Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
for the
T Bureau of Land Management
U .S . Department of Interior
~
by
Carlos E . Restrepo, Ph .D .
F . Charles Lamphear, Ph .D .
Clare A . Gunn, Ph .D .
Robert B . Ditton, Ph .D .
John P . Nichols, Ph .D .
Linda S . Restrepo, M .B .A .
Restrepo & Associates
P .O . Box 13165
El Paso, Texas
79912
Robert M . Avent, Ph .D .
Contracting Officer's Authorized Representative
Bureau of Land Management
New Orleans Outer Continental Shelf Office
500 Camp Street
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DISCLAIMER
TITLE PAGE
. iii
LIST OF TABLES
. ix
. xiii
. xv
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 3
. 4
. 6
. 13
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 17
. 25
Introduction
. . . . . . . . .
Texas Coastal Tourism . . . . .
Tourism's Definitional Problems
A Functional Approach . . . . .
Texas Tourism Data
. . . . . .
Tourism Related to Recreation .
Rationale For Assessment
. . .
Procedures
. . . . . . . . . .
Assumptions and Limitations . .
Baseline Assessment . . . . . .
The Business Sector . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 49
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Model s
. . . . . . . . .
Receipts and Expenditures
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 57
. 60
Tourism Attribution
Oil Spill Impact
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 63
. 63
LIST OF FIGURES
ABSTRACT
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Impact Conditions
Impact Models . .
III .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
TOURISM
.
.
.
.
37
37
42
46
48
49
51
52
53
53
. 63
. 74
. , 75
Derivation of Impact
. . . . . .
Impacts on Employment and Incomes
Substitution Effects
. . . . . .
Positive Impact . . . . . . . . .
Negative Impacts
. . . . . . . .
Future Research Needs . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Experiential Information
.
.
.
.
.
.
77
79
84
84
84
85
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
89
89
90
91
Procedures , , , , , , , ,
Assumptions and Limitations
. , , , , ,
94
. 104
Baseline Assessment . . .
Coastal Recreation Supply
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 105
. 106
. 106
, 106
Employment Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Oil Spill Impacts on Recreation Activities
In The Study Area . . . . . . . . , , , , ,
Assessing Oil Spill Impacts on the Recreation
Industry
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impact Examples and Background
. . . . . , . .
Impacts on Employment and Wages . . . . . . , .
Substitution Effects
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 114
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
. ,
. 114
122
126
129
129
. 132
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 133
. 135
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 139
. 139
V . COMMERCIAL FISHING
Introduction
. . .
Purpose of Analysis
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
General Procedures
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
, , ,
. . .
. . .
. . .
.
.
.
.
Personal Income
. 164
. 140
140
141
141
157
, , , , , 164
, , , , , 168
, , , , . 168
Interviews ,
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , 168
Trends in Landings , , , , , , , , , ,
Direct Effects , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , 171
, , , , , 177
, , , , , 181
VI . MEDIA COVERAGE
Introduction
Methods , , ,
, , , , , , , , ,
Results , , , ,
Conclusion
. .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ,
, , , , , , , ,
. . . . . . . .
, , , , , , , , , , ,
VI
, , , ,
, , ,
. . .
. 185
, , , , , 185
, , , , , , 188
. . . . . . 206
, , , , , , , , , 211
.
.
.
.
.
A- 3
B- 3
APPENDIX
C- 3
APPENDIX
D- 3
Introduction
D- 3
D- 3
.
.
.
.
.
.
D- 9
D-11
.
.
..
.
.
APPENDIX
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
215
219
223
227
231
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
E- 3
APPENDIX
F- 3
APPENDIX
G- 3
Categories 799
APPENDIX
APPENDIX
H- 3
Introduction
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Indirect Impact Assessment Model
. .
Negative Indirect Impact Assessments
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
H- 3
H- 3
H- 6
H-17
I- 3
vii
LIST OF TABLES
1 .
2.
Sector Descriptions
. 32
Establishments
. 54
3.
. 62
4.
Business Activity
5 .
. 64
. 64
Beverage Activity
6 .
. 65
7.
. 66
8.
. 67
9.
. 68
. 78
. 80
. 81
. 82
. 83
10 .
11 .
Decrease
13 .
Decrease
15 .
of Tourism
of Tourism
12 .
. 92
16 .
. 96
17 .
. 112
. 113
Coastal Activities
18 .
19 .
. 115
20 .
. 116
ix
Recreation-Related Expenditures
by Subregion, 1976
. 117
22 .
Recreation-Related Expenditures
by Subregion, 1977
. 118
23 .
Recreation-Related Expenditures
by Subregion, 1978
. 119
24 .
25 .
Expenditures
26 .
. 120
. 121
. 121
. 123
125
127
143
144
147
30 .
31 .
32 .
148
151
152
153
154
155
156
1965, 1970-1979
37 .
List
40 .
of Tables, Cont'd .
Number of Fishermen by Employment Status and
42 .
43 .
44 .
45 .
46 .
47 .
. 158
. 159
. 161
. 163
. 165
. 166
. 167
. 172
. 173
. 176
. 178
52 .
53 .
Circulation Figures
54 .
55 .
D-1
Sector Descriptions
51 .
xi
179
. 190
195
199
204
D- 4
1979
. D- 7
Impacts by Subregion
. D-10
D-3
D-4
H-1
Sector Descriptions
H-2
H-3
. D-12
. H- 4
Impacts by Subregion
. H- 7
. H- 9
H-4
. H-11
H-5
Recreation
H-6
Other Retail
I-1
BLM Media
1-2
BLM Magazine
1-3
Data Summary
Data
. H-13
. H-15
. I- 3
Summary
. 1-14
. 1-15
xii
LIST OF FIGURES
.
. 7
. 19
. 22
. 28
. 39
. 41
7 .
. 43
8.
. 44
9 .
1 .
2.
IXTOC
3.
Economic Baseline
4.
5.
6 .
I Study Region
.
1978
. 45
. 47
11 .
. 50
12 .
13 .
. 70
14 .
15 .
. 72
16 .
17 .
. 95
18 .
. 98
. 99
100
101
102
22 .
xiii
21 .
20 .
10 .
19 .
69
. 71
73
103
107
108
109
110
111
130
131
145
25 .
26 .
27 .
28 .
29 .
31 .
32 .
Ferry
30 .
149
33 .
191
34 .
192
35 .
194
36 .
197
198
201
202
37 .
38 .
39 .
40 . BLM T .V .
. 207
Data Summary
41 . Graph of IXTOC
Traffic Counts
xiv
. 203
ABSTRACT
The IXTOC I Oil Spill Economic Impact Study presents an
economic assessment of the direct and indirect impacts of the
IXTOC I oil spill and the BURMAH AGATE sinking on the Tourism,
Recreation, and Commercial Fishing industries in 19 counties
along the Texas coastline . The oil spill impact period was
defined as the period from January 1979 to December 1981 . The
IXTOC I blowout occurred in June 1979 and was followed by the
sinking of the BURMAH AGATE some six mont:hs later .
The analysis of the economic effects of the IXTOC I and
BURMAH AGATE oil spills upon the study region was based on the
following methods : 1) the establishment of' a baseline of
regional economic activity prior to the disturbance, and 2) the
development, implementation, and interpretation of a density
gradient model for measuring direct impacts, and an inputoutput model for measuring indirect impacts .
Due to contract specifications and budget restrictions,
namely the specification of a nonsurvey approach, it was
assumed that the economic impact assessment of the oil spills
could be limited to 1) the current direct economic impacts on
the tourism, recreation, and commercial fishing industries, and
2) the current indirect, "induced-by" economic effects on the
supportive or related economic activities located in the study
region . The results of surveys and interviews served as the
foundation for estimating overall impact for the three major
industrial sectors .
Data on Tourism losses due to the oil spills provided
researchers sufficient evidence to quantify the direct economic
impact of the IXTOC I oil spill on the most affected area of
Subregion V, South Padre Island, from a low estimate of
$3,979,000 to a high estimate of $4,444,000 . There was no
apparent negative impact upon tourism in any subregion of the
Gulf coast as a result of the BURMAH AGATE sinking . This does
not mean that there was no tourism business negatively
affected ; rather, when evaluated on a subregional basis, there
was no negative impact . There were no indirect economic
impacts that exceeded $1 million . Thus, it appears that the
overall indirect economic impact due to the oil spills was
quite limited in the Tourism sector .
Data on recreation losses due to the oil spills indicate
that losses were not equally distributed within each subregion .
Rather, they were absorbed by a small number of businesses
close to the water's edge . The calculated losses, in terms of
gross receipts, across the three major affected regions (II,
IV, and V) indicate a total direct economic loss of $3,098,616
for the Standard Industrial Classification recreation sectors .
None of the indirect economic impacts exceeded $1 million .
These estimates, based upon the available data, support a
xv
xvi
0
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
~
N.
CHAPTER I . INTRODUCTION
volume of oil and gas was larger and that the fire was brighter
than before the attempt .
In September, Brown and Root, Inc . of Houston, Texas
constructed a large steel cone, called the Sombrero . The
Sombrero would be placed over the IXTOC well and be connected
to a separater/diverter to isolate the oil from the water . The
first time the Sombrero was taken to the location, it was
damaged by high seas and had to be taken back to Houston for
repairs . After repairs, the Sombrero was taken back out and
installed over the well . The Sombrero did not function
properly when it was in place . This was attributed to (1) the
turbulence around the well head--which carried the oil around
the Sombrero and (2) the escape of some of the oil from cracks
in the sea floor that were adjacent to the well's cracked
casing .
During mid-June, PEMEX began drilling the IXTOC IA and the
IXTOC IB . The IXTOC IB made contact with the IXTOC I in late
November . PEMEX reduced the flow of the oil well by pumping
steel balls and low density mud into the well . PEMEX was able
to cap the well on March 25, 1980 .
The U .S . response to the IXTOC I oil well blowout
initially consisted of flights over the oil slick to gather
information for slick trajectory models . The U .S . did not
immediately prepare for the oil slick because the National
Response Team was receiving reports from PEMEX that the capping
and clean-up operations were proceeding quickly .
The Regional Response Team (Coastal Region VI) and
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration met on July 13
and developed several plans of action : (1) To obtain samples
of oil at the edge of the slick and gather wind and current
data, (2) to conduct a vulnerability analysis of the Texas
coast to determine the priorities of the environments and (3)
to continue to monitor the oil slick movement . Several
universities were preparing to conduct biological and
geological analyses of the oil slick's impact on the Texas
coastline .
In late July, the available information indicated that the
slick would enter the U .S . waters in early August . Clean-up
equipment was deployed along the areas that were deemed to be
vulnerable, and more equipment was en route . The U .S . Coast
Guard boomed the Brazos Santiago Pass and several other inlets
to the ecologically sensitive Laguna Madre area . Oil skimmers
were deployed in front of the Brazos Santiago Pass, Port
Mansfield, Port Arthur, and Port O'Conner .
On August 6 and 7 tar balls began to wash ashore onto
Padre Island hotel beaches . Clean-up crews scraped the oil
from the beaches by using Vac-Alls, graders, and front-end
loaders . The oiled sand was dumped into a pit on Padre Island .
While the surface oil was controlled, divers found
submerged oil in concentrations of up to 3600 particles per
cubic metre in depths of up to 12 metres . The Coast Guard
deployed a heavy nylon net to trap submerged particles at the
Port Mansfield cut .
The oil stopped washing up on to the Texas shoreline by
mid-September . The seasonal change in the wind and off shore
currents began to reverse the northward flow of oil . Overhead
reconnaissance flights indicated that there were large clear
areas of water accompanied with smaller, occasional sheens of
oil . The Coast Guard reduced the clean-up operation, but
retained contractors on the scene until the end of the
hurricane season . In mid-September, Hurricane Fredrick removed
up to 95% of the oil that had accumulated on the Texas beaches .
In November, tar balls were again sighted in the Corpus Christi
and Brazos Santiago Pass areas . The Coast Guard reported that
there were no new slicks in the area and suggested that the
tides may have uncovered the weathered IXTOC I oil in the
subtidal zone .
There is a great deal of conjecture on the effectiveness
of the oil clean-up effort . In order to assess the
environmental and economic impact of the spilled oil, a
cooperative state and federal program was developed to
determine the extent of the damages . The damage assessment
program was prepared by the NOAA and the U .S . Environmental
Protection Agency--Region 6 . The cooperating federal agencies
were the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife
Service, the National Park Service, and the U .S . Geologic
Survey . The cooperating state agencies included : The
Department of Water Resources, the Bureau of Economic Geology,
the Parks and Wildlife Department, the General Land Office,
Corpus Christi State University, Texas A & I University, Texas
A & M University, and the University of Texas . The program
proposed to monitor the movement of the spill, analyze the rate
of uptake of hydrocarbons within various resources, and conduct
damage assessment studies for various resources . The schedule
of the budget is 4 .2 million--first year with the remaining 5 .6
million over the following two years .
SCOPE
This examination's extent is an economic investigation,
through time, of the oil spill's impact on the Texas coastline .
Nineteen counties along the Texas coastline were selected for
the study and divided into five subregions :
( See Figure 1)
I . Orange, Jefferson
II . Harris, Chambers, Galveston, Brazoria
III . Wharton, Matagorda, Jackson, Victoria, Calhoun
GOLIAD
BEE
SUBREGION 3
REFUGIO
~
.
.. .. .
~~~
JIM WELLS
ARANSAS
n , o~
\
SANPATRICIO
~ . : : : .. . . . .;. . . .r' s
- ~ NUECES
~
~~
~-----
i
%
771
n / SUBREGION 4
KLEBERG ~ll) /
~
~
.
. . . . . .': : : :/
3 LEAGUE LINE
BROOKS r:1
. . ., ._ . ., . . _ .J KENEDY
11
~
~ SUBREGION 5
`:r:i;:i:. . . . .:?.~. WILLACY r,
HIDALGO
:.,r
. . . . . . . . . . . . .~:~1;1 CAMERON
Figure 1
TEXAS COASTAL COUNTIES
10
11
12
13
CHAPTER II
METHODOLOGY OF IMPACT STUDY
17
18
the measurement
,. .
I~ . . . .
~
I
MONTG l ~
OMERY
\1' _~
/f3ER7v
,1
~
.~ HARDIN~
y` ~
----1
ORnNIJEFERSON'/
[
. 9
; .`
HARRIS
CHAMDERS
FORTDEND\.'~Y
/
J
~
GALVESTON
\
WHARTON
tiRA?ORIA
SUBREGION 2
JACKSON
\
SUBREGION
MAiAGORDA
/=
~ VICTORIA
CAi .HOUN
/~' LIBREGION 3
HEFUGIO
. .
C~
'~
ARANSAS
--J
.\GO
C1.
~ .--- : ' cANPATRICIO
j iMWELLS
t
r.
Z/
~ NUECE3
r
'
I
5
----
t KLEEIERG
/
3
BROOKS
LEAGUE
LINE
KENEDY O
;.~------ ~~
;~
WILLACY
fH
/ ..
SUBREGION 5
U4GO
.r_-~~_
1
CAMERON
i
~1
Figure 2
IXTOC I STUDY REGION
19
20
21
'
RECENT PAST ECONOMIC
CONDITIONS
PROJECTED BASELINE
ECONOMIC I
CONDITIONS - .
r r r -~
~ ECONOMIC IMPACT
LEVEL OF
ECONOMIC
ACTIVITY
~ OBSERVED
~ LEVEL OF
ECONOMIC
ACTIVITY
START OF
STUDY PERIOD
TIME
31110-
Figure 3
ECONOMIC BASELINE
(HYPOTHETICAL)
22
END OF
STUDY PERIOD
Investment Impacts
Direct
Indirect
Induced-by
Stemming-from
Direct
Indirect
Induced-by
Stemming-from
23
24
ASSUMPTION :
25
26
27
I M PACT
DENSITY
SCALE 1
(PERCENT) '
1
~
t
~
~
~
~
~
SHORELINE
INLAND
DISTANCE
Figure 4
28
29
30
the five subregions for the period 1979 through 1981 . This
made it necessary to construct 18 regional input-output models,
including annual models for 1979, 1980, and 1981 for the total
study region and similar annual models for each of the five
subregions . Applying the following assumptions, the models
were developed from the 1972 Texas Input-Output Mode1 .2
ASSUMPTION : The Texas model could be modified
to reflect economic relations
within the study region .
ASSUMPTION : The 1972 inter-industry relationships of the Texas model could be
adequately updated to reflect
inter-industry relationships for
the 1979, 1980, and 1981 periods .
Procedures used to "regionalize" and "update" the 1972
Texas model for the substate coastal area economies are
thoroughly discussed in the Input-Output M odel for Econom ic
Analysis, Instructional Manual .
A listing of the sectors contained in the 18 regional
input-output models developed for this study are given in Table
1 . This table will be useful for interpreting the sector
impact estimates given in later chapters .
Water
31
Texas
Department of
Table 1
Sector Descriptions
Sector No .
I
2
3
Sector
Title
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Crop Production
Livestock & Livestock Products
Agricultural Supply, Ginning & Agri .
Services
Primary Forestry
Commercial Fishing
Crude Pet . & Natural Gas
Natural Gas Liquids
Oil and Gas Services
Other Mining
Construction
Meat Products
Dairies
Grains
Bakeries and Foods
15
Beverages
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Textiles
Wood and Furniture
Newspapers & Printing
Chemicals
Petroleum
Plastic, Leather, and Glass
Clay, Stone, and Cement
Metals
Machinery
Electrical Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Other Manufacturing
28
Railroad
29
30
31
32
33
34
Motor Vehicle
Water Transportation
Air and Other Transportation
Telephone
Radio and Television
Other Communication
35
Gas Services
36
37
Electric Services
Water and Sanitary Services
38
Wholesale Automotive
39
40
41
42
43
Groceries
Farms, Wholesale, Machine Products
Machinery Wholesale, Machine Products
General Wholesale
Retail Lumber Yards
32
Table 1 cont'd
Sector No .
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
Sector Title
Hospitals
Education
Colleges
Other Services
Outdoor Recreation
Households
Sector Totals
33
w
CHAPTER III
('
TOURISM
..
ja'i
.6.4
tM u%ILy
I . INTRODUCTION
This report includes the methods used and the results
obtained by studying the tourist activity along the Texas Gulf
coast and making an assessment of the possible impact of the
oil spills caused by the sinking of the BURMAH AGATE and the
blowout of IXTOC I Mexican oil well in the Bay of Campeche in
1979 . Incidental to the main purpose of the oil spill impact,
the study reveals the status of data collection and monitoring
of tourism and the need for improvement in models and regular
measures . The following report includes three main sections :
(1) a description of coastal tourism in Texas, its
relationship to recreation and the rationale used in the study
of oil spill impact contained in this section ; (2) a discussion
of the several economic models available and the methods used
in this study to establish a baseline of tourist activity ; and
(3) a description of the impact and its implications .
TEXAS COASTAL TOURISM
Texas coastal tourism in a modern context is relatively
new, although it has old antecedents . A few remnants of a late
nineteenth century resort era can be found today, such as the
Luther Hotel in Palacios and the newly remodeled Galvez in
Galveston . However, in those pre-air conditioned, turn-of-thecentury-days, Texas was not generally caught up in tourist and
resort development compared with that in upper New York or the
Great Lakes region . In fact, Southerners dominated northern
cool resort areas to escape the heat and disease then prevalent
in the South . The South was the market ; the North, the
destination .
Texas and its Gulf coast encountered a gradual growth of
tourism throughout the post-WWII years but did not experience a
real breakthrough until the late 1960s . Several factors seemed
to converge to bring Texas into the spotlight of tourist
development in these later years . For one thing, the great
economic expansion of the "sun-belt" and the media coverage of
Texas as a boom industrial and business development area
brought increasing masses of visitors . The great expansion of
reservoirs in Texas, heretofore a region without inland water
for recreation, together with new Gulf coast publicity,
skyrocketed the state into the marketplace for water-based
recreation and tourism . The completion of the prime Interstate
routes to Texas in this period, for the first time, provided
easy automobile access to Texas . And the establishment of the
Texas Tourist Development Agency in 1973, providing for the
mass out-of-state promotion for the first time, had a great
effect on tourism expansion . This expansion began in the late
1960s and developed further through the 1970s . The number of
out-of-state visitors to Texas rose from slightly over 11
million in 1963 to 23 .2 million in 1977 (Texas Tourist Industry
37
Growth : 1978) .
The Gulf coast, as a special region of Texas, has
gradually risen in popularity, and in 1979, ranked fifth as a
destination within the state, compared with the Hill Country,
east, west, and north Texas (1979 Report : n .d ., 3) . In that
year the coast attracted 3,750,900 short-term U .S . visitors
(those staying less than 30 days) and 393,700 long-term
visitors (over 30 days) . In recent years certain segments of
this coast, such as Corpus Christi and South Padre Island, have
become much better known nationally as tourist destinations,
especially for winter visitors .
So, in recent decades the market-destination relationship
between the South and the North has generally reversed . Texas
and the Gulf coast have now become more popular as
destinations, and much of this is due to the nation's increased
interest in the coast and its many amenities .
Coastal tourist amenities offer a special mix unlike other
destinations . Coastal cities contain convention facilities,
sports arenas, and museums, much like other cities, but the
marine-land interface places them in a different context . The
proximity of beaches, bays, rivers, and estuarine resources
provide an array of attractions important to tourists . Coastal
wildlife observation, photography, coastal fishing, shell
collecting, surfing, and diving offer special appeals, but
probably the greatest of all is that of coastal aesthetics .
Viewing vast streches of open waters, feeling sea breezes,
listening to the special waterfront sounds and marveling at
sunsets on the water are part of the coastal tourism experience
mosaic . Conservation and restoration of historic sites,
buildings, and artifacts in recent years have added a
significant new set of appeals . Coastal cities had an
especially romantic past, just now being rediscovered,
redeveloped, and interpreted, adding to the appeal to tourists .
Especially important have been several historic redevelopments
in Galveston : Ashton Villa, Bishop's Palace, and the Strand .
The term, "coastal tourism," implies a linear geographic
region at the water-land interface with homogeneous
characteristics paralleling the water's edge all along the
coast, which is partly true . For example, the coast could be
divided into a series of littoral zones, each having somewhat
different capability for tourism, as illustrated in Figure 5
(Gunn : 1970, 13) . Between the extremes of oceanic and
terrestrial zones, the coast could be divided into four
development zones for tourism . The "neritic" zone, defined as
a near-shore marine zone spreading from the continental shelf
to the beach, is the richest zone for fishing and often
contains interesting bars and reefs . It is well suited to
cruising and sailing and sometimes is used for travel to nearby
islands . Visual contact is dominantly with the sea rather than
38
Terrestrial
..................... . .. . .. . . . . . ... . ........... .. . .. . ........... ... . . ..
4 . VICINAGE
... . . . . . . .. . . .. ... ... ... .. ................ ........... .... .... . . .. . . .
Coastal 3 . SHORELAND
. . . . . . Tourism- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~~ Recreation _ ~ 2 . BEACH
1 . NERITI
Oceanic
Figure 5
39
the land . The "beach" zone reaches both into water and onto
the land and, especially if wide and sandy, supports the most
popular of water-based tourist activities : relaxing, building
sand castles, shore water activities, and beach sports . Also
very important in this zone are other activities such as
watching and photographing people, the surf, shore birds, plant
life, and the sunsets . The "shoreland" lies behind the beach
and offers a base for camping, picnicking, and hiking, and some
locations support hotels and other service businesses . Visual
connection with the sea is important . Coastal backland labeled
"vicinage," is frequently well suited to support coastal
tourism and is also the locale for vacation homes . Visual
linkage may or may not be important, but these zones can be
delineated along most coasts and suggest a strong littoral
consistency .
Experience with the development of tourism shows that a
lineal pattern is countered by other factors, which vary from
one subregion to another, and tend to create tourism nodes
along the coast . For example, on the Texas Gulf coast,
climatic and other physical differences are quite pronounced
from Louisiana to Mexico . Near Louisiana, the rainfall
averages 137 centimetres, growing season about 245 days (also
more useful tourism days), and a mean annual temperature of
21 (Celsius) . Adjacent to Mexico, however, the coast has
annual rainfall of 66 centimetres, a 320-day growing season,
and a mean annual temperature of 23 (Celsius) . The difference
is especially important to winter tourism development toward
Mexico (Texas Coastal Maps : 1975, lA and 1B) . Areas of
coastal flooding and hurricane washover are not uniform from
one end of the Gulf coast to the other (Texas Coastal Maps :
1975, 4A and 4B) . Soils are not uniform and are generally more
sandy toward Mexico and clayey and loamy toward Louisiana
(Texas Coastal Maps : 1975, 5A and 5B) . Historical and
archeological backgrounds also vary (Texas Coastal Maps : 1975,
8A and 8B) .
Perhaps of even greater significance is the nodal clustering of tourist activity at or near cities, especially along the
coast (Figure 6) . Transportation termini--airports, bus
terminals, train stations, harbors, car rental centers--are in
or near cities, not in between . The Interstate highway system
is designed to interconnect cities . Tourist service businesses
often serve both local and travel markets and, therefore, are
more successful in or near cities . Access to the coast from
inland areas is generally directed toward cities .
If the above principles of coastal tourism are applied to
the Texas Gulf coast, one can expect the greatest
concentrations of tourist activity to occur at four main nodes :
Beaumont-Port Arthur, Houston-Galveston, Corpus Christi area,
and Brownsville-Harlingen . A less well-defined node occurs in
the Victoria-Port Lavaca area . Using the total gross receipts
40
r
VISITORS
~
, \\\\\\\ .
