Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
SKILLS FORMATION
“achieving” “being fit”
UNDER-
(Youth) to to to (Old
STAND Age)
KNOW DO BE why
“hearing” “seeing”
INSTRUCTION WISDOM
Diagram 4
Because these four learning domains apply as much to the development of the individual as a
person as they do to the student as a potential minister, it is tempting to see in these domains a cycle of
a person’s life-span. Thus in youth a person acquires much knowledge, taking in much information
through instruction. Later (s)he develops in the area of achieving skills, learning how to do things.
Older adults enter the affective domain and become concerned with personal issues of character
formation and the importance of being themselves. Finally old age is reached and the stage of wisdom
experienced where insight into the nature of things, their design and purpose, becomes the prime
interest.
Diagram 4 puts all this together and suggests a gradual movement from the first to the second
domain (from acquiring knowledge to exercising skills) and from the third to the fourth domain (from
an interest in being to that of understanding). By contrast the movement from skills to formation is
represented by a sudden transition, suggesting the so-called “crisis of middle age” where the individual
questions his/her existence and place!
Of-course, all this is speculation, and for a Biblical perspective on the subject see the next note:
“Proverbs and Learning Domains”.
Curriculum Manual 71
DISCUSSION
How far does our three-fold division of Teaching, Preaching and Counselling match the Old
Testament way of Instruction, Correction and the imparting of Wisdom?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Curriculum Manual 71
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Curriculum Manual Appendix M 72
PASTORAL OBJECTIVES
2 Timothy 2
Although there is really no ultimate difference between goals, aims and objectives, it is
sometimes helpful to distinguish, say, pastoral goals and educational objectives. The
objectives chosen below are those that, if reached, will enable us to achieve our goals.
Indeed, it is possible to identify a hierarchy of Goals, Aims and Objectives. Achieving any
objective would, in this system, be one indication (among several others) that the aims were
being met, just as the aims, when met, would contribute to the achievement of the over-all
goal.
Thus we could outline goals, aims and objectives from a study of chapter two of second
Timothy as follows.
Indicators: SOLDIER. Objective: ‘To inspire loyalty in Jesus Christ at all times.’
Aim: ‘To reflect on what we say, and so allow the Lord to give insight into all this.’
i.e. ‘To train students to reflect on all they learn, to gain understanding.’
Indicators: WORKMAN Objective: ‘To enable people to handle God’s Word diligently.’
Traditionally Theological Education in the West has been wedded to four ideals:
• the construction of degree-driven programmes that bestow status through the award of paper
qualifications;
• the acquisition of knowledge through informative lectures and the research required to
complete a thesis;
• the establishment of academic standards (and thus also the credibility of the educational
institution) through submission to the scrutiny of accreditation bodies.
Increasing fragmentation has resulted from an emphasis on academic research and scholarship
(CONTENT) and student training for specialist roles (SPECIALISATION), rather than the preparation
for the work of equipping others for ministry (ENABLEMENT).
The modern stress on the interests of the student, which very rightly takes into consideration
his/her background and development,. has also led to thinking of theological education purely in terms
of roles (the expectations of others?) and of techniques (how to do this or that).This has resulted in the
introduction of separate disciplines of Theological Education /Training into the teaching Faculty, which
in turn has lead to an emphasis on the provision of information (including outlines of current
orthodoxies) rather than the exposition of the Bible, the Faith and its application to daily living in the
contemporary world.
Passing exams, acquiring a degree / diploma has largely replaced the development of a life of
prayer and the cultivation of a walk with God, leading to the disillusionment so common amongst
students once they enter a theological institution. The mode of education represented by the delivery of
lectures and the preparation of theses, together with a degree-driven curriculum and its accreditation by
an outside Board, may do much to enhance the academic standards. But it is also in danger of creating a
faculty of academic specialists out of touch with each other and with no sense of the integration of the
total programme. This can result in fragmented thinking as the student loses any sense of direction,
overall cohesion or even vision for what (s)he is doing.
The inadequacy of such an approach is seen in the fact that the traditional model is practically
divorced from such ideals as:
• contextualisation with its focus on the practical problems of church and world;
• the ministerial formation of the student in his/her relationship with God, others and self,
together with the development of his/her own gifts.
• the use of contemporary pedagogy that encourages learning through interaction in community
and subsequent reflection that is informed by both theological insight and person experience.