0.0143(12) 0.0321(12) 0.0082(11)
C15 0.145(3) 0.0570(16) 0.0646(18) -0.0004(13) 0.071(2) 0.0058(18)
C16 0.0454(11) 0.0565(12) 0.0410(10) 0.0258(9) 0.0185(9) 0.0298(10)
C17 0.0520(14) 0.0772(17) 0.0364(11) 0.0201(11) 0.0075(10) 0.0245(12)
C18 0.0854(19) 0.0567(14) 0.0646(15) 0.0369(12) 0.0376(14) 0.0433(14)
193
_geom_special_details
;
All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
;
loop_
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_1
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_2
_geom_bond_distance
_geom_bond_site_symmetry_2
_geom_bond_publ_flag
Cu1 O2 1.9374(12) . ?
Cu1 O2 1.9374(12) 2_666 ?
Cu1 O1 1.9581(12) . ?
Cu1 O1 1.9581(12) 2_666 ?
Cu1 O3 2.4097(13) . ?
Cu1 O3 2.4097(13) 2_666 ?
F1 C1 1.315(2) . ?
F2 C1 1.305(2) . ?
F3 C1 1.314(3) . ?
F4A C5 1.264(8) . ?
F4B C5 1.289(9) . ?
F5 C5 1.305(3) . ?
F6A F6B 0.736(11) . ?
F6A C5 1.261(7) . ?
F6B C5 1.360(7) . ?
F7A F7B 0.785(14) . ?
F7A C6 1.204(7) . ?
F7A F9B 1.394(12) . ?
F7B C6 1.383(6) . ?
F8 C6 1.285(3) . ?
F9A F9B 0.944(9) . ?
F9A C6 1.388(7) . ?
F9B C6 1.278(5) . ?
F10 C10 1.331(2) . ?
F11 C10 1.345(2) . ?
F12 C10 1.335(2) . ?
O1 C2 1.248(2) . ?
O2 C4 1.258(2) . ?
194
O3 C7 1.244(2) . ?
N1 C12 1.320(2) . ?
N1 C13 1.485(2) . ?
N1 C16 1.492(2) . ?
C1 C2 1.540(2) . ?
C2 C3 1.392(3) . ?
C3 C4 1.381(3) . ?
C3 H3 0.9500 . ?
C4 C5 1.532(3) . ?
C6 C7 1.543(3) . ?
C7 C8 1.403(3) . ?
C8 C9 1.392(3) . ?
C8 H8 0.9500 . ?
C9 C11 1.397(3) . ?
C9 C10 1.520(3) . ?
C11 C12 1.392(3) . ?
C11 H11 0.9500 . ?
C12 H12 0.9500 . ?
C13 C15 1.505(3) . ?
C13 C14 1.512(3) . ?
C13 H13 1.0000 . ?
C14 H14A 0.9800 . ?
C14 H14B 0.9800 . ?
C14 H14C 0.9800 . ?
C15 H15A 0.9800 . ?
C15 H15B 0.9800 . ?
C15 H15C 0.9800 . ?
C16 C17 1.523(3) . ?
C16 C18 1.527(3) . ?
C16 H16 1.0000 . ?
C17 H17A 0.9800 . ?
C17 H17B 0.9800 . ?
C17 H17C 0.9800 . ?
C18 H18A 0.9800 . ?
C18 H18B 0.9800 . ?
C18 H18C 0.9800 . ?
loop_
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_1
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_2
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_3
_geom_angle
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_1
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_3
195
_geom_angle_publ_flag
O2 Cu1 O2 180.00(3) . 2_666 ?
O2 Cu1 O1 92.88(5) . . ?
O2 Cu1 O1 87.12(5) 2_666 . ?
O2 Cu1 O1 87.11(5) . 2_666 ?
O2 Cu1 O1 92.89(5) 2_666 2_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O1 180.0 . 2_666 ?
O2 Cu1 O3 91.32(5) . . ?
O2 Cu1 O3 88.68(5) 2_666 . ?
O1 Cu1 O3 93.12(5) . . ?
O1 Cu1 O3 86.88(5) 2_666 . ?
O2 Cu1 O3 88.69(5) . 2_666 ?
O2 Cu1 O3 91.32(5) 2_666 2_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O3 86.88(5) . 2_666 ?
O1 Cu1 O3 93.12(5) 2_666 2_666 ?
O3 Cu1 O3 180.00(4) . 2_666 ?