\
~-r
. .~
~ :a
Figure 6
41
1 -
Subregion 2
Subregion 4
Subregion 5 -
42
43
36
621
5,490
48
~ SUBREGION
665
168
395
SUBREGION 2
59
131
192
~
80
SUBREGION
47
~
/
52
~
131
\/
~
754
~ 1
90
'
SUBREGION
/
I
.
52
SUBREGION 5
576
Figure 8
4a -
39
~
~
276
~ SUBREGION
I
92
10
38
SUBREGION 2
5
18
~/
17
SUBREGION 3
~
43
2 8
,
0
138
~\
SUBREGION 4
9
SUBREGION 5
7
114
Figure 9
45
46
TOURISTS
Characteristics
Location
Activity Interests
4F
Cultural Patterning
Seasonality
INFORMATIONDIRECTION
~
TRANSPORTATION
To Attractions
Promotion
Descriptions
Guides
Directions
To Cities
Within Attractions
ATTRACTIONS
Things to see and do
Lures to Travel
Things that Satisfy
2
SERVICESFACILITIES
Lodging
Food and Beverage
Retail Products
Figure 10
47
48
FOR ASSESSMENT
49
Figure 11
50
51
52
II . BASELINE
ASSESSMENT
53
I . COMMERCIAL RECREATION
A . Businesses
recreationists :
Amusement parks
Beauty shops
Billiards, pool
Bowling alleys
Camps, group, organization
Camps, overnight, RV (some)
Carnivals, circuses
Ca s i n o s
Charter fishing, boat services
Coin game arcades
Convention facilities
Cruise ships
Cultural, historic attractions
Custom charter tours
Golf courses, country clubs
Health, fitness clubs
B . Businesses
that sell or rent equipment or products or
provide services directly to recreationists :
Airlines
Airplane rental, sales
Bicycle rental, sales
Book stores
Buslines
Canoe Liveries
CB, stereo, hi-fi shops
Coin, stamp stores
Condo management firms
Costume rental, sales
Drug stores
Fishing equipment, bait sales
Food stores
Gardening equipment, sales
Hobby, craftshops
54
Accounting firms
Advertising agencies
Attorneys
Automobile, boat mfgs .
Building suppliers, builders
Business management firms
Designers, planners
Architects
Drug manufacturers
Food producers
Food sales
Insurance firms
A.
Businesses
Boat rental
Car rental
Chartered bus
Chartered plane
Businesses
Cottages, apartments
(for travel)
Hostels
Hotels, motels, inns
C . Businesses
beverage :
55
D . Continued
Convention facilities Tennis clubs
Cruise ships Theaters, live
Cultural, historic attractions Theaters, movie, drive-in
Custom charter, tours Tour bus guides
Golf courses, country clubs Winter sports resorts
Health, fitness clubs
E . Businesses that sell or rent equipment or products or
provide services directly to tourists :
Airplane rentals, sales
Bicycle rentals, sales
Bookstores
Canoe liveries
CB, stereo, hi-fi shops
Coin, stamp stores
Condo management firms
Drug stores
Fishing equipment, bait
Hobby, crafts shops
Hunting equipment sales
Jogging, health equipment
Marinas
Musical instrument stores
Off-road vehicle rentals
Party goods rental, sales
Photographic
RV rentals, sales
Skiing equipment, clothes
Sporting goods stores
Tobacco stores
Toy, games stores
Vacation home sales
Wilderness outfitters
Mass media
Mechanics (auto, plane,
boat)
Medical, ambulance
Recreational equipment
Realtors
Security personnel
Sports equipment mfrs .
Tax accountants
Telephone, telex
Travel, vacation apparel
Wholesalers, distributors
56
MODELS
The literature on tourism economic models necessary for a
baseline revealed a number of isolated approaches, each created
for, and adapted to, specific needs . The following discussion
is not meant to be exhaustive but represents the diversity of
approaches used in recent years .
1 . For Mexico, Boltvinik (1979, 57) expanded on five
areas of economic characteristics of tourism : balance of
trade, tourism component of the gross domestic product,
multiplier effect on product, multiplier effect on employment
and income, and multiplier effect on domestic economy . For the
identification of establishments encompassed by tourism, the
following 13 were used in input-output analysis :
meat and dairy products
fruit and vegetables
wheat and its products
alcoholic beverages
beer
nonalcoholic beverages
petroleum
commerce
hotels and restaurants
transportation
communications
amusement
medical service
The amounts attributable to tourism, domestic, or export, are
not defined but come from time series data collected by a
governmental office of statistics .
2 . At the city level, three studies have particular
interest because of their diversity . Babul, Lintz, and
Somersan (1978) evaluated the tourism and recreation impact on
three resort communities in northern Wisconsin : Minocqua,
Woodruff, and Algoma . Direct impacts were measured by survey
of hotels, vacation homes, campgrounds, resorts, and other
locations . Multipliers were used to determine further impacts,
including taxes paid to governments . The study results were
based upon primary survey data .
Another northern study, but for a much larger city, was
that done by Blank and Petkovich (1979) for the twin cities of
Minneapolis and St . Paul . For this study of the 7-county
metropolitan area, tourists were defined as all travelers
coming to the area, whether or not a night's stay was involved .
The reasons for travel were many, including visits to friends
and relatives, work or business, personal business, recreation,
sightseeing, entertainment, shopping, conferences, and merely
"because that's where the road goes or the plane stops ."
57
.43%
.80%
.68%
.68%
.41%
58
45
411
55
554
air transportation
taxicab companies
(except 554) automobile dea lers
gasoline service stations
443
44
701
703
152,1531
78,79
53,59
recreation service
retail stores
(TEIM : 1975, 4) .
58
59
$1,325,400,000
18 .2%
Automobile transportation
Lodging
1,697,800,000
1,071,200,000
23 .5%
14 .7%
Food
1,956,100,000
26 .9%
613,200,000
601,700,000
8 .4%
8 .3%
Public transportation
TOTAL $7,265,400,000
(1977-78 Impact : 1980,7,9)
100 .0%
For the same year, 1978, the estimates for Texas tourism
produced by the State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation were as follows for U . S . visitors, short term
(less than 30 days) :
Automobile Travel :
$848,141,820
811,698,230
702,367,440
Food
Lodging
Auto Expense
Entertainment
Other
TOTAL
Air, Bus,
Rail Travel :
TOTAL
25 .6%
24 .5%
21 .2%
308,114,020
9 .3%
642,732,470
19 .4%
$3,313,054,000
100 .0%
$1,020,316,000
$4,333,370,000
60
expenditures on
( total state)
61
502,030,420
-------- =
4,429,512,167
.1135
Table 3 .
TOTAL STATE TOURISM EXPENDITURES, 1970-1979
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Total
$ 976,134,000
23
$ 224,510,820
1,305,367,000
1,588,984,000
1,500,665,000
22
20
22
287,180,720
317,796,800
330,146,300
2,186,654,000
2,851,489,000
3,163,529,000
23
22
23
3,520,017,000
3,313,054,000
3,563,261,000
21
21
502,930,420
627,327,580
727,611,670
739,203,570
29
Automotive
695,741,340
1,033,345,600
(SDHPT: 1970-80) .
62
%
27
25
24
26
24
26
25
26
26
25
Food
$ 263,556,180
326,341,750
381,356,160
390,172,900
524,796,960
741,387,140
790,882,250
915,204,420
861,394,040
890,814,020
63
Table 4.
TOURISM PROPORTION OF TOTAL AUTOMOTIVE BUSINESS ACTIVITY
Year
Automotive Expenditures*
Gross Receipts**
Ratio
1974
$ 502,930,420
$ 4,429,512,167
.1135
1975
627,327,580
4,991,858,869
.1256
1976
5,570,681,442
5,761,838,868
5,655,749,697
.1306
1977
1978
727,611,670
739,203,570
695,741,340
1979
1,033,345,600
7,252,763,227
.1425
.1283
.1230
"SDHPT
**Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
Table 5 .
TOURISM PROPORTION OF TOTAL FOOD AND BEVERAGE ACTIVITY
Year
Food Expenditures*
1974
1975
1976
$ 524,796,960
741,387,140
790,882,250
1977
1978
915,204,420
861,394,040
1979
890,814,020
Gross Receipts"
$ 2,254,677,980
2,748,897,178
3,312,439,429
3,885,520,191
4,526,208,809
5,200,640,723
* From Table 4
**Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts
64
Ratio
.2328
.2699
.2388
.2355
.1903
.1713
Table 6.
TOURISM EXPENDITURES, BY SUBREGION, 1976
(in dollars)
Subregion Quarter
1
Automotive
Food
Lodging Total
$ 2,441,790
$4,454,721
$ 2,150,561
2
3
4
2,674,688
5,343,084
2,386,030
2,632,729
3,478,008
4,947,061
2,505,952
2,310,232
11,227,215
19,835,327
1
2
88,922,572
44,666,949
27,377,862
77,579,397
47,529,452
33,606,233
78,403,025
48,997,868
33,570,056
76,033,111
48,015,578
29,208,923
320,938,105
189,209,847
123,763,074
1,205,439
2,229,902
1,109,837
1,414,136
2,449,272
1,147,992
1,502,422
1,434,428
1,441,000
2,532,683
2,345,068
5,562,997
9,556,925
4,854,880
1
2
3,446,142
4,368,753
3
4
4,439,393
4,045,673
4,940,570
5,581,845
5,771,611
5,298,391
3,542,965
5,255,713
6,853,785
3,293,507
16,299,961
21,582,417
18,945,970
993,474
1,003,791
921,775
2,552,998
4,039,806
2,448,794
2,436,944
1,197,733
2,344,112
3,876,506
4,766,719
2,045,228
4,116,773
9,782,848
14,728,259
1
2
3
4
5,090,461
65
9,352,775 $ 40,415,317
633,911,026
1,162,693
19,974,802
56,828,348
28,627,880
Table 7 .
TOURISM EXPENDITURES, BY SUBREGION,1977
(in dollars)
Subregion
Quarter
Automotive
Food
1
2
3
4
$ 2,628,480
3,185,152
$ 5,033,172
5,619,396
$ 2,540,556
2,710,834
3,078,400
3 ,172,352
5,776,572
6,307,100
2,698,965
2,564,341
12,064,384
22,736,240
10,514,696
1
2
76,635,392
90,511,104
48,290,556
56,741,952
34,805,944
66,253,568
56,246,588
40,227,862
73,377,920
58,350,056
34,853,390
306,777,984
219,629,152
148,575,004
1,268,352
2,360,472
1,233,268
1,494,144
2,649,336
1,423,421
3
4
1,618,176
2,813,592
1,446,367
1 , 644,032
2,651,124
1,409,780
6,024,704
10,474,524
5,512,836
3,868,672
3,816,778
5,799,132
4,409,088
5,278,976
5,483,460
6,262,260
6,538,616
4,893,568
6,214,084
3,816,148
18,450,304
24,498,420
20,717,336
969,728
946,432
2,743,264
2,566,264
4,039,678
1,510,528
1,812,096
2,673,408
2,751,996
5,238,784
10,734,932
1
2
1
2
3
4
66
Lodging
Total
$ 45,315,320
38,687,808
674,982,140
22,012,064
7,285,278
63,666,060
3,869,954
5,193,259
2,884,866
15,987,757
31,961,473
Table 8
TOURISM EXPENDITURES, BY SUBREGION, 1978
(in dollars)
Subregion
Quarter
$ 2,657,538
2,791,731
Food
$ 4,674,190
Lodging
Total
$ 3,002,592
3,064,030
3,103,044
3,807,465
5,095,610
5,228,840
5,741,990
12,359,778
20,800,630
13,252,657 $ 46,413,065
1
2
3
61,646,124
48,537,400
48,567,610
45,691,624
68,811,243
56,142,910
54,374,960
262,470,046
207,622,880
1,463,331
2
3
1,572,309
1,760,991
2,066,440
2,420,600
1,738,097
2,559,490
2,596,350
6,535,728
9,642,880
7,027,598 23,206,206
4,676,706
5,304,230
2
3
4,489,746
4,881,009
5,917,740
6,511,490
4,477,722
7,151,699
5,082,114
5,738,000
19,129,575
23,471,460
1
2
1,686,575
1,624,338
2,622,380
3
4
1,652,382
1,604,780
2,366,450
2,557,020
2,572,980
6,568,075
10,118,830
2
3
4
Automotive
56,811,855
75,200,824
67
3,351,645
3,834,390
50,563,771
50,436,616
42,984,430
189,676,441 659,769,367
1,605,803
1,703,445
2,027,266
1,691,084
8,682,724
4,538,125
24,850,270 67,451,305
5,567,054
4,931,722
8,902,169
3,526,310
22,927,255 39,614,160
Table 9
TOURISM EXPENDITURES, BY SUBREGION, 1979
(in dollars)
Subregion Quarter Automotive Food Lodging Total
1 1 $ 3,346,057 $ 4,721,994 $ 3,458,167
2 4,023,877 5,155,137 3,738,870
3 4,822,675 5,145,732 3,785,096
4 5,595,876 5,494,572 3,816,478
17,788,485 20,517,435 14,798,611 $ 53,104,531
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
78,715,494
83,686,740
122,786,378
119,414,724
51,625,242
54,211,617
57,030,210
56,812,869
45,249,576
57,673,623
58,339,557
54,404,765
404,603,336
219,812,869
215,667,521
1,935,934
2,370,940
2,521,662
2,976,400
2,260,962
2,582,613
2,696,157
2,573,379
1,999,750
2,146,173
2,300,548
2,043,625
9,804,936
10,113,111
8,490,096
5,468,606
5,911,334
6,378,229
6,965,244
4,885,526
6,116,841
6,340,167
5,699,772
5,950,172
8,349,406
9,530,058
5,029,825
24,723,413
23,042,306
28,859,461
2,087,657
2,656,035
2,394,964
3,148,860
2,705,220
2,646,527
2,626,560
2,621,943
6,137,241
5,924,402
6,637,046
3,104,436
10,287,516
10,600,250
21,803,125
68
839,950,795
28,408,143
76,625,180
42,690,891
Millions $
30
FOO D
20
AUTOMOTIVE
10
LODGING
1976 1977
1978 1979
Figure 12
69
Millions $
500
I
~~
~
~
400
AUTOMOTIVE
300
i
FOOD
200
LODGING
100
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 13
70
Millions $
30
20
FOO D
10
AUTOMOTIVE
LODGING
Figure 14
71
Millions $
30
LODGING
FOOD
00
20
5AUTOMOTIVE
10
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 15
72
Millions $
30
20
LODGING
10
FOOD
AUTOMOTIVE
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 16
73
74
General Information
The estimation of impacts throughout the coast was not
always consistent, apparently influenced by many variables .
The inconsistent policy on allocation of gasoline to the
various parts of the coast during this period influenced travel
greatly and unevenly . In the Brownsville area, it was reported
that the value of the peso dropped, depressing the number of
visitors through that area in 1979 . Generally, those areas
closest to the beach were affected by the oil spill, and some
businesses reported considerable loss of tourist activity .
Some indicated that the shortages of water on South Padre
Island had an even greater impact than the oil spill . The
depressed business along the beach in this area was reported to
have stimulated better business inland . One lodging business
in Brownsville reported better business during the period as a
reaction to the bad publicity and higher prices on the beach .
The central and upper reaches of the coast reported that
their tourism was more dependent upon oil production and
general industry than upon beach recreation . Therefore, they
did not feel an impact of either oil spill .
Several respondents emphasized that where there was
impact, it was particularly serious because of the timing-coming right within their peak tourist business period . In
other words, any impact occurring during the summer months
would influence business more than other times of the year .
75
76
77
Table 10
Actual 1979 Tourism Activity
SECTOR
SUBREGION 5
Automotive
$10,287,516
Food
Lodging
10,600,250
21,803,125
CAMERON
COUNTY
$9,820,911
10,244,268
21,582,889
78
S . PADRE I . AREA
$2,455,228
2,561,067
5,395,722
Automotive
53 .5/2 = 27 percent
Food
62 .0/2 = 31 percent
Lodging
49 .5/2 = 25 percent
Automotive
Food
Lodging
this results in
Low Estimate
High Estimate
7 .7 percent
9 .3
8 .5 percent
10 .2
7 .3
8 .0
79
Table 11 .
Average
Percent
Estimated
Number in
Percent
x
Survey
Decrease
Number
Percent
Area
Number
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
0
1
1
8
3
6
2
4
1
0
0
4
4
31
12
23
7
15
4
0
0
1
1
9
4
7
2
4
1
0
0
15
25
315
180
385
130
300
85
0
26
100
29
Av . 49 .5%
Decrease
80
Table 12 .
Average
Percent
Decrease
Survey
Number
Percent
Estimated
Number in
Area
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
0
1
0
0
0
2
6
3
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
17
50
25
0
0
0
12
0
0
0
25
72
36
0
0
0
180
0
0
0
1375
4680
2700
0
0
144
Av . 62 .0%
Decrease
12
100
81
Percent
x
Number
Table 13 .
Average
Percent
Decrease
Survey
Number
Percent
Estimated
Number in
Area
Percent
x
Number
5
15
25
35
45
55
65
75
85
95
1
0
0
1
3
2
3
1
1
0
8
0
0
8
25
17
25
8
8
0
3
0
0
3
11
7
11
3
3
0
15
0
0
105
495
385
715
225
255
0
12
99
41
Ay .53 .5%
Decrease
*Based on assumption that 1/3 of the reported "Miscellaneous" businesses were gasoline service
stations .
82
Table 14
Est. 1979
without
decrease
Est.
decrease
%
Automotive
$3,363,326
- 27
$908,098
$953,503
$862,693
Food
$3,711,691
- 31
$1,150,624
$1,208,156
$1,093,094
Lodging
$7,194,296
-25
$1,798,574
$1,888,503
$1,708,645
$3,857,296
$4,050,161
$3,664,431
Sector
Est.
Decrease
$14,269,313
83
+5%
-5%
100 percent .
SUBSTITUTION EFFECTS
Throughout the investigation, true substitution effects
within tourism were not discernible, largely due to the
relatively insignificant impact of the oil spills on overall
tourism in the entire region . In perspective, the travel
jitters, due to gasoline problems and escalating prices, seemed
to be of much greater concern to tourists when making decisions
about travel . Tourist travel to the coast may have been
changed elsewhere because of adverse publicity and gasoline
lines, particularly in the Houston area ; however, there is no
specific evidence to indicate that fact . A small amount of
substitution existed in Subregion V with evidence that one
motel in Harlingen replaced lodging closer to the beach during
the peak of the oil spill publicity . Overall, substitution of
tourism activity was of little significance .
POSITIVE IMPACT
This investigation revealed very little in the way of
positive impacts on tourism from the oil spills . The only
discernible impact was the occasional increase in lodging in
areas away from the beach, observed only in Subregion V . A few
reports in Harlingen indicated that visitors opted to stay
there rather than the beach area when they learned of the IXTOC
I oil spill threat . Any such impacts, however, were not
quantifiable and were masked by other fluctuations in tourism
activity .
"
NEGATIVE
IMPACTS
to 9 percent
to 10 percent
to 8 percent
( $ 863,000 to $ 954,000)
( $1,093,000 to $1,208,000)
( $1,709,000 to $1,889,000)
71 ,
? ,+. ~ "~ o~,
, ._
Of equal, and perhaps even greater importance, was the
negative indirect
impact ( see Appendix D) . This research,
especially the int erviews, indicates that tourism was most
84
85
CHAPTER IV
RECREATION
rv
,~---~
.~
CHAPTER IV . RECREATION
I . INTRODUCTION
The objective of this report was to study the recreation
services sector in a 19-county study area to assess the extent
of impacts, if any, of the IXTOC I and BURMAH AGATE oil spills
in 1979 . The report is divided into three sections : (1) a
background for coastal recreation, a rationale for studying
spill impacts, procedures and assumptions and limitations ; (2)
data and information relative to recreation activity during the
pre-spill (1974-1978) baseline period ; and (3) a quantification
of impacts associated with the two spills as well as a
qualitative review of impact examples, discussion of the role
of the media, and a review of future research needs .
COASTAL RECREATION BACKGROUND
Recreation is generally regarded as one of the largest and
fastest growing coastal activities . Previous studies by the
U .S . Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (1979) show
that water-based recreation activities, particularly those
which require little investment or equipment, are among the
most popular . This popularity, with the trend towards
population concentration in the coastal margin, means an
increasing demand for coastal recreation resources and
services . Today, people are beaching, fishing, and boating
more than ever before, creating crowding for others and overuse
pressures on natural resources and man-made facilities . The
demand for coastal recreation has grown rapidly as trends
towards more leisure, discretionary income, and mobility enable
larger segments of the population to seek recreation activity
of all types .
Although the provision of coastal recreation resources and
experiences is viewed by many to be a public responsibility,
the private sector is also involved in providing the necessary
man-made resource developments to lure visitors to the coastal
region . The resultant public and private recreation resources
or attractions, as Gunn (1979) refers to them, provide the
necessary "energizing power" for a variety of other primarily
private sector tourism components . To make this point relative
to South Padre Island, both the beaches and the air conditioned
hotel accom modations are primary components of the island's
tourism and recreation activity . Without these components,
other public and private investments may be meaningless . As
Gunn suggests, tourism should be viewed as a functional system
rather than a series of mutually exclusive and unrelated units .
Recreation resources (public and private) and the opportunities
they provide are a part of this functional system . To predict
the extent to which various coastal areas are used for
recreation, a look beyond the quantity and quality of natural
resources available is needed in order to understand the
89
90
91
Table 15
August 11, 1979 "So far it is not serious--it is a big to do about nothing at this
point," Governor William Clements
November 1, 1979 BURMAH AGATE and MIMOSA collide
November 9, 1979 Oil from the BURMAH AGATE spill hits beaches at San Jose Island
near Port Aransas
November 20, 1979 Heavy oil coats Galveston beaches
January 9, 1980 Fire on the BURMAH AGATE burned out
March 26, 1980
IXTOC I is capped
92
93
PROCEDURES
To assess the impacts of the IXTOC I oil spill on
recreation, several procedural steps were necessary . First, it
was necessary to separate artificially the areas of recreation
and tourism for purposes of this analysis, a difficult task
because these two areas of activity and expenditure are so
interrelated . Details of the rationale for the separation are
provided in Chapter III . Once the two areas of study were
separated, those businesses involved in recreation in the 19county coastal study area (Figure 17) were identified .
Since the terms of reference for this study were concerned
with contact sales of recreation products and services, it was
necessary to deal with sales or tax data . Therefore, after
identifying what was a part of recreation and what was a part
of tourism, the most recent Standard Industrial Classification
(SIC) Manual (Executive Office of the President, Office of
Management and Budget 1972) was consulted to ascertain which
SIC categories gave the most appropriate coverage of the
recreation industry . Many of the businesses and services
intuitively considered a part of recreation earlier did not
match SIC categories . Two sectors were chosen to represent
recreation as defined in this study . These sectors along with
their related SIC codes are shown in Table 16 . A listing in
Appendix E provides detailed information on the specific types
of recreation service businesses included in the miscellaneous
category, 799 . Several SIC categories include businesses,
other than recreation, that are of little or no consequence to
this study and tended to contaminate the data . However, the
only way to avoid the extraneous information was the
elimination of the category . For example, marinas are very
important to recreation but, unfortunately, are found with 19
other kinds of business in SIC category 4469 (including oil
spill clean-up, marine wrecking, and cargo salvaging) . Because
marinas cannot be segregated from the businesses in this
category, they were not included in the analysis . Also, in SIC
94
HARDIN 1
14 MUNTGOMER V
LIBERTY~ .~~`y
OHANGE
AZ
JEFFERSON
HARRIS
FORiEND~''~
~,
CHAMBERS
GALVESTON
ISUBREGION
"WHARTON
~
/
/
BFIAZORIA
%
"
.
\\
JACKSON
\~
~
~ ... .
-~ .
SUBREGION
MATAGORDA
VICTORIA
GOLAD
~~
.
~
~^
~.
(\`
CALHOUN
ee
JIM WELIS
SAN
.~
ARANSAS
~
~e,~~c
PATRICIO
X`
~
60
NUECES
SUBREGION 3
REFUGIO
. . . . . .,~
_
\-
----
r1 KLEBERG
~
r
:
I
~
I
KENEDY
\
'
1
t
~-----WILLACY
3 LEAGUE LINE
\
BROOKS
,. : :
SUBREGION 5
\
p
HIDALGU
CAMERON
'
Figure 17
TEXAS COASTAL COUNTIES STUDY AREA
95
Table 16
RECREATION SECTORS AND RELATED SIC CODES
Sector
50
57
Name
SIC
Code
Name
598
599
Misc . Retail
96
97
MILLION $
240
220
200
180
RETAIL
160
140
120
6 .5
6 .0
5 .5
5 .0
RECREATION
4 .5
0000~
4 .0
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 18
4250
3500
3250
3000
2750
2500
ETA
L.