F6B F6A C5 81.2(10) . . ?
F6A F6B C5 66.4(9) . . ?
F7B F7A C6 85.3(9) . . ?
F7B F7A F9B 140.5(11) . . ?
C6 F7A F9B 58.4(5) . . ?
F7A F7B C6 60.2(7) . . ?
F9B F9A C6 63.2(5) . . ?
F9A F9B C6 75.6(6) . . ?
F9A F9B F7A 127.7(8) . . ?
C6 F9B F7A 53.3(3) . . ?
C2 O1 Cu1 124.01(12) . . ?
C4 O2 Cu1 124.37(12) . . ?
C7 O3 Cu1 122.03(12) . . ?
C12 N1 C13 122.90(15) . . ?
C12 N1 C16 118.43(15) . . ?
C13 N1 C16 118.53(15) . . ?
F2 C1 F3 108.23(19) . . ?
F2 C1 F1 107.05(19) . . ?
F3 C1 F1 105.57(19) . . ?
F2 C1 C2 112.85(16) . . ?
F3 C1 C2 112.49(17) . . ?
F1 C1 C2 110.25(15) . . ?
O1 C2 C3 128.61(16) . . ?
O1 C2 C1 115.13(16) . . ?
C3 C2 C1 116.22(16) . . ?
C4 C3 C2 121.26(17) . . ?
C4 C3 H3 119.4 . . ?
C2 C3 H3 119.4 . . ?
196
O2 C4 C3 128.72(17) . . ?
O2 C4 C5 113.63(16) . . ?
C3 C4 C5 117.64(17) . . ?
F6A C5 F4A 123.9(6) . . ?
F6A C5 F4B 115.5(7) . . ?
F4A C5 F4B 16.9(10) . . ?
F6A C5 F5 90.3(4) . . ?
F4A C5 F5 96.6(6) . . ?
F4B C5 F5 112.5(6) . . ?
F6A C5 F6B 32.3(5) . . ?
F4A C5 F6B 105.0(6) . . ?
F4B C5 F6B 91.1(6) . . ?
F5 C5 F6B 120.4(3) . . ?
F6A C5 C4 115.5(4) . . ?
F4A C5 C4 114.2(5) . . ?
F4B C5 C4 111.8(5) . . ?
F5 C5 C4 109.4(2) . . ?
F6B C5 C4 110.6(4) . . ?
F7A C6 F9B 68.3(6) . . ?
F7A C6 F8 118.1(5) . . ?
F9B C6 F8 117.0(3) . . ?
F7A C6 F7B 34.5(7) . . ?
F9B C6 F7B 101.5(4) . . ?
F8 C6 F7B 95.3(4) . . ?
F7A C6 F9A 108.7(7) . . ?
F9B C6 F9A 41.2(4) . . ?
F8 C6 F9A 91.0(4) . . ?
F7B C6 F9A 138.7(5) . . ?
F7A C6 C7 113.9(4) . . ?
F9B C6 C7 117.4(3) . . ?
F8 C6 C7 114.48(19) . . ?
F7B C6 C7 106.9(3) . . ?
F9A C6 C7 107.4(3) . . ?
O3 C7 C8 128.49(18) . . ?
O3 C7 C6 114.65(18) . . ?
C8 C7 C6 116.79(18) . . ?
C9 C8 C7 124.51(17) . . ?
C9 C8 H8 117.7 . . ?
C7 C8 H8 117.7 . . ?
C8 C9 C11 125.84(17) . . ?
C8 C9 C10 115.41(17) . . ?
C11 C9 C10 118.74(17) . . ?
F10 C10 F12 106.70(17) . . ?
F10 C10 F11 106.21(16) . . ?
197
Cu1 O2 C4 C5 178.93(14) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 O2 0.2(3) . . . . ?
C2 C3 C4 C5 -178.44(19) . . . . ?
F6B F6A C5 F4A 61.4(14) . . . . ?
F6B F6A C5 F4B 44.3(14) . . . . ?
F6B F6A C5 F5 159.5(11) . . . . ?
F6B F6A C5 C4 -88.7(12) . . . . ?
F6A F6B C5 F4A -131.0(12) . . . . ?
F6A F6B C5 F4B -140.9(13) . . . . ?
F6A F6B C5 F5 -23.9(13) . . . . ?
F6A F6B C5 C4 105.3(11) . . . . ?
O2 C4 C5 F6A 178.4(5) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F6A -2.7(5) . . . . ?