2250
~ 2000
z
0
:5
1750
~ 1500
80
70
RECREATION
60
50
40
30
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 19
MILLION $
120
110
100
90
RETAIL
80
70
60
50
40
2 .2
2 .0
1 .8
1 .6
RECREATION
1 .4
1 .2
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 20
1 00
MILLION $
320
310
290
270
250
230
ETAI
210
190
170
150
7 .0
6 .5
6 .0
5 .5
RECREATION
5 .0
4 .5
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 21 ~
101
110
90
85
80
75
70
RETAI
65
60
60ZO 55
J
~ 50
45
2 .6
2 .2
2 .0
1'8
RECREATION
1 .6
1 .4
1 .2
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978 1979
Figure 22
4250
3250
3000
2750
2500
SUBREGION 2
2250
2000
1750
1500
~
Z
O_
1250
1000
300
250
SUBREGION 4
200
SUBREGION 1
150
SUBREGION 3
100
' 50
SUBREGION 5
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
Figure 23
103
104
II . BASELINE
ASSESSMENT
105
106
Figure 24
ORANGE
l
1
l_
JEFFERSON
HARRIS
/~
1 CHAMBERS
i /\~ J3 /
/
~
~
'
~~
.
GALVESTON
~
WHARTON
`
\
X
~\
J :.CKSON\
~
`
VICTORiA `~,
M
; _
REFUGIO--~~
AP,ANSA9
KLEBERG
ez~'
~/
Figure 25
ORANGE
\
JEFFERSON
HARR/S
/^~ \
l CHAMBERS ~ 1 q J
WHARTON
'~ NA
\~~
GALVESTON
~
BRAZORIA
lv~
JACKSON
//
~/
13
10
L,
\`~1ATAGORDA ~-1
VICTORIA
NA
CALHOUN
`RJE F U G I O
1
ARANSAS,5
.~~lY
SAN PATRICIO
.~
~~"
.~
~
NUECES
`~---
KENEDV
0
College
______
wILL
ACV
--~J
CAMERON
14
Figure 26
Figure 27
ORANGE
\
JEFFERSON
HARRIS
) CHA
ERS i
t GALVESTON
WHARTON
BRAZORIA
.
'~
/ ~ .~
. ~~
/.
.
JACKSON
1
'
\y
L`
MATAGORDA
`
VICTORIA `
I
/ A ~
CALHOUN ,
REFUGIO
lr:~ARANSAS
SANPATRICIO %
.\
NUECES
KLEBERG
KENEDY
__'~_
the
CAMERON
Party
Master
Boat
of
Industry on the
Texas Gulf Coast . Unpublished
Science thesis,
Department of Management, Texas
A &M University, College Station : 1977 .
Figure 28
Table 17
1968
Rank
1980
Rank
2000
7,300
15,700
Jefferson 646,000
2,743,300
33,500
5,905,200
Chambers 475,400
Harris 1,967,300
1,418,700
3,683,800
3,512,700
7,681,700
Orange
Rank
Galveston 11,839,100 1
23,262,500
2 48,491,200 1
Brazoria 2,926,900 3
6,297,000
3 14,490,800 3
Wharton NA
Matagorda 745,700
NA
1,838,900
NA
4,568,200
36,800
18,600
23,900
Victoria NA
Calhoun 779,400
NA
1,469,000
2,576,300
461,700
846,700
Jackson
Refugio 183,100
Aransas 2,618,100 4
San Patricio 2,298,600
Nueces 10,016,900 2
Kleberg 667,600
Kenedy
917,000
Willacy 335,500
Cameron 2,328,400 5
5,180,300
3,544,800
23,928,300
2,566,900
NA
5,410,900
1 47,850,300 2
5,318,100
2,977,500
571,000
4,760,700
9,385,600
6,189,300
785,800
7,482,200
Notes
1 . Totals include resident and non-resident participation occurrinq in rural areas . Boating, fishing, skiing, surfing,
swimming, picnicking, walking/hiking, and nature study data were included for resident and non-resident
participation occurring in urban areas . Boating, fishing, swimming, camping and picnicking data included
out-of-state participation occurring in rural areas .
2 . Data were drawn from the 1975 rather than 1980 Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan because the latter aggregated
county data into regions which did not coincide wi th the coastal subregions under study in the IXTOC I Impact
Assessment Report .
3 . NA was used to designate these counties in the study area for which no comparable data were available .
Source: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department . Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan- Outdoor Recreation on the Texas Gulf
Coast . Austin : Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ; 1975.
112
Table 18
TOP-RANKED ACTIVITIES FOR SELECTED COUNTIES
IN THE STUDY AREA
1980
1968
County Rank
Activity
Rank
2000
Activity
Rank Activity
Galveston 1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Picnicking
Boating
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Picnicking
Boating
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Boating
Picnicking
Nueces
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Picnicking
Camping
Boating
1
2
3
4
5
Swimming
Fishing
Picnicking
Camping
Walking
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Boating
Picnicking
Brazoria
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Picnicking
Boating
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Picnicking
Boating
1
2
3
4
5
Swimming
Fishing
Picnicking
Walking
Nature Study
Aransas
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Boating
Camping
Picnicking
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Boating
Picnicking
Camping
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Swimming
Surfing
Boating
Picnicking
Cameron
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Boating
Skiing
Camping
Swimming
1
2
3
4
5
Fishing
Boating
Skiing
Camping
Swimming
1
2
3
4
5
Swimming
Fishing
Boating
Picnicking
Camping
Source : Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. Texas Outdoor Recreation Plan-Outdoor Recreation on the Texas Gulf Coast .
Austin : Texas Parks and Wildlife Department ; 1975.
113
114
Table 19
RECREATION-RELATED EXPENDITURES BY SUBREGION, 1974
Sector
Subregion
1
Quarter
Recreation
1
2
3
$ 27,828,493
30,683,385
31,641,299
$ 1,014,021
1,194,965
1,199,706
34,607,221
1,054,512
124,760,398
4,463,204
2
3
4
Other
Retail
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Subregional
Total
$ 129,223,602
340,833,780
6,825,552
376,807,455
410,098,814
503,631,29 4
10,059,015
12,222,599
9,376,939
1,631,371,343
38,484,105
1,669,855,448
9,555,561
11,062,711
14,348,850
14,619,722
49,586,844
283,610
365,079
376,271
357,720
1,382,680
50,969,524
33,754,676
34,247,353
48,356,639
40,280,554
156,639,222
820,277
1,063,185
1,048,413
1,763,126
4,695,001
61,334,223
10,870,697
11,286,906
12,326,216
13,530,456
48,014,275
338,857
319,987
324,543
272,146
115
1,255,533
49,269,808
Table 20
Sector
Subregion
1
Subregional
Total
Quarter
Recreation
Other Retail
1
2
3
4
$ 39,079,253
31,625,552
31,628,300
41,868,466
144,201,571
$ 997,547
1,330,577
1,283,149
1,223,879
1
2
3
382,856,849
448,088,709
460,380,073
8,615,266
11,868,700
12,119,182
611,176,798
11,384, 169
1,902,502,429
43,987,317
14,143,020
15,835,984
15,353,549
20,0 48,838
312,834
438,802
435,106
401,564
65,381,391
1,588,306
66,969,697
44,452,414
40,886,427
45,912,257
71,807,234
203,058,332
1,034,502
1,200,829
1,276,844
1,270,611
4,782,786
207,841,118
14,576,594
12,883,824
14,222,475
17,903,651
59,586,544
413,257
364,947
341,870
360,997
1,481,070
61,067,614
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
116
4,835,152
$149,036,723
1,946,489,746
Table 21
Other Retail
Recreation
Subregional
Total
$ 42,510,075
43,435,536
41,873,513
50,583,075
178,402,199
$ 1,122,864
1,686,593
1,115,843
983,226
4,908,526
$ 183,310,725
502,971,173
12,042,302
521,246,201
13,882,819
3
4
554,699,907
715,507,220
2,294,424,501
15,957,584
13,666,551
55,549,256
17 ,823 ,140
29,130,391
18,591,414
22,569,368
440,664
583,527
377,748
424,327
88,114,313
1,826,266
89,940,579
48,555,716
50,641,349
48,717,183
58,510,006
216,424,254
1,166,821
1,407,012
1,387,976
1,181,418
5,143,227
-221,567,481
17,416,476
17,521,657
17,484,190
17,403,697
69,826,020
475,788
370,218
360,040
340,716
Quarter
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
117
1,546,762
2,349,973,757
71,372,782
Table 22
Quarter
Other Retail
Recreation
$ 41,482,773
$ 1,232,368
2
3
46,658,815
47,230,772
1,343,806
1,276,994
55,170,433
1,113,983
190,542,793
4,967,151
612,779,728
13,765,763
2
3
4
667,426,472
657,776,785
861,734,973
2,799,717,958
19,488,376
21,347,080
17,680,973
72,282,192
2,872,000,150
19,971,665
21,519,146
21,231,042
26,683,642
334,011
403,459
487,269
464,206
1,688,945
91,094,440
1
2
3
4
89,405,495
Sub regional
Total
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
$ 195,509,944
51,738,978
56,356,383
58,562,845
67,049,108
233,707,314
6,103,011
239,810,325
15,728,253
17,923,220
18,629,789
22,065,384
74,346,646
431,264
797,881
479,471
542,868
2,251,484
76,598,130
118
1,213,620
1,481,200
1,553,745
1,854,446
Table 23
RECREATION-RELATED EXPENDITURES BY SUBREGION, 1978
Sector
Subregion
1
Quarter
Other Retail
Recreation
1
2
3
4
$ 41,513,512
45,259,366
48,527,297
58,346,321
$ 1,160,402
1,384,852
1,335,538
1,319,118
5,199,910
193,646,496
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
729,921,845
528,550,689
836,888,601
977,704,149
Subregional
Total
$ 198,846,406
16,737,372
21,143,432
25,008,016
18,890,898
-~
3,073,065,284
81,779,718
3,154,845,002
21,033,223
22,746,412
24,501,419
30,749,231
99,030,285
474,503
338,215
599,445
533,452
1,945,615
100,975,900
60,738,065
66,479,832
68,553,658
78,320,814
274,092,369
1,307,209
1,680,403
1,815,085
2,135,849
6,938,546
281,030,915
18,409,292
20,018,963
21,467,294
23,611,339
83,506,888
531,633
482,899
547,235
564,999
2,126,766
85,633,654
119
Table 24
RECREATION EXPENDITUR E S BY SUBREGION, 1979
Other
Subregion
1
Quarter
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
Retail
Recreation
$ 48,805,058
46,335,888
56,961,622
73,612,836
$ 1,381,361
1,522,128
1,686,248
2,120,721
225,715,404
6,710,458
861,311,571
929,635,328
957,868,806
1,343,688,997
17,158,523
23,906,199
24,880,097
22,145,243
4,092,504,511 88,090,062
3
1
2
3
4
505,190
714,790
569,738
594,763
115,361,427
2,384,481
71,437,703
1,501,216
2
3
96,902,585
75,094,461
88,322,254
1,610,844
1,882,569
1,931,378
331,757,003
6,926,007
22,321,260
25,560,302
27,718,214
36,179,290
640,477
738,532
677,848
584,064
23,034,221
28,191,822
27,476,153
36,659,231
1
2
3
4
111,779,066 2,640,921
120
Table 25
ANNUAL TEXAS COASTAL RECREATION EXPENDITURES FOR 1974-1979
$ 46,261,639
1975
57,674,631
1976
68,974,037
1977
87,292,783
1978
97,990,555
106,751,929
1979
Table 26
ANNUAL TEXAS COASTAL OTHER RETAIL EXPENDITURES FOR 1974-1979
Year Actual Annual Expenditures
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
$ 2,010,372,082
2,374,730,267
2,847,191,287
3,387,720,206
3,723,341,322
1979
4,877,117,411
121
122
Table 27
Subregion
Category
ii
123
iii
IV
34
27
39
50
124
Table 28
Subregion
Category
Other
Retail
III
(%)
IV
.02
.3
.02
.5
125
126
Table 29
Subregion
Category
I
~
II
III
IV
0 835,205
0 1,026,053
1,129,082
0 17,978
0 36,452
53,846
853,183
1,062,505
1,182,928
Total ($)
127
128
129
600
550
1975
~
500
1976
1978
',``~~^~"' ~ 1979
450
~ ~ 1980
400
~~
350
300
X 250
.,~~ .
v)
w
V
200
~,
;
p 150 1,001,
cc
w
m
~ 100
50
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTH
Figure 29
Number of Vehicles Accessing Mustang-North Padre Island
by Means of the JFK Causeway and Port Aransas Ferry
(1975, 1976, 1978, 1979, 1980)
Source : Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation
130
1975
1976
1978
500
~
~ ~
1979
1980
~
450
4f
4f
400
~ I
350
w
V
300
.~
,
,.:~
,o
w
~
U-
250
i ac
m
~
200
: . . . . . . .. . . . . .
z
150
100
50
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
MONTH
Figure 30
Number of Vehicles Accessing South Padre Island
by Means of the Queen Isabella Causeway
(1975, 1976, 1978, 1979, 1980)
Source: Texas Department of Highways and Public Transportation
Note : Data for 1980 Missing ( 3 months) due to Hurricane Allen
131
and V, it would suggest that those who were likely to visit the
Gulf front communities in the late summer-early fall period
probably made recreation-related expenditures elsewhere in the
subregion . This is consistent with information known about
sum mer-fall Gulf coast visitors ; that is, they are more likely
to be regional Texans than out-of-state visitors (Fedler, 1978 ;
Bednarz, 1980 ;, Scogin 1980) .
Spill impact might have been more severe had the spill
occurred during the late winter-early spring on the South Texas
coast when there is an influx of out-of-state visitors or
winter Texans . If this group had been displaced or reduced,
the region and the state would have been deprived of their
expenditures entirely . This was not the case with the regional
Texas population who apparently spent their money for other
recreation-related services at home or elsewhere in each of the
affected subregions .
Visitation to the South Padre and North Padre areas appear
to have been affected by factors besides the IXTOC I oil spill .
For example, in the North Padre Island area, visitation for
1978 through 1980 was generally below 1975 and 1976 levels
(Figure 29) . Although this was not the case for visitation to
the South Padre Island area, there are few differences in
visitation between the latter halves of 1978 and 1979 (Figure
30) . Visitation here was generally well above 1975-1976
levels . In assessing impacts related to the spills, these
trends must be, and were, given full consideration .
NET IMPACT EFFECTS
Although net impacts are difficult to quantify, they can
be discussed in light of the business losses reported in Table
29 . In addition to the reported losses of businesses operating
at the water's edge (dry sand area and shorelands), other
losses were possibly incurred further inland in each of
Subregions II, IV, and V . However, it can be argued that these
were offset to some degree by the expenditures of those
involved in monitoring and cleaning up the spill or in
reporting on spill-related events for the news media . If a
trade-out of expenditures can be accepted at face value without
any supporting data, which are apparently lacking, then the
figures in Table 29 are the best available information . These
data appear intuitively reasonable from that which is'known
about the spills and their duration, with the highest and
lowest levels of impact (in percentages and in dollars) in
Subregions V and II, respectively . The estimates of impact are
based on information from personal interviews and, therefore,
can be regarded as conservative estimates of total impact . No
attempt has been made to generalize effects reported at the
water's edge to the entire subregion in an effort to produce a
large, albeit unsupportable, estimate of impact .
132
Negative Effects
It was concluded that three Gulf-front c o m m u n i t i e s
together suffered a direct economic loss of $3 .1 million in
recreation-related gross business receipts . As was seen in
Table 27, the estimates of lost business ranges from 34 to 50
percent in Gulf-front communities on the South Texas coast .
Approximately $2 .2 million of the total $3 .1 million loss in
gross receipts occurred in the cities of South Padre Island,
Port Isabel, and Port Aransas and was attributed to the IXTOC I
oil spill . The remaining $850 thousand loss in gross receipts
was incurred in the City of Galveston and was attributed to the
BURMAH AGATE spill .
Positive Effects
As shown previously in the Santa Barbara spill, the data
here suggest that the recreation business loss at the water's
edge was offset with additional recreation-related spending
elsewhere in the subregions . Figures 18 - 23 show other retail
and recreation expenditures for 1974-79 and generally indicate
an increasing trendline for 1979 (the spill period) . For
reasons of timing and the population affected, as discussed
earlier in the substitution section, the three affected
subregions (II, IV, and V) were not negatively impacted . By
this, it is meant that 1979 levels of gross receipts exceeded
1978 levels in every case (except for recreation business
receipts in Subregion IV which remained about the same) .
Even with cost of living increases and inflationary
effects considered, it is significant that there was no massive
decrease in regional gross receipts originally thought to
accompany the world's largest oil spill . In contrast to the
impacted Gulf front com munities, the subregions were not
impacted by the spill with the exception as noted previously .
If the subregions were not significantly affected by the two
oil spills, it is unlikely that the state or nation was
affected in any noticeable way .
THE ROLE OF THE MEDIA
As mentioned earlier, the role played by the media with
regard to oil spill impacts on the study area was a topic of
considerable controversy among nearly all who were interviewed .
Several persons suggested that the media coverage was biased
against the region in some premeditated way in an effort to
discredit a sunbelt area . Most, however, suggested that, if
the public had known the facts about the spill (i .e ., that the
oil did not come ashore until August 7, that oil spill clean-up
operations were in place to handle the oil, and that sport
fishing was apparently unaffected), they would have come to the
coast ; and the recreation-related impacts would not have been
so great . Interestingly, the recreation-related impacts proved
133
134
135
136
CHAPTER V
COMMERCIAL FISHING
- --
--;- '
-~c
. 11, f_
~-N
139
GENERAL PROCEDURES
The analysis is directed towards a conclusion regarding
the impact of the oil spills on the ex-vessel value of fish
(both finfish and shellfish) landed in Texas during the 3-year
study period 1979-1981 . The ex-vessel value is the primary
economic variable used to measure the output of the harvesting
level of the Texas commercial fishing industry and is the
product of the quantity of landings and the price per unit .
The effect of the oil spill would be expected to affect total
value through an impact on the quantity or volume landed .
Therefore, the analysis focuses primarily on an examination of
trends and variability in quantity landed . Economic
considerations, such as the possible reduction in value per
pound due to oil contamination or changes in operating costs,
are also examined .
Data for the analysis are of two basic types, secondary
and primary . Secondary data on landings, effort, and value
were obtained from published and unpublished sources collected
primarily by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and
the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD) and constitute
the generally accepted official data set for these variables .
General limitations of these data are discussed below, and
specific problems are noted as appropriate in the discussion of
the results .
Primary data were collected for this study through a
series of interviews completed either in person or by
telephone . The sample consisted of persons knowledgeable about
the Texas fishing industry, including fishermen, dockside
dealers, biologists, marine advisory agents, and local
businessmen . An extensive survey of this group was not
conducted as part of this study due to the lack of funding ;
however, these sources were considered important in developing
an overall view of the possible impacts . A limited sample,
therefore, of individuals, located in those areas of the
region most
likely
to be impacted were selected . The
information gained was used as a supplement to the analysis of
the secondary data set .
Data on shrimp landings, effort, and value are collected
through a system of NMFS port agents who regularly visit
dockside dealers and interview fishermen . Data on other
species are generally collected by TPWD through the use of a
regular reporting form submitted by first handlers, which
indicate quantity purchased and price by species .
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
A general question exists among users of the landings data
regarding the completeness of the data as incentives, and
opportunities for some under-reporting are always a concern .
140
ACTIVITY
141
142
Table 30
SHARE OF CUM .
TOTAL SHARE
IN METRIC TONS
1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 A V E R A G E
Aransas Pass/Rockport
Freeport
Brownsville
Port Isabel
4300 .7
3709 .6
2653 .3
2870 .3
5358 .1
4704 .7
N ueces Co . *
928 .6
Galveston Co .
Galveston
Port Arthur
Palacios
Port Lavaca
Seadrift
Seabrook
AI I Others* *
1395 .0
4607 .5
4431 .8
3587 .6
3132 .6
1324 .9
4009 .0
2030 .8
3197 .8
2783 .0
1396 .2
4124 .6
2815 .9
3010 .1
2697 .2
1509 .0
4480 .0
3538 .6
3264 .3
3038 .4
1310 .8
20 .1
15 .9
14 .6
13 .6
5 .9
20 .1
36 .0
50 .6
64 .2
70 .1
1231 .7
1225 .1
728 .7
582 .5
425 .7
1199 .0
1319 .6
698 .0
730 .7
673 .9
1488 .7
1120 .2
685 .5
676 .6
655 .1
1057 .3
684 .8
738 .9
931 .5
568 .5
1557 .1
730 .2
1029 .9
941 .8
569 .8
1306 .8
1016 .0
776 .2
772 .6
578 .6
5 .9
4 .6
3 .5
3 .5
2 .6
76 .0
80 .6
84 .1
87 .6
90 .2
278 .1
493 .6
1362 .3
492 .5
359 .2
1754 .4
386 .8
310 .7
1588 .7
477 .3
102 .8
1297 .4
500 .9
371 .6
1191 .3
427 .1
327 .6
1438 .8
1 .9
1 .5
6 .4
92 .1
93 .6
100 .0
20790 .2
26266 .6
23996 .7
19275 .3
21049 .4
22275 .8
3872 .6
3708 .9
-A
ta
Total
*Nueces County landings are mostly at the port of Aransas . The county line runs through the
port area .
**Incl udes Port O' Connor, Port Mansfield, Anahuac, Matagorda & Riviera
SOURCE : Unpublished NMFS data
Table 31
VALUE OF SHRIMP LANDINGS BY PORT, TEXAS 1976-1980
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
Average
(000 Dollars)
Aransas Pass/Rockport
Freeport
Brownsville
Port Isabel
N u eces Co . *
~
~
$ 27713 .4
21916 .9
16380 .4
17908 .1
5041 .7
Cum.
Share
22 .7
22 .7
39 .3
55 .9
70 .6
76 .1
$ 28430 .4
24333 .5
20568 .7
18336 .5
6427 .9
$ 30751 .5
28316 .7
23314 .8
19025 .3
7019 .9
$ 36188 .1
17968 .4
29704 .3
24473 .8
9696 .4
$ 31139 .3
20672 .0
22781 .7
20035 .7
9264 .7
$ 30844 .5
22641 .5
22550 .0
4762 .8
5752 .5
7362 .3
6184 .1
6674 .3
8149 .3
4 .8
4719 .9
5065 .8
6063 .8
6508 .5
5691 .3
3913 .1
4464 .7
4 .2
2 .9
3 .3
80 .9
85 .1
88 .0
91 .3
3306 .1
2882 .3
2 .1
93 .4
1840 .8
1556 .3
5864 .6
1219 .0
1205 .0
0 .9
0 .9
4 .8
94 .3
95 .2
100.0
Galveston Co .
Galveston
Port Arthur
5593 .8
6286 .6
3617 .3
Palacios
Port Lavaca
3265 .0
2172 .4
3166 .3
3501 .4
2678 .7
2910 .9
3887 .4
3049 .2
5513 .3
4805 .1
5605 .8
3204 .9
Seadrift
Seabrook
AllOthers"*
620 .9
1515 .7
6092 .1
1096 .0
1240 .2
6597 .4
859 .1
1269 .1
7160 .6
1678 .2
443.8
7049.2
$153005 .e
TOTAL
Share of
Total
19955 .9
7490 .1
6552 .8
$ 140460 .0 $ 135918 .6
*Nueces County landings are mostly at the port of Aransas . The county line runs through the port area .
*"Includes Port O'Connor, Port Mansfield, Anahuac, Matagorda and Riviera
Source : Unpublished NMFS data .
16 .6
16 .6
14 .7
5 .5
RTHUR ($3 .9 m)
m)
KLI
Figure 31
Commercial Fishing Activities in Texas as Indicated
by Annual Average Value of Shrimp Landings by Port,
1976-1980
145
146
Table 32
Value of
Fish as Percent
of Agr . Receipts
%
1970
1971
1972
$ 288196
324370
366969
$ 53243 .6
69776 .7
84987 .8
18 .5
21 .5
23 .5
1973
561933
91479 .1
16 .3
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979*
582116
546421
586400
604444
720960
813895
71791 .6
92659 .5
127056 .4
134135 .9
147989 .6
158952 .0
12 .3
17 .0
21 .7
22 .2
20 .5
19 .5
* Preliminary
Source : Texas County Agriculture statistics, Texas Landings, annual summary
and Texas Commercial Harvest statistics, 1978 - 1979 .
147
Table 33
LANDINGS AND VALUE OF LANDINGS . UNITED STATES AND TEXAS
1970-1980
V ALUE
TOTAL LANDINGS
YEAR
TEXAS
.*
TEXAS**
SHARE
OF U .S .
U .S
(METRIC TONS) %
1970
1971
1972
~
~
1973
1974
1975
2276149 .8
2179987 .3
2203574 .3
51710 .1
60782 .0
35380 .5
30844 .6
2253016 .4
2212192 .7
29483 .8
27215 .8
1976
1977
2443980 .7
2357797 .3
1978
1979* **
2734282 .8
2842692 .5
29937 .4
33566 .2
30391 .0
1980***
2940215 .9
25855 .0
2 .7
1 .6
1 .4
1 .3
TEXAS
U .S .* TEXAS** SHARE OF U .S.
%
MILL IONS OF DOLLARS
$ 651
748
937
932
977
$ 53
70
85
91
72
1 .2
1 .2
1349
93
127
1 .4
1 .1
1515
1854
134
148
0 .9
2234
159
2237
10 .7
11 .4
9 .7
7 .7
9 .5
9 .4
88
8 .0
7 .1
Figure 32
Value of Landings, Commercial Fisheries,
United States and Texas, 1971-1979 .
I10
2000
UNITED STATES
vo 1500
to
-L
o
E
,I
J 1000
~I
>
~
~ twoo
500
TEXAS
1978 1979
Overview
of
Important Species
150
Table 34
Year
Shrimp
(Heads off)
Total
Shellfish
Finfish
Total
All Fish
METRIC TONS
.,
N
~
Shrimp
in Share
of Total
%
1970
25128 .8
29760 .0
21954 .4*
1971
1972
24383 .3
27716 .0
29174 .9
32435 .3
31604 .4*
3064.4
1973
1974
23322 .0
22398 .1
27510 .7
25730 .3
3299.0
35499 .7
30809 .8
1975
1976
20080 .0
21262 .7
23597 .2
26057 .0
3611 .5
3459.8
29341 .8
27057 .0
75 .7
76 .3
74 .2
1977
1978
26278.2
23995 .3
31205 .6
28255 .5
3673 .0
2401 .3
2352 .1
29730 .5
33607 .0
71 .5
78 .2
1979**
19439 .0
23640 .7
2062 .6
30607 .6
25703 .4
78 .4
75 .6
51714 .4
60779 .3
48 .6
40 .1
78 .1
' In 1970-1971 very large quantities of menhaden were landed in Texas . Since 1972 this has been insignificant .
" Preliminary
Table 35
VALUE OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES LANDINGS (EX-VESSEL) FOR
SHRIMP, TOTAL SHELLFISH, FINFISH AND ALL FISH 1970-1979, TEXAS
SHRIMP AS
TOTAL TOTAL ALL SHARE OF
SHRIMP SHELLFISH FINFISH FISH TOTAL
(000
-4
N
N
1970
1971
$ 48613 .5
64191 .1
$ 51163 .8
67147 .7
1972
1973
80098 .7
86879 .5
67679 .1
83259 .3
89523 .3
69629 .9
90243 .4
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979*
87902 .3
11981 .0
126858 .3
141111 .0
153005 .7
124165 .1
131796 .8
145324 .4
156268 .2
DOLLARS)
$ 2079 .7
2629 .0
1728 .5
1955 .8
2161 .7
2415 .9
2891 .3
2339 .1
2665 .2
2660 .5
$ 53243 .5
69776 .7
84987 .8
91479 .1
71791 .6
92659 .4
127056 .4
134135 .9
147989 .6
158928 .7
'Preliminary
Source : Texas Landings, Annual Summary, 1970-1978 and Texas Commercial Harvest Statistics
1978-1980 (Preliminary)
91 .3
92 .0
94 .2
95 .0
94 .3
94 .9
94 .4
94 .6
95 .4
96 .3
Table 36
COMMERCIAL LANDINGS OF SHELLFISH IN TEXAS, 1965, 1970-1979
Shrimp (Headsoff)
Brown &
Pink
Total
White Other Shrimp
Crab
Oysters
(Meats)
1643 .0
2193 .3
10 .8
25731 .4
Squid
Total
(Metric Tons)
1965
17664.4
4191 .2
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
19510.8
20214 .6
22543.1
16247 .8
16769.0
5617 .3
.8
4150 .4 18.3
5165 .9 7 .0
6778 .9 295.3
5219 .1 410.1
25128 .9
24383 .3
27716 .0
23322 .1
22398 .2
2506 .3
2635 .3
2932 .2
3121 .2
2761 .3
21204
2152 .0
1784 .6
1065 .0
564 .1
4 .4
4 .3
2 .4
2 .4
6.8
297600
29174 .8
32435 .2
27510.7
25730.4
Average 1970-74
19057 .1
2791 .3
1537 .2
4 .1
28922.3
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
15560 .6
16581 .5
20483 .9
17619.2
14335 .8
4306 .7
4570 .0
5720 .1
6334 .6
4901 .8
212.7
104.2
74.3
41 .5
201 .4
20080 .0
21262 .7
26278.3
23995 .3
19439.0
2717 .7
3024 .8
3741 .5
3388 .2
3770 .1
796.5
1760 .3
1179 .6
865 .0
431 .6
2 .9
9 .3
6.3
7 .0
0 .4
23597 .1
26057 .1
31205 .7
28255 .5
23640 .8
16916.2
5168 .0
126.8
22211 .0
3328 .4
1006 .6
5 .1
26555 .3
(63.7)
(19 .5)
(0 .5)
(83 .6)
(12.5)
(3 .8)
(0 .0)
(100 .0)"
Average 1975-1979
Share of Total Shellfish (%)
28.7 21884 .3
' Preliminary
" Does not add due to rounding
Source : Texas Landings, Annual Summary, 1970 - 1978 and Texas Commercial Harvest Statistics 1978 - 79, 1979 - 80 (Preliminary)
Table 37
VALUE OF COMMERCIAL LANDINGS OF SHELLFISH IN TEXAS 1965,
1970-1979
SHRIMP
Brown
& Pink
White
Other
Total
Shrimp*
Crabs
Oysters
(Meat)
Squid
Total
Shellfish*
31240 .7
286 .0
1538 .5
2 .4
33067 .6
48613 .2
508 .7
567 .2
2040 .7
2387 .9
2507 .2
1812 .6
0 .9
1 .5
0 .8
51163 .5
67147 .8
83259 .4
89523 .2
(000 Dollars)
-4
it
1965
25539 .8
5692 .8
1970
38406 .7
10206 .5
1971
1972
53129 .7
64873 .6
11055 .9
15219 .0
5 .6
6 .2
64191 .2
80098 .8
1973
1974
63571 .8
51249 .3
23034 .6
16094 .2
273 .0
335 .5
86879 .4
652 .6
830 .4
67679 .0
832 .4
1115 .8
54246 .2
71586 .5
15122 .0
16161 .7
124 .1
154 .1
69492 .3
23406 .2
24627 .2
38922 .5
68 .5
235 .2
1972 .8
1392 .0
3100 .2
2991 .7
1 .3
1 .4
96406 .3
101995 .9
102155 .8
87902 .3
119881 .0
126858 .3
678 .3
947 .7
1179 .3
1946 .7
117711 .6
34895 .1
32 .7
399 .0
141111 .0
153005 .7
2003 .8
2146 .1
2205 .6
1116 .1
4 .4
0 .3
97971 .2
27602 .5
177 .9
1644 .7
2161 .1
3 .0
113980 .3
25867 .7
432 .0
125751 .6
140280 .1
Average
1970-1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979**
Average
1975-1979
1980**
8 .1
0 .8
2 .7
4 .6
4 .1
Texas Land ings Annual Summary, 1965, 1 970-1978 and Texas Commercial
Harvest Sta tistics, 1978 -1979 .
69629 .9
72144 .7
90243 .4
124165 .1
131800 .8
145324 .8
156268 .2
129560 .4
Table 38
LANDINGS OF MAJOR FINFISH SPECIES, TEXAS 1965 and 1970-79
Spotted
Croaker
Black
Drum
Red Drum
(Red fish)
Flounders
Groupers
Sea Sh eepshead
Trout
Red
Snapper
All
Other
Menhaden
Bait &
Food
Fish
Animal
Food"
Total
Finfish
(Metric Tons)
1965
.4
666 .9
241 .6
132 .7
61 .2
533 .5
87 .8
1003 .3
348 .0
28091 .9
31167.3
1970
1974
48 .6
24 .8
26.4
55 .6
78.0
355 .0
516 .4
528 .4
547 .9
615 .4
719 .5
903 .0
665 .8
760 .9
871 .6
134 .8
144 .7
205 .8
155 .1
230 .0
26 .9
62 .41
44 .2
45 .5
38.6
524.7
674.7
680.1
893 .1
905 .4
79.6
60.6
107 .7
122 .2
167 .7
415 .7
491 .0
561 .6
354.4
337 .0
105 .7
158 .8
183 .0
214 .3
226 .3
19543 .9
28568 .1
61 .4
150.0
141 .5
21954 .5
31604 .4
3064 .4
3299 .0
3611 .5
Average (1970-74)
46.7
512 .6
784 .2
174 .1
43.5
735.6
107 .6
431 .9
177 .6
9692 .9
12706 .8
1979*
52 .6
51 .3
13 .9
13 .5
9 .1
779.1
948 .2
659.3
810.3
694 .2
961 .8
920 .5
431 .3
392 .3
311 .7
223 .4
198 .2
141 .0
109.9
105 .4
32 .4
31 .4
10 .0
15 .8
6 .5
823 .0
802 .2
610 .9
528 .4
467 .3
144 .6
171 .9
133 .3
149 .7
184 .2
284 .6
224 .6
199 .6
171 .1
97 .4
52 .0
238 .2
117 .9
121 .0
138 .2
106.3
86 .8
83 .2
39 .8
48.7
3459 .9
3673 .5
2401 .3
2351 .9
2062 .7
Average (1975-79)
28 .3
778.2
603 .5
155 .6
19 .2
646 .4
156 .8
195 .4
133 .5
72 .9
2789 .9
1971
1972
1973
~
N
N
1975
1976
1977
1978
* Preliminary
"Includes Menhaden beginning in 1970 NMFS
Source : Texas Landings 1965, 1970-78 and Texas Commercial Harvest Statistics 1978-79, TP&WD
Table 39
CROAKER
BLACK
DRUM
RED DRUM
(RED FISH)
SPOTTED
FLOUNDERS
GROUPERS
SEA TROUT
SHEEPSHEAD
RED
SNAPPER
BAIT &
ALL OTHER
FOOD FISH
ANIMAL
FOOD'
TOTAL
FINFISH'
(Dollars)
~
~71
01
1965
$ 56
$ 136039
$ 137872
1970
6113
83854
349903
$ 72783 $
13459
$ 320859
$ 16984
$ 628137
$ 43008
$ 1124295
$ 2493522
64844
5617
256583
14647
379923
14544
903649
2079677
21785
1051919
2629046
1971
2942
116800
484326
75603
13459
357363
9722
495127
1972
3414
135384
408799
119735
10729
420068
19634
571984
33113
5629
1728479
41218
20399
1955847
1973
8859
154350
539316
105275
14498
645900
24500
401532
1974
11324
221396
614094
149081
10950
645124
26497
415792
49071
18377
2161706
(1970-74)
6530
142357
479288
102908
11051
465008
19000
452875
31946
399995
2110951
1975
11185
207772
795253
176032
11212
701095
27246
393442
77728
14949
2415914
1976
11533
508810
887991
181177
13019
796660
41323
353157
83000
14619
2891289
1977
3956
399800
511536
170836
5154
723176
28813
420875
51258
23748
2339152
1978
3747
607767
596477
174307
8432
771420
39335
391695
64363
9677
2665220
7605
431037
697814
175588
9454
748088
34179
389792
69087
15748
2557894
Average
Average
(1975-78)
communities,
is a relatively small
157
Table 40
Fishermen
on Boats
Fishermen
on Vessels
Year
Full
time
Part
time
Total
1965
1970
1971
4504
5183
5852
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
Gulf-wide
1976
Texas as
share of gulf
1976 %
5303
12
5747
6758
5704
5009
5315
14,928
219
15,147
Full
time
Part
time
937
769
393
735
754
646
669
624
936
960
7979
470
488
395
259
520
1706
1128
1224
Total
6210
6311
294
1134
1064
883
1456
1254
7076
6881
7822
6587
6465
6569
4942
12921
28068
(9 .7)
(23 .4)
(35 .1)
158
Total
Table 41
Boats*'
Total
Total
1965
1371
845
2216
1499
1264
2763
1970
1971
1723
1931
420
506
2686
2937
1900
2294
438
430
1819
2046
2047
867
891
1972
1973
1974
2143
2437
2338
387
844
2436
2082
2833
3209
2006
1758
2724
2393
2602
786
773
1828
688
2516
716
1338
1055
2798
3161
2978
1850
700
2550
1975
1976
1980"'
1823
1923
159
vessels in
only about
percent of
Gulf, were
160
Table 42
Year*
~
~
General
Commercial
Fishe rmen
Commercial
Fishing
Boat
Gu lf
Bay
3995 1265
1365
3974
S hrimp Boat**
1971
36498
1330
3341
1972
1973
1974
38007
32121
27289
1336
1482
1277
26651
27134
28653
30644*'**'
1336
1601
1386
3368
3202
2764
2573
1975
1976
1977
1978****
1979****
23958
1726
1530
2881
3173
3364
3308
B ait
3616 1570
3523 1404
2917 1406
3232 1449
3768 1521
4444
1752
4473 2016
Total***
8601
8707
8288
7691
6896
7562
8462
9560
9797
162
Table 43
Average Total
Year and Number of Wages
Quarter
Emp loyees Paid
(000 Dollars)
Quarterly wages
Paid per
Covered
Employee
(Dollars)
1978
1
1576
2
3
1570
2109
4*
2015
1
2
3
4
1744
1866
2177
$ 3742 .5
3586 .9
8940 .8
9881 .2
$ 2375
2285
4239
4904
1979
2128
1994
5210 .3
6757 .9
9683 .2
9928 .0
2988
3622
4448
4665
1980
1
2
1309
1288
3116.6
2558 .1
2381
1986
163
164
Table 44
EFFORT IN THE SHRIMP FISHERY AS EXPRESSED BY DAYS FISHED FROM
TEXAS PORTS, BY SPECIES 1970-1979 .
Days Fished
Brown
Shrimp
White
Shrimp
All
Others
55905
70088
22031
19693
1945
61222
28697
861
870
1973
52482
39697
3475
95654
1974
51640
26150
1560
79350
Average 1970-74
58267
27254
1742
87263
1976
1977
1978
1979
49846
65980
69150
69774
62748
23063
27660
30149
34374
23344
1488
2060
1471
538
1407
74397
95700
100770
104686
87499
Average 1975-79
63500
27718
1393
Year
1970
1971
1972
1975**
Total
79881
90642
90789
92610***
165
Table 45
Year
1975
1976
1977
568
757
776
31
47
48
5 .5
6 .2
6 .2
166
Table 46
A
TOTAL
LABOR AND
PROPRIETOR'S
YEAR
INCOME
B
PERSONAL
INCOME FOR
FORESTRY,
FISHERIES AND
SHARE
OTHER
B IS OF A
(million dollars)
1975
52,637
31
.058
1976
60,252
47
.078
1977
68,144
48
.074
167
III . IMPACT
ASSESSMENT
an
in
no
or
INTERVIEWS
Information was sought from interviewees in two general
areas : (1) biological relationships thought to be important
and (2) direct evidence regarding effects on quantity or
quality of seafood landed . The scientific literature and
fishery biologists were the main sources regarding the current
168
169
of Interview Evidence
170
TRENDS IN LANDINGS
The primary effect, if any, would expectedly be expressed
through a change in commercial fish landings by Texas
fishermen . Therefore, the focus in the following discussion is
on landings data rather than value . The effect on landings
then can be translated to value using the appropriate prices
and assumptions regarding price flexibilities at the ex-vessel
level of the industry .
Data on landings for all important species were presented
in Tables 36 and 38 in the preceding section . The period 19701978 just preceding the study period is examined in terms of
the historical variation in landings for important species
including shrimp, crabs, oysters, and finfish (Table 47) .
Oysters, the most variable, show a standard deviation greater
than 40 per cent of the annual mean landings . Crabs exhibit a
more consistent series with a coefficient of variation of less
than 15 per cent . Total shrimp shows a relatively low
coefficient of variations, but when disaggregated, more
variability is noted . White shrimp landings have been
relatively more variable than those for brown and pink
combined .
Quarterly landings of each of the important series are
presented in Table 48 . These data show the seasonal variation
that occurs for each species . As discussed earlier, the
sources of this seasonal and annual variation are both
biological and economic . Obviously, the seasonal effect is
primarily biological and tracks the natural cycle of each
species . Year-to-year variation is also greatly affected by
natural factors . In modeling such a system, environmental
conditions would be a major factor along with economic
variables influencing dockside prices, profitability, and
fishing effort . Using such a model, combined with estimates of
the values for the independent variables, would enable a
projection of the landings for each species through the study
period .
As discussed above, the current level of knowledge
regarding the important biological and environmental
relationships preclude using a model as a helpful approach .
Data on the potential independent variables are generally not
available for recent periods, which means that projections of
the dependent variables would be based on projections of the
independent variables, .thus failing to account for the known
variability in these factors .
The annual data series were subjected to simple time trend
analysis, which were estimated for the years 1970-1978 and
projected through the study period, 1979-1981 . Confidence
intervals (95 per cent) were also estimated in association with
the projected annual landings . This approach is relatively
171
Table 47
MEAN, RANGE AND STANDARD DEVIATION FOR TEXAS SHELLFISH AND FINFISH
ANNUAL LANDINGS
1970-1978
Coefficient
1970-1978
Mean
Range
Standard
Deviation
Low High
of
1979
Variation Landings
%
Metric Tons
Metric Tons
-A
V
N
Brown Shrimp*
White Shrimp*
Total Shrimp*
Crabs
Oysters (meats)
Finfish**
18392 .3
5318 .9
23840 .5
2981 .0
1365 .3
3035 .7
* Heads-off Weight
**Excludes Menhaden
15560 .6
4150 .4
20080 .0
2506 .30
564 .1
2352 .6
22543 .1
6778 .9
27716 .0
3741 .5
1784 .6
3673 .5
2379 .8
893 .5
2399 .9
392 .2
598 .0
528 .3
12 .9
16 .8
10 .1
13 .2
43 .8
17 .4
14335 .8
4901 .8
19439 .0
3770 .1
431 .6
2062 .7
Table 48
Quarterly Reported Commercial Landings for Selected Shellfish Species,
Totaled Shellfish, Finfish and all Fish, Texas 1970-1980
SHRIMP
(HEADS OFF)
BROWN
&
PINK
WHITE
OTHER
TOTAL
CRABS
OYSTERS
(MEAT)
TOTAL
SHELLFISH
FINFISH
TOTAL
ALL FISH
(Metric Tons)
1970
1
2
3
4
Total
-L
-1
G)
2115 .4
2751 .5
9756.3
4887 .7
290.0
1244 .4
1980.2
2102.6
19510 .9
5617.3
347 .8
769 .9
0 .1
.6
2405 .4
3995 .9
11736 .6
6991 .0
226.7
602.5
936.9
740 .0
1052 .5
198 .2
33 .9
835 .8
3684 .9
4797 .0
12710.6
8567 .4
655.4
5887 .9
14424 .3
986 .8
4340.3
10684.9
271 .34 .9
9554 .3
.7
25128 .9
2506 .3
2120 .4
29760.0
21954.5
51714 .5
2450 .2
2882 .2
352 .8
856 .2
1082 .1
275 .3
3885 .9
4016 .5
793 .5
14505 .2
4678 .8
18521 .6
1971
2
1
2
2102 .4
2112 .2
10760 .7
787 .3
11548 .0
842.8
58 .7
12450 .3
10925.8
27912 .1
5239 .3
2245 .3
18 .3
7509 .0
583 .4
735 .9
8822 .8
844 .0
9666.8
20214 .6
4150 .4
18 .3
24383 .4
2635 .2
2152.0
29174 .4
31604 .4
60779 .3
Total
1972
2
3
1
2
3
2278 .6
3741 .3
12157 .3
720.4
1245.8
1351 .6
3 .2
2999 .1
4990.3
13508 .8
435 .0
1025.8
970 .2
754.6
111 .7
46 .6
4188 .9
6129 .2
14526 .2
783 .5
746.3
760 .1
4972 .5
6875 .5
15286.3
4365 .9
1848.0
3 .8
6217.7
501 .4
871 .7
7591 .0
774 .4
8365 .4
27716 .0
2932 .2
1784 .6
32435 .3
3064 .4
35499 .7
22543.1
Total
1973
1907 .2
3784 .1
7432 .7
434 .6
616 .3
2129 .3
1 .2
2250 .9
4401 .7
9562 .0
387 .4
969 .4
1017 .4
621 .7
74 .6
49 .6
3260 .0
5446 .9
10629 .7
730.0
970.5
785.0
3990 .0
6417 .4
11414 .7
3123 .7
3689 .7
294 .2
7107 .5
747 .1
319 .2
8174 .2
813.5
8987 .7
1
2
3
4
Total
1975
Total
7 .0
1
2
3
Total
1974
5165 .9
1
2
3
4
16247 .8
6779 .0
295 .3
23322 .1
3121 .2
1065 .0
27510 .8
3299 .0
30809 .0
1826 .3
2332 .3
8839 .2
3771 .2
848.3
1039.1
1228.2
2103.5
132 .4
5.6
1 .6
89.0
2988 .4
3377 .0
10069 .0
5963 .7
432 .4
945 .3
845 .1
538 .6
177 .4
54.4
38.4
293 .9
3600 .6
4379 .1
10953 .9
8157 .5
997 .9
821 .5
878 .0
914 .1
4598 .6
5200 .6
11831 .9
7710 .8
16769.0
5219 .1
410 .1
22398.1
2761 .3
564 .1
25730 .3
3611 .5
29341 .9
1108 .5
2849 .7
7272 .9
3876 .0
482 .8
884 .7
748 .3
2190 .9
16 .6
0 .4
0.6
195.1
2061 .4
3734 .7
8021 .8
6262 .1
443 .8
756.4
802 .4
715 .1
382 .9
95 .3
48 .2
270 .2
2888 .6
4586 .8
8873 .6
7248 .2
818.7
739.3
977 .5
924 .4
3707 .3
5326 .1
9851 .1
8172 .6
15560 .6
4306 .7
212 .7
20080 .0
2717 .8
796 .5
23597 .2
3459 .9
27057 .1
Table 48
Quarterly Reported Commercial Landings for Selected Shellfish Species,
Totaled Shellfish, Finfish and all Fish, Texas 1970-1980 (Continued)
(Metric Tons)
1976
1
2
3
4
Total
~
1977
1
2
3
4
V
A
Total
1978
1
2
3
4
Total
1979
1
2
3
4
Total
1980
1
2
1584 .3
2793 .6
8848 .9
3354 .8
513.5
906.4
1612 .3
1544 .7
64 .4
4 .3
1 .3
34 .3
2162 .2
3704 .2
10462 .5
4933 .8
598 .8
909 .8
936 .4
579 .8
616 .9
190 .1
140 .3
812 .8
3379.0
4811 .1
11540 .1
6326 .7
834.0
858.4
1035.5
942.7
16581 .5
4577 .0
104 .2
21262 .7
3025 .0
1760 .3
26056.9
3673.5 29730 .5
917 .1
3022 .5
12025 .6
4518 .9
139 .2
303 .0
2337 .9
2939 .9
3 .3
37 .8
33 .2
1059 .6
3363 .3
14363 .5
7492 .0
366 .8
1137 .8
1264 .1
972 .7
605 .5
188 .3
94 .7
291 .0
2032 .1
4690 .7
15725.8
8757 .0
20483 .9
5720 .1
74 .3
26278 .3
3741 .5
1179 .6
31205 .7
1788 .1
3315 .0
9094 .0
3422 .3
411 .8
515 .8
2039 .0
3367 .9
0 .7
0 .5
40 .3
2200.6
3831 . 4
11133.0
6830 .3
485 .5
1079 .1
1080 .7
742 .8
556 .51
121 .8
60 .0
126 .7
811 .1
451 .5
458 .6
630 .7
17619 .2
6334 .6
41 .5
23995.3
3388 .2
865 .0
2352 .6
1581 .4
3871 .6
5928 .6
2954 .3
232 .9
479 .6
1583 .7
2605 .6
5 .6
1 .0
.04
194 .9
1819 .8
4352 .1
7512 .3
5754 .7
249 .2
1094 .4
1375 .6
1050 .9
334 .3
62 .6
34 .7
767 .8
484 .0
334 .09
476 .8
14335 .8
4901 .8
201 .4
19439 .0
3770 .1
431 .6
2062 .7
2062 .7 25707 .0
839 .6
2627 .4
240.5
365 .2
83 .3
3 .6
1163 .4
2996 .2
794 .7
1268 .8
337 .6
120 .4
529 .6
467 .1
529.6 2825 .3
467 .1 4852 .5
787.6
576.6
485 .6
551 .5
4215 .9
5669 .6
12575 .6
7269 .4
2819 .7
5267 .3
16211 .4
9308 .5
2401 .4 33607 .0
811 .8
451 .5
458 .6
630 .7
4054 .4
5486 .7
12735 .1
8331 .9
2352 .6 30608 .1
767 .8
484 .0
333 .9
476 .8
3171 .2
5994 .6
9223.9
7317 .2
175
Table 49
ACTUAL AND PREDICTED VALUES AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR TEXAS
COMMERCIAL LANDINGS OF SELECTED SPECIES USING STRAIGHT LINE
TRENDS, 1979-1981
Predi cted
Species and
Year
Mean
Value
Actual
Landings
(Metric Tons)
Crabs
1979
1980
1981
3533
3643
3754
3075
3112
3147
3992
4176
4362
3770
1979
1980
1981
677
540
402
- 176
- 450
- 728
1530
1530
1533
432
1979
1980
2968
2955
2942
3936
4078
4225
2063
1981
2000
1832
1658
1979
1980
1981
22590
22341
22091
18367
17437
16490
26815
27244
27697
19439
16778
16456
16133
12721
11745
10753
20836
21165
21512
14336
White Shrimp"
1979
1980
1981
5646
5712
5777
4039
'3846
3646
7254
7578
7908
4902
Oysters
Finfish*
"
Total Shrimp* *
*Excludes Menhaden
"Trend lines not significant at 10 percent level
176
jumped
cents a
dramatically
during 1979
litre) in January to 86
on
Fishing
Activity
177
Table 50
Predicted
Year &
Mean
Value
Quarter
Actual
Landings*
(Metric Tons)
1979
1
2
3
4
1974
3496
10844
6276
891
2414
9761
5194
3057
4579
11926
7359
1820 .0
4352 .1
7512 .3
5755 .0
1980
1 1911
2 3434
3 10781
4 6214
719
2242
9589
5022
3104
4626
11974
7406
1163 .4
2996 .2
1981
1 1849
2 3372
3 10718
4 6152
539
2061
9409
4841
3159
4682
12029
7462
178
Table 51
25128 .9
24383 .4
27716 .0
23322 .1
22398 .1
20080 .0
21262 .7
26278 .3
23995 .3
19439 .0
79,881
90,642
90,789
95,654
79,350
74,397
95,700
100,770
104,686
87,499
179
.315
.269
.305
.244
.282
.270
.222
.261
.229
.222
on Employment
There
commercial
short term
measurable
that there
Effect
on
Personal Income
Substitution Effect
Since direct effects were not measurable, it is concluded
that there were no substitution effects resulting from the oil
spills' impacts on commercial fishing .