O2 C4 C5 F4A 25.4(7) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F4A -155.7(6) . . . . ?
O2 C4 C5 F4B 43.7(6) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F4B -137.5(6) . . . . ?
O2 C4 C5 F5 -81.5(3) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F5 97.3(3) . . . . ?
O2 C4 C5 F6B 143.6(4) . . . . ?
C3 C4 C5 F6B -37.5(4) . . . . ?
F7B F7A C6 F9B 163.5(11) . . . . ?
F7B F7A C6 F8 53.6(10) . . . . ?
F9B F7A C6 F8 -109.9(5) . . . . ?
F9B F7A C6 F7B -163.5(11) . . . . ?
F7B F7A C6 F9A 155.2(9) . . . . ?
F9B F7A C6 F9A -8.3(6) . . . . ?
F7B F7A C6 C7 -85.1(10) . . . . ?
F9B F7A C6 C7 111.4(4) . . . . ?
F9A F9B C6 F7A -168.1(8) . . . . ?
F9A F9B C6 F8 -56.6(7) . . . . ?
F7A F9B C6 F8 111.5(6) . . . . ?
F9A F9B C6 F7B -158.6(6) . . . . ?
F7A F9B C6 F7B 9.4(7) . . . . ?
F7A F9B C6 F9A 168.1(8) . . . . ?
F9A F9B C6 C7 85.4(7) . . . . ?
F7A F9B C6 C7 -106.6(5) . . . . ?
F7A F7B C6 F9B -15.6(10) . . . . ?
F7A F7B C6 F8 -134.5(9) . . . . ?
F7A F7B C6 F9A -37.0(13) . . . . ?
F7A F7B C6 C7 107.9(9) . . . . ?
F9B F9A C6 F7A 11.7(8) . . . . ?
F9B F9A C6 F8 131.9(6) . . . . ?
F9B F9A C6 F7B 32.8(10) . . . . ?
200
24.046(8)
10.014(3)
23.767(8)
202
_cell_angle_alpha
90
_cell_angle_beta
118.793(15)
_cell_angle_gamma
90
_cell_volume
5015(3)
_cell_formula_units_Z
4
_cell_measurement_temperature 100
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 42761
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
32.0
_exptl_crystal_description
needle
_exptl_crystal_colour
'blue-green'
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.27
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.10
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.05
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.831
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
2736
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 1.823
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.639
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.914
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
100
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number
42761
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.032
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.2409
203
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min -31
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max 32
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min -12
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max 14
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min -35
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max 35
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.5
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
32.0
_reflns_number_total
13365
_reflns_number_gt
4711
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution ?
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0719P)^2^] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment constr
_refine_ls_extinction_method
none
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
?
_refine_ls_number_reflns
13365
_refine_ls_number_parameters
705
204
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.175
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.060
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.163
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.147
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 0.880
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
0.880
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.012
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.002
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1A Cu 0.43728(3) 0.54465(7) 0.19075(3) 0.0402(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
Cu2A Cu 0.53039(3) 0.78971(7) 0.20855(3) 0.0437(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F1A F 0.3694(2) 0.2973(5) 0.0044(2) 0.0969(15) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F2A F 0.3877(2) 0.4933(5) -0.0209(2) 0.0906(15) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F3A F 0.2928(2) 0.4262(5) -0.05127(18) 0.0903(14) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F4A F 0.23755(17) 0.5406(4) 0.1681(2) 0.0852(13) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F5A F 0.18997(18) 0.5253(5) 0.0669(2) 0.0926(15) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F6A F 0.23172(19) 0.7104(5) 0.1132(2) 0.0987(16) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F7A F 0.51592(19) 0.8626(4) -0.01675(19) 0.0848(13) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F8A F 0.4320(2) 0.8528(5) -0.00689(19) 0.0984(16) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F9A F 0.4828(3) 0.6745(5) -0.0044(2) 0.1128(18) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F10A F 0.7189(2) 0.8878(5) 0.1648(2) 0.1061(17) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F11A F 0.7200(2) 0.9598(7) 0.2475(3) 0.140(2) Uani 1 1 d . . .