Net Impacts
Positive Impacts : There were no documented positive
impacts of the oil spills on the commercial fishing industry of
Texas .
Negative Impacts : Although there are no quantifiable
negative impacts on the fishing industry, several negative
considerations should be noted .
1 . The disruption of fishing fleet operations represents a
negative impact, although the level of this disruption
in the cases studied here was not large enough to have
180
a measurable
industry-wide impact .
No indirect
economic
the
evidence
was
sector,
since no measurable
Commercial Fishing
found that would support t he case of a direct impact as a
impacts,
by
result of the oil
spills .
Indirect economic
The
definition, are a function of direct economic impact .
no indirect
absence of any direct eco nomic impact means
economic impact .
IV . SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
In terms of potential economic impacts, the most important
consideration for Texas is the shrimp fishery, which represents
over 95 percent of the value of landings . Evidence does not
exist that indicates the oil spills affected the biological
activity of shrimp or other important commercial species .
Analysis is still underway that may reveal some evidence of
potential long-term significance, but to date there is no
biological basis for projecting a significant negative impact
on commercial landings .
Information gathered from industry participants and
knowledgeable observers indicates that no measurable impacts
occurred on landings or value of landings . While some small
impact on fishing patterns was suggested, it was not
significant in terms of measurable industry-level effects .
Analysis of secondary data relating to commercial landings
supports the direct observations obtained . Data for the study
181
182
CHAPTER VI
MEDIA COVERAGE
lvi
Chicago Tribune
Christian Science Monitor
6/79
6/79
to
to
12/80
12/80
Houston Post
London Times
Los Angeles Times
New Orleans Times-Picayune
1/80
6/79
6/79
6/79
to
to
to
to
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/79
6/79
6/79
to
to
9/80
12/80
Washington Post
4/80
to
5/80
6/79 to 12/80
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
6/79
Report
185
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
12/80
(CBS)
(ABC)
(NBC)
Cumulative indexes for 1980 were not available for the New
York Times and Washington Post . In addition, the January 1980
through March 1980 indexes for the Washington Post were not
available . Monthly indexes to the New York Times from January
1980 through September 1980 were searched with the last
reference to a relevant article being in June 1980 . For the
W ashington Post , the April 1980 index contained the last
reference to an article that was concerned with either the
BURMAH AGATE sinking or the IXTOC I oil well blowout .
The televised news coverage was obtained from Broadcast
News Company in Houston, a firm that specializes in the videorecording of news events . The majority of the televised
coverage was limited to the period when the oil affected the
Texas coast .
To obtain a comprehensive coverage of the references to
the information, several categories or headings in each of the
indexes were used in conducting the search . There was some
overlap, with references appearing under more than one heading .
The list of the reference headings that were used in the search
and references under which the articles on the IXTOC I or
BURMAH AGATE incidents appeared are :
Accidents Petroleum Environmental
Ship Accidents Mexico Texas Offshore Oil
Water Pollution PEMEX
Issues
186
of
the IXTOC
Oil Well
of
the IXTOC
Blowout
187
Tourism
Sources that contained information about the positive and
negative effects of the IXTOC I oil spill on the tourist
industry, including the hotel, motel, restaurant, and
recreational businesss of South Texas were placed in this
category . Some of the topics were : tourists cleaning their
oil stained feet, whether the oil spill was the cause of the
reduction in tourism, economic losses to the tourist industry
as a result of the oil spill, and advertising campaigns
initiated by the tourist industry to once again attract
tourists to the area .
LeRal/Political Issues
The sources in this classification contained information
on issues related to the liability of the IXTOC I incident
including actual or potential lawsuits . Sources that were
included were : President Lopez-Portillo's response to the
United States concerning payment for damages, testimonies
before hearings or com mittees, and compensation from Mexico for
the damages caused by the oil spill . Sources concerned with
lawsuits included the U .S . Department of Justice suing SEDCO,
the U .S . Department of Justice suing PERMARGO, the State of
Texas suing SEDCO, PEMEX, and PERMARGO, and suits filed by
local businesses for compensation for damages and lost revenue .
Political issues included United States and Mexico relations,
negotiations between the United States and Mexico concerning
the oil spill, and talks between President Carter and President
Lopez-Portillo .
Informational
Some of the articles placed in the informational category
could not be placed in any of the other categories because the
content of the article was divided among several categories .
These articles contained some information on the status of
capping the well, the effect of the oil on tourism, fishing and
the environment, and the progress of litigation . Also included
in this category were articles that dealt with the amount of
oil already lost or being lost each day, reconnaissance flights
tracking the oil slicks, and articles that described the events
of the IXTOC I oil well blowout .
RESULTS
The sample size of the media coverage of the IXTOC I oil
well blowout and BURMAH AGATE sinking consisted of a total of
593 separate reports . The media coverage breaks down into 527
newspaper reports, 38 magazine and journal articles, and 28
televised reports .
Although the collected sample cannot be considered to have
188
KHOU-TV
MEDIA
(a)------------ 10 15 (e)
5
8 .3 (b) 16 .6 25 .00 (f)
-------- ------2 0
N .Y .
TIMES
FISHING
33 .3
31 .7
75 .00
(d)
189
Table 52
BLM MEDIA DATA BY CATEGORY
(NUMBERS OF ARTICLES BY MEDIA BY CATEGORY)
CATEGORY
~
~
'r
MEDIA
~J C~P
i//i
O
0
pQy
Kp
4!~
00
C?~
,t
L A Times 1 5 1 2 2 13 6 3 0 33
Chicago Trib 2 6 0 3 0 11 4 0 0 26
Christ Sci 2 4 0 2 0 9 6 1 0 24
London Times 0 1 0 2 0 11 1 0 0 15
Houston Post 1 6 1 9 2 21 18 2 0 60
Wash Post 0 2 0 3 0 8 5 1 2 21
New Orleans T P 12 9 1 2 2 38 10 1 0 75
Audobon
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
People Mag 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Oil Gas Jour 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Wall Str Jour 0 6 1 0 4 3 4 0 0 18
Science News 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
N Y Times 13 13 0 6 0 32 15 3 0 82
Nat
Geo
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Newsweek
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
5
Time
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
USNWR
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
The Nation 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Outdoor Life 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Aviation Week 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
Business Week 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Dallas News 0 3 1 1 2 9 11 2 0 29
Ft Worth S T 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 5
Dallas T H 0 9 1 2 0 3 14 0 0 29
Austin A S 1 20 2 9 2 12 18 3 0 67
Corpus Christi C 0 4 0 1 0 8 6 2 2 21
San Ant Exp 0 2 0 1 0 3 5 0 0 11
San Ant News 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Houston Chron 0 5 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 11
Jour of Commer 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Corpus Christi T 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Lufkin News 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2
Port Arthur News 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Wichita Falls 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
San Ant Light 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 5
Daily Texan 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 3
Austin Citi 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Houston Break 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1
KPRC
TV
0
0
0
1
1
4
0
3
0
9
KHOU
TV
0
0
0
3
1
3
2
1
0
10
KTRK
TV
0
0
0
2
0
1
2
4
0
9
Total
32
102
10
53
16
190
213
137
28
593
l8
At/W
Ot
L9
kidW
tZ
t9
NVf
OE
08
030
tt
09
100
ZZ
08
lflf
bt
09
AVW
9Z
08
08
kidb' 83d
90
St
a
s
6L
030
LZ
a
s
6L
AON
L0
aa
+ r
rrr
a
a
rrr
6L
d3S
9t
a
ss
rr r
6L
lflf
0
ra+aa r
sras
6L
Nflf
Ot
+aa
.
+
rs
9
L
g
6
?i
aaa .rr
,
aa
,
.
r
aaa
OL
ll
Zi
a r
sssssssss r+sssrssrs s
CL
rs
bl
Sl
, ,
,
9L
Ll
8l
6L
0Z
lZ
,
s
aa
ssr
sa
+sss srrss
arrsrs
rssa
ar
ssss
r
Of
T-
ZZ
c.
rs s
ra
rss
J?Z
a
5Z
s sr
97
LZ
8a
6Z
o
sss
,
s a
cc
~,c
K
~f~.
5
s
ss
~~
L
8
6
,
aaa
lb
017
aan6i=l
Figure 34
PLOT OF CATEGORIES THROUGH TIME
9
**
ra
N
aras
t*
**
tt t
tt~kt tt
ttttttttt
t tt t
tttt :t
10
JUN
79
tt
tt
tttttt
tt t t
tt
tt
ttt tt
30
JUL
79
t t
21
APR
79
ttttttttt
ttt tttttttttt t t
'
18
SEP
79
ttt
tttt
tttt*tt
07
NOV
79
tttttt
ttt
27
DEC
79
15
05
FEB APR
80
80
25
14
MAY JUL
80 80
02
SEP
80
22
OCT
80
11
DEC
80
30
JAN
81
21
MAR
81
193
1
16 12 1
15
14 C
Figure 35
I
Table 53
Circulation Figures*
48,323
128,815
784,388
165,020
69,945
286,955
286,781
247,629
135,271
356,288
331,172
1,000,942
288,448
873,255
79,901
1,838,891
584,500
Houston Chronicle
Houston Post
Los Angeles Times
New Orleans Times-Picayune
New York Times
San Antonio Express
Wall Street Journal
Washington Post
*According to circulation September 30, 1980, 1981 Editor and Publishers International Yearbook ,
Editor and Publisher, New York, New York, 1981 .
195
196
Figure 36
Plot of Categories Covered
~
V
MED IA
Figure 37
38
37
36
35
34
33
32
31
30
=
*
.
f
*
* *
=
29
ff*
* * *
28
27
26
25
1ff
flff
fff
24
23
*f
ff*
**
. .
ff
* ***
22
1f
f
f
.ff
f=Rf!
ff
ff
ff
*
f
=!f
ff
21
20
~
m
co
19
18
17
16
15
14
f f
RRff .ff1f1f!f !
f . .* .!!
.!
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
R!
ff!!
**fi\ f *fff
f=ffRff
fff
! .. *
.
3
2
10
JUN
79
f,Rf
. . .f
f
f fff
Rf
1f
.R*
.ff
*
.
Rfff
.lf .fYfY
30
JUL
79
ff ffffflf
18
SEP
79
.!
7
NOV
79
NOTE:
.
f
f f
Y
f
f
27 15 5
DEC FEB APR
79 80 80
TIME
25 14 2
MAY JUL SEP
80 80 80
22
OCT
80
11
DEC
80
30
JAN
81
Table 54
BLM MAGAZINE DATA
TABLE OF MEDIA BY CATEGORY
CATEGORY
\p~ v~G
A,
U~
?~
Op~p~
~,Q~~
~O
MEDIA
<v
~ Qp
v~P
'`p~.~
e
~
Audubon
People Mag
Oil Gas Jour
Wall Str Jour
Science News
Nat Geo
Newsweek
Time
USNWR
The Nation
Outdoor Life
Aviation Week
Business Week
1
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
2
1
3
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
18
2
1
5
2
2
1
1
1
1
TOTAL
18
38
199
the cost of the IXTOC I oil well blowout . One (2 .63%) of the
articles discussed commercial fishing effects ; five (13 .00%)
dealt with the legal and political issues of the oil well
blowout . The major focus of most of the articles (18 or 47%)
fit into the category of providing information on the
progressions of the oil spill and its subsequent effects .
Figures 38 and 39 portray the relationship between the
category into which the article fell, the journal or magazine's
title, and the period of time in which the article was
presented to the public . Figure 39 shows the plot of the
magazines that were selected for the sample and the time they
were presented to the public . Figure 38 illustrates the
categories of the articles as they appeared in time . Most of
the articles appeared before the oil entered U .S . waters (June
and July) . The last article appeared in Science News (May 2,
1981) and covered the chronological development of the oil
slick .
The journal and magazine publications cater to a specific
segment of the market . The cross section of the journals and
magazines sampled, although not conforming to a planned
sampling technique, presents a view of the IXTOC I oil well
blowout and subsequent oil slick, in language, jargon and
content of interest to the particular market on which the
journal or magazine focuses . The main point is that a wide
cross section of the U .S . public was exposed to pictures,
drawings, and content that surrounded the events of the IXTOC I
oil spill .
Television, a medium of social importance, provided coverage on the IXTOC I oil well blowout and its subsequent effects
on the Texas coastal region . In this sample, three local
channel affiliates (KHOU, KPRC, and KTRK) located in Houston,
Texas and their major news networks (ABC, CBS, and NBC)
presented televised news coverage in the form of early morning
news magazines and evening new .s reports . These reports brought
the events surrounding the IXTOC I oil well blowout and the
resulting oil slick and its environmental/economic/sociological
effects into the presence of the viewing public .
Although the duration of the televised news medium was
relatively short, when compared to the amount of time that the
other media devoted to the oil spill, the potential for shaping
the public's image of the spill and its results should not be
underestimated . The coverage lasted less than 2 weeks (August
3, 1979 to August 15, 1979) as shown by the plot of the
television stations against time (Figure 40) . For the four
days (August 6, 1979 to August 10, 1979) all three stations
carried stories on the oil slick's impact on the Texas coastal
region .
200
Figure 38
PLOT OF MAGAZINE CATEGORIES THROUGH TIME
CATEGORY
**
** *
***
** * *
N
O
~
** **
10
30
18
JUN
79
JUL
79
SEP
79
07
27
15
05
25
APR MAY
80
80
14
02
22
11
JUL
80
SEP
80
OCT
80
DEC
80
TIME
30
JAN
81
21
MAR
81
Figure 39
PLOT OF NUMBER OF MAGAZINE ARTICLES THROUGH TIME
MEDIA
21
20
19
18
17
N
0
N
16
15
14
13
12
11 ** * * * *
***
**
10
*
8
10
JUN
79
30
JUL
79
18
SEP
79
27 15
07
NOV DEC
FEB
79
79
80
05
25
14
02
22
11
30
APR
MAY JUL SEP OCT DEC JAN
80
80
80
80
80
80
81
TIME
NOTE : 1 OBS HAD MISSING VALUES 7 OBS HIDDEN
10
MAY
81
Figure 40
BLM T .V. DATA SUMMARY
(BY DATE OF AIRING AND CATEGORY)
CATEGORY
8
1
03
AUG
79
04 05
AUG AUG
79 79
06
AUG
79
07 08
AUG AUG
79 79
09
AUG
79
TIME
10
AUG
79
11
AUG
79
12
AUG
79
13
AUG
79
14
AUG
79
15
AUG
79
Table 55
BLM T .V . DATA BY CATEGORY
(NUMBER OF AIRED REPORTS BY CATEGORY)
CATEGORY
MEDIA
ENVIRONMENT
FISHING
INFORMATION
LEGAL/
POLITICAL
TOURISM
KPRC TV
KHOU TV
KTRK TV
TOTAL
N=28
204
205
form of news medium had more power in shaping the public's view
of the situation and events that occurred along the Texas
coastal region .
CONCLUSION
One major untested hypothesis is : "Did the media coverage
affect the coastal tourist economy?" Donald Roberts, a noted
mass communication expert, postulates a cause and effects
communication model, " . . . A communication is judged to have
an effect to the extent that it is followed by an observable
response on the part of the receiver which appears to derive
the message ."3 Roberts further classifies his model by
stating, "Communications do not directly mediate overt
behavior . Rather, they tend to affect the way a receiver
organizes his image of the environment and this influences the
way he behaves ."
One indirect indicator of tourist behavior are traffic
counts at a strategic location . Traffic counts at Station S161, located at the Flour Bluff entrance to Padre Island were
obtained from the Nueces County (Pct . 4) Commissioner's office .
The traffic counts are 2-way counts (on and off the Island) for
all vehicles .
Figure 41 plots the traffic counts vs . media coverage .
The slope of the curve is distinctly negative (slope is down)
and falls sharply during the month of August . The media
coverage has several peaks--one at June 10, 1979 corresponding
to the blowout of the IXTOC I and a major peak during the month
of August . Notice that the peak in media coverage corresponds
to the decrease in the traffic counts at the Flour Bluff
entrance to Padre Island .
Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients were
calculated for these variables : dependent = traffic count,
independent = number of newspaper articles, number of magazine
and journal articles, number of televisedd reports, and total
number of reports .
4lbid, p . 361 .
206
Figure 41
TT
T
T
T
T
T
T ~T%%"' T
20 .0
T
T
`T,.o T- T
MM ~
\`T
17 .5
T ; TT
; 15.0
N
0
V
M
T
T
12 .5
T~T
10 .0
M
~
TT
T
TT
T
M
M
T
T`TT/
`T
TM
M
/
T
T~T-T
,,
TT
T
T--~
T
MM
7 .5
M
5.0
.M
~,
M
M
MM
M_TT T T~
MT % T~
`~
T~
,M
~~
2.5
I
`'%M
M
M
M
MM
M
M
M
M
MM
~~
M~% MM . m MM!
0.0
i
31
MAY
79
10
JUN
79
20
JUN
79
30
JUN
79
10
JUL
79
20
JUL
79
MMM
30
09
19
JUL AUG AUG
79
79
79
TIME
M
29
AUG
79
M~
M
08
SEP
79
MM
M
18
SEP
79
MM'i ftM
M
MM
28
08
18
SEP OCT OCT
79
79
79
Newspapers
Magazines
TV
208
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
In any research project of this scope and interdisciplinary nature, there are a great many people who have
been responsible for the final preparation of the IXTOC I Oil
Spill Economic Impact Study . First among these people are the
many public and private agency representatives who cooperated
with the contractor's project team and provided detailed
information and thoughtful guidance in the search for published
and unpublished data sources . Special thanks go to Mr . Nicky
Wright and Mr . John B . Latchford from the Texas Water Resources
Department and Mr . John McVey from the Texas Comptroller's
Office . The efforts of the project team's research assistants
were invaluable, as they fulfilled responsibilities ranging
from data source reviews and content analysis to tabular and
graphic compilation of data and the compilation of the data
appendix materials and bibliographic files . Editorial reviews
of data and manuscripts were provided by the project team
editor, Evelyn Larsen .
Technical assistance and editorial reviews have been
provided by Dr . John D . Wood, John Rodi, Mary R . Bartz, Villere
C . Reggio Jr ., and Susan L . Bakke from. the Bureau of Land
Management .
211
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Economic
Richard J . and Kenneth J . Williamson . 1978 .
Water Pollution Control .
Energy Analyses of Regional
215
Lamphear, F . Charles .
An Interindustry Analysis of Nebraska
for 1976 . Technical Bulletin, Extension Division, Institute
of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska .
Lamphear, F . Charles, and Theodore W . Roesler .
1970 Nebraska
.
Nebraska
Economics
and
Business
Inpu t-O ut put Tables
Reports Number Ten, Bureau of Business Research, University
of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska .
Lamphear, F . Charles, and Theodore W . Roesler .
1967 Nebraska
Input-Output Tables . Nebraska Economics and Business
Report Number Nine . Bureau of Business Research,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska .
Lamphear, F . Charles, and Theodore W . Roesler . 1974 .
Impact
Analysis of Irrigated Agriculture on Nebraska's Economy,
1967-1970
Nebraska Economic and Business Report No . 8 .
Bureau of Business Research, University of Nebraska,
Lincoln, Nebraska .
Lippke, Lawrence A . 1978 .
The Econo m ic Effects of W eather
Modification Activities . Part II : Range Production and
In terindustr y Anal y sis . Publication LP-21 . Texas
Department of Water Resources, Austin, Texas .
Miernyk, Frank Giarratani and Charles F . Socher . 1978 .
Re& io nal Im pa cts of Rising Energy Prices . Cambridge,
Massachusetts : Ballinger Publishing Company .
Nebraska Water Resources Center, University of NebraskaLincoln . A Plan of Study for : A .1 Farm Level Research and
A .3B Impacts Research, High Plains-0gallala Aquifer Area
Study . Nebraska Natural Resources Commission, 1979 .
O'Conner, Robert and Edmun W . Henry . 1975 .
Input-Output
Analysis and Its Applications . Griffin's Statistical
Monographs and Courses, Monograph No . 36 . New York :
Hafner Press, A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co ., Inc .
Polenske, Karen R . 1970 .
A Multiregional Input-Output Model
for the United States . Report No . 21 . Economic
--- --- ------
216
217
218
TOURISM
Archer, B .H . Input-Output Analysis : Its Strength, Limitations,
and Weaknesses : Proceedings, Eighth Annual Conference ;
June 12-15, 1977 ; Scottsdale, Arizona ; Bureau of Economic
and Business Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City ;
The Travel Research Association ; 1977 (pp . 89-107) .
Archer, B .H ., and C .B . Owen Towards a Tourist Regional
Multiplier . J . Travel Research 11(2), Fall : 9 ; 1972 .
Babul, S .J ., R . Lintz, and A . Somersan Impacts of Recreation
and Tourism on the Local Economy : Case Studies of
Minocqua, Woodruff and Algoma . Available from Recreation
Resources Center, University of Wisconsin-Extension,
Madison, WI . ; 1978 .
Blank, U . and M . Petkovich Minneapolis-St . Paul's Travel
Tourism . Available from University of Minnesota, St . Paul ;
1979 .
Boltvinik, J . The Economic Impact of Tourism on the Mexican
Tenth Annual Conference ; June 3-6,
Economy :
Proceedings,
Texas ; Bureau of Economic and Business
1979 ; San Antonio,
Research, University of Utah, Salt Lake City ; The Travel
1979 (pp . 57-67) .
Research Association ;
Church, D .E . Measuring Traveler Volume and Characteristics . J .
Travel Research 9(3), Winter : 8 ; 1970-71 .
Corsi, T .M . and M .E . Harvey Changes in Vacation Travel in
Response to Motor Fuel Shortages and Higher Prices . J .
Travel Research 17(4), Spring : 7 ; 1979 .
Doering, T .R . A Reexamination of the Relative Importance of
Tourism to State Economies . J . Travel Research 15(1),
Summer : 13 ; 1976 .
Environmental Quality-1980 . The Eleventh Annual Report of the
Council on Environmental Quality . Available from the U .S .
Government Printing Office, Washington, D .C . ; 1980 .
Frechtling, D .C . A Model for Estimating Travel Expenditures .
J . Travel Research 12(4), Spring : 9-12 ; 1974 .
Gross Sales Statistics for the State of Texas . Request 9215 .
Austin : Comptroller of Public Accounts ; 1981 .
Gunn, C .A . A New Approach to Coastal Tourism Development .
Paper presented at the National Marine Recreation
Conference, Long Beach, California, May 1970 .
219
220
IA
through 8B :
221
RECREATION
Anderson, S . (ed .) . Recreation-Marine Promise . Los Angeles :
Univ . of Southern California Sea Grant Program ; 1976 .
Baldwin, P . L . and Baldwin, M . E . Onshore Planning for
Offshore Oil-Lessons from Scotland . Washington, D .C . : The
Conservation Foundation ; 1975 .
Beardsley, D . D . A Descriptive Analysis of the Legislative and
Administration Processes involved in Refunding and
Allocating Marine Fuel Taxes in Texas . Unpublished prof .
paper, Dept . of Recreation and Parks, Texas A&M Univ .,
College Station, 76pp . ; 1976 .
Bednarz, P . A . An Analysis of Use and User Characteristics at
Padre Balli County Park on Padre Island (Texas) .
Unpublished Master's Paper, Dept . of Recreation and Parks,
Texas A&M Univ ., College Station, 63pp . ; 1980 .
Burrows, P ., Rowley, C . and Owen, D . The Economics of
Accidental Oil Pollution by Tankers in Coastal Waters .
Journal of Public Economics 3d : 1974 .
Cesario, F . J . Operations Research in Outdoor Recreation .
Journal of Leisure Research 1 :33-51 ; 1969 .
Devanney, J . W . III, Ashe, G . and Parkhurst, B . Parable Beach :
A Primer in Coastal Zone Economics . Cambridge,
Massachusetts : The MIT Press ; 1976 .
Ditton, R . B . and Goodale, T . L . Water Quality Perception and
Recreational Uses of Green Bay, Lake Michigan . Water
Resources Research 9 :569-579 ; 1973 .
Ditton, R . B . and Goodale, T . L . Recreational Uses of Green
Bay : Bay/Non-bay Users Compared . Proceedings of Fifteenth
Conference on Great Lakes Research, pp . 729-736 ; 1972 .
Ditton, R . B ., Seymour, J . L . and Swanson, G . C . Coastal
Resources Management . Washington, D .C . Heath and Co .,
Inc . ; 1977 .