F12A F 0.7347(2) 0.7615(8) 0.2409(3) 0.158(3) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O1A O 0.52721(16) 0.5567(3) 0.21614(16) 0.0354(9) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O2A O 0.44641(16) 0.7819(3) 0.20114(17) 0.0376(9) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O3A O 0.5598(2) 0.3063(5) 0.2532(3) 0.0846(16) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O4A O 0.4360(2) 1.0453(5) 0.2237(3) 0.0986(18) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O5A O 0.41276(18) 0.4940(4) 0.10390(18) 0.0497(11) Uani 1 1 d . . .
O6A O 0.34918(17) 0.5612(3) 0.17234(18) 0.0406(10) Uani 1 1 d . . .
205
209
loop_
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_1
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_2
_geom_bond_distance
_geom_bond_site_symmetry_2
_geom_bond_publ_flag
Cu1A O5A 1.921(4) . ?
Cu1A O1A 1.949(3) . ?
Cu1A O6A 1.953(4) . ?
Cu1A O1A 1.955(4) 2_655 ?
Cu1A O2A 2.388(4) . ?
Cu1A Cu1A 2.9744(17) 2_655 ?
Cu2A O8A 1.935(4) . ?
Cu2A O2A 1.942(4) 2_655 ?
Cu2A O2A 1.942(4) . ?
Cu2A O7A 1.950(4) . ?
Cu2A O1A 2.344(3) . ?
Cu2A Cu2A 2.9649(17) 2_655 ?
F1A C7A 1.344(8) . ?
F2A C7A 1.302(9) . ?
F3A C7A 1.333(7) . ?
F4A C11A 1.332(7) . ?
F5A C11A 1.288(7) . ?
F6A C11A 1.340(8) . ?
F7A C12A 1.348(8) . ?
F8A C12A 1.317(9) . ?
F9A C12A 1.345(9) . ?
F10A C16A 1.301(8) . ?
F11A C16A 1.328(9) . ?
F12A C16A 1.253(9) . ?
O1A C1A 1.447(6) . ?
O1A Cu1A 1.955(4) 2_655 ?
O2A C4A 1.431(6) . ?
O2A Cu2A 1.942(4) 2_655 ?
O3A C2A 1.352(7) . ?
O4A C5A 1.427(8) . ?
O5A C8A 1.270(7) . ?
O6A C10A 1.262(6) . ?
O7A C13A 1.255(7) . ?
O8A C15A 1.289(7) . ?
C1A C2A 1.511(8) . ?
C1A H1A1 0.9900 . ?
C1A H1A2 0.9900 . ?
C2A C3A 1.512(8) . ?
210
224
8.852(2)
13.177(3)
17.356(3)
90
225
'
_cell_angle_beta
90.541(10)
_cell_angle_gamma
90
_cell_volume
2024.5(7)
_cell_formula_units_Z
2
_cell_measurement_temperature 120
_cell_measurement_reflns_used 5833
_cell_measurement_theta_min
2.5
_cell_measurement_theta_max
32.0
_exptl_crystal_description
needle
_exptl_crystal_colour
colorless
_exptl_crystal_size_max
0.48
_exptl_crystal_size_mid
0.20
_exptl_crystal_size_min
0.18
_exptl_crystal_density_meas
?
_exptl_crystal_density_diffrn 1.364
_exptl_crystal_density_method 'not measured'
_exptl_crystal_F_000
880
_exptl_absorpt_coefficient_mu 2.213
_exptl_absorpt_correction_type 'multi-scan'
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_min 0.416
_exptl_absorpt_correction_T_max 0.691
_exptl_absorpt_process_details 'HKL Scalepack (Otwinowski & Minor 1997)'
_exptl_special_details
;
?
;
_diffrn_ambient_temperature
120
_diffrn_radiation_wavelength
0.71073
_diffrn_radiation_type
MoK\a
_diffrn_radiation_source
'fine-focus sealed tube'
_diffrn_radiation_monochromator graphite
_diffrn_measurement_device 'KappaCCD (with Oxford Cryostream)'
_diffrn_measurement_method
' \w scans with \k offsets'
_diffrn_detector_area_resol_mean ?
_diffrn_standards_number
0
_diffrn_standards_interval_count ?
_diffrn_standards_interval_time ?
_diffrn_standards_decay_%
<2
_diffrn_reflns_number
25016
_diffrn_reflns_av_R_equivalents 0.042
_diffrn_reflns_av_sigmaI/netI 0.0468
226
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_min -13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_h_max 13
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_min -19
_diffrn_reflns_limit_k_max 15
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_min -25
_diffrn_reflns_limit_l_max 25
_diffrn_reflns_theta_min
2.8
_diffrn_reflns_theta_max
32.0
_reflns_number_total
7008
_reflns_number_gt
4403
_reflns_threshold_expression
I>2\s(I)
_computing_data_collection
?
_computing_cell_refinement
?
_computing_data_reduction
?
_computing_structure_solution ?
_computing_structure_refinement 'SHELXL-97 (Sheldrick, 1997)'
_computing_molecular_graphics ?
_computing_publication_material ?
_refine_special_details
;
Refinement of F^2^ against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and
goodness of fit S are based on F^2^, conventional R-factors R are based
on F, with F set to zero for negative F^2^. The threshold expression of
F^2^ > 2sigma(F^2^) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is
not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based
on F^2^ are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and Rfactors based on ALL data will be even larger.
;
_refine_ls_structure_factor_coef Fsqd
_refine_ls_matrix_type
full
_refine_ls_weighting_scheme
calc
_refine_ls_weighting_details
'calc w=1/[\s^2^(Fo^2^)+(0.0994P)^2^+2.9908P] where P=(Fo^2^+2Fc^2^)/3'
_atom_sites_solution_primary
direct
_atom_sites_solution_secondary difmap
_atom_sites_solution_hydrogens geom
_refine_ls_hydrogen_treatment noref
_refine_ls_extinction_method
SHELXL
_refine_ls_extinction_coef
0.0130(15)
_refine_ls_extinction_expression
'Fc^*^=kFc[1+0.001xFc^2^\l^3^/sin(2\q)]^-1/4^'
227
_refine_ls_number_reflns
7008
_refine_ls_number_parameters
183
_refine_ls_number_restraints
0
_refine_ls_R_factor_all
0.095
_refine_ls_R_factor_gt
0.056
_refine_ls_wR_factor_ref
0.195
_refine_ls_wR_factor_gt
0.167
_refine_ls_goodness_of_fit_ref 0.996
_refine_ls_restrained_S_all
0.996
_refine_ls_shift/su_max
0.001
_refine_ls_shift/su_mean
0.000
loop_
_atom_site_label
_atom_site_type_symbol
_atom_site_fract_x
_atom_site_fract_y
_atom_site_fract_z
_atom_site_U_iso_or_equiv
_atom_site_adp_type
_atom_site_occupancy
_atom_site_symmetry_multiplicity
_atom_site_calc_flag
_atom_site_refinement_flags
_atom_site_disorder_assembly
_atom_site_disorder_group
Cu1 Cu 0.30317(4) 0.35107(3) 0.17670(2) 0.02676(14) Uani 1 1 d . . .
Cu2 Cu 0.30321(5) 0.14569(3) 0.17682(2) 0.02952(15) Uani 1 1 d . . .
Si1C Si 0.5339(2) 0.25549(14) 0.08463(12) 0.0247(6) Uani 0.204(6) 1 d P . .
C1SI C 0.5339(2) 0.25549(14) 0.08463(12) 0.0247(6) Uani 0.796(6) 1 d P . .
Si2C Si 0.23930(12) 0.23771(8) 0.02400(6) 0.0277(3) Uani 0.796(6) 1 d P . .
C2SI C 0.23930(12) 0.23771(8) 0.02400(6) 0.0277(3) Uani 0.204(6) 1 d P . .
Si3C Si 0.10772(16) 0.52125(10) 0.21334(8) 0.0306(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
C3SI C 0.10772(16) 0.52125(10) 0.21334(8) 0.0306(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
Si4C Si 0.09897(14) -0.02563(9) 0.22231(7) 0.0238(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
C4SI C 0.09897(14) -0.02563(9) 0.22231(7) 0.0238(3) Uani 0.50 1 d P . .
N1 N 0.3591(3) 0.24891(17) 0.10158(15) 0.0244(5) Uani 1 1 d . . .
N2 N 0.2500 0.4561(3) 0.2500 0.0287(8) Uani 1 2 d S . .
N3 N 0.2500 0.0397(3) 0.2500 0.0248(7) Uani 1 2 d S . .
C1 C 0.6224(4) 0.2256(3) 0.1632(2) 0.0399(8) Uani 1 1 d . . .
H1A H 0.7277 0.2454 0.1590 0.060 Uiso 1 1 d . . .
H1B H 0.6160 0.1512 0.1704 0.060 Uiso 1 1 d . . .
H1C H 0.5749 0.2595 0.2064 0.060 Uiso 1 1 d . . .