Ditton R . B . and Stephens, M . Coastal Recreation : A Handbook
for Planners and Managers . Washington, D .C . : Office of
Coastal Zone Management, NOAA ; 1977 .
Doering, T . R . Modeling Travel by Recreationists and Tourists
in a Pass Through Region : The Case of Visits to
Educational-Recreational Attractions in Nebraska .
Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Dept . of Geography,
Univ . of Nebraska, Lincoln, 203pp . ; 1977 .
223
224
225
226
COMMERCIAL FISHING
Blomo, Vito, Wade Griffin and John Nichols . 1978 . "CatchEffort and Price-Costs Trends in the Gulf of Mexico Shrimp
Fishery : Implications of Mexico's Extended Jurisdiction ."
Marine Fisheries Review , Vol . 40, No . 7, August .
Burrows, P ., Rowely, C . and Owen, D . The Economics of
Accidental Oil Pollution by Tankers in Coastal Waters .
Journal of Public Economics 3d : 1974 .
Caillouet, C . W ., and F . J . Patella . 1978 . Relationship
Between Size Composition and Ex-vessel Value of Reported
Shrimp Catches from Two Gulf Coast States With Different
Harvesting Strategies, Marine Fisheries Review , 40 :14-18 .
Report on the IXTOC I Oil
Committee on Environmental Affairs .
Spill . Texas House Representatives ; March 10, 1980 .
Capalbo, Susan M . 1976 . "An Analysis of the Market Structure
of the Food Processing Sector of the United States Fishing
Industry ." M .S . Thesis, Department of Resource Economics,
University of Rhode Island .
Center for Wetland Resources . 1980 .
Fishery Management Plan
for the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States
Waters . Prepared for Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management
Council . Tampa, Florida . October .
Christmas, J . Y . and David J . Etzold . 1977 . "The Shrimp
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States : A Regional
Management Plan," Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean
Springs, Mississippi, Technical Report : No . 2 . August .
Chui, Margaret K . 1980 . "Ex-Vessel Demand by Size for the
Gulf Shrimp ." M .S . Thesis in the Department of
Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College
Station, Texas . August .
Doll, J .P . 1972 . An Econometric Analysis of Shrimp Ex-vessel
Prices, 1950-1968 . Am J . of Ag . Eco . 54 :431-440 .
Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and
Budget . Standard Industrial Classification Manual .
Washington, D .C . : U .S . Government Printing Office ; 1972 .
Gran, E . W ., and W . L . Griffin . 1979 . "A Bioeconomic Model of
the Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Fishery," Trans . Am . Fish . Soc .,
Vol . 108 (1) .
Griffin, Wade L . and Bruce R . Beattie . 1978 . "Economic Impact
of Mexico's 200-Mile Off-Shore Fishing Zone on the U .S .
227
228
The Economics
Swartz, A . Nelson and Charles M . Adams . 1979 .
of Rockport, Texas Bay Shri m ping Vessels . DIR 79-1 .
Staff Paper No . 6 Dept . of Agri . Econ . TAES, TAMU . August .
Texas County Statistics .
Texas Department of Agriculture .
Texas Crop and Livestock Reporting Service, Austin, Texas
Selected numbers 1965-1979 .
Sabine-Neches Estuary : A
Texas Department of Water Resources .
Study of the Influence of Freshwater Inflows (Draft) . LP116, Dec . 1979 .
Lavaca-Tres Palacious
Texas Department of Water Resources .
A Study of the Influence of Freshwater Inflow .
Estuary :
LP-106, June 1980 . r
Fisheries of the United States .
U .S . Department of Commerce .
Current Fisheries Statistics, National Marine Fisheries
Service, NOAA . Selected numbers, 1970-1980 .
U .S . Department of Commerce .
Fisheries Statistics o f the
United State s . Current Fisheries Statistics, National
Marine Fisheries Services, NOAA . Selected numbers, 19651976,
Survey o f Current Business ,
U .S . Department of Commerce .
Bureau of Economic Analysis, Vol 58, No . 10, October 1978 .
U .S . Department of Commerce .
Texas Landings, Annual Sum mary .
Current Fisheries Statistics, NOAA . Various numbers, 19651978 .
Warren, John P . The Texas Bay Shrimp Industry :
A Description
and Manage m ent
M odel . Dissertation, Department of
Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University . August
1980 .
229
MEDIA COVERAGE
"Baby Turtles Periled by Oil Spill Flown to Safety ."
Angeles Times , 31 July 1979, sec . 1, p . 1 .
"Battles on Land and Sea ."
Los
"Beach Pollution from Oil Spill Called Most Extensive Yet ."
The Houston Post , 20 August 1979, p . 24 .
Austin American Statesman , 17
"Blown Out Mexican Oil Well Still Gushing Into the Gulf ."
Washington Post , 26 December 1979, sec . A, p . 13 .
"Blowout in the Gulf ."
Chicag o Tr ibune , 24
Dallas
The
Ne w
Orleans
Tim es
Fort
W ort h
Star
Abiline Reporter Ne w s , 19
231
"Clements Says IXTOC I Not Capped, But Runaway Well's Flow Has
Been Halted ." Houston Post , 15 March 1980 .
"Clements Says Oil May Be Sealed Off in IXTOC I Blowout ."
Houston Ch ronicle , 6 February 1980 .
"Coast Guard Keeps Eye on New IXTOC Slick ." Dallas News, 24
January 1980 .
Chri sti
Times
Herald ,
The
Times
Picayune ,
Orleans
Corpus
Ch rist i
Caller,
"Diver Working to Cap Oil Well in Mexico Suffers Bends, Dies ."
Los Angeles Times , 17 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 17 .
"Double Trouble for Oil Spill Fighters ."
August 1979 .
"$800,000 Spent on Oil Spill ."
1979 .
Houston Chronicle , 29
232
The
W all Street
The
"Firefighters Stop Pouring Foam to Fight Tank Blaze Off Texas ."
The New York Ti mes , 25 November 1979, sec . 1, p . 26 .
"Firemen Give Up Effort to Put Out Tanker Fire ."
Tim es, 11 November 1979, sec . 1, p . 30 .
"Fishing Grounds Are Threatened by Blazing Well ."
Tim es - Picayune , 11 June 1979, sec . 1, p . 9 .
The Ne w_
York
New Orleans
Post , 2
C h i cago
The New
Science News , 25
M orning
Newsweek ,
10 September 1979,
"Gulf Blowout Problems Far From Over ." New Orleans Times Picayune , 27 December 1979, sec . 6, p .
1
~
"Gulf Coast Tourist Industry Hails Capping of IXTOC I Well ."
26 March 1980 .
233
"Gulf Oil Slick Stirs New Fears in Texas ." The New York Ti mes ,
~
23 November 1979, sec . 1, p . 24 .
"Gulf Oil Spill's Worst May be Still to Come ." San Antoni o
^
Express , 27 December 1979 .
"Gushing Underwater Oil Well Finally is Capped ." Christian
Scie nce Mo nitor , 25 March 1980, p . 2 .
"High Tides Spread Oil Pollution ." Th e
September 1979, sec . 1, p . 15 .
New
Yo rk Time_s, 14
-
Dallas
Times
Herald ,
New
T he
"Liabilities and Alternatives ."
~
1979, sec . 1, p . 26 .
The
Los An g eles
~
Ti mes, 2
234
The
Los Angeles
The
Orleans
Times _
Times
Times
+
Chicago Tribune , 9
"Mexico Finally Caps Offshore Oil Well that Blew Out June 3 ."
The Wall Street Journal , 25 March 1980, sec . 1, p . 39 .
"Me.xico Help on Spill Said Lacking ."
August 1979 .
235
The
"Mexico Rejects Talks on Oil Spill Liability ." Los An _& eles
Tim es, 2 September 1979, sec . 1, p . 5 .
"Mexico Says It Won't Pay for Damages to Texas Coast ." The New
Y ork Ti mes , 3 October 1979, sec . 1, p . 5 .
"Mexico Says Metal Cone is Curbing Runaway Oil ."
Ti mes , 31 October 1979, sec . 1, p . 6 .
The New
York
Wasingt on
The Ne w_
Orleans Times
Houston Chronicle ,
"More Oil Washes Ashore ." The New York Ti mes , 24 August 1979,
~
sec . 1, p . 26 .
"More or Mousse ."
"More on Spill ."
Science
"New Fissure Sends Oil Well in Mexico Out of Control Again ."
236
Ch i c a g o
The Ne w
~
Dallas
M orni_n g
The New
The Ne w York
i
Washington Post , 19
"Oil on Ship Spurs Firefighters ." The New York Tim es, 12
November 1979, sec . 1, p . 13 .
~
"Oil Perils Wildlife Refuge ."
sec . 1, p . 6 .
"Oil Sighted Off Grande Isle ." New Orleans Times - Picayune , 16
August 1979, sec . 1, p . 1 .
"Oil Slushes Ashore Near Texas Resorts ." New Orleans Times Picayune , 15 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 3
"0i1 Spill at Texas Bay Hits Other Sites ."
18 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 18 .
237
Da llas
"Oil Spill Compensation Voted ." The New York Time s , 17 June
1980, sec . 2, p . 7 .
"Oil Spill Fighters Off Texas Face 5 Weeks of Suspense ." The
New York Times, 21 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 17 .
"Oil Spill 5 Miles Off Texas Coast ."
1979, sec . 1, p . 3 .
"Oil Spill Hit Unlikely ." New
August 1979, sec . 2, p . 15 .
Orleans Times _
Pic a y une, 26
"Oil Spill Hurting Tourism ." The H oust on Post, 17 August 1979 .
"Oil Spill Mess Off Beaches, Into Courts ." Aus tin
Stat esman, 6 December 1979, sec . B, p . 4 .
American
"Oil Spill Reaches Beach in Texas ." Los An .&_ eles Times, 14
August 1979, sec . 1, p . 5 .
"Oil Spill Slows ; Threat to Texas Beaches Slight ." Dal las
Herald, 7 March 1980 .
Times
"Oil Spill Suits Hit $500 Million Before Deadline ." Austin
Am erica n Stat esman, 24 October 1979 .
"Oil Slick Threat Diluted ."
1979, p . 3 .
"Oil Threatens Rare Birds ."
.
27 July
Time,
114, p . 23 .
"Patches of Oil Cover Texas Resort Beach - $13 Million Set
Aside for Clean Up Which May Take 3-4 Months ." Los Angeles
Times, 17 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 17 .
"PEMEX Chief Says Mexico Would Consider IXTOC I Spill Claims ."
Hous ton Pos t, 16 March 1980, sec . A, p . 11 .
"PEMEX Claims Spill Has Not Damaged Marine Life in Gulf ."
Houston Post, 7 October 1979 .
238
Washington Post , 25
Orleans
Times
Washington Post , 16
Austin
Ti mes ,
The
New
York
The
Wall
"Scientists Test Methods to Limit Spill ." New Orleans Times Picayune , 9 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 13 .
"SEDCO, Mexican Firm Hit in Spill Suit ."
19 October 1979, p . 11 .
"SEDCO, Mexican Firms Sued by Fishermen for Oil Spill Losses ."
The W all Street Journal , 14 September 1979, sec . 1, p . 18 .
"SEDCO Sues Mexicans Over Blowout ."
12 March 1980 .
The New
The New
239
The Ne w_ Yo r k Times ,
240
The
Austin American
Business Week ,
Los Angeles
The Ne w_
The L os
^
Outdo o_r_
Ne w
Orleans Times
Picayune , 11
"Texas Sues SEDCO Inc . and Mexican Concern for Oil Spill
Damages ." The Wall Street Journal , 19 October 1979, sec . 1,
p . 34 .
"Texas : The Oil Spill Is Coming ."
Vol . 94, p . 24 .
The
New Y ork
241
New Y or k Times, 26
~
"Tropical Depression Pushes Oil Spill Onto Texas Beach ." Los
Angel es Ti mes , 28 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 5 .
"Two Oil Patches Pose Threat to Texas Bays, Wetlands ." Los
An eles Ti mes , 19 August 1979, sec . 1, p . 13 .
"Ugly Tar Chunks Begin to Blacken S . Texas Beaches ." Dallas
Mornin g News, 8 August 1979, p . 5 .
"Up to 31 Feared Dead, Oil Spilled in Fiery Tanker-Freighter
Collision on Gulf Coast ." Los An gel es Time s , 2 November
1979, sec . 1, p . 4 .
"U .S . Isn't Planning to Sue Mexico ." Dallas Mornin g
August 1979 .
"U .S . May Sue Over Oil Spill ."
1979, sec . 1, p . 16 .
News, 13
News, 8
Orl eans
"U .S . Sues Oil Driller for $6 Million in Mexico Gulf Spill ."
New York Ti mes , 24 October 1979, sec . 1, p . 12 .
The
"U .S . Sues Oil Firm for $6 Million in Mexico for Gulf Spill
Cleanup ." The Los Angeles Ti mes , 24 October 1979, sec . 1,
p. 4.
"U .S . Seeks to Recover $6 Million from SEDCO for Oil Spill
Clean Up ." The W all Street Journal , 24 October 1979, sec .
1, p . 2 .
"Visitors to Texas Coast Warned : Come at Own Risk ." Wa shington
Post , 20 August 1979, sec . A, p . 4 .
"Waves of Oil From Tanker Wash Ashore at Galveston ."
York Times, 20 November 1979, sec . 1, p . 18 .
242
The New
"When a Giant Oil Slick Hits U .S . Shores ." U .S . News and World
Report , 20 August 1979, Vol . 87, p . 50-51 .
Chicago Tribune , 23
Dallas
Austin A m eri ca n
~
Ne ws , 19
Stat esma n , 21
An g eles
"Wind Shift Could Fight Texas Spill ." New O rleans Tim e s
r
Picayune , 22 November 1979, sec . 1, p . 20 .
14 August 1979, p . 14 .
Dall as
243
Times Herald ,
~
Corpus
Ch risti
APPENDIX A
1K:m
Statistics concerning out-of-state visitors to Texas during 1979 are presented in three parts
and consist of grand totals, a detailed profile of auto visitors, and a summation of data relative
to travelers by commerical carriers . Comparisons to figures contained in the 1978 report are
made in all categories .
The report includes national and international visitors to the state, but does not reflect
travel within Texas by Texans .
% of Visitors
1978 % of Visitors
By automobile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19,340,000
(77 .6%)
20,898,000 (81 .1 %)
5,579,000
(22 .4%)
4,855,000 (18.9%)
24,919,000
(100 %)
25,753,000 (100%)
Totals
Expenditures
1979
% of Expend .
1978 % of Expend .
By auto visitors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,313,054,000 (76.5%)
Totals
$4,837,623,000 (100 %)
$4,333,370,000 (100%)
A-3
EXPENDITURES
Per Person
Per Party
Per Day
Per Day
1979 1978
U .S . Visitors (short term)
U .S . Visitors ( long term)
1978 ',
1979
$51.37
10.08 9 .14
20.87
20.65
19.78
13.97 8.38
60.73
43.88
51 .58 '
28.14 ,
Mexican Visitors'
1979
1,485.24
521.07
2,932.35
1,163.91
Total Spending
1978
1979
$ 314 .77
1,535 .52
$ 2,216,885,000
813,040,000
173,340,000
109,604,000
250,392,000
411 .11
2,137 .54
1,010 .35
TOTALS
$3,563,261,000
1978
E2,089 .108,000
801 .708 .000
111 .692 .000
72 .592 .000
237,954,000
$3,313 .054,000
' From reports provided by the U .S . Travel Servic e, U .S. Dept . of C ommerce. Data for Mexi can visitors are included only
where indicated and are incorporated in all appl icabie totals .
1979
6.81 days
1978
6.66 days
71 .15 dalrs
74.36 days
8S8 dap
66.83 days
7 .97 days
75.95 days
1979
1978
1979
1978
85,2q,
86.1 %
52
53
0.6
3.1
5.6
4.6
0.6
3 .1
16,477,000
1,133,000
17, 986,000
1,180,000
1,021,000
970,000
117,000
114,000
TOTALS
' From reports provided by U .S.T .S . and the U .S . Immigration and Naturalization Service
592,000
648,000
19,340,000
20,898,000
1979
2.60 pen,aa
1978
2 .71 persons
2.07 persaa
2 .26 persons
3.07 pown
3 .57 persons
3.14 peRara
2.75 penwns
3 .36 persons
2 .75 persons
Food
Lodging
Entertainment
1979
1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979
2E.1V
30.2
21 .24:
19 .1
24.94 25.69
24 .8 26 .0
23.64 24.54
23 .5 25 .0
8.5;
6 .6
26 .7
20 .2
23 .5 26 .3
23 .7 26 .1
7 .0
9 .7
31 .7
18 .8
21 .4 28 .2
16 .2 27 .6
8.6
10 .0
A-4
1978
9 .34
7 .6
Othar
1979 1978
14 .34
14.9
19.1
22.1
19 .4 ;
22 .3
17 .7
15 .4
rank
1979 1978
City
U .S . Visitors
(short term)
U.S. Visitors
(long term)
Total Est.
Person Visits
Dallas
5,529,900
252,400
351,500
22.000
6,155,800
2
3
1
2
San Antonio
Houston
4,503,000
4,405,700
430,100
308,600
410,300
338,500
52,300
41,800
5 .395,700
5 .094,600
Ei Paso
2,784,400
223,900
359,800
13,700
3,381,800
Fort Worth
2,175,500
107,100
86,900
9,700
2,379,200
6
7
5
6
Austin
Galveston
1,872,600
1,583,400
155,000
103,500
147,100
143,900
69,200
10,400
2,243,900
1,841,200
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
8
10
11
12
19
9
17
Corpus Christi
Brownsville
Laredo
Arlington
McAllen
Amarillo
Harlingen
1,335,800
1,136,800
979,900
1,034,400
667,000
762,200
519,500
194,300
296,700
132,300
16,900
259,200
38,900
221,000
97,000
81,100
85,100
15,900
26,000
69,600
19,500
18,700
14,800
12,600
2,900
9,000
2,200
9,400
1,645,800
1 .529,400
1 .209,900
1,070,100
961,200
872 .900
769,400
15
14
Del Rio
582,600
87,600
78,600
7,600
756,400
16
22
598,800
89,100
44,700
2,900
735 .500
17
20
Abilene
547,300
22,000
82,900
6,100
658,300
18
19
20
16
13
18
Waco
Beaumont
Texarkana
585,500
538,600
426,500
41,500
29 .200
49,800
23 .800
44,700
35 .300
4,700
2,500
1 .400
655,500
615,000
513,000
21
23
Wichita Falls
359,100
25,200
30,300
700
415,300
22
23
15
25
Fort Stockton
Johnson City
366,700
372,400
21,300
23,100
25,600
15,500
1,400
-
415,000
411,000
24
24
Tyler
352,600
23,400
17,700
393,700
25
26
21
-
Van Horn
San Marcos
291,700
256,000
27,400
19,800
19,800
13,300
400
2,200
339,300
291 .300
27
26
Denton
269,300
11,900
6,100
287,300
23
29
30
28
30
-
Lubbock
Fredericksburg
Mission
258,100
224,600
134,800
16,600
33,200
100,200
9,000
19,100
3,200
2,200
700
3 .200
285 .900
277,600
241,400
RanN
1979 1978
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
5
5
4
6
6
7
7
8
8
9
9
P.rea
North
East
West
Hill Country
Gulf Coast
South
Rio Grande Valley
Central
Panhandle
U.S. Visitors
U.S. Visitors
(short term)
(long term)
7,764,000
352,200
5,727,000
405,200
4,671,400
390,800
4,015,900 '
390,500
3,750,900
393,700
3,306,800
385,800
2,308,100
640,000
2,249,400
174,500
1,176,800
64,500
A-5
Total Est.
Person Visits
8,566,900
6,575,700
5,583,900
4.786 .000
4,455,400
4,000 .500
3,122,600
2 .604,100
1,340,500
States ( by
Region)
Short Term
1979 1978
25.0%
25 .1%
5.8
6 .0
Indiana
Iowa
Michigan
2.6
2.7
4.5
2.9
3.7
3.4
14
12
2 .4
5.5
4 .9
12
16
4.3
9.7
10 .1
Minnesota
Ohio
3.3
3.5
3 .0
3 .9
6.5
4.7
6 .5
5 .5
9
10
10
8
Wisconsin
2.6
2.6
5.5
5.5
13
25.6%
2.5
21 .0%
2 .4
3 .4
4 .6
2 .0
14.2%
1 .4
3.8
4.7
0.9
13 .1%
1 .0
3 .0
4 .8
1 .3
11.5
8.6
3.4
3.0
22.7%
1.3
3.6
4.7
24.3%
9:5%
9 .0%
(3) (2)
1.5
2.7
6.0
0.6
1.8
2.2
0.8
1.6
2.4
23
11
7
25
15
5
FRONTIER WEST
Arizona
Kansas
Missouri
New Mexico
Okl ahoma
THE SOUTH
Alabama
Arkansas
Florida
4.2
5.1
2.3
14
(2) (3)
16 17
8
9
5
7
18 18
Georgia
1 .6
1 .8
0.5
0 .4
21
20
Kentucky
Louisiana
0.7
5.8
0.8
6.3
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.9
32
4
33
4
Mississippi
North Carolina
1 .4
1 .1
1 .6
1 .3
0 .6
0 .6
0 .4
0.6
22
28
22
28
South Carolina
0.7
0.8
0.4
0.4
33
32
Tennessee
1 .8
1 .5
0 .8
1 .0
20
23
10.7%
0.2 .
7 .8
0.3
11 .8%
0 .2
8 .5
0 .3
12.996
0 .2
7 .4
0.5
13 .4%
0.2
8.6
0.6
(4)
47
2
39
(4)
47
1
37
FAR WEST
Alaska
California
Idaho
Nevada
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.4
40
42
Oregon
1.0
1 .1
1 .6
29
30
Washington
1.1
1.5
2.0
2.2
2.0
26
21
(6)
MOUNTAIN WEST
4.9%
4.5%
8,49{,
7 .7%
(5)
Colorado
2.1
1.8
2.9
Montana
Nebraska
North Dakota
3.1
19
19
0.3
1 .2
0.2
0.2
1 .2
0.3
0 .3
1 .8
0 .9
41
24
42
44
27
38
South Dakota
0.4
2.1
0.9
0.4
0.4
1.0
0.9
35
35
Utah
Wyoming
0.4
0.3
0 .4
0 .2
0.4
0.5
0 .5
0 .4
36
38
36
43
5 .1%
0.2
0 .1
6 .1%
0 .2
0 .1
5 .0%
0.1
-
5 .7%
0 .5
0 .1
(6)
45
50
(5)
45
50
Maryland
0.9
1.2
0.7
0.7
30
29
Pennsylvania
Virginia
West Virginia
2.3
1.2
0.4
2.8
1 .5
0.3
2.9
0 .7
0 .6
3 .0
1 .1
0 .3
17
27
37
13
24
39
A-6
1979
3.8%
1.2
2.6
4 .6%
1 .5
3 .1
4.6%
1 .4
3.2
4 .2%
0 .9
3 .3
(7)
25
15
(7)
26
11
2.1%
0 .5
2 .4%
0 .6
3.0%
0.5
3 .2 %
0 .7
(8)
34
(8)
34
Maine
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
0.2
0.8
0.2
0.3
0.9
0.3
0.1
1.1
0.6
0.5
1.1
0.4
44
31
43
41
31
40
Rhode Island
0 .2
0 .2
0.3
0 .2
48
48
Vermont
0.2
0.1
0.4
0.3
46
46
States (
by
Region)
THE ISLANDS
Short
0.1%
Hawaii
Puerto Rico
0 .2%
0 .1 0 .1
*
0 .1
Virgin Islands
0.2%
0 .2%
(9)
(9)
0 .1
0.1
49
51
49
51
52
*
0.1
0.1
1979
1978
1
33.9
5.4
5.8
2
3
4
2
4
3
2 .1
6
7
Mexico
34.4%
1978
37 .4%
Canada
Great Britain
Germany
26.6
9.1
8.5
3.0
Australia
Rank
% of Foreign
1979
Switzerland
The Netherlands
2.1
2.5
2.1
1.2
6
7
France
Israel
Sweden
Austria
2.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
1 .1
0 .6
1 .2
0 .3
8
9
10
11
9
12
8
15
Denmark
Japan
0.7
0.7
0.9
0.4
12
13
10
14
South Africa
0.5
0 .6
14
11
Argentina
China
Iran
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
15
16
17
18
17
Italy
Brazil
0 .2
0.2
0.1
0 .2
18
19
22
20
Russia
0.2
20
Norway
0.2
0 .4
21
13
Greece
0.1
22
India
Ireland
Yugoslavia
All other foreign
0.1
0.1
0 .1
5 .0
0 .1
4 .7
23
24
25
25
-
A-7
PURPOSE OF VISIT
(incorporates Multiple Responses by Visitors)
Vacation 3 ~
Vacation Onh
Other
1979 1978
U .S . Visitors (short term) 22 .196 22.7%
U .S . Visitors (long term)
40.0 39.8
Foreign Visitors' (short term) 30.5 35 .7
Foreign Visitors' (long term) 40 .4 40 .0
1979 1978
U .S . Visitors (short term)
5.8%
U .S . Visitors (long term) 4 .5
Foreign Visitors' (short term) 2 .4
Foreign Visitors' (long term) 12 .8
*Excluding Mexican Visitors
4 .9%
5 .3
1 .1
4 .2
Passing Thru I
Passing Thru
& Other
Only
& Other
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979
45.9% 49 .1%
10.8% 9.6%
37.0% 38 .3%
5.3% 5 .2%
41 .7 42 .3
4.7 4.2
35.6 35 .7
1.5 1 .3
9.9 9 .8
56 .6 51 .8
2.7 3 .2
26.2 22 .8
5.3 5 .3
34.5 33.1
40.4 46.7
Buainess Only
Visit Friends/Rel. I
Visit Friends/
Relatives Only
5.5 5 .0
30 .3 35.0
1978
1979 1978
16.8% 19 .0%
- 0 .8 ~
Convention
Convention
Onfy
& Other
Business &
Other
Moving to Texas
Only
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
10 .59610.0%
2.5b 1 .8%
2.5%
10.7 9.6
2 .5 2.3
5.5 5 .9
1979 1978
1 .6% 1 .4%
0.1 0.3
6.6 6 .4
1.0 0.2
2.9 2 .0
0.2
5.5 10 .8
- 0.8
3.7 4 .2
Moving to Texas
& Other
2 .5%
9 .2 7 .5
1979 1978
3.6% 3 .7%
2.4 3 .2
L0 2 .9
- 4 .2
0.2
TOURING TEXAS
"Touring" describes visitors who traveled in two or more areas of the state and journeyed In excess of 1,550 miles .