C2 C 0.5852(5) 0.1761(4) 0.0231(3) 0.0517(10) Uani 1 1 d . . .
228
229
loop_
_atom_site_aniso_label
_atom_site_aniso_U_11
_atom_site_aniso_U_22
_atom_site_aniso_U_33
_atom_site_aniso_U_23
_atom_site_aniso_U_13
_atom_site_aniso_U_12
Cu1 0.0316(2) 0.0224(2) 0.0264(2) -0.00085(13) 0.00744(15) 0.00223(13)
Cu2 0.0357(2) 0.0263(2) 0.0266(2) 0.00157(14) 0.00208(16) 0.00211(14)
Si1C 0.0215(9) 0.0297(11) 0.0231(10) -0.0034(7) 0.0037(7) 0.0024(7)
C1SI 0.0215(9) 0.0297(11) 0.0231(10) -0.0034(7) 0.0037(7) 0.0024(7)
Si2C 0.0289(5) 0.0349(6) 0.0192(5) 0.0016(4) -0.0004(3) 0.0022(4)
C2SI 0.0289(5) 0.0349(6) 0.0192(5) 0.0016(4) -0.0004(3) 0.0022(4)
Si3C 0.0325(7) 0.0237(6) 0.0359(7) 0.0054(5) 0.0110(5) 0.0082(5)
C3SI 0.0325(7) 0.0237(6) 0.0359(7) 0.0054(5) 0.0110(5) 0.0082(5)
Si4C 0.0266(6) 0.0201(6) 0.0247(6) 0.0013(5) -0.0003(5) -0.0016(4)
C4SI 0.0266(6) 0.0201(6) 0.0247(6) 0.0013(5) -0.0003(5) -0.0016(4)
N1 0.0294(12) 0.0244(12) 0.0196(11) 0.0008(9) 0.0063(9) 0.0028(9)
N2 0.040(2) 0.0158(15) 0.0307(18) 0.000 0.0133(15) 0.000
N3 0.0374(19) 0.0172(15) 0.0198(15) 0.000 -0.0009(13) 0.000
C1 0.0340(17) 0.0404(18) 0.045(2) 0.0042(16) 0.0058(15) 0.0077(14)
C2 0.045(2) 0.058(3) 0.052(2) -0.005(2) 0.0008(18) 0.0011(19)
C3 0.0362(19) 0.063(3) 0.040(2) -0.0041(18) 0.0005(15) 0.0030(17)
C4 0.048(2) 0.0393(18) 0.0384(19) 0.0018(15) -0.0036(16) 0.0051(16)
C5 0.046(2) 0.067(3) 0.041(2) 0.001(2) 0.0000(17) 0.001(2)
C6 0.049(2) 0.065(3) 0.059(3) 0.007(2) 0.005(2) 0.001(2)
C7 0.080(4) 0.065(3) 0.062(3) 0.012(3) 0.018(3) -0.011(3)
C8 0.042(2) 0.054(2) 0.044(2) 0.0142(18) 0.0103(16) 0.0120(17)
C9 0.054(3) 0.055(3) 0.088(4) -0.010(3) 0.003(2) 0.017(2)
C10 0.056(2) 0.0335(18) 0.0408(19) -0.0048(15) 0.0064(16) -0.0067(16)
C11 0.045(2) 0.058(2) 0.044(2) -0.0111(19) -0.0044(16) 0.0131(18)
C12 0.039(2) 0.067(3) 0.085(3) 0.045(3) 0.005(2) 0.007(2)
_geom_special_details
;
All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken
into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
;
230
loop_
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_1
_geom_bond_atom_site_label_2
_geom_bond_distance
_geom_bond_site_symmetry_2
_geom_bond_publ_flag
Cu1 N2 1.941(2) . ?
Cu1 N1 1.942(2) . ?
Cu1 Cu2 2.7064(8) . ?
Cu1 Cu1 2.7213(8) 2 ?
Cu1 Si1C 2.8936(19) . ?
Cu1 Si3C 2.9065(14) . ?
Cu2 N3 1.949(2) . ?
Cu2 N1 1.953(2) . ?
Cu2 Cu2 2.7176(9) 2 ?
Si1C C3 1.544(5) . ?
Si1C C2 1.565(5) . ?
Si1C N1 1.580(3) . ?
Si1C C1 1.615(5) . ?
Si1C Si2C 2.813(2) . ?
Si2C N1 1.712(3) . ?
Si2C C6 1.811(5) . ?
Si2C C4 1.811(4) . ?
Si2C C5 1.814(5) . ?
Si3C N2 1.647(2) . ?
Si3C C9 1.670(6) . ?
Si3C C7 1.679(6) . ?
Si3C C8 1.712(5) . ?
Si3C Si3C 2.811(3) 2 ?
Si4C C12 1.624(4) . ?
Si4C N3 1.657(2) . ?
Si4C C10 1.700(4) . ?
Si4C C11 1.718(5) . ?
Si4C Si4C 2.833(3) 2 ?
N2 C3SI 1.647(2) 2 ?
N2 Si3C 1.647(2) 2 ?
N2 Cu1 1.941(2) 2 ?
N3 C4SI 1.657(2) 2 ?
N3 Si4C 1.657(2) 2 ?
N3 Cu2 1.949(2) 2 ?
C1 H1A 0.97 . ?
C1 H1B 0.99 . ?
C1 H1C 0.97 . ?
C2 H2A 0.98 . ?
231
C2 H2B 0.99 . ?
C2 H2C 0.98 . ?
C3 H3A 0.99 . ?
C3 H3B 0.99 . ?
C3 H3C 0.97 . ?
C4 H4A 0.98 . ?
C4 H4B 0.98 . ?
C4 H4C 0.98 . ?
C5 H5A 0.98 . ?
C5 H5B 0.98 . ?
C5 H5C 0.97 . ?
C6 H6A 0.98 . ?
C6 H6B 0.98 . ?
C6 H6C 0.97 . ?
C7 H7A 0.98 . ?
C7 H7B 0.98 . ?
C7 H7C 0.99 . ?
C8 H8A 0.97 . ?
C8 H8B 0.99 . ?
C8 H8C 0.99 . ?
C9 H9A 0.97 . ?
C9 H9B 0.97 . ?
C9 H9C 0.98 . ?
C10 H10A 0.98 . ?
C10 H10B 0.97 . ?
C10 H10C 0.98 . ?
C11 H11A 0.98 . ?
C11 H11B 0.97 . ?
C11 H11C 0.98 . ?
C12 H12A 0.97 . ?
C12 H12B 0.97 . ?
C12 H12C 0.99 . ?
loop_
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_1
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_2
_geom_angle_atom_site_label_3
_geom_angle
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_1
_geom_angle_site_symmetry_3
_geom_angle_publ_flag
N2 Cu1 N1 178.38(10) . . ?
N2 Cu1 Cu2 135.44(7) . . ?
N1 Cu1 Cu2 46.14(7) . . ?
232
N2 Si3C C7 114.1(2) . . ?
C9 Si3C C7 109.5(2) . . ?
N2 Si3C C8 107.80(18) . . ?
C9 Si3C C8 107.9(2) . . ?
C7 Si3C C8 104.5(2) . . ?
N2 Si3C Si3C 31.42(11) . 2 ?
C9 Si3C Si3C 104.50(19) . 2 ?
C7 Si3C Si3C 90.6(2) . 2 ?
C8 Si3C Si3C 136.77(14) . 2 ?
N2 Si3C Cu1 39.44(8) . . ?
C9 Si3C Cu1 86.43(16) . . ?
C7 Si3C Cu1 153.5(2) . . ?
C8 Si3C Cu1 89.80(14) . . ?
Si3C Si3C Cu1 64.30(4) 2 . ?
C12 Si4C N3 114.80(18) . . ?
C12 Si4C C10 107.5(2) . . ?
N3 Si4C C10 107.72(17) . . ?
C12 Si4C C11 109.4(2) . . ?
N3 Si4C C11 110.69(16) . . ?
C10 Si4C C11 106.3(2) . . ?
C12 Si4C Si4C 91.66(17) . 2 ?
N3 Si4C Si4C 31.27(11) . 2 ?
C10 Si4C Si4C 137.61(14) . 2 ?
C11 Si4C Si4C 102.00(15) . 2 ?
Si1C N1 Si2C 117.30(17) . . ?
Si1C N1 Cu1 110.08(16) . . ?
Si2C N1 Cu1 115.33(14) . . ?
Si1C N1 Cu2 114.68(16) . . ?
Si2C N1 Cu2 107.87(14) . . ?
Cu1 N1 Cu2 88.05(11) . . ?
C3SI N2 Si3C 0.00(12) 2 2 ?
C3SI N2 Si3C 117.2(2) 2 . ?