u.S. V'sitors
(short term)
U.S. Visitas
1979 1978
2,362,200 2,543,100
(long term)
1979 1978
600,000
634,600
Foreign V'aitors'
(sbart term)
1979 1978
192,600 175,500
Foreign Visitors'
(leng term)
1979 1978
53,200
64,700
TOW
1979 1978
3,208,000 3,417,900
U.S. Visitors
(long term)
1979 1978
1,036 1,055
1979 1978
2,698 2,755
Foreign V'aitas'
(shart term)
Foreign Visitas'
(long termi
1979 1978
1,210 1,248
1979 1978
2,592 2,579
2534
1979 1978
35-49
1979
1978
50664
65+
13.8% 14 .0%
4.7 5.2
21 .3%
6.4
22 .6%
6 .9
1979
40.7%
42.0
11 .1
25.9 25 .2
24.5
24 .5
27 .0
27 .8
4.4
12.5 13 .9
14.4
15 .6
42 .3
36 .5 ~
1979
5.5%
3.7
1978
5.4%
4.9
15.2
10.6
A-8
1978
40 .3%
45 .4
1979
1978
18.196
43.2
17 .7%
37 .6
7.4
11 .4
20 .2
29 .6
LODGING
(incorporates Multiple Responses by Visitors)
MoteVltotd
Onh
Motel/Holel
& Other
Prieste Home
Only
Private Home
i Other
Rec. Vehicle
Only
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
35 .5% 36 .6%
8 .8 7 .7
36.4 36 .9
7 .3 8.3
29 .2% 29 .6%
34.1 32 .8
34.5 35 .0
36.4 45 .8
14.2% 13 .0%
3 .3 4.3
7 .3 6.1
15.5 14 .2
21 .7% 22 .3%
21 .8 20 .1
16 .8 14 .8
25 .5 25.8
9 .9% 9.2%
27.0 29.9
10.3 11 .7
22.7 19 .2
Camping
0114
Camping
Apertment
Apartment
i OtlNr
Only
i Other
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1978
1979 1918
3.4%
2 .5
9 .2
1 .8
11 .5% 12 .3%
25.9 23 .8
13.4 16.9
19.1 16.7
1 .3%
3.1
0.5
3.6
2.6% 2 .6%
10.0 10 .5
2 .5 1 .8
13 .6 14 .2
Rec . Vehicle
i Other
1979
U .S . Visitors ( short term)
U .S. Visitors ( long term)
Foreign Visitors' (short term)
Foreign Visitors' (long term)
1978
11 .6% 12 .0%
33 .5 29.6
11 .3 11 .3
22 .7 24 .2
3 .6%
2 .8
8 .7
3 .3
1 .0%
3 .7
0 .8
FAMILY INCOME
Under $7,000
1979
1978
Over =22,000
1979
1978
1979
1978
1979
1978
1979
1978
5 .5%
6 .5%
15 .1%
17 .2%
15 .5%
11 .0%
21 .7%
36.3%
10 .1
12 .6
27 .1
33 .7
21 .2
' I9 .3
19 .6
23 .0%
17 .1
42.2%
22.0
17 .3
8 .4
8 .3
10 .6
14 .0
14 .8
29 .2
16 .7
15 .8
20 .8
17 .0
12 .2
21 .6
17 .7
21 .0
14 .9
39.4
24.0
34 .7
26 .2
32 .7
Yes
1979 1978
1979 1978
78.2% 74 .9%
82.3 82 .8
25.9
29 .9
42 .7
50 .4
21 .8% 25 .1%
17 .7 11 .2
74 .1 70 .1
57 .3 49 .6
No
1979 1978
1979
1978
27 .1% 28 .3%
69 .1 68 .9
41 .1 45 .7
71 .3 66 .9
72 .9%
30.9
58.9
28.7
71 .1%
31 .1
54 .3
45.7
A-9
Number of Visitors
Mode
1979
U .S . Visitors by Air
Mexican Visitors by Air'
Foreign Visitors by Air'
Visitors by Bus
Visitors by Rail
TOTALS
4,570,000
154,000
1979 1978
1978
3,974,000
134 .000
132,000
62,000
651,000
72,000
626,000
59,000
5,579,000
4 .855,000
Total
Spending
$231 .07
423.24
423.24
134.57
$ 218 69
367 40
367.40
116.15
134.57
116.15
1979
1978
$1,055,956,000
65,0 110,000
56,027,000
67,654,000
9,645,000
$869,089,000
49,092,000
22,647,00
72,684,000
6,804.000
$1,274,362,000
51,020,316 .000
DATA SOURCES:
Oklahoma Transportation Company
TNMdO Coaches, Inc.
AMTRAK
Civil Aeronautics Board
Greyhound Lines, Inc .
International Association of Convention & Visitor Bureaus
Trailways
U.S . Immigration & Naturalization Service
U.S . Travel Data Center
U.S . Travel Service (U .S. Department of Commerce)
21,000 auto travel parties from out of state .
Compiled by
State Department of Highways and Public
Transportation, Travel & Information Division
Box 5064, Austin, Texas 78763 .
A-10
APPENDIX B
APPENDIX B
COUNTY WORKSHEET FOR SIC DATA AC Q UIRED FROM THE TEXAS
COMPTROLLER OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTS
1 st Quarter, (year)
SIC
SIC
Other
Other
Retai I 591 Retai I
591
592
592
594
598
599
594
598
599
Total
Total
Rec '
Services
Rec
Services
791
783
791
793
793
794
799
Total
794
799
783
Total
SIC
Other
Retai 1 591
592
594
598
Other
Retai I 591
592
594
598
599
Total
599
Total
Rec
Rec
Services 783 Services
791
793
783
791
793
794
794
799
Total
799
Total
B-3
APPENDIX C
TOURISM SURVEY DATA
I[
September 7, 1979
Paul Y . ningham,
PYC :ls
December 6, 1979
Joint Statement
from
Port Isabel-South Padre Island Chamber
of
Commerce
and
Prepared by
Bill Heinze
C-4
port isabel
south padre island
chamber of commerce
p .o . box 2098
s . padre island,
texas 78597
Survey of the Economic Impact of the Mexican IXTOC I Oil Spill
on Business of the Laguna Madre Area, August and October, 1979
percentage of number of
decreased bus iness responses-Sept .
number of
responses-Oct .
.0-10
11-20
21-30
31-40
3
14
9
8
41-50
51-60
61-70
15
19
20
3
11
2
71-80
17
81-90
91-100
103
48
number
number
closed
reporting increases
reporting same amount
during reporting period
Grand total
C-5
11
8
4
71
Survey, page 2
The breakdown of responses by category of business for August
is as follows :
percentage
of
retail
decreased business accommodations restaurants stores Misc*
0-10
0
0
11-20
1
1
21-30
1
0
31-40
8
0
41-50
3
0
51-60
6
2
61-70
2
6
71-80
4
3
81-90
1
0
91-100
0
0
total
26
12
0
0
1
3
3
5
3
7
4
0
26
3
1
1
3
9
6
9
3
3
1
39
22
2
4
1
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
3
1
3
0
2
1
0
5
4
5
0
3
1
0
26
19
C-6
Survey, page 3
- with inflation and the increased growth of business
experienced earlier in the year, the level of business as
compared to the budgeted projections for August 1979 would show
even greater losses
- the pervasive effect of the decrease in tourism on the total
economy of the area may be seen ; less dollars are brought into
and spent in the communities, less dollars are spent within the
communities
- in October four businesses were closed temporarily due to the
lack of business
- although business in general is becoming less seasonal, fall
has traditionally been a slower time for business
prepared by :
Sue MacFarland Groves,
Manager
C-7
MARINA
William D . and wife Ann M . Suhr have owned the White Sands
Motor Lodge & Marina in Port Isabel, Texas, since August 1,
1973 . The motel consists of 13 kitchen units and 17 motel
units .
The month of August is traditionally the best in total room
rentals and accounts for approximately one eighth of total
annual receipts .
The following comparisons will show the losses incurred
through August 31, 1979, because of the Mexican oil spill, and
reduced tourist activity .
MOTEL OCCUPANCY
MONTH OF AUGUST (31 days)
13
Kitchens
17
Motel
Units
401
401
402
139
521
525
526
246
C-8
C-9
o ~ nn ~
C IMJQWOINQ
PHONE : 512-943-1001
YOUR HOSTS :
SONJA and DAN WtLKINS
Motel
Date
Occupancy
Rate
consists
of a 24 efficiency unit
Marina
Date
Charters
August 1 to . 6
August 7 to Sept . 3rd
Sept . 3 to Sept . 30th
4
1
0
Bait
Date
Sold
August
1
to
6th
90%
August
6
to
28
20%
August
28
no
bait
Since the talk of the oil slick from July 21st to Sept . 3rd, we
estimate a loss of $12,000 .00 .
Dan E .
(T/S)
C-10
Wilkins
APPENDIX D
TOURISM INDIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT
APPENDIX D
TOURISM INDIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT
INTRODUCTION
Estimates of indirect economic impacts associated with the
tourism group, which is comprised of Automotive, Eating and
Drinking Establishments, and the Lodging sectors, need to be
interpreted in the same manner as the impact estimates for the
recreation group discussed in a separate chapter . Briefly,
indirect economic impacts refer to changes in the activity
levels of some initiating sector . To illustrate, a decline in
hotel gross receipts due to, say, higher gas prices represents
the direct impact . The hotel sector is, then, the initiating
sector for various indirect economic impacts . A decline in
hotel gross receipts means, in addition, a decline in
expenditures for laundry services, lavatory notions, and the
like . A decline in the purchase of these services and items
means further that the respective suppliers will purchase less
of those things required in the operation of their businesses,
and so on it goes .
recall from the earlier
For interpretative purposes,
chapter on methodology that a regional point of view--not an
establishment point of view--was assumed with respect to impact
Important here is the realization that an area or
measurement .
regional analysis of economic impact conceals the extent of
economic impact at the establishment level . The previous
section on the discussion of the current direct economic impact
provided some information on the variation of economic impact
at the establishment level .
INDIRECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT MODEL
The model used to estimate the current indirect, inducedby economic impact associated with the oil spills on tourism
was a regional input-output framework . This model is separate
from the baseline framework just discussed . In fact, the
baseline framework provided the direct impact information for
the input-output model to measure indirect economic impacts .
Eighteen different regional input-output models, each
containing 65 economic sectors, were constructed for this
study . A listing of the economic sectors contained in these
models is given in Table D-1 . The construction of these
different input-output models reflects 1) the delineation of
six impact study areas, comprising the total 19-county study
region and 5 subregional divisions within the total study
region, and 2) the establishment of a 3-year study period,
1979-1981 . An extensive discussion of 1) general input-output
analysis and 2) how input-output models were developed for this
study can be found in the Input-Output M odel for Econom ic
D-3
Table D-1
Sector Descriptions
Sector No .
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Sector Title
Crop Production
Livestock & Livestock Products
Agricultural Supply,
Ginning & Agri .
Services
Primary Forestry
Commercial Fishing
Crude Pet . & Natural Gas
Natural Gas Liquids
Oil and Gas Services
Other Mining
Construction
Meat Products
Dairies
Grains
Bakeries and Foods
Beverages
Textiles
Wood and Furniture
Newspapers & Printing
Chemicals
Petroleum
Plastic, Leather, and Glass
Clay, Stone, and Cement
Metals
Machinery
Electrical Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Other Manufacturing
Railroad
Motor Vehicle
Water Transportation
D-4
Sector Title
Sector No .
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
D-5
D-6
Table D-2
Output Multiplier Coefficients
for Subregion Five, 1979
Sector
Automotive
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0 .000442
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
0
.000096
.000053
.000024
.000007
.000018
.000117
.000012
.000001
.000009
.001319
.000038
.000182
.000000
.000140
.000135
.000213
.012626
.000069
.000000
.000043
.000131
.000232
.000494
.000946
.006488
.000086
.000457
.002057
.000008
.002088
.005506
.009769
.000010
.001144
.014250
.000181
.000613
.000112
.000008
.001289
D-7
Eati .ng
and
Drinking
Lodging
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.037273
.008431
.003766
.000010
.003013
.000166
.000013
.000001
.000010
.000941
.013836
.006247
.000000
.001742
.001314
.000312
.000024
.000434
.000321
.000008
.000002
.000039
.006860
.002032
.002659
.000000
0 .066743
0 .010696
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.002128
.000248
.000315
.005568
.000350
.000000
.000085
.000135
.000557
.006308
.001512
.000633
.000110
.001228
.003413
.000120
.001848
.002934
.004631
.000007
.001648
.017820
.000407
.000031
.030716
.000983
.001 .663
.007166
.001851
.000744
.007218
.000448
.000000
.000052
.000530
.000696
.002027
.001506
.000478
.000091
.002124
.002382
.000039
.003491
.015131
.003983
.005951
.003190
.030875
.000411
.000015
.016748
.000166
.001378
Eating
Sector Automotive and
Number
Drinking
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Total Output
Multiplier
0 .002200
0 .000030
0 .000018
0 .000001
0 .000016
1 .000000
0 .000000
0 .000936
0 .000543
0 .007482
0 .018332
0 .002224
0 .000922
0 .001409
0 .004602
0 .000046
0 .001474
0 .000036
0 .000025
0 .005526
0 .002384
0 .000745
0 .000094
1 .110454
0 .007763
0 .000083
0 .000268
0 .000001
0 .005005
0 .001743
0 .000001
1 .000000
0 .003522
0 .005617
0 .018992
0 .002820
0 .000780
0 .001511
0 .003169
0 .020251
0 .005672
0 .000101
0 .000034
0 .006271
0 .002755
0 .000734
0 .000124
1 .313062
Lodging
0 .012774
0 .000119
0 .000063
0 .000231
0 .005742
0 .001284
0 .000000
0 .002597
0 .002512
0 .009270
0 .015905
0 .008666
1 .000000
0 .009508
0 .004031
0 .000260
0 .003805
0 .000035
0 .000023
0 .034869
0 .005065
0 .003255
0 .000508
1 .255657
D-8
D-9
Table D-3
Summary of Direct Economic Impacts, by Subregion
for 1979, Adjusted for Input-Output Model
Sector
Subregion
Name
One
Subregion
Subregion
Two
Three
Subregion
Four
Auto-
motive
Restau-
rants
Subregion
Five
($908,098
x 0 .29509)
_ $267,971
$1,150,624
Lodging
$1,798,574
D-10
D-11
Table D-4
Total Economic Impacts, by Sector
for Subregion Five, 1979*
Sector
Automotive
Eating
Number
Lodging
and
Drinking
26
42,887
3,133
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
14
6
2
5
31
3
0
2
353
10
49
0
118
38
36
57
3,383
18
0
12
35
62
132
254
1,739
23
122
551
2
560
1,475
2,618
3
307
9,701
4,333
12
3,467
191
15
1
12
1,083
15,920
7,188
0
76,796
2,449
285
362
6,407
403
0
98
155
641
7,258
1,740
728
127
1,413
3,927
138
2,126
3,376
5,329
8
1,896
2,363
561
43
781
577
14
4
70
12,338
3,655
4,782
0
19,238
12,889
3,329
1,338
12,982
806
0
94
953
1,252
3,646
2,709
860
164
3,820
4,284
70
6,279
27,214
7,164
10,703
5,737
36
3,819
20,504
55,531
37
38
39
40
41
49
164
30
2
345
468
36
35,343
1,131
1,913
739
27
30,123
299
2,478
D-12
Sector
Number
Automotive
Eating
and
Drinking
Lodging
8,932
96
308
1
5,759
2,005
1
1,150,624
4,052
6,463
21,853
3,245
22,975
214
113
415
10,327
2,309
0
4,670
4,518
16,673
28,606
15,586
247
897
1,798,574
378
1,739
17,101
56
57
58
1,233
12
395
3,646
23,301
6,526
7,250
468
6,844
59
10
116
63
60
61
62
63
64
7
1,481
639
200
25
39
7,216
3,170
845
143
41
62,714
9,110
5,854
914
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
590
8
5
0
4
267,971
0
251
146
2,005
4,912
596
54
55
D-13
D-14
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX E
LISTING OF COMPONENT BUSINESSES IN SIC CATEGORIES 799
(MISC . AMUSEMENT AND RECREATION SERVICES)
systems, coin-operated
7996
Amusement Parks
Establishments known as amusement parks, kiddie parks,
etc ., which group together and operate in whole or in part
a number of attractions such as mechanical rides,
amusement devices, refreshment stands and picnic grounds .
Amusement concessionaires operating within the park are
classified in Industry 7999 .
Amusement centers, and parks Kiddie parks
(not fairs, circuses or Piers, amusement
carnivals) Theme parks (amusement)
Amusement parks
E-3
7997
and recreation
Country clubs, membership
Flying fields, maintained by
aviation clubs
Classified
Bathing beaches,
nonmembership
Boat rental, pleasure
E-4
7999 (continued)
Exhibition operation
Exposition operation
Fairs, agricultural :
operation of
Fireworks display service
Fishing lakes, operation of
Fortune tellers
Gambling establishments, not
primarily operating coinoperated machines
Gambling machines, except
coin-operated : operation of
Game parlors (not coinoperated)
Games, teaching of
Go-kart raceway operation
Go-kart rentals
Ski instruction
Ski lifts, cable lift, ski
towers : operated separately from lodges
Ski rental concessions
Slot-car race tracks
Sports instructors, professional : for golf,
skiing, swimming, etc .
Sports professionals
Swimming instruction
Swimming pools
Tennis clubs, nonmember
Tennis courts, outdoor and
indoor : operation of nonmembership
Tennis professionals
Ticket sales offices for
sporting events contract
Tourist attractions,
natural wonder : commercial
Tourist guides
Trampoline operation
Wax figure exhibitions
Yoga instruction
Zoological gardens,
commercial
Rental of bicycles
Source : Executive Office of the President, Office of
Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification
Manual, U .S . Government Printing Office ; 1972 .
E-5
APPENDIX F
COUNTY EXPENDITURES WORKSHEET
APPENDIX G
APPENDIX G
County Total
County Total
Other
Retail
Other
Retail
Total
Total
Rec
Rec
Service
Service
Total
Total
2nd Quarter ,
4th Quarter,
( year)
( year)
County Total
County Total
Other
Other
Retail
Retail
Total
Total
Rec
Rec
Service
Service
Total
Total
G-3
APPENDIX H
RECREATION INDIRECT ECONOMIC
IMPACT
APPENDIX H
RECREATION INDIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT
INTRODUCTION
Indirect economic impact, as noted in other chapters of
this report, refers to the differing rounds of transactions
(that is, purchase/sales) that occur as a result of an initial
change in some economic unit's level of activity . The initial
change is the direct economic effect or impact, and all
subsequent and related changes in economic activity are the
indirect economic impacts . Recall that in view of the funding
level and study requirements of this study, indirect impact
estimates are limited to the "induced-by" impacts .
A decline in Recreation Services, which, in part, makes up
the Recreation category for this study, is the direct economic
impact that is initiated by some exogenous event, such as an
oil spill . But, the decline in Recreation Services, measured
in gross receipts, means a decline in expenditures for paint
and hardware supplies, tractor fuel, and the like, used in the
operation of recreation services . A decline in the demand for
these items means further that the respective suppliers will
purchase less of those things required in their operations, and
so on it goes as the initial economic impact ripples across the
economic landscape . The combined changes in economic activity
beyond the direct impact, as illustrated here, is referred to
as the indirect, induced-by economic impact . The total
economic impact, which is the sum of the direct and indirect
impacts, is some multiple of the direct economic impact,
reflecting the well-established notion of an impact multiplier .
INDIRECT IMPACT ASSESSMENT MODEL
The model used to estimate the indirect economic impacts
associated with the oil spills and recreation was a regional
input-output framework . Eighteen regional input-output models,
each containing 65 economic sectors, were constructed for this
study . A listing of the sectors contained in these models is
provided in Table H-1 . The construction of the 18 input-output
models reflects 1) the delineation of six impact study areas,
comprising the total 19-county study region and five
subregional divisions within the total study region, and 2) the
establishment of a 3-year study period, 1979-1981 . An
extensive discussion of 1) general input-output analysis and 2)
how input-output models were developed for the study areas can
be found in the Input-Output Model for Economic Analysis
Instructional Manual .
As with any analytical model, several key assumptions were
necessary as part of the formulation of an input-output
framework specific to the needs of the study . These
H-3
Table H-1
Sector Descriptions
Sector No .
Sector Title
Crop Production
2
3
Services
Primary Forestry
Commercial Fishing
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Dairies
13
14
15
16
Grains
Bakeries and Foods
Beverages
Textiles
17
18
19
20
Petroleum
21
22
23
24
Metals
Machinery
25
26
27
Electrical Equipment
Transportation Equipment
Other Manufacturing
28
29
Railroad
Motor Vehicle
30
31
Water Transportation
Air and Other Transportation
32
Telephone
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Gas Services
Electric Services
Water and Sanitary Services
Wholesale Automotive
Groceries
40
41
42
43
General Wholesale
Retail Lumber Yards
H-4
Sector Title
Sector No .
44
45
46
Food Stores
47
48
Retail, Furniture
49
50
51
Other Retail
Banking
52
53
54
55
56
57
Lodging
Personal Services
Advertising & Other Business Services
Recreational Services
58
59
Doctors
60
Hospitals
61
62
63
64
65
66
Education
Colleges
Other Services
Outdoor Recreation
Households
Sector Totals
H-5
&
Real Estate
H-6
Table H-2
Summary of Direct Economic Impacts, by
Subregion, for 1979
Sector Sub- Sub- Sub- Sub- Subregion region region region region
Name
One
Two
Three
0 .02
Four
0 .3
Five
1 .0
Other
Retail
($835,205)
X
Recrea .
Serv .
0 .02
($17,978)
($1,026,053)
($1,129,082)
0 .5
($36,452)
2 .0
($53,846)
H-7
H-8
Table H-3
Output Multiplier Coefficients for
Recreation Services, 1979
Sector
Number
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Subregion
Subregion
0 .000067
0 .000030
0 .000016
0 .000027
0 .000073
0 .002102
0 .000234
0 .000072
0 .000193
0 .011938
0 .000403
0 .000518
0 .000079
0 .001838
0 .000499
0 .000177
0 .005602
0 .031487
0 .004204
0 .007663
0 .000425
0 .001579
0 .011021
0 .000634
0 .000505
0 .000258
0 .001591
0 .000631
0 .004016
0 .000079
0 .007319
0 .004966
0 .012740
0 .000016
0 .001268
0 .018335
0 .001603
0 .000138
0 .015956
0 .000014
0 .008282
Subregion
Four
Five
0 .000414
0 .000195
0 .000136
0 .000023
0 .000041
0 .003268
0 .001055
0 .000159
0 .000066
0 .012473
0 .000306
0 .000807
0 .000068
0 .001024
0 .000224
0 .001349
0 .002325
0 .024827
0 .003757
0 .006575
0 .000237
0 .001132
0 .001192
0 .000893
0 .000029
0 .000607
0 .000347
0 .000429
0 .003612
0 .000059
0 .002869
0 .004974
0 .012577
0 .000020
0 .000833
0 .024345
0 .002844
0 .000028
0 .012393
0 .000031
0 .006762
0 .000512
0 .000252
0 .000157
0 .000014
0 .000085
0 .000232
0 .000005
0 .000001
0 .000055
0 .010863
0 .000181
0 .000834
0 .000000
0 .002060
0 .000495
0 .001363
0 .000421
0 .024801
0 .000229
0 .000000
0 .000033
0 .000742
0 .001311
0 .000499
0 .000478
0 .000335
0 .000132
0 .000345
0 .003563
0 .000032
0 .007177
0 .004871
0 .012784
0 .000018
0 .002223
0 .024107
0 .000376
0 .000019
0 .015867
0 .000036
0 .007043
Two
H-9
Sector
Number
Subregion
Two
Subregion
Four
Subregion
Five
42
0 .020037
0 .012516
0 .011194
43
0 .000179
0 .000196
0 .000176
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .000041
0 .000001
0 .000179
0 .001157
0 .000021
0 .005849
0 .002521
0 .005520
0 .035697
0 .002493
0 .000543
0 .003723
0 .023195
1 .000000
0 .002887
0 .002563
0 .000122
0 .025276
0 .004563
0 .003018
0 .000547
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Output
Multipliers
.000034
.000002
.000186
.001017
.000020
.006203
.002562
.008815
.065134
.004060
.000820
.003781
.031311
.000000
.003411
.002626
.000145
.021695
.005605
.005079
.000127
1 .341443
1 .267129
.000051
.000001
.000172
.001198
.000019
.005571
.002347
.006164
.023955
.002836
.000367
.003049
.008858
.000000
.002617
.002487
.000079
.025279
.007950
.000740
.000255
1 .229916
H-10
Table fl-4
Output Multiplier Coefficients for
Other Retail Trade, 1979
Sector
Subregion
Number
Subregion
Two
.000044
.000024
.000003
.000021
.000064
.002764
.001537
.000111
.000048
.001966
.000289
.000531
Subregion
Five
Four
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0 .000065
0 .000058
0 .000000
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.001651
.000186
.000073
.004402
.019659
.002143
.012380
.000166
.000399
.001238
.000293
.000402
.000282
.000251
.000455
.002067
.000065
.002442
.008574
.007076
.000012
.000817
.011122
.000579
.000351
.000126
.000011
.002830
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
H-11
.000251
.000173
.000041
.000018
.000037
.005719
.007912
.000369
.000022
.001577
.000228
.000839
.000949
.000082
.000551
.001882
.015380
.001947
.011962
.000092
.000225
.000110
.000048
.000027
.000741
.000047
.000409
.001881
.000061
.000933
.009084
.006918
.000015
.000529
.014558
.000983
.000084
.000087
.000027
.002298
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.000339
.000231
.000057
.000011
.000077
.000146
.000359
.000001
.000008
.001144
.000134
.000863
.001898
.000181
.000556
.000342
.015223
.000095
.000000
.000013
.000118
.000102
.000237
.000402
.000403
.000018
.000345
.001780
.000009
.002062
.009003
.006951
.000013
.001392
.014228
.000126
.000057
.000103
.000032
.002248
Sector Subregion
Number
Two
Subregion
Four
Subregion
Five
42
0 .005248
0 .003102
0 .002584
43
0 .000033
0 .000029
0 .000022
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Output
Multipliers
.000003
.000030
.000027
.002994
.000000
.002040
.000000
.011549
.067874
.005254
.001801
.000384
.028968
.000150
.010431
.000132
.000100
.023017
.006983
.002961
.000090
1 .257585
.000004
.000025
.000022
.003512
.000000
.001730
.000000
.007759
.037448
.003426
.001566
.000344
.021540
.000123
.009374
.000074
.000066
.027018
.005766
.001679
.000378
1 .214139
.000006
.000030
.000018
.003700
.000000
.001513
.000000
.008820
.025084
.003977
.001395
.000246
.008220
.000070
.008487
.000048
.000035
.026898
.010028
.000402
.000170
1 .163053
H-12
Table H-5
Sector Subregion
Number
Two
Subregion Subregion
Four
Five
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
1
1
0
0
1
38
4
1
3
215
7
9
1
33
9
3
101
566
76
138
8
28
198
11
9
5
29
11
72
1
132
89
15
7
5
1
1
119
38
6
2
455
11
29
2
37
8
49
85
905
137
240
9
41
43
3
1
22
13
16
132
2
105
181
28
14
8
1
5
12
0
0
3
585
10
45
0
111
27
73
23
1,335
12
0
2
40
71
27
26
18
7
19
192
2
386
262
33
229
458
688
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
0
23
330
29
2
287
0
149
1
30
887
104
1
452
1
246
1
120
1,298
20
1
854
2
379
H-13
Sector
Subregion
Number
Two
Subregion
Four
Subregion
Five
42
360
456
603
43
- 3
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
1
0
3
18
0
112
46
158
1,171
73
15
68
563
17,978
61
47
1
0
7
42
1
213
92
201
1,301
91
20
136
846
36,452
105
93
3
0
9
65
1
300
126
332
1,290
153
20
164
477
53,846
141
134
60
61
62
63
64
390
101
91
2
921
166
110
20
1,361
428
40
14
H-14
Table H-6
Total Economic Impacts, by Sector,
for Other Retail Trade, 1979
Sector
Subregion
Number
Two
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Subregion
Four
10
5
1
5
15
632
351
25
11
449
70
49
12
5
10
1,606
2,222
104
6
443
Subregion
Five
105
71
18
3
24
45
111
0
2
354
11
66
64
41
12
121
236
267
13
15
16
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
377
43
17
1,006
4,494
490
2,830
38
91
283
67
92
64
57
104
472
15
558
1,960
1,617
3
187
2,542
132
80
29
266
23
155
529
4,319
547
3,359
26
63
31
13
8
208
13
115
528
17
262
2,551
1,943
4
149
4,088
276
24
24
587
56
172
106
4,704
29
0
4
36
32
73
124
124
6
107
550
3
637
2,782
2,148
4
430
4,397
39
18
32
40
10
41
647
645
695
H-15
Sector
Number
Subregion
Two
Subregion
Four
Subregion
Five
42
43
1,200
8
871
8
799
7
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
7
6
684
0
466
228,587
2,640
15,515
1,201
412
88
6,622
34
7
6
986
0
486
280,820
2,179
10,516
962
440
97
6,049
35
9
6
1,143
0
468
309,018
2,726
7,751
1,229
431
76
2,540
22
58
2,384
2,632
2,623
59
60
61
62
63
64
30
23
5,261
1,596
677
21
21
19
7,587
1,619
471
106
15
11
8,312
3,099
124
53
H-16
are the direct impact figures given in Table H-3 . Thus, Tables
H-5 and H-6 record,total economic impacts .
Most important, notice that the dollar magnitude of the
various sector impacts is quite low . In fact, these figures
may reflect little more than spurious accuracy, since the
inter-industry transactions data used in the construction of
the 1972 Texas Input-Output Model, which was used to develop
the regional models for this study, were rounded to the nearest
million dollars . What these low impact estimates support is
the conclusion that evidence made available to the research
team of Restrepo and Associates could not be used to support a
statement of a major net economic loss either at the regional
level, or at the subregional levels, due to the oil spills .
In sum mary, then, the analysis of indirect, induced-by
economic relationships associated with recreation at the
subregional area did not indicate any significant indirect
economic impacts associated with the oil spills . By inference,
what was found to be the case at the subregional level applies
also for the entire 19-county study region .
The input-output models developed for the study did
generate impact estimates at the subregional level (Tables H-5
and H-6), but these estimates must be carefully interpreted in
light of the degree of rounding on inter-industry transactions
used in the construction of the 1972 Texas Input-Output Model,
which was used to develop input-output models for this study .
The accounting of inter-industry transactions reported in the
Texas model are rounded to the nearest million dollars . This
degree of rounding is certainly appropriate for the Texas
economy . It is also appropriate for the oil impact study
region, but the impact figures given in Tables H-5 and H-6 are,
therefore, subject to spurious accuracy . However, sector
impact figures less than $1 million can be considered
insignificant anyway, particularly when viewed at the regional
level . Recall that for the purpose of this study, economic
impact was defined at the regional level rather than at the
establishment level . There are no sector impact figures shown
in Tables H-5 and H-6 that exceed $1 million .
RECOMMENDATIONS
The approach used by Restrepo and Associates to study the
economic effectsof the oil spills was generally macro in
orientation to be consistent with the study specifications and
objectives set forth by the Bureau of Land Management . The
objective here was to produce an estimate of direct and
indirect economic impacts of the spills on a particular study
area, which was defined by the Bureau of Land Management, as
well as to produce a methodology that could be used to assess
the impacts of other major spills .
H-17
H-18
APPENDIX I
MEDIA COVERAGE TABLES
li::m
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
i
A
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
Science News
USNWR
Newsweek
The Nation
L A Times
L A Times
L A Times
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Date of Category
Publication
09
17
26
15
02
07
04
19
24
24
27
29
23
26
02
03
02
02
28
17
26
24
Jun 79
Jun 79
Jun 79
Jun 79
May 81
Apr 80
Aug 80
Jul 80
Oct 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Sep 79
Aug 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Nov 79
Oct 79
Aug 79
Feb 80
Feb 80
Oct 79
17 Oct 79
03 Oct 79
26 Nov 79
Capping
Capping
Capping
Informatlon
Information
Information
Cost
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Legal/Political
Capping
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Tourism
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Information
Legal/Political
Capping
Capping
Capping
Burmah Agate
Media
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Time
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
Wall Sir Jour
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
Wall Sir Jour
Wall Sir Jour
Wall Str Jour
Wall Sir Jour
Wall Sir Jour
Wall Str Jour
Wall Sir Jour
Wall Sir Jour
Date of
Publication
23 Nov 79
31 Oct 79
07 Nov 79
08 Nov 79
10 Nov 79
11 Nov 79
12 Nov 79
13 Nov 79
13 Nov 79
19 Nov 79
06 Dec 79
13 Dec 79
09 Dec 79
26 Jul 79
25 Mar 80
06 Apr 80
12 Apr 80
17 Jun 80
23 May 80
24 Oct 79
19 Dec 79
18 Oct 79
14 Sep 79
09 Aug 79
12 Jul 79
12 Jun 79
26 Jun 79
Category
Burmah Agate
Capping
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Capping
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Information
Burmah Agate
Information
Capping
Environment
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Legal/Political
Fishing
Fishing
Capping
Capping
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
UI
Date of
Publication
Category
11
06
25
08
05
03
14
31
10
09
06
03
16
06
Jun 79
Jun 79
Mar 80
Oct 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Jul 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Mar 80
Jul 79
Sep 79
Cost
Capping
Capping
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Capping
Environment
Information
Information
Information
Environment
Information
08
09
10
14
15
18
30
23
22
26
23
26
04
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Sep 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Sep 79
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Environment
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Environment
Environment
Legal/Political
Tourism
Information
Media
Date of
Publication
Aviator Week
Business Week
L A Times
N Y Times
L A Times
Wall Str Jour
Dallas News
Ft Worth S T
Dallas T H
08
10
08
31
05
04
19
19
19
19
24
12
12
17
24
11
11
13
21
Oct 79
Oct 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Sep 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Oct 79
Mar 80
Mar 80
Aug 79
Oct 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Information
Legal/Political
Fishing
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
24
17
31
15
15
13
12
12
10
09
Aug
Aug
Oct
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Dallas T H
Houston Post
Austin A S
Austin A S
Corpus Christi C
Dallas T H
San Ant Exp
San Ant Exp
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin A S
N Y Times
L A Times
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
Times
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Category
Information
Information
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
Date of
Category
Media
Publication
~
01
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y Times
Y Times
Y Times
Y Times
Y Times ~
Y Times
Y Times
Y Times
Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
N Y Times
San Ant Exp
San Ant News
Houston Post
Corpus Christl C
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Port Arthur News
Austin A S
Austin A S
08
07
06
05
17
22
22
25
29
29
30
28
28
20
AUG 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Jul 79
Jul 79
Jul 79
Jul 79
Jul 79
Jul 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
Aug 79
09
04
27
28
10
05
23
20
17
15
13
09
04
24
Sep
Oct
Dec
Dec
Nov
Dec
Feb
Oct
Oct
Oct
Oct
Oct
Oct
Sep
79
79
79
79
79
80
80
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Date of
Category,,
Publication
Tourism
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Environment
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Austin A S
Austin A S
Houston Post
Austin A S
23
24
25
20
Sep
Sep
Aug
Mar
79
79
79
80
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Dallas News
Dallas T H
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin A S
Houston Post
22
03
03
28
24
11
Feb
Aug
Aug
Feb
Feb
Jan
80
79
79
80
80
80
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Capping
Austin A S
Houston Chron
Dallas News
Corpus Christi C
Dallas T H
Houston Post
San Ant Exp
Austin A S
San Ant Exp
Austin A S
Wichita Falls
Dallas News
Austin A S
05
23
16
18
17
Jan
Feb
Mar
Dec
Feb
80
80
80
79
80
13
13
13
05
05
24
23
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Oct
Oct
80
80
80
80
80
79
79
Austin
Corpus
Corpus
Dallas
Dallas
09
13
13
13
15
Jun
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
79
80
80
80
80
Capping
Capping
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
LBgal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
A S
Christi C
Christi C
T H
T H
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
Date of
Category
Media
Austin A S
Dallas T H
Houston Post
Austin A S
San Ant Light
Houston Post
Dallas News
San Ant Light
i
v
Austin A S
Houston Post
Houston Post
Daily Texan
Houston Post
Dallas News
Ft Worth S T
Houston P?st
Dallas News
Austin A S
Austin A S
Houston Post
Houston Chron
Houston Post
Dallas News
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin Citi
San Ant Exp
Corpus Christi C
15
16
16
15
27
27
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
Mar
80
80
80
80
80
80
02 Apr 80
21 Nov 79
19 Mar 80
25 Oct 79
13 Aug 79
13
22
22
21
18
18
18
20
17
19
19
15
19
18
19
15
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Sep
Oct
Oct
Oct
Aug
Oct
Oct
Oct
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Date of
Publication
Publication
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Potitical
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Category
Houston Post
Houston Post
18 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Dallas News
Houston Post
Dallas News
Dallas T H
Corpus Christi C
Daily Texan
Austin A S
Dallas T H
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
Dallas News
Austin A S
Houston Post
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Dallas News
Corpus Christi C
Corpus Christi C
Wall Str Jour
Houston Post
Dallas News
08 Aug 79
08 Oct 79
10 Oct 79
10 Aug 79
29 Jul 79
17 Aug 79
10 Jan 80
17 Oct 79
17 Oct 79
26 Sep 79
17 Oct 79
13 Mar 80
08 Mar 80
08 Mar 80
08 Mar 80
29 Dec 79
01 Mar 80
01 Mar 80
05 Feb 80
06 Dec 79
13 Mar 80
25 Mar 80
26 Feb 80
26 Jul 79
04 Nov 79
20 Mar 80
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Environment
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Capping
Capping
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Information
Information
Capping
Information
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
Date of
Category
Media
Publication
i
pp
Austin A S
Houston Post
Austin A S
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Chron
Dallas T H
Houston Chron
Dallas T H
San Ant Exp
San Ant Exp
Austin A S
Austin A S
Houston Post
Dallas T H
Houston Post
Dallas T H
Houston Post
Corpus Christi C
Houston Post
Corpus Christi C
Houston Post
San Ant Light
Houston Post
Houston Post
Dallas News
Dallas News
Austin A S
09
06
10
23
30
29
09
29
26
23
Aug
Aug
Aug
Dec
Dec
Dec
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
23 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
11 Aug 79
11 Aug 79
12 Aug 79
04 Aug 79
31 Jul 79
07 Aug 79
06 Apr 80
16 Mar 80
03 Oct 79
07 Oct 79
17 Sep 79
19 Sep 79
22 Aug 80
19 Aug 79
20 Aug 79
17 Aug 79
Date of
Category
Publication
Capping
Information
Information
Information
Burmah Agate
Information
Cost
Information
Capping
Environment
Information
Capping
Information
Cost
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Capping
Environment
Cost
Information
Environment
Information
Tourism
Tourism
Houston Post
Dallas News
Corpus Christi C
Austin A S
Austin A S
Houston Post
Austin A S
Austin A S
Wash Post
Ft Worth S T
Houston Post
Dallas News
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
London Times
Austin A S
Austin A S
San Ant Exp
Houston Post
Wall Str Jour
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
Austin A S
Dallas News
17
17
28
21
06
08
16
26
20
19
01
08
20
18
08
02
08
12
03
10
09
10
12
12
08
07
07
07
Aug
Aug
Dec
Nov
Dec
Aug
Aug
Mar
Aug
Aug
Nov
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Tourism
Information
Information
Fishing
Legal/Political
Environment
Information
Capping
Tourism
Tourism
Fishing
Information
Environment
Environment
Information
Environment
Information
Tourism
Information
Information
Fishing
Environment
Information
Information
Tourism
Environment
Environment
Information
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
Date'of
Category
Media
Publication
Houston Post
Houston Post
Dallas News
Dallas News
Dallas News
Houston Post
Austin A S
_
Austin A S
i Austin A S
~ Austin A S
Austin A S
Ft Worth S T
Austin A S
Ft Worth S T
Houston Chron
San Ant Exp
Austin A S
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
Dallas News
Dallas News
Houston Post
Houston Post
Houston Post
San Ant Light
Houston Post
Dallas News
05
09
03
03
21
15
15
16
09
13
13
13
01
01
19
16
16
19
19
19
22
22
22
21
21
19
16
17
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
May
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Date of
Category
Publication
Information
Information
Information
Fishing
Tourism
Information
Information
Tourism
Environment
Cost
Fishing
Information
Information
Information
Environment
Information
Environment
Environment
Information
Information
Information
Fishing
Information
Information
Information
information
Information
Cost
Austin A S
Austin A S
Dallas T H
San Ant Light
Daily Texan
Lufkin News
Dallas News
Austin A S
Dallas T H
Wall Str Jour
Austin A S
Houston Break
Dallas T H
Corpus Christi C
L A Times
L A Times
L A Times
L A Times
L A Times
L A Times
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
14
14
09
02
24
25
29
18
09
12
10
Aug 79
Aug 79
Mar 80
Dec 79
Jan 80
Mar 80
Apr 80
Nov 79
Mar 80
Jul 79
May 80
07 Mar 80
08 Mar 80
28 Feb 80
31 Oct 79
13 Jan 80
30 Jan 80
21 Apr 80
28 Jul 80
24 Sep 79
09 Mar 80
23 Sep 79
23 Aug 79
18 Aug 79
10 Jun 79
07 Aug 79
10 Jun 79
Information
Information
Environment
Tourism
Information
Information
Environment
Environment
Environment
Fishing
Environment
Information
Capping
Environment
Capping
Capping
Information
Information
Information
Capping
Capping
Capping
Legal/Political
Information
Environment
Information
Information
Information
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
i
~
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
Chicago Trib
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
London Times
Date of
Publication
11 Nov 79
03 Oct 79
25 Mar 80
01 Mar 80
02 Nov 79
06 Aug 79
30 Aug 79
24 Aug 79
21 Aug 79
20 Aug 79
19 Aug 79
05 Jul 79
08 Aug 79
15 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
14 Aug 79
06 Aug 79
25 Mar 80
20 Aug 79
14 Aug 79
09 Sep 79
Category
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Information
Capping
Capping
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Environment
Environment
Information
Information
Information
Capping
Capping
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Capping
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Media
Date of
Pub lic ation
London Times
London Times
London Times
Christ Scl
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
Christ Sci
10 Aug 79
27 Jul 79
04 Sep 79
24 Oct 79
15 Jan 80
25 Mar 80
17 Jul 79
27 Jul 79
01 Aug 79
06 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
21 Aug 79
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
Christ
21
22
27
29
06
27
22
23
02
06
21
26
25
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Sci
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Sep
Sep
Oct
Oct
Nov
Nov
Feb
Mar
Nov
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
80
79
Category
Environment
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Tourism
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Environment
Capping
Information
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Capping
Capping
Legal/Political
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
i
J
J
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Wash
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
Wash Post
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
New Orleans
Date of Category
Publication
25 Jun 79
16 Jul 79
19 Aug 79
26 Aug 79
19 Oct 79
26 Dec 79
02 Nov 79
08 Nov 79
06 Nov 79
10 Jun 79
28 Jul 79
06 Aug 79
07 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
10 Aug 79
11 Aug 79
14 Aug 79
14 Feb 80
29 Aug 79
07 Oct 79
26 Aug 79
29 Aug 79
16 Aug 79
12 Jul 79
27 Dec 79
27 Dec 79
22 Nov 79
19 Nov 79
Environment
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Capping
Capping
Galveston Oil
Galveston Oil
Legal/Political
Environment
Information
Information
Environment
Information
Information
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Capping
Information
Burmah Agate
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
06 Nov 79
01 Nov 79
24 Oct 79
15
29
21
11
11
13
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Jun
79
79
79
79
79
79
11 Jun 79
12 Jun 79
06 Jul 79
16 Jul 79
19 Jul 79
31 Jul 79
02 Aug 79
04 Aug 79
05 Aug 79
05 Aug 79
06 Aug 79
07 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
12 Aug 79
14 Aug 79
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Cost
Legal/Political
Fishing
Information
Fishing
Information
Capping
Information
Environment
Capping
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Date of
Publication
Category
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
14 Aug 79
17 Aug 79
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
17
18
18
18
19
20
24
25
26
27
28
30
31
02
04
08
10
11
24
25
30
02
07
16
02
03
Capping
Information
Information
Legal/Political
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Information
Environment
Information
Information
Media
~
~
N
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
New Orleans T P
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
Orleans
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Sep
Sep
Sep
Sep
Sep
Sep
Sep
Sep
Oct
Oct
Oct
Nov
Nov
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Information
Capping
Tourism
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Capping
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Media
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
New Orleans T P
Houston Post
Houston Post
Audobon
Houston Post
Dallas T H
Corpus Christi C
Corpus Christi C
Houston Chron
Houston Chron
Dallas T H
Dallas T H
Austin A S
Austin A S
Corpus Christi C
Corpus Christi C
Corpus Christi C
Corpus Christi C
Date of
Publication
05
17
09
10
10
12
13
23
24
27
30
04
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Nov
Jan
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
80
04 Jan 80
10 Jan 80
26 Mar 80
18 Mar 80
07 Apr 80
23 Aug 79
07 Mar 80
11 Mar 80
14 Aug 79
Category
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Information
Information
Burmah Agate
Capping
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Burmah Agate
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Capping
Information
Capping
Information
Information
Environment
Capping
Information
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
07 Aug 79
07 aug 79
Tourism
Legal/Poiitical
Information
Tourism
Table I-1
BLM MEDIA DATA SUMMARY
BY TYPE OF MEDIA, CATEGORY
AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
(CONTINUED)
Media
i
j
W
KTRK
KPRC
KHOU
KTRK
KHOU
I4TRK
KHOU
KPRC
KTRK
KHOU
KHOU
KPRC
KTRK
KTRK
KHOU
KTRK
KPRC
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
N=593
Date of Category
Publication
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
15 Aug 79
Legal/Political
Tourism
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
Tourism
Tourism
Information
Tourism
Fishing
Environment
Tourism
Tourism
Environment
Legal/Political
Legal/Political
Information
Houston Post
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
Austin A S
KPRC
KTRK
KPRC
KTRK
KHOU
KPRC
KHOU
KHOU
KHOU
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
KPRC TV
KPRC TV
13 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
Aug 79
03
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
07
07
07
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
Fishing
Information
Environment
Environment
Environment
Environment
Information
Information
Tourism
Environment
Information
Environment
Information
Information
Fishing
Tourism
Table 1-2
BLM MAGAZINE DATA SUMMARY
MAGAZINE
CATEGORY AND DATE OF PUBLICATION
BY
Media
Date of
Publication
Category
Audobon
06 Nov 79
Information
People Mag
27 Aug 79
Information
17 Dec 79
Information
20 Sep 79
Information
04 Sep 79
Capping
Science News
25 Oct 79
Information
Information
Nat Geo
Newsweek
10 Sep 79
Information
Newsweek
20 Aug 79
Information
Newsweek
15 Aug 79
Information
Newsweek
25 Jun 79
Capping
Time
16 Jul 79
Information
Time
20 Aug 79
USNWR
Science News
20 Aug 79
Information
Information
02 May 81
Information
USNWR
07 Apr 80
Information
Newsweek
04 Aug 80
Cost
The Nation
19 Jul 80
Information
28 Jul 79
Information
24 Oct 79
Legal/Political
19 Oct 79
Legal/Political
18 Oct 79
Capping
14 Sep 79
Legai/Poiitical
09 Aug 79
Fishing
12 Jul 79
Fishing
12 Jun 79
Capping
26 Jun 79
Capping
11 Jun 79
Cost
06 Jun 79
25 Mar 80
Capping
Outdoor Life
03 Mar 80
Aviation Week
08 Oct 79
Information
Business Week
10 Oct 79
Legal/Political
04 Sep 79
Legal/Political
26 Jul 79
Information
09 Aug 79
Fishing
12 Jul 79
Fishing
Audobon
04 Jan 80
Capping
N=38
1-14
Capping
Environment
Table 1-3
MEDIA
TIME
CATEGORY
KPRC TV
03 Aug 79
Environment
KTRK TV
06 Aug 79
Information
KPRC TV
KTRK TV
KHOU TV
06 Aug 79
06 Aug 79
06 Aug 79
Information
Tourism
Environment
KPRC TV
06 Aug 79
Information
KHOU TV
06 Aug 79
Environment
KHOU TV
06 Aug 79
Information
KHOU TV
KPRC TV
KPRC TV
07 Aug 79
07 Aug 79
07 Aug 79
Information
Fishing
Tourism
KTRK TV
KPRC TV
08 Aug 79
08 Aug 79
Legal/Political
Tourism
KHOU
KTRK
KHOU
KTRK
KHOU
KPRC
KTRK
08
08
08
08
08
09
09
Information
Environment
Legal/Political
Tourism
Tourism
Information
Tourism
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
TV
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
Aug
79
79
79
79
79
79
79
09 Aug 79
Fishing
KHOU TV
KPRC TV
KTRK TV
09 Aug 79
09 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
Environment
Tourism
Tourism
KTRK TV
KHOU TV
10 Aug 79
10 Aug 79
Environment
Legal/Political
KTRK TV
KPRC TV
10 Aug 79
15 Aug 79
Legal/Political
Information
KHOU TV
1-15