Si3C N2 Si3C 117.2(2) 2 . ?
C3SI N2 Cu1 115.82(6) 2 . ?
Si3C N2 Cu1 115.82(6) 2 . ?
Si3C N2 Cu1 107.93(6) . . ?
C3SI N2 Cu1 107.93(6) 2 2 ?
Si3C N2 Cu1 107.93(6) 2 2 ?
Si3C N2 Cu1 115.82(6) . 2 ?
Cu1 N2 Cu1 89.03(14) . 2 ?
Si4C N3 C4SI 117.5(2) . 2 ?
Si4C N3 Si4C 117.5(2) . 2 ?
C4SI N3 Si4C 0.00(11) 2 2 ?
Si4C N3 Cu2 112.48(6) . . ?
234
_geom_torsion_site_symmetry_4
_geom_torsion_publ_flag
N2 Cu1 Cu2 N3 0.09(5) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 Cu2 N3 179.60(12) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Cu2 N3 0.07(3) 2 . . . ?
Si1C Cu1 Cu2 N3 148.69(5) . . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Cu2 N3 -48.99(6) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Cu2 N1 -179.51(12) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Cu2 N1 -179.53(12) 2 . . . ?
Si1C Cu1 Cu2 N1 -30.90(13) . . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Cu2 N1 131.42(13) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Cu2 Cu2 0.06(3) . . . 2 ?
N1 Cu1 Cu2 Cu2 179.57(12) . . . 2 ?
Cu1 Cu1 Cu2 Cu2 0.04(2) 2 . . 2 ?
Si1C Cu1 Cu2 Cu2 148.67(5) . . . 2 ?
Si3C Cu1 Cu2 Cu2 -49.01(6) . . . 2 ?
N2 Cu1 Si1C C3 -45.5(2) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 Si1C C3 132.1(2) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 Si1C C3 178.32(18) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Si1C C3 -127.23(16) 2 . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Si1C C3 22.5(2) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Si1C C2 -175.4(4) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 Si1C C2 2.1(4) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 Si1C C2 48.4(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Si1C C2 102.8(4) 2 . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Si1C C2 -107.5(4) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Si1C N1 -177.57(19) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 Si1C N1 46.22(15) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Si1C N1 100.68(16) 2 . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Si1C N1 -109.63(18) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Si1C C1 62.6(2) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 Si1C C1 -119.9(2) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 Si1C C1 -73.64(16) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Si1C C1 -19.19(18) 2 . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Si1C C1 130.51(17) . . . . ?
N2 Cu1 Si1C Si2C -152.50(13) . . . . ?
N1 Cu1 Si1C Si2C 25.07(15) . . . . ?
Cu2 Cu1 Si1C Si2C 71.29(4) . . . . ?
Cu1 Cu1 Si1C Si2C 125.75(5) 2 . . . ?
Si3C Cu1 Si1C Si2C -84.56(11) . . . . ?
C3 Si1C Si2C N1 -109.0(2) . . . . ?
C2 Si1C Si2C N1 139.7(3) . . . . ?
C1 Si1C Si2C N1 28.5(3) . . . . ?
Cu1 Si1C Si2C N1 -29.57(16) . . . . ?
237
241
Appendix B
Phosphorescence Spectra of Cu(I) Amides
1.0
0.8
0.6
300 K
77 K
0.4
0.2
0.0
400
450
500
550
600
650
/nm
242
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
300 K
77 K
0.2
0.0
400
450
500
550
600
650
700
/nm
243
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
300 K
77 K
0.2
0.0
450
500
550
600
650
/nm
244
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
300 K
77 K
0.2
0.0
450
500
550
600
650
/nm
245
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
300 K
77 K
0.2
0.0
450
500
550
600
650
/nm
Figure B-5. Corrected Phosphorescence Spectra Of Solid [CuNEt2]4, With 330 And
320 nm Excitation (300 K And 77 K Spectra, Respectively).
246
Vita
Muna BuFaroosha was born on April 18, 1967, to Saif and Fatama BuFaroosha
in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. She attended United Arab Emirates University where
she received her Bachelor of Science degree in chemistry in May of 1989. She attended
Michigan State University where she received her Master of Science degree in
chemistry in May 1995. In 1996 she began her Ph.D. study at Louisiana State
University and will receive the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in August 2002.
Currently, she is a teaching assistant in United Arab Emirates University. She is on
leave from her position at UAE University.
247